10
Review of Detector Solenoid Effect to the Beam • Effect on Beam Orbit • Effect on Beam Size S.Kuroda(KEK)

Review of Detector Solenoid Effect to the Beam Effect on Beam Orbit Effect on Beam Size S.Kuroda(KEK)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Review of Detector Solenoid Effect to the Beam

• Effect on Beam Orbit

• Effect on Beam Size

S.Kuroda(KEK)

Solenoid Effect on Beam Orbit• Sharp edge approximation Finite crossing angle with offset LcOffset@IP y=0 y’=-: No effect on Luminosity for e+e-, but need compensation for e-e- Need compensation for post IP polarimetry

=B0 c/(2 B)

y’= -2 for extracted beam must be also considered in extraction line design.

[B.Parker, A.Seryi]

Correction of the Orbit Offset2 correctors K1=/(1-L1/L2) ( inside sol.) K2= - /(L2/L1-1)( outside sol.)

Extracted beamy’=−Θ(2 + 1/(L2/L1 − 1))

[B.Parker, A.Seryi]

Detector Integrated Dipole(DID)• Real solenoid field extends and overlaps to FD.• Correction by FD offsetLarge orbit distortion Correction should be done locally(y changes inside solenoid) DID

DID: Co-winding with solenoid in cryostat 1. Smaller B radiation Length in detector acceptance 2. Avoiding torque(forces) between solenoid and B when B is introduced separately. 3. Large bore good uniformity in beam region

DID+FD offset IP angle compensation

[B.Parker]

Solenoid Effect on Beam Size

• Effect due to synchrotron radiation

SR ~ (B0 c L)5/2 F(optics) [PRSTAB-061001] (independent on beam energy) for c =20mrad full x-ing angle:SR = 0.31 nm in SDSR = 0.57 nm in LD where is understood as =sqrt[02 + 2]

• Overlapping effect of Bz to FD1. Real solenoid field extends and overlaps to FD Beam size growth

2. Independent on c

LD Bz profile

LD model, = 20 mrad LD model, = 0

[Y.Nosochkov, A.Seryi]green:no solenoidred:with solenoid

•Beam size compensation

Correction can be done using skew Q & SX displacement y/y0~1.03This correction method is difficult when E is very low.

SiD case only orbit cor.

Beam size cor.by SQ,SX…

[B.Parker, A.Seryi]

Example of LD solenoid compensation using two weak antisolenoids (2.26 and 0.07 Tm) placed at two FF quads.

Total field with and w/o antisolenoids

IP phase space with antisolenoid correction , y = 23%

With antisolenoids and linear knobs, y = 0.9%

[Y.Nosochkov, A.Seryi]

•IP distortion & beam size compensation for SiD(DID & anti-solenoid)

Additional B BXMID introduced

Beam size is corrected to y/y0~1.01by anti-solenoid and skew Q

Knob strength is relaxed by anti-solenoid

Summary• For non-zero x-ing angle, solenoid field will make finite y’ @IPy’ should be zeroed for e-e- collision/post IP polarimetry A corrector in solenoid region is needed( e.g. DID )

• Beam size growth due to overlapping solenoid field to FD ( indep. on x-ing angle ) >> Beam size growth due to synchrotron rad. Anti-solenoid method excellently compensates this effect ( down to low E )