7/29/2019 Science Assgmnt Online Submission

1/3

________________________________________________________________________

PENILAIAN / EVALUATION

Tugasan ini akan menyumbangkan 40% markah kepada kursus tersebut dan akan dinilai

berdasarkan kepada Rubrik. / This assignment accounts for 40% of the marks for thecourse mentioned and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics.

Anda akan dimaklumkan tentang markah tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir

Semester bermula / You would be informed of the assignment mark before the FinalSemester Examination commences.

PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION

Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan secara automatik akan disemak untuk persamaan.

Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning: Thesubmitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism isdetected, marks would be deducted as follows:

Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandunganantara 10 - 30 % : potongan 20% daripadajumlah markah yang diperoleh.

Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandunganantara 31 - 50 % : potongan 40% daripadajumlah markah yang diperoleh.

Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar akandiberikan.

Assignments with 10 - 30 % overlapwith others: 20%deduction from the total marksscored.

Assignments with 31 - 50 % overlapwith others: 40%deduction from the total marksscored.

Assignments with morethan50%overlapwith others: Zeromark would be given

7/29/2019 Science Assgmnt Online Submission

2/3

2

Assignment Guidelines (Content and Scoring)

Criteria Weight

Missing

Item

Weak Partially Meets

Standards

Meets

StandardExceeds

Standard Max

Marks0 1 2 3 4

Introduction 1.0 There is no

introductionto the paper.

The introduction does

not mention thestructure andobjectives of the paperand importantconcepts.

The introduction

previews the structureof the paper but is notvery clear.

The introduction

previews thestructure of thepaper andobjectives in analmost clearmanner.

The introduction

previews thestructure andobjectives of thepaper clearly.Important conceptsare also clearlyexplained.

4

Discussionof scientificskills asimportanttools for

learningscience

3.0 There is nodescription ofscientificskills.

Brief description ofboth types of scienceprocess skills andmanipulative skills.

No explanation howthe skills are used todo science orinvestigation.

Brief description ofmeaning and the list ofscientific skills clearly.

Describes less clearly

how both types ofscience process skillsand manipulative skillsare necessary tounderstand scienceconcepts and to doinvestigation.

Describes themeaning and the listof scientific skills.

Describes clearly

how both types ofscience processskills andmanipulative skillsare necessary tounderstand scienceconcepts and to doinvestigation.

Describes themeaning and the listof scientific skillsvery clearly.

Describes veryclearly how bothtypes of scienceprocess skills andmanipulative skillsare necessary tounderstand scienceconcepts and to doinvestigation.

12

Analysis of the

scientific and

thinking skills

in the

activities

chosen

3 Nodescription.

No list ofscientific andthinking skills

Description of both

activities not clear.

Able to point out all the

scientific and thinking

skills for one of theactivities.

Description of one

activity is partially clear,the other not clear.

Able to point out all the

scientific and thinking

skills for both activities.Also able to identify at

Description of the 2

activities is partiallyclear.

Able to point some

scientific and thinking

skills for bothactivities.

Clearly describes both

activities chosen.

Able to point out all

the scientific and

thinking skills for bothactivities.

12

7/29/2019 Science Assgmnt Online Submission

3/3

3

in theactivities.

Not able to identify at

which stage of the

activities are the skillsincorporated correctly.

which stage of the

activities are the skills

incorporated incorrectly.

Also able to identify

at which stage of the

activities are the skillsincorporated less

correctly.

Also able to identify at

which stage of the

activities are the skillsincorporated correctly.

Improvement

of theactivities

2 No

suggestion.

Suggestions are below

average.

Suggestions are average. Suggestions given for

improvement meetexpectation.

Suggestion for the

improvement isdeemed aboveexpectation.

8

Conclusion 1.0 Noconclusionprovided.

There is no clearconclusion, the paper

just ends.

The conclusion isrecognisable, but doesnot tie up introduction,content andevaluation.

The conclusion tiesup/brings togetherthe introduction,content andevaluation. Wellsummarised.

The conclusion isstrong. It ties up/brings together theintroduction, contentand evaluation. Wellsummarised.

4

TOTAL MARKS 40