Upload
sybil
View
25
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Search for CP Violation in B 0 h decays and B 0 h decays with B A B AR. Christophe Y èche (CEA-Saclay, DAPNIA/SPP). Outline: CP asymmetries in + - and + K - (PRL, 89, 281802 (2002)) Decay rates for + 0 and 0 0 (submitted to PRL, hep-ex/0303028) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Search for CP Violation in B0h decays
and B0h decays with BABAR
International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics ,July 17th-23rd, 2003, Aachen, Germany
Christophe Yèche (CEA-Saclay, DAPNIA/SPP)
Outline:• CP asymmetries in +- and +K- (PRL, 89, 281802 (2002))
• Decay rates for +0 and 00 (submitted to PRL, hep-ex/0303028)
• CP asymmetries in +- and +K- (submitted to PRL, hep-ex/0306030)
• Decay rates for +0, 0+ and 00(BABAR-CONF-03/014)
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
CP Violation in Standard Model
2
tbtstd
cbcscd
ubusud
CKM
VVV
VVV
VVV
V
VtdVtb*
VudVub*
VcdVcb*
B,
BJ/KSBDK
• CP symmetry can be violated in any field theory with at least one non-trivial phase in the Lagrangian
• This condition is satisfied in the SM through the three-generation CKM quark-mixing matrix
• Unitary constraint 0*** tbtdcbcdubud VVVVVV
Representation with Unitary Triangle:• The angles (,,) are related to CPviolating asymmetries in specific B decays
• is already measured with good precision: Sin2 = 0.734 ± 0.055
• Next step: “measurement” of sin2
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
CP Violation in B0+ -
tmCtmSBBA dd cossin)/(00
2
2
||1
||1
C
2||1
Im2
S
C0, S= Im () =sin2
i
f eA
A
p
q 2
C 0, S= sin2eff
For single weak phase With an additional weak phase
Penguin diagramTree diagram
|A(penguin)/A(tree)|~ 30%
| | 1 must fit for direct CPIm () sin2 need to relate asymmetry to C 0, S= sin2eff
Vub
Vtd
*
3
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
z
0tagB
ee
S4
K
0recB
Inclusive Reconstruction B-Flavor Tagging
Exclusive B Meson Reconstruction
CP eigenstates
Flavor eigenstates
(flavor eigenstates) Resolution function and mistags
(CP eigenstates) CP analysis
00flavrec BB
00CPrec BB
PEP-2 (SLAC)
Experimental technique
4
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
Background suppression- Discriminating variables
5
2*2beamES
*BpEm *
beam* EEE B
(mES) 2.6 MeV/c2 (E) 26 MeV
mES: powerful variable to separate signal from light-quark continuum
E: some separation power for final states with different K/ composition
mES and E are used in the likelihood
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
Continuum suppression- Discriminating variables
6
uuee
“Jets”
ππBBee 00
*iθ
candidate
candidate candidate
candidate
• Spherical B events vs jet-like continuum: Techniques exploiting event topology and angular distributions
• Fisher variable: Combine two “monomials”,
where the sum is over the tracks i of the “Rest-Of-Event”
Use as a discriminating variable in the Likelihood
i
ipL *0
iiipL
2**2 )cos(and
“Rest-Of-Event”
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
PID: K/ Separation
7
KDDD 00* ,
K hypothesis hypothesis
DIRC: Cherenkov light emitted by the track around a cone with
Photons are captured by internal reflection in the bar and transmitted to a PMT matrix.
Resolution (c) = 2.5 mrad (e+e-+-)
n/1cos c
Cherenkov angle c is used in the likelihoodto separate , K, KK
8 at 2GeV/c2.5 at 4GeV/c
K/ momentum:2 4 GeV/c
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
B0+ -/ K+ - / K+K-
Branching Fractions
8
6
0
10)2.06.07.4()(BF
B
6
0
10)7.09.09.17(
)(BF
KB
The yields are extracted from a maximum likelihood fitbased on the variables:mES, E, F and c
)CL 90%(106.0)(BF 60 KKB
Continuum e+e- q q
Continuum
B0+-B0+-
B0K+-B0K+-
K
N(B0 +-) = 157 ± 19 ± 7
N(B0 K+-) = 589 ± 30 ± 17
Projection plots
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
CP Asymmetry Results for -+ / -K+
ACP (K) = -0.102 0.050 0.016C = -0.30 0.25 0.04S = 0.02 0.34 0.05
)cos()sin()/(00 tmCtmSBBA
9
The CP parameters are extracted from a maximum likelihood fit based on the variables: mES, E, F , c and t (for C and S)
1-ps)05.052.0(
ps)07.056.1(
dm
Cross-checks:Float and md
B0K+-
No Observation of CP Violation
A(B
0 /B
0 )
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
Constraint on : Isospin Analysis•The decays B +-, +0, 00 are related by isospin
Two relations (one for B0, one for B0) Neglecting EW penguins, B+ +0 is pure tree diagram Representation with a triangle with a common side. Need to measure separate BF for B0/B0 and B+/B-
Triangle relations allow determination of penguin-induced shift in
• Bound on penguin pollution “Back up” solution if the BF(00) is too small for isospin analysis!!!
22 eff
)(
)/()(sin
0
0000
eff2
BBF
BBBF
)(A~
)(A 00 BB
M. Gronau and D. London,Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 3381 (1990)
Y. Grossman and H.R. Quinn,Phys. Rev., D58, 017504 (1998)
10
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
B 00 /+0 BF
Fit region
Continuum
Continuum e+e- q q
• B++0 decays
Likelihood fit with mES, E, F and c
Potential +- background suppressed
with a tight cut on E
• B000 decays
Likelihood fit with mES, E, F T
Potential +0 background suppressedwith a cut on M(+0) and on E(+0 0)
• Bound on penguin pollution
60.19.0
0 10)6.05.5()(BF
B
C.L. %[email protected])/(BF
10)6.1()/(BF
60000
66.0 7.03.0 6.0
0000
BB
BB
C.L. %90@51eff
11
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
Interpretation• Isospin Analysis
Large upper limit for BF(B000)Confidence levels obtained with the BABAR measurements of C, S,,BF(B000) and BF(B++0) Independent of models but no constraint in (,) plane
• QCD factorization
The phase and the magnitude of the treeand penguin amplitudes are predicted bythe QCD factorization. Confidence levels obtained with the BABAR measurements of C and S. Very strong constraint in (,) plane.
BBNS, Nucl. Phys., B606, 245 (2001)
12
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
How to measure with B0 ?
• Two final states: Same diagrams as B0- +, related to angle Final states are not CP eigenstates Two parameters (C, S) Four parameters (C, S, C, S) + charge asymmetry -/+
• Comparison with B0- + :Larger Branching Fractions (4) Smaller ratio |A(penguin)/ A(tree)|
13
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
• Time probability of the B0 /K
Parameters measured in the the /K analysis
)cos()()sin()(1))(1()(
)cos()()sin()(1))(1()(
/||
/||
0
0
tmCCtmSSehAtf
tmCCtmSSehAtf
hhhht
CPh
B
hhhht
CPh
B
14
Parameterization similar to B0+-
• 4 CP Violation Parameters: Direct CP Violation with the charge asymmetries (+/-) ACP0 for K and .
Summing over the charge, we have the “usual” (B0/B0) asymmetry:
Direct CP Violation: C 0
CP in interference between decay and mixing: S 0
• 2 Dilution Parameters: C can be different from zero (naïve factorizationC~0.3). S can be different from zero, no prediction for this term. if C=0 (P(B0/B0+-)=P(B0 /B0-)) and S=0
no dilution of sin(2eff) when S is measured!
)cos()sin()/()()/( 0000
00 tmCtmSNNNNBBABBBB
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
Overview of /K analysis
15
• Analysis very similar to /K analysis: Same data set (19992002) ~ 81 fb-1. Tagging and resolution function studied with fully reconstructed events. Simultaneous fit of and K events. Extraction of a the CP parameters with a maximum Likelihood fit using the same kind of variables mES, E, F /NN, c and t.
• Features specific to /K analysis : Continuum Suppression: NN with L0, L2 and two additional variables
o Mass (mass of the pair (±0)).o Helicity (angle between 0 and B in rest frame).
Modeling of true-signal and misreconstructed-signal. Modeling of charm and charmless B backgrounds.
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
B0/K Branching Fractions
Continuum
Continuum + B backgroundContinuum
Continuum + B background
16
Continuum
Continuum + B backgroundContinuum
Continuum + B background
K K
6
00
10)2.28.16.22(
)/(BF
BB
63.12.1
0
10)3.13.7()(BF
KB
Projectionplots
1834428
)(N
2521120
)(N
K
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
CP AsymmetryResults for /K
ACP () = -0.18 0.08 0.03ACP (K) = 0.28 0.17 0.08
C = 0.36 0.18 0.04C = 0.28 0.18 0.04
S = 0.19 0.24 0.03S = 0.15 0.25 0.03
)/(00 BBA
17
Continuum + B backgroundB background
See P-F Giraud’s Talk, about direct CP Violation. By combining C, C and ACP
() a little more than a 2 effect for direct CP Violation.
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
B 00 /+0/ 0+ BF• Principle of the analyses
Approach very similar to B0+-
Likelihood fit with mES, E, NN and (t)
• Next steps
Isospin analysis (more complicated)Two triangles Two pentagons Interpretation with QCD factorization For a first attempt, see next slide. (0-+) Dalitz plot analysis.
C.L. %[email protected])(BF
10)5.07.09.0()(BF
10)8.00.12.9()(BF
10)9.19.10.11()(BF
6000
6000
60
60
B
B
B
B
First observation !!!
Continuum + B background
Continuum
Continuum
Continuum +B background
B+ +0
B0 00
18
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
Interpretation with QCD factorization• Direct CP with QCD factorization
In recent papers, computation of QCDfactorization for PV decays (,…) QCD Factorization predicts very small direct CP violation for +-, better agreement with charming penguin.
• Mixing-induced CP Violation C.L. in (,) plane the BaBar results for the S and S withthe computation of QCD factorization for PV decays
R. Aleksan et al., Phys. Rev. D67, 094019 (2003)
See S. Safir Talk
BABAR QCDFQCDF +
Ch. penguin
ACP() -0.18 ±0.09 -0.015 -0.115
C 0.36 ±0.18 0.019 0.092
C 0.28 ±0.18 0.250 0.228
19
Ch. Yèche EPS 2003 Aachen, 18 July, 2003
Conclusions
• BABAR results: No observation of CP Violation in B0+-. A “hint” of direct CP Violation in B0+-. No observation of B000 and B000 decays. First observation of B++0 decay.
• Prospects The isospin analysis does not constrain yet. QCD factorization may give very strong constraint on but still needs to be validated. The redundancy in experimental measurements (B0+-, B0+-, and B0+-) may provide a solid framework to test theoretical models and to extract .
20