1
Factors β 95% CI P- value TRECs 1 m MA 0.224 (0.034– 0.592) 0.028 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.356 (0.191– 1.150) 0.007 * 3 m Younger recipient age 0.243 (0.046– 0.781) 0.028 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.555 (0.623– 1.689) 0.000 * Relation 0.222 (0.007– 0.710) 0.045 * 6 m Younger recipient age 0.342 (0.277– 1.595) 0.006 * No chronic GVHD 0.498 (0.714– 1.880) 0.000 * 1 y Younger recipient age 0.584 (0.922– 2.301) 0.000 * PID 0.366 (0.221– 1.809) 0.013 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.532 (0.504– 3.417) 0.011 * BM (compared with CB) - 0.356 (-1.865– - 0.150) 0.023 No chronic GVHD 0.467 (0.527– 2.041) 0.001 * 2 y Younger recipient age 0.707 (0.974– 2.592) 0.000 * PID 0.584 (0.567– 2.500) 0.003 * sjKRECs 1 m Younger donor age (BM) 0.396 (0.187– 0.833) 0.003 * BM (compared with CB) - 0.252 (-0.772– - 0.075) 0.018 3 m Younger recipient age 0.233 (0.048– 1.287) 0.035 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.425 (0.445– 2.132) 0.004 * BM (compared with CB) - 0.272 (-1.325– 0.117) 0.020 Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.370 (0.485– 1.984) 0.002 * No chronic GVHD 0.392 (0.478– 1.538) 0.000 * No use of PSL/HDC 0.309 (0.246– 1.334) 0.005 * 6 m Younger recipient age 0.423 (0.522– 1.794) 0.001 * MA 0.316 (0.192– 1.466) 0.012 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.448 (0.257– 2.369) 0.017 * Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.320 (0.209– 2.065) 0.017 * No chronic GVHD 0.281 (0.085– 1.378) 0.027 * No use of ATG 0.339 (0.285– 1.730) 0.007 * 1 y Younger recipient 0.492 (0.462– 0.001 Supplementary Table II. Univariate analysis of factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs. *Significant favorable factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs. †Significant unfavorable factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs. Factors β 95% CI P- value cjKRECs 1 m Younger donor age (BM) 0.353 (0.190– 1.185) 0.008 * 3 m Younger recipient age 0.224 (0.023– 1.405) 0.043 * MA 0.239 (0.063– 1.338) 0.032 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.525 (0.936– 2.793) 0.000 * BM (compared with CB) - 0.326 (-1.672– - 0.312) 0.005 Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.310 (0.301– 2.023) 0.009 * No chronic GVHD 0.392 (0.532– 1.714) 0.000 * No use of PSL/HDC 0.297 (0.235– 1.447) 0.007 * 6 m Younger recipient age 0.451 (0.673– 2.058) 0.000 * MA 0.252 (0.012– 1.449) 0.046 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.422 (0.191– 2.657) 0.025 * PB (compared with CB) - 0.438 (-2.473– - 0.329) 0.012 Grade 0-2 of aGVHD 0.267 (0.004– 2.091) 0.049 * No chronic GVHD 0.332 (0.256– 1.658) 0.008 * No use of ATG 0.295 (0.158– 1.779) 0.020 * 1 y Younger recipient age 0.459 (0.414– 1.630) 0.002 * Younger donor age (BM) 0.466 (0.101– 1.647) 0.029 * BM (compared with PB) 0.377 (0.033– 2.091) 0.044 * Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.414 (0.358– 2.429) 0.010 * No chronic GVHD 0.358 (0.149– 1.447) 0.017 * 2 y PID 0.505 (0.171– 1.352) 0.014 * BM (compared with CB) - 0.478 (-0.790– - 0.050) 0.028 PB (compared with CB) - 0.722 (-3.091– - 0.499) 0.012 BM (compared with PB) 0.620 (0.280– 2.470) 0.018 * Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.659 (0.551– 2.236) 0.003 * No chronic GVHD 0.493 (0.143– 1.287) 0.017 *

*Significant favorable factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Supplementary Table II. Univariate analysis of factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs. *Significant favorable factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: *Significant favorable factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs

Factors β 95% CI P-valueTRECs1 m MA 0.224 (0.034– 0.592) 0.028*

Younger donor age (BM) 0.356 (0.191– 1.150) 0.007*3 m Younger recipient age 0.243 (0.046– 0.781) 0.028*

Younger donor age (BM) 0.555 (0.623– 1.689) 0.000*Relation 0.222 (0.007– 0.710) 0.045*

6 m Younger recipient age 0.342 (0.277– 1.595) 0.006*No chronic GVHD 0.498 (0.714–1.880) 0.000*

1 y Younger recipient age 0.584 (0.922– 2.301) 0.000*PID 0.366 (0.221– 1.809) 0.013*Younger donor age (BM) 0.532 (0.504–3.417) 0.011*BM (compared with CB) -0.356 (-1.865– -0.150) 0.023†No chronic GVHD 0.467 (0.527– 2.041) 0.001*

2 y Younger recipient age 0.707 (0.974– 2.592) 0.000*PID 0.584 (0.567– 2.500) 0.003*

sjKRECs1 m Younger donor age (BM) 0.396 (0.187– 0.833) 0.003*

BM (compared with CB) -0.252 (-0.772– -0.075) 0.018†3 m Younger recipient age 0.233 (0.048– 1.287) 0.035*

Younger donor age (BM) 0.425 (0.445– 2.132) 0.004*BM (compared with CB) -0.272 (-1.325– 0.117) 0.020†Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.370 (0.485–1.984) 0.002*No chronic GVHD 0.392 (0.478–1.538) 0.000*No use of PSL/HDC 0.309 (0.246– 1.334) 0.005*

6 m Younger recipient age 0.423 (0.522– 1.794) 0.001*MA 0.316 (0.192– 1.466) 0.012*Younger donor age (BM) 0.448 (0.257–2.369) 0.017*Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.320 (0.209– 2.065) 0.017*No chronic GVHD 0.281 (0.085– 1.378) 0.027*No use of ATG 0.339 (0.285– 1.730) 0.007*

1 y Younger recipient age 0.492 (0.462– 1.567) 0.001*PID 0.329 (0.080– 1.277) 0.027*PB (compared with CB) -0.469 (-2.884– -0.102) 0.037†Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.436 (0.396– 2.220) 0.006*No chronic GVHD 0.501 (0.477– 1.587) 0.001*

2 y Younger recipient age 0.632 (0.475– 1.669) 0.001*PID 0.459 (0.099–1.523) 0.028*Younger donor age (BM) 0.761 (0.493– 2.266) 0.007*BM (compared with CB) -0.593 (-1.381– -0.291) 0.005†PB (compared with CB) -0.701 (-3.087– -0.406) 0.016†Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.682 (0.701–2.544) 0.002*No chronic GVHD 0.447 (0.070– 1.447) 0.032*

Supplementary Table II. Univariate analysis of factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs.

*Significant favorable factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs.†Significant unfavorable factors that contributed to the levels of TRECs, sjKRECs, and cjKRECs.

Factors β 95% CI P-valuecjKRECs1 m Younger donor age (BM) 0.353 (0.190– 1.185) 0.008*3 m Younger recipient age 0.224 (0.023– 1.405) 0.043*

MA 0.239 (0.063– 1.338) 0.032*Younger donor age (BM) 0.525 (0.936– 2.793) 0.000*BM (compared with CB) -0.326 (-1.672– -0.312) 0.005†Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.310 (0.301– 2.023) 0.009*No chronic GVHD 0.392 (0.532– 1.714) 0.000*No use of PSL/HDC 0.297 (0.235– 1.447) 0.007*

6 m Younger recipient age 0.451 (0.673– 2.058) 0.000*MA 0.252 (0.012– 1.449) 0.046*Younger donor age (BM) 0.422 (0.191– 2.657) 0.025*PB (compared with CB) -0.438 (-2.473– -0.329) 0.012†Grade 0-2 of aGVHD 0.267 (0.004– 2.091) 0.049*No chronic GVHD 0.332 (0.256– 1.658) 0.008*No use of ATG 0.295 (0.158– 1.779) 0.020*

1 y Younger recipient age 0.459 (0.414– 1.630) 0.002*Younger donor age (BM) 0.466 (0.101– 1.647) 0.029*BM (compared with PB) 0.377 (0.033–2.091) 0.044*Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.414 (0.358– 2.429) 0.010*No chronic GVHD 0.358 (0.149– 1.447) 0.017*

2 y PID 0.505 (0.171– 1.352) 0.014*BM (compared with CB) -0.478 (-0.790– -0.050) 0.028†PB (compared with CB) -0.722 (-3.091– -0.499) 0.012†BM (compared with PB) 0.620 (0.280–2.470) 0.018*Grade 0–2 aGVHD 0.659 (0.551– 2.236) 0.003*No chronic GVHD 0.493 (0.143– 1.287) 0.017*