Slobodan Panov-Osnov Za Razvod Svetovnog Braka

5/28/2018 Slobodan Panov-Osnov Za Razvod Svetovnog Braka

1/30

107

347.627.2 ; 173.1 ; 347.447.8:347.626.2

.

. , . - ( - ). - ( - , rebussic stantibus, , , . - , ). - (- ; - , . ; ,

).

: . . . Rebus sic stantibus. . .

1.

,

.1

, -

,[email protected].

1 2012., , - . , ... , . , -

, ... -


2/30

, LX, 1/2012

108

, - , (-

- ). - -, () /- , , ,2 , - , , , , , -, , ,3 . -

, , , /, , .

, -- ( , ) . , - -

- , -, ,- .

2. -

(). () -: o , / - . 4 (, . -

, , . , Terra nostra terra incognita , 2010, 7.

2 . : -

, . - . / : , a - 1945. , . , (14921992), 2011, 192. - / , , ,

3 , j , , , , I, 1/2010, 6.

4 -

, ,


3/30

. (. 107136)

109

5). . ,

. ,6

, . -

: - ( 7 // ); - , -, ( / - ). , . - . -, () / ., /, - - .8

, , , public good, . Jonathan Herring, Family Law, Exeter College Oxford University,2004, 89.

5 , . () - (. ). / / /, / , . , , 2009,444450, 477.

6 ,

- . ( - () ) ( - - ). , , . , - , 2006, 7790. , . , , 18502000, 2007, 283288.

7 -, , . . , (2009), 194.

8 . , XIXXI , 2008,

199.


4/30

, LX, 1/2012

110

/, -. , Harry Willekens, -

, / , - , .9- . , -. -

, , .

, , , / ( ). : , , -

, , -, ...

, - , . .

, , , . , () - , , , / . - , - , - - ( ,

, , ). - - , ., , . , , -

9 . Harry Willekens, Is Contemporary Western Family Law HistoricallyUnique?, Journal of Family History, 28, 1/2003, 70, . , , , ,

2011, 67.


5/30

. (. 107136)

111

, . ( ) , , 10/, , ... -

, , , . . , -

,11 , ,12 / . / , - . ,

.13

.14 - - , () - .15

, - , ,16

10 2 ( 2) , () . : , / ,, , / . , , , - . - .

11 , , - , : - . ( )

: . . , , . (2010), 10, , . (2009), 140.

12 , , , . . (2008), 71.

13 . . , . , . , (2011),6773.

14 . , I, 1981, 8.15 . , , 1964, 107, 309.

16 ,

( ), (


6/30

, LX, 1/2012

112

. - , in rerum natura, . ,

. , , , , . . , - .17 , . . - ( - ), , .

-, - .18 ( , -). , , , , . , .19 , , . , -, , , ? , . ,

. . : . ,

) , . , , 2009, 455.

17 . , -, , , , 2000, 251, . , , 2010, 48.

18 . , , 1998, 12.

, , . , ( ) ( , ).

19 , , , - . 18. 19. , , . - , , (.

, ), 2005, 7.


7/30

. (. 107136)

113

. , . , , / ,

: . , , , , , , , . .

, . . , , .20 - , , . , . ,

, .21 -. , . , : - . : : ... , .

.22 , . , . - : .23

2429. 2008. -

20 , , , , (. ). , . . . , ,. (. ), , 2009,1117.

21 , , (. ), , 2009,6371.

22 . , , 2002, 83, 5859.

23 . ,, 2009, 7778.


8/30

, LX, 1/2012

114

, 24. - . -

( , -. ). , , , .25

prima facie: , / . :

. , - .26 , . . . 27 , ,.28 . , . . , (,

24 ,

. . . .

25 . . - ( , ), , , , . , , (. ), 2009, 1133.

26 , ; , , (1. . 6, 12, 10, 23).

, , - , . , , 2005, 81.

27 . , , , . , , , , 2006,211. : , , . , , 1992, 111.

28 , , :Ignota nullacuratio morbid . ( , . ..) , , . . , , 2011, 28.


9/30

. (. 107136)

115

)., , . , ()

.

29

, -, , . , -, , ... , .30 . , .31 , .32, : /, -, .33 : .

, , .34 , ,

( ,35

29 . . , (2009), 99, 229, 233, 234, 239, 243, 158. , , , , . , -, 2003, 45.

30 . , , , (. , ), 2006, 79, 28.

31 : 1714. (10 -) 18401856. (76 ): 317 . / , Brenda Hale, David Pearl, ElizabethCooke, Daniel Monk, The Family, Law&Society, Oxford University Press, New York2009, 146, 159.

32 , ,Lord Ashbourne , , . J. Herring (2004), 23.

33 . , , -

2009, 21, 23, 24, 27.34 , ,

. ,. , , , 2006, 238248, 252, 267 .

35 , . , . - 50% , . , . . , (2009), 202. O : ... ... ... , -, . , . ,


10/30

, LX, 1/2012

116

, . ) / : - , . -

. . , -. ,36 . - .37 , -. 38 .39 .

().40 ,

, , , , -, /. - , , .41

(2007), 73, 72. , , .

. , , , . . , (2006), 9395. : , , . . (1992), 117. , . . , (2011), 455.

36 , , , , . , , , 2004, 32.

37 , . . (2007), 629.

38 . - , /, .

39 . , . , , , . . , (2007), 78.

40 . , , -. e, (. . , ), 2010, 245.

41 , , (.

), , 2006, 7.


11/30

. (. 107136)

117

: . . , ,

, , . , , .

/ . , , . Eurostat-, 2003. 42 ()()(28% ).42, . : () 1960. 170 , 2006., : .43 , (AlainTouraine), ( ,

, ), , .44 ( / - ) / ( , E. Badinter).45 -

42 . , , , . , , , 2005, 185.

43 , 2002. 250 , 148 , 150 , . J. Herring (2004), 79.

44 , , . , - . , , , , ( 36, 21. ). , ( , - , , , , . ). - , , . , , ,, ... (), , (, - ) . , , , -, , . . , (1992), 25 , 55, 61, 67, 97, 105, 107, 122.

45 . . , . , . (2011), 5962.


12/30

, LX, 1/2012

118

() . . / ,

( , /pour le meilleur et sans pire). , (Singley). . , -, , . / . , , -. (social exchange theory), ,

-. , (,, .) . , .

, . , , , .

/ ,.46 - . - , , ,47 -

, .48

( ) .49 - -: (115

46 : : , ,. , ,, 1987, 5. : , . , ; , ... , , , . (. ), 2010, 147.

47 : , -, . , . , (2007), 48. ( ), . , (2006), 107.

48 . . (2008), 248257.

49 . . (1992), 139.


13/30

. (. 107136)

119

50) ( 26. 2004. , ,

, , 51).

: .52 , . /- , .53 : -

. . , , (eudaimonia) .

, -. -/ , -

. (, , ) . , , / : -... . . ,

- .

-, : . . .54

(, , ) ? , ,

, . , - .

50 (Abneigung) E. N. M,Neodoljiva mrnja kao brakorazvodni uzrok prema Austrijskom graanskom zakoniku,Zadar 1902, 3 66.

51 . . (2009), 456.

52 . , , . . , (1992), 115. , , , .. (2004), 19.

53 . , , - , , 2000, 329.

54 (.

, ), 2007, 37 .


14/30

, LX, 1/2012

120

( ) , , - , ,

, , ( ) , . , // . , ( ) -//, . : - , , .55 - .

/ . . Primum philosophare,deinde vivere. () ( ) . - , -: , - ... .56 -/ . .57

-

, . . , /-/,58 . /-

. ,59

55 . . (1992), 16.

56 . (2007), 262, 279. . ., (2009) 91.

57 . . (2009), 15.

58 , : , . , (2004), 14. . : , , . , , - , 2000, 118.

59 ... , - (., 6,33). , , , , , . , , -, 2005, 559.


15/30

. (. 107136)

121

. , - -, : , . . , :

/ -, , , : .60 , /

, , , -, ( - ), ()() . .61 /, .62 , / -

, , .63 - , , , , . ,

60 . , , . , . , , . . (2009) 13.

61

, ., (2010), 7.

62 - , , , , . -, / . . / /, . . , , , - . , - .

, . 27. , 10. , . , (1964), 124. - . . , , 10/2011, 527.

63 2005. , unreasonablebehaviour, , , , (desertion) . : - ; , the real meals, . B. Hale, D. Pearl, E. Cooke,D. Monk, (2009), 153, 167. , ,

, / .


16/30

, LX, 1/2012

122

.64 65 (, -, .).

: - , .66

3. -

in rerum natura -, , , , , , . - . -

, , , .

.67 ,. / . - , - , 68sui

generis.

, . (. 124 ), rebus sic stantibus(. 133 ),

64 . . (2011), 248268

65 - , . . . (2011), 265. - . , - , , . , ( ).

66 . . . , . , . . , -, 2011, 3.

67 . , , , , . , , 13/1998, -, 60.

68 -

, . . , (1964), 109.


17/30

. (. 107136)

123

(. 149 ) . , - -

- : , , , - .69

, - . , / (. 201, . 1 ).

70 , 71 . , . - : -, , /- . , - , : ex tunc72 ex nunc.

69 - (, ); ( , - , , ) ( culpa in eligendo culpa in vigilando). : ( ) ? - , , , . , . . , (2009), 92, 93. : , ,. , , 1986, 84.

70 . . . (2011), 25.

71 . 62 , - . , . , , , , . , , , 1999, 294 . , , . . . , ,, 2007,156. . M. Alini, D. Hrabar, D. Jakovac Lozi, A.Kora, Obiteljsko pravo, Zagreb 2006, 79.

72 extunc, . . (2009), 430 .


18/30

, LX, 1/2012

124

. , , , , -

, . - , . : ,

, , :73 -74 ( - ) , / ( ). , - , - . , , -. - , , ().

. (formadat esse rei) . lex commissoria

. , , ,

.75 . . 124 , - ,

73 je

, . , , 200/2012, 17.74 , -

. . 40 . 2 , () . . ( : ).

75 : , / - , . .

, (2009), 435.


19/30

. (. 107136)

125

() .76 , ? ,

.77

( , , , .), ,, . - , , , , ( , ) . , , , -

., . -

, compensatiodelicti. , - . , . , - : -

.78 () . , , .

.79 - / . - : (. 125 126) (. 131). -

76 . , , 1981, 203 .

77 () , -

, - . .

78 , . , . , , .

79 . , , 2005, 161; . (2009), 113; , , , 2009, 186. - : , ,

.


20/30

, LX, 1/2012

126

/ : , . , -

/: , - : .80 : . 130 , . - . , ( , ) . - //?81

82 rebus sic stantibus ( ).83 -

: (, ). (/ ) -

80 . , , , , ? -? : . , . . , . , - . 2005. : ; ( , ) . , , . . , (2009), 188191. , , .

81 - () ( x lege) / : (. - , , , 2000, 172 ) . 190 .

82 ( , ) , .

83 , , ,

, . . (2009), 414 .


21/30

. (. 107136)

127

. , . 133 , - .

( , . 32 ). / - . - - . , / , . -

: - . . -, .84

, : - ( / , ; , ,85 /-; ex ante) .

, .86 () .87 ( ) ()

84 () ().

85 rebus sic stantibus, , - /, .

86 . 1 : , ( 2), - , .

87 , , ,

, . . (1964), 110 .


22/30

, LX, 1/2012

128

( /), (

/).

/ , ( ), . , (/ ) , / , . .88

, . ,

. , , , . , .89 , .

, , . - , - , :

. -

, , - .90 , ;

( ?) , ;

, . , -

-. , ,

- , - .

, . ,

88 . . (2009), 362. : ; .

89 , ibid., 241 .

90 . . (2008), 29.


23/30

. (. 107136)

129

, de facto - . ;

, , ,91, - ...92 - , ( ) ( - ).93

-

. , .

94 animus donandi: . , . , / : , , -, , (

, ). - -

: -, .

-: ( ) ().

91 of nonfault grounds for divorce 1969. - //, . B. Hale, D. Pearl, E. Cooke,D. Monk, (2009), 156.

92 , , , .. (2010), 123.

93 , , . , , .. (2009), 182. , , .

94 : - , -

, . . , , 10/2005, 854.


24/30

, LX, 1/2012

130

. , , / -

. , - ( . 32 ). , in rerumnatura, , - , - . / - . : (, ,

, ). , :

, , /. - (, , ).95

96 , .

4. -

, , - ,97 / . - / . - , - , , . ,

in abstract in concreto . ( -) . - , .

95 . . , , 2010, 360 .

96 , -; ; , .

97 . , versus ,10/2010.


25/30

. (. 107136)

131

. , , . ,

.98 ( ) ,

() . , , , , .

. 6, . 1 , , , -

.99 - , , , / . , , , -

. .

100 . . , , : ( . 84,. 4 101 ) , .

98 , , 2011, 32.

99 , , , . ( , - ). , , - , (. 2). , - (. 11 ), . . . , (2011), 11, 25

. . , , 2/2011, 235262.

100 , Law Commission Report 192(1990), it is confusing and misleading; it isdiscriminatory and unjust; it distorts the parties bargaining positions; it provokes unnec-essary hostility and bitterness; it does nothing to save the marriag; it can make thingsworse for the children, . . Herring (2004), 9396.

101 , () . , . - . , ,

, .


26/30

, LX, 1/2012

132

( . 84, . 2 , , ). , -

,102

.103

, -. , . , . -, . .

: . , ( - ): ,, , . , -

. , , , -

. , - .

, , . , - , , , , , .

. -

102 . , -. , , , , , , . . (2004), 192 . , , .

103 . , . . --, , 2005, 151. , - /

, . . . (2011), 172.


27/30

. (. 107136)

133

( ), - .104

- , .105 , , 106 . . , , , . , , - : . , ,

. , ( ), o107 . ( ) . , ,

104 , , - : , , , . 90% -

. (, ), . Irena Majstorovi, Brani ugovor, Zagreb2005, 62.

105 , , . , - ? , , ? - ? ?

: / . , , , -, ? / . , . 351 in fine.

106 - , . M. Alini, et.al., (2006), 85. . K. Zupani, B. Novak, V. nidari Skubic,M. Konina Peternel,Reforma Druinskega prava, Ljubljana 2005, 31 .

107 , . , - , 1880, 188, 193.


28/30

, LX, 1/2012

134

.108 , ? , -

, , , , . - ( ), , , - .109

? , ( -) , ( , - /

) .110- 111 , , : / , / . .

,112 , , , , , . /, . - ( ,113 ),

108 , , , . , , , () (, , , -

, ).109. . , , 2007, 148151.

110 , II. , , (, . ..), .

111 , Deutilitate ex adversis capienda . , , , . . (1987), 8.

112. . (2009), 188192.

113 ,

: /


29/30

. (. 107136)

135

/ 114 . - , , ,

( - ).

. , , . . , , .115

, ?

, , , ?

-. .

- .

?

Dr. Slobodan I. Panov

Associate ProfessorUniversity of Belgrade Faculty of Law

GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE IN SECULAR LAW

Summary

The author made a detailed analysis of the grounds for divorce inthe secular and, in the expected article, in the ecclesiastical law. In meth-

, . , / ( , ). , , , , . . (1992), 168, 171.

114 . , /, , (, , ) .

115. (2006), 8385.


30/30

, LX, 1/2012

136

odology compatible to polymorphous marriage substance, basis of secularmarriage divorce is analyzed from three aspects. The first aspect is the oneof legal policy (in the amplitude of the conservative and liberal axiology).

The second is about the civil law background (records of similarities anddifferences with the obligation and legal institutions of termination fordefault; rebus sic stantibus, causes, usury contracts, etc. and hereditary-legal institutions, primarily the case of termination of life-long supportdue to bad relationships of parties). The third comprehends family lawaspects (expulsion of love from the marriage vocabulary in the law; irrel-evance of some causes, i.e. spouses guilt; concept of divorce by previousSerbian Law on Marriage and Family Relations, current Law on Familyand future Civil Code).

Key words: Divorce. Conservatism. Liberalism. Contract termi-nation. Rebus sic stantibus. Causa. Life support con-tract.

Documents

Slobodan Panov-Osnov Za Razvod Svetovnog Braka