Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SN Ia Rate Dependence on Host Galaxy Properties in Subaru SXDS and Implications for Delay Time Distribution
Jun Okumura (Kyoto Univ.)
Tomonori Totani (Kyoto Univ), Yutaka Ihara (Tokyo Univ.), Tomoki Morkuma (NAOJ), Mamoru Doi (Tokyo Univ.),
Naoki Yasuda (IPMU)
2010年7月26日月曜日
Type Ia Supernova• thermonuclear explosions of carbon-oxgen white dwarf
(WD) in binary systems
• The progenitor binary system leading to SNe Ia is still unknown
- single degenerate scenario (SD)
the accretion is from a non-degenerate companion star
- double degenerate scenario (DD)
a merger of two WDs results in a SNe Ia
2010年7月26日月曜日
Delay Time Distribution (DTD)
• SNe Ia are expected to have a wide range of delay times from star formation to supernova explosions, and the DTD can be used to discriminate the the proposed progenitor models
2010年7月26日月曜日
Delay Time Distribution (DTD)
• SNe Ia are expected to have a wide range of delay times form star formation to supernova explosions, and the DTD can be used to discriminate the the proposed progenitor models
- DD : the delay times is mainly determined by the from the formation of a DD binary to a merger after angular momentum loss by gravitational wave radiation
- power-law like DTD
tGW
2010年7月26日月曜日
Delay Time Distribution (DTD)
• SNe Ia are expected to have a wide range of delay times form star formation to supernova explosions, and the DTD can be used to discriminate the the proposed progenitor models
- DD : the delay times is mainly determined by the from the formation of a DD binary to a merger after angular momentum loss by gravitational wave radiation
- power-law like DTD
tGW
tIa ∼ tGW ∝ a4 a : separation
fsep(a) ∝ aβ
fD ∝ fsep(a)da
dtIa∝ t−(3−β)/4
Ia
2010年7月26日月曜日
Delay Time Distribution (DTD)
• SNe Ia are expected to have a wide range of delay times form star formation to supernova explosions, and the DTD can be used to discriminate the the proposed progenitor models
- SD : the delay time is essentially determined by the main-sequence lifetime of the secondary star in a binary
- some characteristic secondary mass scales preferred for successful SN Ia events
2010年7月26日月曜日
Totani+08• measured the SN Ia DTD in a delay time range of
0.1-8.0 Gyr by using faint variable objects detected in Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS)
• passive galaxy sample (already formed 90% of stars)
> delay time can be approximated by stellar age
• 65 SN candidates showing significant spatial offset fromthe nuclei of the host galaxies
• Power-law DTD at ~0.1-10Gyr
DTD ∝ t−1
2010年7月26日月曜日
Totani+08• measured the SN Ia DTD in a delay time range of
0.1-8.0 Gyr by using faint variable objects detected in Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS)
• passive galaxy sample (already formed 90% of stars)
> delay time can be approximated by stellar age
• 65 SN candidates showing significant spatial offset fromthe nuclei of the host galaxies
• Power-law DTD at ~0.1-10Gyr
DTD ∝ t−1
< tIa >=� tga0 tIaψ(tga − tIa)fD(tia)dtIa� tga
0 ψ(tga − tIa)fD(tIa)dtIa
2010年7月26日月曜日
DTD and Ia progenitor
- consistent with generic DTD features of DD models
- in SD case, observed DTD strongly constrain the parameter space of SD models
2010年7月26日月曜日
This Work• In Totani+08, only passive galaxies were selected and SN
Ia candidate were picked up as transient having significant offset so that DTD can be measured safely
> Motivation: would like to examine the DTD including all types of galaxies using SN Ia sample identified by LC fitting
• the correlation between SN Ia rate and host properties
• Investigate the correlation between SN Ia rate and host galaxy properties (SSFR, stellar mass, SFR) and test various DTD models/functions
2010年7月26日月曜日
This Work• In Totani+08, only passive galaxies were selected and SN
Ia candidate were picked up as transient having significant offset so that DTD can be measured safely
> Motivation: would like to examine the DTD including all types of galaxies using SN Ia sample identified by LC fitting
• the correlation between SN Ia rate and host properties
• Investigate the correlation between SN Ia rate and host galaxy properties (SSFR, stellar mass, SFR) and test various DTD models/functions
Mannucci+05Nearby (~100Mpc)
Sullivan+060.2 < z < 0.75
2010年7月26日月曜日
SXDS Data - Galaxy- wide (~1deg^2)
- multi-wavelength surveyoptical: B,V,Rc,i’,z(Subaru/Suprime-Cam)NIR: J, K (UKIDSS survey)IR: 3.6μm, 4.5μm (Spitzer/IRAC)X-ray: 0.5-2.0, 2.0-100keV (XMM-Newton)
• ~10 epochs during 2002/09-2005/09
• hyperz code
> SFH, stellar mass, Av
• > 69159 galaxieswave length
flu
x
Rc, i�, 3.6µm detection (mlim = 27.7, 27.7, 23.1)
2010年7月26日月曜日
SNe sample (Ihara+10, in prep)
• photometrically confirmed 46 SNe Ia (0.2 < z < 1.3)
- Light curve fitting with Hsiao+08 template
- in our galaxy sample > 39 SNe Ia Free parameter:• maximum brightness• stretch• redshift
2010年7月26日月曜日
testing DTD models• Power-law DTD
- Totani+08 DTD
- Pritchet+08 DTD
- index -1.5 DTD
• A+B model (Scannapieco & Bildsten 05)
SNR = AMtot(t) + Bψ(t)delayed prompt
DTD ∝ t−0.5(Pritchet + 08)
DTD ∝ t−1.08(Totani + 08)
Maoz+10
SNR =� t
0ψ(t�)DTD(t− t�) dt�
A = 11.7 [10−14yr−1 M−1⊙ ]
B = 12.1 [10−4M−1⊙ ]
2010年7月26日月曜日
Rate Calculation
• control time (CT) : detectable time of SN Ia
• SNR: Suprenova rate
- SN rate can be affected by dust extinction- photo-z Av (might be an overcorrection)- tried to see how extinction can affect the SN rate for
two extreme case (w/o extinction, photo-z Av)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
cont
rol t
ime
[day
]
redshift
Av 0.0Av 0.2Av 0.4Av 0.6Av 0.8Av 1.0Av 1.2Av 1.4Av 1.6Av 1.8Av 2.0
con
trol
tim
eredshift
SNR =Nobs
Σ CTi(z,AV )
Observation
Why extinction ?
2010年7月26日月曜日
result - stellar massSN
Ia R
ate
stellar mass
A+B Power-law DTD
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12
LOG
SN
Ia ra
te p
er g
alax
y [y
r-1]
stellar mass [Msun]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
This WorkSullivan+06
Neil+06Scannappieco ildsten 05
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12LO
G S
N Ia
rate
per
gal
axy
[yr-1
]
stellar mass [Msun]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
Totani+08 DTDPritchet+08 DTD
index -1.5 DTD
2010年7月26日月曜日
result - SFRSN
Ia R
ate
SFR
A+B Power-law DTD
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
LOG
SN
Ia ra
te p
er g
alax
y [y
r-1]
LOG SFR [Msun yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
This WorkSullivan+06
Neil+06Scannappieco ildsten 05 -4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5LO
G S
N Ia
rate
per
gal
axy
[yr-1
]
LOG SFR [Msun yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
Totani+08 DTDPritchet+08 DTD
index -1.5 DTD
2010年7月26日月曜日
result - SSFRSN
uM
SSFR
A+B Power-law DTD
-14
-13.5
-13
-12.5
-12
-11.5
-11
-10.5
-13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8LO
G S
NuM
[yr-1
Msu
n-1]
LOG SSFR[yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
Totani+08 DTDPritchet+08 DTD
index -1.5 DTD-14
-13.5
-13
-12.5
-12
-11.5
-11
-10.5
-13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8
LOG
SNu
M [y
r-1M
sun-1
]
LOG SSFR[yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
This WorkSullivan+06
Neil+06Scannapieco ildsten 05
2010年7月26日月曜日
A+B model• the values of A and B
- A+B model can reproduce the observation well, however, these value can be changed which field or populations we are looking on
- need a careful treatment when applied as universal DTD
Sullivan+06 Neil+06 Scannapieco&Bildsten05
A = 5.3+1.2−1.2
B = 3.9+0.7−0.7
A = 1.4+1.0−1.0
B = 8.0+2.6−2.6
A = 4.4+1.6−1.4
B = 26+11−11
A = 11.7 [10−14yr−1 M−1⊙ ]
B = 12.1 [10−4M−1⊙ ]
2010年7月26日月曜日
conclusion• the correlation between SN Ia rate and host galaxy
properties is confirmed at z=0.2-1.3
• extinction correction could affect the SN rate estimates significantly and must be carefully taken into account
• Totani+08 DTD is consistent with the data within the uncertainty of extinction, but Pritchet DTD seems to be shallow in SSFR-SNuM plot
• A+B model is also consistent with the data, but the AB values are significantly different among different samples/papers
2010年7月26日月曜日
2010年7月26日月曜日
SN Ia rate study in SXDS
• Ihara+10, in prep in collaboration with Supernova Cosmology Project
- SN Ia rates at 0.2 < z < 1.3
- Ia rate increases up to z~1.2
rV (z) = r0(1 + z)α
r0 = 0.20+0.08−0.05(stat.)+0.03
−0.04(syst.)× 10−4yr−1Mpc−3
α = 2.55+0.56−0.40(stat.)+0.22
−0.32(syst.)
2010年7月26日月曜日
sullivan+06stellar mass SFR
2010年7月26日月曜日
DTD
DTD models
Del
ay T
ime
Dis
trib
utio
n
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.1 1 10
SN Ia
DTD
[cen
tury
-1 (1
010L K
,0)-1
)]
Delay Time [Gyr]
index -1.0index -0.5index -1.5
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.1 1 10
SN Ia
DTD
[cen
tury
-1 (1
010L K
,0)-1
)]
Delay Time [Gyr]
index -1.0index -0.5index -1.5
w/o extinction w/extinction
2010年7月26日月曜日
SSFR
prompt & delayed components
late typeearly type
SNuM
-14
-13.5
-13
-12.5
-12
-11.5
-11
-10.5
-13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8
LOG
SNu
M [y
r-1M
sun-1
]
LOG SSFR[yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
Totani+08 DTDprompt
delayed
2010年7月26日月曜日
SSFR
A & B components
late typeearly type
SNuM
-14
-13.5
-13
-12.5
-12
-11.5
-11
-10.5
-13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8
LOG
SNu
M [y
r-1M
sun-1
]
LOG SSFR[yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
A+B modelA-componentB-component
2010年7月26日月曜日
SSFR
SSFR histogram
SSFR大late type
SSFR小early type
SNuM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8
Num
ber
LOG sSFR [yr-1]
SNe Iagalaxies / 1000
2010年7月26日月曜日
stellar massSN
Ia R
ate
prompt & delayed components
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12
LOG
SN
Ia ra
te p
er g
alax
y [y
r-1]
stellar mass [Msun]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
Totani+08 DTDprompt
delayed
2010年7月26日月曜日
stellar massSN
Ia R
ate
A & B components
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12
LOG
SN
Ia ra
te p
er g
alax
y [y
r-1]
stellar mass [Msun]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
A+B modelA-componentB-component
2010年7月26日月曜日
stellar massSN
Ia R
ate
stellar mass histogram
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Num
ber
LOG stellar mass [Msun]
SNe Iagalaxies / 1000
2010年7月26日月曜日
SFRSN
Ia R
ate
prompt & delayed components
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
LOG
SN
Ia ra
te p
er g
alax
y [y
r-1]
LOG SFR [Msun yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
Totani+08 DTDprompt
delayed
2010年7月26日月曜日
SFRSN
Ia R
ate
A & B components
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
LOG
SN
Ia ra
te p
er g
alax
y [y
r-1]
LOG SFR [Msun yr-1]
w/ extinctionw/o extinction
A+B modelA-componentB-component
2010年7月26日月曜日
SFRSN
Ia R
ate
SFR histogram
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Num
ber
LOG SFR [Msun yr-1]
SNe Iagalaxies / 1000
2010年7月26日月曜日
Mannucci+06
2010年7月26日月曜日
Mannucci+06
2010年7月26日月曜日
sed-sfr vs uv-sfrSE
D-S
FR
10-4
10-2
100
102
104
10-4 10-2 100 102 104
SED
-SFR
[Msu
n yr
-1]
UV-SFR [Msun yr-1]
z>0.466z<0.466SN host
UV-SFR
2010年7月26日月曜日
SFR vs stellar massSF
R
stellar mass
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011 1012 1013
UV-
SFR
[Msu
n yr
-1]
stellar mass [Msun]
galaxiesSN host
2010年7月26日月曜日
star extractionR
- 3
.6μm
R - i’
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
mR
-m3.
6 [m
ag]
mR-mi’ [mag]
extra-galacticgalactic
2010年7月26日月曜日
MB vs stretch-1
-22
-21.5
-21
-20.5
-20
-19.5
-19
-18.5
-18
-17.5 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3
MB
[mag
]
stretch-1
2010年7月26日月曜日
Rate Calculation
• control time (CT) : detectable time of SN Ia
• SNR: Suprenova rate
- Nexp = 37.61(Nobs = 39)- w/o extinction : Nexp = 71.87
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
cont
rol t
ime
[day
]
redshift
Av 0.0Av 0.2Av 0.4Av 0.6Av 0.8Av 1.0Av 1.2Av 1.4Av 1.6Av 1.8Av 2.0
con
trol
tim
eredshift
SNR =Nobs
Σ CTi(z,AV )
SNR =� t
0ψ(t�)DTD(t− t�) dt�
Observation
Model
Nexp = Σ SNRi · CTi
2010年7月26日月曜日