_soalusi soal 3-18

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    1/8

    SOALSOAL (PROBLEMS) - SOLUSIHansen & Mowen (2006)- E- Kls EA-E: [email protected]

    Edisi VI: 318

    1. Salaries:

    Senior accountantfixed

    Office assistantfixed

    Internet and software subscriptionsmixed

    Consulting by senior partnervariable

    Depreciation (equipment)fixed

    Suppliesmixed

    Administrationfixed

    Rent (offices)fixed

    Utilities

    mixed

    2. Internet and software subscriptions:

    V = (Y2Y1)/(X2X1)= ($850 $700)/(150 120) = $5 per hour

    F = Y2VX2= $850 ($5)(150) = $100

    Consulting by senior partner:

    V = (Y2Y1)/(X2X1)= ($1,500 $1,200)/(150 120) = $10 per hour

    F = Y2VX2= $1,500 ($10)(150) = $0

    Supplies:

    V = (Y2Y1)/(X2X1)= ($1,100 $905)/(150 120) = $6.50 per hour

    F = Y2VX2= $1,100 ($6.50)(150) = $125

    Utilities:

    V = (Y2Y1)/(X2X1)

    = ($365

    $332)/(150

    120) = $1.10 per hourF = Y2VX2

    = $365 ($1.10)(150) = $200

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    2/8

    318 Concluded

    3. UnitFixed Variable Cost

    Salaries:

    Senior accountant $2,500 $

    Office assistant 1,200 Internet and subscriptions 100 5.00Consulting 10.00Depreciation (equipment) 2,400 Supplies 125 6.50Administration 500 Rent (offices) 2,000 Utilities 200 1.10

    Total cost $9,025 $22.60

    Thus, total clinic cost = $9,025 + $22.60/professional hour

    For 140 professional hours:

    Clinic cost = $9,025 + $22.60(140) = $12,189

    Charge per hour = $12,189/140 = $87.06

    Fixed charge per hour = $9,025/140 = $64.46

    Variable charge per hour = $22.60

    4. For 170 professional hours:

    Charge/day = $9,025/170 + $22.60 = $53.09 + $22.60 = $75.69

    The charge drops because the fixed costs are spread over more professionalhours.

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    3/8

    319

    1. High (1,700, $21,000); Low (700, $15,000)

    V = (Y2Y1)/(X2X1)= ($21,000 $15,000)/(1,700 700) = $6 per receiving order

    F = Y2VX2= $21,000 ($6)(1,700) = $10,800

    Y = $10,800 + $6X

    2. Output of spreadsheet regression routine with number of receiving orders asthe independent variable:

    Constant 4512.98701298698

    Std. Err. of Y Est. 3456.24317476605

    R Squared 0.633710482694768No. of Observations 10

    Degrees of Freedom 8

    X Coefficient(s) 13.3766233766234

    Std. Err. of Coef. 3.59557461331427

    V = $13.38 per receiving order (rounded)

    F = $4,513 (rounded)

    Y = $4,513 + $13.38XR2= 0.634, or 63.4%

    Receiving orders explain about 63.4 percent of the variability in receiving cost,providing evidence that Tracys choice of a cost driver is reasonable. However,other drivers may need to be considered because 63.4 percent may not be strongenough to justify the use of only receiving orders (Menerima pesananmenjelaskan tentang 63,4 persen dari variabilitas dalam menerima biaya,memberikan bukti bahwa pilihan Tracy dari cost driver adalah wajar. Namun,driver lain mungkin perlu dipertimbangkan karena 63,4 persen mungkin tidakcukup kuat untuk membenarkan penggunaan hanya menerima pesanan)

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    4/8

    319 Continued

    3. Regression with pounds of material as the independent variable:

    Constant 5632.28109733183

    Std. Err. of Y Est. 2390.10628259277R Squared 0.824833789433823

    No. of Observations 10

    Degrees of Freedom 8

    X Coefficient(s) 0.0449642991356633

    Std. Err. of Coef. 0.0073259640055344

    V = $0.045 per pound of material delivered (rounded)

    F = $5,632 (rounded)Y = $5,632 + $0.045X

    R2= 0.825, or 82.5%

    Pounds of material delivered explains about 82.5 percent of the variability in receiving cost. This

    is a better result than that of the receiving orders and should convince Tracy to try multiple regression

    (Banyak Pon material yang disampaikan menjelaskan sekitar 82,5 persen dari variabilitas dalam

    menerima biaya. Ini adalah hasil yang lebih baik daripada menerima pesanan dan harus

    meyakinkan Tracy untuk mencoba regresi berganda)

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    5/8

    319 Concluded

    4. Regression routine with pounds of material and number of receiving orders as theindependent variables (Regresi rutin dengan pon bahan dan jumlah menerimaperintah sebagai variabel independen):

    Constant 752.104072925631

    Std. Err. of Y Est. 1350.46286973443

    R Squared 0.951068418023306

    No. of Observations 10

    Degrees of Freedom 7

    X Coefficient(s) 0.0333883151096915 7.14702865269395

    Std. Err. of Coef. 0.00495524841198368 1.68182916088492

    V1 = $0.033 per pound of material delivered (rounded)

    V2 = $7.147 per receiving order (rounded)

    F = $752 (rounded)

    Y = $752 + $0.033a + $7.147b

    R2= 0.95, or 95%

    Multiple regression with both variables explains 95 percent of the variability inreceiving cost. This is the best result (Regresi berganda dengan kedua variabelmenjelaskan 95 persen dari variabilitas dalam menerima biaya. Ini adalahhasil terbaik).

    3201. The order should cover the variable costs described in the cost formulas.

    These variable costs represent flexible resources.

    Materials ($94 20,000) $ 1,880,000Labor ($16 20,000) 320,000Variable overhead ($80 20,000) 1,600,000Variable selling ($7 20,000) 140,000

    Total additional resource spending $ 3,940,000Divided by units produced 20,000

    Total unit variable cost $ 197

    Garner should accept the order because it would cover total variable costsand increase income by $15 per unit ($212 $197), for a total increase of$300,000.

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    6/8

    320 Concluded

    2. The correlation coefficients indicate the reliability of the cost formulas. Of the four formulas,

    overhead activity may be a problem. A correlation coefficient of 0.75 means that only about 75 percent

    of the variability on overhead cost is explained by direct labor hours. This should have a bearing on the

    answer to Requirement 1 because if the percentage is low, there are activity drivers other than directlabor hours that are affecting variability in overhead cost. What these drivers are and how resource

    spending would change need to be known before a sound decision can be made (Koefisien korelasi

    menunjukkan keandalan rumus biaya. Dari empat rumus tersebut, aktivitas overhead yang

    mungkin menjadi masalah. Sebuah koefisien korelasi 0,75 berarti bahwa hanya sekitar 75 persen

    dari variabilitas biaya overhead dijelaskan oleh jam tenaga kerja langsung. Ini harus memiliki

    bantalan pada jawaban Kebutuhan 1 karena jika persentase rendah, ada aktivitas

    penggerak/driver selain jam tenaga kerja langsung yang mempengaruhi variabilitas dalam biaya

    overhead. Apa driver ini dan bagaimana pengeluaran sumber daya akan berubah perlu diketahui

    sebelum keputusan suara dapat dibuat).

    3. Resource spending attributable to order:

    Material ($94 20,000) $ 1,880,000Labor ($16 20,000) 320,000Variable overhead:

    ($85 20,000) 1,700,000($5,000 12) 60,000($300 600) 180,000

    Variable selling ($7 20,000) 140,000Total additional resource spending $ 4,280,000Divided by units produced 20,000

    Total unit variable cost $ 214

    The order would not be accepted now because it does not cover the variableactivity costs. Each unit would lose $2atau Urutan tidak akan diterima sekarangkarena tidak menutupi biaya kegiatan variabel. Setiap unit akan kehilangan $2 ($212 $214).

    It would also be useful to know the step-cost functions for any activities that haveresources acquired in advance of usage on a short-term basis. It is possible thatthere may not be enough unused activity capacity to handle the special order, andresource spending may also be affected by a need (which, in this case, would beunexpected) to expand activity capacity (Ini juga akan berguna untukmengetahui langkah-fungsi biaya untuk setiap kegiatan yang memiliki sumberdaya yang diperoleh di muka penggunaan secara jangka pendek. Adakemungkinan bahwa ada mungkin tidak cukup aktivitas kapasitas yang tidakterpakai untuk menangani pesanan khusus, dan pengeluaran sumber daya

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    7/8

    juga dapat dipengaruhi oleh kebutuhan (yang, dalam hal ini, akan menjadi takterduga) untuk memperluas kapasitas aktivitas).

    Ini solusi Tambahan untuk dipelajari. Dari edisi 6 (Hansen Mowen, 2006)3

    21

    1. High (2,000; $120,000); Low (1,200; $52,000)

    V = ($120,000 $52,000)/(2,000 1,200) = $85/nursing hour

    F = $52,000 ($85 1,200) = $50,000

    This problem illustrates how the high-low method can be misleading when costbehavior patterns have changed. Fortunately, in this case, the negative value offixed cost tells us that something is wrong (Masalah ini menggambarkanbagaimana metode tinggi-rendah dapat menyesatkan saat biaya pola perilaku

    telah berubah. Untungnya, dalam hal ini, nilai negatif dari biaya tetapmemberitahu kita bahwa ada sesuatu yang salah.

    2. a. Output of spreadsheet multiple regression routine:

    Constant 236.211171346831

    Std. Err. of Y Est. 1788.59942408259

    R Squared 0.993939842186014

    No. of Observations 14

    Degrees of Freedom 11

    X Coefficient(s) 40.8752113255057 35307.5122042085

    Std. Err. of Coef. 2.2207348945557 970.201096681915

    b. Output of spreadsheet regression routine on 2005 data:

    Constant 10081.3333333337

    Std. Err. of Y Est. 94.8068211329403

    R Squared 0.999887905585866

    No. of Observations 8Degrees of Freedom 6

    X Coefficient(s) 34.9533333333331

    Std. Err. of Coef. 0.151087766637518

  • 8/13/2019 _soalusi soal 3-18

    8/8

    321 Concluded

    c. Output of spreadsheet regression routine on 2006 data:

    Constant 19964.2403242688

    Std. Err. of Y Est. 12.0521931978647R Squared 0.999999089146329

    No. of Observations 6

    Degrees of Freedom 4

    X Coefficient(s) 50.0216788702923

    Std. Err. of Coef. 0.0238700194326353

    While each regression has a high R2, the multiple regression gives unacceptableresults. Notice the $35,308 coefficient on the independent variable changes. Yet,the increased fixed cost was only $10,000 per month. Regression (c) gives morereasonable results. The intercept term, $19,964, is roughly $10,000 higher than theintercept term for Regression (b), as expected. So, the hospital should useRegression (c) to budget for the rest of the year (Sementara regresi masing-masing memiliki R2 tinggi, regresi berganda memberikan hasil yang tidakdapat diterima. Perhatikan koefisien $ 35.308 pada variabel independenNamun "perubahan.", Biaya tetap meningkat hanya $ 10.000 per bulan.Regression (c) memberikan hasil yang lebih masuk akal. Istilah mencegat, $19.964, kira-kira $ 10.000 lebih tinggi daripada istilah intercept untuk Regresi(b), seperti yang diharapkan. Jadi, rumah sakit harus menggunakan Regresi

    (c) anggaran untuk sisa tahun ini).

    --- SELAMAT BELAJAR ---