Upload
daryl-flemmings
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Soybean Yield, Management and Physiology: Comparison
To Corn
North Central Branch, ASAMarch 16-17, 2005
Soybean Yield, Management and Physiology: Comparison
To Corn
North Central Branch, ASAMarch 16-17, 2005Emerson D. Nafziger
Crop SciencesUniversity of Illinois
Emerson D. NafzigerCrop Sciences
University of Illinois
Outline for TodayOutline for Today
• Current status of soybean yields
• Yield physiology
• Weather interactions
• Management issues
• Summary and “proposal”
• Current status of soybean yields
• Yield physiology
• Weather interactions
• Management issues
• Summary and “proposal”
Illinois Corn Yield
020406080
100120140160180200
1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Year
Yie
ld, b
u/ac
re
Illinois Soybean Yields
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1920 1940 1960 1980 2000Year
Yie
ld, b
u/ac
re
IL Corn:Soy Yield Ratio, 1920-2004
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Year
Rat
io,
bu
/ac:
bu
/ac
Yield Variability (CV) by IL CRD, 1990-04
0
5
10
15
20
25
NW NE W C E WSW ESE SW SE IL
Crop Reporting District
Yie
ld C
V, %
Corn
Soybean
Corn & Soy Acreage, NW MN
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Ac
res
, th
ou
sa
nd
s
Corn
Soybean
Yields, NW MN
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Bu
/acr
e
Corn
Soybean
C:S Yield Ratio, All MN
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04
All MN
NW MN CRD
Corn and Soybean Acreage in Illinois, 1990-2004
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005
Year
Acre
s, m
illio
ns
Soybean
Corn
For Soybean Yield, How High is “High”?
For Soybean Yield, How High is “High”?
• R. Cooper (in IL and OH) reported over 100 bu in sub-irrigated semi-dwarf types• 300K seeds/acre in 7-in rows
• The reported world record (Ray Rawson) is 118 in MI
• 100+ bu/acre in county strip test in NW Illinois in 1990 on a “virgin” field
• Highest county average yield was 57 bu/acre in 1998 in JoDaviess County and in 2002 and 2004 in Carroll County, both in NW Illinois
• Highest yield in the UI variety trials was 82 bu/acre at Perry in 2004
• Highest Illinois state avg yield is 50.5 (2004)
• R. Cooper (in IL and OH) reported over 100 bu in sub-irrigated semi-dwarf types• 300K seeds/acre in 7-in rows
• The reported world record (Ray Rawson) is 118 in MI
• 100+ bu/acre in county strip test in NW Illinois in 1990 on a “virgin” field
• Highest county average yield was 57 bu/acre in 1998 in JoDaviess County and in 2002 and 2004 in Carroll County, both in NW Illinois
• Highest yield in the UI variety trials was 82 bu/acre at Perry in 2004
• Highest Illinois state avg yield is 50.5 (2004)
Why Not Higher Soybean Yields?Why Not Higher Soybean Yields?
• A partial list, compared to corn: • Soybean has ~50 percent higher energy
content per lb of seed and 7% heavier bushels than corn
• It does photorespiration, losing up to 1/3rd of photosynthesis to this “useless” process
• It fixes some of its own N• It fills rapidly for ~30 days v 45-50 for corn• More sensitive to air pollutants(?)
• A partial list, compared to corn: • Soybean has ~50 percent higher energy
content per lb of seed and 7% heavier bushels than corn
• It does photorespiration, losing up to 1/3rd of photosynthesis to this “useless” process
• It fixes some of its own N• It fills rapidly for ~30 days v 45-50 for corn• More sensitive to air pollutants(?)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3-Jun 23-Jun 13-Jul 2-Aug 22-Aug 11-Sep 1-Oct 21-Oct
Date
LA
I
A3244(97)-54 bu
W82(97)-42 bu
A3244(98)-61 bu
W82(98)-42 bu
Urbana and Monmouth, 1999
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
3-Jun 3-Jul 2-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct
lb p
er a
cre
W82-plant
A 3244-plant
W82-seed
A 3244-seed
Yield v maturity date, Reg. 3, MG 3 RR, 2004Yield v maturity date, Reg. 3, MG 3 RR, 2004
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
9/5 9/10 9/15 9/20 9/25
Date of maturity
Yie
ld,
bu
/ac
Yield v maturity date, Reg. 3, RR, 2000Yield v maturity date, Reg. 3, RR, 2000
40
45
50
55
60
65
9/1 9/6 9/11 9/16 9/21 9/26 10/1
Maturity date
Yie
ld
Soybean Yield PhysiologySoybean Yield Physiology
• The ability to maintain high photosynthetic rates throughout seed filling stages defines high yield potential
• Among C3 crops, soybean has relatively high photosynthetic capacity
• The maximum sustained seed fill rate is ~3 bushels per day
• This fill rate sustains for ~30 days under normal temps; can be longer if cooler
• By far the largest reason for decreased Ps causing lower seed fill and yield is inadequate water
• The ability to maintain high photosynthetic rates throughout seed filling stages defines high yield potential
• Among C3 crops, soybean has relatively high photosynthetic capacity
• The maximum sustained seed fill rate is ~3 bushels per day
• This fill rate sustains for ~30 days under normal temps; can be longer if cooler
• By far the largest reason for decreased Ps causing lower seed fill and yield is inadequate water
A Mystery of Soybean Yield Physiology
A Mystery of Soybean Yield Physiology
• There is no clear indication whether soybean is “source-limited” (inadequate Ps) or “sink-limited” (not enough places to accept Ps products = sugars)
• This “confusion” may be of minimal importance as long as breeders can maintain progress, but it’s still of interest in the field
• There is no clear indication whether soybean is “source-limited” (inadequate Ps) or “sink-limited” (not enough places to accept Ps products = sugars)
• This “confusion” may be of minimal importance as long as breeders can maintain progress, but it’s still of interest in the field
Evidence for Source LimitationEvidence for Source Limitation
• Increasing CO2 in the atmosphere increases yields (SoyFACE & others)
• Ozone & other pollutants reduce yield
• Defoliation reduces yield, if it’s severe enough
• Drought reduces yield, often by reducing seed size
• Increasing CO2 in the atmosphere increases yields (SoyFACE & others)
• Ozone & other pollutants reduce yield
• Defoliation reduces yield, if it’s severe enough
• Drought reduces yield, often by reducing seed size
Evidence for Sink LimitationEvidence for Sink Limitation
• Removing some leaves increases Ps rate in remaining leaves
• Pale green (low chlorophyll) mutants yield more than Ps rates would suggest
• Leaves accumulate starch during the day; inability to utilize sugar fast enough?
• Adding N fertilizer (low fixation) fails to increase yields
• Removing some leaves increases Ps rate in remaining leaves
• Pale green (low chlorophyll) mutants yield more than Ps rates would suggest
• Leaves accumulate starch during the day; inability to utilize sugar fast enough?
• Adding N fertilizer (low fixation) fails to increase yields
“Practical” Yield Physiology“Practical” Yield Physiology
• With exceptions, soybean plants initiate enough seeds for high yields, but may fail to adequately sustain pods or fill seeds due to reduced Ps during critical stages (R5-R6)
• Canopies and leaves are usually adequate, but root systems often fail to provide enough water to maintain Ps
• With potential seedfilling rates of 3 bu/day, reductions in Ps for even short stretches in August hurt yields
• Starting to fill seeds slightly earlier or extending seedfilling slightly longer can increase yields greatly
• With exceptions, soybean plants initiate enough seeds for high yields, but may fail to adequately sustain pods or fill seeds due to reduced Ps during critical stages (R5-R6)
• Canopies and leaves are usually adequate, but root systems often fail to provide enough water to maintain Ps
• With potential seedfilling rates of 3 bu/day, reductions in Ps for even short stretches in August hurt yields
• Starting to fill seeds slightly earlier or extending seedfilling slightly longer can increase yields greatly
Days after flowering0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
R1R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8
Seed Filling
Pod Development
Flowering
Vegetative Growth
Soybean Reproductive Development
Indeterminate Growth
©Palle Pedersen
Seed and Pod DevelopmentSeed and Pod Development
©Palle Pedersen
R5 R6R8 (all)
R7 (1)
Freeport, Illinois
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ave
rag
e h
igh
tem
per
atu
re, F
2003
2004
Freeport, Illinois
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Av
era
ge
low
te
mp
era
ture
, F
2003
2004
Freeport, NW Illinois
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Ra
infa
ll, in
ch
es
2003 2004
Soybean management goals:Soybean management goals:
• To enable to crop to take full advantage of good weather when it happens
• To protect the yield of the crop, at least partly, from disastrously low yields when the weather is poor
• In practical terms, we need to “position” the crop for maximum seedfilling rates
• To enable to crop to take full advantage of good weather when it happens
• To protect the yield of the crop, at least partly, from disastrously low yields when the weather is poor
• In practical terms, we need to “position” the crop for maximum seedfilling rates
Planted Apr. 5Photo May 24
Planting Date & Rateave. 9 No. IL sites, 2001-03, mid-maturity, 4 seeding
rates
Planting Date & Rateave. 9 No. IL sites, 2001-03, mid-maturity, 4 seeding
rates
42.4
47.9 47.9
45.8
40
42
44
46
48
50
Early Apr Late Apr Early May Late May
Planting Date
Ave
. Yie
ld, b
pa
Effect of Planting Date on Maturity and Plant Height
(response to day length)
Effect of Planting Date on Maturity and Plant Height
(response to day length)
Planting Date
Maturity Date
Plant Height-in.
April 11 Sept. 16 28.9
April 24 Sept. 17 30.5
May 11 Sept. 22 31.6
May 29 Sept. 28 33.2
Monmouth
Planting Date and Seeding Rate
Data from J. Gander, Pioneer Hi-BredData from J. Gander, Pioneer Hi-Bred
E. Central Illinois, 4 yr
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
50 100 150 200 250
Seeding rate, 000/acre
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
Mid-Apr
E. May
Mid-May
E. June
Planting Date and Seeding Rate
University of IllinoisUniversity of Illinois
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
50 100 150 200 250
Seeding rate, 000/acre
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
6-Apr
24-Apr
9-May
26-May
Planting Rate and Variety
Data from J. Gander, Pioneer Hi-BredData from J. Gander, Pioneer Hi-Bred
East Central Illinois
30
35
40
45
50
55
50 100 150 200 250
Seeding rate, 000/acre
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
92B74
92B84
93B01
93B26
93B36
93B47
Seeding Rate and Row Spacing
E. Adee, University of IllinoisE. Adee, University of Illinois
Avg of 14 Site-Years, N. IL
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
100 125 150 175 200 225 250
Seeding rate, 000/acre
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
Drill
15-inch
30-inch
Seeding Rate and Row Spacing
P. Pedersen, Iowa State Univ.P. Pedersen, Iowa State Univ.
Iowa, 3 site-years, 2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
50 100 150 200 250
Seeding rate, 000s/acre
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
15-inch
30-inch
Seeding Rate Economics
University of IllinoisUniversity of Illinois
$15.00/125K unit; $5.00 per bu soybean
30
35
40
45
50
50 100 150 200 250
Seeding rate, 000/acre
Yie
ld,
bu
/acr
e
↑ Optimum
Variety Maturity & Planting Date, 2001-03
Avg. of 9 N. Ilinois Trials
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Early Apr Late Apr Early May Late May
Planting date
Yie
ld,
bu
/ac
re
Early
Mid
Late
Inoculants on Soybean, 2004
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
North Central South Average
Illinois locations (2 per region)
Yie
ld,
bu
/acr
e
Untreated
Optimize
Launcher
Prosurge
Lactofen on Soybean, Urbana, 2004
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Control Cobra Phoenix
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
Planting ManagementPlanting Management
• 100,000 plants per acre is enough to maximize yield, if they’re all healthy and evenly distributed
• Variety, varietal maturity, row spacing, and planting date don’t seem to affect seeding rate/plant population response much
• Good quality soybean seed responds little if any to seed fungicidal seed treatment or inoculant
• Planting in the first half of May is appropriate for soybean, with little loss 1-2 weeks on either side of that period
• 100,000 plants per acre is enough to maximize yield, if they’re all healthy and evenly distributed
• Variety, varietal maturity, row spacing, and planting date don’t seem to affect seeding rate/plant population response much
• Good quality soybean seed responds little if any to seed fungicidal seed treatment or inoculant
• Planting in the first half of May is appropriate for soybean, with little loss 1-2 weeks on either side of that period
Monmouth Rotation, 2002-04
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
WCS CWS SSS CS
Rotation
So
ybea
n y
ield
Tilled
No-till
Monmouth CCS Soybean, 2004
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
CCS CS
Rotation
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
93B67 HY
93B47 DEF
6 Illinois Soybean Sites, 2000-03
44
45
46
47
48
No-Till Chisel Deep Rip
Yie
ld, b
u/a
cre
Spr NT
Spr Till
According to Some…According to Some…
High corn yields are an accomplishment
While
High soybean yields are an accident
High corn yields are an accomplishment
While
High soybean yields are an accident
Now We Know Better!Now We Know Better!
• Still, it’s clear that managing soybean within our weather and soils will disappoint sometimes
• But, the US remains a good place to grow soybeans, and with continued attention to genetics and inputs, we can continue to compete
• Still, it’s clear that managing soybean within our weather and soils will disappoint sometimes
• But, the US remains a good place to grow soybeans, and with continued attention to genetics and inputs, we can continue to compete
Seedfill Monitoring in SoybeanSeedfill Monitoring in Soybean
• As a pilot in 2005, we are going to take weekly samples of soybean pods from 25-30 plants
• Dry and thresh to determine seed wt per plant
• Relate ΔDW to temperature, moisture, and solar radiation during past week
• Care to join us? [email protected]
• As a pilot in 2005, we are going to take weekly samples of soybean pods from 25-30 plants
• Dry and thresh to determine seed wt per plant
• Relate ΔDW to temperature, moisture, and solar radiation during past week
• Care to join us? [email protected]
Thank YouThank You