STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL …envis.praha-mesto.cz/(blcy3g45jv5km23u5btg25mk)/rocenky/Pr_01pdf/kap_B3.pdf133 / LANDSCAPE Prahy Hall Druh pozemku podle kategorií katastru

WATER

VODA

ATMOSPHEREOVZDUŠÍ

LANDSCAPE

KRAJINA

WASTEODPADY

NOISEHLUK

STATE AND DEVELOPMENT

OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMPARTMENTS

STAV A VÝVOJ SLOZEKZIVOTNÍHO PROSTØEDÍ

¡¡

VybranÈ informaËnÌ zdroje (publikace, internet)

Magistr·t hl. m. Prahy ñ www.mesto-praha.czï Publikace roËenka Praha ñ ûivotnÌ prost¯edÌ (tato publikace, vyd·v·na od r. 1990), CD-ROM Praha ñ ûivotnÌ

prost¯edÌ (vyd·ny jiû 4 od roku 1997, aktu·lnÌ CD-ROM Praha éP 4 vyd·n v roce 2001, elektronickÈ verze roËeneka jin˝ch publikacÌ, mapy).

ï HlavnÌ str·nky hl. m. Prahy ñ www.praha-mesto.cz ñ éP v rubrice ÑChci vÏdÏtì ñ ÑûivotnÌ prost¯edÌì. Publikacea roËenky: www.praha-mesto.cz/zp/rocenky, Atlas éP: www.premis.cz/atlaszp, resp. www.wmap.cz/atlaszp,PREMIS, Praûsk˝ ekologick˝ monitorovacÌ a informaËnÌ systÈm (ovzduöÌ): www.premis.cz, EIA v Praze:www.monet.cz/eia, Neûiv· p¯Ìroda Prahy a jejÌho okolÌ (geologie): www.monet.cz/atlas aj.

»esk˝ hydrometeorologick˝ ˙stav ñ www.chmi.czï Publikace ñ ZneËiötÏnÌ ovzduöÌ na ˙zemÌ »eskÈ republiky ñ RoËenka ñ str·nky ⁄seku ochrany Ëistoty ovzduöÌ

(www.chmi.cz/uoco/oco_main.html), akt. vyd·nÌ ZneËiötÏnÌ ovzduöÌ na ˙zemÌ »eskÈ republiky v roce 2000 ñRoËenka (vyd. 2001), ZneËiötÏnÌ ovzduöÌ a atmosfÈrick· depozice v datech ñ Tabel·rnÌ p¯ehled ñ str·nky ⁄sekuochrany Ëistoty ovzduöÌ (www.chmi.cz/uoco/oco_main.html), akt. vyd·nÌ: ZneËiötÏnÌ ovzduöÌ a atmosfÈrick·depozice v datech, »esk· republika 2000 (vyd. 2001).

ï Publikace ñ Hydrologick· roËenka (akt. vyd·nÌ: Hydrologick· roËenka 2000, vyd. 2001), Jakost povrchov˝cha podzemnÌch vod v »R (akt. vyd·nÌ: Jakost povrchov˝ch a podzemnÌch vod v »R 2000, vyd. 2001 na CD-ROM).

ï OvzduöÌ ñ Aktu·lnÌ stav ovzduöÌ ñ (Automatizovan˝ imisnÌ monitoring AIM)Seznam stanic AIM, MÏ¯enÌ AIM: www.chmi.cz/uoco/act/aim/aregion/aim_region.html.

ï OvzduöÌ ñ Informace o kvalitÏ ovzduöÌ v »RSt¯ednÏdob· data (mÏsÌËnÌ, ËtvrtletnÌ a roËnÌ tabel·rnÌ p¯ehledy): www.chmi.cz/uoco/isko/rdata/tab.htm.ZneËiötÏnÌ v datech (tabel·rnÌ roËenky): www.chmi.cz/uoco/isko/tab_roc/tab_roc.html.Zdroje zneËiöùov·nÌ: www.chmi.cz/uoco/data/emise/gnavemise.html.

ï OvzduöÌ ñ V˝voj zneËiötÏnÌ ovzduöÌ (grafy)EmisnÌ bilance »eskÈ republiky: www.chmi.cz/uoco/isko/emise/emise.html.Mapy zneËiötÏnÌ (ZneËiötÏnÌ ovzduöÌ na ˙zemÌ »R ñ roËenka www.chmi.cz/uoco/isko/gr98cz/start.htm.St¯ednÏdob˝ v˝voj (St¯ednÏdobÈ grafickÈ p¯ehledy): www.chmi.cz/uoco/isko/rdata/grafy.htm.

ï Voda ñ ReûimovÈ informace: www.chmi.cz/hydro/nshydro.html ñ ˙daje o mnoûstvÌ a jakosti povrchov˝ch apodzemnÌch vod.

ï Voda ñ OperativnÌ informace: www.chmi.cz/hydro/SRCZ04.html ñ stavy vody na tocÌch »R.

»esk˝ ekologick˝ ˙stav ñ www.ceu.czï InformaËnÌ systÈm o odpadech: http://keao.ceu.cz/iso. Odpady vyk·zanÈ v v letech 1994ñ1997, roce 1997 a

v n·sledujÌcÌch letech, za¯ÌzenÌ k ˙pravÏ, vyuûitÌ a zneökodnÏnÌ odpad˘.ï Mapy registru kontaminovan˝ch ploch ñ GIS: http://gis.ceu.cz/RKP/Default.htm (ve spolupr·ci s ⁄KZ⁄Z).

Ministerstvo ûivotnÌho prost¯edÌ ñ www.env.czï Publikace Zpr·va o ûivotnÌm prost¯edÌ »eskÈ republiky v roce (aktu·lnÌ vyd·nÌ: Zpr·va o ûivotnÌm prost¯edÌ

»eskÈ republiky v roce 1999), Statistick· roËenka éP »R (akt. vyd·nÌ: Statistick· roËenka éP »R 2000 ñpozn.: ˙daje za rok 1999 a p¯edchozÌ roky), Stav éP v jednotliv˝ch krajÌch »eskÈ republiky (akt. vyd·nÌ ñ 2001,stav za rok 2000, d¯Ìve za ˙zemnÌ odbory MéP).

ï Br·na k informacÌm o ûivotnÌm prost¯edÌ ñ http://infozp.env.cz. Jednotn˝ informaËnÌ systÈm o ûivotnÌm pro-st¯edÌ na internetu (odbornÈ i administrativnÌ informace, metadata, indik·tory), pilotnÌ verze od 1. 1. 2002.

ï Ochrana ûivotnÌho prost¯edÌ ñ www.env.cz/env.nsf/ochrana?OpenFrameSet.

»esk˝ statistick˝ ˙¯ad ñ www.czso.czï Publikace: Informace o ûivotnÌm prost¯edÌ v »eskÈ republice (aktu·lnÌ vyd·nÌ za obdobÌ 1994ñ1999, pozn.:

vyd. 2000). Produkce, ˙prava, vyuûitÌ a zneökodnÏnÌ odpad˘ v roce.ï Informace k tÈmat˘m éivotnÌ prost¯edÌ, zemÏdÏlstvÌ: www.czso.cz/cz/cisla/2/2.htm.

P¯ehled informaËnÌch zdroj˘ na internetu je uveden tÈû v kapitole D6.

B3 KRAJINA

B3.1 BILANCE PLOCH A EVIDENCEZELENÃ ñ REGISTR POVRCHYA ZELE“

Jako souË·st datovÈ z·kladny InformaËnÌho systÈmuo ûivotnÌm prost¯edÌ v Praze (IOéIP) byl v roce 1995zpracov·n registr Povrchy a zeleÚ, kter˝ obsahuje˙daje o jednotliv˝ch parcel·ch a agregovanÈ ˙dajeza katastr·lnÌ ˙zemÌ. Tyto ˙daje byly prezentov·nyv publikaci Povrchy a zeleÚ ñ bilance za katastr·lnÌ˙zemÌ (IMIP, 1995) jejÌû n·klad je jiû rozebr·n.DalöÌ aktualizace registru se neprov·dÌ p¯edevöÌmz d˘vod˘ vÏcnÈ a finanËnÌ n·roËnosti.

V souËasnÈ dobÏ jsou k dispozici pouze aktuali-zovanÈ ˙daje katastru nemovitostÌ. V n·sledujÌ-cÌch tabulk·ch jsou uvedeny ˙hrnnÈ hodnoty druh˘pozemk˘ (⁄HDP) za celÈ ˙zemÌ Prahy pro obdobÌ1991ñ2000. RozËlenÏnÌ p˘dnÌho fondu se prov·dÌpodle jednotliv˝ch kategoriÌ druh˘ pozemk˘ ka-tastru nemovitostÌ.

B3 LANDSCAPE

B3.1 LAND BALANCE ANDREGISTRATION OF GREENERY ñTHE REGISTER OF LANDSAND GREENERY

In 1995 as a part of the database of the Prague Envi-ronmental Information System (IOéIP) the Registerof Lands and Greenery was developed, which includesdata on particular plots and aggregated data oncadastral districts. These data were presented inthe publication Lands and Greenery ñ Balance byCadastral Districts (IMIP, 1995), which is alreadysold out. The Register has not been further updatedmostly due to factual and financial demands thereof.

At present there are only updated data of the cadastreof real estates available. The following tables containsummaries on land types (⁄HDP) over the entireterritory of Prague for 1991ñ2000. The categori-sation of land resources is made according to indi-vidual categories of land type of the cadastre ofreal estates.

Magistr·t hl. m. Prahy 131 PRAHA ñ éivotnÌ prost¯edÌ 2001Prague City Hall PRAGUE ñ Environment 2001

B3 KRAJINA / LANDSCAPE

Tab. B3.1 ⁄hrnnÈ hodnoty druh˘ pozemk˘ [ha]Aggregate areas of land types [ha]

Druh pozemku 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Land typeZemÏdÏlsk· p˘da 21 419 21 364 21 341 21 344 21 330 21 352 21 382 21 287 21 221 Farmlandñ orn· p˘da 15 776 15 717 15 694 15 664 15 693 15 727 15 766 15 686 15 616 ñ arable landñ vinice 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ñ vineyardsñ zahrady 4 011 4 010 4 013 4 013 4 011 4 004 4 012 4 002 4 001 ñ gardensñ ovocnÈ sady 742 747 747 775 736 729 725 723 718 ñ orchardsñ trvalÈ travnÌ

porosty880 880 877 882 880 882 869 866 876 ñ permanent

grasslandLesnÌ p˘da 4 852 4 851 4 852 4 848 4 867 4 866 4 893 4 893 4 878 Forest landVodnÌ plochy 1 072 1 072 1 070 1 070 1 066 1 066 1 080 1 057 1 057 Water bodiesZastavÏnÈ plochy 4 341 4 422 4 494 4 531 4 572 4 611 4 683 4 719 4 766 Built-up areasOstatnÌ plochy** 17 929 17 904 17 855 17 819 17 783 17 745 17 549 17 628 17 667 Other lands**Celkov· v˝mÏra* 49 613 49 613 49 612 49 612 49 618 49 640 49 587 49 584 49 589 Total area*

* RozdÌly v celkovÈ v˝mÏ¯e jsou zp˘sobeny zaokrouhlov·nÌm / Differences in total area are caused by rounding** OstatnÌ plochy zahrnujÌ i staveniötÏ / Other lands also include construction sites Zdroj / Source: »⁄ZK

Obr. B3.1 ⁄bytky a p¯Ìr˘stky ploch podle druh˘ pozemk˘Decrements and increments of aggregate areas of different land types

Zdroj / Source: »⁄ZK

500

ha

400300

200100

ñ100

ñ200

ñ300

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 20001999ñ400

0

600

zemÏdÏlsk· p˘dafarmlandlesnÌ p˘daforest landvodnÌ plochywater bodieszastavÏnÈ plochybuilt-up areasostatnÌ plochyother lands

132


Magistrát hl. m. PrahyPrague City Hall

Ob

r.B

3.2

Pøe

hle

dkata

str

áln

ích

územ

ív

hl.

m.P

raze

HO

RN

ÍPO

ÈE

RN

ICE

BÌ

CH

OV

ICE

KLÁ

NO

VIC

E

ÚJE

ZD

N.L

ES

Y

SA

TALI

CE

KB

ELY

VIN

OØ

DO

LNÍ

PO

ÈE

RN

ICE

KY

JE

ŠT

ÌR

BO

HO

LY

HO

STA

VIC

E

DO

LNÍ

MÌ

CH

OLU

PY

DU

BE

È

ÈA

KO

VIC

E

MIŠ

KO

VIC

E

TØ

EB

OR

AD

ICE

ÈE

RN

ÝM

OS

T

VY

SO

ÈA

NY HLO

UB

ÌT

ÍN

PR

OS

EKLE

TÒ

AN

Y

HR

DLO

ØE

ZY

ST

RA

ŠN

ICE

MA

LEŠ

ICE

HO

ST

IVA

Ø

BØ

EZ

INÌ

VE

S

ÏÁ

BLI

CE

LIB

EÒ

KO

BY

LIS

Y

KA

RLÍ

N

HO

LEŠ

OV

ICE

VIN

OH

RA

DY

VR

ŠO

VIC

E

SE

DLE

CBO

HN

ICEÈ

IMIC

EDO

LNÍC

HA

BR

Y

BU

BE

NE

ÈTR

OJA

SM

ÍCH

OV

NO

VÉ

MÌ

ST

O

JOS

EF

OV

MA

LÁS

TR

AN

A

HR

AD

ÈA

NY

STA

RÉ

MÌ

ST

O

LYS

OLA

JE

SU

CH

DO

L

VE

LES

LAV

ÍN

NE

BU

ŠIC

E

VO

KO

VIC

E

DE

JVIC

E

ST

ØE

ŠO

VIC

E

KO

ŠÍØ

E

BØ

EV

NO

V

MO

TO

L

PØ

ED

NÍ

KO

PA

NIN

A

RU

ZY

NÌ

DO

LNÍ

LIB

OC

SO

BÍN

ZLI

ÈÍN

ØE

PY

HÁ

JEK K

RÁ

LOV

ICE

KO

LOV

RA

TY

NE

DV

ÌZ

Í

LIP

AN

Y

BE

NIC

E

HO

RN

ÍM

ÌC

HO

LUP

Y

UH

ØÍN

ÌV

ES

PE

TR

OV

ICE

ZÁ

BÌ

HLI

CE

KO

LOD

ÌJE

KØ

ES

LIC

E

PIT

KO

VIC

E

ŠE

BE

RO

V

HÁ

JE

ÚJE

ZD

CH

OD

OV

KU

NR

AT

ICE

PÍS

NIC

E

LIB

UŠ

RA

DLI

CEV

YŠ

EH

RA

D NU

SLE

PO

DO

LÍM

ICH

LE

CH

OLU

PIC

E

MO

DØ

AN

Y

TO

ÈN

Á

KR

ÈB

RA

NÍK LH

OT

KA

KA

MÝ

K

HO

DK

OV

IÈK

Y

KO

MO

ØA

NY

LIP

EN

CE

LAH

OV

ICE

ZB

RA

SLA

V

RA

DO

TÍNJI

NO

NIC

E

HO

LYN

Ì

HLU

BO

ÈE

PY

MA

LÁC

HU

CH

LE

SLI

VE

NE

C

VE

LKÁ

CH

UC

HLE

LOC

HK

OV

TØ

EB

ON

ICE

ST

OD

ÙLK

Y

ØE

PO

RY

JE

ZA

DN

ÍK

OP

AN

INA

Zdr

oj/

MH

MP

Sourc

e:

Overv

iew

of

cad

astr

ald

istr

icts

inth

eC

ity

of

Pra

gu

e

PRAHA – Zivotní prostøedí 2001PRAGUE – Environment 2001

¡

ZIZ

KO

V¡

¡

ST

ØÍZ

KO

V¡

133



Zdro

j/

:M

HM

PS

ourc

e

Zem

ìdìls

ká

pùda

[%]

0–

10

10

–20

20

–30

30–

40

40

–50

50–

60

60–

70

70

–80

80–

90

90

–100

Agricultura

lla

nd

[%]

Dru

hp

ozem

ku

podle

kate

goriíkata

str

unem

ovitostí

10

0%

Lan

dlo

tty

pe

usin

gth

eR

ealE

sta

teC

adastr

alR

egis

ter

cla

ssific

ation

built

-up

are

as

woods

and

fore

sts

agricultura

lla

nd

wate

rare

as

oth

er

are

as

zasta

vìné

plo

chy

lesnípùda

zem

ìdìls

ká

pùda

vodníplo

chy

osta

tníplo

chy

Ob

r.B

3.3

Dru

hp

ozem

ku

po

dle

kate

go

riíkata

str

un

em

ovit

ostí

,2000

Lan

dty

pes

by

cate

go

ryo

fth

ecad

astr

eo

fre

alesta

tes,2000


¡

B3.2 OCHRANA PÿÕRODYA KRAJINY

Odbor ûivotnÌho prost¯edÌ Magistr·tu hl. m. Prahyv r·mci zajiöùov·nÌ agendy danÈ z·konem Ë. 114/1992Sb., o ochranÏ p¯Ìrody a krajiny, v platnÈm znÏnÌ,dos·hl n·sledujÌcÌch v˝sledk˘:

ï K 1. 7. 2001 byl provedena aktualizace mapv M 1 : 10000 ÑOchrana p¯Ìrody a krajinyì, kterÈjsou vyuûÌv·ny OéP MHMP, ale takÈ ⁄M»Praha 1 ñ 22 pro vedenÌ agendy danÈ z·konem.ZpracovanÈ vrstvy GIS jsou k dispozici tÈû nainternetov˝ch str·nk·ch MHMP a poskytujÌtak vÌce neû r·mcov˝ p¯ehled o ochranÏ ˙zemÌhl. m. Prahy, kter· vych·zÌ ze z·kona.

ï Za poslednÌ rok bylo vyhl·öeno 32 pam·tn˝chstrom˘. Celkov˝ poËet vyhl·öen˝ch pam·tn˝chstrom˘ se tak zv˝öil na 89 exempl·¯˘. Pr˘bÏûnÏprobÌh· vyhlaöov·nÌ dalöÌch evidovan˝ch pam·t-n˝ch strom˘. Pro vöechny vyhl·öenÈ stromy bylzpracov·n n·vrh pÏstebnÌch opat¯enÌ se specifi-kacÌ technologie oöet¯enÌ a nalÈhavosti z·sahu.Na podzim 2000 probÏhla realizace 34 pÏsteb-nÌch z·sah˘, do konce roku 2001 bude oöet¯enodalöÌch 17 pam·tn˝ch strom˘.

ï Do 1. 9. 2001 bylo podle ß 6 z·kona registrov·no17 v˝znamn˝ch krajinn˝ch prvk˘. Tato ochranaje zajiöùov·na zejmÈna pro v˝znamnÈ stepnÌ amok¯adnÌ lokality. Cenn˝m podkladem, na jehoûz·kladÏ jsou vyhled·v·na ekologicky v˝znamn·spoleËenstva, je vegetaËnÌ mapa hl. m. Prahy.

ï Pro zvl·ötÏ chr·nÏn· ˙zemÌ jsou zpracov·v·ny,projedn·v·ny a schvalov·ny pl·ny pÈËe. Doposudbyl z celkovÈho poËtu 77 ˙zemÌ pl·n pÈËe schv·-len pro 69 lokalit. Zb˝v· projednat 6 pl·n˘ a dvabudou dokonËeny z·vÏrem letoönÌho roku.

PokraËovalo zpracov·v·nÌ dokumentacÌ vyhodno-cenÌ krajinnÈho r·zu a n·vrhu regulativ˘ ve smysluß 12 z·kona. Doposud je tato dokumentace zpra-cov·na pro p¯ÌrodnÌ parky Drah·Ú ñ Troja, ä·rka ñLysolaje a KoöÌ¯e ñ Motol. V letoönÌm roce pro-bÌhajÌ pr·ce na dokumentacÌch pro parky Rokytka,Hostiva¯ ñ Z·bÏhlice, BotiË ñ MilÌËov a Mod¯ansk·rokle ñ Cholupice.

B3.2 NATURE CONSERVATIONAND LANDSCAPE PROTECTION

The Department of the Environment of the PragueCity Hall, within the agenda established by theAct No. 114/1992 Code, on nature conservationand landscape protection as amended, has attainedresults as the follows:

ï By July 7, 2001 the updating of maps 1 : 100,000in scale of the set Nature Conservation andLandscape Protection, which are used by theOéP MHMP and also by the Local Authorities ofthe City Districts Prague 1 ñ 22 for keeping theagenda pursuant to the Act. The GIS layers de-veloped are also available at the internet pagesof the Prague City Hall and provide more thanmerely a global overview on the conservation andprotection activities on the territory of Prague,based on the Act again.

ï In the last year 32 memorial trees were established.The total number of established memorial treeswas therefore increased to 89 specimens. Theestablishing of further registered memorial treeshas been ongoing. Each established tree has itsown proposal for silvicultural measures speci-fying technology of care and degree of urgencyfor a particular action. In autumn 2000 34 silvi-cultural actions, and by the end 2001 further17 memorial trees should be treated.

ï 17 significant landscape elements were registeredby September 1, 2001 pursuant to Section 6 of theAct. This protection has been provided namelyto important localities of steppes and wetlands.The precious background material on the basisof which the ecologically important communi-ties are sought is the Vegetation Map of the Cityof Prague.

ï Care Plans have been developed, discussed, andapproved for areas of special protection. Out ofthe total number of 77 areas there were 69 CarePlans approved, 6 plans are under procedure,and 2 shall be developed by the end of this year.

Works on documentation of landscape characterand proposals of regulation measures in accordancewith Section 12 of the Act were continuously inprogress. This documentation was completed forthe nature parks: Drah·Ú ñ Troja, ä·rka ñ Lysolaje,and KoöÌ¯e ñ Motol so far. This year works on thedocumentation of the territories of nature parksRokytka, Hostiva¯ ñ Z·bÏhlice, BotiË ñ MilÌËov, andMod¯ansk· Gorge ñ Cholupice have been made.

PRAHA ñ éivotnÌ prost¯edÌ 2001 134 Magistr·t hl. m. PrahyPRAGUE ñ Environment 2001 Prague City Hall


Tab. B3.2 P¯ehled vyhl·öen˝ch pam·tn˝ch strom˘List of established memorial trees

N·zevName

Katastr·lnÌ ˙zemÌCadastral

district

ParcelaPlot

OchrannÈ p·smoProtection zone

DruhSpecies

ksNum-ber

Dub uhersk˝ v ItalskÈ uliciHungarian oak in Italsk· Street

Vinohrady 2267/1 Z Quercus frainetto 1

Jinan v Kr·lovskÈ obo¯eMaiden hair tree in Kr·lovsk· obora

BubeneË 1772/1 Z Ginkgo biloba 1

Tis v rajskÈm dvo¯e u Frantiök·n˘Common yew in the Paradise Courtat the Franciscans

StarÈ MÏsto 663 Z Taxus baccata 1

Dub v DolnÌch ChabrechCommon oak in DolnÌ Chabry

DolnÌ Chabry 541 Z Quercus robur 1

Stromo¯adÌ v ul. GagarinovaAlley in Gagarin Street

Suchdol 2383 Z Tilia cordata 18

Dva duby v ToËnÈTwo common oaks in ToËn·

ToËn· 409 Z Quercus robur 2

Dub v Kl·novicÌchCommon oak in Kl·novice

Kl·novice 677 Z Quercus robur 1

Dub Nad V˝öinkouCommon oak Nad V˝öinkou

SmÌchov 3690 Z Quercus robur 1

Cedr Na Balk·nÏAtlas cedar Na Balk·nÏ

VysoËany 1919/1 Z Cedrus atlantica 1

LÌpa Na äabatceSmall-leaved lime Na äabatce

Komo¯any 687/1 Z Tilia cordata 1

Platan u Velkop¯evorskÈho pal·cePlane tree at Velkop¯evorsk˝ Palace

Mal· Strana 249 Z Platanus x acerifolia 1

Platan v zahradÏ Kinsk˝chPlane tree in Kinsk˝ Garden

SmÌchov 3134 Z Platanus x acerifolia 1

Dub v NedvÏzÌCommon oak in NedvÏzÌ

NedvÏzÌ 245 Z Quercus robur 1

Jasan u ökoly v B·rtlovÏ ul.European ash at the school in B·rtlova Street

HornÌ PoËernice 191 Z Fraxinus excelsior 1

Platan na KarlovÏ n·mÏstÌPlane tree at Karlovo n·mÏstÌ

NovÈ MÏsto 2418/1 Z Platanus x acerifolia 1

Kunratick˝ dubCommon oak in Kunratice

Kunratice 862 Z Quercus robur 1

LÌpa na VÌdeÚskÈSmall-leaved lime in VÌdeÚsk· Street

KrË 2998 Z Tilia cordata 1

Pavlovnie ve Vrchlick˝ch sadechRoyal Paulownia in VrchlickÈho sady

NovÈ MÏsto 2313/11 2531 Paulownia tomentosa 1

Tureck· lÌska na Pet¯ÌnÏTurkish hazel at Pet¯Ìn

HradËany 274 Z Corylus colurna 1

Platan na KampÏPlane tree in Kampa

Mal· Strana 778/1 1059 Platanus x acerifolia 1

LÌpa ve Vino¯iSmall-leaved lime in Vino¯

Vino¯ 309 Z Tilia cordata 1

Dub v KunraticÌch ÑU Vesteck˝chìCommon oak in Kunratice ìU Vesteck˝chî

Kunratice 2362/1 Z Quercus robur 1

LÌpa v P¯ednÌ KopaninÏSmall-leaved lime in P¯ednÌ Kopanina

P¯ednÌ Kopanina 725 Z Tilia cordata 1

LÌpa u br·ny z·meckÈho parkuSmall-leaved lime at the gateto the chateau park

Kunratice 11.I 2506/1, 2506/2 Tilia cordata 1

Jasan u kostela sv. PetraEuropean ash at the St. Peter Church

DubeË 2 Z Fraxinus excelsior 1

LÌpa Na Cik·nceSmall-leaved lime Na Cik·nce

RadotÌn 2911 2912/1, 2931,2913/1

Tilia cordata 1

Dub na n·vsi v HostavicÌchCommon oak at the village green in Hostavice

Hostavice 914 1009, 946 Quercus robur 1



N·zevName

Katastr·lnÌ ˙zemÌCadastral

district

ParcelaPlot

OchrannÈ p·smoProtection zone

DruhSpecies

ksNum-ber

Duby na jiûnÌm okraji KunratickÈho lesaCommon oaks at the South edgeof Kunratice Forest

Kunratice 862, 863/1 864/1,2342/1 Kunr.,2113/1,2112 Chod.

Quercus robur 3

LÌpy v SatalicÌchLarge leaved lime and small-leaved limein Satalice

Satalice 76 Z T. cordataa platyphylla

5

Duby v p·su u ÿÌËankyCommon oaks in the belt along ÿÌËanka

Uh¯inÏves 1756/1 1756/2 Quercus robur 6

Dub p¯i ul. St¯elniËn·Common oak in the St¯elniËn· Str.

Kobylisy 2364/1 Z Quercus robur 1

Dub u samoty NouzovCommon oak near the Nouzov settlement

ToËn· 845 844, 846, 847, 848 Quercus robur 1

HruöeÚ nad ZdÌkovskou ulicÌPear-tree at the ZdÌkovsk· Str.

SmÌchov 4221/1 Z Pyrus communis 1

Platan v parku JezerkaPlane tree in the Jezerka Park

Nusle 2387 Z Platanus x acerifolia 1

Dub v ovocnÈm sadÏ (ul. K Hork·m)Common oak in the orchard (K Hork·m Street)

Hostiva¯ 2241/1 Z Quercus robur 1

Dub v ul. U MalvazinkyCommon oak in the Street U Malvazinky

SmÌchov 1813/1 Z Quercus robur 1

Duby ve CtÏnickÈm h·jiCommon oaks in the CtÏnick˝ Grove

Vino¯ 704/1 Z Quercus robur 11

Duby v CholupickÈ baûantniciCommon oaks in the Cholupice Pheasantry

Cholupice 342 Z Quercus robur 2

LÌpa v KrËskÈ ul. 205/24lSmall-leaved lime in the Street KrËsk· 205/24l

KrË 1451 Z Tilia platyphylla 1

Dub v ÿ·snovceCommon oak in the Street ÿ·snovka

StarÈ MÏsto 1027 Z Quercus robur 1

LÌpa v ChabrechSmall-leaved lime in Chabry

T¯ebonice 339 Z Tilia cordata 1

Velk˝ dub na TrojskÈm ostrovÏA large common oak on the Trojsk˝ Island

BubeneË 1893/9 Z Quercus robur 1

Dub v Z·bÏhlicÌchCommon oak in Z·bÏhlice

Z·bÏhlice 22.I Ë·st parcel 22/1,20/3, 20/4, 21/2

Quercus robur 1

Platan v PodbabÏ 20/2523Plane tree at 20/2523 Podbaba

Dejvice 4838 Ë·st parcel 4837,4838, 4840, 4865

Platanus acerifolia 1

Dub v DolnÌch PoËernicÌchCommon oak in DolnÌ PoËernice

DolnÌ PoËernice 303 Ë·st parcel 295/1,303, 306

Quercus robur 1

Buky v obo¯e HvÏzdaEuropean beeches in the HvÏzda GamePreserve

Liboc 1244,1245

1245 Z, 1254+Ë·stparcel 1237+1238

Fagus silvatica 2

Dub u parku v B¯ezinÏvsiCommon oak near park in B¯ezinÏves

B¯ezinÏves 581 Z Quercus robur 1

Dub za n·mÏstÌm b¯Ì Jandus˘Common oak behind b¯Ì Jandus˘ Square

Uh¯ÌnÏves 169/1 169/1, 168, 2180 Quercus robur 1

Zdroj / Source: OéP MHMP



Tab. B3.3 P¯ehled registrovan˝ch v˝znamn˝ch krajinn˝ch prvk˘Overview of registered significant landscape elements

»ÌsloNum-ber

N·zevName

Katastr·lnÌ˙zemÌ

Cadastraldistrict

ParcelyPlots

DatumDay

1 »ert˘v vröek / Devilís Hill LibeÚ 1999, 2097/1, 2098/1, 2447/1 27. 9. 1999

2 Botanick· zahrada UKBotanical Garden of the Charles University

NovÈ MÏsto 1580, 1582, 1584, 1586, 1590, 1597/1 21. 4. 1999

3 St¯edisko sluûeb Hostiva¯Service Centre Hostiva¯

Hostiva¯ 1780/2 28. 9. 1999

4 K Vrtilce PÌsnice 55 21. 1. 2000

5 K¯Ìdov˝ v˝choz na vrch·ch v BÏchovicÌchCretaceous outcrop on hills in BÏchovice

BÏchovice 1402 26. 4. 2000

6 Zamok¯el· louka u Golfu v BÏchovicÌchWet meadow near Golf in BÏchovice

BÏchovice 1408 19. 4. 2000

7 RemÌzek u Stacha / Hedgerow at Stach BÏchovice 1442, 1443 19. 4. 2000

8 Step nad golfov˝m h¯iötÏm v JinonicÌchSteppe above the golf course in Jinonice

Jinonice 1353/2 (Ë·st), 1353/33 (Ë·st) 12. 4. 2000

9 Mok¯ady U PalouËkuWetlands near PalouËek

Stod˘lky 1177/34, 1177/46, 1177/47 14. 8. 2000

10 Topoly »ervenoml˝nskÈho potokaPoplar trees along »ervenoml˝nsk˝ Creek

Miökovice 324/1 (Ë·st), 327/1, 327/2, 327/3, 327/4,327/5, 327/6, 327/7 (Ë·st), 327/8, 329/1

17. 10. 2000

11 SkalnÌ ˙tvar u PodolskÈho profiluRock formation near Podol profilei

PodolÌ 1093/3 (Ë·st), 1093/2 (Ë·st), 1094/1 (Ë·st) 12. 4. 2000

12 SpoleËenstva k¯Ìdov˝ch pramen˘ Pod SpiritkouCommunities of cretaceous springs Pod Spiritkou

SmÌchov 4221/1 (Ë·st), 4672/1 (Ë·st) 23. 5. 2000

13 SpoleËenstva k¯Ìdov˝ch pramen˘ Pod CÌsa¯kouCommunities of cretaceous springs Pod CÌsa¯kou

SmÌchov 4672/1 (Ë·st) 8. 11. 2000

14 Mok¯ady Trinagl v Hostiva¯iWetlands Triangl in Hostiva¯

Hostiva¯ 1712 (Ë·st), 1717/1 (Ë·st), 1719/2 (Ë·st),1725 (Ë·st), 1744, 1745, 1746, 1747,1748, 1751/2, 1752/1, 1752/2, 1754,1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 2725/1 (Ë·st),4499 (Ë·st), 4501/1 (Ë·st)

20. 2. 2001

15 NivnÌ porosty V Dubin·chFloodplain growth V Dubin·ch

Kunratice 2361/1 (Ë·st), 2361/3, 2361/4, 2361/5,2361/6, 2361/12, 2361/15, 2361/16,2522/1 (Ë·st), 2522/4, (494), (495),(496), (497), (498/1), (498/2), (499),(542), (543), (576), (581), (582), (583),(589/1), (590/2), (591)

26. 3. 2001

16 ÿepsk· stepSteppe in ÿepy

ÿepy 1504/1 (Ë·st) 6. 8. 2001


Tab. B3.4 P¯ehled p¯ÌrodnÌch park˘ na ˙zemÌ mÏstaList of nature parks on the City territory

N·zev / Name Z¯izovacÌ p¯edpis / Established by

1. BotiË ñ MilÌËov vyhl. Ë. 3/1984 Sb. NVP / Decree of the NCP No. 3/1984 Code

2. ÿÌËanka vyhl. Ë. 3/1984 Sb. NVP / Decree of the NCP No. 3/1984 Code

3. RadotÌnsko ñ Chuchelsk˝ h·j vyhl. Ë. 8/1990 Sb. NVP / Decree of the NCP No. 8/1990 Code

4. ä·rka ñ Lysolaje vyhl. Ë. 8/1990 Sb. NVP / Decree of the NCP No. 8/1990 Code

5. Drah·Ú ñ Troja vyhl. Ë. 8/1990 Sb. NVP / Decree of the NCP No. 8/1990 Code

6. Hostiva¯ ñ Z·bÏhlice vyhl. Ë. 8/1990 Sb. NVP / Decree of the NCP No. 8/1990 Code

7. Rokytka vyhl. Ë. 8/1990 Sb. NVP / Decree of the NCP No. 8/1990 Code

8. Mod¯ansk· rokle ñ Cholupice vyhl. Ë. 3/1991 Sb. HMP / Decree of the NCP No. 3/1991 Code

9. KoöÌ¯e ñ Motol vyhl. Ë. 3/1991 Sb. HMP / Decree of the NCP No. 3/1991 Code

10. Kl·novice ñ »ihadla vyhl. Ë. 3/1991 Sb. HMP / Decree of the NCP No. 3/1991 Code

11. ProkopskÈ a DalejskÈ ˙dolÌ vyhl. Ë. 7/1993 Sb. HMP / Decree of the NCP No. 7/1993 Code




Tab. B3.5 P¯ehled zvl·ötÏ chr·nÏn˝ch ˙zemÌ mÏstaOverview of areas of special protection of the City

N·zevName

Kat.Cat.

Pozn.Note OP Z¯izovacÌ p¯edpis

Established by

1. Baba PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

2. BarrandovskÈ sk·ly NPP MéP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

3. Baûantnice v SatalicÌch PP Z v˝nos MK »SR Ë. 14.200/88-S⁄OP

4. BÌl· sk·la PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

5. BohnickÈ ˙dolÌ PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb.NVP

6. BranickÈ sk·ly PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

7. Cihelna v Baûantnici PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

8. Cik·nka I. NPP MéP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

9. Cik·nka II. PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

10. Ctirad PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

11. »imickÈ ˙dolÌ PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

12. Dalejsk˝ profil NPP MéP Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

13. Divok· ä·rka PR V vyhl. Ë. 12/1964 Sb. NVP

14. DolnÌ ä·rka PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

15. Havr·nka PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

16. Homolka PR Z vyhl. Ë. 1/1982 Sb. NVP

17. Housle PP Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

18. HrnËÌ¯skÈ louky PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

19. HvÌûÔalka PP CHKO Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

20. Cholupick· baûantnice PP V vyhl. Ë. 1/1982 Sb. NVP

21. Chuchelsk˝ h·j PR Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

22. Chvalsk˝ lom PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

23. JabloÚka PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

24. Jener·lka PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

25. Kalv·rie v Motole PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

26. Kl·novick˝ les ñ Cyrilov PR Z ñ Kl. l.V ñ Cy.

vyhl. Ë. 1/1982, 5/1988 Sb. NVP a vyhl·ökaONV Praha ñ v˝chod z 16. 2. 1990

27. Klapice PR CHKO Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

28. Kr·lovsk· obora PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

29. KrÚ·k PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

30. L·dvÌ PP Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

31. Letensk˝ profil PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

32. LÌtoûnice PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

33. Lochkovsk˝ profil NPP MéP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

34. Meandry BotiËe PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

35. MilÌËovsk˝ les a rybnÌky PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

36. Mod¯ansk· rokle PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

37. Motolsk˝ ordovik PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

38. M˝to PR Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

39. Nad Ml˝nem PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

40. Nad Z·vodiötÏm PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

41. Obora HvÏzda PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

42. Obora v Uh¯ÌnÏvsi PP V vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

43. OkrouhlÌk PP Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

44. Opat¯ilka ñ »erven˝ lom PP Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

45. Opukov˝ lom P¯ednÌ Kopanina PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

46. OrtocÈrov˝ l˘mek PP Z v˝nos MK »SR Ë. 9.861/76

47. Pecka PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

48. Pet¯ÌnskÈ skalky PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP (v. 23/91 MHMP)



N·zevName

Kat.Cat.

Pozn.Note OP Z¯izovacÌ p¯edpis

Established by

49. Pitkovick· str·Ú PP Z v˝nos MK »SR Ë. 13360/68-II/2

50. PoËernick˝ rybnÌk PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

51. PodbabskÈ sk·ly PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

52. Podho¯Ì PR V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

53. Podolsk˝ profil PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

54. Pod ökolou PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

55. Pod évahovem PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

56. Poû·ry NPP MéP Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

57. Praûsk˝ zlom PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

58. ProkopskÈ ˙dolÌ PR V v˝nos MK »SR Ë. 25.533/78

59. ProseckÈ sk·ly PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

60. RadotÌnskÈ sk·ly PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

61. RadotÌnskÈ ˙dolÌ PR CHKO Z v˝nos MK »SR Ë. 8.200/75

62. RohoûnÌk ñ lom v DubËi PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

63. Salabka PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

64. SedleckÈ sk·ly PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

65. Skalka PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

66. SlaviËÌ ˙dolÌ PR Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

67. StaÚkovka PR CHKO Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

68. St¯eöovickÈ sk·ly PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

69. äance PR Z vyhl. Ë. 1/1982 Sb. NVP

70. Trojsk· PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

71. U BranickÈho pivovaru PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

72. ⁄dolÌ KunratickÈho potoka PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

73. ⁄dolÌ ⁄nÏtickÈho potoka PR Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

74. U H·j˘ PP Z vyhl. Ë. 1/1982 Sb. NVP

75. U NovÈho ml˝na NPP MéP Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

76. U Z·visti PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

77. Velk· sk·la PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

78. V Hrobech PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

79. Vidoule PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

80. Vino¯sk˝ park PR Z vyhl. Ë. 3/1982 Sb. NVP

81. Vizerka PP V vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

82. V PÌskovnÏ PR V vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

83. Xaverovsk˝ H·j PP Z vyhl. Ë. 1/1982 Sb. NVP

84. Z·mky PP V vyhl. Ë. 4/1982 Sb. NVP

85. Zlatnice PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1968 Sb. NVP

86. ZmrzlÌk PP Ë·st CHKO V vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

87. éelezniËnÌ z·¯ez PP Z vyhl. Ë. 5/1988 Sb. NVP

Roztock˝ h·j ñ TichÈ ˙dolÌ PR Z v˝nos MK »SR Ë. 14.200/88-S⁄OPmimo hl. m. Prahy, zasahuje pouze Ë·st 50 m OP

Legenda / Key:

PP p¯ÌrodnÌ pam·tka / Nature MonumentPR p¯ÌrodnÌ rezervace / Nature ReserveNPP n·rodnÌ p¯ÌrodnÌ pam·tka / National Nature MonumentZ ochrannÈ p·smo ze z·kona, tj. 50 m / Protection zone pursuant to the Act, i.e. 50 m wideV ochrannÈ p·smo vyhl·öenÈ / Established protection zoneMZP Ministerstvo ûivotnÌho prost¯edÌ v »R / the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech RepublicCHKO Chr·nÏn· krajinn· oblast »esk˝ kras / Protected Landscape Area Bohemian Carst

Celkem je na ˙zemÌ HMP 87 ZCH⁄ / In total there are 87 areas of special protection of the City territory

Kategorie PP ñ 66 / Category NM ñ 66Kategorie PR ñ 15 / Category NR ñ 15Kategorie NPP ñ 6 / Category NNM ñ 6 Zdroj / Source: OéP MHMP



Èak

ovi

ce

Bøe

zin

ìves

Ïáb

lice

Do

lní

Ch

abry

Su

chd

ol

Pra

ha

8

Vin

oø

Let

òan

yP

øed

ní

Ko

pan

ina

Lys

ola

je

Kb

ely

Tro

ja

Pra

ha

6

Neb

uši

ce

Pra

ha

9

Sat

alic

e

Pra

ha

7

Ho

rní

Po

èern

ice

Pra

ha

14P

rah

a1

Pra

ha

3

Zli

èín

Øep

y

Do

lní

Po

èern

ice

Klá

no

vice

Pra

ha

2

Pra

ha

5P

rah

a10

Bìc

ho

vice

Pra

ha

13Ú

jezd

nad

Les

y

Štì

rbo

ho

ly

Du

beè

Pra

ha

4

Pra

ha

15K

olo

dìj

e

Øep

ory

je

Uh

øín

ìves

Sliv

enec

Pra

ha

11

Vel

káC

hu

chle

Krá

lovi

ce

Pet

rovi

ce

Ku

nra

tice

Pra

ha

12

Køe

slic

e

Rad

otí

n

Lo

chko

v

Šeb

ero

vL

ibu

šB

enic

e

Zb

rasl

av

Ned

vìzí

Ko

lovr

aty

Lip

ence

KL

ÁN

OV

ICE

-È

IHA

DL

A

BO

TIÈ

MIL

ÍÈO

VR

AD

OT

ÍNS

KO

-C

HU

CH

EL

SK

ÝH

ÁJ

PR

OK

OP

SK

ÉA

DA

LE

JSK

ÉÚ

DO

LÍ

HO

ST

IVA

Ø-

ZÁ

BÌ

HL

ICE

ØÍÈ

AN

KA

RO

KY

TK

A

ŠÁ

RK

A-

LYS

OL

AJE

DR

AH

ÁÒ

-T

RO

JA

MO

DØ

AN

SK

ÁR

OK

LE

-C

HO

LU

PIC

E

KO

ŠÍÀ

E-

MO

TO

L

34

7

10

11

19

23

26

27

30

34

37

39

45

46

47

49

52

5364

68

69

70

71

75

78

80

84

86

88

85

82

5 55

79

15

22

62

59

43

35

51

40

57

61

73 56

21

13

83

41

25

81

44

722

1

18

50

32

33

67

20

76

2824

17

9

65

54

14

31

87

8

16

48

43

29

58

12 6036

6

77

38

66

74

Ob

r.B

3.4

Ch

rán

ìná

úze

mí,

jejic

ho

chra

nn

áp

ásm

aa

pøí

rod

níp

arky

,200

0P

rote

cte

da

rea

s,

the

irp

rote

cti

on

zo

ne

s,

an

dn

atu

rep

ark

s,

20

00

Zdro

j/M

HM

P,Ú

RM

Sourc

e:

140



význ

am

ný

krajin

ný

prv

ek

sig

nific

antla

ndscape

com

ponent

chrá

nìná

úze

mí

pro

tecte

dare

as

och

ranná

pásm

a-

def.

pásm

em

50

mpro

tection

zones

-esta

blis

hed

as

50

mw

ide

zone

och

ranná

pásm

a-

def.

parc

ela

miz

vyhlá

šek

pro

tection

zones

-esta

blis

hed

as

plo

tslis

ted

indecre

es

pøí

rodnípark

ynatu

ralpark

s

pam

átn

ýst

rom

-vy

hlá

šený

/m

em

ora

ble

tree

-esta

blis

hed

pam

átn

ýst

rom

-pøipra

vova

ný

kvy

hlá

šení/m

em

ora

ble

tree

-pre

pare

dfo

resta

blis

hm

ent


¡

B3.3 MÃSTSK¡ ZELE“ ñ PARKYA ZAHRADY

Pro mÏsto je zpracov·n SystÈm pÈËe o zeleÚv hl. m. Praze, kter˝ rozdÏlil parky a parkovÏ upra-venÈ plochy do Ëty¯ kategoriÌ podle v˝znamu, kter˝v systÈmu zaujÌmajÌ. Spr·vcem park˘ I. katego-rie je mÏsto zastoupenÈ odborem mÏstskÈ zelenÏMHMP, spr·vci ostatnÌch ploch jsou p¯ÌsluönÈmÏstskÈ Ë·sti.

Parky I. kategorie v majetku a spr·vÏ mÏsta:

Kr·lovsk· obora (89,6 ha) ñ Tato pam·tka zahradnÌarchitektury je v˝znamn· sv˝m rekreaËnÌm po-tenci·lem, ale tvo¯Ì i dominantnÌ souË·st zelenÏmÏsta. V roce 1997 byla zpracov·na studie po-stupnÈ obnovy. Odbor mÏstskÈ zelenÏ, jako in-vestor, postupnÏ zad·v· zpracov·nÌ podrobnÏj-öÌch dokumentacÌ. V souËasnÈ dobÏ je ke ökodÏ,vzhledem k odporu a nepochopenÌ ortodoxnÌchochr·nc˘ p¯Ìrody, odkl·d·na z·chrana a rozvojporost˘ a skupin strom˘.

Rudolfova ötola ñ Rekonstrukce probÌhala v letech1988ñ1994. ätolou je p¯iv·dÏna voda z Vltavy dorybnÌk˘ v Kr·lovskÈ obo¯e. Po dokonËenÌ pracÌ natÏlese ötoly byly zah·jeny pr·ce na vyËiötÏnÌ ryb-nÌk˘. ätola zcela jednoznaËnÏ a z·sadnÌm zp˘so-bem ovlivÚuje ekosystÈm obory. Pr·ce provedenÈna ötole si vyû·daly finanËnÌ Ë·stku cca 8 mil. KË,pr·ce na vyËiötÏnÌ rybnÌk˘ a souvisejÌcÌ pr·ce sivyû·daly Ë·stku 1,5 mil. KË.

LetenskÈ sady (52,1 ha) ñ Pat¯Ì k nejv˝znamnÏj-öÌm mÏstsk˝m ploch·m v systÈmu zelenÏ. Jsou spo-jovacÌm Ël·nkem mezi Chotkov˝mi sady a Kr·lov-skou oborou. VyuûÌv·ny jsou pro rekreaËnÌ ˙Ëely,spoleËenskÈ ˙Ëely a p¯edevöÌm k promen·dnÌm pro-ch·zk·m.V roce 1998 byl zpracov·n prov·dÏcÌ pro-jekt obnovy I. etapa, kter· byla zrealizov·na v le-tech 1998ñ1999. ZÌsk·nÌ ˙zemnÌho rozhodnutÌ pro

B3.3 CITY GREENERY ñ PARKSAND GARDENS

There is the System of Care for Greenery in the Cityof Prague worked out, which classified parks andpark-like areas into four categories on the basis ofimportance of their respective position they occupyin the System. Parks of Category I are administeredby the City, represented for the purpose by the De-partment of the City Greenery of MHMP, other areasare administered by the appropriate City District.

Parks category I possessed and administered bythe City:

Royal Game Preserve (89.6 ha) ñ This monument ofgarden architecture is important for its recreationalpotential yet also because it forms a dominant partof the City greenery. In 1997 there was a study ongradual renewal of the Game Preserve developed.The Department of the City Greenery as the investorthereof, has been ordering step by step more detaileddocumentation sets. It is a pity, that for the sake ofthe resistance and misunderstanding of the orthodoxenvironmentalists the salvation and developmentof stands and tree groups have been postponed atpresent.

Cesar Rudolph Water Tunnel ñ The Tunnel recon-struction was implemented in 1988ñ1994. The Tunneltakes water from the Vltava River to the lakes in theRoyal Game Preserve. Once the works on the Tunnelbody were completed further works on cleaning ofthe lakes were launched. The Tunnel has clear andfundamental influence on the Game Preserve eco-system. The works done to the Tunnel demanded theamount of approx. CZK 8 million, the lakes cleaningand related works accounted for CZK 1.5 million.

LetenskÈ Orchards (52.1 ha) ñ They belong to themost important City areas in the system of greenery.They form the interlink in between the ChotkovyOrchards and the Royal Game Preserve. They areutilised for recreational purposes, social purposes,and first of all to promenade walks. In 1998 an exe-cutive design for the renewal of phase I was deve-



Tab. B3.6 V˝mÏra park˘ podle kategoriÌ SystÈmu pÈËe o zeleÚ v hl. m. PrazePark areas by category in the System of Care for Greenery of the City of Prague

KategorieCategory

PopisDescription

V˝mÏra [ha]Area

I plochy mimo¯·dnÈ d˘leûitosti, kterÈ sv˝m v˝znamem p¯esahujÌ r·mec mÏstaareas of extraordinary importance, which due to their significance go beyond the City boundary

221,1

II plochy celomÏstskÈho v˝znamu / areas significant to the entire City 70,2

III plochy mÏstskÈho v˝znamu / areas significant to the City 149,0

IV plochy doplÚkovÈ, parkovÏ upravenÈ / additional areas, park-like treated 2 122,1

Celkem / Total 2 555,7

Zdroj / Source: MHMP

II. a III. etapu trvalo dva roky z d˘vod˘ napad·nÌprojektu r˘zn˝mi obËansk˝mi sdruûenÌmi. V roce1999 bylo zad·no z d˘vod˘ nalÈhavÈ pot¯eby vy-pracov·nÌ projektu z·vlahovÈho vodovodu. V sou-ËasnÈ dobÏ se dokonËuje obnova dÏtskÈho h¯iötÏ.

Komplex zahrad Pet¯Ìna (49 ha) ñ V roce 2000,byla zah·jena dlouho p¯ipravovan· rekonstrukce n·-stupnÌch prostor˘ komplexu zahrad vrchu Pet¯Ìna.

Zahrada NebozÌzek ñ VlastnÌ stavebnÌ a zahrad-nickÈ pr·ce zapoËaly na ja¯e roku 2000, v roce 2001byla dokonËena socha¯sk· v˝zdoba, ˙prava tzv.ji¯inkovÈho sadu a obnova dÏtskÈho h¯iötÏ.

Semin·¯sk· zahrada ñ Od roku 1980 do roku 2000probÌhala pl·novan· dvacetilet· obnova ovocnÈhosadu. Pokud by se s obnovou nezapoËalo (k·cenÌstar˝ch a vysazov·nÌ mlad˝ch strom˘), sad by p¯e-stal plnit svou funkci a nejr·zovitÏjöÌ Ë·st Pet¯Ìna,viditeln· z velkÈ Ë·sti mÏsta, by byla v souËasnÈdobÏ jiû hol·.

Hladov· zeÔ ñ V souvislosti s rozlohou zdi bylaoprava rozvrûena do nÏkolika etap. Doba rekon-strukËnÌch pracÌ je p¯Ìmo ˙mÏrn· mnoûstvÌ fi-nanËnÌch prost¯edk˘, kterÈ m˘ûe mÏsto v jednotli-v˝ch letech na obnovu zdi vÏnovat. Pokud se po-da¯Ì zajistit dostateËnÈ finanËnÌ prost¯edky, lze p¯ed-pokl·dat dokonËenÌ opravy ke konci roku 2003.

loped and then implemented in 1998ñ1999. To obtainland-use decision for phases II and III took two yearsdue to attacks to the design by various civil associa-tions. In 1999 a design of irrigation water mainswas ordered for the sake of urgency. At present therenewal of children playground is being finished.

Premises of gardens across the Pet¯Ìn Hill (49 ha) ñIn 2000 the long-time prepared reconstruction ofentrance areas to the premises of gardens acrossthe Pet¯Ìn Hill began.

NebozÌzek Garden ñ Gardening and constructionworks were launched as early as in spring 2000, in2001 the sculptural beautifying objects were finished,the so called Dahlia Orchard was completed, andthe children playground was refurbished.

Convent Garden ñ Since 1980 till 2000 the slatedtwenty-year renewal of the fruit orchard was done.If the renewal would have not been started (fellingof old trees and planting of young ones), the orchardwould cease to fulfil its functionality and the mostpicturesque part of the Pet¯Ìn Hill, visible from a vastportion of the City would be bare now.

Hungry Wall ñ Owing to the Wall size its repair wasplanned into several phases. The time spent for recon-struction works is proportional to the amount of fi-nances, which the City may allocate to the Wall renewalin respective years. If it is managed that finances largeenough are allocated then the completion of thereconstruction may be expected by the end of 2003.



Tab. B3.7 P¯ehled finanËnÌch n·klad˘ na obnovu v KËOverview of financial costs of the renewal in CZK

STROMOVKA / ROYAL GAME PRESERVE 1998 1999 2000

LaviËky, koöe / Benches, litter baskets 373 570,ñ 103 845,ñ 126 705,ñ

⁄drûba / Maintenance 3 316 542,ñ 7 545 678,ñ 15 300 486,ñ

Investice / Investments 450 000,ñ 345 650,ñ 2 609 950,ñ

Celkem z rozpoËtu OéP / Total from the OéP budget chapter 4 140 112,ñ 7 995 173,ñ 18 037 141,ñ

P¯idÏleno do rozp. M» P 7Allocated to the budget of the City District Prague 7

10 164 000,ñ 7 542 939,ñ ñ

Celkem z rozpoËtu MHMP / Total from the City budget 14 304 112,ñ 15 538 112,ñ 18 037 141,ñ



LETN¡ / LETN¡ PLAIN 1998 1999 2000


⁄drûba / Maintenance 642 690,ñ 4 127 207,ñ 6 735 235,ñ

Investice / Investments 289 000,ñ 352 767,ñ 79 095,ñ



6 402 000,ñ 3 576 061,ñ ñ



Vrch VÌtkov (29,5 ha) ñ Pat¯Ì mezi v˝znamnÈmÏstskÈ parky a Ë·st je dokonce vyhl·öena jakon·rodnÌ kulturnÌ pam·tka. Odbor mÏstskÈ zelenÏse i zde snaûÌ realizovat z·vlahov˝ systÈm. Bylyprovedeny nÏkterÈ pÏstebnÌ z·sahy a Ë·steËnÏ pro-bÌh· postupnÈ vysazov·nÌ nov˝ch strom˘.

Zahrada Kinsk˝ch ñ S budovou letohr·dku pat¯Ìmezi evropsk· p¯ÌrodnÌ krajin·¯sk· dÌla. V roce 1999se poda¯ilo projednat dalöÌ stupeÚ dokumentacek ˙zemnÌmu ¯ÌzenÌ, kde jsou rozpracov·ny hlavnÌz·sady obnovy. V tÈto lokalitÏ se v minulÈm rocerovnÏû poda¯ilo otev¯Ìt novÈ dÏtskÈ h¯iötÏ. Velk˝v˝znam i pro sousednÌ zahrady (zavlaûov·nÌ) m·obnova a vybudov·nÌ nov˝ch ötol pro podzemnÌ vody,kterÈ p˘vodnÏ odtÈkaly bez uûitku do kanalizace.

VÌtkov Mountain (29.5 ha) ñ The mountain belongsto the important City parks and a part thereof wasestablished as the National Culture Monument. TheDepartment of the City Greenery strives to imple-ment an irrigation system there. There were certaingardening measures taken and in part planting ofnew trees has been ongoing.

Kinsk˝ch Garden ñ It belongs, along with itssummerhouse building, to the European nature andlandscape monuments. In 1999 further level of docu-mentation for the land-use planing process werenegotiated. Last year a new children playgroundwas commissioned in this locality. The renewal ofold water tunnels and building of new ones forgroundwater, which were originally drained into thedrainage system with no use, shall be very importantto neighbouring gardens.




PETÿÕN / PETÿÕN HILL 1998 1999 2000



Hladov· zeÔ / Hungry Wall 4 682 609,ñ 7 631 400,ñ 10 656 514,ñ

Investice / Investments 402 000,ñ 4 054 500,ñ 14 437 693,ñ

Celkem z rozpoËtu OéP / Total from the OéP budget chapter 7 450 820,ñ 14 851 685,ñ ñ


4 318 000,ñ 4 780 000,ñ 4 800 000,ñ




VÕTKOV / VÕTKOV MOUNTAIN 1998 1999 2000

Koöe / Litter baskets 161 518,ñ ñ ñ

⁄drûba / Maintenance 4 341 791,80 3 537 458,20 2 430 200,80

Investice / Investments ñ ñ ñ

Celkem z rozpoËtu OéP / Total from the OéP budget chapter 4 503 309,80 3 537 458,20 2 430 200,80

P¯idÏleno do rozp. M» 3Allocated to the budget of the City District Prague 3

ñ ñ ñ

Celkem z rozpoËtu MHMP / Total from the City budget 4 503 309,80 3 537 458,20 2 430 200,80



ZAHRADA KINSK›CH / KINSK›CH GARDEN 1998 1999 2000

LaviËky, koöe / Bench, litter baskets ñ 510 748,ñ ñ


Investice / Investments 1 379 600,ñ 5 425 658,ñ 14 035 107,ñ


P¯idÏleno do rozp. M» 1Allocated to the budget of the City District Prague 1

ñ ñ ñ



Praûsk· stromo¯adÌ ñ Na poË·tku roku 1995 byldokonËen projekt VyhodnocenÌ stavu a n·vrhpÏstebnÌch opat¯enÌ pro vybran· uliËnÌ stromo¯adÌv Praze. Byly zpracov·ny informace o uliËnÌchstromo¯adÌch v cca jednÈ t¯etinÏ mÏsta (ölo o 28 ka-tastr·lnÌch ˙zemÌ sousedÌcÌch s Vltavou). Bylo hod-noceno 8638 ks strom˘ tvo¯ÌcÌch 296 stromo¯adÌ.Stromo¯adÌ byla posuzov·na z hlediska jejich˙plnosti a dalöÌ perspektivy. Projekt vych·zel zezjiötÏnÈho zdravotnÌho a pÏstebnÌho stavu dan˝chstromo¯adÌ (u jednotliv˝ch strom˘ byl zjiöùov·nfyziologick˝ vÏk, zdravotnÌ stav a vitalita, u stromo-¯adÌ jeho ˙plnost a perspektiva). P¯i celkovÈm shr-nutÌ vyhodnocenÌ uliËnÌch stromo¯adÌ v roce 1995bylo zjiötÏno, ûe jedna t¯etina stromo¯adÌ splÚujez·porn· kritÈria hodnocenÌ. Do souËasnÈ doby bylov praûsk˝ch ulicÌch vysazeno okolo 1500 nov˝chstrom˘. Pro v˝sadbu jsou vybÌr·ny druhy co nej-odolnÏjöÌ v˘Ëi mnoha negativnÌm faktor˘m, nap¯.zasolenÌ p˘dy, p¯ÌmÈho kontaktu se solÌ, emisÌmz automobil˘, imisnÌmu prost¯edÌ, zastÌnÏnÌ okol-nÌch budov, zhutÚov·nÌ okolnÌho terÈnu, p¯eh¯Ì-v·nÌ, suchu atd. Stromo¯adÌ jsou v souladu seSystÈmem zelenÏ mÏsta rozdÏlena do dvou kate-goriÌ. Z·mÏrem je, aby mÏsto peËovalo o stromo-¯adÌ s tzv. celomÏstsk˝m v˝znamem a mÏstskÈ Ë·stio stromo¯adÌ zb˝vajÌcÌ.

Botanick· zahrada ñ Byla z¯Ìzena k 1. 1. 1969a p˘vodnÌ megalomansk˝ pl·n poËÌtal s plochoup¯esahujÌcÌ 130 ha. P¯ed rokem 1990 se udÏlalo jenm·lo uûiteËnÈho, a toto obdobÌ lze nazvat obdobÌmnaprostÈ stagnace. Od 22. 9. 1992 je Praûsk· bo-tanick· zahrada (PBZ) p¯ÌspÏvkovou organizacÌhl. m. Prahy. Expozice v budoucnu by mÏla pokr˝t18 ha, zbytek budou tvo¯it volnÏ p¯ÌstupnÈ rekreaËnÌplochy, chr·nÏn· ˙zemÌ, dÏtsk· h¯iötÏ, atd. PBZdnes pÏstuje p¯es 20 000 druh˘ vyööÌch rostlin,ËÌmû se dost·v· na druhÈ mÌsto v EvropÏ. SbÌrkyjsou jiû dnes vysoce cenÏny zahraniËnÌmi odbor-nÌky a v r·mci »R je PBZ obecnÏ pokl·d·na zanejdynamiËtÏji se rozvÌjejÌcÌ botanickou zahradu.

Boj s klÌnÏnkou jÌrovcovou v roce 2001 ñ MÏstojiû t¯etÌm rokem finanËnÏ a organizaËnÏ podpo-ruje vyhrab·v·nÌ listÌ pod stromy. BÏhem zimy,ve spolupr·ci s mÏstsk˝mi Ë·stmi (M»), byly vy-tipov·ny stromy vhodnÈ k chemickÈmu oöet¯enÌ.Oöet¯eno post¯ikem bylo 407 strom˘ vybran˝chM» a 894 strom˘ na exponovan˝ch lokalit·chv parcÌch I. kategorie. CelkovÈ n·klady na jed-nor·zovÈ oöet¯enÌ mlûenÌm byly 398 260,ñ KË.BÏhem mÏsÌce dubna byly na nÏkolika mÌstechv parcÌch I. kategorie rozmÌstÏny feromontovÈlapaËe, dÌky kter˝m bylo moûnÈ zachytit prvnÌ

Prague alleys ñ At the beginning of 1995 the ProjectAssessment of State and Proposals for SilvicultureMeasurers for Selected Street Alleys in Prague wascompleted. There was information on street alleys inapprox. one-third of the City (28 cadastral districtsadjoining to the Vltava River) processed. The assess-ment covered 8,638 tree specimens forming 296 alleys.The alleys were evaluated in terms of their comple-teness and further prospects. The Project was basedon the health and silviculture status found of thealleys (individual tree specimen was determined inits physiological age, health and vitality, for an alleyits completeness and prospects were determined).It was found making the summary of evaluations ofthe street alleys in 1995 that one third of the streetalleys does not have positive evaluation in these cri-teria. Till today there were around 1,500 new treesplanted in the Prague streets. To be planted suchspecies featuring the highest resistance to adversefactors as for example salinity of soil, direct contactto salts, automotive emissions, ground-level con-centrations of pollutants, shade from surroundingbuildings, compaction of surrounding ground, over-heating, drought, etc. are selected. The alleys aresubdivided into two categories according to theSystem of City Greenery. The objective is that theCity should take care of these alleys which boastimportance to whole City and City districts shouldtake care of the rest.

Botanical Garden ñ Was established on January 1,1969 and the original megalomaniac plans countedto have it on the area over 130 hectares. Before 1990just a little of good thing were done and the periodmay be characterised as the period of completestagnation. Since September 22, 1992 the PragueBotanical Garden (PBZ) has been a subsidised orga-nisation of the City of Prague. In future expositionsshould cover 18 hectares, the rest shall be dedicatedto recreational areas of free access, protected areas,children playgrounds, etc. Today the PBZ growsover 20,000 higher plant species, which means itis the second largest in Europe. The garden collec-tions are already now highly appreciated by foreignexperts and within the Czech Republic the PBZ is ingenerally taken as the most dynamically developingbotanical garden.

The combat against horse-chestnut leafmine[Cameraria ohridella] in 2001 ñ Already for threeyears the City has been providing supporting finan-cial and organisational back-up to the raking offleaves from under trees. In winter and in co-opera-tion with the City Districts trees suitable for chemicaltreatment were identified. 417 trees selected by CityDistricts and 894 trees at heavily exposed localitiesin parks category I were sprayed. Total costs for one-time treatment by mist were CZK 398,260. DuringApril pheromone traps were distributed over several



v˝skyt klÌnÏnky. LetoönÌ chladnÈ jaro a vËasn˝post¯ik omezily jejÌ v˝skyt a lze p¯edpokl·dat,ûe letoönÌ v˝skyt klÌnÏnky bude menöÌ neû v p¯e-deöl˝ch letech. Tak jako v boji s bolöevnÌkemvelkolep˝m i zde platÌ ñ nejd˘leûitÏjöÌ je soustav-nost a vytrvalost.

B3.4 LESY

Lesy na ˙zemÌ mÏsta tvo¯Ì zhruba 9 % z celkovÈv˝mÏry, tj. cca 4890 ha. Jsou za¯azeny do kate-gorie les˘ zvl·ötnÌho urËenÌ, tj. p¯ÌmÏstskÈ a dalöÌlesy se zv˝öenou rekreaËnÌ funkcÌ.

N·vötÏvnost jednotliv˝ch lesnÌch celk˘ je p¯Ìmoz·visl· na vzd·lenosti od obytn˝ch sÌdel, p¯ÌpadnÏMHD, zejmÈna metra. D˘leûit˝m faktorem, kter˝ovlivÚuje n·vötÏvnost, je i stav lesnÌch porost˘(st·¯Ì, d¯evinn· skladba, zdravotnÌ stav, prostup-nost apod.) a takÈ vybavenÌ rekreaËnÌmi prvky.

Z hlediska n·vötÏvnosti pat¯Ì mezi nejzatÌûenÏjöÌzejmÈna lesopark Hostiva¯, kter˝ splÚuje praktickyvöechny poûadavky na rekreaËnÌ les. DalöÌmi velminavötÏvovan˝mi lesy jsou Kunratick˝ a Michelsk˝les, œ·blick˝ h·j, obora HvÏzda a Divok· ä·rka.Dlouhodob˝m cÌlem je zatraktivnit i mÈnÏ navötÏ-vovanÈ lesnÌ celky tak, aby se rekreaËnÌ zatÌûenÌpraûsk˝ch les˘ rozloûilo rovnomÏrnÏji.

V lesÌch ve vlastnictvÌ hl. m. Prahy pokraËujezapoËat˝ trend v hospoda¯enÌ, tj. p¯emÏna smrko-v˝ch a borov˝ch monokultur ve öpatnÈm zdravot-nÌm stavu na porosty smÌöenÈ s d¯evinnou sklad-bou blÌûÌcÌ se p˘vodnÌmu p¯irozenÈmu sloûenÌporost˘ v oblasti Prahy (dub, habr, lÌpa, buk, p¯Ì-padnÏ borovice). V poslednÌ dobÏ je tÈû zv˝öen·snaha ve vÏtöÌ mÌ¯e vysazovat habr, kter˝ se jevÌjako velmi vit·lnÌ, bez v˝raznÏjöÌho ohroûenÌ hmy-zÌmi ök˘dci. Vysazov·nÌ introdukovan˝ch d¯evinjako je dub Ëerven˝ a jedle obrovsk· je velmi ome-zeno jen na vybranÈ lokality, kde nenÌ siln˝ z·-jem ochrany p¯Ìrody na v˝sadbÏ dom·cÌch druh˘d¯evin. Jedn· se zejmÈna o lokality mimo zvl·ötÏchr·nÏn· ˙zemÌ, biokoridory a biocentra.

sites in parks category I, which enabled to capturethe first occurrence of horse-chestnut leafmine. Thisyear could spring and timely spraying limited thehorse-chestnut leafmine occurrences and it may beexpected that this year the horse-chestnut leafminepopulation is smaller then in the past years. Here thesame holds as for the combat against cow parsnip[Heracleum sphon.] ñ the most important thing isto be systematic and patient.

B3.4 FORESTS

Forests account to roughly 9 % of total area of theCity territory, i.e. approx. 4,890 ha. They are inthe category of special purpose forests i.e. cityforests and other forests with pronounced recrea-tional function.

Number of visitors to particular forest massifs pro-portionally depends on their distance from residen-tial areas or service points of City Public Transport,namely the underground. The important factoraffecting the number of visitors is also the state offorest stand (age, tree species composition, health,available paths and forest roads, etc.) and also thelevel of equipment for recreation.

From the number of visitors point of view mostlythe Forest Park Hostiva¯, which meets virtuallyall requirements for a recreational forest, belongsamong the most loaded ones. Other very frequentlyvisited forests are Kunratick˝ Forest, Michelsk˝Forest, Game Park HvÏzda, and Divok· ä·rka.The long-term objective is to make less visited forestmassifs more attractive in order to distribute therecreational load of the Pragueís forests in a moreuniform manner.

Forests owned by the City of Prague have been keptunder the already started tendency in managementie. transformation of spruce and pine monoculturestands, which health shape is bad, into mixed growthswith species composition near to the autochthonousnatural growth composition in Prague area (oak,hornbeam, lime, beech, or pine). Recently efforts toplant hornbeams, which seem to be very vital andfree of more significant threat from insect pests,have been increased. Planting of introduced treespecies, as red oak and giant fir, has been verylimited to merely selected localities where there isno strongly pronounced concern of nature conser-vation in the planting of domestic tree species. Theseare namely localities outside the areas of specialprotection, biocorridors, and biocentres.



B3.5 BIOMONITORING éIVOTNÕHOPROSTÿEDÕ

B3.5.1 Sledov·nÌ v˝skytu lymskÈboreliÛzy a meningoencefalitidyv klÌötatech

V roce 1999 pokraËovalo monitorov·nÌ aktu·lnÌpromo¯enosti p˘vodcem n·kazy lymskÈ boreliÛzya klÌöùovÈ meningoencefalitidy ve sledovan˝ch lo-kalit·ch na ˙zemÌ hlavnÌho mÏsta Prahy. Monito-rov·nÌ bylo cÌlenÏ zamÏ¯eno na sledov·nÌ aktivityp¯ÌrodnÌch ohnisek n·kazy v podmÌnk·ch velko-mÏsta.

B3.5 BIOMONITORINGOF THE ENVIRONMENT

B3.5.1 Monitoring of Lyme borreliosisand meningoencephalitis agentsin ticks

In 1999 the monitoring of up-to-date percentageof infected ticks by the aetiological agents of Lymeborreliosis and meningoencephalitis in the areasof the monitored Pragueís greenery continued. Themonitoring was purposeful aimed at the monitoringof activity of natural infection focuses under largecity conditions.



Tab. B3.12 Kategorizace les˘ [tis. ha]Categories of forests [thousands ha]

Kategorizace les˘ / Forest category 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000Hospod·¯skÈ / Economic ñ ñ ñ ñ ñOchrannÈ / Protective ñ ñ ñ ñ ñZvl·ötnÌho urËenÌ / Special purpose 4,8 4,9 4,9 4,9 4,9

Zdroj / Source: ⁄H⁄L

Tab. B3.13 P¯ehled v˝voje imisnÌho poökozenÌ lesnÌch porost˘Overview of the development in immission damage of forest copses

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

LesnÌ porosty celkem / Forest copses total [tis. ha] / [103 hectares] 4,9 4,9 4,9 4,9 4,9

Porosty zdravÈ1) / Healthy copses1) [tis. ha] / [103 hectares] ñ ñ ñ ñ ñ

Porosty poökozenÈ2) / Damaged copses2) [tis. ha] / [103 hectares] 4,8 4,9 4,9 4,9 4,9ñ z toho: stupeÚ poökozenÌ IV.a a IV.bñ out of that degree of damage IV.a and IV.b

[tis. ha] / [103 hectares] ñ ñ ñ ñ ñ

PodÌl poökozenÌ z celkovÈ plochyPercentage of damaged copses of total forest area

[%] 100 100 100 100 100

1) StupeÚ poökozenÌ Ñû·dnÈì / Damage degree ìnoneî2) StupeÚ poökozenÌ 0/I aû IV.b / Damage degree from 0/I to IV.b Zdroj / Source: MZe

Tab. B3.14 Druhov· skladba vyj·d¯en· v procentech plochy lesnÌch porost˘Species composition expressed in percentage of forest copses area

Druh d¯eviny % Wood speciesJehliËnatÈ celkem 37,83 Total coniferous species

ñ smrk 11,81 ñ spruceñ borovice 20,68 ñ pineñ mod¯Ìn 5,18 ñ larchñ jedle, douglaska 0,16 ñ fir, Douglas firñ ostatnÌ jehliËnatÈ 0,00 ñ other coniferous species

ListnatÈ celkem 62,17 Total broadleaved speciesñ dub, habr 36,25 ñ oak, hornbeamñ buk 0,79 ñ beechñ jasan 2,98 ñ ashñ javor, lÌpa, jilm 6,98 ñ maple, lime, elmñ b¯Ìza 4,98 ñ birchñ ostatnÌ listnatÈ 10,19 ñ other broadleaved species

D¯eviny celkem 100,00 Total wood species


SbÏr klÌöùat byl prov·dÏn vlajkov·nÌm ve vybra-n˝ch lokalit·ch pracovnÌky odboru epidemiologieHygienickÈ stanice hl. m. Prahy ve spolupr·ci s pra-covnÌky MÏstskÈ hygienickÈ stanice poboËky proPrahu 4. Vyöet¯enÌ byla prov·dÏna ReferenËnÌlaborato¯Ì pro lymskou boreliÛzu SZ⁄ Praha me-todou imunofluorescence a ReferenËnÌ laborato¯Ìpro arboviry KrajskÈ hygienickÈ stanice Ostrava.

Podle v˝sledk˘ promo¯enosti lymskou boreliÛzoulze pozorovat oproti roku 1999 opÏtmÌrn˝ vzestup.NejvyööÌ procento promo¯enosti z testovan˝chlokalit je v KrËskÈm lese v pr˘mÏru 13,2 %, p¯i-Ëemû pozitivita samic je 14,2 %. Obdobn· situaceje v lokalitÏ Divok· ä·rka. Pr˘mÏrn· hodnota po-zitivity se zde pohybuje na hranici 11,1 %, p¯iËemûv nymf·ch je pozitivita 18,7 %.

PrvnÌ v˝sledky vyöet¯enÌ na klÌöùovou meningo-encefalitidu bÏûn˝mi metodami byly negativnÌ,v prosinci 2000 byl potvrzen pozitivnÌ v˝sledekz opakovanÈ reizolace u nymf z lokality KrËsk˝ les.

The ticks specimen collecting was performed byflagging at selected localities by workers of theDepartment of Epidemiology of the Public HeathAuthority of the City of Prague in the co-operationwith personnel of the Municipal Public HealthAuthority, branch for Prague 4. Testing was carriedout by the Reference Laboratory for Lyme borreliosisof SZ⁄, Prague applying the immunofluorescencemethod, and the Reference Laboratory for Arbo-viruses of the Regional Public Health Authority inOstrava.

According to the results on the percentage of ticksinfected with Lyme borreliosis a slight increase maybe seen again if compared to the results obtained in1999. the highest percentage of infection frequencyout of the localities tested is the KrËsk˝ Foreston average 13.2 %, while positive females accountfor 14.2 %. A similar situation is at the locality ofDivok· ä·rka. Average value of positive findingsthere is at the brink of 11.1 %, when nymphs featuredpositive findings in 18.7 % cases.

Results of the first of examinations for tick trans-mitted meningoencephalitis by common methodswere negative and in December 200 a positive resultwas confirmed form a re-isolation at nymphs forthe locality of KrËsk˝ Forest.



Tab. B3.15 V˝sledky vyöet¯enÌ klÌöùat Ixodes ricinus na p¯Ìtomnost kmenu Borelia sp., 2000Results of examination of ticks Ixodes ricinus for the presence of bacilli Borrelia sp., 2000

LokalitaLocality

Typ lokalityType of locality

Datum odbÏruSampling day

PoËet klÌöùat / Number of ticksnymfynymphs

samcimales

samicefemales

Praha 8 ñ povodÌ Vltavyu Bulovky

12. 5. 200016. 5. 200017. 5. 2000

11 35 25

Promo¯enost 9,1 % 8,6 % 8,0%Praha 4 ñ KrËsk˝ les LP 8. 6. 2000 cca 60 cca 60 cca 60Promo¯enost 13,7 % 11,1 % 14,2 %Praha 6 ñ Divok· ä·rka LP 14. 6. 2000 8 10 15Promo¯enost 18,7 % 5,5 % 10,0 %Praha 7 ñ Troja LP 21. 6. 2000 3 + (48)* (14)* (26)*Promo¯enost 3,9% neg. 3,8 %

L = les / forest, LP = lesopark / forest park Zdroj / Source: SZ⁄

Tab. B3.16 V˝sledky vyöet¯enÌ klÌöùat Ixodes ricinus na p¯Ìtomnost viru klÌöùovÈmeningoencefalitidy, 2000Results of examination of ticks Ixodes ricinus for the presenceof meningoencephalitis virus, 2000

LokalitaLocality

Typ lokalityType

of locality

Datum odbÏruSampling day

PoËet klÌöùat / Number of ticksV˝sledek

Resultnymfynymphs

samcimales

samicefemales

Praha 4 ñ KrËsk˝ les LP 14. 6. 2000 80 60 110 negativnÌ / negativePraha 4 ñ ToËn· L 20. 6. 2000 40 1 5 negativnÌ / negative

L = les / forest, LP = lesopark / forest park

V prosinci 2000 byl potvrzen pozitivnÌ v˝sledek reizolace nymf z lokality KrËsk˝ les.In December 2000 a positive result of a re-isolation of nymphs originating from the locality of KrËsk˝ les was proved.

Zdroj / Source: SZ⁄

B3.5.2 Aerobiologick˝ monitoring ovzduöÌv Praze

Od 60. let 20. stoletÌ se zaËala v EvropÏ rychle roz-öi¯ovat sÌù monitorovacÌch stanic, kter· umoûÚujena z·kladÏ vz·jemnÈho porovn·nÌ v˝sledk˘ v˝-raznÏ up¯esnit p¯edpovÏdi v˝voje pylovÈ sezÛny.Pylov· sezÛna probÌh· kaûd˝ rok trochu jinak.D˘vodem je rozdÌln· meteorologick·, a tÌm i fe-nologick· situace v jednotliv˝ch letech, p¯edevöÌmv˝voj pr˘mÏrn˝ch dennÌch teplot a vlhkosti. V jed-notliv˝ch letech se navÌc v˝znamnÏ liöÌ intenzitapylovÈ sezÛny pro r˘znÈ rostlinnÈ druhy, tedymnoûstvÌ pylu, kterÈ urËitÈ rostliny na danÈm˙zemÌ uvolnÌ do ovzduöÌ a kterÈ tedy m˘ûe ovliv-Úovat mÌru potÌûÌ alergickÈho ËlovÏka. »esko-slovensko se zapojilo do sÌtÏ EvropskÈ pylovÈinformaËnÌ sluûby v roce 1992. V roce 2001 bylo na˙zemÌ »eskÈ republiky v provozu celkem 11 mo-nitorovacÌch stanic PylovÈ informaËnÌ sluûby.

Praûsk· stanice zaËala pracovat v b¯eznu 1993. DoËervna 1995 byla umÌstÏna na poliklinice Karlovon·mÏstÌ, potÈ byla z provoznÌch d˘vod˘ p¯emÌstÏnado are·lu St·tnÌho zdravotnÌho ˙stavu ve ärob·-rovÏ ulici. V roce 2001 byla v provozu od 5. b¯eznado konce ¯Ìjna (v dobÏ p¯Ìpravy tohoto p¯ÌspÏvkubyla jeötÏ v provozu, tedy koncem z·¯Ì 2001).

V Praze a obecnÏ v »eskÈ republice pat¯Ì k nejv˝-znamnÏjöÌm aeroalergen˘m v jarnÌm obdobÌ (do-minuje pyl strom˘) pylov· zrna b¯Ìzy (Betula),v öiröÌm pojetÌ cel· ËeleÔ Betulaceae; pyl jednotli-v˝ch z·stupc˘ tÈto Ëeledi vykazuje znaËnou zk¯Ì-ûenou reaktivitu. To znamen·, ûe ËlovÏk alergick˝na jeden druh tÈto Ëeledi m˘ûe mÌt potÌûe i p¯ikontaktu s dalöÌmi jejÌmi z·stupci. V letnÌm obdobÌjsou jednoznaËnÏ nejv˝znamnÏjöÌ skupinou aero-alergen˘ tr·vy (Poaceae). TakÈ pyl trav se vyznaËujevelmi silnou zk¯Ìûenou reaktivitou mezi jednotli-v˝mi z·stupci. V˝raznÏ takÈ v tomto obdobÌ stoup·koncentrace spor plÌsnÌ v ovzduöÌ, p¯edevöÌm roduCladosporium a Alternaria. Pro podzimnÌ obdobÌje typick· dominance pylu plevel˘, p¯edevöÌm pe-lyÚku (Artemisia). Pylov· zrna ambrÛzie (Ambrosia),kter· jsou d˘leûit˝m alergizujÌcÌm aeroalergenemv MaÔarsku, na Slovensku a Ë·steËnÏ i na jiûnÌMoravÏ, nehr·la dosud v praûskÈm ovzduöÌ tak v˝-znamnou roli. V poslednÌch letech se vöak tato zrnapravidelnÏ objevujÌ ve spektru praûsk˝ch aeroaler-gen˘ konce lÈta a zaË·tku podzimu (viz Obr. B3.5).S ohledem na explozivnÌ öÌ¯enÌ ambrÛzie po EvropÏv poslednÌch letech je proto t¯eba v˝skyt tohotoalergenu peËlivÏ monitorovat a urychlenÏ zah·jitpreventivnÌ opat¯enÌ k eradikaci tohoto plevele

B3.5.2 Aerobiological monitoringin Prague

Since 1960s the network of monitoring stations,enabling on the basis of mutual results comparisonto make the predictions of the pollen season moreprecise, become to grow fast in Europe. The pollenseason course is slightly different every year. Thereason for is the various weather conditions and sophenological conditions in respective year, namelythe development in average daily temperature andhumidity. Furthermore, in respective years the inten-sity of pollen season is different in various speciesof flora, that the amount of pollen, which certainplant species growing over the area release into airand which thus may effect the level of troubles to anallergic person. Czechoslovakia joined the networkof the European Pollen Information Service in 1992.In 2001 there were in total eleven monitoring stationsof the Pollen Information Service operated on theterritory of the Czech Republic.

The Prague Pollen Monitoring Station of the CzechPollen Information Service was put in operation inMarch 1993. Till June 1995 the Monitoring Stationwas located in the premises or the Policlinic at KarlovoSquare, and then due to operational reasons it wasmoved into the premises of the State Health Institute(St·tnÌ zdravotnÌ ˙stav ñ SZ⁄) in ärob·rova Street.In 2001 it was under operation from March 5 till endof October (in time when this paper is being preparedit is still working at the end of September 2001).

During the spring period (when tree species pollendominates) pollen grains of birch (Betula) belong tothe most important aeroallergens in Prague andgenerally in the Czech Republic as well. Taken ina broader sense this means entire family of Betula-ceae. Pollen of single species of this family featuresignificant cross-reactivity. Therefore, an individualallergic to one genus of this group can show clinicalproblems when put in contact with other membersof this family. Pollen of single species of this familydisplay significant cross-reactivity. During the summerperiod grass (Poaceae) pollen form the most importantgroup of aeroallergens. They also display a signi-ficant cross-reactivity among single members. Con-centration of mould spores usually increases inthis period too. This applies most significantly toCladosporium and Alternaria genus. For the autumnperiod the dominance of weed pollen is typical,mostly mugwort (Artemisia). Pollen grains of ragweed(Ambrosia), which are important aeroallergens inHungary, Slovakia and in part in south Moraviahave not played a significant role in Prague to date.However, in recent years, these pollen grains regularlyoccur in the spectrum of aeroallergens found inPrague at the brink of autumn (see Figure B3.5).With respect to the explosive spreading of ragweed



v oblasti Prahy. V srpnu takÈ obvykle vrcholÌ se-zÛna plÌsnÌ, koncentrace jejich spor v ovzduöÌ ¯·-dovÏ p¯evyöuje koncentraci vöech pylov˝ch aler-gen˘ tohoto obdobÌ.

Pylov· sezÛna 2001 byla v Praze podpr˘mÏrnÏslab·. SezÛna lÌsky (Corylus) a olöe (Alnus) tr-vala podobnÏ jako v p¯edchozÌm roce od ˙norado konce b¯ezna, praûsk· stanice p¯i zah·jenÌ pro-vozu v prvnÌm b¯eznovÈm t˝dnu pravidelnÏ za-chytÌ aû konec sezÛny olöe. SezÛna b¯Ìzy (Betula)probÌh· vûdy spoleËnÏ se sezÛnou jasanu (Fraxi-nus). B¯Ìza rozkvetla o jeden aû dva t˝dny pozdÏjineû v p¯edchozÌch letech, tedy aû kolem 10. dubna,a byla mÌrnÏ podpr˘mÏrn·. V˝raznÏjöÌho vrcholu,kter˝ byl vöak slaböÌ neû v p¯edchozÌch letech, do-s·hla v obdobÌ od 18. dubna do 4. kvÏtna 2001, potÈkoncentrace tohoto alergenu v ovzduöÌ jiû pozvolnaklesala. RovnÏû sezÛna trav (Poaceae) se v roce 2001rozbÏhla o dva aû t¯i t˝dny pozdÏji neû v roce 2000,tedy v polovinÏ kvÏtna, a byla podpr˘mÏrn·. PrvnÌmenöÌ vrchol se objevil na p¯elomu kvÏtna a Ëervna,svÈho vrcholnÈho maxima potom dos·hla sezÛnatrav na p¯elomu Ëervna a Ëervence. V pr˘bÏhu Ëer-vence se v ovzduöÌ Prahy objevovalo pylu travpomÏrnÏ m·lo. S nÏkolika menöÌmi vrcholy sevzduön· koncentrace tohoto pylu drûela na aler-gologicky v˝znamnÈ ˙rovni do konce Ëervence.PotÈ jiû mnoûstvÌ pylu trav trvale klesalo. Pe-lynÏk (Artemisia) se zaËal pravidelnÏ objevovatv ovzduöÌ v poslednÌ dek·dÏ Ëervence. Jeho se-zÛna byla rovnÏû spÌöe podpr˘mÏrn·, s vrcholemkolem 15. srpna. AmbrÛzie (Ambrosia) mÏla letosrovnÏû pomÏrnÏ slabou sezÛnu. V ovzduöÌ se tentoalergen zaËal pravidelnÏ objevovat od polovinysrpna, v dobÏ p¯Ìpravy tohoto p¯ehledu (konec z·¯Ì)jejÌ sezÛna pomalu doznÌvala. KoncentracÌ, kterÈby mohly vyvol·vat alergickÈ potÌûe, dosahovalaambrÛzie v obdobÌ 16.ñ20. srpna a na p¯elomu srpnaa z·¯Ì. V pr˘bÏhu z·¯Ì byla celkov· koncentracevöech pylov˝ch zrn v ovzduöÌ v d˘sledku velmideötivÈho poËasÌ jiû jen velmi nÌzk·.

P¯edkl·danÈ grafy zachycujÌ koncentraci nejv˝-znamnÏjöÌch pylov˝ch alergen˘ v praûskÈm ovzduöÌza poslednÌch 5 let, tedy od roku 1997 do koncez·¯Ì 2001. PylovÈ anal˝zy v roce 2001 prov·dÏlSZ⁄ ñ Monitoring zdravÌ a ûivotnÌho prost¯edÌ,ärob·rova 48, 100 42 Praha 10.

throughout Europe observed during the last decadesmonitoring of these allergens is of prime importance.What is also necessary is to promptly implementpreventive measures to eradicate ragweed fromthe Prague region. In August a peak concentrationof mould spores usually occurs being an order ofmagnitude higher than concentration of all otheraeroallergens.

The pollen season 2001 was weak below average.The season of hazel (Corylus) and alder (Alnus)lasted approximately for the same time as in theprevious year from February till end of March.The Prague Monitoring Station regularly capturesonly the end of the alder season, when beginningits every year operation. The birch (Betula) seasonis usually simultaneous with that of ash (Fraxinus).Birch bloomed by one or two weeks later than inprevious years, that is about April 10 and the seasonwas slightly bellow average. A more significant peak,which however was weaker than those in the pre-vious years it reached in the period from April 18through May 4, 2001, then the airborne allergenconcentration gradually decreased. In 2001 the grass(Poaceae) season started by two or three weeks laterthan in 2000 that is in the middle of May and wasbellow average. The first minor peak of the con-centration of this pollen appeared at the brink of Mayand June, the maximum peak the season attainedat the brink of June and July. In July there was rela-tively small amount of grass pollen in the Pragueair. Passing through several smaller peaks the airconcentration of this pollen remained at the allergo-logically significant level till the end of July. Thenthe amount of grass pollen dropped in monotonousmanner. The occurrence of mugwort (Artemisia)began to appear regularly in air in the last decadeof July. It season was rather bellow average havingits peak around August 15. The ragweed (Ambro-sia) season was also relatively weak this year. Thisallergen started to appear regularly in the air ofPrague since the middle of August and at the tomeof this overview preparation (end of September) itsseason has been slowly fading. Concentrations, whichcould cause some allergic troubles, ambrosia pollenreached in the period from August 16 to 20 andat the brink of September. In September the overallairborne pollen concentration was very low only dueto very rainy weather.

Concentrations of the most significant airbornepollen allergens in Prague air during the last fiveyears are shown in graphs, that is since 1997 till theend of September 2001. In 2001 all pollen analyseswere performed at the SZ⁄ ñ Monitoring of Healthand Environment, ärob·rova Str. 48, 100 42 Praha 10.



Obr. B3.5 Koncentrace pylov˝ch alergen˘ v ovzduöÌ, Praha 1997ñ2001 (1. Ë·st)Concentrations of pollen allergens in air, Prague 1997ñ2001 (part 1)

Zdroj / Source: PIS



t˝den / week25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

600

800

1 000

400

200

0

c) ATREMISIA ñ pelynÏk / mugworth

ËervenecJuly

srpenAugust

z· Ì̄September

poËe

tpy

lov˝ch

zrn/m

numberofgrains/m

3 3

19971998199920002001

a) POACEAE ñ tr·vy / grass1 000

800

18

10

19

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28t˝den / week

t˝den / week

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

600

400

200

0

7 000

6 000

5 000

4 000

3 000

2 000

1 000

0

b) BETULA ñ b¯Ìza / birch

19971998199920002001

19971998199920002001

kvÏtenMay

ËervenJune

ËervenecJuly

srpenAugust

b¯ezenMarch

dubenApril

kvÏtenMay

ËervenJune

poËe

tpy

lov˝ch

zrn/m

numberofgrains/m

3 3poËe

tpy

lov˝ch

zrn/m

numberofgrains/m

3 3

Obr. B3.5 Koncentrace pylov˝ch alergen˘ v ovzduöÌ, Praha 1997ñ2001 (2. Ë·st)Concentrations of pollen allergens in air, Prague 1997ñ2001 (part 2)

Zdroj / Source: PIS

Obr. B3.6 Koncentrace pylov˝ch alergen˘, Praha 2001Concentrations of pollen allergens in Prague in 2001

Zdroj / Source: PIS



e) ALNUS ñ olöe / alder

t˝den / week

t˝den / week

32

10

33

11 12

34

13

35

14 15 16

36 37

17

38

18

39

19

40

2120

400

1 000

1 200

1 400

1 600

1 800

500

600

200

400

600

800

300

100

200

0

0

d) AMBROSIA ñ ambrÛzie / ragweed

b¯ezenMarch

dubenApril

kvÏtenMay

srpenAugust

z· Ì̄September

poËe

tpy

lov˝ch

zrn/m

numberofgrains/m

3 3poËe

tpy

lov˝ch

zrn/m

numberofgrains/m

3 3

19971998199920002001

19971998199920002001

t˝den / week26 28 30 32 34 36 38 4022 242018161412

3 500

2 500

1 500

500

0

4 000

3 000

2 000

1 000

10

poËe

tpy

lov˝ch

zrn/m

numberofgrains/m

3 3

kvÏtenMay

ËervenJune

ËervenecJuly

srpenAugust

b¯ezenMarch

z· Ì̄September

ALNUS ñ olöe /BETULA ñ b Ì̄za /POACEAE ñ tr·vy /ARTEMISIA ñ pelynÏk /AMBROSIA ñ ambrÛzie /

alderbirch

grassmugwort

ragweed

Obr. B3.7 Koncentrace pylu ambrÛzie v ovzduöÌ, Praha 1993ñ2001Concentrations of ragweed pollen in air in Prague, 1993ñ2001

Zdroj / Source: PIS



1993

1 100

1 000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

01994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

poËe

tpy

lov˝ch

zrn/m

numberofgrains/m

3 3

Documents

STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL …envis.praha-mesto.cz/(blcy3g45jv5km23u5btg25mk)/rocenky/Pr_01pdf/kap_B3.pdf133 / LANDSCAPE Prahy Hall Druh pozemku podle kategorií katastru