1

PUBLIC NOTICE

Inthematterof

OkhlaEnclavePlotHolderWelfareAssociationV/s

UnionofIndiaandothersinI.A.no.8&9inCWPno.876/1996

In compliance of the order dated 18.06.2016, a report in theDurga Buildermatter has been

submittedtoHon'bleArbitrator formerJusticeSh.VikramajitSenSupremeCourtof Indiaon28.10.2017.OntherequestofthePlotHolderAssociationsandsomeindividualclaimants,theHon'bleArbitratorhasaskedtohostthereportwith enclosures on departmentwebsite for public reference. Copy of report alongwith claimants list isaccordinglyenclosedfortheinformationofallconcerned.

N.S.ChauhanSeniorTownPlanner

Faridabad.

2

3

REPORT

Inthematterof

OkhlaEnclavePlotHolderWelfareAssociation

V/s

UnionofIndiaandothersinI.A.no.8&9inCWPno.876/1996

4

BeforeTheHonbleArbitratorJusticeSh.VikramajitSen,SupremeCourtofIndia(Retd.)

Inthematterof

I.A.NOS.8&9inWritPetition(Civil)No(s).876/1996

OkhlaEnclavePlotHolderWelfareAssociation

Petitioner(s)

V/s

UnionofIndiaandothers

Respondents(s)

WithI.ANo.1inI.A.No.7,8,1112inI.A.Nos.8and9andI.A.NO.5inI.ANos.1112

AndI.A.No.5inI.A.Nos.1112

AndI.A.Nos..of2015

AndI.A.No.171inI.A.Nos.,8and9

inWritPetition(C)no.876of1996

5

ReportofthecommitteeconstitutedbyDirectorGeneralTown&CountryPlanning,Haryanavideorderdated16

082016 incomplianceoforders dated23072016passedbyHonbleArbitratorMr. JusticeSh.VikramajitSen,

FormerJudgeofSupremeCourt inthematterofOkhlaEnclavePlotHoldersWelfareAssociation andothersVs.

UnionofIndiaandothers.

TheHonbleSupremeCourtofIndiaintheabovereferredcaseshasappointedHonbleMr.JusticeSh.VikramajitSen,

FormerJudgeofSupremeCourt asArbitrator toresolvethedisputesbetweenthepartiesvideorderdated2701

2016. The Honble Arbitrator vide procedural order no. 7 dated 23072016 passed interalia orders and the

operativepartofthesaidproceduralorderinparano.2isreproducedasunder:

Aftermuch deliberation, ithasbeen further decided that toundertakeallotment, it is imperative thata listof

eligibleallotteesisfirstdrawnupasitappearsthatinalotofcases,multiplesaledeedsoragreementshavebeen

wrongfullyandillegallyexecutedonthebasisofasingleallotment.Insuchcircumstances,ithasbeenagreedthatthe

DirectorGeneralTownCountryPlanning(DGTCP)alongwitharepresentativefromtheBuilderandarepresentative

6

fromtheconcernedAssociationswill inviterepresentations/applicationsalongwith theallotment documentsfrom

all the claimants/ allottees andwill examine and scrutinize these applications, asper all the existing rules and

guidelines,toidentifygenuineallotteesandpruneoutthecasesofwrongful/multipleallotments.....

IncomplianceoftheordersofHonbleArbitratoracommitteewasconstitutedbyDirectorGeneral,Town&country

Planning,Haryanavideorderdated18062016consisting:

(i) SeniorTownPlanner,Faridabad(Chairman)

(ii) DistrictTownPlanner,Faridabad(Member)

(iii) RepresentativeofDeputyCommissioner,Faridabad(Member)

(iv) Representativeofthecolonizer(Member)ofDurgaBuildersPvt.Ltd.

(v) Representativeoftheconcernedassociation(onlywheredocumentsarethroughAssociation)

Sh.N.S.Chauhan,SeniorTownPlanner,Faridabad,Sh.AnilDabasDistrictTownPlanner,Faridabad,Tehsildar

Faridabad as representative ofDeputy Commissioner, Faridabad, Sh. Kishori Lal ,General Secretary,Durga

7

BuilderPlotHolderWelfareAssociation,Sh.M.P.Pandey,GeneralSecretary,OkhlaEnclavePlotHolderWelfare

Association,Sh.ManjeetSingh,representativeofDurgaBuilderPlotBookingHolderForum,Sh.RakeshVerma,

Okhla EnclavePlotHolder (Allottees) Forum, Sh. Sanjeev Uppal representativeof Builder were associated

duringthescrutinyprocess.

TheHonbleArbitratorintheorderno.5dated7052016hassetthefollowingconditionstodetermine

entitlementofeachplotholder.

Plotholdersshouldhavemadebookingsalongwithentirepaymenttowardscostoflandpriorto07.04.1997.

Further, such plot holders should have paid/deposited the entire development charges with the Haryana

Governmentupto31.12.1999,intermsofHonbleSupremeCourtorderdated02.12.1999.

The plot holder who have made bookings along with the entire payment towards cost of land prior to

07.04.1997,buthadnot madepaymentstowards theDevelopmentcharges interms ofSupremeCourtorder

dated02.12.1999,canbe consideredprovided theyarewilling topaytheDevelopment chargesaswouldbe

requiredonthedateofcarryingouttheactualdevelopment

8

Themultiplicity and duplicity of claims i.e.more than one claim from one family,will not be considered as

eligible.Further,ifanypersonisalreadyinoccupationofaplotillegallyorbyencroachment,hewillsimilarlynot

beconsideredforanyfurtherallotment.

Intheproceduralorderdated23072016itwasdirectedthatthesaidexercisefordecidingeligibleallotteewill

bestartedwiththeNPNLcategory. DirectorGeneral,Town&CountryPlanning,Haryana incomplianceofthe

orders issuedpublic noticeon 18082016 innewspaperdated18082016 invitingapplications to file the

claimsaccompanyingwithsupportingdocumentsregardingallotment/bookingofplotinNoProfitNo

Losscategory(hereafterreferredasNPNL)intheofficeofSeniorTownPlanner,Sector12,Faridabadupto16

092016.Afterreceivingapplications firstmeetingofthecommittee washeldon27102016 alongwith Dr.

Monika Gusain, Standing Council on behalf of Government of Haryana, District Town Planner, Faridabad,

advocate of the concerned associations, representativeofplotholders associations. In themeeting itwas

decided that allassociationwill prepare draft format covering maximum informationrelatedtobooking

9

/allotmentofplots.Thecommitteedecidedthattheformatshouldbesimplewithmoredetailssothatrecord

ofclaimantscanbemaintainedregardingpaymentsmadeforbookingofplot,developmentcharge,date/year

wisepaymentsmadetothedeveloper/department,detailsofplotsize/changesintheplotno./sizeifany,land

costpersqyd.,bifurcationoflandcost/developmentchargepaidtimetotimeorinonego,detailsofallotment

ofplot,detailof BuilderBuyerAgreement,detailsof saledeed,approvalofbuildingplansandany specific

detailsproducedbyclaimants.Thescrutinyofdocumentswasinitiatedon21102016,buttherepresentativeon

behalfof thebuilderobjected thatuntiland unless copyof record received fromclaimants isprovided to

them,theverificationshouldnotbecommenced.Itwaspointedouttothemthatexceptdetailsofclaimants

received from associations, thedocuments of individuals were collectedby their staffonly in theofficeof

STP/DTP and theywere also asked to submit the original record in STP officewithin two days aftermaking

necessarycopiesaspertheirrequirementandatleastthesecasescanbeputupforverificationbynextdate

ofhearing.

Theformatwasfinalizedbythecommitteeon6112016andthescrutinyofdocumentswasinitiatedon7112016.

Duringthefirstdayof scrutinyrepresentativeofdeveloperhadpointedout that asperthedirectionof Honble

10

Arbitrator,copiesofdocumentsreceivedfromclaimantbeprovidedfirstsothatitcanbeexaminedbythem.Since

itwasgoingtotakelotoftime,thereforetherepresentativeofthebuilderwasadvisedthesameintheofficeSTPso

thatprocessofscrutinyofapplicationsreceivedbyhisstaffintheofficeofSeniorTownPlanner/DistrictTown

Planner Faridabad can be initiated to avoid delay and subsequently the representative of coloniser can take

photocopy of the applications/ documents received from claimants. For the above said reason scrutiny process

actualycommencedon21112016. Initially average30cases were takenup for scrutiny per sittingwhichwas

increased toaverage40 perdaykeeping inview theno.ofclaims tobeheardandalso themeetingdays were

increasedfromthriceaweektofivedaysaweekkeepinginviewthevolumeofwork.

Although the claimantappearingbefore the committeewereadvised thatwhat sortofdocuments they

shouldproduceandwhatshouldnotbeproducedbeforethecommitteefortheverification/scrutinyofdocuments.

But itwasobservedthatmostoftheclaimantscamewithallthecorrespondencesmadewiththecoloniser and it

tookmoretimetoscrutinizetheclaimsinspiteofallnecessaryhelpbythememberofthecommitteetoindividual

claimant.Duringthescrutinyitwasobservedthatinmostofthecasesplotsweretransferredfromoneallotteeto

anotheraftertakingtransferchargesbythedeveloperandtherewaspossibility/chancethatreceiptsintwonames

11

foroneplotcanbereproducedbytheotherclaimantstherefore,afterthirddayofscrutinyitwasdecidedthatthe

originalpaymentreceiptsshouldbestampedsothatitcannotbereproducedbyanyotherclaimants.

ThecommitteealsoobservedthatinmanycasesGPAorSPAholderhaveapplieddirectlyforallotmentofplot

under their namewithout executing saledeed in their favour by the original allottee therefore the name of the

originalallotteewastakenuponlywhilereferringnameofGPAorSPAholdertoknowthathowmanyapplication

havebeenreceivedthroughGPA/SPA.Itisalsoobservedinsomecasesthattheownerofplothaveexecutedwillor

agreement to sale in their favour. The application submittedbyGPA/ SPAholder in theirownname havebeen

consideredbythecommitteesincetheyhadauthoritytorepresenttheircase.

Beforestartingtheprocessofverificationoforiginaldocuments,thecommitteeobservedthatasper

departmentpolicy on NoProfitNoLoss(hereafter referredasNPNL)25%oftotalno.ofresidentialplotsof

sizes125 sqmts. to225 sqmts,orotherwise approved specifically in the layoutplan byDirector Town and

CountryPlanningare keptunderNPNLcategoryplots.But in thisparticularcase on thedirectionofHonble

PunjabandHaryanaHighcourt inCWPno.3311o