sumit agarawal 09kb028

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    1/17

    COST CONCEPT

    PRESENTED BYSUMIT AGARAAWL

    09KB028

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    2/17

    CASE STUDY OF COST SHEET

    CAMPBELL Company is a metal and wood cutting manufactures,selling products to the home construction market. Consider thefollowing data for 2009.

    Sand paper 20,000

    Material holding cost 7,00,000 Lubricant and coolants 50,000

    Misc. indirect manufacturing labour 4,00,000

    Direct manufacturing labour 30,00,000

    Direct materials inventory Jan1,2009 4,00,000

    Direct material inventory Dec.31,2009 50,00,000 Finished goods inventory Jan1,2009 10,00,000

    Finished goods inventory Dec.31,2009 15,00,000

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    3/17

    Work in process inventory Dec.31,2009 1,40,000

    Plant-leasing costs 5,40,000

    Deprecation plant equipment 3,60,000

    Work in process inventory Jan1,2009 1,00,000

    Property taxes on plant equipment 40,000

    Fire insurance on plant equipment 30,000 Direct material purchased 46,00,000

    Revenues 1,36,00,000

    Marketing promotions 6,00,000

    Marketing salaries 10,00,000

    Distribution costs 7,00,000

    Customer-service costs 10,00,000

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    4/17

    INFORMATION

    1. Suppose that both the direct material cost and the plant leasingcost are for the production of 9,00,000 units. Assume that the plantleasing cost is a fixed cost and prepare the cost sheet.

    2. . For all manufacturing items, classify costs as direct costs orindirect cost and indicate by V or F whether each is basically avariable cost or a fixed cost.

    3. Suppose Campbell company manufacture 10,00,000 unit. Repeatthe computation in requirement 2 for direct materials and plantleasing costs. Assume the implied cost behavior patterns persist.

    4. As a management consultant, explain concisely to the companypresident why the unit cost for direct materials did not change in

    requirements 2 and 3 but the unit cost for leasing costs did change.

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    5/17

    Direct Factory Material

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    6/17

    Campbell CompanySchedule of cost sheet of goods manufactured

    For the year ended December 31,2009

    PARTICULAR AMOUNT RS AMOUNT RS

    Direct material

    Beginning inventory Jan1,2009Add: Purchase of direct materials

    Cost of direct material avail for use

    Less: Ending inventory,Dec31,2009

    Direct material consumed

    Direct manufacturing labour

    Prime cost

    4,00,000

    46,00,000

    50,00,000

    5,00,000

    45,00,000 (V)

    30,00,000 (V)

    75,00,000

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    7/17

    Indirect Factory Expenses

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    8/17

    FACTORY COST

    PARTICULAR AMOUNT RS AMOUNT RS

    Indirect manufacturing costs

    Sandpaper

    Materials-handling costs

    Lubricants and coolants

    Misc indirect manufacture labourPlant leasing costs

    Deprecation plant equipment

    Property taxes on plant equipment

    Fire insurance on plant equipment

    Add work in process Jan1 2009

    Less work in process Dec31 2009

    Factory cost

    20,000 (V)

    7,00,000 (V)

    50,000 (V)

    4,00,000 (V)5,40,000 (F)

    3,60,000 (F)

    40,000 (F)

    30,000 (F)

    1,00,000

    1,40,000

    21,40,000

    (40,000)

    96,00,000

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    9/17

    SELLING AND DISTRIBUTION

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    10/17

    SELLING AND DISTRIBUTION EXPENSES

    PARTICULAR AMOUNT RS AMOUNT RS

    Cost of goods manufacture

    Add finished good inventory Jan 1Less finished good inventory Dec 31

    Cost of goods sold

    Marketing promotion

    Marketing salaries

    Distribution costs

    Customer service costs

    COST OF SALE

    10,00,000

    15,00,000

    6,00,00010,00,000

    7,00,000

    10,00,000

    96,00,000

    (5,00,000)

    91,00,000

    33,00,000

    1,24,00,000

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    11/17

    SALES REVENUE

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    12/17

    SALES REVENUE

    PARTICULAR AMOUNT RS AMOUNTRS

    Cost of SALE

    Profit

    Total revenue

    12,00,000

    1,24,00,000

    12,00,000

    1,36,00,000

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    13/17

    DECISION MAKING

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    14/17

    Impact of fixed cost and variable cost in different production line

    FOR 9,00,000 UNIT

    Direct material unit cost(V) = direct material used = 45,00,000 =Rs5 per unit

    unit produced 9,00,000

    Plant leasing unit cost (F) = plant leasing costs = 5,40,000 =Rs0.6per unit

    unit produced 9,00,000

    FOR 10,00,000 UNIT

    Direct material unit cost(V) = direct material used = 50,00,000 =Rs5 per unit

    unit produced 10,00,000

    Plant leasing unit cost (F) = plant leasing costs = 5,40,000 =Rs0.54per unit

    unit produced 10,00,000

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    15/17

    BEP and PV ratio analysis Contribution =Sales variable cost

    1,36,00,000

    81,30,000 = 34,70,000

    PV ratio= Contribution *100 = 34,70,000 *100 =25.15%

    Sales 1,36,00,000

    BEP (RS) = Total fixed cost = 9,70,000 = RS 385659

    PV ratio 25.15%

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    16/17

    Managerial decision

    Manager should more emphasis in maximum utilizationof resources.

    The BEP of this product is RS 385659 so if thecompany produce this much amount of goods then the

    company will face no profit no loss . The increase in production does not lead to decrease

    in variable costbut the fixed cost will reduced. To increase the profit the total cost is to be reduced.

    Manager should take important decision regarding themaximization of output

  • 8/3/2019 sumit agarawal 09kb028

    17/17