15
Supporting Information Self-assembling peptide hydrogels functionalized with LN- and BDNF- mimicking epitopes synergistically enhance peripheral nerve regeneration Shuhui Yang 1* , Chong Wang 2* , Jinjin Zhu 3* , Changfeng Lu 2,4 , Haitao Li 2 , Fuyu Chen 2 , Jiaju Lu 1 , Zhe Zhang 1 , Xiaoqing Yan 1,5 , He Zhao 1 , Xiaodan Sun 1 , Lingyun Zhao 1 , Jing Liang 6 , Yu Wang 2 , Jiang Peng 2 , and Xiumei Wang 1 1. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 2. Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China; Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province 226007, China 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine & Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal System Degeneration and Regeneration Translational Research of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310016, China 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100191, China 5. School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 6. Department of Pediatrics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, No. 406 Jiefang Nan Road, Tianjin 300211, China * Contributed equally to this work Corresponding author: Xiumei Wang, E-mail: [email protected], Phone: 86-10-62782966. Fax: 86-10-62771160. Jiang Peng, E-mail: [email protected]. Yu Wang, E-mail: [email protected].

Supporting Information - TheranosticsSupporting Information Self-assembling peptide hydrogels functionalized with LN- and BDNF- mimicking epitopes synergistically enhance peripheral

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Supporting Information

    Self-assembling peptide hydrogels functionalized with LN- and BDNF- mimicking epitopes synergistically

    enhance peripheral nerve regeneration

    Shuhui Yang1*, Chong Wang2*, Jinjin Zhu3*, Changfeng Lu2,4, Haitao Li2, Fuyu Chen2, Jiaju Lu1, Zhe Zhang1,

    Xiaoqing Yan1,5, He Zhao1, Xiaodan Sun1, Lingyun Zhao1, Jing Liang6, Yu Wang2, Jiang Peng2, and Xiumei

    Wang1

    1. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials of

    Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084,

    China

    2. Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China; Co-innovation Center of

    Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province 226007, China

    3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    & Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal System Degeneration and Regeneration Translational Research of

    Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310016, China

    4. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100191, China

    5. School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

    6. Department of Pediatrics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, No. 406 Jiefang Nan Road, Tianjin 300211,

    China

    * Contributed equally to this work

    Corresponding author: Xiumei Wang, E-mail: [email protected], Phone: 86-10-62782966. Fax:

    86-10-62771160. Jiang Peng, E-mail: [email protected]. Yu Wang, E-mail:

    [email protected].

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • Methods

    Cell proliferation assay

    The proliferation of RSCs on different hydrogels was evaluated. 50 μL of peptide solution was loaded

    directly into the wells of a 96-well plate, and then 100 μL of culture medium was gently added onto the peptide

    solution. After incubation for 15 min at 37 °C, the medium was removed and changed at least twice to equilibrate

    the hydrogels. RSCs were seeded on the surface of the hydrogel at a density of 8 × 103 cells/well (n = 4), and

    the medium was changed with fresh medium every 2 days. Cell proliferation in different groups was assessed

    using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, DOJINDO, Tokyo, Japan). After culture for 1, 4, and 7 days, the samples

    were incubated with 10% CCK-8 working solution in cell culture medium for 3 h at 37 °C. Then, 100 μL of the

    supernatant was transferred to a new 96-well plate, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using an EnSpire

    Multimode Plate Reader (PerkinElmer, USA).

  • Table S1. Primer sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR

    Gene Primers (F=forward, R=reverse)

    GAPDH F: ATGATTCTACCCACGGCAAG

    R: CTGGAAGATGGTGATGGGTT

    NGF F: CGCTCTCCTTCACAGAGTTTT

    R: GACATTACGCTATGCACCTCAGA

    BDNF F: TCTACGAGACCAAGTGTAATCCCA

    R: CTTATGAACCGCCAGCCAAT

    CNTF F: ATGGCTTTCGCAGAGCAAAC

    R: CAACGATCAGTGCTTGCCAC

    IGF-2 F: GAACAACAATAGCCGCCCAAACTC

    R: CATGTTCTGTTCCTCTCCTTGGGT

    S100 F: GTTGCCCTCATTGATGTCT

    R: CTGCTCTTTGATTTCCTCC

    MBP F: TCTGGCAAGGACTCACACAC

    R: AAATCTGCTGAGGGACAGGC

    NCAM F: TTCAGTGACGACAGTTCGGAGC

    R: TGCGAAGACCTTGAGGTGGAT

    PMP22 F: TGTACCACATCCGCCTTGG

    R: GAGCTGGCAGAAGAACAGGAAC

    NRP2 F: CTTGCTCCCTCTTTGCTG

    R: TTCCTTGTGGTGTCTTCTG

    VEGF F: ACCATGCCAAGTGGTGAAGT

    R: GGGCTTCATCATTGCAGCAG

    P0 F: AAGTCTATGGTGCTGTGGGC

    R: CCCATACCTAGTGGGCACTTT

  • Table S2. Physicochemical properties of self-assembling backbone and functional motifs

    Sequences Net charge at pH=7 Hydrophilic residue ratio Description

    (RADA)4 0.0 50% Backbone

    G2-IKVAV 1.0 14% LA motif

    G2-RGIDKRHWNSQ 2.1 54% BDNF motif

    G2-IKVAV-G2-RGIDKRHWNSQ 3.1 40% Dual-motif

  • Table S3. Estimated secondary structure fractions of different peptides

    Peptides Secondary structure fractions (%)*

    H (r) H (d) S (r) S (d) Turn Unrd

    RAD 4.8 0.0 32.3 14.1 15.4 33.4

    RAD-IKV 8.5 11.4 0.0 8.4 24.9 46.9

    RAD-RGI 4.8 1.9 0.0 6.1 32.2 55.0

    RAD-IKV-GG-RGI 3.7 6.3 11.4 9.2 26.4 43.1

    RAD/IKV 6.5 0.0 36.4 15.8 12.3 29.0

    RAD/RGI 1.9 2.7 33.8 14.1 15.9 31.7

    RAD/IKV-GG-RGI 2.5 0.0 28.6 11.7 20.4 36.9

    RAD/IKV/RGI 2.1 0.1 32.8 13.1 19.4 32.4

    *Abbreviations: H (r), regular α-helix; H (d), distorted α-helix; S (r), regular β-strand; S (d), distorted β-strand;

    Turn, β-turn structure; Unrd, unordered structure. Total Sheet content = S (r) + S (d).

  • Table S4. Nanofiber width from molecular models and AFM measurements

    Peptides Wthe* Wadj** Wmea

    RAD 5.9 nm 12.1 nm 15.4 ± 2.1 nm

    RAD-IKV 8.3 nm 14.5 nm -***

    RAD-RGI 10.5 nm 16.7 nm -

    RAD-IKV-GG-RGI 13.0 nm 19.2 nm -

    RAD/IKV 10.7 nm 16.9 nm 18.1 ± 1.9 nm

    RAD/RGI 15.1 nm 21.3 nm 23.0 ± 1.5 nm

    RAD/IKV-GG-RGI 20.1 nm 26.3 nm 29.6 ± 2.2 nm

    RAD/IKV/RGI 15.1 nm 21.3 nm 21.6 ± 0.9 nm

    *According to the molecular model proposed in Figure 1A.

    **Wthe: theoretical fiber width; Wmea: measured fiber width by AFM; Wadj: adjusted theoretical fiber width

    considering the size effect of the AFM probe tip based on the estimation 𝑊𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 𝑊𝑡ℎ𝑒 + 2 (2𝑅𝑡𝐻 − 𝐻2)1/2,

    Rt = AFM tip size (~ 10 nm), H = sample height (~ 0.5 nm) [1, 2].

    ***No nanofiber formation was observed.

  • Figure S1. Analytical HPLC trace of RAD peptide.

    Figure S2. The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) of RAD peptide.

    10.12

    8'

    11.47

    2'

    12.24

    8'

    13.95

    0'

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    mV

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 min

    299.0 839.4 1379.8 1920.2 2460.6 3001.0

    Mass (m/z)

    0

    5.3E+4

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    % In

    ten

    sity

    Voyager Spec #1=>MC[BP = 1713.2, 53175]

    1713.24

  • Figure S3. Analytical HPLC trace of RAD-IKV peptide.

    Figure S4. The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) of RAD-IKV peptide.

    7.9

    72

    8.1

    87

    9.0

    38

    10.2

    00

    12.6

    33

    AU

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    0.50

    0.60

    Minutes

    0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00

    699.0 1359.4 2019.8 2680.2 3340.6 4001.0

    Mass (m/z)

    0

    2.4E+4

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    % In

    ten

    sity

    Voyager Spec #1[BP = 2338.6, 24086]

    2338.56

    2361.60

  • Figure S5. Analytical HPLC trace of RAD-RGI peptide.

    Figure S6. The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) of RAD-RGI peptide.

    7.7

    84'

    8.3

    92'

    8.9

    23'

    -200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    mV

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 min

    +Q1: 4 MCA scans from Sample 136 (04010019507-3-1 B Q SE) of 04010019507.wiff (Turbo Spray), Centroided Max. 6.1e7 cps.

    300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000m/z, Da

    0.0

    5.0e6

    1.0e7

    1.5e7

    2.0e7

    2.5e7

    3.0e7

    3.5e7

    4.0e7

    4.5e7

    5.0e7

    5.5e7

    6.0e7

    In

    te

    ns

    ity

    , c

    ps

    802.3

    1069.8

    642.1

    1604.0

    535.1 798.1665.5 820.2 1064.1638.6 946.9 1093.9385.3 1283.4565.5414.1 697.9 1661.51632.2 1718.01420.8 1924.91503.91214.5 1302.9322.3

  • Figure S7. Analytical HPLC trace of RAD-IKV-GG-RGI peptide.

    Figure S8. The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) of RAD-IKV-GG-RGI peptide.

    7.1

    52

    '

    7.4

    48

    '

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    mV

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 min

    699.0 1759.4 2819.8 3880.2 4940.6 6001.0

    Mass (m/z)

    0

    2.6E+4

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    % In

    ten

    sity

    Voyager Spec #1[BP = 3830.9, 26112]

    3830.87

  • Figure S9. The size of pores in different self-assembling peptide hydrogels. (A) Typical distribution of pore

    sizes in different groups. (B) Analysis of the mean diameter of pores. Values are represented as mean ± SD.

    Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc

    test (n = 3).

  • Figure S10. The average G’ and G’’ of self-assembling peptide hydrogels. The average G’ values were

    respectively 2942.6 ± 250.0 Pa, 4600.0 ± 101.4 Pa, 2629.7 ± 675.1 Pa, 3246.3 ± 426.6 Pa, and 2594.8 ± 502.9

    Pa. The average G’’ values were respectively 406.4 ± 51.4 Pa, 606.4 ± 116.7 Pa, 298.1 ± 64.7 Pa, 386.9 ± 39.0

    Pa, and 340.2 ± 35.4 Pa. Values are represented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-

    way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05, versus the G’ of RAD/IKV

    hydrogel. #P < 0.05, versus the G’’ of RAD/IKV hydrogel (n = 3).

  • Figure S11. The proliferation of RSCs on different peptide hydrogels after 1, 4, and 7 days. Values are

    represented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA),

    followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (equal variances) or Dunnett’s T3 post hoc test (unequal variances). *P < 0.05,

    and **P < 0.01 (n = 4).

  • Figure S12. Nerve graft preparation (A), implantation (B) and harvest of the nerve grafts at 7 days

    postoperatively (C) of the different groups.

  • Figure S13. Scheme of transverse section of regenerated nerve at 12 weeks after surgery.

    References

    [1] Hong Y, Legge RL, Zhang S, Chen P. Effect of amino acid sequence and pH on nanofiber formation of self-

    assembling peptides EAK16-II and EAK16-IV. Biomacromolecules. 2003; 4: 1433-42.

    [2] Horii A, Wang X, Gelain F, Zhang S. Biological designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds

    significantly enhance osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and 3-D migration. PLoS One. 2007; 2: e190.