Upload
dinhdung
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TEM Specimen Preparation by Focused Ion BeamSputtering - Optimisation of the Process
B. Köhler, G. Irmer, L. Bishoff, J.Teichert
- Außens telle EADQ Dresden -
Forschungszentrum Rossendorf e.V.Institut für Ionenstrahlphysik und MaterialforschungPostfach 510 119, D-01314 Dresden
machining of T EM lamella with Focused Ion Beamsputtering
advantages:
high positioning accuracylittle restriction on samle materials tress free-millingobservation of progress (SE M or S IM)
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
mashining ofT EM - lamella
region of
interest
initial specimen
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
mashining ofT EM - lamella
region of
interestpre-prepared
specimen
initial specimen
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
mashining ofT EM - lamella
region of
interest
TEM-observation
direction
pre-prepared
specimen
initial specimen
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
mashining ofT EM - lamella
ion beam
region of
interest
TEM-observation
direction
pre-prepared
specimen
initial specimen
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
mashining ofT EM - lamella
ion beam
region of
interest
TEM-observation
direction
pre-prepared
specimen
initial specimen
7(0���ODPHOODVSXWWHU�UHPRYDOLRQV
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
Example: lamella in a fracture mechanique specimen
Inclusion, which was thereason for the fracture
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
inclusion
levelingB . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
S i - lamella
(T U DD)
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
T EM images
S i - lamella
(T U DD)
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
T EM images
S i - lamella
(T U DD)
2 µm
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
T EM images
S i - lamella
(T U DD)
2 nm
machining of T EM lamella with Focused Ion Beamsputtering
advantages:high pos itioning accuracylittle res triction on sample materials tress free-millingobservation of progress (S EM or S IM images)
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
poss ible problems /disadvantages:amorphisationcontamination of the sample by Ga (at leastin the machined area)bending of the lamella due to s tress release
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
Example for bending:
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
aim varied parameter
avoidcontamination with Ga
substitute sourceGa Í S i , ...
reduce the thickness of the amorphisation layer
angle of incidenceenergyion mass
speed of machining (sputter efficiency)
sort of ions ,energy, current
reduce bending of lamella additional cuts for s tress relaxation
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
influence of the ion angle
can the penetration depth ( ==> the thickness of the of the dis turbed layer) reduced?
LRQ�EHDP
GDPDJHG�UDQJH
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
influence of the ion angle
can the penetration depth ( ==> the thickness of the of the dis turbed layer) reduced?
LRQ�EHDP
GDPDJHGUDQJH
0 20 40 60 80-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Si (30 keV) into Si
cos(α) * depth (0) is a good fit only for small α
dept
h / A
°
α
Monte Carlo s imulation (S R IM J. F . Z iegler, IBM)
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
0 30 60 90
100
200
300
400
500 Au 30kV Au 10kV Ga 10kV Ga 30kV Si 10kV Au 8kV Si 8kV Si 30kV
proj
ecte
d ra
nge/
°A
incident angele
S imulation:
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
s imulation results require experimental verification !
R aman Spectroscopy
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
triple mono-chromator
CCD
mirror
laser
polarisator
analysator
beamsplitter
microskopeobjective
sample
cryostate xy
spatial filter
T64000Jobin-YvonMicro-Raman-Spectrometer
table
sample
cryostate
mirror
macrochamber
microscope
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
R aman-meas urement of the thickness of the amorphous layer
IL Ic1
αc
200 400 600Raman shift (cm-1)
0
200
400
600
800
x 20c-S i
d
IL
Ia
Ic2
αc
αa
0
40
80
Cts
/s
x 20c-S i
a-S i
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
200 400 600Raman shift (cm-1)
0
200
400
600
800
0
40
80
Cts
/s
0
1
2
3
c-Si
x 20
x 20
sputtered area
portion of the amorphous layerS i wafer,sputtered with Ga ions(30 keV, 3°)
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
IL ILIc1
Ia
Ic2
d
αc αc
αa
measured intensities :
Ic1 : crystalline material onlyIa : from the amorphous layerIc2 : from crystalline material below the amorphous layer
a2 da ca
a cc2
I e 1I
α
β α= −α β
a2 dac2
cc1
I (1 r ) eI (1 r )
− α−= −c ar , r
c a,β βc a,α α - absorption cross section
- Raman scattering cross section
- reflection coefficients
Solving for the thickness d:
c a
a c2 a c1
c c2a c c1
c c2
1 r I
1 r I 1 r Id ln
1 r II1
I
− − −
= − β α − β
a c a c1
c c c 2a
a
c2
1 r I1
1 r I
I
I
β α − − β − α =
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
S i Wafer with machined areas in the light microscope
c-S i
measurement points :
1: 6 ° 2: 0° 3: 3°
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
Comparison of firs t results : Ga penetration depth by S RIM s imulation
<-> amorphisation thickness by Raman measurements
E nergy: 30 keV
angle of range (S R IM) measured amorphis ation layer
incidence thickness d
0 ° 6.9 (extrapolated) 7.0 nm
3° 7.3 nm 7.5 nm
6° 7.7 nm 7.2 nm
9° 8.2 nm --
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
for use of other beam ions than Ga
•alloy sources and
•an ion column with a mass filter
must be available
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
imaging system
Ion source
condenser
blanking plates
extractor
Wien filter (ExB)
(selection of ionsby mass)
lens
X,Y- deflection plates
specimen
secundary electron detector
precursor gas injector
principle of the
F IB 4400
source
control
blanking
control
scan
generator
amplifier
it includes a mass filter
sys tem dual beam
chamber 4 “s tage eucentric (6 axis )imaging detection of secondary electronsF IB : CANION 31Z
ions Ga, Au, S i, Gemass selection m/∆m=35energy 0 ...30 keVcurrent 1 pA ... 20 nAresolution 10 nm
precursor gases W, F -, Cl-
S E M: L E O 440filament W, Lab6
E DX R öntec
special access to software interfaceproxy writer
Parameters of the F IB4400
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation.. B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
developed source module
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
image taken with an Au Ge S i
beam
Cross over mode
I = 1 nA
B . Köhler, G. Irmer, L . B ishoff, J . T eichert T E M specimen preparation..
S ummary:
• lowering the energy reduces the penetration depth (thinner contamination +amorphisation layer),
• reducing the angle between ion beam and surface to small values hasnegligible effect to the penetration depth
• varying the ion specimen gives an additional free parameter for optimisation (highsputter yield for heavy ions, e.g. Au, small penetration depth)
• working with a S i beam should avoid the contamination problem in S i waferapplications
• an AuGeS i alloy source has been ins talled success fully at the F IB 4400
• in the mixed ion vers ion the alloy source works satis factory
What remains to do / next s teps :
• detailed tes t of the alloy AuGeS i source
• experimental (F IB + Raman) verif ication of the S R IM results