38
The CPC Consolidation Forecast David Unger Dan Collins, Ed O’ Lenic, Huug van den Dool NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Climate Prediction Center

The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The CPC Consolidation Forecast. David Unger Dan Collins, Ed O’ Lenic, Huug van den Dool NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Climate Prediction Center. Overview. A regression procedure designed for ensembles. Derive a relationship between the BEST member of an N-member ensemble and the observation: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

The CPC Consolidation Forecast

David UngerDan Collins, Ed O’ Lenic,

Huug van den Dool

NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Climate Prediction Center

Page 2: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Overview

• A regression procedure designed for ensembles.

Derive a relationship between the BEST member of an N-member ensemble and the observation:

Y = a0 + a1fb + ε

Page 3: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Ensemble Regression

• Weights represent the probability of a given member being the best.

• If weights are known, coefficients can be calculated from the ensemble set.

(No need to explicitly identify the best member)

Page 4: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Ensemble Regression

Page 5: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Example ForecastCFS 1-month Lead Forecast

Nino 3.4 SST, May, 1992April Data June-August Mean SST’s

A series of forecasts

• Start with the ensemble mean• Gradually increase the ensemble spread

K = The fraction of the original model spread

Page 6: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 7: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 8: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 9: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 10: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 11: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 12: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 13: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 14: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 15: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 16: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 17: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 18: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 19: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 20: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 21: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 22: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 23: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 24: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 25: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 26: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 27: The CPC Consolidation Forecast
Page 28: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Multi Model Consolidation

• At least 25 years of “hindcast” data• Standardize each model (means and standard

deviations)• Remove trend from models and observations• Weight the various models• Perform regression• Add trends onto the results

Page 29: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Nino 3.4 Consolidation

• CFS, CCA, CA, MKV

(Statistical and Dynamic models mixed)• Lead -2 and Lead -1 are a mix of observations

and the one and two-month forecast from the CFS

Page 30: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Skill May Initial TimeCalibrated CFS Vs. Consolidation

CRPS Skill Nino 3.4

0

0.5

1

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Lead (Months)

CR

PS

S

CFS

CONS

Page 31: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

U.S. Temperature and Precipitation Consolidation

• CFS• Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)• Screening Multiple Linear

Regression(SMLR)• OCN - Trends.

Page 32: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

SON Consolidation Forecast

Page 33: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Performance

.046 .076 .191 -.147 63%

.067 .076 .162 -.334 59%

.063 .100 .215 -.268 73%

.074 .100 .199 -.203 62%

.023 .040 .098 -.858 38%

CCA+SMLR

CFS

CFS+CCA+SMLR, Wts.

All – Equal Wts.

Official

HSSCRPSS RPSS - 3 % CoverBias (C)

Page 34: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Future Work

• Add more tools and models• Improve weighting method• Trends are too strong• Improve method of mixing statistical and

dynamical tools

Page 35: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

END

Page 36: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Recursive Regression

• Y = a0 + a1fi

a+ = (1-α) a + α Stats(F,Y)

Stats(F,Y) represents error statistic based on the most recent case

α = .05

a+ = .95 a + .05 Stats(F,Y)

Page 37: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

SST Consolidation

• CFS – 42 members (29%)

• Constructed Analog

(CA) – 12 members (18%)

• CCA – 1 member (17%)

• MKV – 1 member (36%)

Page 38: The CPC Consolidation Forecast

Advantages

• Ideally suited for dynamic models.• Uses information from the individual

members (Variable confidence, Clusters in solutions, etc.)

Disadvantages• Statistical forecasts are not true Solutions • Trends are double counted when they

accelerate• Weighting is not optimum (Bayesian seems

appropriate)