Upload
randall-bryan
View
259
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST
Redshift Survey
L.Sun
Outline
Introduction Methodology Results and discussion summary
Introduction : multiple evidence
* Supernovae* CMB + galaxies, clusters or an h0
prior* Late-time integrated Sachs-Wol
fe(ISW) effect
Concordance model : dark energy dominates !
Introduction : dark energy candidates
* Cosmological constant = -1* Dynamical field models
Quintessence model -1 1 Phantom model -1 Quintom model across -1 (Li,Feng&
Zhang,hep-ph/0503268) ……
*... ...
Introduction : cosmological probes
A. Distance measures * Standard candles a. Type Ia supernavae
b. Gamma ray burst * Standard rules a. Baryon oscillation b.SZE+X-ray the scale of clusterB. Structure formation and evolution * Cluster of galaxies count * Weak lensing * ISW effect * Galaxy clustering
Introduction : motivation
Matsubara & szalay (2003) : an application of the Alcock-Paczynski (AP) test to re
dshift-space correlation function of intermidiate-redshift galaxies in SDSS redshift survey can be a useful probe of dark energy.
Introduction : SDSS vs LAMOST
SDSS
LAMOST
0
0.2
0
0.5
(L.Feng et al.,Ch .A&A,24(2000),413)
Number density
Introduction : SDSS vs LAMOST
SDSS
LAMOST
0
0.2
0
0.5
(L.Feng et al.,Ch .A&A,24(2000),413)
Number density
Can LAMOST do a better job?
Analysis of correlation function
* peculiar velocity
(z1,z2,)
z1 z2
Galaxy clustering in redshift space
*AP effect
linear growth factor D(z)
Hubble parameter H(z) and diameter distance dA(z)
What is AP effect ?
Consider a intrinsic spherical object made up of comoving points centered at redshift z, the comoving distances through the center parallel and perpendicular to the line-of-sight direction are given by
AP effect factor
x||
X┴
z z
AP effect in correlation function
Correlation function (z1,z2,) in redshift space
Z1
Z2cos
Z2sin
Formulism
1
23 2
0 0 0 00
1 ( )( ) 1 1 exp 3
1
z
M K Q
zH z H z z dz
z
ln
ln
d Df
d a
2 1 3 3(1 )
ln 2 2 2M
Q M
df wf f
d a
Equation of state parameterization(linder 2003)
Hubble parameter
Linear growth factor
Diameter distance
1/ 2 1/ 2
1/ 2 1/ 2
( ) sinh ( ) ( ) 0
( ) ( ) 0
( ) sin ( ) ( ) 0
A
k k x z K
d z x z K
k k x z K
Analysis of correlation matrix
Place smoothing cells in redshift space
Count the galaxy number ni of each cell
Calculate the redshit-space correlation matrix Cij
We use a Fisher information matrix method to estimate the expected error bounds that LAMOST can give.
In real analysis, we deal with the pixelized galaxy counts ni in a survey sample.
directly associated with (z1,z2,
)
1 11( )
2
C CF Tr C C
Results : samples
York at el., (2000)
LRGs
Main galaxies
Samples : (according to SDSS)
main sample
LRG sample
Results : two cases
Case I : with a distant-observer approximation
Case II : general case
Results : parameters for case I
Survey area is divided into 5 redshift rangescentral redshift : zm= 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5Redshift interval : z=0.1Set a cubic box in each rangecentral redshift : zmbox size : cell number : 1000 (101010 grids)cell radius : R=L/20 (top-hat kernel is used)Fiducial models: bias : b=1,2 for main sample and LRG sample respectivelypower spectrum : a fitting formula by Eisenstein & Hu (1998)Rescale the Fisher matrix : normalized according to the ratio of th
e volume of the box to the total volume
0 1 8( , , , , / , , , )M B M h n (0.3,0.7, 1,0,0.13,0.7,1,1)
1200 zL h Mpc
Locally Euclidean coordinates !
Results : the distant-observer approximation case
Survey area is fixed
Survey volume is fixed
Results : the dominant effect
D(z) H(z)dA(z)
Idealized case I
The growth factor dominates !
Results : the distant-observer approximation case
Low redshift samples High redshift samples
If there is appropriate galaxy sample as tracers up to z~1.5, the equation of state of dark energy can be constrained surprisingly well only by means of the galaxy redshift survey !
Note,normalization is fixed !
Results : parameters for general case
Consider: a realistic LRG sample for LAMOST in redshift range z~0.2-0.4
Set a sub-regionArea: 300 square degree
Cell radius:
Filling way: a cubic closed-packed structure
Cell number: ~1800
Fiducial model: the same as case I
Rescale the fisher matrix: the ratio of the sub-region to the total volume
115R h Mpc
A cone geometry!
Results : general case
(Linder 2003)
The constraints on 1 is improved : mainly by the AP effect
Rotation of the degeneracy direction : to combine the two observations
The expected error bounds of the two parameters 0 and 1 ,1 uncertainty level of one-parameter and joint probability distribution
Results : general case
A promising LRG sample in redshift range z~0.2-0.5 is also considered for LAMOST survey, which with a sub-region filled with ~3500 cells.
Results : limitation
strong priors systematic errors
Summary
The method does have a validity in imposing relatively tight constraint on parameters, and yet the results are contaminated by degeneracy to some extent.
With the average redshift of the samples increasing, the degeneracy direction of parameter constraints involves in a rotation.Thus, the degeneracy between 0 and 1 can be broken in the combination of samples of different redshift ranges.
It is a most hopeful way to combine different cosmological observations to constrain dark energy parameters.
A careful study of the potential origins of systematics and the influence imposed on parameter estimate is main subject we expect to work on in future.
Thank you!