The Mitigation Action Assessment Protocol (MAAP) · PDF fileapplication of the MAAP to 100 low-carbon city activities in Thailand. NCM ACTIVITIES ... • In its current form, the MAAP

The Mitigation Action

Assessment Protocol

(MAAP) tool

REGULATORY

QUANTITY-BASED

INSTRUMENTS

EMISSIONCERTIFICA

TE TRADING

PRICE-BASED INSTRUMENTS

TAXES INCENTIVES

RampD

INFORMATION

AND INNOVATION

SUPPORT

Single

Sector Multi-

Sector

bull Cap and

Trade

bull Offsets

bull Credit and

baseline

bull Clean

Energy

Standard

bull RECs

bull Carbon tax

bull Capital

subsidies

bullFeed-in

Tariffs

bullEnergy

Efficiency

Tariffs

bull Public funding to

labs and universities

bull Research grants

bull Patent policies

bull Labelling

bull GHG

Performance

standards

bull Technology

standards

bull Fuel standards

Single

Sector Multi-

Sector

Countries are designing and implementing a wide

range of heterogeneous climate actions

3

A linked international carbon market is desirable

Governments and market participants need information

about the schemes that they link with and the carbon assets that are

imported

Governments should have the sovereignty to act responsibly on the information about the schemes that

they link with and the carbon assets that are imported

Fundamental assumptions of the Networked Carbon

(NCM) Markets initiative

Linking will not occur and climate

finance will not flow if Governments

market participants and investors lack

information about the schemes that

they link with carbon assets that they

purchase or programs they invest in

Mitigation Action Assessment Protocol (MAAP) bull Developed by DNV GL bull Expert Reviewed by

IISD and New Climate Institute

Mitigation value

PROGRAM LEVEL

Risk relating to the characteristics of a specific program

POLICY LEVEL

Risk relating to the characteristics of a

jurisdictionrsquos collective low-carbon

policies

CONTRIBUTION TO A GLOBAL TARGET


jurisdictionrsquos contribution to

addressing global climate change

Enhancing the transparency and comparability of

programspolicies through the Mitigation Value Assessment

4

Development Process of the MAAP

Stakeholders engagement

bull Carbon Expo May 2013

bull Latin America Carbon Forum (Rio de Janeiro) FICCI (New Delhi) Asian Carbon Forum (Bangkok) ndash Fall 2013

bull GHG verifiers Thailand Feb 2016

Working group - Globally Networked Carbon Markets

bull WB Internal Meeting ndash June 2013

bull Paris Working Group meeting 1 ndash Sept 2013

bull Webinar Update ndash Dec 2013

bull Paris Working Group meeting 2-February 2014

Peer review

bull Comments invited from the Working Group selected individuals and organizations

bull Technical peer reviewrs

2014 - (IdeaCarbon C2B2)

2015- IISD New Climate Institute

Pilots

bull NAMAs - Ecuador Peru

bull Low Carbon City Programs in Phitsanulok and Pakkret - Thailand

bull Energy Efficiency Plan - Ecuador

bull Government of Jaliscorsquos State Climate Plan - Mexico

bull Low Carbon City Programs -Mediterranean region

5

6

Rationale of the MAAP

CERs from

CDM

VERs from

voluntary

schemes

Mitigation

actions

bull NON-BINARY APPROACH bull Quantitative assessment of programsrsquo

risk profile

bull Self-evaluation and benchmarking

bull Assess development benefits in addition

to environmental benefits

bull Users can emphasize modules based on

their priorities

YESNO OUTCOME on

whether the project will

potentially achieve its envisaged

emissions reduction targets or

the actual reported emissions

reductions

Tradable

units from

ETSs

VALIDATION AND

VERIFICATION

MAAP ASSESSMENT

Key modules in the MAAP

7

Mitigation Action Program

Definition amp Scope

Objectives amp Targets

Planning

Roles Responsibilities amp

Authorities

Barriers

Emissions reduction from Intervention

Monitoring and Reporting

Mitigation Action Management Entity

Management Framework

Financial and Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change Programs

Management

Investment Environment

Economic and political

environment

Climate Change Capacity

Development Benefits

Sustainable Development Objectives amp

Targets

Planning amp Participation

Monitoring of Sustainable

Development

Carbon Integrity

MAAP tool

8

bull Implementing jurisdictions can define and apply the criteria of the MAAP most appropriate to their national objectives and context and monitor and compare progress of different mitigation actions

National and sub-national jurisdictions

bull Donors and investors may adjust the MAAP to suit their investment priorities and identify multi-sectoral investment opportunities by using a standardized framework to compare different mitigation actions

Donors and investors

bull Developers may customize the MAAP based on their overarching market strategy and evaluate the mitigation outcome potential of heterogeneous programs at the design and implementation stage

Project developers

bull Carbon market regulators may use the MAAP as a basis for the acceptance of specific carbon assets

Carbon market

regulators

bull Development banks may use the MAAP to prioritize finance and capacity building needs and track progress of their programs and investments

Multilateral Development Banks

Targeted users of the MAAP

9

Benefits of the MAAP A common and widely accepted assessment framework to evaluate the relative performance

of programs with greater transparency would have the following benefits

Offer a lsquochecklistrsquo to provide

guidance and support the

design and implementation of

different mitigation actions

Enhance comparability across

mitigation actions to facilitate

prioritization and benchmarking of

mitigation actions within countries

and between them

Increase confidence to investors

on the viability and level of risk

of different mitigation actions

ensuring environmental

integrity

Provide inputs for decisions related

to linking and trading of mitigation

outcomes

10

THE PROCESS OF SCREENING MITIGATION ACTIONS IN PERU

APPLICATION AS A NAMA SCREENING TOOL

NCM ACTIVITIES

Applying the MAAP to NAMAs in Peru

Shortlisting of 80+ mitigation actions

Customization of MAAP by protocol

developers amp national experts

Ex ante assessment of 10 prioritized

mitigation actions

Selection of 3 mitigation actions for

support under the Partnership for

Market Readiness NAMA Waste

NAMA Cement and Mitigation

Measure of PV distributed generation

bull In December 2015 the MAAP was applied in Peru

to compare and prioritize Nationally Appropriate

Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) for its PMR proposal

bull Mitigation actions chosen NAMA Waste NAMA

Cement and Mitigation Measure of photovoltaic

distributed generation

bull The participatory nature of the assessment proved

useful to identify areas of improvement

bull Next Step Explore possibility of using the

MAAP as one of the mainstays of a future

Mitigation Action Registry in Peru

11

bull In February 2016 the NCM Initiative conducted field visits to

the municipalities of Phitsanulok and Pak Kret to apply the

MAAP to evaluate and compare Low-Carbon Cities (LCC)

programs

bull The MAAP as well as the findings of the field visits were

presented at a multi-stakeholder workshop in Bangkok

organized in collaboration with the Thai Greenhouse Gas

Management Organization (TGO)

bull Next step TGO has expressed interest in scaling up the

application of the MAAP to 100 low-carbon city activities in

Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES

Applying the MAAP to Low Carbon City Programs

in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12

bull In April 2016 NCM and Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) jointly hosted a

multi-stakeholder workshop in Tokyo Participants explored the role of lsquoassessmentsrsquo and

lsquotransparencyrsquo in supporting different carbon market linkages A follow-up scoping study was

conducted by IGES to develop a roadmap for subsequent engagement by the NCM initiative

bull Next step In January 2017 IGES will work with local partners to apply the MAAP to JCM

projects in Mongolia and Vietnam

NCM ACTIVITIES

Applying the MAAP to JCM and CDM Projects

TOKYO

13

Populating MAAP assessments by collaborating

with key expert groups

bull Independent assessment support

bull Integration in new Standards

bull Joint outreach

bull Expert review of the MAAP

Developing the MAAP Online Interface

Provide a user-friendly interface to record data and scores of programsrsquo relative performance

with the ultimate goal of supporting linking capacity building and investment decisions

Support Documents

15

MAAP Design (in progress)

MAAP Implementation

MAAP Assessor Guidelines

(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16

bull Provides guidance on the interpretation of MAAPrsquos key

indicators and means of assessment

Key Indicator Background Means of Assessment

DB11 MA contribution to

sustainable development

This indicator aims to identify if the scope of

the MA includes a contribution to sustainable

development

The most effective way to verify this indicator is

to make a direct reference to the jurisdiction

policy and regulatory framework for sustainable

development and evaluate the alignment with

other jurisdictional priorities in terms of social

development economic benefit or environmental

integrity

DB 12 The MA sustainable

development objectives and

targets

Unlike the previous indicator this indicator

focuses on MAs containing specific

objectives related to sustainable

development where emission reduction is

considered as an additional benefit The aim

of this indicator is to ensure that the action

clearly defines its sustainable development

benefits and sets specific targets and

objectives to track and monitor progress

The user should assess the proposed objectives

and targets in the context of the UNrsquos SDGs A

robust set of objectives and targets will clearly

identify its alignment with one or more of the UN

SDG and the SDG targets its proposed to

contribute to It is desirable for the MArsquos

contribution to go beyond SDG 13 (climate

action)

Example

Conclusion and next steps

17

bull The MAAP aims to provide a standardised framework to quantitatively

assess the carbon integrity and development benefits of a wide range

of programs with mitigation outcome

bull In its current form the MAAP has three key purposes

bull Enable self-evaluation to support the design and implementation of

programs with mitigation outcome

bull Enhance the credit and finance-readiness of programs

bull Inform Governments and Development Banksrsquo capacity building and

investment decisions

bull Next steps

bull Scale up the application of MAAP to 1000 projectsprograms

bull Launch the MAAP online interface in May 2017

bull Finalize the MAAP-Design and MAAP Assessor Guidelines

INTRODUCT ION TO THE MAAP

TOOL

MAAP Tool Structure to obtain Mitigation Value

Key indicator score = Key Indicator weight x score

Assessment area score = Σ (Area weight x Key Indicator score)

Module score = Σ (Area score)

Mitigation Action

Program

Definition amp scope


Planning

Roles Responsibilities

amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers

Emissions reductions

from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and

political environment

Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()

Default or custom weight based on the priorities of the jurisdictionschemeprogram

Higher impact on the

overall project mitigation

Higher relevance

Higher weight allocated

Step 1 Select Weights for 16 Areas

Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance


Step 2 Select Weight for 69 Key Indicator

Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()

Default or custom weight based on the

priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated

Stronger design or more

robust implementation

More likely to deliver its

stated objectives

Higher score assigned

to the key indicator

Default or custom score Default score midpoint of

range low (0‐40) medium

(40‐60) high (60‐100)

Step 3 Assign Score to each Key Indicator

Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance


Final Output of MAAP Mitigation Values

MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles

Responsibilitieshellip

MP5 Documents

document controlhellip

MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions

reductions fromhellip

MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055

1 Mitigation Action Program

2Management Entity

3 Investment Environment

4 Development Benefits

Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6

Scope of the Mitigation Action and

its contributions to Sustainablehellip

Alignment with Jurisdictional

priorities

Mitigation Action approval by

relevant authorities

Starting date milestones and

duration of the program

Boundaries for the Program in

terms of a geographical area ofhellip

MODULE 1 Mitigation Action Program

Sample Area Definition and scope

Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip

Key Indicator Score Obtained

Result by Key Indicator Result by Area (Sample)

Result by Module

The MAAP is not intended to

give a global score to the MA

Each area score can be

compared to the Max possible score (best)

EXAMPLE PILOT IN PERU

24

Module Rating Area Weight Key

Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program

Definition amp Scope 14 5

Objectives amp Targets 20 4

Planning 22 7

Roles Responsibilities amp Authorities 7 5

Barriers 7 1

Emissions Reductions from Interventions 20 7

Monitoring amp Reporting 10 3

2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity

Management Framework 30 2

Financial amp Investment Capacity Framework 33 3

Climate Change Program Management 37 3

3 Investment

Environment

Internationally Recognized Country Ratings 45 4

Climate change infrastructure program level 55 4

4 Development

Benefits

Sustainable Dev Objectives amp Targets 35 7

Planning and Participation 45 8

Monitoring of Sustainable Development 20 6

Structure of the MAAP

0

5

10

15

20

25DEFINITION amp SCOPE

OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES

RESPONSIBILITIES AND

AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS

EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS

FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING

Mitigation Action Program Module

max score

score

25

EXAMPLE MODULE ndash EVALUATION AREAS


MODULE 3 Investment Environment

Possible use by International investors or credits buyers when selecting countries to invest in or buy credits from

Module Area Default

Weight Key Indicator

Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045

Sustainability-Adjusted Global

Competitiveness Index (GCI) from the

World Economic Forum

Corruption Perception Index

Jurisdiction Economic index

Human development Index

Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055

Climate change authorities and their

responsibilities affecting the Mitigation

Action Program

National Mitigation Action Registry and

authorities towards UNFCCC Mitigation

Action Registry (If applicable)

Registry and double counting

Transparency on climate financial support

received

Module 3 may not be applied to the project level because it treats country level policy

Addressed in Module 3

Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity

Module Area Key Indicator Default

Weight

Planning

Portfolio of interventions for the Mitigation

Action implementation 015

Planning of individual Mitigation Action

interventions 015

Mitigation Actionrsquos Interventions development

process 010


from interventions

Mitigation Action interventions boundaries and

GHG effects 015

The Mitigation Action mechanism to ensure

permanence 015

Climate change

programs management

Climate Change related responsibilities and

authorities 020

Possible use by

Jurisdictions institutional investors carbon market regulators when applying the MAAP to a scheme (and schemes) or a governing institution

Some indicators may not be applied to the project level because it treats country level policy

How to assign weighting and scoring

bull Default or custom weight

bull Default lsquoscore rangersquo or custom lsquosingle scorersquo

What are the ways to assign score

Weighting

Different weight may apply due to

bull Priorities of user

bull Objectives and mandate of the scheme

bull Tradability of credits

bull Requirements of the scheme

bull Financial support scheme

bull Etc

Follow IGES Climate on Twitter for climate news

publications and events

Weighting for JCM and CDM projects

Module Area Default Weight

Proposed weight (JCM)

Proposed weight (CDM)

Key Indicator Default Weight



Definition and scope of the

Mitigation Action

014 010 010

Scope of the Mitigation Action and its contributions to Sustainable Development

015 020 015

Alignment with Jurisdictional priorities

020 020 015

Mitigation Action approval by relevant authorities

025 020 030

Starting date milestones and duration of the Program

010 020 025

Boundaries for the Program in terms of a geographical area of implementation

030 020 015

Total 10 10 10

Objectives and targets

020 015 015

Definition planning and review of Mitigation Action program objectives and targets

020 040 040

Mitigation Action objectives related to i) reduce GHG emissions ii) contribution to Sustainable Development

030 020 020

Alignment of the Mitigation Action objectives and the jurisdictional priorities on Climate Change

030 015 010

Mitigation Action targets 020 025 030 Total 1 1 1








Planning 022 015 015

Mitigation Action planning to achieve established targets

010 017 017

Risk analysis for implementation risk management and mitigation plan

020 017 018

The Mitigation Action investment planning

010 022 025

Mitigation Action compliance with regulatory requirements

015 022 020

Process for the involvement of local stakeholders in the development of Policies and Projects under the Program including a public comment period

015 022 020

Total 1 1 1

Roles Responsibiliti

es And Authorities

003 010 010

Resources available for implementation

035 060 060

Definition of roles responsibilities and level of authority for Mitigation Action design and implementation

065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010

Mitigation Action operational and management documented system

035 020 020

The Mitigation Action Program design documentation

020 035 035

The program provisions for tracking emissions reduction transactions

045 045 045

Total 1 1 1

Barriers 007 005 005

Identification of barriers for implementation

100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020

Inclusion criteria (if applicable) 015 035 025

GHG estimation and calculation methodologies

020 025 025

The Mitigation Action baseline scenario estimation and calculation methodologies

010 025 030

Mitigation Action uncertainty approach and methodologies

015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030

Responsibilities and authorities within the Program management entity (PME)

040 040 040

The PME Management System 060 060 060

Total 1 1 1

Financial and investment

033 040 040

The PME methodologies to reporting and transparency of financial flows received and used to date including actual disbursement etc

025 040 040

Past experience in the management and implementation of internationally financed programs

040 035 035

International or national rating of the PME (if available)

035 025 025

Total 1 1 1

Climate change programs

management

037 030 030

Climate Change related responsibilities and authorities

020 020 020

Management Structure and capacity including interinstitutional or sectorial coordinating capabilities

050 050 050

The Mitigation Action Managing Entity technical capability

030 030 030

Total 1 1 1 Total 1 1 1








Development Objectives

and ta1rgets

035 035 035

Mitigation Action contribution to sustainable development

010 010 010

The Mitigation Action sustainable development objectives and targets

015 010 010

Mitigation Actions evaluation of environmental impacts including trans-boundary impacts

020 020 020

Mitigation Action non GHG related environmental benefits (if applicable)

015 030 030

The Mitigation Action consideration of Social responsibility principles

025 010 010

The Mitigation Action economic benefits of its implementation

015 020 020

Total 1 1 1

Weighting for JCM and CDM projects Module Area

Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045

The Mitigation Action must guarantee to be exempt of negative environmentalsocialeconomic impacts

015 020 020

Mitigation Action planning process for development benefits goals achievement

010 010 010

Responsibilities and authorities 015 015 015 The Mitigation Action Program includes the participation of the interested parties

010 010 010

Participation mechanisms established 020 020 020

Capacity and motivation strengthened within civil society as well as among government and private sector for holistic and integrated natural resources management approach

007 010 010

Strategic partnerships coalitions and alliances established to effectively engage in policy decision making and monitoring and evaluation processes

013 005 005

Stakeholders engagement in the development of the institutional character of resources policy development design monitoring and evaluation

010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of

development benefits

020 020 020

The Mitigation Action specifies development indicators according to its scope boundaries and sector involved

010 020 020

Mitigation Action contribution to Life Conditions Improvements and public welfare

028 013 013

The Mitigation Action contribution to strengthening public policy institutional growth and capacity building of the actorsstakeholders involved

015 015 015

Accountability 010 010 010

Consideration of possible negative impacts of the Mitigation Action

022 022 022

Flexibility 015 020 020

Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40

MAAP review by IISD amp NewClimate Institute

Scorecard categories

Risk Categories Weights Number of

Indicators Explanation

Characterization Risks 10 4 Risks related to the general characteristics

of the MA

Governance and Management Risks 20 12

Risks related to the governance and

management of the MA that impact the

GHG estimate and MR activities

GHG Assessment Boundary Risks 20 6

Risks related to the mapping of GHG

effects and the identification of sources and

sinks

GHG Estimation Risks 20 13

Risks related to the baseline methodology

and baseline data The estimation of the

emission reduction ex-ante is not covered

as it is not relevant for assessing carbon

integrity risks

GHG Monitoring Risks 20 7

Risks related to monitoring the emissions

and removals from all the relevant sources

and sinks

Reporting Risks 10 3 Risks related to the quality and frequency

of reporting

41


Completeness checklist

RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS

MA Design Elements Completeness Checklist

Concept

Planning

Designation and mandate of Lead Implementing Entity as well as supporting entities

Concept note that outlines

o MA objective

o Key interventions proposed that lead to expected GHG emissions reductions and co-benefits

o The sectoral temporal and geographical scope of the MA

o The baseline definition from which to establish a target or measure progress

o An organizational structure for MA development that outlines institutional technical and supporting roles

(eg inter-ministerial cooperation)

Detailed planning of MA including

o Defining a policy framework that specifies the design of specific interventions (eg regulations

economic incentives disseminating information etc)

o Responsibilities of different actors in monitoring and reporting emissions and removals

o Timeline for activities

o Expected MA impacts

Financing Plan and budget

Monitoring and reporting plan and identification of relevant stakeholders responsible for monitoring and

reporting

Implementation Measurement systems in place to collect and record data to assess performance indicators

Publication of monitoring reports that estimate emission reductionsremovals and other performance indicators

Closure Final assessment of MA emissions reductions

REGULATORY

QUANTITY-BASED

INSTRUMENTS

EMISSIONCERTIFICA

TE TRADING

PRICE-BASED INSTRUMENTS

TAXES INCENTIVES

RampD

INFORMATION

AND INNOVATION

SUPPORT

Single

Sector Multi-

Sector

bull Cap and

Trade

bull Offsets

bull Credit and

baseline

bull Clean

Energy

Standard

bull RECs

bull Carbon tax

bull Capital

subsidies

bullFeed-in

Tariffs

bullEnergy

Efficiency

Tariffs

bull Public funding to

labs and universities

bull Research grants

bull Patent policies

bull Labelling

bull GHG

Performance

standards

bull Technology

standards

bull Fuel standards

Single

Sector Multi-

Sector

Countries are designing and implementing a wide

range of heterogeneous climate actions

3




imported













Mitigation value

PROGRAM LEVEL


POLICY LEVEL



policies







4











Peer review





Pilots






5

6


CERs from

CDM

VERs from

voluntary

schemes

Mitigation

actions


risk profile





their priorities

YESNO OUTCOME on





reductions

Tradable

units from

ETSs

VALIDATION AND

VERIFICATION

MAAP ASSESSMENT


7




Planning


Authorities

Barriers






Framework


Management



environment




Targets



Development

Carbon Integrity

MAAP tool

8






Project developers


Carbon market

regulators




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




3




imported













Mitigation value

PROGRAM LEVEL


POLICY LEVEL



policies







4











Peer review





Pilots






5

6


CERs from

CDM

VERs from

voluntary

schemes

Mitigation

actions


risk profile





their priorities

YESNO OUTCOME on





reductions

Tradable

units from

ETSs

VALIDATION AND

VERIFICATION

MAAP ASSESSMENT


7




Planning


Authorities

Barriers






Framework


Management



environment




Targets



Development

Carbon Integrity

MAAP tool

8






Project developers


Carbon market

regulators




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting






Mitigation value

PROGRAM LEVEL


POLICY LEVEL



policies







4











Peer review





Pilots






5

6


CERs from

CDM

VERs from

voluntary

schemes

Mitigation

actions


risk profile





their priorities

YESNO OUTCOME on





reductions

Tradable

units from

ETSs

VALIDATION AND

VERIFICATION

MAAP ASSESSMENT


7




Planning


Authorities

Barriers






Framework


Management



environment




Targets



Development

Carbon Integrity

MAAP tool

8






Project developers


Carbon market

regulators




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting














Peer review





Pilots






5

6


CERs from

CDM

VERs from

voluntary

schemes

Mitigation

actions


risk profile





their priorities

YESNO OUTCOME on





reductions

Tradable

units from

ETSs

VALIDATION AND

VERIFICATION

MAAP ASSESSMENT


7




Planning


Authorities

Barriers






Framework


Management



environment




Targets



Development

Carbon Integrity

MAAP tool

8






Project developers


Carbon market

regulators




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




6


CERs from

CDM

VERs from

voluntary

schemes

Mitigation

actions


risk profile





their priorities

YESNO OUTCOME on





reductions

Tradable

units from

ETSs

VALIDATION AND

VERIFICATION

MAAP ASSESSMENT


7




Planning


Authorities

Barriers






Framework


Management



environment




Targets



Development

Carbon Integrity

MAAP tool

8






Project developers


Carbon market

regulators




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





7




Planning


Authorities

Barriers






Framework


Management



environment




Targets



Development

Carbon Integrity

MAAP tool

8






Project developers


Carbon market

regulators




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




8






Project developers


Carbon market

regulators




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




9











and between them





integrity



outcomes

10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




10



NCM ACTIVITIES






mitigation actions

















11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




11




programs







Thailand

NCM ACTIVITIES


in Thailand

PHITSANULOK

PAK KRET

BANGKOK

12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




12







NCM ACTIVITIES


TOKYO

13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




13





bull Joint outreach





Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting







Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




Support Documents

15


MAAP Implementation


(in progress)

The Mitigation

Action Assesment

Protocol

May 2016


16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





16








development







integrity



targets

















action)

Example


17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





17










bull Next steps





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





TOOL





Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting








Mitigation Action

Program



Planning


amp Authorities

Documents document

control and records

Barriers


from Interventions

Monitoring and

Reporting

Mitigation Action

Management

Entity

Management

Framework

Financial and

Investment Capacity

Framework

Climate Change

Programs

Management

Investment

Environment

Economic and


Climate change

capacity

Development

Benefits

Sustainable

Development


Planning amp

Participation

Monitoring of


Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




Area Weight ()




Higher relevance



Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




Area Weight ()




Higher relevance


Key Indicator

Weight ()




Higher relevance



Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




Key Indicator

Score

(0-100)

Key Indicator

Weight ()


priorities



Higher relevance

Higher weight

allocated




stated objectives





(40‐60) high (60‐100)


Area Weight

()


priorities



Higher relevance



MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





MP1 Definition and

scope of thehellip

MP2 Objectives and

targets

MP3 Planning

MP4 Roles


MP5 Documents


MP6 Barriers

MP7 Emissions


MP8 Monitoring and

reporting

SAMPLE MODULE 1

Max Area Score

Area Score

825625

498

0

69055


2Management Entity



Score

20

30

20

20

10

16

15

18

15

6




priorities









Key Indicator

Max expectedhellip



Result by Module






24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





24


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

25





Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting






Module Area Default


Internationally

Recognized

Jurisdiction

Ratings

045







Climate change

infrastructure at

the program level

055



Action Program






received



Management Entity


Mitigation Action

Program


Management Entity


Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





Weight

Planning




interventions 015


process 010


from interventions


GHG effects 015


permanence 015

Climate change

programs management


authorities 020

Possible use by







Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting








Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




Weighting







bull Etc











Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting














Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting












Mitigation Action

014 010 010


015 020 015


020 020 015


025 020 030


010 020 025


030 020 015

Total 10 10 10


020 015 015


020 040 040


030 020 020


030 015 010











010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting













010 017 017


020 017 018


010 022 025


015 022 020


015 022 020

Total 1 1 1


es And Authorities

003 010 010


035 060 060


065 040 040

Total 1 1 1








Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting











Documents document

control and records

004 010 010


035 020 020


020 035 035


045 045 045

Total 1 1 1



100 100 100

Total 1 1 1


from interventions

020 020 020



020 025 025


010 025 030


015 015 020

Total 1 1 1









030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting












030 030 030


040 040 040


Total 1 1 1


033 040 040


025 040 040


040 035 035


035 025 025

Total 1 1 1


management

037 030 030


020 020 020


050 050 050


030 030 030










and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting












and ta1rgets

035 035 035


010 010 010


015 010 010


020 020 020


015 030 030


025 010 010


015 020 020

Total 1 1 1


Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





Default Weight






Planning and

participation

045 045 045


015 020 020


010 010 010


010 010 010



007 010 010


013 005 005


010 010 010

Total 1 1 1

Monitoring of


020 020 020


010 020 020


028 013 013


015 015 015



022 022 022


Total 1 1 1

37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




37

ANNEX


38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting





38


Indicators

1 Mitigation Action

Program



Planning 22 7


Barriers 7 1



2 Mitigation Action

Management Entity




3 Investment

Environment



4 Development

Benefits





0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




0

5

10

15

20


OBJECTIVES AND

TARGETS

PLANNING

ROLES


AUTHORITIES

BARRIERS


FROM INTERVENTIONS

MONITORING AND

REPORTING


max score

score

39



40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




40






of the MA








sinks






integrity risks




and sinks


of reporting

41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting




41



RE

VI

EW

P

RO

CE

SS


Concept

Planning



o MA objective














reporting


