Upload
gannon-avila
View
27
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ming Shao CPST/USTC with Zhangbu Xu, Zebo Tang, Li Yi, Lijuan ruan, and more. Tsallis Fit to RHIC Data. Introduction & Motivation Why and how to implement Tsallis statistics in Blast-Wave framework Results Flavor dependence High pT Conclusion. Thermalization and Radial flow in HI. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1
Tsallis Fit to RHIC DataMing ShaoCPST/USTC
with Zhangbu Xu, Zebo Tang, Li Yi, Lijuan ruan, and more
Introduction & Motivation Why and how to implement Tsallis statistics in Blast-Wave framework Results
− Flavor dependence− High pT
Conclusion
23/4/19
2010/10/18 14 届全国核物理大会,合肥 2
Thermalization and Radial flow in HI
Thermalization in heavy-ion collisions ?- particle ratios agree with thermal prediction
Matter flows in heavy-ion collisions – all particles have the same collective velocity
2
T T
eff fo T
p mass
T T mass
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 182301 STAR whitepaper
2010/10/18 14 届全国核物理大会,合肥 3
Multi-strange decouple earlier than light hadrons, with less radial flow velocity
Blast-wave analysis
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 423/4/19 4
Hydrodynamics evolution
π, K, p Multi-strange
Multi-strange particle spectra can be well described by the same hydrodynamics parameters as light hadronsin contrast to the Blast-wave results
Ulrich Heinz, arXiv:0901.4355
Hydro parameters:0 = 0.6 fm/c s0 = 110 fm-3 s0/n0 = 250 Tcrit=Tchem=165 MeV Tdec=100 MeV
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 523/4/19 5
Blast-Wave Model
Assumptions:– Local thermal equilibrium Boltzmann distribution– Longitudinal and transverse expansions (1+2)
– Temperature and T are global quantities
random
boostedE.Schnedermann, J.Sollfrank, and U.Heinz, Phys. Rev. C48, 2462(1993)
Ed3N
dp3 e (u p )/T fo p
d
dN
mTdmT rdrmTK1
mT coshTfo
0
R I0pT sinhTfo
tanh 1r r Sr
R
0.5,1,2
Extract thermal temperature Tfo and velocity parameter T
BGBW: Boltzmann-Gibbs Blast-Wave
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 623/4/19 6
Limitation of the Blast-wave
• Strong assumption on local thermal equilibrium
• Arbitrary choice of pT range of the spectra
• Non-zero flow velocity <T>=0.2 in p+p
• Lack of non-extensive quantities to describe the evolution from p+p to central A+A collisions
– mT spectra in p+p collisions
Levy function or mT power-law
– mT spectra in A+A collisions
Boltzmann or mT exponential
pp@200GeV minbias
STAR PRC71 (2005) 64902
AuAu@200GeV
STAR PRL99
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 723/4/19
Non-extensive Tsallis statistics
C. Tsallis, H. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988)Wilk and Wlodarzcyk, PRL84, 2770
(2000) ; Wilk and Wlodarzcyk,
EPJ40, 299 (2009)
)1/(1])1(
1[)(exp
)exp(
qTTq
T
T
mq
T
mT
mParticle pT spectra:
Exponential Power law
1/1
/1/12
22
qT
TT
Tsallis Entropy
Why Tsallis statistics?
Memory effect
Long range correlation (small size)
Intrinsic fluctuation
Limited phase space
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 823/4/19
Tsallis statistics in Blast-wave model
)1/(1])1(
1[)(exp)exp( qTT
qT
T
mq
T
m
T
m
3
3
1 00
1
2
0 1
0 0
cosh sinh
tanh 0.5,1,2
1( ) exp[ cos( )] , ( ) cosh( )exp[ cosh( )]
2
fo(u p )/T
RT T
TT T fo fo
r r S
d NE e pddp
m pdNrdrm K I
m dm T T
r
R
I z z d K z y z y dy
BGBW:
With Tsallis distribution:
Tsallis Blast-wave (TBW) equation is:
R
qTT
Y
Y
TTT
pymT
qrdrddyym
dmm
dN
0
)1/(1)]}cos()sinh()cosh()cosh([1
1{)cosh(
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 923/4/19 9
Fit results in Au+Au collisionsZBT,Yichun Xu, Lijuan Ruan, Gene van Buren, Fuqiang Wang and Zhangbu Xu, Phys. Rev. C 79, 051901 (R) (2009)
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1010
Results in p+p collisions
23/4/19
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1123/4/19 11
Fit strange hadrons only
Strangeness, Au+Au 0-10%:<> = 0.464 +- 0.006 T = 0.150 +- 0.005 q = 1.000 +- 0.002chi^2/nDof = 51/99
Tstrange>Tlight-hadrons
Strangness decouple from the system earlier
All available species
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1223/4/19 12
Centrality dependence for T and <
Multi-strange hadrons decouple earlier Hadron rescattering at hadronic phase doesn’t produce a collective radial flow, instead, it drives the system off equilibrium Partons achieve thermal equilibrium in central collisions
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1323/4/19 13
J/ suppression at RHIC and SPS
Grandchamp, Rapp, BrownPRL 92, 212301 (2004) nucl-ex/0611020
Regeneration?Test with J/ flow.
quarkonium – gloden probe of QGP• deconfinement (color screening)• thermometer
J/ suppression at RHIC ≈J/ suppression at SPS(energy differs by ~10 times)
Puzzle!
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1423/4/19 14
J/ radial flow
J/ radial flow consistent with 0, inconsistent with regeneration
AuAu: β=0, T=0.2+/-0.4, q-1=0.06+/-0.18CuCu: β=0, T=0.0+/-0.4, q-1=1.113+/-0.006pp: β=0, T=0.17+/-0.17, q-1=1.07+/-0.05
Tsallis fit to high-pT
1523/4/19 STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011
core
corona (pp)
RAA & v2
23/4/19 STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 16
1) New extension to v2 still provide high quality fits – indicating bulk as a thermodynamic state. 2) Non-equilibrated component in the core produces a power-law tail in spectra and high v2 at the intermediate pT. 3) The baryon and meson yields are grouped in p+p.4) 2)+3) together bring down the bulk v2, produce the baryon enhancement and the NCQ scaling at the intermediate pT. 5) The medium quenches the jet (to fpp = 0.40), resulting in a finite v2 emission (9.4%).6) Data points at low pT dominates the fit 2.
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1723/4/19 17
Summary
• Identified particle spectra at RHIC have been analyzed with Tsallis statistics in Blast-wave description to high pT
(light hadrons, multi-strange hadrons, charmonium)• Partonic phase
– Partons achieve thermal equilibrium in central heavy-ion collisions– J/ is not thermalized and disfavors regeneration
• Hadronic phase– Multi-strange hadrons decouple earlier – Hadronic rescattering doesn’t produce collective radial flow, but
drives the system off equilibrium– Radial flow reflects that when the multi-strange decouples
• Unified macroscopic description of hadron spectra/flow to high pT– Core and corona component
– Statistical originated NCQ scaling on RAA & v2
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 1823/4/19 18
Thank you!
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 19
Check— Parameter Correlation
23/4/19 19
<> = 0.0000 +- 0.0000T = 0.1747 +- 0.1644q = 1.0708 +- 0.04352/nDof = 12.83 / 13
<> = 0.0954 +- 0.0828T = 0.1777 +- 0.0328q = 1.0106 +- 0.00222/nDof = 151.53 / 37
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 20
Check—Strangeness and light hadrons
23/4/19 20
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 211/14/2010 21
Temperature fluctuation
1/1
/1/12
22
qT
TT
Wilk and Wlodarzcyk, EPJ40, 299 (2009)Wilk and Wlodarzcyk, PRL84, 2770 (2000)
Reverse legend
23/4/19
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 2223/4/19 22
J/Elliptic flow
Heavy Flavor decay electron
Too early to compare with modelsWon’t have enough statistics before 2011
J/
Ermias T. Atomssa, QM2009
Alan Dion, QM2009
PHENIX Beam Use Request
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 2323/4/19 23
How about radial flow?
Yifei Zhang, QM2008, STAR, arXiv:0805.0364 (submitted to PRL)
Sizeable radial flow for heavy flavor decay electrons
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 24
Beam energy dependence
23/4/19 24
GeVs 2.17
1. The radial flow velocity at SPS is smaller than that at RHIC.2. Freeze-out temperatures are similar at RHIC and SPS.3. The non-equilibrium parameter (q-1) is small in central nucleus-nucleus
collisions at RHIC and SPS except a larger (q -1) value for non-strange hadrons at RHIC energy
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, 2011 2523/4/19 25
J/ radial flow
<> = 0.06 +- 0.03 T = 0.134 +- 0.006 q =1.0250 +- 0.0014 2/nDof = 85.03 / 26