1
abcde Saturday, May 16, 2015 VOL. 287, NO. 136 * Suggested retail price $1.50 $2.00 outside Metro Boston SENTENCED TO DEATH Tsarnaev gets ultimate penalty for placing Marathon bomb By Milton J. Valencia GLOBE STAFF The federal jury that watched Dzhokhar Tsarnaev sit impassively in court for the past three months deliv- ered the severest form of justice Fri- day, sentencing the homegrown ter- rorist to death for detonating a bomb amid Boston Marathon spectators that left wounds — emotional and physical — that will persist across life- times. Tsarnaev again stood stonefaced as the verdict was read by a court clerk and some stern-faced jurors dabbed their eyes. He becomes the first terrorist condemned to death by a jury in the United States in the post-9/11 world. The unanimous verdict brought to a close a legal drama that has unfold- ed on the South Boston waterfront since January, with searing testimony about the bombings that killed three, took the limbs of 17 others, and in- jured hundreds more. Throughout the proceedings, the lanky 21-year- old showed no remorse. The death sentence automatically sets in motion an appeals process that could last more than a decade. “Our thoughts should now turn away from the Tsarnaev brothers for good,” US Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz TSARNAEV, Page A6 M oments after the jury’s sentence was announced, as it be- came clear that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was bound for federal death row in Terre Haute, Ind., I turned to my left. In the second row on the far side of Courtroom 9, Bill and Denise Richard leaned forward, dry-eyed. Two rows in back of them, Liz Nor- den wiped tears from her eyes. The Richards opposed the death penalty for the man who murdered their 8-year-old son, saying it would lead to an endless cycle of appeals, keeping Tsarnaev in our collective consciousness forever. Liz Norden, whose sons JP and Paul lost their legs on Boylston Street, believed Tsarnaev deserved to die for what he did. Their reactions might not have been expected by most, but trying to predict reactions in the abstract is meaningless. So, too, was the wide- spread belief that a jury in Massa- chusetts would never sentence any- one to death, even someone as cruel and remorseless as Dzhokhar Tsar- CULLEN, Page A8 Shows no emotion; appeals may last decade WHEN IS THE FORMAL SENTENCING? US District Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. must officially impose the death penalty, and he will do that in a sentencing hearing at a later date. The jury’s decision is le- gally binding. At the hearing, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s victims will have an opportunity to confront him. Tsarnaev, if he chooses, could address the court. WHERE WILL TSARNAEV EVENTUALLY GO? Because he was sentenced to death, he will probably be taken to the federal prison at Terre Haute, Ind., where the Bureau of Prisons holds inmates on death row. WILL HE APPEAL? Tsarnaev will probably engage in a lengthy appeals process that could take more than a decade. He will probably focus on several of the judge’s decisions, including the re- fusal to relocate the trial. More on what's next, A7. What will happen next After what jurors saw, no simple choice Kevin Cullen COMMENTARY JANE FLAVELL COLLINS Use of a weapon of mass destruction (pres- sure cooker bomb #2) in the vicinity of 755 Boylston St., and aiding and abetting, result- ing in the deaths of Lingzi Lu and Martin Richard. Possession or use of a firearm (pressure cooker bomb #2) during and in relation to a crime of violence, namely, use of a weapon of mass destruction, and aiding and abetting, resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard. Bombing of a place of public use (pressure cooker bomb #2) in the vicinity of 755 Boyl- ston St., and aiding and abetting, resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard. Possession or use of a firearm (pressure cooker bomb #2) during and in relation to a crime of violence, namely, the bombing of a place of public use, and aiding and abetting, resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard. Malicious destruction of property by means of an explosive (pressure cooker bomb #2), and aiding and abetting, resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard. Possession or use of a firearm (pressure cooker bomb #2) during and in relation to a crime of violence, and aiding and abetting, resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard. DEATH PENALTY FOR 6 OF THE 17 COUNTS 9 10 14 15 By Patricia Wen GLOBE STAFF The 24-page verdict form com- pleted by jurors Friday in the death-penalty trial of Boston Mara- thon bomber Dzhokhar Tsar- naev sent one clear message: The de- fense team’s narrative about why this lanky, expressionless defen- dant deserved a measure of sympa- thy did not ring true. During deliberations over 14½ hours, the jury rejected each of four key aspects of the defense case. The panel did not agree that Tsarnaev came under the domination of an older brother, that he was largely neglected by troubled parents, and that the toughest high-security prison in America would prevent him from achieving future fame. And in what may have been piv- otal in the jury’s decision, the panel also rejected the defense conten- tion that the 21-year-old Cam- bridge high school graduate was re- morseful. Tsarnaev showed little emotion throughout the trial, even when some victims with prosthetic legs testified about multiple surger- ies they have endured, or BB’s still lodged in their bodies. “His lack of remorse sealed his fate,” said George Vien, a former veteran federal prosecutor in Bos- ton with death-penalty expertise. No jurors were available for comment in the courthouse after the verdict was read, and their identities have so far been kept confidential by the court. But the jury’s reasoning can be potentially gleaned from the ver- dict form, which shows how mem- bers voted on dozens of “aggravat- ANALYSIS, Page A8 Defense unable to generate sympathy for a terrorist By David Abel and John R. Ellement GLOBE STAFF There was deep relief, and there was angst. A federal jury’s dramatic decision Friday to sentence Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to death sparked mixed feelings among the survivors, emergency personnel, and others who experienced the horror unleashed when two homemade pressure-cooker bombs detonated near the finish line of the world-re- nowned race on April 15, 2013. Sydney Corcoran was seriously injured in the blasts, along with her mother, Celeste, who lost both legs. After the verdict, Sydney turned to social media. “My mother and I think that NOW he will go away and we will be able to move on. Justice,’’ Sydney Corcoran wrote on her Twitter ac- count. “In his own words, ‘an eye for an eye.’ ” Heather Abbott, who lost her left leg below the knee after the second bomb exploded on Boylston Street, FAMILIES, Page A7 Sense of relief for some survivors, but little peace JOHN TLUMACKI/GLOBE STAFF Kevin Corcoran, his daughter Sydney (left), seriously injured in the attack, and his wife, Celeste, who lost both legs, embraced after the verdict. The four killed by the Tsarnaevs (from top): Lingzi Lu, Martin Richard, Krystle Campbell, and Sean Collier. NEWS ANALYSIS 4 5

Tsarnaev death

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tsarnaev death

abcdeS a t u r d a y , M a y 1 6 , 2 0 1 5

V O L .  2 8 7 ,  N O .  1 3 6

*Suggested retail price

$1.50$2.00 outside Metro Boston

SENTENCEDTO DEATH

Tsarnaev gets ultimate penalty for placing Marathon bomb

By Milton J. ValenciaGLOBE STAFF

The federal jury that watchedDzhokhar Tsarnaev sit impassively incourt for the past three months deliv­ered the severest form of justice Fri­day, sentencing the homegrown ter­rorist to death for detonating a bombamid Boston Marathon spectatorsthat left wounds — emotional andphysical — that will persist across life­times.

Tsarnaev again stood stonefacedas the verdict was read by a courtclerk and some stern­faced jurorsdabbed their eyes. He becomes thefirst terrorist condemned to death bya jury in the United States in thepost­9/11 world.

The unanimous verdict brought toa close a legal drama that has unfold­ed on the South Boston waterfrontsince January, with searing testimonyabout the bombings that killed three,took the limbs of 17 others, and in­jured hundreds more. Throughoutthe proceedings, the lanky 21­year­old showed no remorse.

The death sentence automaticallysets in motion an appeals process thatcould last more than a decade.

“Our thoughts should now turnaway from the Tsarnaev brothers forgood,” US Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz

TSARNAEV, Page A6

Moments after thejury’s sentence wasannounced, as it be­came clear thatDzhokhar Tsarnaev

was bound for federal death row inTerre Haute, Ind., I turned to my left.

In the second row on the far sideof Courtroom 9, Bill and DeniseRichard leaned forward, dry­eyed.Two rows in back of them, Liz Nor­den wiped tears from her eyes.

The Richards opposed the deathpenalty for the man who murderedtheir 8­year­old son, saying it wouldlead to an endless cycle of appeals,keeping Tsarnaev in our collectiveconsciousness forever. Liz Norden,whose sons JP and Paul lost theirlegs on Boylston Street, believedTsarnaev deserved to die for what hedid.

Their reactions might not havebeen expected by most, but trying topredict reactions in the abstract ismeaningless. So, too, was the wide­spread belief that a jury in Massa­chusetts would never sentence any­one to death, even someone as crueland remorseless as Dzhokhar Tsar­

CULLEN, Page A8

Shows noemotion;appeals maylast decade

WHEN IS THE FORMALSENTENCING?US District Judge George A.O’Toole Jr. must officially imposethe death penalty, and he will dothat in a sentencing hearing at alater date. The jury’s decision is le­gally binding. At the hearing,Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s victims willhave an opportunity to confronthim. Tsarnaev, if he chooses, couldaddress the court.

WHERE WILL TSARNAEVEVENTUALLY GO?Because he was sentenced to death,he will probably be taken to thefederal prison at Terre Haute, Ind.,where the Bureau of Prisons holdsinmates on death row.

WILL HE APPEAL?Tsarnaev will probably engage in alengthy appeals process that couldtake more than a decade. He willprobably focus on several of thejudge’s decisions, including the re­fusal to relocate the trial.

More on what's next, A7.

What willhappen next

After whatjurors saw,no simple

choice

Kevin CullenCOMMENTARY

JANE FLAVELL COLLINS

Use of a weapon of mass destruction (pres­sure cooker bomb #2) in the vicinity of 755Boylston St., and aiding and abetting, result­ing in the deaths of Lingzi Lu and MartinRichard.

Possession or use of a firearm (pressurecooker bomb #2) during and in relation to acrime of violence, namely, use of a weaponof mass destruction, and aiding and abetting,resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard.

Bombing of a place of public use (pressurecooker bomb #2) in the vicinity of 755 Boyl­ston St., and aiding and abetting, resulting inthe deaths of Lu and Richard.

Possession or use of a firearm (pressurecooker bomb #2) during and in relation to acrime of violence, namely, the bombing of aplace of public use, and aiding and abetting,resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard.

Malicious destruction of property by meansof an explosive (pressure cooker bomb #2),and aiding and abetting, resulting in thedeaths of Lu and Richard.

Possession or use of a firearm (pressurecooker bomb #2) during and in relation to acrime of violence, and aiding and abetting,resulting in the deaths of Lu and Richard.

DEATH PENALTY FOR 6 OF THE 17 COUNTS

9

10

14

15

By Patricia WenGLOBE STAFF

The 24­page verdict form com­pleted by jurors Friday in thedeath­penalty trial of Boston Mara­

t h o n b o m b e rDzhokhar Tsar­naev sent one clearmessage: The de­

fense team’s narrative about whythis lanky, expressionless defen­dant deserved a measure of sympa­

thy did not ring true.During deliberations over 14½

hours, the jury rejected each of fourkey aspects of the defense case. Thepanel did not agree that Tsarnaevcame under the domination of anolder brother, that he was largelyneglected by troubled parents, andthat the toughest high­securityprison in America would preventhim from achieving future fame.

And in what may have been piv­

otal in the jury’s decision, the panelalso rejected the defense conten­tion that the 21­year­old Cam­bridge high school graduate was re­morseful. Tsarnaev showed littleemotion throughout the trial, evenwhen some victims with prostheticlegs testified about multiple surger­ies they have endured, or BB’s stilllodged in their bodies.

“His lack of remorse sealed hisfate,” said George Vien, a former

veteran federal prosecutor in Bos­ton with death­penalty expertise.

No jurors were available forcomment in the courthouse afterthe verdict was read, and theiridentities have so far been keptconfidential by the court.

But the jury’s reasoning can bepotentially gleaned from the ver­dict form, which shows how mem­bers voted on dozens of “aggravat­

ANALYSIS, Page A8

Defense unable to generate sympathy for a terrorist

By David Abeland John R. Ellement

GLOBE STAFF

There was deep relief, and therewas angst.

A federal jury’s dramatic decisionFriday to sentence Boston Marathonbomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to deathsparked mixed feelings among thesurvivors, emergency personnel, andothers who experienced the horrorunleashed when two homemadepressure­cooker bombs detonatednear the finish line of the world­re­nowned race on April 15, 2013.

Sydney Corcoran was seriouslyinjured in the blasts, along with hermother, Celeste, who lost both legs.After the verdict, Sydney turned tosocial media.

“My mother and I think thatNOW he will go away and we will beable to move on. Justice,’’ SydneyCorcoran wrote on her Twitter ac­count. “In his own words, ‘an eye foran eye.’ ”

Heather Abbott, who lost her leftleg below the knee after the secondbomb exploded on Boylston Street,

FAMILIES, Page A7

Sense of relief for some survivors, but little peace

JOHN TLUMACKI/GLOBE STAFF

Kevin Corcoran, his daughter Sydney (left), seriously injured in the attack, and hiswife, Celeste, who lost both legs, embraced after the verdict. The four killed by theTsarnaevs (from top): Lingzi Lu, Martin Richard, Krystle Campbell, and Sean Collier.

NEWSANALYSIS

4

5