Vijay Textiles

7/31/2019 Vijay Textiles

1/101


2/101

- 1 -

DECLARATION

I hereby declare that this project report titled

A STUDY ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

is submitted by me to Osmania University is a bonafide work undertaken by

me and it is not submitted to any other University or Institute for the award

of any Degree / Diploma / Certificate or published any time before.

.


3/101

- 2 -

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

At the out set, I wish to express my sincere thanks to almighty for showering his

blessing on me to develop this project.

I would like to acknowledge my sincere thanks to _FACULTY______for her

excellent guidance and supervision for the completion of this project successfully.

I am deeply indebted to the Principal__________ for enabling me to do this

project.

I express my sincere thanks to ____COMPANY ASSOCIATE___ for according

permission to carry out this study in his esteemed organization.

Last but not the least I wish to thank my Parents who always believed me and

have faith in me in whatever I wished to do.


4/101

- 3 -

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PARTICULARS PAGE NO

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION AND DESIGN OF THESTUDY 1-11

1.1 Introduction of the Study

1.2 Objective of the Study

1.3 Research Methodology

1.3.1 Research Design

1.3.2 Nature of Data

1.3.3 Methods Data Collection

1.3.4 Research Tools

1.4 Limitations of the Study

CHAPTER II 2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE12-15

CHAPTER III

PROFILE 16-35

3.1 Industry Profile

3.2 Company Profile

CHAPTER IVDATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 36-85

CHAPTER VFINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS 86-91

5.1 Findings

5.2 Suggestions

CONCLUSION AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 92-95

6.1 Conclusion

6.2 Bibliography


5/101

- 4 -

LIST OF TABLE

SL.NO PARTICULRSPAGE

NO

1Current ratio

38

2Liquid ratio

40

3 Absolute liquidity ratio 42

4Debt equity ratio

44

5Proprietary ratio

46

6Stock turnover ratio

48

7Fixed assets turnover ratio

50

8Working capital turnover ratio

52

9 Total assets turnover ratio 54

10Capital turnover ratio

56

11Return on total assets

58

12Gross profit ratio

60

13Net profit ratio

62

14Expenses ratio

64

15Common Size Income Statement (2004, 2005)

66


67


68


6/101

- 5 -


69

19Common Size Balance Sheet (2004, 2005)

70


71


72


73

23Comparative income Statement (2004, 2005)

74


75


76


77

27Comparative Balance Sheet (2004, 2005)

78


79


80


81

31Trend income statement

82

32Trend Balance sheet

85


7/101

- 6 -

LIST OF CHARTS

SL.NO PARTICULRS PAGE NO

1 Current ratio 39

2 Liquid ratio 41

3 Absolute liquidity ratio 43

4 Debt equity ratio 45

5 Proprietary ratio 47

6 Stock turnover ratio 49

7 Fixed assets turnover ratio 51

8 Working capital turnover ratio 53

9 Total assets turnover ratio 55

10 Capital turnover ratio 57

11 Return on total assets 59

12 Gross profit ratio 61

13 Net profit ratio 63

14 Expenses ratio 65


8/101

- 1 -

CHAPTER- IINTRODUCTION

Contents:

1.1 Introduction of Study

1.2 Objective of the Study

1.3 Research Methodology1.3.1 Research Design

1.3.2 Nature of Data1.3.3 Methods Data Collection1.3.4 Research Tools

1.4 Limitations of the Study


9/101

- 2 -

1.1 INTRODUCTION

Financial statement:

A financial statement is an organized collection of data according to logical and

consistent accounting procedures. Its purpose is to convey an understanding of some

financial aspects of a business firm. It may show a position at a moment of time as in the

case of a balance sheet, or may reveal a series of activities over a given period of time, as

in the case of an income statement.

Thus, the term financial statement generally refers to the basis statements;

i) The income statement

ii) The balance sheet

iii) A statement of retained earnings

iv) A statement of charge in financial position in addition to the above two

statement.

Financial statement analysis:

It is the process of identifying the financial strength and weakness of a firm from

the available accounting data and financial statement. The analysis is done by properlyestablishing the relationship between the items of balance sheet and profit and loss

account the first task of financial analyst is to determine the information relevant to the

decision under consideration from the total information contained in the financial

statement. The second step is to arrange information in a way to highlight significant

relationship. The final step is interpretation and drawing of inferences and conclusion.

Thus financial analysis is the process of selection relating and evaluation of the

accounting data/information.

This studying contain following analysis:

1) comparative analysis statement

2) common-size analysis statement

3) Ratio analysis

4) Trend analysis.


10/101

- 3 -

1)Comparative financial statement:

Comparative financial statement is those statements which have been

designed in a way so as to provide time perspective to the consideration of various

elements of financial position embodied in such statements. In these statements, figures

for two or more periods are placed side by side to facilitate comparison.

But the income statement and balance sheet can be prepared in the form of

comparative financial statement.

i) Comparative income statement:

The income statement discloses net profit or net loss on account of

operations. A comparative income statement will show the absolute figures for two or

more periods. The absolute change from one period to another and if desired. The change

in terms of percentages. Since, the figures for two or more periods are shown side by

side; the reader can quickly ascertain whether sales have increased or decreased, whether

cost of sales has increased or decreased etc.

ii) Comparative balance sheet:

Comparative balance sheet as on two or more different dates can be used

for comparing assets and liabilities and finding out any increase or decrease in those

items. Thus, while in a single balance sheet the emphasis is on present position, it is on

change in the comparative balance sheet. Such a balance sheet is very useful in studying

the trends in an enterprise.

2) common-size financial statement:

Common-size financial statement are those in which figures reported areconverted into percentages to some common base in the income statement the sales figure

is assumed to be 100 and all figures are expressed as a percentage of sales. Similarly, in

the balance sheet, the total of assets or liabilities is taken as 100 and all the figures are

expressed as a percentage of this total.


11/101

- 4 -

3) Ratio analysis:

Ratio analysis is a widely used tool of financial analysis. The term ratioin it refers to the relationship expressed in mathematical terms between two individual

figures or group of figures connected with each other in some logical manner and areselected from financial statements of the concern. The ratio analysis is based on the factthat a single accounting figure by it self may not communicate any meaningfulinformation but when expressed as a relative to some other figure, it may definitelyprovide some significant information the relationship between two or more accountingfigure/groups is called a financial ratio helps to express the relationship between twoaccounting figures in such a way that users can draw conclusions about the performance,strengths and weakness of a firm.

Classification of ratios:

A) Liquidity ratios

B) Leverage ratios

C) Activity ratios

D) Profitability ratios

A) LIQUIDITY RATIOS:

These ratios portray the capacity of the business unit to meet its short term

obligation from its short-term resources (e.g.) current ratio, quick ratio.

i) Current ratio:

Current ratio may be defined as the relation ship between current assets and current

liabilities it is the most common ratio for measuring liquidity. It is calculated by dividing

current assets and current liabilities. Current assets are those, the amount of which can be

realized with in a period of one year. Current liabilities are those amounts which are

payable with in a period of one year.

Current assets

Current assets = -------------------------

Current liabilities


12/101


13/101

- 6 -

i) Debt equity ratio:

It expresses the relationship between the external equities and internal

equities or the relationship between borrowed funds and owners capital. It is a popular

measure of the long-term financial solvency of a firm. This relationship is shown by the

debt equity ratio. This ratio indicates the relative proportion of dept and equity in

financing the assets of a firm. This ratio is computed by dividing the total debt of the firm

by its equity (i.e.) net worth.

Outsiders funds

Debt equity ratio = ------------------------------Proprietors funds

ii) Proprietary ratio:

Proprietary ratio relates to the proprietors funds to total assets. It reveals the

owners contribution to the total value of assets. This ratio shows the long-time solvency

of the business it is calculated by dividing proprietors funds by the total tangible assets.

Proprietors funds

Proprietary ratio = ---------------------------

Total tangible assets

C) ACTIVITY RATIOS:

These ratios evaluate the use of the total resources of the business concern along

with the use of the components of total assets. They are intended to measure theeffectiveness of the assets management the efficiency with which the assts are used

would be reflected in the speed and rapidity with which the assets are converted into

sales. The greater the rate of turnover, the more efficient the management would be (E.g.)

stock turnover ratio, fixed assets turnover ratios etc.


14/101

- 7 -

i) Stock turnover ratio:

This ratio indicates whether investment is inventory is efficiently used or not it

explains whether investment in inventories in with in proper limits or not. It also

measures the effectiveness of the firms sales efforts the ratio is calculated as follows.

Cost of goods sold

Stock turnover ratio = -----------------------------

Average stock

Opening Stock + Closing Stock

Average stock = -----------------------------------------

2

ii) Fixed assets turnover ratio:

The ratio indicates the extent to which the investments in fixed assets contribute

towards sales. If compared with a pervious year. It indicates whether the investment

infixed assets has been judious or not the ratio is calculated as follows.

Net sales

Fixed assets turnover ratio = -------------------

Fixed assets

iii) Working capital turnover ratio:

Working capital turnover ratio indicates the velocity of the utilization of net

working capital. This ratio indicates the number of times the working capital is turned

over in the course of a year. It is a good measure overtrading and under-trading.

Net sales

Working capital turnover ratio = ----------------------------

Net working capital


15/101

- 8 -

iv) Return on total assets:

Profitability can be measured in terms of relationship between net profit and

total assets. It measures the profitability of investment. The overall profitability can be

known by applying this ratio.

Net profit

Return on total assets = ----------------------------- x100

Total assets

D)PROFITABILITY RATIOS:

The profitability ratios of a business concern can be measured by the profitability

ratios. These ratios highlight the end result of business activities by which alone the

over all efficiency of a business unit can be judged, (E.g.) gross ratios, Net profit ratio.

i) Gross profit ratio:

This ratio expresses the relationship between Gross profit and sales. It indicated

the efficiency of production or trading operation. A high gross profit ratio is a good

management as it implies that cost of production is relatively low.

Gross profit

Gross profit ratio = ----------------------------------- x 100

Net sales


16/101

- 9 -

i) Net profit ratio:

Net profit ratio establishes a relationship between net profit (after taxes) and sales.

It is determined by dividing the net income after tax to the net sales for the period and

measures the profit per rupee of sales.

Net profit

Net profit sales = ----------------- x 100

Net sales

iii) Expenses ratio:

This ratio establishes the relationship between various indirect expenses to net

sales.

a) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RATIO:

Administrative expenses

Administrative expenses ratio = ------------------------------- x 100

Sales

b) SELLING &DISTRIBUTION EXPENSES RATIO:

Selling &distribution expenses

Selling &distribution expenses ratio = ----------------------------------------- x 100

Sales


17/101

- 10 -

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The basic objective of studying the ratios of the company is to knowthe financial position of the company.

To know the borrowings of the company as well as the liquidityposition of the company.

To study the current assets and current liabilities so as to knowweather the shareholders could invest in Vijay Textiles Ltd or not.

To study the profits of the business and net sales of the business andto know the stock reserve for sales of the business.

To know the solvency of the business and the capacity to give interestto the long term loan lenders (debenture holders) and dividend to theshare holders.

To study the balance of cash and credit in the organization.

1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:

1.3.1 Research design:

The descriptive form of research method is adopted for study.

The major purpose of descriptive research is description of state of affairs of

the institution as it exits at present. The nature and characteristics of the financial

statements of Vijay Textiles Ltd have been described in this study.

1.3.2 Nature of data:

The data required for the study has been collected from secondary source .The

relevant information were taken from annual reports, journals and internet.


18/101

- 11 -

1.3.3 Methods of data collection:

This study is based on the annual report of Vijay Textiles Ltd. Hence the information

related to, profitability, short term and long term solvency and turnover were very much

required for attaining the objectives of the present study.

1.3.4 Tools applied:

To have a meaningful analysis and interpretation of various data collected, the

following tools were made for this study.

Ratio analysis

Common-size statement

Comparative statement

Trend analysis

1.4 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY:

The analysis was made with the help of the secondary data collected

from the company.

All the limitations of ratio analysis, common-size statement,

comparative statements, and trend analysis and interpret are

applicable to this study.

The period of study is 5 years from 2003-04 to 2007-08.


19/101

- 12 -

CHAPTER- IIREVIEW OF LITERATURE

Contents:

2.1 Review Of Literature


20/101

- 13 -

1. Environmental and Financial Performance LiteratureAbstract

"We review the growing literature relating corporate environmentalperformance to financial performance. We seek to identifyachievements and limitations of this literature and to highlight areas forfurther research. Our primary interest is to assess the adequacy of theliterature in informing corporate managers how, when, and where tomake pro-environment investments that will pay off with financialreturns for long-term shareholders. To do so, we create a conceptualframework that maps the influence of regulators, public healthscientists, environmental advocates, consumers, employees, and otherinterested parties upon corporate financial returns. Our discussion hasrelevance to all parties interested in influencing corporate actions thataffect the environment."

2. An Investigation of the Perceived Financial Performance

Abstract

"This paper is primarily based on Rogers diffusion of innovations

theory and Augers empirical study. An empirical research study was

conducted to investigate the perceived financial performance ofcommercial printing firms for conducting business-to-customer (B2C)activities using Web technology. Financial performance was measuredusing four financial indicators: sales, profits, costs, and return-on-investment (ROI). The diffusion of innovations theory states that aninnovation brings changes to a company. Web technology is aninnovation that affects companys performance. This paper investigates

the effect of Web technology on commercial printing firms financial

performance."


21/101

- 14 -

3. Strategic and Financial Performance Implications of GlobalSourcing Strategy: A Contingency Analysis

Abstract

"Using a contingency model of global sourcing strategy, this studyinvestigated the moderating effects of sourcing-related factors on therelationship between sourcing strategy and a product's strategic andfinancial performance. The results lent some support to the contingencymodel of global sourcing strategy in that product innovation, processinnovation and asset specificity were significant moderator variables for

financial, but not strategic, performance. However, the results providedno support for bargaining power of suppliers and transaction frequencyas moderator variables. In other words, in achieving high financialperformance for a product, whether a particular sourcing strategyshould be used for a particular product depended on the levels ofproduct innovation, process innovation and asset specificity."

4. Implications for financial performance and corporate socialresponsibility

Abstract

"We investigate whether CEO implicit motives predict corporate socialperformance and financial performance. Using longitudinal data on 258CEOs from 118 firms, and controlling for country and industry effects,we found that motives significant predicted both financial performance(Tobin's Q and the CAPM) and social responsibility. In general, needfor power and responsibility disposition were positively predictive

whereas need for achievement and affiliation were negatively predictiveof outcomes. Contrary to previous theorizing, corporate socialresponsibility had no link to financial performance. Our findingssuggest that executive characteristics have important consequences forcorporate level outcomes."


22/101

- 15 -

5. Financial statement analysis: A data envelopment analysisapproach

Abstract

"Ratio analysis is a commonly used analytical tool for verifying theperformance of a firm. While ratios are easy to compute, which in partexplains their wide appeal, their interpretation is problematic,especially when two or more ratios provide conflicting signals. Indeed,ratio analysis is often criticized on the grounds of subjectivity, that isthe analyst must pick and choose ratios in order to assess the overallperformance of a firm.

In this paper we demonstrate that Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

can augment the traditional ratio analysis. DEA can provide aconsistent and reliable measure of managerial or operational efficiencyof a firm. We test the null hypothesis that there is no relationshipbetween DEA and traditional accounting ratios as measures ofperformance of a firm. Our results reject the null hypothesis indicatingthat DEA can provide information to analysts that is additional to thatprovided by traditional ratio analysis. We also apply DEA to the oil andgas industry to demonstrate how financial analysts can employ DEA asa complement to ratio analysis."


23/101

- 16 -

CHAPTER- III

PROFILE

Contents:

3.1 Industry Profile

3.2 Company Profile


24/101

- 17 -

3.1 INDUSTRY PROFILE

Indian Garment Industry- an OverviewThe Garment industry is one of India's largest foreign exchange earning

industries. This accounts to 16% of the countrys total exports earnings. As per the 1996

Indian textile exports records total garment export value was Rs.35,000 crores of which

apparel occupied over Rs14, 000 crores.

It has been estimated that India has 30,000 readymade garment

manufacturing units and around three million people are working in this industry. Today

garment export business grows, with the help of enthusiasm shown by the foreign buyers

at a high level. Today many leading fashion labels are being associated with Indian

products. India is increasingly being looked upon as a major supplier of high quality

fashion apparels and Indian apparels are highly appreciated in major markets

internationally. The credit goes to the exporters and the government which spontaneously

helping in liberalizing the export policies and tax reduction methods.

Consistent efforts towards extensive market coverage, improving technical

capabilities and putting together an attractive and wide merchandise line has paid rich

dividends. But till today, our garment industry is dominated by sub-contractors and it

consists mainly small units having 50 to 60 machines. India's supply base is medium

quality, relatively high fashion, but small volume of business.

Recent recession in Europe and the South Asian currency crisis have also

contributed their own bits to the decimating Indian exports. Though these are expected to

fizzle out soon, there is no reason for complacency on the part of Indian exporters or of

the garment industry. The industry will soon competitively face the short falls faced with

regard short of quotas, tariffs, etc.

Thus the need of the hour is to enlarge both manufacturing as well as the

marketing base. Inculcation of a spirit of innovation by way of research and development

and tapping new markets especially in South Africa, Central Africa, East European

countries, Latin America and Australia is also mandatory for export growth.


25/101

- 18 -

The Size of India's Textile industry.

The textile industry in India covers a wide gamut of activities ranging from

production of raw material like cotton, jute, silk and wool to providing high value-added

products such as fabrics and garments to consumers.

The industry uses a wide variety of fibers ranging from natural fibers like cotton,

jute, silk and wool to man made fibers like polyester, viscose, acrylic and multiple blends

of such fibers and filament yarn.

The textile industry plays a significant role in Indian economy by providing direct

employment to an estimated 35 million people, by contributing 4 per cent of GDP and

accounting for 35 per cent of gross export earnings. The textile sector contributes 14 per

cent of the value-addition in the manufacturing sector.

Textile exports during the period of April-February 2003-2004 amounted to

$11,698.5 million as against $11,142.2 million during the same period in the previous

year, showing an increase of around 5 per cent.

Estimates say that the textile sector might achieve about 15 to 18 per cent growth

this year following dismantling of MFA.

Now that the quantitative restrictions are all gone in this huge industry, has itchanged the way the garment manufacturers are operating these days? Are the foreign

orders for Indian garment exporters going up?

"Nothing dramatic has happened in the textiles exports as of now. There is no

deluge of orders. But it I think it will take somas time for the liberated textiles sector to

boom," points out K Baronet, a leading exporter of knitted garments from Torpor in

Tamil Nadir.

Exporters like Baronet do not expect huge orders in the immediate months.

"But we have ramped up our production capacities and are waiting for the big

business to come by," he said. Textile exporters from the garment hot-spot of Torpor are

keeping their fingers crossed.


26/101

- 19 -

Many of them as bullish on new export enquiries that have began to trickle in.

"The rush of garment exports in the quota-free regime has not yet happened in the

Indian textiles sector. That is because the normal product and export cycle of garments isaround 60 days. We expect increased bookings by April," says R Shiva, executive

director of the Torpor-based garment factory Classic Polo.

He says in the liberalized textile era, companies will have to restructure their

production capacities to meet export orders.

Textile exporters anticipate huge orders from major American stores and brands.

"The biggest change is that large textile firms within India are buying small-scalegarment manufacturers to shore up their production facilities," says Torpor-based textiles

consultant Sinai Raja.

"In the months to come, companies will have to increase the production capacity

to face changed global textile trade," he points out.

Already, the Gujarat-based Super Spinning Mills Ltd has moved in to acquire two

sick textile mills in Madura. To increase the company's yarn production capacity and tocater to the united States export market.

But there are many challenges ahead. "The competitive advantage that India enjoys now

is the low cost of production here. But the real challenge is to develop and offer value-

added services to foreign customers, especially in countries like America," says Raja.

Consultants like Raja also add that the textile industry in India will need greater supply-

chain efficiencies and flexible labor laws to succeed in the world market.

The Union government has repeatedly said that whatever the state was expected to do for

the textile industry have already been done.

Thus, it is now the industry's turn to step into the new world order in the unshackled

textiles global market.


27/101


28/101

- 21 -

In knitwear production, its share is 70 per cent of the country's total production of

$3.5billion. "If this situation continues, the foreign buyers will shift their orders to our

competitors like China and once the business goes out of India, it is very difficult to

regain the lost markets",

All the investments made to the tune of more than Rest 25,000 crore in the past couple of

years will become idle which in turn will hit the banks which have financed the

exporters.

"This apart, it posed threat to continued employment of about 500,000 people, both direct

and indirect besides affecting the interest of farmers with reduced consumption of

cotton", he added. To put an end to this environmental crisis, Tirupur units have decided

to implement a marine discharge system.

"The Marine Discharge Project can be implemented as a public and private

partnership and we could execute this project as we did in New Torpor Area

Development Corporation Limited a year ago", industry sources said.

The industry is pitching for a contribution of Rest 600 crore as grant from the Centre for

implementing this project and to find a permanent solution for the dyeing units' problem

in the region.


29/101


30/101

- 23 -

proposes to manufacture more of blended fabrics as the margins are higher in these

varieties.

The Company is presently operating ala capacity of 5-6 lac metres per month. The

Company's Corporate Office and Godown is situated at the prime location "Surya

Towers" in Secunderabad.

In the very first year of manufacturing activity i.e.1993-94 the Company has achieved a

Post Tax Profits of Rs. 98.03 lacs on turnover of Rs. 1304.88 lacs. The major factors

that has contributed for the tremendous increase in the sales for the year ended

31.3.1994 over the year ending 31.3.1993 are

i) The Company's manufacturing activity commenced from September 1993 onwards

which have yielded higher margins. Prior to that the Company was carrying on onlytrading activity.

ii) The Company was able to fully meet the demand for fabrics of the desired designs

required quality and quantity at a competitive price during the festive season of Pongal in

January 1994.

The Company during 1993-94 concentrated mainly on 100% Polyester Fabrics

and Grey Fabrics. This product mix was subsequently shifted in favour of Blended

Fabrics which yield substantial margins. This is reflected in the half year results of the

Company ended 31st December 1994. The Company has achieved Profits After Tax to

the tune of Rs. 212.26 lacs on a turnover of Rs. 1536.58 lakhs.

Our vision is to take up new challenges and implement them with the highest

quality standards. The Group also specializes in the childrens garments and bottoms

sector.

It is noteworthy to mention that Vijay Textiles Ltd have been award the ISO 9002

Certification in May 2001 and have subsequently upgraded to the ISO 9001-2000

Certification.


31/101

- 24 -

Management

The Group is headed by Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, designated as the Chairman

and Managing director. He has three decades of rich experience in the garment industry

at various levels.

Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta is ably supported by a team of talented and dedicated

professionals from the garment and allied industries.

The Groups progressive HR policies and welfare programmes ensure a

transparent, productive and growth oriented environment to the 1300 plus employees who

play a key role to the success enjoyed by the organization as a prominent exporter of

garments.

Social accountability

At Vijay Textiles Ltd every employee is treated with great care. Apart

from a great salary structure they benefit from ESI, PI, and Gratuity etc. Vijay Textiles

Ltd is proud that some of the employees have put in more than 19 years of service that

speaks a lot about the groups commitment to their employees. The group also strictly

believes in the No Child Lab our Law.

Environmental Accountability

Vijay Textiles Ltd maintains high safely standards, and not to forget the Effluent

treatment plant, which plays a big role in their commitment to preserving the delicate

eco-system.

Suppliers

Over the years Vijay Textiles Ltd has established a reliable and strong support

network for all its supply needs. Nearly 500 looms are controlled and managed across

South Indian towns such as Salem, Nagari, Coimbatore and Cannanore for production of

power loom fabrics of various yarn counts.

Fabrics are also procured from reputed mills such as BVM and Arvind Mills-

Ahmedabad, Nahar- Punjab, Velcord- Mumbai and Premier Mills- Hosur.


32/101

- 25 -

All Procurements are made from the above firms in accordance with

predetermined quality standards andregular checks are conducted to ensure accordance

of the same.

Domestic Market

The Group has recently forayed into the booming domestic apparel industry by

launching its own brands Indus Valley (mens and womens clothing) and Sherwood

(kids range) in the local market. The brands are stocked and marketed in a company

owned exclusive outlet and also at various leading garment and lifestyle stores.

The products promoted under these brand names have already gained a

tremendous response from the domestic market.

Infrastructure

Machinery:

Latest world class machines from Durkopp Adler of Germany , Juki, Tajima and

Brother of Japan have been installed at the manufacturing units for an installed capacity

of 1,40,000 garment units per month.

800 sewing machines including special purpose machines have been installed for

quality production i9n large volumes.

Two TAJIMA computerized Embroidery Machines with 20 heads each, A

BARUDAN computerized Embroidery Machine with 20 heads each , A pocket

welting machine for cut pockets from Durkopp Adler, Germany and CAD machine from

Gerber, USA for pattern development , complete sophisticated machinery set up in the

factories of the East West Group . We have recently added a TAJIMA Embroidery @

sequin attaching machine.

As a matter of policy and commitment to quality production, machineries at the

units are replaced every 3 years.


33/101


34/101


35/101

- 28 -

One copy is sent to the accounts department.

The purchase order provides detailed information to the supplier regarding price,

quantity, delivery terms, etc. It reduces the purchasing and clerical work into a routine.

RECEIVING AND INSPECTION OF MATERIALS:

In large organization there may be a separate department for receiving the

materials. But in this organization, this may be entrusted to the store keeper.

FUNCTION OF RECEIVING DEPARTMENT:

Keeping purchase order files in a systematic way.

Receiving and unpacking of materials sent by supplier under various challans.

Verifying the materials received by comparing with purchase orders. This

includes checking quantity, quality, and physical condition of material.

GOODS RECEIVED NOTE:

Preparing a goods received note (GRN), entering the details of materials received

for the information of all those concerned with materials.

Generally, five copies of goods received are purchase and used as given below:

One copy is retained by the goods receiving department.

Four copies are to the store keeper along with materials. The store keeper will verify the

entries with actual goods Countersign them and will send one copy to the purchase

department; one copy to the account department; one copy to be department which

initiated the requisition and one copy is retained by the store keeper.

VERIFYING AND PASSING SUPPLIERS INVOICE FOR PAYMENT

AND DEDUCTION OF TDS:

Based on goods received note, purchases are verified and a payment is made to

supplier. When the invoice is received from the supplier, it is sent to the accounting

department to check the authenticity as well as accuracy. The quantity, price and amount

received are checked with reference to purchase order and goods received note. If


36/101

- 29 -

everything is found in order, the accounting section approves the invoice for payment and

the cashier makes the payment as per the agreed.

TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE (TDS):

In certain specified case of income, tax should deduce at source by the person

responsible for making payment of such income. As per rule, while making payment to

the supplier TDS is deducted from the payment at a certain rate and the actual amount is

only paid to the concerned supplier.

Payment to contractors

Tax deduction at source on commission and brokerage

Tax deduction at sources on rent

Tax deduction at sources on fees for technical or professionals services

SALES DEPARTMENTS:

Selling is most characteristic feature of the modern marketing system. It is

important not only for increasing the profits of businessman but also for making the

goods and services available to the consumers. The main object of production is to sell

the goods produces. The efficiency of marketing efforts can be measured only from the

volume of sales affected y a businessman.

According to the sec (1) of the sale of goods act, a contract of sale is a

contract where by the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the

buyer for a price. In simple sense, sale means any transfer of property in goods by one

person to another cash deferred payment for any other valuable consideration.


37/101

- 30 -

SALES PROCEDURE:

REGISTRATION

LETTER OF CREDIT

PROFOMA INVOICE

PRODUCTION OF GOODS

SHIPMENT OF GOODS

NEGOTIATION OF DOCUMENT

SECURING PAYMENT

REGISTRATION:

Exporting involves lot of formalities and it is a lengthy and complicated process.

An exporter is registering his business with various government agencies. Some of the

main steps are to decide the nature of business, to open a bank account, to fox credit

limit, to obtain fax facility, to obtain code number etc.


38/101

- 31 -

LETTER OF CREDIT:

A letter of credit is a payment term generally used for international sales

transactions. It is basically a mechanism, which allows importers/buyers to offer secure

terms of payment to exporters/sellers in which a bank gets involved. The technical term

for letter of credit is documentary credit. The idea in an international trade transaction is

to shift the risk from the actual buyer to a bank. Thus the process works both in favor of

both the buyer and seller.

PROFOMA INVOICE:

After opening letter of credit the exporter gives a quotation or an offer for sale to

the foreign buyer. It is usually in the form of profoma invoice. This gives information

regarding.

Name and address of the buyer or consignee

Description of goods to be sold

Price

Period of delivery

Mode of payment

Condition of sale and Other provision such as packing specification, Concessions or discount if any, etc.

The customers of essay exports i.e., importer plays an order for preparing sample

garments mentioning type of fabric, cooler of the garments, type of print and specimen of

embroidery and wash care instructions and grams per meter of the garments.

Based on the above the sample department of essay exports develop the sample

and sent for approval, any further correction by the buyer is also carried out and the

specimen garments is prepared which is called prototype then price is quoted for various

size small, medium large of the prototype on a format which is called preformed invoice.

When a preformed invoice is accepted by the buyer, it becomes a

confirmed order and it is a signal for the exporter to proceed with the formalities

connected with the exporter of the goods mentioned.


39/101

- 32 -

PRODUCTION OF GOODS:

The next steps in the processing of a sales order are to make arrangements for

production of the goods. The exporter if he is a manufacturer should then make

arrangements for the productions of the item ordered by the buyer. Once the goods are

ready for shipments they should be packed and marked properly.

If the buyer has given specific instructions about packing and marking they

should be followed accordingly. Marking should include the shipping marks of the

consignee, the part of destination, measurements, the country of origin etc.

SHIPMENTS OF GOODS:

Then the exporter may have top arrange for booking of shipping space in advance

of actual sending of goods. Shipping is the most commonly used method of dispatching

goods to a foreign country. Goods are also sent by air or sea good can be shipped out of

India only after obtaining the customs clearance. To obtain the customs clearance, the

exporter should submit bill in the prescribed form. The shipping bills should be

accompanied by the following documents:

Contracts with the overseas buyer in original

Invoice of the goods

Packing list

A profoma showing details of drawback of duty if any claimed

A copy of the letter of credit if any

The customs authorities verified the goods and scrutinize the shipping bill and

other requisite documents and if satisfied, they put it for export subject to the physical

examination of the cargo by the customs staff. After finishing all the customs formalities,

the shipping company issues a shipping order to the exporters when it agrees to carry the

exporters goods. The shipping order is a document containing instructions to the captain

of the ship to accept goods on the board the ship from the exporter or his agent. Then, the

credit worthiness of the importer should be thoroughly verified.


40/101

- 33 -

NEGOTIATION OF DOCUMENTS

Once the goods have been physically loaded on board the ship, the exporter

should arrange to obtain payment for the exports by negotiating the relevant documents

through banks. A complete set of documents submitted for the purpose of negotiation is

called negotiating set of document which usually consists of the following.

Letter of credit

Commercial invoice together with the packing slip

Certificate of origin

Marine insurance policy in duplicate

GR- 1 fromduplicate and triplicate

Bill of lading/air way bill incomplete set.

COMMERCIAL INVOICE:

It is a document prepared by the exporter. It gives details of the goods shipped,

their description, the shipping marks, the unit and total value as the case may be. Based

on the contract, the number and date of the bill of lading as well as the name of the ship

cargo. The invoice should be made out of in the name of the buyer mentioned in the LC

i.e. letter of credit.

CERFICATE OF ORIGIN:

Certificate of origin states the country in which products under export were

original produced manufactured. It is quite likely that the goods produced in a particular

country attract preferential tariff rated in the foreign market at the time of importation or

it may be that goods produced in a particular banned for import in the foreign market.

The certificate of origin helps the buyer in adhering to the import regulations of thecountry.

MARINE INSURANCE:

In case the contract with the foreign buyer is on C.I (i.e. cost and insurance) or

C.I.F. (i.e. cost, insurance and freight basis), the exporter has to make insurance cover

against all the risks of damages to or loss of goods during the sea voyage or airway for


41/101

- 34 -

getting the insurance cover the exporter has to submit an application describing the goods

and mentioning the name of ship.

On which the goods are located as well as the value of the goods for application

the insurance company issues a policy in the name of the exporter and endorsed in bank.

Sometimes, the insurance may also be taken by the buyer as it is based on the contract

between thetwo.

BILL OF LADING:

The bill of lading is a receipt given by the shipping company for the goods loaded

on a particular ship. It is one of the most important documents in the process of

exporting because it carries with it the legal title to the goods shipped on board the vessel

indicated there in.

It gives broad description of goods, the quantity of goods, the total number of

packages, gross and net weight, the part of shipment, the part if discharge, the name of

the ship and the amount of freight to be paid in case of already prepaid or freight to be

collected. The date on the bill of lading is highly significant because it is the one, which

is taken as the date of the shipment of goods and should therefore be within the validity

date given documentary letter of credit.

BILL OF EXCHANGE:

Submitting a complete set of negotiable document to the negotiating bank through

which the documentary letter of credit has been advised is the first step in the negotiation

or procedure. Where all the terms, and conditions of the letter of credit has been

complied with by the exporter while submitting his documents to the negotiating bank,

the documents are deemed to be clean. The letter of credit opened by the buyer through

his bank authorizes drawing a bill of exchange against which payment will be made by

the opening bank on behalf of the buyer, provided the terms and conditions specified in

the letter of credit are complied with.

A bill of exchange is a draft drawn by the negotiating bank on the opening bank

or the buyer as the may be, and is an instrument of payment, which negotiable. The

drafts drawn are of two types. One is sight draft.


42/101

- 35 -

SECURING PAYMENT:

The exporter can resort to a number of alternatives for securing payment of export

dues from the importers. This depends on his contact with the importer. In this concern,

a bill of exchange is prepared for invoice amount thus two set of documents containing

bill of exchange, invoice, negotiable copy of the bill of lading is presented to the bankers

along with letter of credit. The bankers of essay exports scrutiny the document and credit

the invoice amount in local currency.

EXPORT COUNTRIES:

This concern exporting (i.e. sales) textiles & garments to the

following countries namely,

1. Germany 3.USA 5.Italy

2. France 4.Japan 6.Australia


43/101


44/101

- 37 -

RATIO ANALYSIS:

Ratio analysis is a widely used tool of financial analysis.

The term ratio in it refers to the relationship expressed in mathematical

terms between two individual figures or group of figures connected with

each other in some logical manner and are selected from financial statements

of the concern. The ratio analysis is based on the fact that a single

accounting figure by it self may not communicate any meaningful

information but when expressed as a relative to some other figure, it may

definitely provide some significant information the relationship between two

or more accounting figure/groups is called a financial ratio helps to express

the relationship between two accounting figures in such a way that users can

draw conclusions about the performance, strengths and weakness of a firm.

Classification of ratios:

A) Liquidity ratios

B) Leverage ratios

C) Activity ratios

D) Profitability ratios

A) Liquidity ratios:

These ratios portray the capacity of the business unit to meet its short

term obligation from its short-term resources (e.g.) current ratio, quick ratio.


45/101


46/101

- 39 -

CHART-1CURRENT RATIO

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Current ratio

Interpretation and Analysis:

The above table and diagram shows that the current ratio in the year 2003-04

was 2.26 and then in increases to 3.38 in the year 2004-05, further moveupwards to 3.80 and in the year 2006-07 it slashed down to 1.52 and finally

in the year 2007-08 it again moved up to 2.91.

The normal current ratio is 2:1. The above table shows current ratio is

more than 2% in all the first four years. But in 2006-2007 the current ratio is

lower than the normal. This shows that the company is enjoying credit

worthiness.


47/101

- 40 -

ii) LIQUID RATIO:

The term liquidity refers to the ability of a firm to pay its

short-term obligation as and when they become due. The term quick assets

or liquid assets refers current assets which can be converted into cash

immediately it comprises all current assets except stock and prepaid

expenses it is determined by dividing quick assets by quick liabilities.

Liquid assets

Liquid ratio = -------------------------

Liquid liabilities

TABLE-2LIQUID RATIO:

Year Liquid assets Liquid liabilities Ratio

2003-2004 47,782,491.51 20,073,088.54 2.382004-2005 55,809,100.59 25,805,580.98 2.162005-2006 54,831,547.34 20,615,801.31 2.65

2006-2007 76,488,121.13 29,645,904.71 2.58

2007-2008 18,362,128.30 18,784,066.35 0.97


48/101

- 41 -

CHART-2LIQUID RATIO:

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Liquid Ratio


The above table and diagram shows the liquid ratio during the

study period except in the year 2007-2008 is more than the normal (i.e.)

1:1.It was 2.38 in the year 2003-04 and reached the highest in 2005-06 to

2.65 and then came down to .97 in the year 2007-08.

Hence the firm is controlling its stock position because therelinear relationship between current ratio and liquid ratio.


49/101

- 42 -

ii) ABSOLUTE LIQUIDITY RATIO:

Absolute liquid assets include cash, bank, and marketable securities.

This ratio Obtained by dividing cash and bank and marketable securities by

current liabilities.

Cash + bank +marketable securities

Absolute liquidity ratio = ----------------------------------------------

Current liabilities

TABLE-3ABSOLUTE LIQUID RATIO:

Year Cash and securities Current liabilities Ratio

2003-2004 1,002,474 27,943,268 0.03

2004-2005 1,496,467 28,547,982 0.05

2005-2006 332,231 23,128,596 0.012006-2007 3,225,488 64,509,752 0.05

2007-2008 260,094 19,276,000.47 0.01


50/101

- 43 -

CHART-3

ABSOLUTE LIQUID RATIO:

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Absolute Ratio


The above table and diagram shows the absolute ratio for the study

period 2003-04 to 2007-08. There is fluctuation in the absolute ratio.It was

0.03 in the year 2003-04. In 2004-05 and 2006-07 it was 0.05. It was 0.01 in

2005-06 and 2007-08.


51/101


52/101

- 45 -

CHART-4

DEBT EQUITY RATIO:

0

0.1

0.2

0.30.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

2003-

04

2004-

05

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

Debt Equity Ratio


The above table and diagram shows the debt equity relationship of the

company during the study period. It was 0.4 in the 2003-04 and then reached

its highest in the next year and from there it began to slope downwards and

ultimately came to 0.38 in the year 2007-08.In all the years the equity is more when compared with borrowings.

Hence the company is maintaining its debt position


53/101

- 46 -

ii) PROPRIETARY RATIO:

Proprietary ratio relates to the proprietors funds to total assets. It

reveals the owners contribution to the total value of assets. This ratio shows

the long-time solvency of the business it is calculated by dividing

proprietors funds by the total tangible assets.

Proprietors funds

Proprietary ratio = ---------------------------

Total tangible assets

TABLE-5PROPRIETARY RATIO:

Year Proprietors funds Total assets Ratio

2003-2004 53,331,692 74,551,774 0.72

2004-2005 63,576,119 118,702,016 0.54

2005-2006 65,810,599 106,552,413 0.62

2006-2007 66,462,086 98,670,106 0.67

2007-2008 66,405,370 91,660,973 0.72


54/101

- 47 -

CHART-5

PROPRIETARY RATIO:

0

0.1

0.20.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

2003-

04

2004-

05

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

Proprietary Ratio

Interpretation and Analysis:The above table and diagram shows the proprietary ratio during the study

period. In all the years the owner's contribution to the total assets was

appropriate and they maintain their share in the company's assets.

Except 2005-06 in all the years the proprietor's contribution in to the total

assets is more than the 2/3. During 2004-05 it is more than 50%


55/101

- 48 -

C) ACTIVITY RATIOS:

These ratios evaluate the use of the total resources of the business

concern along with the use of the components of total assets. They are

intended to measure the effectiveness of the assets management the

efficiency with which the assts are used would be reflected in the speed and

rapidity with which the assets are converted into sales. The greater the rate

of turnover, the more efficient the management would be (E.g.) stock

turnover ratio, fixed assets turnover ratios etc.

i) STOCK TURNOVER RATIO:

This ratio indicates whether investment is inventory is efficiently used

or not it explains whether investment in inventories in with in proper limits

or not. It also measures the effectiveness of the firms sales efforts the ratio

is calculated as follows.

Cost of goods sold

Stock turnover ratio = -----------------------------

Average stock

Opening Stock + Closing Stock

Average stock = -----------------------------------------

2

TABLE-6STOCK TURNOVER RATIO:

Year Cost of goods sold Average stock Ratio

2003-2004 147,163,123 4,186,860 35.14

2004-2005 141,793,483 2,142,590 66.172005-2006 154,284,918 4,065,741 39.082006-2007 195,951,080 13,599,668 14.402007-2008 105,517,193 15,166,139 6.95


56/101

- 49 -

CHART-6

STOCK TURNOVER RATIO:

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2003-

04

2004-

05

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

Stock TurnoverRatio


The above table and diagram shows the relation ship between

costs of goods sold and average stock. During the year 2004-05 it is 66.17%

which shows higher position of cost of goods sold. In the years of study it is

shown above that the cost of goods sold are almost 35-65times of the

average stock. But at the same time during 2007-08 it is only 6.95 which

shows that more stock was remaining in the company.


57/101

- 50 -

ii) FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO:

The ratio indicates the extent to which the investments in fixed assets

contribute towards sales. If compared with a pervious year. It indicates

whether the investment infixed assets has been judious or not the ratio is

calculated as follows.

Net sales

Fixed assets turnover ratio = -------------------

Fixed assets

TABLE-7FIXED ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

Year Net sales Fixed assets Ratio

2003-2004 169,056,118 39,262,748 4.30

2004-2005 173,896,782 50,550,585 3.41

2005-2006 179,231,321 41,772,389 4.29

2006-2007 225,250,870 64,982,465 3.47

2007-2008 113,095,288 54,908,412 2.06


58/101

- 51 -

CHART-7

FIXED ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.53

3.5

4

4.5

2003-

04

2004-

05

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

Fixed Assets TurnoverRatio


The above table and diagram shows the relation ship between the

fixed assets and sales. The sale is 4 times more than the fixed assets 2003-04

and 2005-06. It is more than 3 times during 2004-05 and 2006-2007. It is

more than 2 times during 2007-08.It can be observed that in the year 2006-

07 the fixed assets value increased a lot and which shows that there is an

additions made to the fixed assets, similarly the sales was also increased

from 179,231,321(2005-06) to 225,250,870 (2006-07). However in the year

2007-08 it slashed to about 50% of the sales of 2006-07.


59/101

- 52 -

iii) WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

Working capital turnover ratio indicates the velocity of the utilization

of net working capital. This ratio indicates the number of times the working

capital is turned over in the course of a year. It is a good measure over

trading and under-trading.

Net sales

Working capital turnover ratio = ----------------------------

Net working capital

TABLE-8WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

Year Net sales Net working capital Ratio

2003-2004 169,056,118 35,289,026 4.79

2004-2005 173,869,782 68,151,430 2.552005-2006 179,231,321 64,780,024 2.77

2006-2007 225,250,870 33,687,641 6.692007-2008 113,095,288 36,752,561 3.08


60/101

- 53 -

CHART-8

WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

WC T/o Ratio


The above table and diagram shows the relation ship between net

working capital and net sales. During the years the sales is 2 to 7 times more

than the working capital. It was 4.79 in the year 2003-04 and as there was

more working capital the ratio sloped downwards and reached 2.77 in the

year 2005-06. As the sales increased and working capital decreased the

ration now moved up to 6.69 times and in the very next year as the salesslashed to 50% of the previous year the ration again decreased.


61/101

- 54 -

iv) TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO:

This ratio is an indicator of how the resources of the

organization utilized for increasing the turnover. It shows the ratio between

the total assets and the net sales of the company. From this ratio one can

understand how the assets are performing and being utilized in achieving the

objectives of the company.

Total assets

Total assets turnover ratio = -------------------

Net assets

TABLE-9

TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO:

Year Total assets Net sales Ratio

2003-2004 74,551,774 169,056,118 0.44

2004-2005 118,702,016 173,896,782 0.68

2005-2006 106,552,413 179,231,321 0.59

2006-2007 98,670,106 225,250,870 0.44

2007-2008 91,660,973 113,095,288 0.81


62/101

- 55 -

CHART-9TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO:

0

0.1

0.20.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Total assets T/o Ratio


The above table and diagram shows the relation ship between the total

assets to net sales. During all the study period years the relationship between

sales to total assets is high. The ratio increased from 0.44 (2003-04) to 0.68

(2004-05) and then it was decreasing and reached to again 0.44 in the year

2006-07 and raised to 0.81 in the year 2007-08 due to the heavy fall in the

sales. Thus the company's sales were almost directly proportionately in the

first three years of the study and then in the year 2006-07 it was adversely

affected.


63/101

- 56 -

v) CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

This is a ratio which shows how much sales are entertained

from the capital. It shows how the sales are attracted from the Proprietor's

Fund.

Sales

Capital turnover ratio = -----------------------

Proprietors fund

TABLE-10CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

Year Sales Proprietors funds Ratio

2003-2004 169,056,118 53,331,692 3.17

2004-2005 173,896,782 63,576,119 2.74

2005-2006 179,231,321 65,810,599 2.72

2006-2007 225,250,870 66,462,086 3.39

2007-2008 113,095,288 66,405,370 1.70


64/101

- 57 -

CHART-10

CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Capital T/o Ratio


The above table and diagram shows the relationship between

the sales and proprietors funds. In the year 2003-04 the ratio 3.17 and then it

was decreasing and reached 2.72 in the year 2005-06 and again raised to

3.39 in 2006-07 and in the final year i.e. 2007-08 it reached the lowest to

1.70. The sales are in between 1.5 and 3.5 times more than the proprietor's

funds. It shows the firms is maintaining the better utilization of own funds


65/101


66/101

- 59 -

CHART-11RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS RATIO

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.120.14

0.16

2003-

04

2004-

05

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

Return on TARatio


The above table and diagram shows the relationship between

net profit and total assets in percentage. As the total assets were increasing

year by year the net profit percentage was decreasing. The Net profit from

the year 2005-06 is very less and in the year 2007-08 the company made a

loss.


67/101


68/101


69/101


70/101


71/101


72/101

- 65 -

CHART-14

EXPENSES RATIO:

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

20

03-

04

20

04-

05

20

05-

06

20

06-

07

20

07-

08

Expense Ratio


The above table and diagram shows the relation ship between the

administration and selling expenses and sales. The administration and selling

expenses during 2007-08 is very high when compared to previous year's

%age as they were in between 13-20% of sales. This may also be one of the

reasons to a net loss in that year.


73/101

- 66 -

TABLE-15

Common size income statement (2003-04 &2004-05)

Inference:

The common size income statement for the year 2004 to 2005

reveals the following. The sales figure increasing year after year. It increased

about Rs.48,40,665. Administrative and other expenses were fluctuating. Theother income of the company was increased year by year.

Particulars 2003-2004 % 2004-2005 %Income:

Sales 169,056,118 89.61 173,896,783 88.16

Other income 18,550,813 9.85 22,257,266 11.28

Closing stock 1,033,090 0.54 1,109,500 0.56

Total income 188,640,021 100 197,263,548 100

Expenditure:

Opening stock 7,340,630 3.90 1,033,090 0.52

Purchases 90,966,622 48.22 110,670,457 56.10

Direct expenses 49,888,961 26.44 47,140,653 23.92

Administration expenses 15,776,297 8.36 18,864,268 9.56

Selling Expenses 7,888,149 4.18 9,432,134 4.78

Depreciation 6,079,468 3.22 650368 0.32

Total expenses 177,940,127 94.32 187,640,021 95.20

Net profit 10,699,894 5.68 9,472,578 4.80

Total 188,640,894 100 197,263,548 100


74/101

- 67 -

TABLE-16

Common size income statement (2004-05 & 2005-06)

Inference:

The common size income statement for the year 2005 to 2006 reveals

the following. The sales figure increasing year after year. In the year 2005-

06, cost of sales is 38.34% of the total income. Administrative and other

expenses are fluctuating. Even though the sales increased but there is heavy

decrease in the net profit of the organization. The net profit slashed from

4.80% to 0.12% only. The company must adopt correct pricing and control

the unnecessary expenses to attain high profits

Particulars 2004-2005 % 2005-2006 %

Income:

Sales 173,896,783 88.16 179,231,321 86.92

Other income 22,257,266 11.28 19,961,865 9.68

Closing stock 1,109,500 0.56 7,021,983 3.40

Total income 197,263,548 100 206,215,169 100

Expenditure:

Opening stock 1,033,090 0.52 1,109,500 0.53Purchases 110,670,457 56.10 81,132,703 39.34

Direct expenses 47,140,653 23.92 79,064,698 38.34

Administration expenses 18,864,268 9.56 24,545,865 11.90Selling Expenses 9,432,134 4.78 12,272,932 5.95

Depreciation 650368 0.32 7,858,427 3.82

Total expenses 187,640,021 95.20 205,984,125 99.88

Net profit 9,472,578 4.80 231,044

0.12Total 197,263,548 100 206,215,169 100


75/101

- 68 -

TABLE-17


Particulars 2005-2006 % 2006-2007 %

Income:

Sales 179,231,321 86.92 225,250,870 88.22

Other income 19,961,865 9.68 9,908,254 3.88

Closing stock 7,021,983 3.40 20,177,353 7.90

Total income 206,215,169 100 255,336,477 100

Expenditure:

Opening stock 1,109,500 0.53 7,021,983 2.75

Purchases 81,132,703 39.34 105,677,583 41.38

Direct expenses 79,064,698 38.34 103,428,867 40.50

Administration expenses 24,545,865 11.90 22,308,545 8.76


Depreciation 7,858,427 3.82 5,123,740 2.00

Total expenses 205,984,125 99.88 254,714,990 99.75

Net profit 231,044 0.12 621,487 0.25

Total 206,215,169 100 255,336,477 100

Inference:

The common size income statement for the year 2006 to 2007 reveals

the following. The sales figure increased from Rs.179,231,321 to

Rs.225,250,870. In the year 2006-07 cost of sales is 40.50%. There is heavy

decrease in the other incomes. In the year 2006-07 income increased from

Rs.231,044 to Rs.621,487.


76/101

- 69 -

TABLE-18


Inference:The common size income statement for the year 2007 to 2008

reveals the following. The sales figure slashed down very. It decreased from

Rs.225,250,870 to Rs.113,095,288 which is almost 50% of the previous

year. In the year 2007-08 cost of sales is 37.82%. However in

Administrative and other expenses there was a negligible change due to

which organization attained a loss of Rs.26716.

Particulars 2006-2007 % 2007-2008

%Income:

Sales 225,250,870 88.22 113,095,288 75.74

Other income 9,908,254 3.88 26,032,716 17.46

Closing stock 20,177,353 7.90 10,154,926 6.80

Total income 255,336,477 100 149,309,646 100

Expenditure:

Opening stock 7,021,983 2.75 20,177,353 13.52

Purchases 105,677,583 41.38 39,032,353 26.14

Direct expenses 103,428,867 40.50 56,462,413 37.82

Administrationexpenses

22,308,545 8.76 19,570,521 13.10


Depreciation 5,123,740 2.00 4,308,462 2.88

Total expenses 254,714,990 99.75 149,336,362 100.01

Net profit 621,487 0.25 (26716) (0.01)

Total 255,336,477 100 149,309,646 100


77/101

- 70 -

TABLE-19

Common size balance sheet (2003-04 & 2004-05)

Inference:

The common size balance sheet for the year 2004-2005 is as follows:

Share capital of the company is decreasing in %age of the net worth. In

2002-2003 in 70.55% to 44.96%.Secured loan for the company has

decreasing trend. It increases 28.43 to 46.42% of the net worth of the

company. Fixed asset of the company is decreasing in this year from 52.92%

to 42.59%. Current liability and provisions is decreasing 37.48% to 24.05 %.

Particulars 2003-2004 % 2004-2005 %Sources of funds:Share capital 52,599,867 70.55 53,371,716 44.96

Reserves & surplus 731,825 0.98 10,204,403 8.60

Loan funds:Secured loan 21,197,278 28.43 55,103,092 46.42

Unsecured loan 22,805 0.04 22,805 0.02

Total 74,551,775 100 118,702,016 100Application of funds:

Fixed assets 39,262,748 52.67 50,550,586 42.59

Current assets & Loan andadvancesCash & bank 1,002,474 1.34 1,490,466 1.26

Sundry debtors 42,435,207 56.92 63,785,212 53.74

Advances and deposits 18,761,523 25.17 30,308,234 25.53

Investments ---------- ----- 6,000 0.01

Other assets 1,033,090 1.39 1,109,500 0.93

Total 63,232,294 84.82 96,699,412 81.46

current liabilities &provisions:

Less: Current liabilities 19,725,023 26.46 25,486,282 21.47

Expenses for provisions 8,218,245 11.02 3,061,700 2.58

Net Current assets 35,289,026 47.33 68,151,430 57.41Total 74,551,775 100 118,702,016 100


78/101

- 71 -

TABLE-20


Inference:The common size balance sheet for the year 2005 to 2006 is as

follows:

Share capital of the company has increased from 44.96% to 51.97. Secured loan

for the company has decreasing trend. It increases 46.42% to 38.24%.Unsecured

loan of the company has been paid off. Fixed asset of the company is decreasing in

this year of 42.59% to 39.20%. Current liability and a provision is decreasing

24.05% to 21.71%.

Particulars 2004-2005 % 2005-2006 %

Sources of funds:Share capital 53,371,716 44.96 55,375,152 51.97

Reserves & surplus 10,204,403 8.60 10,435,447 9.79


Unsecured loan 22,805 0.02 ------ -----


Fixed assets 50,550,586 42.59 41,772,389 39.20Current assets & Loan and

advances

Cash & bank 1,490,466 1.26 326,232 0.31Sundry debtors 63,785,212 53.74 58,873,736 55..25


Investments 6,000 0.01 6,000 0.01

Other assets 1,109,500 0.93 7,021,983 6.59

Total 96,699,412 81.46 78,204,998 82.50

current liabilities & provisions:



Net Current assets 68,151,430 57.41 64,780,024 60.80

Total 118,702,016 100 106,552,413 100


79/101

- 72 -

TABLE-21


Inference:

The common size balance sheet for the year 2006 to 2007 is as

follows:

Share capital figure remained constant however their %age to net worth has

increased from 51.97% to 56.12%. Some amount of the secured loans has been

paid off. Fixed asset of the company has been increased and there share is 65.86%

to the total assets in the year 2006-07. Current liability and a provision is

increasing 21.71% to 65.37%. It can be noticed that the fixed assets are purchased

on credit from the creditors and they both increased.

Particulars 2005-2006 % 2006-2007 %Sources of funds:

Share capital 55,375,152 51.97 55,375,152 56.12



Unsecured loan ------ ----- 25,500 0.02


Fixed assets 41,772,389 39.20 64,982,465 65.86

Current assets & Loan and advanc

Cash & bank 326,232 0.31 1,573,364 1.59

Sundry debtors 58,873,736 55..25 67,142,698 68.05


Investments 6,000 0.01 6,000 0.01

Other assets 7,021,983 6.59 20,177,353 20.45

Total Current Assets 78,204,998 82.50 98,197,393 99.52

current liabilities & provisions:Less: Current liabilities 19,777,355 18.56 54,707,520 55.44

Expenses for provisions 3,351,241 3.15 9,802,232 9.93Net Current assets 64,780,024 60.80 33,687,641 34.14

Total 106,552,413 100 98,670,106 100


80/101

- 73 -

TABLE-22Common size balance sheet (2006-07 & 2007-08)

Inference:

The common size balance sheet for the year 2007 to 2008 is as

follows:

Share capital figure remained constant however their %age to net worth has

increased from 56.12% to 60.41%. Some amount of the secured loans has been

paid off. Current liability and a provision is decreased from 65.37% to 21.03%

this means that a heavy amount is paid to the creditors of the fixed assets.

Particulars 2006-2007 % 2007-2008 %

Sources of funds:

Share capital 55,375,152 56.12 55,375,152 60.41


Loan funds:

Secured loan 32,212,520 32.65 25,236,103 27.53

Unsecured loan 25,500 0.02 19,500 0.03

Total 98,670,106 100 91,660,973 100

Application of funds:

Fixed assets 64,982,465 65.86 54,908,412 59.90Current assets & Loan and

advancesCash & bank 1,573,364 1.59 260,095 0.28

Sundry debtors 67,142,698 68.05 41,001,210 44.73


Investments 6,000 0.01 -------- -----

Other assets 20,177,353 20.45 10,154,926 11.08

Total 98,197,393 99.52 56,028,561 61.13

current liabilities &

provisions:



Net Current assets 33,687,641 34.14 36,752,561 40.10

Total 98,670,106 100 91,660,973 100


81/101

- 74 -

TABLE-23

Comparative income statement (2003-04 & 2004-05)

Inference:

The sales level has increased 2004 to 2005 in 2.86%.Other income of

the company has increased in 19.98%. The stock differential of the firm in the

year of 2003 to 2004 is 7.40%.The operating expenses is increased by 19.57%

in both administration and selling and the net profit of the year is decreased by

11.47%

Particulars 2003-2004 2004-2005 INC/DCE %

Income:

Sales 169,056,118 173,896,7834840665.00 2.86

Other income 18,550,813 22,257,2663706453.00 19.98

Closing stock 1,033,090 1,109,50076410.00 7.40

Total income 188,640,021 197,263,5488623527.00 4.57

Expenditure:

Opening stock 7,340,630 1,033,090(6307540.00) (85.93)

Purchases 90,966,622 110,670,45719703835.00 21.66

Direct expenses 49,888,961 47,140,653(2748308.00) (5.51)


15,776,297 18,864,2683087971.00 19.57

Selling Expenses 7,888,149 9,432,1341543985.00 19.57

Depreciation 6,079,468 650368

(5429100.00) (89.30)Total expenses 177,940,127 187,640,0219699894.00 5.45

Net profit /Loss 10,699,894 9,472,578(1227316.00) (11.47)

Total 188,640,894 197,263,5488622654.00 4.57


82/101


83/101

- 76 -

TABLE-25


Inference:

The sales level has increased 2006 to 2007 in 25.68% .Other

income of the company has decreased by 50.36%. The stock differential of the

firm in the year of 2006 to 2007 is increased. The operating expenses are

decreased in 9.11% in both administration and selling and the net profit of the

year is increased.

Particulars 2005-2006 2006-2007 INC /DEC %

Income:

Sales 179,231,321 225,250,87046019549.00 25.68

Other income 19,961,865 9,908,254(10053611.00) (50.36)

Closing stock 7,021,983 20,177,35313155370.00 187.35

Total income 206,215,169 255,336,477 49121308.00 23.82Expenditure:

Opening stock 1,109,500 7,021,9835912483.00 532.90

Purchases 81,132,703 105,677,58324544880.00 30.25

Direct expenses 79,064,698 103,428,86724364169.00 30.82


24,545,865 22,308,545

(2237320.00) (9.11)Selling Expenses 12,272,932 11,154,272

(1118660.00) (9.11)Depreciation 7,858,427 5,123,740

(2734687.00) (34.80)Total expenses 205,984,125 254,714,990

48730865.00 23.66Net profit /Loss 231,044 621,487

390443.00 168.99Total 206,215,169 255,336,477

49121308.00 23.82


84/101

- 77 -

TABLE-26


Particulars 2006-2007 2007-2008 INC / DEC %

Income:

Sales 225,250,870 113,095,288(112155582.00) (49.79)

Other income 9,908,254 26,032,71616124462.00 162.74

Closing stock 20,177,353 10,154,926(10022427.00) (49.67)

Total income 255,336,477 149,309,646(106026831.00) (41.52)

Expenditure:

Opening stock 7,021,983 20,177,35313155370.00 187.35

Purchases 105,677,583 39,032,353(66645230.00) (63.06)

Direct expenses 103,428,867 56,462,413(46966454.00) (45.41)


22,308,545 19,570,521(2738024.00) (12.27)

Selling Expenses 11,154,272 9,785,260(1369012.00) (12.27)

Depreciation 5,123,740 4,308,462 (815278.00) (15.91)

Total expenses 254,714,990 149,336,362(105378628.00) (41.37)

Net profit /Loss 621,487 (26716)(648203.00) (104.30)

Total 255,336,477 149,309,646(106026831.00) (41.52)

Inference:

The sales level has slashed down by 49.79% when compared to last

year sales .Other income of the company has increased. The stock differential

of the firm in the year of 2007 to 2008 also decreased. The operating expense

is decreased in 12.27% in both administration and selling. The company

incurred a net loss of Rs.26716.


85/101

- 78 -

TABLE-27Comparative balance sheet (2003-04 & 2004-05)


Sources of funds:Share capital 52,599,867 53,371,716 771,849 1.47

Reserves & surplus 731,825 10,204,403 9,472,578 1294.38

Loan funds:Secured loan 21,197,278 55,103,092 33,905,814 159.95

Unsecured loan 22,805 22,805

Total 74,551,775 118,702,016 44,150,241 59.22Application of funds:

Fixed assets 39,262,748 50,550,586 11,287,838 28.75Current assets & Loan an

advancesCash & bank 1,002,474 1,490,466 487,992 48.68Sundry debtors 42,435,207 63,785,212 21,350,005 50.31

Advances and deposits 18,761,523 30,308,234 11,546,711 61.54

Investments ---------- 6,000 6,000 100.00

Other assets 1,033,090 1,109,500 76,410 7.40

Total 63,232,294 96,699,412 33,467,118 52.93


Less: Current liabilities 19,725,023 25,486,282 5,761,259 29.21

Expenses for provisions 8,218,245 3,061,700 -5,156,545 -62.75

Net Current assets 35,289,026 68,151,430 32,862,404 93.12Total 74,551,775 118,702,016 44,150,241 59.22

Inference:

The comparative balance sheet of the year 2004-2005 is as follows

The share capital of the company has increasing in the year of 2004-05 by

1.47%. The profit of the company has increased the reserves and surplus by

1295% .The fixed assets of the company has increased in 28.75%. The cash

position of the company has fluctuating increase or decreases. The current

liability and provisions of the company is fluctuating year after year.


86/101

- 79 -


Inference:

The comparative balance sheet of the year 2005 to 2006 is as follows

The share capital of the company has increasing in the year of 2005-06. The

secured loan of the company has decreased in this year by 26.06% .The fixed

assets of the company has decreased. The cash position of the company has

fluctuating increase or decreases. The current liability and provisions of the

company is fluctuating year after year.


Sources of funds:Share capital 53,371,716 55,375,152 2,003,436 3.75

Reserves & surplus 10,204,403 10,435,447 231,044 2.26

Loan funds:Secured loan 55,103,092 40,741,814 -14,361,278 -26.06

Unsecured loan 22,805 ------ -22,805 -100.00

Total 118,702,016 106,552,413 -12,149,603 -10.24Application of funds:

Fixed assets 50,550,586 41,772,389 -8,778,197 -17.37Current assets & Loan and

advancesCash & bank 1,490,466 326,232 -1,164,234 -78.11

Sundry debtors 63,785,212 58,873,736 -4,911,476 -7.70

Advances and deposits 30,308,234 21,680,669 -8,627,565 -28.47

Investments 6,000 6,000 0 0.00

Other assets 1,109,500 7,021,983 5,912,483 532.90

Total 96,699,412 78,204,998 -18,494,414 -19.13


Less: Current liabilities 25,486,282 19,777,355 -5,708,927 -22.40

Expenses for provisions 3,061,700 3,351,241 289,541 9.46Net Current assets 68,151,430 64,780,024 -3,371,406 -4.95

Total 118,702,016 106,552,413 -12,149,603 -10.24


87/101

- 80 -


Inference:

The comparative balance sheet of the year 2005-2006 is as follows

The share capital of the company remains same. The secured loan of the

company has decreased in this year by 20.93% .The fixed assets of the

company has increased by purchasing the new assets on credit. The cash

position of the company has fluctuating increase or decreases. The current

liability and provisions of the company is also increasing as the fixed assets

were purchased on credit and hence they both increases.

Particulars 2005-2006 2006-2007 INC / DEC %Sources of funds:

Share capital 55,375,152 55,375,152 0 0.00

Reserves & surplus 10,435,447 11,056,934 621,487 5.96


Unsecured loan ------ 25,500 25,500 100.00


Fixed assets 41,772,389 64,982,465 23,210,076 55.56Current assets & Loan

and advances

Cash & bank 326,232 1,573,364 1,247,132 382.28Sundry debtors 58,873,736 67,142,698 8,268,962 14.05

Advances and deposits 21,680,669 9,297,978 -12,382,691 -57.11

Investments 6,000 6,000 0 0.00

Other assets 7,021,983 20,177,353 13,155,370 187.35

Total 78,204,998 98,197,393 19,992,395 25.56


Less: Current liabilities 19,777,355 54,707,520 34,930,165 176.62

Expenses for provisions 3,351,241 9,802,232 6,450,991 192.50

Net Current assets 64,780,024 33,687,641 -31,092,383 -48.00

Total 106,552,413 98,670,106 -7,882,307 -7.40


88/101

- 81 -


Inference:

The comparative balance sheet of the year 2007 to 2008 is as followsThe share capital of the company remains same. The secured loan of the

company has decreased in this year .The fixed assets of the company has

decreased. The cash position of the company has fluctuating increase or

decreases. Large amount to the creditors has been paid off during the year.

Particulars 2006-2007 2007-2008 INC / DEC %Sources of funds:

Share capital 55,375,152 55,375,152 0 0.00

Reserves & surplus 11,056,934 11,030,218-26,716 -0.24


Unsecured loan 25,500 19,500 -6,000 -23.53


Fixed assets 64,982,465 54,908,412 -10,074,053 -15.50Current assets & Loa

and advancesCash & bank 1,573,364 260,095 -1,313,269 -83.47

Sundry debtors 67,142,698 41,001,210 -26,141,488 -38.93

Advances and deposits 9,297,978 4,612,330-4,685,648 -50.39

Investments 6,000 -------- -6,000 -100.00

Other assets 20,177,353 10,154,926 -10,022,427 -49.67

Total 98,197,393 56,028,561 -42,168,832 -42.94

current liabilities &

provisions:Less: Current

liabilities54,707,520 15,919,410

-38,788,110 -70.90

Expenses forprovisions

9,802,232 3,356,590-6,445,642 -65.76

Net Current assets 33,687,641 36,752,561 3,064,920 9.10Total 98,670,106 91,660,973 -7,009,133 -7.10

7/31/2019 Vijay T

Documents

Vijay Textiles