WeatherNews Routing Service Brochure

What can WNI do for your business?

Oct‐24th 2012

Pacific Ocean

Good Weather DefinitionW H i h 1 2 [ ] ( SS 3)

80%

90%

100%Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)

40%

50%

60%

70%

Bad Wx

Oakland to Hong Kong６０５０NM６５００NM

10%

20%

30%

40%Good Wx

６５００NM

Data Sampling Position: D t S li P i d 0%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month

Data Sampling Period:Jan‐01/2009 ‐ Dec‐31/2011

Atlantic Ocean

Good Weather DefinitionWave Height < 1 25[m] (DSS 3)

80%

90%

100%

Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)

50%

60%

70%

80%

Bad Wx

Rotterdam to New York３４００NM３５００NM

10%

20%

30%

40%Bad Wx

Good Wx３５００NM


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month


1. Optimum Ship Routeing (OSR)

Optimum Speed?Optimum Speed?

h d ff ( d f )• Every ship is different (Every Voyage is deferent)• You need to set speed (RPM) • Someone needs to monitor (Target Management)• Ship to shore clear reporting procedure with MT.Ship to shore clear reporting procedure with MT. • Least Cost (Fuel Consumption, +/‐ En route time)


Optimum Speed?FIXED INSTRUCTION ( Speed / RPM )

Optimum Speed?

1. Operator’s INSTRUCTION (Full/Eco/MCR%) for each business priority.(least time or least fuel or on‐time.)

2 Master’s NAVIGATION with or without weather routing2. Master s NAVIGATION with or without weather routing

FLEXIBLE INSTRUCTION ( Speed / RPM Allocation ) = OSR Route and RPM Optimization

1. Operator’s BUSINESS PRIORITY (Least time, Least fuel, On‐time) by realistic VOYAGE COMPARISON of OSR.

2 VOYAGE PLANNING (R t /RPM/FOC) f hi t t k fi d2. VOYAGE PLANNING (Route/RPM/FOC) for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization

3. Voyage and daily TARGET MANAGEMENT.


1 Voyage Comparison for your prioritization1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization (Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)

2. Voyage Planning for ship master3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)3. Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)4. Asset Management ( Voyage evaluation / Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )

Plan

Do

SSee

2. OSR Core Value

1. Voyage Comparison for Operator’s decision2. Voyage Planning for Master’s navigation

Voyage Comparison

• Least Time

Voyage Planning

• Route• Least – Time• On – Time (RTA) • Least Fuel

• Route • RPM • En route time

• Least – Cost• Safety First

• FOC • Natural/Social Hazard

2. OSR Core Value (PLAN: Voyage Comparison)

1 Vo age Comparison for o r b siness priorit1. Voyage Comparison for your business priority (Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)

2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization/ / /3. Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)

4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )

2. OSR Core Value (PLAN: Voyage Comparison)

1. Weather prediction/Calculated performance by text

2. Weather forecast by Graph 3. Performance prediction by Graph

2. OSR Core Value (Do: Voyage Planning)1. Voyage Comparison for your business priority y g p y p y

(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)3. Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )

2. OSR Core Value (Do: Voyage Planning)1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g p y p

(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)3. Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )

2. OSR Core Value ( See : Performance monitoring )1. Voyage Comparison for your business priority y g p y p y

(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization 3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)3. Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )

2. OSR Core Value ( See : Performance monitoring )1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g p y p


2. OSR Core Value (See : Performance Evaluation) 1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g p y p


2. OSR Core Value (See : Performance Evaluation) 1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g p y p


2. OSR Core Value (See: Performance Evaluation) 1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g p y p


3. Case Study

Clarification

<1> Route OptimizationSupport for Quickest Arrival Voyage against heavy Wx

<2> RTA OptimizationSupport for RTA Adjustment in speed control

<3> RPM OptimizationSupport for Least fuel with constant RPM

<4> Speed AllocationSupport for Least fuel with Speed control during heavy Wx

<5> Current/Tidal EffectSupport for Least fuel in use of effect of Tidal/Ocean Current

1717

3. Case Study (Cape)

<1> Route Optimization<2> RTA Optimization<3> RPM Optimization

/ d l ff<5> Current/Tidal Effect

1 Master set RPM 70 as Eco Speed(A)1. Master set RPM 70 as Eco Speed2. WNI Suggested RPM 62 for fuel saving

(B)

1. WNI suggested route for better current2. Master followed our new route.

(A) Fuel Savings due to RPM Optimization ：153MT(B) Fuel Savings due to Route Optimization ： 6MT(B) Fuel Savings due to Route Optimization ： 6MT

Total Estimated Fuel Savings : 159MT

18

3. Case Study (Panamax)

<1> Route Optimization<2> Speed Allocation<3> Current/Tidal Effect

Effect of Ocean Curret “Kuroshio”Effect of Ocean Curret Kuroshio

19Total Estimated Fuel Savings : 33MT

3. Case Study (Tanker)

<2> RTA O ti i ti Fuel Saved: 38MT

Departure : NW Australia (11/27) Voyage Planning Sheet was quickly updated as

<2> RTA Optimization<3> RPM Optimization

pArrival : Brisbane (12/09) per RTA (Required Time of Arrival) change

advised by operator after discussing with consignee to take second tidal window to save f l d till t fi i tfuel and still meet refinery requirements.Master cooperated in adjusting speed.

20

3. Case Study (Container)

<1> Route Optimization

Dep: BALBOA / Mar‐06thArr : TAIPEI / Mar‐29th


‐ Diversion for Safety to avoid heavy wxAdded 138 miles but saved 89mt FO‐ Added 138 miles but saved 89mt FO

‐ Master followed route by good 3‐way‐communication

Save 89MT

3. Case Study (PCTC)


Dep: IRAGO / June‐17thArr : BALBOA / July‐6th


‐ Master’s route 7991nm/789mt WNI’s Suggested 7886nm/781mt

Save 8MT

‐ WNI s Suggested 7886nm/781mt‐ followed route by good 3‐way‐communication

Save 8MT

Sug

4. EXSITE Voyage

Daily performance Monitoring

4. EXSITE Voyage

Target Management

4. EXSITE Voyage

Performance E al ation /Asset ManagementPerformance Evaluation /Asset Management

5. Where we are now, and where we are going ?

Data base marketing

PerformancePerformanceDemonstrated Ship performance ranking DB (Low performer / High performer)

FleetOptimal Fleet deploymentL M t (P f M t)Loop Management (Proforma Management) Asset management

BusinessAnnual business (Fleet) planning Business Planning ( Cost Management )Leg voyage(Loop/Round) annual fleet planning

Pacific Ocean

Good Weather DefinitionW H i h 1 2 [ ] ( SS 3)

80%

90%

100%Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)

40%

50%

60%

70%

Bad Wx

Oakland to Hong Kong６０５０NM６５００NM

10%

20%

30%

40%Good Wx

６５００NM


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month


Atlantic Ocean

Good Weather DefinitionWave Height < 1 25[m] (DSS 3)

80%

90%

100%

Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)

50%

60%

70%

80%

Bad Wx

Rotterdam to New York３４００NM３５００NM

10%

20%

30%

40%Bad Wx

Good Wx３５００NM


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month


6. Capability

Global Center Amsterdam Center Oklahoma Center

Japan Euro U.S.

Documents

WeatherNews Routing Service Brochure