28
International Telecommunication Union What is Next after Next Generation Networks Marco Carugi ITU-T SG13 WP2 co-chair and Q.3/13 Rapporteur Senior Advisor, Nortel Networks, FRANCE [email protected] Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 ITU-D Regional Development Forum for the Asia Pacific Region “NGN and Broadband, Opportunities and Challenges” Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27 – 29 July 2009

What is Next after Next Generation Networks Smart Card Telematics, Navigation Device Ubiquitous Networking Database, Web, application server Medical Device Camera Humans with Attached

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

InternationalTelecommunicationUnion

What is Next after Next Generation Networks

Marco CarugiITU-T SG13 WP2 co-chair and

Q.3/13 Rapporteur Senior Advisor, Nortel Networks, FRANCE

[email protected]

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009

ITU-D Regional Development Forum for the Asia Pacific Region

“NGN and Broadband, Opportunities and Challenges” Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27 – 29 July 2009

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 2

Outline

o NGN standardization status

o Future directions in NGN standardization• Vision and goals• Evolving the NGN: some challenges and

requirements

o Towards the networks of the future • Worldwide initiatives• ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks

NOTE: The focus of this presentation is on ongoing and planned activities within ITU-T

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 3

NGN standardization status

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 4

Release2

Early 2006 ~ mid 2008ETSI TISPAN

2003 2005 2006 2007 2008-9 2004

End of 2003~early 2006

Release1

Structure

NGN Service requirements and architecture

SG13

NGN Signaling protocols

SG11

Release 1 Release 2

ITU-T (NGN GSI)FG-IPTV(2006/4-2007/11)

Signalingprotocols

FG-NGN(2004/5-2005/12)

Concept

▲NGNWorkshop(Jul. 2003)

3GPP~ end of 2004

Release 6

~ mid 2007

Release 7

~ end of 2008

Release 8

IETF ▲SIP standard RFC3261(Jun. 2002)

Common IMS

• 13 ITU-T Recommendations on NGN basic concepts published in July 2006• ITU-T NGN Release 1 practically completed in January 2008 • More advanced services/features (IPTV, FMC etc.) currently under discussion

ITU-T NGN standardization timeline

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 5

o Fundamental functions of NGN Ref. Arch.[Y.2012] almost completed

o Basic specifications for “Managed” IP delivery (QoS, security) and mobility support

Tra n sp ort stra tum

Serv ice stra tu m

Contro lM ed ia

Man

agem

ent

Func

tions

M anagem ent

A N I

Transport Contro l Function s

R esource and Adm iss ion

Con tro l Function s

Network A ttachm entContro l Function s

Network A ttachm entContro l Function s

N N IU N I

A pp lica tion S uppo rt F unctions & S erv ice S uppo rt F unctions

A pp lica tions

T ransport F unctions

E nd-U serF u nctions

O therN e tw orks

S e rv ice C ontro lF unc tions

Service U serProfile s

Service U serProfile s

Transport User Profile s

Transport User Profile s

Status of NGN standards development

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 6

LegacyTerminals

LegacyTerminals

Transport Stratum

Service Stratum

End-UserFunctions

Application Functions

Core transport Functions

NGNTerminals

Customer Networks

Other N

etworks

Application Support Functions andService Support Functions (ASF&SSF)

Core TransportFunctions

Other N

etworks

EdgeFunctions

Access Transport Functions

ServiceControl

Functions

Network Access

Attachment Functions

Network Attachment Control Functions

(NACF)

Access NetworkFunctions

Resource and AdmissionControl Functions

(RACF)User

ProfileFunctions

T. UserProfileFunctions

GWGW

Other NGN ServiceComponents

PSTN/ISDN EmulationService Component

IP Multimedia Component&PSTN/ISDN Simulation

IP MultimediaService Component

S. UserProfile

Functions

GWGW

Applications

Re-use and adaptation of 3GPP IMS to

provide multimedia

services (Y.2021)

A unified IP network with improved

security and QoS(Y.2111)

"Service platform" for agile and rich service provisioning

Evolution scenario of PSTN and short-term

solution (Y.2031)

NGN components

Broadband access able to support high

bandwidth service demands

A variety of mobile and fixed terminals

and their profile management

Network attachment

(Y.2014)

Border gateways enabling secure

interworking

IPTV (Y.1910)

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 7

Future directions in NGN standardization

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 8

Overall future directions

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 9

“Convergence” is a key goal of the future

Future should direct to “Convergence”• Vision is “Any Time, Any Where, Any Services and

Any Devices”• Towards Any services over Any transport

infrastructures

Convergence • Internal to an industry (e.g. FMC, IPTV)• Among different industries (e.g. Telematics/ITS, USN, e-Health, etc.)

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 10

•Always on with Any devices•Anytime, anywhere and in Any form•Voice and multimedia•Self service, intuitive•Simple for the end user•Secure, trusted and reliable

Services at “Convergence” time

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 11

Limited BB

BE IP

Limited Services

NGN

Converged Broadband

Managed IP

FMC RFID IPTV Others

Business/Application oriented projects

• Simple business relationships• Simple players

• Diverse business models and flexible businessrelationships

• Diverse players

NGN as enabler for Convergence

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 12

“Ubiquitous Networking”

o Enabling “Any Service, Any Time, Any Where, Any Device” operations via enhanced NGN capabilities

o Support of human-to-human, but also human-to-machine and machine-to-machine communications

NGN

PC

Human-to-Human Communication

Human-to-Object Communication

Human-to-Object Communication

Object-to-Object Communication

PDA

Wearable PC

Mobile Phone

Home Electronics

VehicleRFID tag

SensorsTV

Smart Card Telematics,

Navigation Device

Ubiquitous Networking

Database, Web,

application server

Medical Device

Camera

Humanswith

Attached Devices

Objects (Remote Monitoring and

Information Devices)

Home server, gateway

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 13

Transport stratum

Service stratum

ControlMedia

Man

agem

ent

Func

tions

Management

ANI

Transport Control Functions

Resource and Admission

Control Functions

Network AttachmentControl Functions

Network AttachmentControl Functions

NNIUNI

Application Support Functions & Service Support Functions

Applications

Transport Functions

End-UserFunctions

OtherNetworks

Service ControlFunctions

Service UserProfiles

Service UserProfiles

Transport User Profiles

Transport User Profiles

NACF 1 (Nomadism)NACF 2 (Handover)

RACF 1 (Nomadism)RACF 2 (Streaming Mode)

CDF

VOICE

VIDEO

WEB

U S N

R F I D

M D S

IdM (IdentityManagement)

FMCX-castingIPv6 based

UbiquitousNetworking

Ubiquitous Services/Applications

IPTVOpen Services

FutureNetwor ks (?)

Enhancing/Evolving the NGN components

o Based on ongoing and future working directions of new ITU-T SG13 “Future networks including mobile and NGN”

Open Env

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 14

Future FMC Mobile

Requirements

Architectures

QoS and Security

Mobility

Fixed

• NGN• IPTV• Open Environment• Web based• USN/RFID• Ubiquitous Networking• Climate Change• Others

Infrastructural Frameworks

Another high level representation of ongoing and future SG13 study areas

Technical areas

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 15

o The NGN infrastructure needs enhancements in order to support a larger set of applications and business scenarios• Telco oriented services (such as Voice, Data and Video streaming),

as well as dynamic Information services (e.g. WS, P2P, USN)• Customized/personalized services using advanced capabilities in

service delivery and control (e.g. context awareness)• 3rd Party Providers’ apps/scenarios, User created apps,

Interconnect scenarios with Home Networks & Enterprise Networks • Composite applications “mashing-up” capabilities from different

domains (Telecom/IMS, Internet/Web 2.0, Content) -> NGN service platform

• Applications over NGN integrated with other industries such as Transport Systems, Robotics, Health, Education etc.

o Also, current standards generally lack of clear indication on how these should be used for support of specific application scenarios• E.g. more study required on service delivery and control (IPTV etc.)

The evolved NGN will have to support a larger set of applications and business scenarios

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 16

o Support of Convergence o FMC capabilities don’t provide full service level supporto More detailed developments are necessary (e.g. support of seamless handover with what service and what level)

o Support of Composite serviceso Mechanisms are required for service delivery across different

domains, including for Service Quality Mgt and Policy Mgto Accessibility of enablers to third partieso Orchestration of common service functions

o Identity Management features completeness o Integrated Identity Processing (across identity domains), standards

for interoperability and User control of Personal Ident. Info (PII)o Policy management consistency

o Required across access technologies, across Service and Transport o Support of Multi-domain/multi-network services

o More work required on Security, QoS, User profiles, Content Mgt, Interconnection etc.

Standardization of NGN capabilities: some challenges

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 17

o Integration of new technologies with NGN o P2P (Q.19/13 DSN), Grid, etc.

o Integration of social requirementso Environmental sustainability, accessibility

o Interoperabilityo Promotion of interoperability is required developing mechanisms

which facilitate it o IMS-based NGN

o It is needed to ensure the value proposition of IMS-based NGN for providers and users (e.g. integrating IMS assets in a NGN service platform)

o Migration to NGNo More work is required to identify best “common” practices for

migration towards identified target NGN configurations

Other NGN challenges

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 18

Towards the networks of the future

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 19

Worldwide research initiatives on Future Networks – some relevant examples

Japan

AKARI/NwGNo Architecture development project o R&D on evaluation and establishment

in the structure of NwGN; R&D for dynamic network technology

o NICT’s Testbed network for research development

Koreao Future Internet Forum (FIF)o PG220 (TTA) o ETRI project for Virtualized

Programmable Platform for FN research and experimentation

ChinaCNGIo China’s Next Generation Internet

project

United States

FINDo NSF’s ambitious program to

develop the future Internet architecture through a clean slate approach.

o Small scale, but a large number of projects converge into a fewer number of full scale architectures

o To verify using GENI

GENIo Aimed at developing a

testbed organization to succeed Planet Lab’s development. programmable

o Aimed at a large scale facility development’s budget in NSF, with international cooperation also included as a target

EuropeanCommunity

FP7/FIREo FP7 is EC’s funding

structure for science and technology

o FIRE: Future Internet Research and Experimentation

o FIRE’s goal is to build a dynamic, sustainable, large scale European Experimental Facility

GEANTo EC’s research networko Upgrading and greater

capacity in its third term (GEANT3)

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 20

o The title of SG13 in the new study period (2009-2012) is “Future Networks including Mobile and NGN” reflecting the importance of “Future Networks”

o A specific new Question on Future Networks has been approved as Q21/13o Future Networks have become part of the global agenda: national and regional

initiatives (US, EU, China, Japan, Korea), as well as international ones (IRTF and, more recently, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6)

o The academic community expressed strong interest in collaborating with the ITU-T on this subject during the ITU-T Kaleidoscope May 2008 event

o However, all ongoing activities seem to be in an early stage of investigation/development

o Global harmonization among all these different activities is important and essential to build up globally interoperable future ICT infrastructures

o ITU-T intends to make all efforts to support the development of global and harmonized frameworks (e.g. requirements, functional architectures and protocols) collaborating with all relevant worldwide organizations/projects/FN communities

o Initial collaboration items (in progress) include • Collection and identification of various visions of future networks from relevant

organizations/projects• Establishment of a shared roadmap of standardization for Future Networks

Background and rationale of FG-FN creation

The ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks (FG-FN) (established in Jan 09) – 1

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 21

The Focus Group, by collaborating with worldwide future network (FN) communities (e.g., research institutes, forums, academia and etc), aims to• collect and identify visions of future networks, based

on new technologies • assess the interactions between future networks and

new services • familiarize ITU-T and standardization communities with

emerging attributes of future networks • encourage collaboration between ITU-T and FN

communities

Scope of FG-FN

The ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks – 2

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 22

The main objective of the Focus Group is to document results that would be helpful for developing Recommendations for Future Networks.

To achieve this objective the Focus Group will:

• gather new ideas relevant to Future Networks and identify potential study areas on Future Networks

• describe visions of Future Networks• identify a timeframe of Future Networks• identify potential impacts on standards development • suggest future ITU-T study items and related actions

Objectives of FG-FN

The ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks – 3

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 23

o Review related research and standardization activities;

o Based on this review, produce the following deliverables:

• Future network benefits• Future network vision• High-level description of Future Networks

attributes• Vocabulary

Specific FG-FN tasks and deliverables

The ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks – 4

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 24

An initial (DRAFT) definition of ‘Future Networks’ developed by Q.21/13 :

[Note: the clean-slate approach is understood as a designprinciple, not as deployment one]

o Future Network (FN) is a network which is able to provide revolutionary services, capabilities, and facilities that are hard to provide using existing network technologies.Note: FN provides mechanisms that benefit every participant as much as they contribute. It will be studied based on clean-slate approaches.

Real revolution or evolution (even if more stepsReal revolution or evolution (even if more stepsforward) of existing networks (NGN, Internet and NGN) ?forward) of existing networks (NGN, Internet and NGN) ?

Initial thinking on Future Networks study

The ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks – 5

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 25

May 2009 Q.21/13 meeting+June 29-July 3 first FG-FN meetingTable of Contents o 1. Scope o 2. Motivation of Future Networkso 2.1 Needs to research and standardize the Future Networkso 2.2 Value and Vision of Future Networkso 3 Definition, General Concept and Terminologieso 3.1 Definition o 3.2 General Concept and Terminologies o 4. Problem Statement o 5 New Design Goals and General Requirements o 6 Services and Applications in Future Networkso 7. Milestone for Standardization on Future Networkso 8. Conclusionso Annex A : Gap Analysiso Bibliography

Multiple different views from parties involved in first FG-FN meeting !

Start of first FG-FN deliverable “Future Networks : Vision, Concept, and Requirements”

The ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks – 6

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 26

o Combination of Packet-switching and circuit-switchingo Separate structure for location and identificationo New naming and discovery schemeso Cross-layered architecture and control o Network virtualization, programmability, overlayso Autonomic control and self-management solutions o Security and reliability for social infrastructureo others

FN attributes and some initial discussion items

The ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks – 7

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 27

o The NGN standardization activity has almost completed the basic initial steps, but much remains to be done

• Evolution of NGN: ongoing and future working directions in order to support new and varying customer needs, and a larger set of applications and business models

• Challenges and requirements in numerous (new) areas o A growing interest (and funding) in Future Networks

within the worldwide research community• Harmonization of activities is essential for globally

interoperable future ICT infrastructures• Standardization should start as early as possible when

targeting the future social infrastructure• The ITU is taking an active role in promoting global

and harmonized frameworks and a shared standardization roadmap for Future Networks

Conclusion

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 27-29 July 2009 28

Thank you for your attention

Questions ?