341
621.646-83. . , . , ., (4876) 79-65-58, [email protected],. . , ., (4872) 49-05-81, [email protected]
, , )
-, , -
-.
: , , -, .
( ) ,
), , , , -, . . [1]. -
, , ( . 1).
, -,
-.
-, , -
. , , , -, ,
. --
, ,
. , , -, -
[2, 3], -
. . 2011. . 5. .1
342
, [4].,
. 1, , .
, , . ,
.
. 1.
[5, 6] , , -
,
-.
, :
321024
124
321 MMMMRk
JkJJJJ
rr, (1)
343
321214
224
3 FFFqRk
JRJm
r, (2)
0M – , ,; 1M – , ,; 2M – , ; 3M –
, -,
, ; 1F – ,, ; 2F – , ; 3F –
, ; 4321 ,,, JJJJ – -, , ,
, 2 ;3m – , ; – ; 2q –
, ; 1 – ,2; 2 – , 2; rk – -
( ) -); R – , ;
(1) . (2) ,
. ,, , (2)
max2abs xq , 02 , 02p , max22 )(sign xqq , (3)
maxx – , , .
, MATLAB.
-,
. , --
., -
, « » -250-45 -
250 45 . ( . 2) -
. . 2011. . 5. .1
344
(1), (2), - – [8] (3),
0M , , 4 80 4 [7, 8]
380 50 . -
-, .1.
: 0,68 ; 3 ; 22 ;
0,35 ; 27,33; 61037,1 ;
5,5 ;
: 41112,0 pr ; :
410 2 , 4103 2 , – 4105 2 , – 4108 2 .
( . 2),-
300 .
. 2.
345
. 2: sI – , ;
0M – , , 5; 1p –, 10 ; 2q – -
, ; t – , .. 2, -
, , LM .
. 2, -, , -
, - " " .
, -, 2q ,
, .
. 2, , -LM ,
. --
0,1 0,5 0,25 0,1.
- ( . . 2, ) )(1 tp , )(tIs , )(0 tM ,
)(2 tq .--
. -
, -, . -
-, -
-. ,
-,
, , .
. . 2011. . 5. .1
346
1. . . .: ,1981. 368 .
2. . – - // -
. 2005. 3. . 50-54.3. .
// . 2009. 6. . 34-40.4. ., .
// -. 2009. 3. . 67-71.
5. . // . . -
. . 5. : , 2010. . 34-35.6. ., . -
// . -. . 1. 2011. . 133-142.
7. . : . 3- ., . . .: ., 2001.
327 .8. 4 : / . [
.]. .: , 1982. 504 .
V.A. Mozzhechkov, A.S. SavinTHE COMPUTER SIMULATION OF PIPELINE ARMATURE’S ELECTRIC
ACTUATORA computer simulation of pipeline armature’s electric actuator with the worm me-
chanism for a torque moment’s measurement on the basis of designed mathematical model,which describe both energetic and information-measuring processes in electric actuator atrealization of various laws of controls is made.
Key words: electric actuator, pipeline armature, worm gear, computer simulation.
03.10.11
Recommended
