5. Finance Performance DaysDas Forum für aktuelle Finance-, Controlling- und BI-Themen
20. Oktober 2016 – Stuttgart / 9. November - München
Seite 2
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 3
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 4
This session aims at providing an understanding of RPA project leading practice
5. Finance Performance Day
Session objective is to share insights of:
► Background on RPA
► Vendor considerations
► Project phases and purpose
► Key activities for each phase
► Deliverables for each project phase
► Milestones and time frame
► Examples from projects
► Lessons learned
Oktober 16
Seite 5
If you do RPA wrong, it will fail like a white elephantproject – everybody talks about but no use case
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 6
Robotics originated with industrial appliances
5. Finance Performance Day
Unmanned ground vehicles
Laboratory Automation
Anthropomorphic robots and toys
Precision-controlled robotic surgery
Picking, packing, and sorting robots
Injection molding, machining, and robotic controls
Sensors and components
Heavy robotics (aerospace, construction, and agriculture)
Warehouse automation
Industrial robotics
Autonomous marine systems
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Commercial inspection robotics (e.g., assembly lines)
Robotic surgery platforms
Bionics and exoskeletons
Humanoid and highly mobile robots
Solar and semiprocess Robotics
1950–1990Early focus on heavy
robotics for industrial, warehouse, and military
applications
1991–2000Increased focus on unmanned aerial
and marine vehicles
2001–2005Growth in medical and
Anthropomorphicapplications
2006-2010Rapid growth in
anthropomorphic robots and toys, robotic
surgery and lab automation, and unmanned ground vehicles
2011–2014Growth in unmanned
aerial vehicles for agriculture,therapeutic bionics, and consumer
applications
Oktober 16
Seite 7
Nearly half of US jobs may be susceptible toautomation over the next two decades
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Probation Officers and Correctional Treatment Specialists
Ambulance Drivers and Attendants, Except Emergency Medical Technicians
Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Technical andScientific Products
Agricultural Engineers
Telecommunication Line Installers and Repairers
Police, Fire, and Ambulance Dispatchers
Court Reporters
Demonstrators and Product PromotersDental Assistants
Postmasters and Mail Superintendents
Tile and Marble Setters
Painters, Construction and Maintenance
Transportation Attendants, Except Flight Attendants
Nuclear Power Reactor Operators
Real Estate Brokers
Models
Credit Analysts
Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks
.25 .50 .75 .95+
Occupations according to their probability of automation
Seite 8
Myth about RPA
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
“All the office work can be automated by RPA”
“RPA is primarily useful to cut operational costs”
“Robots will eventually replace the majority of my employees”
“RPA can be implemented without the support and involvement of the CIO org.”
“RPA is the silver bullet for optimizing my admin. and operational organization"
1
2
3
4
5
The easiest way to describe RPA is as software that mimics human behavior.This human behavior should typically be "rule-based" and requires digital inputs for the RPA software to be effective.Terms such as “robots”, “augmented technology” and “artificial intelligence” have however rendered in some persistent myths
Seite 9
RPA impact goes beyond POCs and deployment and needs to be embedded in a holistic approach
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Org
an
iza
tio
nla
ye
rE
xecu
tio
nla
ye
rR
eso
urc
ela
ye
r
• Develop and deliver RPA optimized end to end processes to maximize benefits• Establish global RPA policies and
governance framework to support risk management
• Review control frameworks to ensure documentation and testing appropriate for RPA
• Structure the organization to consider new RPA roles to support the business
• Define appropriate local, regional, global structures including shared services and outsourcing
• Define a set of consistent global data standards and common chart of accounts then deploy utilizing RPA with existing systems until future system deployment projects
• Implement RPA single source of data projects
• Define RPA systems and tools strategy to support cross-functional use in front, middle and back office
• Successful programs typically benefit from a constellation of tools
• Consider impacts on existing software contracts and future system implementations
• Develop new RPA frameworks for performance measurement
• Develop RPA COE and continuous improvement program
• Build new competency models considering Robot/Human interactions
• Develop career ladders and job roles for RPA enabled teams for new skill needs
• Adjust talent strategy to new competency models
Process
People
Organization
Seite 10
The delivery & governance models change…
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
► An intelligent and learning computer system replicates the actions and judgments of the employees and takes over repetitive tasks and processes
SSC / Delivery unit Manual processing
Output
SSC / Delivery unit- Operations Control - Exception Handling
Automated processing
Output
Business
Old delivery model New delivery model
Delivery model Governance model
Business
► The system is monitored and maintained by an operations team, which also adds subjective judgment to difficult cases
Input / Business need
Output
Business
BusinessInput / Business need
► The governance model is adjusted to fit the shift in delivery model
► IT is a highly important stakeholder but the responsibility for delivery remains with the Service Delivery Manager, in accordance with the process developed by Global Process Owner and with the support of Solution Designer regarding IT enablement
Service DeliveryManager
Global Process Owner
Solution Designer
[E2E Process]
Operations
SSC / Delivery
unitIT
Un
its
Ro
les
an
d T
ask
s
► Manage process execution team including robotic environment
► Updates rules in accordance with process
► Reports on performance KPIs to SSC / Delivery unit head and Function head
► Define the functional IT solutions and enablers
► Supports in more advanced and IT architecture related topics of RPA
► Reports to Function head and IT on process and IT KPIs
Design / Build Execute Build / EnableFocus:
► Defines the processes
► Defines the RPA process requirements for Solution Designer
► Reports on process-KPIs to Function head
Seite 11
.. and needs to be adjusted accordingly for GBS
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Service Delivery ManagerGlobal Process Owner Solution Designer
[E2E Process]
OperationsSSC / Delivery unit IT
Un
its
Ro
les
an
d T
ask
s
► Manage process execution team including robotic environment
► Updates rules in accordance with process
► Reports on performance KPIs to SSC / Delivery unit head and Function head
► Define the functional IT solutions and enablers
► Supports in more advanced and IT architecture related topics of RPA
► Reports to Function head and IT on process and IT KPIs
Design / Build Execute Build / EnableFocus:
► Defines the processes
► Defines the RPA process requirements for Solution Designer
► Reports on process-KPIs to Function head
Updated GBS governance model ► The governance
model is adjusted to fit the shift in delivery model
► IT is a highly important stakeholder but the responsibility for delivery remains with the Service Delivery Manager, in accordance with the process developed by Global Process Owner and with the support of Solution Designer regarding IT enablement
Seite 12
A Centre-of-Excellence (CoE) structure can provide support for RPA
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Training
• Develop training material as well as plan and perform trainings
• Certify robotics practitioners
Solution insights
• Gather, consolidate and share knowledge of vendors and tools
Methodology and approach
• Develop and share leading practice methodology and approach
Project delivery • Provides resources that can lead
and support in project • Focus on building capabilities
within: process analysis, robot development and robot IT infrastructure
• Perform quality assurance on robotics projects (independent of size)
Support provided by the CoE ► CoE team provides competencies needed to provide E2E support in the four areas to the right. This entalies
► Ensuring delivery capabilities (significant team size to ensure ability to meet project demands)
► Ability to challance and develop methodology as well as available tools
► Parttaking in the fast phased development within the RPA market to feed the rest of the organization with knowledge through ad-hoc requiests as well as structured trainings
► Deep understanding of tools used for RPA
Seite 13
EY has the knowledge of the key RPA suppliers and their capabilities to deliver value to clients
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
EY is continuously following the fast development on the market in order to know about the:
► Capabilities ► Product portfolio► Strengths and weaknesses ► Latest innovation ► Trends► Large deals ► Partnerships and alliances ► etc.
RPA suppliers
And many others..
Seite 14
RPA 5-step approach from idea to benefit
► Adjust the delivery- and
governance model design (from
a function end-to-end
perspective) to fit the new ways
of working: a computer system
replicates the actions of the
employees and takes over
repetitive tasks and processes
► Setup the robotics team
(internal, external or mixed
resources) to monitor and
maintain the automated process
► Track performance in line with
initial metrics from business
case to ensure benefit relation
► Organize RPA user training
sessions and re-align
stakeholders
► Initiate cutover and deploy
robots into production
► Provide post deployment ad-
hoc support
► Monitor solution performance
based on agreed Hypercare Exit
success criteria
► Resolve any post go-live errors
or issues
► Business hand over
► Setup technical
infrastructure and install
RPA software
► Technical design - Update
product / sprint backlog
► On-going scrum activities
including sprint planning /
review sessions, daily stand
ups and issues tracking
► Develop detailed test plan
► Iterative testing of the
user stories finalized in
each development sprint,
including interfaces with
legacy systems, exception
handling routines and
robotics queue
management procedures
► Validate UAT and OAT
testing scenarios and run
readiness assessment
► Obtain business acceptance
► Set strategic direction - Define
main drivers, pain points, high
level scope and decide on key
considerations with key
stakeholders to clarify target
outcome and high level potential
for RPA initiative (workshop)
► Mobilize project organization
including stakeholder resources
► Agree on the business case
framework and benefit tracking
structure to be used for
identifying the next process
automation candidates
► Opportunity assessment to
identify the top process
opportunities, initial business
case and quick wins (workshop)
Set target Design requirements Develop and Test* Deploy* Manage and control
Detail requirements,
verify potential and
prioritize scope
Robotic solution
developmentDeploy robots into
production and enable
robotic capabilities
Manage & control bot
workforce
Define strategic direction,
target outcome
and initial scope
► Initiate knowledge transfer
activities from EY to client
► Perform detailed process
analysis and business
requirements (user stories)
including acceptance criteria
► Update business case
► Validate process scope and
priorities based on manual
effort (FTE), applications, user
interaction etc. (workshop)
► Functional design - Design
detailed to-be process maps
(desktop operations level) for
automation scope
► Agree implementation plan and
approach with stakeholders
► Select vendor and tool
Pu
rpo
seA
cti
vit
ies
*iterative working through the process scope according to priorities Ph
ase
s
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 15
Deliverables and tools in the RPA 5-step approach
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
► Updated delivery model
(function E2E perspective)
► Updated governance model
(function E2E perspective)
► Established robotic team
capabilities (resources and
competencies)
► Business case results
► RPA user training
► Hypercare Exit success
criteria
► Hypercare performance log
► Ad-hoc support and solution
adjustments
► Business handover
documentation
► IT environments setup
and tool installed
► Technical design - Robotic
process maps developed
and product / sprint
backlog developed
► Test plan
► Scrum meeting reports
► Automated processes
operating in test
environment
► UAT and OAT protocols
► Business acceptance
► RPA strategy
► Drivers (what to achieve)
► Pinpoints and priorities
► Ambition and role of RPA
(short and long-term)
► High level target
operating model
► Sourcing strategy
► Implementation
approach (how to scale)
► Business case- and benefit
tracking framework
► Indicative business case
potential and quick wins
► Identified scope and high
level process description
► Detailed as-is process map
► Detailed process information
► Business requirements
► Exception handling
approach
► Manual effort (FTEs)
► Applications
► User interaction etc.
► Updated business case
► Validated process scope
► To-be functional design -
desktop level process maps for
selected processes
► Implementation plan
► Stakeholder sign off material
► Selected vendor and tool
Set target Design requirements Develop and Test* Deploy* Manage and control
*iterative working through the process scope according to priorities
De
liv
era
ble
sIl
lust
rati
on
sP
ha
ses
Detailed as-is process map
Implementation
plan
To-be design
Business case framework
and indicative potential
Scope and high level
process description
1
2
Detailed
process info
Delivery model
Governance model
Technical design
Automated process
RPA user training
Business handover
documentation
Seite 16
Timeplanning in the 5-step approach
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Tim
e p
lan
an
d m
ile
sto
ne
s
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9
**iterative working through the process scope according to priorities
Week 10
Set target
Design requirements
Develop and Test**
Deploy**
Manage and control
- Milestone
Strategic direction
workshop
Draft business
case
Opportunity
assessment
workshop
- Milestone Workshop
Updated business
case
Process validation
workshop
To-be functional design
(for selected processes)
Stakeholder
signoff
Selected vendor
and tool
Technical design Process
automated in
test environment
Business sign off
and cutover
readiness
RPA user
trainings
Production go-live Hypercare Exit
criteria sign off
Benefit
realization
sign off
Delivery- and
governance model
approved
Seite 17
Strategic direction – cost efficiency considerations
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Dimension Example focus area Low (<10%) High (>50%)Indicators of likely benefit
► Large “back-office” teams
► High ratio of staff to customer
► No single back-office team larger than 15 people
► Most processes span teams
► Back-office Teams > 50 people► Teams own processes
► Internally controlled functions► Process / IT control rests with
3rd parties► Direct control of tools and
processes
► Multiple legacy applications
► Major Transformation programmes
► Consolidated platform with low cost of change
► No major transformations
► Numerous legacy platforms► High change cost / capacity► Transformation over 2+ years
► Lean and other process optimisation initiatives
► Low rate of change► Primarily strategy focussed
(e.g. segment, marketing)
► Significant change scope► IT budget more constrained than
business budget
► Self-serve and digital transformation
► Customer Service (complaints or churn)
► Core platforms digitally enabled► Low in-bound call volumes► Complaints and churn low► Simple, automated products
► Strategic digital initiative constrained by legacy integration
► High in-bound call volumes► Complex corporate products
► High-cost countries
► High-growth countries
► Low-cost ratio of people vs IT► Low growth
► High-cost ratio (people vs IT)► High growth (revenue & product
sophistication)
► High-volume manual processes
► Processes where offshoring precluded
► Significant offshore / shared service centre
► 90% core processes automated
► <50% processes fully automated► Data protection prevents
offshoring
Business drivers
People and organisation
Process & policies
IT landscape
Project portfolio
Location / Geography
Governance and outsourcing
2
7
4
5
1
6
3
Seite 18
Business case framework and indicative potential
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Cost Efficiency vs Human Effort
Improved customer satisfaction, reduced exception costs► Real-time processing improves service, reduces dependent process exceptions
► Batch processing out-of-hours windows reduces legacy platform load at peak
Timing and Frequency
Accelerate innovation by 9-12 months by tactical integration► Allows product and service innovations to be rapidly created and piloted, without
expensive legacy system upgrade or integration dependencies
Accelerated Innovation and Growth
Supports strategic platform upgrades & regulatory change► Cost efficient tactical solutions reduce pressure on platform roadmaps
► Alternative to platform customisation, reducing deployment and upgrade cost
Strategic Programme Cost Reduction
50% 70% cost reduction for high-frequency tasks► Immediate cost benefit where teams of people perform manual processing with
little subjective judgment
Improved consistency, control, traceability and MI► Robotics generates full MI and audit of process flows, actions and exceptions
► Also provides MI on source-system performance
Governance, Quality Control and Audit
► Robotic Automation serves as an alternative to further outsourcing and offshoring activities (e.g. data doesn’t leave the country, no time lag, less coordination between teams)
► Moreover, Robotic Automation serve as a serious opportunity to reclaim activities from offshore and the re-implementation on-site (e.g. high degrees of compliance with internal controls / COSO) !
1
2
3
4
5
Seite 19
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Oktober 16
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 20
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Oktober 16
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 21
Most of the providers in RPA rely on the input of other automation enabling technology
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Enterprise Infrastructure / Enterprise Cloud
Systems of Record (ERP, CRM, …)Data Warehouse / Data Lake
Cognitive Automation
Digitization
Workforce Orchestration
Au
tom
atio
nA
uto
ma
tion
en
ab
lers
Mobile
BPM/DCM
Classical UX
Data Science
Da
ta I
nte
gra
tio
n (
ET
L,
DQ
, M
DM
)
Robotic Automation
Au
tom
ati
on
BI/
An
aly
tics
Em
be
dd
ed
Au
tom
ati
on
Note: list of companies is non-exhaustive
Seite 22
Scope considerations in Finance
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Operational
Accounting
Procure to
Pay
General
Accounting
Financial &
External
Reporting
Performance
&
Management
Reporting
Budgeting,
Planning and
Forecasting
Policy,
Controls,
Governance &
Compliance
Internal Audit Treasury
Capital
Management
&
Investments
Tax Planning
& Accounting
Investor
Relations
1
Loan AccountingStrategic
Sourcing
Chart of
Accounts
Maintenance
Financial
ReportingResponsibility
Reporting
Strategic
Planning
Accounting
Policy & Gov.
Risk & Control
Framework
Debt/Equity
ManagementCapital Planning Tax Planning
Stakeholder ID
and Analysis
2
Investment
Accounting
Vendor
Administration
Allocations &
Adjustments
Regulatory
Reporting Org profit
reporting
Annual Budget
Regulatory
Policy & Gov.
Functional
Auditing
FX Management
Capital Structure
and Asset level
Tax Accounting /
Tax data
management
Stakeholder
engagement
3Insurance
AccountingContract
Negotiations
Journal Entry
Processing
Reporting Product
Profitability
Quarterly/
Rolling forecastStatutory Policy
& Gov.Consultation
Liquidity
ManagementBusiness Case
Support
Tax accounting /
AnalysisStakeholder
relations
4Reinsurance
Accounting
Accounts
Payable
Reconciliations Statutory
Reporting
Customer
ProfitabilityEarnings
Forecast
Mgmt.
Accounting
Policy & Gov.
Cash
ManagementAcquisitions &
Divestitures
Tax accounting /
Preparation and
review
Corporate
Communication
s
5 Fund AccountingRequisitions &
PO Processing
Inter-company
Transactions Audit SupportFund Profitability Internal Process
& Controls
Capital Strategy Project
Accounting
Tax compliance Rating Agency
Relations
6
Accounts
Receivable Payroll ConsolidationCost
Development
SOX Compliance Bank RelationsTax controversy/
tax audits
7
Billing &
Collections
Exp Accounting
&
Reimbursement
Close Cost AllocationsTax & Treasury
Policy
Treasury
Strategy
8Dispute
Resolution
Fixed Asset
Accounting
Funds Transfer
Pricing
Finance Master
Data
Governance
Global
Economics
9Policy
Accounting
Securities
Pricing &
Product Control
Ad hoc
Reporting
10
Legal Entity
Mgmt/
maintenance
Analytics &
Decision Support
6
Robotics
OCR / Structured Forms
Rules EnginesDigital / Workflow
6Desktop Acceleration
Situationally valuable
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Seite 23
Example how to get started in Finance
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Map Ref.Finance Process
Automation
Opportunity
Illustrative Use Case
C.3Journal Entry Processing
Automated Journal Entries:• Prepare and enter corporate and consolidated GAAP journal entries to close the company books
during quarterly closing process• Prepare and enter journal entries for other regulatory process needs - e.g. for Tax ledger
C.4 C.5 I.6 Reconciliation
Intercompany Difference Reconciliation :• Triage and action exception items from intercompany differences regionally and aggregating into
parent• Support intracompany match and elimination for multi-national reinsurance business• Match and reconcile operating expenses eliminating duplicated controls and charges
Bank Reconciliation :• Reconciliation of balances and transactions on the bank statements to GL/cash flow systems. This
could also include creating balancing journal entry to handle discrepancies.
C.10G.8
Entity & Account Maintenance
Entity, Account, mappings & adjustments maintenance for downstream systems (e.g. Tax systems):• Identify and synchronize master data (Legal Entities-Jurisdictions, Non-legal Entities, Partnerships,
BU-cost centers, Accounts & adjustments) from finance / legal systems to downstream systems (e.g. Tax systems)
C.7Close
Controller focused management review deck preparation:• Prepare management review deck by collecting data from GL & multiple systems for non-operating
expenses and cash balances. Builds confidence in data lineage.
Mock close & mock conversions:• Support mock close, mock conversions and testing during system implementation of a new GL
System Implementation project (e.g. automate process flow from mock conversion to mock close to balance reconciliation – to be repeated of all involved entities)
Capacity and critical path
Eliminate Material Human Effort
Refocus knowledge workers for greater value
Reduce costly errors; improve quality
Seite 24
Example of GL automation assessment I/III
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
► The robot can formally validate the request and perform maintenance of items or entire tables, follow-up on the upload to SAP, ticketing and exception and error handling
► The robot can perform postings for special cases and perform the validation of the postings prior to approval, approvals are manual
► Time frame for rollout sequense is usually relatively short
Description (BEAM)
Automation potentialComments and considerations
Indicative level of automation
Common time frame
Manage General Ledger account master data
The robot can formally validate the request and perform the maintenance of items or entire tables
The robot can perform the follow-up on the upload to MDRS and distribution to SAP (including in the final Company codes, not only reference code)
Can handle creating and maintaining the tickets
Perform exception and error handling as a result of account detective
The robot will not be involved in approval activities that would involve information review and checks
How is the workflow, who is the requestor? GPO / Accountant responsibilities
Perform manual General Ledger posting (standard cases)
The standard can be automated One can automate part of the checks and
validations that ensure the information has been correctly posted in GL
The robot has limited functionality in terms of creating the postings
Ability to check double postings in SAP for one WPA, or additional run check report for double postings
Check for validation granted by WPA
Near Mid Long
Examples of robotics opportunities within General Ledger
Near Mid Long
Seite 25
Example of GL automation assessment II/III
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Description (BEAM) Automation potentialComments and considerations
Indicative level of
automation
Common time frame
Perform manual General Ledger posting (special cases)
The robot can perform postings for special cases and perform the validation of the postings prior to approval
Automated approval for postings that receive OK after the validation can be considered
Keep 4-eyes –principle and check
Perform account monitoring and clearing
The robot can perform the monitoring, automatic clearing and exception handling for the accounts
Standard criteria for clearing in SAP Quantum (hedging) results in minor
rounding differences (cents) Differences can be verified by Robot
based on transactions (rules) and perform clearing (overnight)
Manual clearing and update of criteria cannot be automated
For available automatic clearing, additional benefits from Robotics?
Could be supported by Robot via usage of existing tools
Near Mid Long
Near Mid Long
► The robot can formally validate the request and perform maintenance of items or entire tables, follow-up on the upload to SAP, ticketing and exception and error handling
► The robot can perform postings for special cases and perform the validation of the postings prior to approval, approvals are manual
► Time frame for rollout sequense is usually relatively short
Examples of robotics opportunities within General Ledger
Seite 26
Example of GL automation assessment III/III
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Description (BEAM) Automation potentialComments and considerations
Indicative level of
automation
Common time frame
Perform balance carry-forward (GL, subledger, CSL)
Robot can monitor closing and perform postings of balance carry-forward Near Mid Long
► The robot can formally validate the request and perform maintenance of items or entire tables, follow-up on the upload to SAP, ticketing and exception and error handling
► The robot can perform postings for special cases and perform the validation of the postings prior to approval, approvals are manual
► Time frame for rollout sequense is usually relatively short
Examples of robotics opportunities within General Ledger
Seite 27
AR example workshop output
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Robotics opportunities identified during the workshop
% of Automation
Process ID Process name Details of automation potential identified Comments
AR-30-20-40AR-30-20-50AR-30-20-60AR-30-20-70
• Verify and post doubtful debts and provision for bad debts
• Verify and post write offs
• Verify and post reversal of provision for bad debt
• Post and clear open items on customer account
The following process can be done by the bot1. The bot can log into SSF and create a ticket for data to
AccP2. The bot can then log into the SAP download the data
and then covert that into an excel file 3. Bot can perform necessary credit adjustment
calculation in excel based on rules set by customer portfolio group
4. Bot can send it to CM team for review5. The bot can then send it to authorization based on the
names defined in SAP6. Based on the response from the authorized personal,
bot can either post the doubtful debts7. Once done the bot can then post the provisions for bad
debts8. The bot can then log in and clear the open items on the
customer account.
• The customers need to be grouped in portfolios according to specific criteria for credit adjustment
TimelineNear Mid Long
No of FTES No of Systems
• SAP, SSF,email
HighVolumes Average handling time
Benefits overview
Seite 28
Example from AR functional design
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 29
Example of agile approach for delivery
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 30
EY has identified a set of key success factors from RPA implementations
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
1. Define strategy and set desired outcome / targets early in the process
2. Build business case
3. Perform proper analysis to target the right operations
4. Involve IT early
5. Deploy a strong Change Management workstream
6. Start small and agile, but be clear about ambition
7. Secure access to testing environment (internally or through supplier)
8. Evaluate maturity level internally and by supplier – focus on transformational capacity
9. Ensure that there is a match with supplier long term strategy (RPA is at an early stage and will develop fast)
10. Design new governance models
EY has gathered experience from several implementations with clients from different industries, different functions and with different maturity related to RPA. Some success factors do however stand out as key when implementing RPA.
Seite 31
EY is investing heavily in a global integrated delivery approach for Robotics
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
What differentiates EY is: ► Innovation Lab- client, vendor,
industry innovation partnerships ► Robotics Academy- RPA training
on tools and methodologies► Solution Stacks- EY IP on
existing technologies for functions and sectors jump start RPA programs
► Technology and Delivery agnostic- independent advice to select the right tools and delivery
► Vendor Alliances- strategic, collaboration and joint solution development
► Comprehensive support- 70+ value enhancers in Tax, Controls, People, Change, Functions, etc.
► Eat our Own Dog Food- RPA deployed internally in EY GBS
► Large Global Footprint- One of the largest and more experienced global network of RPA >350 practitioners
► Digital RPA experience lab-showcasing RPA in action(Frankfurt and Silicon Valley)
RPA Strategy
RPA Heat Mapping
RPA Proof of Value
RPA Implementation
RPA Innovation lab
RPA Managed Service
EY RPA Advisory offering
RPA Solution Coordination Americas – Weston Jones
RPA Technical Team Americas – Oscar Marinez
RPA Solution CoordinationEMEIA – Martin Weis
RPA Center of ExcellenceEMEIA – Aurelia Costache
RPA Solution Coordination APAC – Pascal Bornet
RPA Technical TeamAPAC – Varghese
Abraham
120 FTE
160 FTE
140 FTE
Six Global Delivery COEs- Bucharest, Romania; Buenos Aires, Argentina; Dalian, China; Manila, Philippines; San Jose, Costa Rica and Trivandrum, India
Seite 32
EY has the capabilities in RPA and deploys it internally as well
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
EY has the capabilities and resources to deliver sustainable efficiency on a global scale with a strong footmark in developing your automation strategy.
EY has a preferred alliance partnership with Blue Prism globally. being engaged with Blue Prism for robotics deployment across multiple businesses.
EY’s robotics Center-of-Excellence facilitates global alignment in tools, accelerators, frameworks and approach. For example, In 2015, we were 140+ strong RPA practice globally who delivered 15+ PoC and 5+ engagements in RPA.
Global resources and Vendor Network
EY offers a global robotics
capability with a consistent
delivery across geographies
We have a broad RPA
vendor network with a clear
view of their individual
strengths and weaknesses
Technology Leader and Knowledge Champion
We are in constant contact
with RPA market leaders &
Start-up’s to know about
latest artificial intelligence
applications & technologies
Leveraging our knowledge
of software capabilities, EY
provides guidance on what
can be achieved; how best
to deploy & most effectively
use the software
Program-, Quality-, Change-Assurance
EY ensures that RPA
implementations are audit
reliable and follow a smooth
program and quality
assurance approach
We accompany you during
times of transitions &
changes to establish new
governance structures
Seite 33 5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
A) Das Thema Robotics ist noch neu für mich
B) Ich bin mit dem Thema Robotics vertraut
C) Ich habe ein gutes Verständnis zum Thema Robotics und denke über den Einsatz in meinem Unternehmen nach
D) Ich habe praktische Erfahrungen / Robotics ist bereits im Einsatz
Frage: Haben Sie sich bereits mit dem Thema Robotics im Accounting auseinandergesetzt?
Seite 34 5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
A) General Accounting
B) Performance and Management Reporting
C) Budgeting, Planning and Forecasting
D) Treasury
E) Keine von den genannten
Frage: In welchen Bereichen nutzten Sie bereits Robotics?
Seite 35 5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
A) Harmonisierung der Anforderungen im Unternehmen (z.B. einheitliche IT-Strukturen, standardisierte Prozesse etc.)
B) Durchführbarkeit für den Ausbau von Robotics
C) Kosten für die Umsetzung / den Ausbau von Robotics
D) Know How für Umsetzung / den Ausbau von Robotics
E) Eine andere Herausforderung
Frage: Wo sehen Sie die größten Herausforderungen für den weiteren Ausbau von Robotics?
Seite 36 5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
A) Shared Services sind die geeignete Organisationsform für Managementprozesse auch bei weitreichender Automatisierung
B) Bei weitreichender Automatisierung fallen viele transaktionale Tätigkeiten weg, so dass eine dezentrale Organisation geeigneter ist
C) Auch bei weitreichender Automatisierung muss Prozesswissen global gebündelt werden. Shared Services sind dazu am besten geeignet
Frage: Glauben Sie man benötigt noch ein SSC bei einem weitreichenden Ansatz von Robotics?
Seite 37
Your Contact Person
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Dierk Guldin
Executive Director
Ernst & Young GmbHWirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Flughafenstraße 61
70629 Stuttgart
Telefon: 0160 939 15015
Email: [email protected]
Seite 38
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Oktober 16
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 39
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Oktober 16
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 40
Agenda – Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Oktober 16
1. WMF Intro
2. Gesamtkostenverfahren (GKV) vs. Umsatzkostenverfahren (UKV)
3. Projekt-Umfang
4. Zusatz-Anforderungen
5. Wesentliche Meilensteine
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
7. IFRS- und Konsolidierungsfragen
8. Technische Realisierung
9. Lessons Learned
10. Fragen oder Hinweise ?
Seite 41
1. WMF Intro
Oktober 16
► Gegründet 1853
► Zu den Produkten zählen Geschirr und Besteck sowie Küchenartikel, Elektrokleingeräte und gewerbliche Kaffeemaschinen
► Firmenzentrale in Süddeutschland, weltweiter Vertrieb
► Jährliche Umsatzerlöse ca. 1 Milliarde €; über 5.000 Mitarbeiter
► Im Privatbesitz
Seite 42
1. WMF Intro
Oktober 16
Die WMF Group – Drei führende Geschäftsbereiche
• VollautomatischeKaffeemaschinen für den gewerblichen Einsatz
• Die Nummer 1 auf dem Weltmarkt
• Unterstützt durch den eigenen Vertrieb und Vertriebspartner sowie durch Servicenetzwerke
• Umsatz in Höhe von 394 Mio. Euro im Jahr 2015
• Premiumprodukte für Tisch und Küche, einschließlich Elektrokleingeräten
• Marktführer in der DACH-Region(1)
und die am schnellsten wachsende Kochgeschirr-Marke Chinas der Jahre 2014 and 2015
• Verkauf über Handelspartner, eigene Geschäfte (ca. 200 in der DACH-Region, ca. 130 Konzessionsgeschäfte in China) und Online-Kanäle
• Umsatz in Höhe von 590 Mio. Euro im Jahr 2015
• Premium-Tafelgeschirr und -besteck für Hotels, Restaurants sowie Kreuzfahrtschiffe
• Marktführer in der DACH-Region und Weltmarktführer im Luxussegment
• Unterstützt durch firmeneigeneund Händler-Vertriebskanäle
• Umsatz in Höhe von 75 Mio. Euro im Jahr 2015
Globales Kaffeemaschinengeschäft
(37 % Umsatz)
Globales Konsumgeschäft(56 % Umsatz)
Globales Hotelgeschäft(7 % Umsatz)
1) „DACH“ bezieht sich auf Deutschland, Österreich und die Schweiz.
Seite 43
Herstellungskosten der zur Erzielung der Umsatzerlöse
erbrachten Leistungen
Vertriebskosten
Verwaltungskosten
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Sonstige betriebliche Aufwendungen
Sonstige betriebliche Erträge
Materialaufwand
Personalaufwand
Abschreibung
Sonstige betriebliche Aufwendungen
Sonstige betriebliche Erträge Umsatzkosten
Umsatz
Betriebsergebnis (EBIT)
Rohertrag
Bruttoergebnis
=
=
Vertriebs- u. allgem. Verwaltungskosten
Betriebsergebnis (EBIT)
Umsatz
Oktober 16
2. Gesamtkostenverfahren (GKV) vs. Umsatzkostenverfahren (UKV)
Seite 44
3. Projekt-Umfang
... …
Oktober 16
Seite 45
4. Zusatz-Anforderungen
April
2014
Juli
2014
Januar
2015
Juli
2015
Dez.
2015
Januar
2016
Juli
2016
Dez.
2016
Financials: Mapping GKV ins UKV
Financials: Implementierung Planungslösung (BPC)
Financials: Qualitätsverbesserung auf 100% Übereinstimmung mit IFRS
1. Phase
2. Phase
3. Phase
COSMO-Scope
Gesonderte
Projekte,
zusätzlich
zu COSMO
Team
VE
WW
Tanja Massauer zugeteilt
Zusatz-Anforderunge
n seitens Operations
COSMO-Add-On
Offene Projekte
- Nutzbarkeit der Daten von S&OP
- Re-Design „WMF AG Ergebnisanalyse“
- Optimierung des jährlichen Inventur-Prozesses
- etc.
Umsatz, Brutto-Erg, EBIT nach Regionen
Implementierung in BPC-Planungslösung: Umsatz, Brutto-Ergebnis, EBIT nach BU + Regionen
Konzept Fkt. Sicht
Implementierung Funktionale Sicht
WMF-konzernweite Harmonisierung der Kostenstellenorg. inkl. Controller-Leitfaden
Automatisierte Dateneingabe für jede Legaleinheit
Customer Spend Waterfall Konzept + Implementierung
Konzept sowie Implementierung Brutto-Ergebnis zu Standardkosten
KPI- Tool Operations
Konzeption und Implementierung des neuen Operations Models und eines Cost-Analysis-Tools
Konzeption und Implementierung der Werksergebnisrechnung
Konzeption und Implementierung neuer BDE / MDE (Shopfloor, SAP CO, SAP HR)
Neues QA/QC Kosten-Controlling
Neues Investitions-Controlling
Konzeption und Implementierung der neuen Materialkosten Analyse
Konzeption und Implementierung der neuen Logistikkosten Analyse
ES
Oktober 16
Seite 46
Konz. Funkt. Sicht
April
2014
Juli
2014
Dez.
2014
Januar
2015
Juli
2015
Dez.
2015
Januar
2016
Juli
2016
Financials: Mapping GKV ins UKV
Financials: Implementierung Planungslösung (BPC)
Financials: Qualitätsverbesserung auf 100% Übereinstimmung mit IFRS
1. Phase
2. Phase
3. Phase
Implementierung in BPC-Planungslösung: Umsatz, Brutto-
Ergebnis, EBIT nach BU + Regionen
Implementierung Funktionale Sicht
WMF-konzernweite Harmonisierung der Kostenstellenorg. inkl.
Controller-Leitfaden
Automatisierte Dateneingabe für jede Legaleinheit
COSMO-Scope
Gesonderte Projekte, zusätzlich zu COSMO
Team
VE
COSMO-Add-On
Dez.
2016
C
O S
M
O
Implementierung UKV in allen lokalen
ERP-Systemen
Verbesserung der UKV-QualitätCOSMO-ERP
4. Zusatz-Anforderungen
Oktober 16
Seite 47
5. Wesentliche Meilensteine
UKV Bilanzierungs-Handbuch verfügbar
Start der BPC Implementierung
April
2014
Juli
2014
Okt.
2014
Januar
2015
März
2015
Juli
2015
Dez.
2015
Januar.
2016
Juli
2016
Dez.
2016
► Wesentliche Meilensteine des COSMO Projekt’s(ohne Funktionale Sicht “COSMO-add-on”, und ohne “COSMO-ERP”)
UKV Training für rel. Finanzer/Controller
in Deutsch und Englisch
Mapping: UKV Konzern GuV, segmentiert, „as reported“ inkl. 2014, Feb. 2015, Budget 2015
„Go Live“ BPC am 15. Juli 2015
IST-Reporting neu: „100 Berichte“
5* User-Training BPC in Geislingen sowie in
Shanghai (Juni 2015)
COSMO Kick-Off anlässlich der
Finance Conference in Geislingen
Entscheidung für Planungstool
SAP/BPC
Verabschiedung des BPC Business
Blueprints
Kick-Off 3. Phase: 100% IFRS-Konformität
100% IFRS Konformität(3. Phase)
Oktober 16
Seite 48
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
a) Projekt-Teamzusammenstellung sowie Auswahl des Beraters
b) Kontenplan neu + Mappingmethode 1. Mapping Meldedaten2. Mapping Konsolidierungsdaten
c) Software-Auswahl (Planungssystem)
d) Ein- oder Zwei-Systemlandschaft (BCS vs. BPC)
e) UKV + funktionale Sicht – Abbildung auch auf ERP-Ebene Kostenstellen- und Profitcenter-Standardisierung
Oktober 16
Seite 49
6. Wesentliche EntscheidungenL
ösu
ng
san
satz
• Erweiterung des bestehenden Kontenplans (GuV) zur Abbildung der UKV-Struktur+ Direkte Verfügbarkeit der neuen GuV-Struktur im System+ Keine Matrix-Denkweise (Kostenart / UKV-Zeile) notwendig– Anzahl der Konten erhöht sich (Stammdatenpflege)
• Alternative: Abbildung der UKV-Struktur als Matrix (Kostenart / UKV-Zeile) Komplexe Überleitungsdenkweise bei gleicher Anzahl an benötigten Datenfeldern Ergebniszeile Gross Profit / Bruttoergebnis nicht unmittelbar verfügbar
UKV-Nr.Bestehende
KontenNeue
Kontonr.+ =
Oktober 16
Seite 50
8. Technische Realisierung
EC-EC-PCAPCA
HRHR
COCO
PCPC
Fertigungs -auftrag
Prozess
Innen -auftrag
Material-bewertungKosten -
stelle
Pro
fit-Ce
nte
r-R
ech
nu
ng
Produktkosten-Controlling
Gemeinkosten -Controlling
Personal-wirtschaft
COCO
OMOM
COCO
PAPAErgebnis -objekt
Finanz-buchhaltung
Finanz-buchhaltung
Anlagen WIP ErlösFIFI
Bestand
MaterialArbeit OH Prozess
KostenartenrechnungKostenartenrechnung
Beschaffung Fertigung Lager Vertrieb
Ergebnis -rechnung
Oktober 16
Quelle: cellent AG
Seite 51
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
Lokale ERP-Systeme
SAP ERP 6.0 SAP Bus.One … Kingdee … Quickbooks
Mapping Algorithmus
z.B. ∑Personal-aufwand
SEM-BCS
Professional Planner
BW-Cube UKV Report
Werte in €
Aufteilung Funktionsbereichs-Kosten gemäß lokalem
RechnungswesenA
llo
ka
tio
n in
%
• Übereinstimmung mit IFRS
• IC-Partner Information• Konzern-Daten• Saisonalisierung• PP-Planung nutzbar
Vo
rte
ile
Vertrieb
- Personalkosten- …
Marketing
- Personalkosten- …
F&E
- Personalkosten- …
Oktober 16
Seite 52
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
Jed
ox
Lu
caN
et
macs
So
ftw
are
Mic
roso
ft
Mic
ro
Str
ate
gy
MIK
Ora
cle
Pan
ora
ma
So
ftw
are
Pre
vero
Pro
Co
s
PS
T
Qu
ilkV
iew
SA
P
SA
S In
sti
tute
Tag
eti
k
Th
inkin
g
Netw
ork
s
ton
bell
er
Funktionsumfang
Dashboarding X X XX XX XX XX XX X XX X XX XX XX XX
Reporting XX X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX X XX X XX XX X X XX
Mobile Reporting X X X X X X X X X X X X XAnalyse XX X X XX XX XX XX XX X XX X XX XX XX X XX
Planung XX XX XX X XX XX X XX XX (X) XX XX XX XX X
Konsolidierung XX XX X (X) XX XX XX XX
Regionale Ausrichtung
DACH x x x x x x xEuropa (x) (x) x x xWeltweit x (x) x (x) X (x) x x x (x) (x)
Kundenfokus
KMU x x x x x x (x) x x x x x x x x x xGroßkonzerne x (x) (x) x x x x x x x x x (x)
XX = Schwerpunkt des
Anbieters
X = im Funktionsumfang
(X) = setzt auf der Lösung
eines anderen
Anbieters auf bzw.
OEM-Produkt
► Marktübersicht BI-Lösungen / Lösungsportfolio ausgewählter Anbieter (2/3)
Oktober 16
Seite 53
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
► Die Übersicht berücksichtigt nur die IST-Daten; Plan-Daten inkl. Prognose werden seit dem 15. Juli 2015 im UKV-Format in BPC erfasst und konsolidiert (vereinfachte Budget Konsolidierung)
Oktober 16
Seite 54
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
► Die Übersicht berücksichtigt nur die IST-Daten; Plan-Daten inkl. Prognose werden seit dem 15. Juli 2015 im UKV-Format in BPC erfasst und konsolidiert (vereinfachte Budget Konsolidierung)
Oktober 16
Seite 55
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
► Funktionale Sicht auf Basis einer harmonisierten Kostenstellen-Organisation
COSMO: UKV-Sicht gemäß IFRS vs. Funktionale Sicht TransitionvonGKV zu UKVKonten-Ansicht Kostenstellen der Legal-Einheiten
Total Vertrieb/Marketing
Service Produktion Prod.Entw. Logistik Einkauf IT HR Finanzen Overhead UKV-Sicht
Konten:
Personalausgaben 610 230 10 40 50 50 50 60 10 10 100 Umsatzkosten 92
Abschreibung 50 50 Vertriebskosten 494
… 0 Administration 353
Andere operative Ausgaben350 160 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 110 F & E 71
Gesamtaufwand 1.010 390 20 50 60 60 60 120 20 20 210 s. b. Aufwand 0
Allokation % IT (z.B.) 0% 30% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% -100% 10% 10% 0% s . B. Ertrag 0
Allokation absolut. 0 33 11 11 11 11 11 -110 11 11 0 EBIT 1.010
Gesamt inkl. IT Allokat. 1.010 423 31 61 71 71 71 10 31 31 210
Funktionale Sicht
Vertrieb 390
Service 20
Operations 170 = Produktion + Logistik + Einkauf
Produktentwickl. 60
IT 120
HR 20
Finanzen 20
Overhead 210
Total 1.010
Oktober 16
Seite 56
6. Wesentliche Entscheidungen
► Struktur der Funktionalen Sicht
Ka
ffe
e-S
erv
ice
Ele
ktro
kle
ing
er.
Ko
nsu
mg
üte
r
Ho
tel
Ka
ffe
e M
asc
h.
Die funktionelle Ansicht weist lediglich die Primären Kosten aus
Vertrieb
Service
Marketing
Produkt-entwicklung
V.+M. Sonstige
Management
Vertrieb und Marketing
Produktion
Logistik
Einkauf
Sonstige
Management
Operations
IT
Finanzen
Management
HR
Admin. Sonstige
Administration
Oktober 16
Seite 57
7. IFRS- und Konsolidierungsfragen
► Lösungsoption 3: Mapping der TG-Werte nach Konzernlogik
UKV Logistik-dienstleister
Vertriebs-gesellschaft
Summen-abschluss
Eliminie-rung
Konsolidierter Abschluss
Umsatz 100 100 -100 0
Umsatzkost.
Vertrieb -100 -100 -200 +100 -100
Verwaltung
SBE
SBA
EBIT 0 -100 -100 0 -100
GKV Logistik-dienstleister
Vertriebs-gesellschaft
Summen-abschluss
Eliminier-ung
Konsolidierter Abschluss
Umsatz 100 100 -100 0
Personal -70 -70 -70
Material -30 -30 -30
Bez. Leistungen
0 -100 -100 +100 0
EBIT 0 -100 -100 0 -100
Ko
ste
na
rte
nU
KV
-Ze
ile
n (
Ma
pp
ing
)
1
1
Mapping der Kosten des Logistik-dienstleisters in die UKV-Zeile Vertrieb da sie aus Konzernsicht für den Vertrieb angefallen sind.
2
Mapping der Eliminierung analog zu zugrunde-liegendem Konto
2
Ve
rtrieb
Ve
rtrieb
Ve
rtrieb
Option 3: LE Mapping derGruppenlogik folgend
• Keine separate Logik für das Mapping der Konsolidierung notwendig
• Die technische Implemen-tierung ist weniger kompliziert
• LE Präsentation gemäß der UKV-Methode nicht möglich.
• Nur für bestimmte Geschäftseinheiten möglich.
+
-
Oktober 16
Seite 58
7. IFRS- und Konsolidierungsfragen
• Dient in der Buchhaltung als Anleitung zur einheitlichen Kontierung
• Definiert einen Katalog von möglichen Geschäftsvorfällen und gibt vor, welche Konten des Kontenplans für diese Geschäfts-vorfälle zu verwenden sind
• Definiert, welche Kontierungs-merkmale (z.B. Kostenstellen, Kunden-aufträge) berücksichtigt werden müssen (Pflichtkontierung) oder dürfen (optionales Kontierungs-merkmal)
• Vorgabe von (konzernweit einheitlichen) Methoden zurBilanzierung
• Enthält für die Positionen des (Konzern-) Kontenrahmens Definition, Ansatzkriterien und Bewertungs-kriterien (initial, fortlaufend) sowie ggf. weitergehende Ausweispflichten (z.B. Fristigkeiten o.ä.)
• Enthält häufig Vorschriften zum Ablauf des Abschlussprozesses
• Grundlage für die konsistente Überführung der Einzelabschlüsse auf den Konzernabschluss
• Definition, Zielsetzung, Anwendungs-bereiche von Steuerungsgrößen
• Vorgaben von Controlling-Strukturenwie z. B. GBU, BU, Vertriebswege,Länder, Warengruppen, Kosten-stellenorganisation für funktionale Sicht
• Vorgabe von Methoden/Prozessen:• Prognose, Planung + Vorschau• Terminplan• Diverse Planungsparameter• Definition LE-Verrechnungspreise• Kalkulationsschema• Profitabilitätsanalysen• Entscheidungsfindung bei z. B. In-
vestitionen Preisfindung etc.• Incentive-Regelungen (tbd.)
• Inhalt• Umfang (Konzern, LE)• Kostenplanung (Budget, IST, Prognose)• Verantwortlichkeiten…
Finance & Controlling – Handbuch
Kontierungsrichtlinie(Legale Einheit dem lokalen Recht entsprechend)
Kontierungsrichtlinie(Konzernebene der IFRS-UKV-Methode)
Controlling Manual(Konzernebene der IFRS-UKV-Methode)
Roter Rahmen = COSMO-Scope
(Erste Priorität)
Gelb = von der Konzernzentrale bereitgestellt
Grundlage für
Oktober 16
Seite 59
7. IFRS- und Konsolidierungsfragen
► Dokumente mit Richtlinien- oder Planparameter-Charakter in Sharepoint-Portal realisiert
Icon „Handbook Fi/Co“
Oktober 16
Seite 60
7. IFRS- und Konsolidierungsfragen
Neue GuV Struktur gemäß UKV
Neu: Sonder-Themen
Oktober 16
Seite 61
8. Technische Realisierung
► BPC Release 10.0
► NetWeaver Version 740
► Betriebssystem AIX 7.1
► Unicode ja
► CITRIX-Version 7.9
► Office 2013 inkl. aktuelle Patche
► Logische Partition auf einer
Power 740, 30 GB RAM, 300 GB Disks
► Datenbank MaxDB 7.9
Oktober 16
Seite 62
8. Technische Realisierung
* GBU = Konsum, Kaffeemaschinen, Hotel** BU = z. B. Kaffeemaschinen-Vertrieb, Kaffeemaschinen-Service
Konzern / GBU* /
BU**
Region/ Land
Vertriebs-kanäle
Marke/Waren-
gruppe**
Intercompany-Partner
Umsatz (Vertrieb) x x x x
Umsatzkosten x x x x
Bruttoergebnis zu Standardkosten x x x x
Umsatzkosten (Varianzen) ( x )
Bruttogewinn x
Vertriebskosten x (x)
F&E Kosten x (x)
Verwaltungskosten x (x)
Sonst. betriebl. Erträge x (x)
Sonst. betriebl. Aufwendungen x (x)
Regionaler Ergebnisbeitrag x
Overhead-Kosten x
EBIT x
x
Oktober 16
Seite 63
8. Technische Realisierung
SAP SEM BCS SAP BPC
Umsatz nach Business-Units und IC-Partnern
Vorbereitung der BCS-Struktur und Hochladen in BCS mittels Excel-Interface
Umsatz nach Business-Units, Vertriebskanälen, Ländern,
Produktgruppen und IC-Partnern (kombiniert)
3. Arbeitstag +1 Arbeitstag 2. Arbeitstag
- GuV - Bilanz
- Personalstatistik- Investitionen
- Sonstige stat. Informationen
CSM-Mapping und Hochladen der Daten inBPC mittels automatischem Interface
- GuV - Bilanz
- Personalstatistik- Investitionen
- Sonstige stat. Informationen
7. Arbeitstag +4 Arbeitstage (circa) 11. Arbeitstag
Keine Daten Keine DatenUmsatzkosten nach Business-Units,Vertriebskanälen; Kurz-GuV nach
Ländern, Funktionale Sicht
13. Arbeitstag
PrognoseDaten-Eingabe durch Up-Load-Files und/oder via BPC-Eingabe-Masken
Neues Reporting≥15th Arbeitstag
+Konsolidierung+Konsolidierung
2016Dateneingabe durch
KonzerngesellschaftenProzess-Steuerung durch
BeteiligungscontrollingDatentransfer via
Schnittstellenprogramm
2017: Konzern-Reporting fertig am 10. Arbeitstag, 5 Tage weniger als 20162017
Oktober 16
Seite 64
9. Lessons Learned
• Der Erfolg des Projekts hängt vom gesamten Projektteam ab
• Ohne die besten SAP-Berater zu haben, hat WMF ihre Ziele
dennoch erreicht
• Parallel-Projekte (z.B. Shareholder Verkaufs-Prozess) hatten einen hemmenden
Einfluss auf die Verfügbarkeit der WMF-Know-How-Träger
• Eine längere Projekt-Laufzeit hätte sicherlich zu einer besseren IT-Lösung mit einer
potenziell deutlich höheren System-Leistungsfähigkeit führen können (z.B. BPC 10.1 /
weniger Dimensionen)
Kompetenz
Engagement
Stress-Resistenz
Verfügbarkeit
Oktober 16
10. Fragen oder Hinweise?
5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 66
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Oktober 16
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 67
Disclaimer & My Background
McDonald’s global revenue VS.
Value of U.S. exports of non-edible fishery product
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 68
Digital is the mega-trend of our time, but the explosive growth and impact has barely begun
Digital trends impacting Finance
Finance
Big data
Value-driven analytics
3D-printing
Internet of things
► Much less BI required; significantly simplified IT architecture
► Self-service fruition
► Line-item detail available in real time
► Finance systems need to be able to capture and process data from a variety of IoT sources
► Analytics will enable new insights into performance, with predictive capabilities
► Analytics will require other skills and finance roles than today
► 3D printing will enable local “production” of goods that still need to be controlled end-to-end
► Tax and duty questions also arise
Cloud computing / mobile apps
Cyber security
► Mobile payment will be the norm; Finance systems need to be able to capture payments from all sources
► Blockchain will enable peer to peer financial transactions
► Cloud and mobile will be the norm
► Stronger process and system standardization required
► Cyber security will become a board agenda topic
► RPA and AI will significantly reduce the number of finance resources required
Robotics / AI
Mobile payments / Blockchain
1
2
3
4
5
8
6
7
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 69
It’s no longer a debate… analytics excellence drives significant economic returns and competitive advantage
*Source: Economic Intelligence Unit. Survey conducted with 530 senior executive across industries (Feb 2013)
77% companies ‘good’ with analytics are also ahead in YOY growth compared to peers
None
None
Substantially ahead
Somewhat ahead
On par
Somewhat behind
Substantially behind
23%
49%
28%
2010
2011
2012
37%58%
67%67% companies gained a significant competitive advantagefrom using analytics (15% increase
from last year and 80% increase from two years ago)
*Source: MIT Sloan Management Review Survey conducted with more than 2500 executives across industries (Mar 2013)
Financial performance of companies ‘good’ with analytics
% of companies indicating a competitive advantage with Analytics
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 70
CFOs are facing new and diverse challenges … and analytics can help drive tangible business value
Three-year change in EBITDA
A recent survey1 of 652 CFOs finds that the use of data and analytics is associated with improved financial performance -- companies who give analytics a very high priority have had higher EBITDA growth over the past three years
1 “Partnering for Performance, Part 3: the CFO and the CIO”, EY 2015
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 71
Essentially, Data Analytics helps on five different kind of questions
Is this A or B?1Is this weird?2 Hoch much
– or –How many?3
How is this organized?4What should I do next?5
Each one of these questions is answered by a separate family of machine learning methods, called algorithms.
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
18° C
?24° C22° C
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 72
Claude Monet Vincent Van Gogh
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Experience how machine learning works
Seite 73
Claude MonetVincent Van Gogh
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Who is the painter?
Seite 74
Claude Monet Vincent Van Gogh
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Who is the painter?
Seite 75
Vincent Van Gogh
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Who is the painter?
Seite 76
1 + 4 = 5
2 + 5 = 12
3 + 6 = 21
8 + 11 = ?
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Choices:
A) 40
B) 19
C) 96
D) Another number
Pattern Detection – Which alternative is correct?
Seite 77
1 + 1 * 4 = 5
2 + 2 * 5 = 12
3 + 3 * 6 = 21
8 + 8 * 11 = 96
1 + 4 = 5
2 + 5 + 5 = 12
3 + 6 + 12 = 21
8 + 11 + 21 = 40
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Pattern Detection
Seite 78
Applying Data Analytics…starts with Business QuestionAvoid the “Wikipedia Approach"
• Identify the appropriate mathematical algorithms to help uncover patterns within the data
• Compare the results and insights from these alternative techniques
• Choose the most effective visualization technique to convey the key communication topics
• Translate the results back to the business problem
• Infer actionable insights• Take action, inform decisions• Measure results and initiate iterative
improvement, extensions and continuous monitoring of efficiency
• Prioritize the data needed• Identify the relevant and available data
sources• Analyze possible gaps (i.e. missing
important data) and identify possible alternative sources
• Assess the data quality• Prepare, consolidate and set-up the data
• Understand the problem • Address it in a way that it becomes clear
which insights needs to be discovered• Formulate the corresponding business
questions
Business Analysts with industry knowledge and finance problem domain knowledge
Data Manipulation, Management and Governance Professionals
Business Stakeholders and Analysts, Analytics Support organisation (CIO)
Data Modelers, Mathematicians, Statisticians (Data Scientists)
Framing the Business Problem
Taking Action & Measurement Analytics & Visualisation
Information Collection
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 79
Finance Performance & Management Reporting
Procure to Pay
General Accounting
Financial & External Reporting
Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting
Operational Accounting
Policy, Controls, Governance & Compliance
Internal Audit
Treasury
Capital Management & Investment
Tax Planning & Accounting
Investor Relations
Get a deep understanding of the business and its dynamics to serve the business better
OperationsCustomerFinancials
► `
People Social EnvironmentBrand
Data Analytics
BIG DATA & ANALYTICSIT - TECHNOLOGIES
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 80
► Determining the most critical KPIs that drive performance, to allow leadership to focus on the measures that matter
► Integrating operational, market and financial data to create forward-looking business insights
► Changing the way financial information is consumed, using visualization and interactive dashboards with the ability to “drill down” into root causes
► Identifying levers to improve operational efficiency of core finance shared services activities (reducing T&E spend, improving efficiency of A/R and A/P, etc.)
► Improving the speed and agility of the financial close, resulting in more time to analyze results and provide insights
► Uncovering control, non-compliance and fraud issues
► Using analytics to identify the key drivers for driver-based planning
► Predictive modelling to better forecast EPS and support scenario planning
► Enhancing the planning/forecast process by automating certain parts of the plan
► Enhancing analytical capabilities to draw insights critical to the CFO agenda: (liquidity planning, developing pricing strategies, improving working capital, managing indirect expenses, reducing accounts receivable, etc.)
► Enabling data-driven decisions, instead of relying on instinct and gut-feel
Finance organizations are using analytics in four main ways to become better business partners
Decision support
Financial planning and forecasting
Finance operational
improvements
Management reporting and visualization
Business value
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 81
Some illustrative examples of Finance Analytics
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 82
Enabling and foundational capabilities
People
Acquire the right people with analytics focus, multi-disciplinary skillset. Invest in building capabilities in data science, math,and financial modelling.
Tools
Adopt the right analytical toolset for data mining,integration, modelling and visualization. Standardize at the enterprise level
Data Governance
Make data a fourth pillar of the business, and leverage it as an asset. Improve data quality programs and governance policies and standards to build confidence and reliability
Culture
Analytics requires a cultural shift in mindset and ways of working across the organization to embed data driven decision making in a repeatable, systematic way
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
To make analytics sustainable, finance needs to consider people, technology, data governance and culture
Seite 83
The current level of analytics maturity for the enterprise overall will help guide how finance begins its journey
Emerging Developed Advanced
Data/TechnologyBU-level data, data management not a key priority, poor data governance
Enterprise deployment of analytical tools; master data management initiatives underway
Relentless pursuit of new data and metrics. Data viewed as strategic asset
PeoplePockets of analytics talent but not pervasive
Senior leaders recognize the importance of analytics and developing analytic capabilities
Strong leaders behaving analytically and showing passion for analytical competition
InitiativesDisparate initiatives, not all of strategic importance or prioritized
Value-generating initiatives prioritized and executed across the organization
Analytics integral to company strategy
Enterprise approach (governance)
Localized analytics, local value
Hybrid operating model to empower BUs with corporate coordinating and enabling key capabilities across
Analytics tools and infrastructure extended broadly and deeply across enterprise
How finance can start on analytics
Identify quick wins to demonstrate the value of analytics and build credibility; find partners in the business to collaborate on analytics initiatives
Identify high-value areas to generate analytics insights;leverage existing analytics resources and tools from across the organization
Use the organization’s focus on data and analytics as a mandate to invest in finance’s capabilities; consider how analytics can transform the finance organization and function
Analytics maturity of the broader organization
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Seite 84
Your Contact Person
Oktober 16 5. Finance Performance Day
Torsten Kiewert
Executive Director
Ernst & Young GmbHWirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Arnulfstraße 59
80636 München
Telefon: 0160 939 13974
Email: [email protected]
Seite 85
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Oktober 16
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance Day
Seite 86
Vorausschau: Termine für den 6. FPD (Frühjahr 2017)
5. Finance Performance DayOktober 16
Mittwoch, 26. April 2017
EY Düsseldorf
Graf-Adolf-Platz 1540213 Düsseldorf
Dienstag, 9. Mai 2017
EY Stuttgart
Flughafenstraße 6170629 Stuttgart
Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2017
EY Frankfurt
Mergenthalerallee 3–565760 Frankfurt am Main
Seite 87
Agenda
Einführung 09:30
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 2) 11:00
Digitalisierung (Robotics) im Finanzbereich (Teil 1) 09:35
10:45
11:45
Analytics und die zukünftige Rolle der Finanz- und IT-Funktion 12:45
Die Umstellung im Konzern auf Umsatzkostenverfahren
Pause
Schlusswort 13:30
Business Lunch 13:45
Oktober 16
Pause
12:00
5. Finance Performance Day