Transcript
Page 1: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

Feasibility of Outpatient FullyIntegrated Closed-Loop Control

First studies of wearable artificial pancreas

Featured Article:

Boris P. Kovatchev, Ph.D., Eric Renard, M.D., Ph.D., Claudio Cobelli, Ph.D., Howard C. Zisser, M.D., Patrick Keith-Hynes, Ph.D., Stacey M. Anderson, M.D., Sue A. Brown, M.D., Daniel R. Chernavvsky, M.D., Marc D. Breton, Ph.D., Anne Farret, M.D., Ph.D., Marie-Josée Pelletier, M.D., Jérôme Place, M.S.C., Daniela Bruttomesso, M.D., Ph.D., Simone del Favero, Ph.D., Roberto Visentin, M.S.C.,

Alessio Filippi, M.D., Rachele Scotton, M.D., Angelo Avogaro, M.D., Ph.D., Francis J. Doyle III, Ph.D.

Diabetes Care Volume 36: 1851-1858

July, 2013

Page 2: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

STUDY OBJECTIVE 

• To evaluate the feasibility of a wearable artificial pancreas system, the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs)

• System uses a smart phone as a closed-loop control platform

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 3: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

• 20 patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled at the Universities of Padova, Montpellier, and Virginia and at the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

• U.S. studies were conducted entirely in an outpatient setting• Studies in Italy and France were hybrid hospital–hotel

admissions• A continuous glucose monitoring/pump system was placed

on the subject and was connected to DiAs• Patient operated the system via the DiAs user interface in

open-loop mode (first 14 h of study), switching to closed-loop for the remaining 28 h

• Study personnel monitored remotely via 3G or WiFi connection to DiAs and were available onsite for assistance

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 4: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 5: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

RESULTS

• Total duration of proper system communication functioning was 807.5 h (274 h in open-loop and 533.5 h in closed-loop)

• 97.7% of the total possible time from admission to discharge represented

• Predetermined primary end point of 80% system functionality was exceeded

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 6: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 7: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

CONCLUSIONS

• Contemporary smart phones are capable of running outpatient closed-loop control

• Future steps should include equipping insulin pumps and sensors with wireless capabilities, as well as studies focusing on control efficacy and patient-oriented clinical outcomes

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 8: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 9: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858

Page 10: Feasibility of Outpatient Fully Integrated Closed-Loop Control

Kovatchev B. P. et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1851-1858