8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
1/8
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
v.
RITA CRUNDWELL.
Defendant,and
SHAWN ORTGIESEN AND ANGELAORTGIESEN,
Third-Party Citation Respondents.
)
)))))))))))
)))
Case No. 12 CR 50027
Judge Philip G. Reinhard
UNITED STATES PETITION FOR RELIEFAGAINST SHAWN AND ANGELA ORTGIESEN
The United States, by Zachary T. Fardon, United States Attorney for the Northern
District of Illinois, petitions this Court for relief against respondents Shawn Ortgiesen and Angela
Ortgiesen to assist its enforcement of the judgment entered against Rita Crundwell in the captioned
matter. The United States seeks a judgment against the Ortgiesens based on several defaulted
loans defendant made to respondents. In further support of its petition, the government states:
PARTIES
1. Petitioner is the judgment creditor, the United States of America.
2. Defendant Rita Crundwell pled guilty to one count of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. '1343)
and thereafter this Court sentenced her to a term of incarceration and to pay $53,740,394 in
restitution to her victim.
3. Third-party citation respondents Shawn Ortgiesen and Angela Ortgiesen are
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1186
8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
2/8
2
married and residents of the Northern District of Illinois. The Ortgiesens owe Crundwell money.
JURISDICTION
Subject Matter
4. The district court had subject matter jurisdiction over the underlying criminal case
against Rita Crundwell which among other things established her criminal restitution liability
under 18 U.S.C. 3231 (providing original jurisdiction . . . of all offenses against the laws of
the United States). The district court has jurisdiction over the supplementary proceedings under
28 U.S.C. 1331, 1345 (federal question jurisdiction and United States as plaintiff) and 18
U.S.C. 3612(c) (authorizing the United States to enforce restitution orders). Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 3613(a), (f) & 3664(m) (1) (A) (i), the United States may enforce a restitution judgment
according to the practices and procedures for enforcing civil judgments under federal law.
Personal
5. The Court has personal jurisdiction over respondents in this post-judgment
enforcement proceeding based on third-party citations to discover assets served on each of them
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 69. Doc. Nos. 144 and 169 (proofs of service). Rule 69 incorporates
into federal law state post-judgment enforcement procedures. The incorporated state procedures
in this district are ' 2-1402 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2-1402) and
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 277, the state statutes and rules governing supplementary procedures.
6. On June 11, 2013, Shawn Ortgiesen appeared personally at the offices of the United
States Attorney for examination by counsel for the United States pursuant to a third-party citation
to discover assets. At that time, he stipulated to the fact that he had borrowed money from Rita
Crundwell and that a substantial portion of it remains unpaid. Having personally appeared and
answered respondent has accordingly submitted to the jurisdiction of the court.
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:1187
8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
3/8
3
7. On August 28, 2014, Angela Ortgiesen appeared personally at the offices of the
United States Attorney for examination by counsel for the United States pursuant to the third-party
citation to discover assets. At that time, she stipulated to the fact that she had borrowed money
from Rita Crundwell and that a substantial portion of it remains unpaid. Having personally
appeared and answered respondent has accordingly submitted to the jurisdiction of the court.
BACKGROUND
The Criminal Judgment and Lien
8. In May 2012, an indictment was returned in the captioned criminal case against
Rita Crundwell charging her with a massive wire fraud scheme. The indictment charged that the
City of Dixon, Illinois employed defendant as its comptroller. As comptroller, she supervised the
City of Dixons finances, and from 1990 through April 2012, defendant used her position as
comptroller to embezzle about $53.7 million. The defendant pleaded guilty to the charges
pursuant to a written plea agreement.
9. On February 14, 2013 this Court sentenced Crundwell to 235 months in prison.
The Court further ordered her to pay restitution in the amount of $53,740,394 to the city of Dixon
(D.E. No. 70). She is currently incarcerated in Waseca, MN.
10. Upon entry of judgment a lien arises on a defendants property and rights to
property and that judgment lien binds his property as if it were a federal tax lien. 18 U.S.C.
3613(c); United States v. Hosking, 567 F.3d 329 (7th Cir.2009) (property the IRS can reach to
satisfy a tax lien, a sentencing court can also reach). Unlike an ordinary judgment lien which
when recorded simply binds real property, a 3613 judgment lien extends to both real and
personal property. United States v. Swan, 467 F.3d 655, 656 (7th Cir.2006) (citing26 U.S.C.
6321; applying tax lien principles to a 3613 judgment). The judgment lien is entitled to priority
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:1188
8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
4/8
4
vis-a-visother lien creditors when properly recorded. 18 U.S.C. 3613(d).
11. In this case, the government recorded its notice of lien against the defendants
property and rights to property on March 7, 2013 (notice of lien recorded in the Rock County, WI
Register of Deeds Office as document number E 1972564) and on March 15, 2013 (notice of lien
recorded in the Lee County, IL Clerk & Recorders Office as document number 2013001434).
The Citation Proceedings
12. On May 16, 2013, the United States served a citation to discover assets on Shawn
Ortgiesen.
13. Pursuant to the citation, on June 11, 2013 Shawn appeared personally at the offices
of the United States Attorney to be examined under oath as to the assets of Rita Crundwell. He
appeared again on July 16, 2014.
14. At the citation examination, Shawn responded to questions regarding the financial
transactions between him and Rita Crundwell and in substance stated that: beginning in about
November 2008 and continuing through January 2012 he and his wife, Angela, obtained a series of
loans from Rita Crundwell totaling $182,862 with and interest rate of 4%. Some of the loans
were documented with a promissory note and all the loans were evidenced by a cancelled check for
Crundwell to one or both of the Ortgiesens. The notes and instruments evidencing the loans were
made exhibits and verified by the respondent. Shawn further stated that the loans are all in
default.
15. On August 11, 2014, the United States served a citation to discover assets on
Angela Ortgiesen.
16. Pursuant to the citation, on August 28, 2014 Angela appeared personally at the
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:1189
8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
5/8
5
offices of the United States Attorney to be examined under oath as to the assets of Rita Crundwell.
At the citation examination, Angela endorsed Shawns testimony as to the loans Crundwell made
and the amounts owed.
17. The government prepared a summary of the loans defendant made to the Ortgiesens
which is attached as Exhibit A. The summary details the total principal amount, loaned
incrementally over time, of $182,862, payments and credits of $23,458, and the resulting balance
due of $181,690with interest accruing after December 9, 2014 at a rate of $18.17 per day.
COUNTS FOR RELIEF
Rules and Procedure
18. Proceedings to enforce fines and restitution are excluded from the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure and are thus conducted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed. R.
Crim. P. 1(a) (5) (C) and 18 U.S.C. 3613(a) & (f).
19. District courts may entertain civil, postjudgment supplementary proceedings
within an underlying criminal case in order to enable government to collect restitution. United
States v. Kollintzas, 501 F.3d 796, 80203 (7th Cir.2007).
20. In supplementary proceedings a trial court may enter judgment against a third party
if the record contains some evidence that the third party possesses assets of the judgment debtor.
Pyshos v. Heart-Land Development Co., 630 N.E.2d 1054 (Ill. App. 1994); Lange v. Misch, 598
N.E.2d 412 (Ill. App. 1992) and O'Connell v. Pharmaco, Inc., 493 N.E.2d 1175 (Ill. App. 1986).
COUNT I
The United States realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs one (1) through
twenty (20) above as paragraphs one (1) through twenty (20) of this Count I.
21. The governments 3613 judgment lien attached to the debts owed by the
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:1190
8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
6/8
6
Ortgiesens to Crundwell as represented by the defaulted loans.
22. The government seeks a judgment on the defaulted loans the Ortgiesens owe to
Crundwell so that it may enforce the resulting judgment debt, by execution or otherwise, and apply
whatever money is recovered to the restitution judgment entered in the captioned criminal matter
against Crundwell.
Wherefore, the United States requests this Court to:
a) Find the facts in favor of the United States and against Shawn and Angela Ortgiesen;
b) Enter judgment in favor of the United States and against the respondents, Shawn andAngela Ortgiesen, jointly and severally, in the amount of $181,690plus prejudgment
interest of $18.17 per day from December 10, 2014 through the date of judgment; and
c) Grant any other relief the circumstances may require.
Respectfully submitted,
ZACHARY T. FARDONUnited States Attorney
By: /s Joseph A. StewartJOSEPH A. STEWARTAssistant United States Attorney
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:1191
8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
7/8
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned Assistant United States Attorney hereby certifies that in accordance with FED. R.CIV. P. 5, LR5.5, and the General Order on Electronic Case Filing (ECF), the following document:
United States Petition for Relief Against Shawn and Angela Ortgiesen
was served pursuant to the district courts ECF system as to ECF filers, if any, and were sent byfirst-class mail on December 10, 2014, to the following non-ECF filers:
Shawn Ortgiesen Angela Ortgiesen
Rita CrundwellBOP #44540-424FCI Waseca
P.O. Box 17311000 University Drive S.W.Waseca, MN 56093-0741
s/ Joseph A. StewartJOSEPH A. STEWARTAssistant United States Attorney
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:1192
8/10/2019 Ortgiesens Turnover Motion-redact
8/8
LOAN SUMMARY ASSUMPTIONS
12/9/2014
LOAN SUMMARY
Total payments $23,458.45
Total interest payments $2,829.97
Total principal payments $20 628.48
Total unpaid interest $17,149.86
Total unpaid principal $162,233.64
Total unpaid loans $179,383.50
Interest from 8/1 forward to todays date $2,307.32
Total unpaid balance as of today s date $181,690.83
Interest per diem $18.03
Total Ortgiesen Loans $182,862.12
ASSUMPTIONS
1) Payments applied first to accrued interest and then to the outstanding loan balance
2) Assumed 4% interest on all loans
3) Interest accrued to 6/11/2013, date of appearance pursuant to citation
4) Assumed date of loan # 9 was 12/15/2009 - No promissory note provided
5) Assumed request for $10,865 on 12/7/2011 was denied by Rita Crundwell
6) Payments for loans # 1-7 applied as follows:
Loan #1
Loan #1
Loan #1
Loan #1 & 2
Loan #1 & 2 - 2 pay
Loan # 1, 2, & 3
Loan # 1, 2, & 3
Loan # 1, 2, & 3
Loan # 1, 2, & 3
Loan # 1, 2, & 3
Loan # 1, 2, & 3
Loan # 5
Loan # 5
Loan # 6
Loan #10
Loan #10
Loan #10
Additional payments 2,650.00
per documentation provided 2,422.50
by Shawn
dated 8/1/2014 23,458.45
EXHIBIT A
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 198 Filed: 12/10/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:1193