Transcript
Page 1: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

Integrated lidar backscatter:Quantifying the occurrence

of supercooled water andspecular reflection

Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

• Enhanced algorithm for supercooled water detection (Hogan et al. 2003, QJ in press)

• Specular reflection could be a problem for nadir-pointing EarthCARE lidar: how common is it?

Page 2: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

Introduction

• The integrated backscatter through a cloud of optical depth of is approximately (Platt 1973):

– k is the extinction/backscatter ratio (18.75 sr for droplets) is the multiple scattering factor (~0.7 for the CT75K)

• For large optical depth it reduces to (2k)-1

• If z1 and z2 encompass the 300 m around the strongest echo in a profile, we can identify thin liquid water layers with greater than, say, 0.7

21

212

1

ek

dzz

z

Page 3: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth
Page 4: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth
Page 5: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

Results for lidar 5° from zenith

• Chilbolton 2000– Occurrence of supercooled layers with > 0.7

Page 6: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

Results for zenith pointing lidar

• Chilbolton 1999– Enhanced occurrence between -10 and -20°C

Page 7: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

Supercooled water in models

• A year of data from the Met Office and ECMWF– Easy to calculate occurrence of supercooled water with > 0.7

Page 8: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

Specular reflection

• Specular reflection from planar crystals can occur within 1° from zenith or nadir– Enhanced backscatter with no accompanying increase in

extinction: very low k – Integrated backscatter in ice can exceed the asymptote

corresponding to optically thick liquid cloud (recall ~(2k)-1)

• To quantify, require lidar to be precisely at zenith: 20 days of data obtained so far at Chilbolton– Algorithm calculates integrated backscatter from 2 km up– Specular reflection deemed to occur if this integral is more than

1.05 times the asymptote for liquid water– Excess above this value is attributed to pixels with highest – But allowance made for common scenario of liquid above ice

Page 9: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth
Page 10: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth
Page 11: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth
Page 12: Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth

Results

• Around 23% of ice cloudy profiles strongly affected– Specular reflection in 20% of

cloudy pixels at 4 km– Big problem for interpreting

backscatter measurements

• Must analyse more data– Use model for temperature:

specular reflection only for plates between -9 and -23°C?


Recommended