22
Grouping Students

Grouping students

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

grouping

Citation preview

Page 1: Grouping students

Grouping Students

Page 2: Grouping students

Different groups

• Crowding, fixed furniture and entrenched students attitudes, may make grouping problematic.

Page 3: Grouping students

Whole – class teaching

Advantages of whole – class grouping:

o It reinforces a sense of belonging among the group members.

o It allows teachers to “gauge the mood” of the class in general.

o If language learning is a collective endeavour, then “learning takes place more effectively when language classes pull together as unified groups”.

Page 4: Grouping students

Disadvantages

• It favors the group rather than the individual.

• Individual students do not have much chance to say on their own.

• Many students are disinclined to participate in front of the whole class.

• It may not encourage students to take responsibility for their own learning.

• It is not the best way to organized communicate language teaching.

Page 5: Grouping students

Seating whole classes

ORDERLY ROWS

• The teacher has a clear view of all students.

• It is perfect for: explaining grammar, watching a video or a Power Point.

Page 6: Grouping students

Horseshoe:

• Small groups.

• The teacher will probably be at the open end of the arrangement since that may well be where the board, overhead and computer are situated.

Circle:

• It makes a quite a strong statement about what the teacher and students believe in.

Page 7: Grouping students

Separate tables:

• Group work is easy to arrange.

• Useful in mixed-ability classes.

• Difficult to teach in whole-group activities.

Other seating arrangements:

• Enemy corners: two groups get into opposite corners of the room.

• Opposing teams, and face to face : where students sit in rows in rows to make pairs.

Page 8: Grouping students

Students on their own

• Such individualized learning is a vital step in the development of learner autonomy.

Page 9: Grouping students

Advantages of individualized learning:

• It allows teachers to respond to individual student differences.

• It is less stressful for students to perform.

• It can develop learner autonomy.

• It can be a way of restoring peace and tranquility to a noisy and chaotic classroom.

Page 10: Grouping students

Disadvantages:

• It does help a class develop a sense of belonging.

• It takes much more time than interacting with the whole class.

Page 11: Grouping students

Pair Work Advantages:

• Increases the amount of speaking time any one student gets in class.

• Allows teachers to work with 1 or 2 pairs while other students continue working.

• “Two heads are better than one”.

• Relatively quick and easy to organize.

Page 12: Grouping students

Disadvantages:

• It is very noisy.

• The chances of misbehavior are greater with pairwork than in a whole class setting.

• It is not always popular with students.

• Choosing a partner can be problematic.

Page 13: Grouping students

Groupwork:

Students can:

•Write a story.

•Create a role-play.

•Watch, write or perform a video sequence.

Page 14: Grouping students

Advantages:• Increases the number of talking opportunities.

• Personal relationships are less problematic.

• It encourages broader skills of cooperation and negotiation than pairwork.

• It promotes learner autonomy.

• Students can choose their level of participation.

Page 15: Grouping students

Disadvantages:

•It is noisy.

• Not all students enjoy it.

• Individuals may fall into group roles that become fossilized.

• Groups can take longer to organize than pairs.

Page 16: Grouping students

Ringing the changes:

• The task: Many tasks suggest obvious student groupings, we can usually adapt them for use with other groupings.

• Variety in a sequence: It helps to provide a variety, thus sustaining motivation.

• The mood: Changing the grouping of a class can be a good way to change its mood when required.

Page 17: Grouping students

Organizing pairwork and groupwork

• Making it work:

We can come with an agreement about when and how to use different student groupings.

When we know how our students feel about pairwork and grouping, we can decide, as with all action research, what changes of method, if any, we need to make.

Page 18: Grouping students

Creating pairs and groups

• Friendship: Friends should sit with friends.

• Streaming: Pairwork should have a mixture of weaker and stronger students.

• Chance: It demands little pre-planning, and, by its very arbitrariness, stresses the cooperative nature of working together.

Page 19: Grouping students

•The task: Tasks determine the make up of the pairs or groups.

•Changing groups: Just because we put students in groups at the beginning of an activity does not mean that they have to stay in these groups until the end.

• Gender and status: In some contexts it may not be appropriate to have men and women working together.

Page 20: Grouping students

Procedures for pairwork and groupwork

• Before: Giving the students a time when the activity should finish, and then sticking to it.

• During: Monitoring going around the class.

• After: We need to organized feedback. We want them to discuss what occurred during the groupwork session and, where necessary, add our own assessments and make corrections.

Page 21: Grouping students

Troubleshooting• Finishing first: We need to have a series of challenging task-related extensions for early finishers, so that when a group has finished early, we can give them an activity to complete while they are waiting.

• Awkward groups: We can separate best friends for pairwork; we can put all the high-status figures in one group.

Page 22: Grouping students

One way of finding out about groups, in particular, is simply to observe, noting down how often each student speaks.