54
Understanding the Bright and Dark Side of one’s Work Life: The Critical Role of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Maarten Vansteenkiste Universiteit Gent Contactadres: [email protected] www.vopspsy.ugent.be www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT

Maarten Vansteenkiste 2008

  • View
    3.753

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Maarten Vansteenkiste's presentation Thoughts on Happiness 2008

Citation preview

  • Understanding the Bright and Dark Side of ones Work Life:

    The Critical Role of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction

    Maarten Vansteenkiste

    Universiteit Gent

    Contactadres: [email protected]

    www.vopspsy.ugent.be

    www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT

    *

  • Overview

    The Energetic Basis of Growth: Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction

    3. How to Create an Optimally Motivating Environment?

    2. Quality of Motivation Matters

    *

  • PART I

    The Energetic Basis of Growth:

    Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction

    Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (in press). Self-determination theory and the explanatory role of psychological needs in human well-being. In L. Bruni, F. Comim, & M. Pugno (Eds.), Capabilities and happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    *

  • Motivating Employees

    *

  • Legend / Parabel

    A jewish tailor opened a store in the main shopping street in a small town. A local clan was not very happy with this. A lot of people didnt visit the main shopping street any longer, because a group of youngsters was shouting each day in front of the store: Jew, Jew, Jew

    The tailor didnt sleep very well during the first night, but then decided to do something about the problem the next day. He went to the youngsters and promised them that they would get one dollar each day in case they would shout Jew, Jew, Jew. The young boys started to shout at him and, as a result, he paid each of them one dollar. Because the youngsters were quite satisfied with the reward, they came back the next day to shout at him. The store keeper came outside and paid them again: I can only pay you half a dollar. One dollar is too much. Although they only got half a dollar, the boys were satisfied with the reward and left the shopping street. After all, half a dollar is half a dollar.

    Of course, the youngsters came back to shout at the store keeper the next day. This time, they were paid one dollar cent. This is not fair, argued the youngsters, two days ago, we still got one dollar and yesterday we got half a dollar, but today we only get one cent. Take it or go away, replied the store keeper, this is all what you can get. Dont think we will any longer shout at you for one stupid dollar cent, said the youngsters, and they didnt come back any longer to shout at the store keeper.

    *

  • Task of motivation psychologist

    Motivation < movere = to move

    Which things make people moving? Question concerning the reason, motive or goal behind ones behavior Does this motive matter in terms of predicting Productivity? Quality and quantity of performance? Burn-out & engagement?Doing overhours = Free persistence at the activity? Turn-over?

    *

  • Identification of

    weaknessesillness pathology

    Disease models

    Positive

    Psychology

    movement

    Identification of

    strengths virtues positive development

    Remedial action =

    fixing what is wrong

    Preventive action = by stimulating growth avoiding illness

    Criticism: A strong meta-theoretical foundations is lacking in both

    perspectives; Self-determination Theory can fill this gap

    Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psichologia, 27, 17-34.

    *

  • Self-Determination Theory

    Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (in press). Self-determination theory and the explanatory role of psychological needs in human well-being. In L. Bruni, F. Comim, & M. Pugno (Eds.), Capabilities and happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Prof. Dr. Edward L. Deci

    Prof. Dr. Richard M. Ryan

    *

    *

  • Self-determination Theory: Meta-theoretical assumptions

    Pro-active organism that acts upon his environment

    Oriented towards growth & self-organization

    Social environment facilitates & supports development

    Passive / reactive entities

    No inherent growth-oriented nature

    Social environment programs & controls peoples behavior

    Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (in press). Self-determination theory and the explanatory role of psychological needs in human well-being. In L. Bruni, F. Comim, & M. Pugno (Eds.), Capabilities and happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    *

  • Psychological

    need satisfaction

    Well-being

    Burn-out

    Productivity

    Social

    environment

    Turn-over

    Which processes underly growth vs. alienation?

    *

  • Wich needs do meet the following criteria?

    Psychological

    Innate

    Fundamental

    Universal

    Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (in press). Self-determination theory and the explanatory role of psychological needs in human well-being. In L. Bruni, F. Comim, & M. Pugno (Eds.), Capabilities and happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    *

  • Basic needs

    Need for autonomy

    A

    Being the initiator of

    ones own actions

    Psychological

    freedom

    Volition

    Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (in press). Self-determination theory and the explanatory role of psychological needs in human well-being. In L. Bruni, F. Comim, & M. Pugno (Eds.), Capabilities and happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Need for competence

    C

    Being able to

    achieve desired

    outcomes

    Having control over

    the result of ones

    actions

    Need for belongingness

    B

    Being loved by

    others

    Having close and

    intimate relations

    *

  • Psychologisal

    need satisfaction

    Self-worth

    Psychological

    insecurity

    Hedonic

    pursuit of

    happiness

    Autonomy

    Belongingness

    Competence

    Money &

    Financial

    success

    BASIC

    COMPENSATORY / DERIVATIVE

    *

  • Demographic Characteristics of the Participants in the Calibration and Validation Sample

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Soenens, B. (in progress). Capturing autonomy, belongingness and competence at work. Manuscript in preparation.

    Calibration SampleValidation SampleSample 1Sample 2N297202192Gender Male495150 Female594850Age Range21 63 years20 61 years24 59 years Mean38.45 years41.60 years SD11.54 years10.26 yearsEducation Primary education 2%3%1% Secundary education45%60%13% College level45%31%51% University12%7%35%Type of contract Full-time74% Part-time26%

    *

    *

  • Utilitarian roots

    Hedonic

    Well-being

    Eudaimonic

    Well-being

    Aristotelian roots

    Fromm (1981)

    Optimal well-being requires distinguishing between those desires that are only subjectively felt and whose satisfaction leads to momentary pleasure, and those needs that are rooted in human nature and whose realization is conducive to human growth and produces eudaimonia, i.e., well-being. (Italics added; as cited in Ryan & Deci, 2001)

    *

  • Hedonic

    Well-being

    Eudaimonic

    Well-being

    Maximization of happiness & pleasureMinimization of painFullfilling ones daimon or true natureFully functioning person

    Bentham

    Kahneman et al. (1999)

    Diener & Lucas (1999)

    Waterman (1993); Ryff (1995)

    Fromm (1981); Ryan & Deci (2001); Ryan, Huta, & Deci (2008)

    Indicators

    Positive affectNegative affect Life satisfaction

    Indicators

    Vitality Self-actualization Personal expressiveness

    *

  • Engagement

    Burn-out

    Actual

    turn-over

    Need satisfaction among employees (correlates)

    A

    B

    C

    .66***

    .44***

    .27***

    -.49***

    -.38***

    -.28**

    -.07

    -.13*

    -.27***

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Soenens, B. (in progress). Capturing autonomy, belongingness and competence at work. Manuscript in preparation.

    *


  • Autonomy in non-western countries: Separating autonomy from independence

    *

  • 1) Autonomy within SDT

    = degree of self-endorsement of ones actions

    = standing fully behind ones activities

    = reflective valuation of ones behavior

    Opposite = control = feeling pressured or seduced to partake in an activity

    2) Autonomy within developmental (Steinberg, 1990), cross-cultural (Markus & Kitayama, 1991, 2003) and health and occupational psychology

    = self-direction, individualism

    = being independent

    = culture-bounded (i.e., western cultures), age-bounded (i.e., adolescents)

    Opposite = dependency = relying on others

    BUT: autonomy and independence are orthogonal dimensions!

    *

  • 4 combinations are possible!

    Examples

    Doctor visitHelp with carrying out a project at work

    Controlled or imposed

    Autonomous of self-chosen

    Dependence

    Independence

    *

    *

  • Psychological

    Well-being

    Depression

    Vitality

    Need satisfaction among Chinese students (regressions)

    A

    B

    C

    .26***

    .28***

    .26***

    -.31***

    -.43***

    .03

    .25*

    .31**

    .19*

    Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Luyckx, K. (2006). Autonomy and relatedness among Chinese Sojourners and Applicants: Conflictual or independent predictors of well-being and adjustment? Motivation and Emotion, 30 273-282

    *

  • PART II

    Quality of Motivation Matters

    *

  • Psychological

    need satisfaction

    Quality &

    quantity of

    motivation

    Autonomy

    Belongingness

    Competence

    *

  • Exercise: Try to

    indicate which items would measure the same type of motivation come up with a label for each type of motivation

    *

  • Im putting effort in my job

    because that is what others (e.g., manager, colleagues) expect me to be doing 12345 because this job allows me to reach my life goals12345 because I would feel guilty if I wouldnt do so12345 because I like this job very much12345 because this job has personal relevance to me12345 because others (e.g., manager, colleagues) will reward me only if do so 123457) because I find this job highly interesting and challenging123458) because I can only be proud of myself if I do so12345

    *

  • ItemsNaamMotivation type 1Motivation type 2Motivation type 3Motivation type 4

    *

    *

  • ItemsNaamMotivation type 11, 6External pressureMotivation type 23, 8Internal pressureMotivation type 32, 5Personal values,convictionsMotivation type 44, 7Pleasure, passion,enjoyment

    *

    *

  • Intrinsic Motivation: Doing an activity because it is interesting and provides its own reward by satisfying peoples basic needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

    Extrinsic Motivation: Doing an activity because it is instrumental to an operationally separable consequence.

    *

  • Autonomous Motivation

    Controlled

    Motivation

    Pressure, obligation, stress

    Choiceful, psychological freedom

    Unneccessary

    Pleasure, passion, interest

    Personal relevance, meaningful

    Intrinsic Motivation

    Extrinsic motivation

    Punishment rewards

    expectation

    Shame, guilt, self-worth

    Partial internalisation

    No internalisation

    Full internalisation

    *

  • Motivational profiles:
    Distinguishing between types of employees

    *

  • Variable-centered

    approach

    Autonomous Motivation (AM)

    Controlled

    Motivation (CM)

    Person-centered

    approach

    Types of

    employees?

    *

  • Sample characteristics:

    Representative Belgian sample of employees: N = 1793Gender: 52.4% maleAge< 30 year: 24.6%30-39 year: 25.6%40-49 year: 28.4%> 50 year: 21.4%Educational level:Primary education: 5.5%Secundary education: 55%College level: 24.8%University level: 14.7%

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Van Coillie, H. (in progress). Examining employees motivational profiles: Does quality or quantity of motivation matter? Manuscript in preparation.

    *

    *

  • Poor quality

    Low quantity

    High

    quantity

    Good quality

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Van Coillie, H. (in progress). Examining employees motivational profiles: Does quality or quantity of motivation matter? Manuscript in preparation.

    *

    *

  • Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Van Coillie, H. (in progress). Examining employees motivational profiles: Does quality or quantity of motivation matter? Manuscript in preparation.

    Low quality

    (21%)

    Low quantity

    (11%)

    High quantity

    (27%)

    High quality

    (41%)

    *

    *

    Grafiek1Lage kwaliteit (21%)Lage kwantiteit (11%)Hoge kwantiteit (27%)Hoge kwaliteit (41%)VerkoopProcentual distribution of motivation groups21112741Blad1VerkoopLage kwaliteit (21%)21Lage kwantiteit (11%)11Hoge kwantiteit (27%)27Hoge kwaliteit (41%)41Als u de afmetingen van het gegevensbereik van de grafiek wilt wijzigen, versleept u de rechterbenedenhoek van het bereik.
  • Is being more strongly motivated a

    Is being motivated always adaptive?

    Two relevant comparisons:

    Good quality vs. poor quality group = equal in amount but different in quality of motivationGood quality vs. high quantity motivation group = different in amount and in quality of motivation

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Van Coillie, H. (in progress). Examining employees motivational profiles: Does quality or quantity of motivation matter? Manuscript in preparation.

    *

  • Need satisfaction as a function of motivational profile

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Van Coillie, H. (in progress). Examining employees motivational profiles: Does quality or quantity of motivation matter? Manuscript in preparation.

    Comparison 2

    *

  • Organisational Commitment as a function of motivational profile

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Van Coillie, H. (in progress). Examining employees motivational profiles: Does quality or quantity of motivation matter? Manuscript in preparation.

    Comparison 2

    *

  • Productivity as a function of motivational profile

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Van Coillie, H. (in progress). Examining employees motivational profiles: Does quality or quantity of motivation matter? Manuscript in preparation.

    Comparison 2

    Comparison 1

    *

  • PART III

    How to create a motivating environment?

    *

  • Psychological

    need satisfaction

    Job design

    Leadership

    style

    Renumeration

    policy

    *

  • Job Design:

    Need enhancing & need frustrating job characteristics

    *

  • Resourceful

    job characteristics

    = stimulate growth

    & play buffering

    role

    Demanding

    job characteristics

    = Tax employees

    capacities

    Engagement

    Burn-out

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & De Witte, H. (2008). The role of basic need satisfaction in explaining the relation

    between demands, resources, well-being and engagement. Work and Stress, 22, 277-294.

    +

    +

    -

    *

  • ?

    Resourceful

    job characteristics

    (e.g., task autonomy,

    skill utilization etc.)

    Demanding

    job characteristics

    (e.g., emotional & physical

    demands, workload etc.)

    Engagement

    Burn-out

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & De Witte, H. (2008). The role of basic need satisfaction in explaining the relation

    between demands, resources, well-being and engagement. Work and Stress, 22, 277-294.

    *

  • Psychological

    need satisfaction

    Resourceful

    job characteristics

    (e.g., task autonomy,

    skill utilization etc.)

    Demanding

    job characteristics

    (e.g., emotional & physical

    demands, workload etc.)

    Engagement

    Burn-out

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & De Witte, H. (2008). The role of basic need satisfaction in explaining the relation

    between demands, resources, well-being and engagement. Work and Stress, 22, 277-294.

    +

    +

    -

    -

    *

  • Psychological

    need satisfaction

    Resourceful

    job characteristics

    Demanding

    job characteristics

    Engagement

    Burn-out

    Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & De Witte, H. (2008). The role of basic need satisfaction in explaining the relation

    between demands, resources, well-being and engagement. Work and Stress, 22, 277-294.

    .34***

    .86***

    -.15**

    .62***

    Fit: SBS-chi (196) = 738.94, p < .001; RMSEA = .06; SRMR = .08, CFI = .93 and NNFI = .92

    *

  • Leadership style:

    Need enhancing & need frustrating job leadership styles

    *

  • Need frustrating

    leadership style

    Need satisfying

    leadership style

    Leadership style

    that facilitates employees need

    satisfaction

    Leadership style

    that thwarts employees need

    satisfaction

    Leadership style

    *

  • Autonomy

    Beloningness

    Competence

    Autonomy-

    supportive vs.

    controlling environment

    Warm vs. cold environment

    Structured vs. chaotic

    environment

    *

  • Autonomy support

    External control

    Procedure

    Experimental design: 2X1-designParticipants : 376 first year business students (19-20 years old)Task: Reading a text on how to learn to communicate? (30 min.)Outcomes:Performance = conceptual learningPersistence = visiting the library to get additional information

    Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy-support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260

    *

  • Autonomy-supportive instructions

    On your desk you can find a text that is used in the context of an experiment. The text aims to indicate how you can learn to communicate in a good way. Different communication styles are discussed within the text and the content of this text might provide you useful information that you might need on your future job. You are invited to read the text attentively, because the text can contribute to your personal development and growth on your future job. After you will have read the text, you will be asked to answer a few questions (which are not part of an exam).

    Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy-support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260

    *

  • Controlling instructions

    On your desk you can find a text that is used in the context of an experiment. The text indicates how you should communicate in a good way. Different communication styles are discussed within the text and the content of this text should provide you useful information that you should use on your future job. You might better read the text very attentively, because the text should contribute to your personal development and growth on your future job. After you will have read the text, you must answer a few questions (which are not part of an exam).

    Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy-support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260

    *

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy-support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260

    *

    Grafiek1Autonomy-supportive contextControlling contextType of Communication StyleConceptual learningConceptual Learning as a Function of Type of Communication Style6.75.6Sheet1Autonomy-supportive contextControlling context6.75.6Autonomy-supportive contextControlling context670%42%Sheet1Tyoe of Communication StyleConceptual learningConceptual Learning as a Function of Type of Communication StyleSheet2Sheet3
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy-support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260

    *

    Chart1Autonomy-supportive contextControlling contextType of Communication StylePercentage of PersistencePersistence as a Function of Type of Communication Style0.70.42Sheet1Autonomy-supportive contextControlling context70%42%Sheet1Type of Communication StylePercentage of PersistencePersistence as a Function of Type of Communication StyleSheet2Sheet3
  • Conclusion

    Need satisfaction

    Crucial theoretical mechanism to explain both bright & dark sideConcrete practically relevant process by which the environment might enhance peoples growth & development

    *

    Persistence as a Function of Type of Communication

    Style

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    Autonomy-supportive contextControlling context

    Type of Communication Style

    Percentage of Persistence

    Mean

    1,00000

    0,50000

    0,00000

    -0,50000

    -1,00000

    -1,50000

    Controlled motivation

    Autonomous motivation