35
Peritoneal Dialysis Indications and Limitations By Mostafa Abd_Elsalam, MD

peritoneal dialysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis Indications and Limitations

ByMostafa Abd_Elsalam, MD

Page 2: peritoneal dialysis

Stage GFR Description

1 >90 Kidney damage with normal or increased GFR

2 60-89 Kidney damage with mild GFR fall

3 30-59 Moderate fall in GFR

4 15-29 Severe fall in GFR

5 <15 or RRT Established renal failure

Classification of CKD according to GFR

Page 3: peritoneal dialysis

.

Managing New Patient with ESRD

Page 4: peritoneal dialysis

Prof. MacLeod:

4

“Patients whose kidney fail require life-saving treatment with dialysis or with a kidney transplant.

Although dialysis is now very advanced, allowing more patients to be treated successfully, it is also very expensive.

It is essential, therefore, to ensure that resources are used as effectively as possible.”[1]

[1] Khan I., MacLeod A. Towards cost-effective dialysis therapy in Europe: the need for a multidisciplinary approach. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12: p. 2483

Page 5: peritoneal dialysis

The word preitoneum refers to the Greek word

“peritononion” and means to stretch. Ancient Egypt were probably the first people to get a look

at the peritoneum

1st steps towards peritoneal dialysis.

Page 6: peritoneal dialysis

Preservation of RRF

Higher Hb concentration

Less risk of acquiring blood borne infections e.g. HCV

Better quality of life

Why to start with PD ?

Page 7: peritoneal dialysis

Travel , employment

It allows expansion with limited resources

Lower staff / patient ratio

Page 8: peritoneal dialysis

saves vascular access

preferred for children (APD)

Page 9: peritoneal dialysis

Things to Remember

ESRD is life-long ordeal• Access problems • Higher morbidity and mortality

Survival lines• One PD membrane • 4 sites for permanent vascular access• Two iliac for transplantation

Page 10: peritoneal dialysis

“The right modality at the right time.” Peter Blake, MD, John Burkart, MD

“Complementary Not Competitive” Coles 1998

Page 11: peritoneal dialysis

PD versus HD Which is best?

• PD may best be seen as a therapy for early years of dialysis with HD being used as a back up if or when PD fails

• This approach which has recently been called “integrated dialysis care” has economic as well as medical advantages

Page 12: peritoneal dialysis

CAPD Advantages

• Medical

• Lifestyle

• Economic

Page 13: peritoneal dialysis

Economic

• Paradoxically, however the difference is greater in poorer developing countries and least in wealthier countries .

Page 14: peritoneal dialysis

LIFESTYLE

• Given free choice , because it involves less daytime procedures and so less disruptive .

• Exceptions are people who are nervous about machines or who have difficulty staying in bed .

Page 15: peritoneal dialysis

• Patient Preference . • Availability And Convenience.• Underlying Medical Problems

and Comorbid Conditions.• Socioeconomic and Dialysis

Center Factors.• The Patient's Home Situation• Medical staff Training.

Selecting RRT modalities is influenced by a number of

considerations such as

Patient selection

Page 16: peritoneal dialysis

• Those wanting a lifestyle with more freedom and flexibility

• Those with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or hypertension

• Patients who live a long way from their dialysis unit and /or who have had problems with hemodialysis

• Individuals whose peritoneal membrane can handle the daily needs of this option

Page 17: peritoneal dialysis

11% of all dialysis patients are treated with PDPD distribution differs significantly between countries

Global dialysis patients

HD – PD patient distribution

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%2013

2,522,000

11%

89%

100%0% 80%40% 60%20%

USA

ChinaJapan

Thailand

Egypt

Korea

FranceItaly

Turkey

Malaysia

Brazil

GermanyMexico

TaiwanIndia

PDHD (countries ordered according to dialysis patient population)PDHD

ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis. Fresenius Medical Care annual report 2013, available at: http://www.fresenius.com/191.htm, accessed September 2014

Page 18: peritoneal dialysis
Page 19: peritoneal dialysis
Page 20: peritoneal dialysis

Perl J, Wald R, McFarlane P, et al. Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the associated between dialysis modality and survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:1113-1121

Page 21: peritoneal dialysis
Page 22: peritoneal dialysis

PD Patients Have an Initital Survival Advantage Relative to HD. Danish Registry 2001

05

101520253035

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

HDPD

Time (years)

% m

orta

li ty

J Heaf, NDT 2002

4921 patients

Page 23: peritoneal dialysis

While the issue of survival differences between the twomodalities remains unsettled, it is clear that utilizing PDat the initiation of dialysis will slow the decline in residualrenal function and may provide a sur vival advantage withinthe first years of dialysis.J. Kevin Tucker, MD, is MedicalDirector of the Peritoneal DialysisProgram at Brigham andWomen’s Hospital

Peritoneal Dialysis First: PD ShouldBe Considered for Dialysis Initiation

Nephrology Times May 2009

Page 24: peritoneal dialysis

better maintenance of residual renal

function

Better maintenance of residual renal function

Page 25: peritoneal dialysis

What Are the Benefits of Preserving RRF?

Reduces Mortality

Contributes to total solute clearance (1 ml/min CrCl = 10 liter CrCl/week)

Facilitates volume control

Allows for more liberal diet and

fluid intake

Provides endocrine functions

Improves 2-microglobulin

and middle molecule clearance

Improves nutritional status

Improves QOL

Increases total Na removal

Davies, S. 2000

Page 26: peritoneal dialysis
Page 27: peritoneal dialysis

Most Patients Are Medically Eligible for PD

Netherlands 83% and U.S.A 76%

The prevalence of medical contraindications to PD (23% to 24%) is similar to the 17% to 21% reported … from other parts of the world

Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al. The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in the Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43:891-899.Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Vonesh E, et al. Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis.. Kidney Int. 2005;68:378-390

Page 28: peritoneal dialysis

7%

13%16%

19%23%

31%

44%47%

50%

35%

25%

5%2%2%

0%

17%

8%12%

34%

5%

15%

20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

McIntyr

e

Brugna

noCha

nJo

nas

Cantu

Dusso

lBarr

ilNeto

Selgas

Huang

Yoshid

a

HD PD

Pereira KI 1997;51:981-999

Prevalence of anti-HCV Among Patients on Dialysis by Modality

Page 29: peritoneal dialysis

40 Nurses per 100 HD-patients.

4 Nurses in the Out-patient Clinic per 100 PD-patients.

Saving 36 nurses

Logistics of PD versus HD

Logistics of PD versus HD

Page 30: peritoneal dialysis

Transports

Hospitalisation

Pharmaceuticals (e.g. EPO)

Equipment costs (Lease, depreciation,

maintenance)

Disposables

Labor

Water Treatment

Infrastructure

Transports

Hospitalisation

Pharmaceuticals (e.g. EPO)

Equipment costs

Disposables

Labor

Infrastructure

Schematic RRT Cost Comparison Available ModalitiesHe

m o PD

Page 31: peritoneal dialysis

Modality Cost Comparison in KSA

Page 32: peritoneal dialysis
Page 33: peritoneal dialysis
Page 34: peritoneal dialysis
Page 35: peritoneal dialysis

A great man once said, “Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer…”