15
www.efquel.or g Qualität von MOOCs Ulf-Daniel Ehlers Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg (www.dhbw.de) European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning (www.efquel.org) Campus Innovation Hamburg 2013

Qualität von MOOCs

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Vortrag auf der Campus Innovation in Hamburg 2014 "Qualität von MOOCs"

Citation preview

Page 1: Qualität von MOOCs

www.efquel.org

Qualität von MOOCsUlf-Daniel EhlersDuale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg (www.dhbw.de)European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning (www.efquel.org)

Campus Innovation Hamburg 2013

Page 2: Qualität von MOOCs

Digitale (R)Evolutionen in der HS

MOOCs als dritte digitale (R)evolution1. E-Learning Hype Anfang des

Milleniums Lernumgebungen2. OER Peak ab 2007

“Giving away knowledge for free“3. MOOC Peak ab 2010

“Giving away education for free“

Page 3: Qualität von MOOCs

Die Qualitätsdebatte

Alle digitalen (R)evolutionen führen zu einer Qualitätsdebatte• Von der digitalen und

technologischen Innovation• Über den Wandel der

Lehr-/Lernkultur• Zu Qualitätsfragen und

Innovations-strategien

Page 4: Qualität von MOOCs
Page 5: Qualität von MOOCs

Qualität von MOOCs...?!

• (Wie) kann man sie messen?• Was sind Qualitätskriterien?• Gute MOOCs – schlechte MOOC?• Was sind wertvolle MOOCs?• Sind sie besser, je massiver?• Sind sie besser, je niedriger die Dropout-

Quote?• Sind Dropouts eigentlich überhaupt ein

Kriterium für Qualität von MOOCs?

Page 6: Qualität von MOOCs

Das „MOOC Quality Project“

12 Wochen, 12 Expertes, 12 Posts, 15.000 Leser, >150 Kommentare m

ooc.e

fqu

el.o

rg

Page 7: Qualität von MOOCs

1. „Massive“ Zielgruppen? • „Change from „no target audience“-

thinking to having one in mind, even if it is wide. Take into acount new participation profiles.“

MOOC

Lurkers

Passive Teilnehmer

Aktive Teilnehmer

Drop-ins

HILL, P. (2013) “The Four Student Archetypes Emerging in MOOCs” [Online] e-Literate blog post 02/03/13 [accessed 19/04/13]. Available:

http://mfeldstein.com/the-four-student-archetypes-emerging-in-moocs/

Page 8: Qualität von MOOCs

www.efquel.org

2. Gemischte Gruppen?

• „Be aware that inviting the world means to bring in the worlds opinion (existing groups might be disturbed)“

• „Mixing campus and MOOC Students might be challenging: drive in/by learners vs. highly motivated learners who want a masters degree.“

http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

Page 9: Qualität von MOOCs

3. Vielfältige Lernkontexte

• „Be aware that the quality paradigm “fitness for purpose” is not working for MOOCs because MOOCs mean learning across contexts and purposes.“

• „Quality measures become individualised, quality methods like self- & peer-assessment and –reflection are suitable.“http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

Page 10: Qualität von MOOCs

www.efquel.org

4. Selbststeuerung als Qualitätsfaktor

„Be open about your requirements of self-organisation, provide scaffolding for those who lack that self-organisation.“

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Fugle%2C_%C3%B8rns%C3%B8_073.jpg

Page 11: Qualität von MOOCs

5. Transparenz schaffen

1. the degree of openness, 2. the scale of participation

(massification), 3. the amount of use of multimedia, 4. the amount of communication, 5. the extent to which collaboration

is included, 6. the type of learner pathway (from

learner centred to teacher-centred and highly structured),

1. the level of quality assurance,

2. the extent to which reflection is encouraged,

3. the level of assessment, 4. how informal or formal it

is, 5. autonomy, 6. and diversity.

„Be precise about the content and purpose of the MOOC (self-declaration) and keep promises!“ (MOOC description Beschreibungsmodell)

(Conole 2013)

Page 12: Qualität von MOOCs

6. Pädagogische Prinzipien

• „Use peer-to-peer pedagogy: peer-learning, peer-review, peer-assessment, collaborative learning, multiple learning pathways and exploratory learning.“

• „Understand that teaching is not a prerequsite of learning.“

http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

Page 13: Qualität von MOOCs

www.efquel.org

7. MOOCs sind „Choice-Based“

• „Get away from – the notion that „ending a MOOC early“ means

dropping out – looking at MOOCs like (structured, paced,

timebound) courses“

• „Be aware that MOOC learning is an opt-in/out learning model“

• „MOOCs follow voluntary sequencing and are based on choices. The choices they offer make their attractiveness.“

http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

Page 14: Qualität von MOOCs

www.efquel.org

Ausblick: MOOC-lernen anerkennen!

http://www.oer-europe.net

Page 15: Qualität von MOOCs

www.efquel.org

Danke!WWW.EFQUEL.ORG

EFQUEL office in BrusselsRue des deux Eglises 35B – 1000 BRUSSELSBELGIUMTel : + 32 2 639 30 32Fax : + 32 2 644 35 83Email : [email protected]

Released under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Belgium License

You are free:• to Share — to copy, distribute and

transmit the work• to Remix — to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.