124
Политика за паркиране и устойчиво управление на градската мобилност 1 Съдържание: Марчело Доковски, управител на отдел “Паркиране и мобилност”, Център по градска мобилност – Бъдещи предизвикателства пред управлението на паркирането в гр.София........................ стр.2 Проф. Дирк Лауерс, Университет на Гент Политика за паркиране и устойчиво управление на градската мобилност, европейска гледна точка.(на английски език)................. стр.10. Доц. д-р Елена Димитрова, УАСГ – Днешните български градове: градски трансформации и предизвикателства за мобилността........................................................... стр. 25 Емил Петров, Център по градска мобилност – Възможности и потенциал на ГИС за развитие на системите за управление на трафика в гр.София.................................................... стр.41 Доминик Гилис, Университет на Гент – Техники за обследване на паркирането, основа за формулиране на политики.(на английски език)....................................................................... стр.55 Николай Найденов, УАСГ – Изследване на паркирането в гр. Велико Търново......................................................... стр.63 Ерик Дюбоа, управителен директор на общинската служба по паркиране, гр. Антверпен – Устойчиво управление на паркирането в Антверпен. (на английски език).................................. стр.87 Ендрю Уолш, Асоцииран директор на Mott MacDonald Ltd - Интелигентни Tранспортни Системи (ITS) и трафик контрол, успешно управление на градската мобилност – опита на Обединеното Кралство. (на английски език)................. стр.107

Urban Mobility

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2009 Urban Mobility Conference, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Sofia (UACG)

Citation preview

Page 1: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

1

䈐䒠䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䏐䎀䍐:

䇀䌀䐀䑰䍐䎰䏠 䅀䏠䎠䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀, 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰 䏐䌀 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰 “䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠”, 䉠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䏰䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 – 䄐䒠䍀䍐䒐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰........................ 䐐䐠䐀.2

䇰䐀䏠䑀. 䅀䎀䐀䎠 䆰䌀䐰䍐䐀䐐, 䈰䏐䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䐠䍐䐠 䏐䌀 䄰䍐䏐䐠 – 䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠, 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䌀 䌰䎰䍐䍀䏐䌀 䐠䏠䑰䎠䌀.(䏐䌀 䌀䏐䌰䎰䎀䎐䐐䎠䎀 䍐䍰䎀䎠)................. 䐐䐠䐀.10.

䅀䏠䑠. 䍀-䐀 䅐䎰䍐䏐䌀 䅀䎀䏀䎀䐠䐀䏠䌠䌀, 䈰䄀䈐䄰 – 䅀䏐䍐䒀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐: 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䌀 䍰䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀...........................................................䐐䐠䐀. 25

䅐䏀䎀䎰 䇰䍐䐠䐀䏠䌠, 䉠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䏰䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 – 䄠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䎀 䏰䏠䐠䍐䏐䑠䎀䌀䎰 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐 䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀 䌠 䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰....................................................䐐䐠䐀.41

䅀䏠䏀䎀䏐䎀䎠 䄰䎀䎰䎀䐐, 䈰䏐䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䐠䍐䐠 䏐䌀 䄰䍐䏐䐠 – 䈠䍐䑐䏐䎀䎠䎀 䍰䌀 䏠䌐䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀 䍰䌀 䑀䏠䐀䏀䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䎀.(䏐䌀 䌀䏐䌰䎰䎀䎐䐐䎠䎀 䍐䍰䎀䎠)....................................................................... 䐐䐠䐀.55

䇐䎀䎠䏠䎰䌀䎐 䇐䌀䎐䍀䍐䏐䏠䌠, 䈰䄀䈐䄰 – 䆀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䌰䐀.䄠䍐䎰䎀䎠䏠 䈠䒠䐀䏐䏠䌠䏠......................................................... 䐐䐠䐀.63

䅐䐀䎀䎠 䅀䓠䌐䏠䌀, 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䍀䎀䐀䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䐐䎰䐰䍠䌐䌀 䏰䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐, 䌰䐀. 䄀䏐䐠䌠䍐䐀䏰䍐䏐 – 䈰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䄀䏐䐠䌠䍐䐀䏰䍐䏐. (䏐䌀 䌀䏐䌰䎰䎀䎐䐐䎠䎀 䍐䍰䎀䎠).................................. 䐐䐠䐀.87

䅐䏐䍀䐀䓠 䈰䏠䎰䒀, 䄀䐐䏠䑠䎀䎀䐀䌀䏐 䍀䎀䐀䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀 䏐䌀 Mott MacDonald Ltd -䆀䏐䐠䍐䎰䎀䌰䍐䏐䐠䏐䎀 T䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀 䈐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀 (ITS) 䎀 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠 䎠䏠䏐䐠䐀䏠䎰, 䐰䐐䏰䍐䒀䏐䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 – 䏠䏰䎀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䇠䌐䍐䍀䎀䏐䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䆠䐀䌀䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠. (䏐䌀 䌀䏐䌰䎰䎀䎐䐐䎠䎀 䍐䍰䎀䎠)................. 䐐䐠䐀.107

Page 2: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

2

䇀䄀䈀䉰䅐䆰䇠䅀䇠䆠䇠䄠䈐䆠䆀䈰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰

“䉠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䍰䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠” 䅐䇠䇠䅀䇰䏠䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐“䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠”

䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰05.10.2009䌰.

䄐䒠䍀䍐䒐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠

䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰

䄰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

䄰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏠䌐䑐䌠䌀䒐䌀䍀䌠䎀䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䑐䏠䐀䌀, 䐐䐠䏠䎠䎀 䎀 䐰䐐䎰䐰䌰䎀 䏰䏠

䏰䒠䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀, 䎠䌀䎠䐠䏠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠䍰䎀䑠䎀䏠䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐, 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䎀

䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐.

Page 3: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

3

䈀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䌀䈀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䌀 䐐䒠䐐 䍰䌀䍀䐀䒠䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀䐐䍐 䐐䒠䐐䐠䏠䎀 䌠

䏰䐀䏠䑀䍐䐐䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀䎀 䑠䍐䎰䍐䏐䌀䐐䏠䑰䍐䏐䌀 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䍐䏠䍀䏠䎰䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀䍀䎀䐐䏰䐀䏠䏰䏠䐀䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䏰䏠䐠䏠䑠䎀 䎀 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀. 䈀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䍐

䌠 3 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䎀 䏐䌀䐐䏠䎠䎀:

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠

䇠䑰䍐䐀䐠䌀䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䌀 䐀䏠䎰䓰 䏐䌀䌠䐀䒠䍰䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀

䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠, 䎀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䎀䍰䌀 䏐䌀䐐䒠䐀䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀

䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠.

Page 4: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

4

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠

§ 䄐䒠䐀䍰䎀䏐䌀

§䇐䌀䍀䍐䍠䍀䏐䏠䐐䐠

§䄠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䍰䌀 䏰䒠䐠䐰䌠䌀䏐䍐

§䉠䍐䏐䌀

§䆠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠

§䈐䎀䌰䐰䐀䏐䏠䐐䐠

䆀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠 䐐䍐 䌠䎰䎀䓰䍐䏠䐠 䐀䍐䍀䎀䑠䌀 䑀䌀䎠䐠䏠䐀䎀:

n 䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䒐䍐䎀䏀䌀䐠 䐐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐, 䌀䎠䏠 䐐䍐 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䌠䌀䐠䏠䐠䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀 䎀䏐䎀䑠䎀䌀䐠䎀䌠䎀 䍰䌀 䏰䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀䑠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐, 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䐐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍀䏠 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑰䌀䐐䐠䎀 䎀 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䑰䎀䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀

䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀.

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠

Page 5: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

5

n 䅐䍀䎀䏐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䍰䌀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

n 䈐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎰䎀䌠䎀 䏰䒠䐠䏐䎀 䍰䏐䌀䑠䎀

n 䆀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䎀 䍰䌀 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䌀䐠䌀䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 „䈐䆀䇐䋰䅰䇠䇐䄀” 䌠 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䐐䌀䎐䐠 䏐䌀 䅀䐀䐰䍠䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠–

www.sumc.bg

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠

n 䇰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䐐 䏰䐀䎀䍀䌠䎀䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠䌠䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䐀䓰䐠 䍀䏠 䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䏰䏠䌠䎰䎀䑰䌀䐐䎰䍐䍀

䐐䍐䌐䍐 䐐䎀 䌠䐐䍐 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䏐䌀䐐䐠䐀䏠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䎀䏐䍐䎀䍰䌐䍐䍠䏐䏠䌀䎠䐠䎀䌠䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀

䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䌀䍀䏀䎀䏐䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰.

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠

Page 6: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

6

䈰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀 䌠䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰

n 䈰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠䏀䐰 䍐 䌠 䐐䎰䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䎀䍐䏐䌀 䐀䍐䍀䎀䑠䌀 䑀䌀䎠䐠䏠䐀䎀:

§䆀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䏰䏠䍀䍐䏀

§䇐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䐀䍐䌀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䍀䏠䑐䏠䍀

§䇰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀

§䆰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䌀䎰䐠䍐䐀䏐䌀䐠䎀䌠䌀

n 䇐䌀䎐-䏠䌐䒐䏠, 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏰䏠 䐐䌠䍐䐠䌀 䍰䌀䐐䏰䐀䌀䌠䓰䏐䍐 䐐 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䌀, 䐐䌀 䍀䌠䌀 䌠䎀䍀䌀:

䈀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䌀

§ 䆠䌠䏠䐠䎀

§ 䉠䍐䏐䏠䌠䎀 䏀䍐䑐䌀䏐䎀䍰䏀䎀

Page 7: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

7

n 䈰䐐䒠䌠䒠䐀䒀䍐䏐䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 䐠䍐䑐䏐䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰䐠䌀 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

䈐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐

§ 䈀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䌠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐰䐐䎰䐰䌰䎀

§ 䇰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐

§ 䇠䏰䐠䎀䏀䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䏐䎀䓰䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐

§ 䇰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐

§ 䅀䍐䑀䎀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀 䎀 䐠䓰䑐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐

n 䄠䒠䌠䍐䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䍀 䏰䐀䎀 䍀䌠䎀䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䏠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䎠䏠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䏠䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐

n 䇠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䑀䍐䐀䍐䏐䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎰䎀䑠䌀 䐐䐰䌠䐀䍐䍠䍀䌀䏐䎀䓰

n 䈀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䎠䏠䏐䐠䐀䏠䎰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䍀䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 䍀䏠䏀䐰䌠䌀䒐䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀

n 䇠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䍐䒀䍐䑐䏠䍀䑠䎀䐠䍐

䇰䐀䍐䍀䎀䏀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䏐䌀“䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

Page 8: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

8

n 䅰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐀䍐䍀䐰䑠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐

n 䇠䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐

n 䈠䌀䎠䐐䐰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏰䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐

n 䅰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䎀䏐䌠䍐䐐䐠䎀䑠䎀䎀 䏰䏠 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠䎀

䐀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠䏐䌀 䍰䏠䏐䌀䐠䌀

䇐䍐䍀䏠䐐䐠䌀䐠䒠䑠䎀 䏐䌀“䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

n 䈀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀” 䎀䍰䌠䒠䏐 䍰䏠䏐䌀 䉠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀

n 䅀䎀䑀䍐䐀䍐䏐䑠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 䑠䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䍰䏠䏐䎀

n 䆀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰䎀 䎀 䌰䌀䐀䌀䍠䎀 䌠 䐠.䑰. 䏐䌀 䌐䌀䍰䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䏠-䑰䌀䐐䐠䏐䎀 䏰䌀䐀䐠䏐䓀䏠䐀䐐䐠䌠䌀䎀 䏰䐀䎀 䏐䏠䌠䏠䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠

n 䆀䏐䐠䍐䌰䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀 䏠䐠 䐠䎀䏰䌀 “Park & ride”(“䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎐 䎀 䐐䍐 䌠䏠䍰䎀”)

䇰䐀䎀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐠䏐䎀䏀䍐䐀䎠䎀 䍰䌀 䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰

Page 9: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

9

䄐䎰䌀䌰䏠䍀䌀䐀䓰 䍰䌀 䄠䌀䒀䍐䐠䏠䌠䏐䎀䏀䌀䏐䎀䍐!

䇀䄀䈀䉰䅐䆰䇠䅀䇠䆠䇠䄠䈐䆠䆀e-mail: [email protected]

Page 10: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

10

Parking policy and sustainable urban

mobility management A European point of view

Prof. Dirk LauwersDepartment of Mobility and Spatial Planning

Faculty of EngineeringGhent University

IntroductionLimitation of car traffic in towns needed:

--- Buchanan (1963): ‘Traffic in towns’:Traffic concepts such as ‘environmental capacity’ - ‘environmental areas’ – ‘loop model’--- D. Appleyard (1981): ‘Liveable streets’‘ecology of the street’ – ‘street battle’---practice: in many European cities new traffic schemes are

implemented, tram and bus lanes are introduced, car free trafficzones are installed

What makes that -after half a century insight and practice to master car traffic in towns- the search for new concepts and strategies

remains high on the research and policy agenda ?

Page 11: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

11

IntroductionTowards a new urban mobility culture

‘Cities all over Europe face similar problems (congestion, road safety, security, pollution, climate change due to CO2

emissions) and these problems are increasing constantly’

IntroductionTowards a new urban mobility culture

Parking policy as a leverage instrument? See ‘City Parking in Europe’ (Interreg IIIC)

Page 12: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

12

Increasing mobility pressureMobility in Europe has been increasing in logarithmic way for two

centuries

Source: Bleijenberg, A., 2002

Mobility growth is a strong a longstanding trend (like a naturalforce?)

Evolution of daily travelled distance per person between 1800-2000, except for walking (France)

Increasing mobility pressureTechnological improvements lead to higher speed

Source: Bleijenberg, A., 2002

During the past two centuries we gained distance (and space) butno time (time budgets spent for travel remain constant = ‘first

mobility law’)

Evolution of travel speed (door to door) for the different modes between 1900-2000 (the Netherlands)

Page 13: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

13

Increasing mobility pressureTechnological improvements lead to lower costs

Evolution of average travel cost for passenger transport (in

Source: Bleijenberg, A., 2002

Thanks to mass production of transport means + infrastructure more and more people can travel at lower and lower cost

Evolution of average travel cost for passenger transport (in euro)

Increasing mobility pressureSupporting factors of mobility increase

- Economic evolutions- Demographic factors- Socio-cultural factors- New spatial patterns- ‘Demand following’ government policy

Demand following policies of governments and cities are one of the causes of increasing urban mobility pressure

Page 14: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

14

Increasing mobility pressureDemand following policies as a supporting factor

Government policies have lead to dense networks and growing car traffic and car dependence

Increasing mobility pressureA century car ownership in Belgium – evolution of the car fleet

Source: FOD Econ (DIV), 2008

Quasi linear increase of car ownership over the past fifty years: the max. limit of S-curve fails to come

Page 15: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

15

Increasing mobility pressureIncreasing number of cars per household and per dwelling

Brussels 2008 Sofia 2009

Increasing pressure of parking of inhabitants on the public domain in urban areas (in Bulgaria but also in Belgium)

Evolution of parking policyEvolution urban parking policy related to car ownership evolution

Evolution scheme is useable as a benchmark instrument between cities

no specific policy

parking organizationlimitation parking timeparking for permit holdersdifferentiation of parkingtariffs

distant parking capacitymobility management

source: COST action 342 source: CROW

INTEGRATED

STEERING

DEMAND FOLLOWING

Page 16: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

16

Evolution of parking policyDifferences in urban parking policies : context and culture

Dialectics of progress

Evolution of parking policyIntegrated parking policy

Bron Lauwers, City Parking in Europe (2007) gebaseerd op COST

Parking policy in the frame of mobility policy and urban development policy

PARKING EVOLUTION

NO PARKING MEASURES TAKEN

PARKING REGULATION AND CONTROL

PAID PARKING TIME RESTRICTIONS

free of charge

RESIDENTs PARKINGSCHEMES

P + R

MOBILITY MANAGEMENT

URBAN PLANNING & MANAGEMENT

Page 17: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

17

Evolution of parking policyDevelopment of a ‘good practice’ of integrated parking policy

Parking projects : multimodal projects (Antwerp)– urban projects(Leuven)

Evolution of parking policyParking policy as a leverage instrument for sustainable modal split

Source City Parking in Europe Congress Santa Cruz 2005

Mobility management on the scale of an urban region require parking policy on the same policy level

Page 18: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

18

Products for integrated parking policy

Parking issues have to appear on different levels (planning,

Policy areas Urban development Parking

Planning Master plan, Mobility plan Parking plan

Management Management of urban development projects

Parking management

Design Quality of public domain Parking service for the user

Evolution of parking policy

Towards a new mobility culture

The European Green Paper on urban mobility identifies five challenges for the urban mobility policy

1 Towards free-flowing towns and cities2 Towards greener towns and cities3 Towards smarter urban transport4 Towards accessible urban transport5 Towards safe and secure urban transportSource : DG TREN Green paper on urban mobility (2007)

A new perspective on urban mobility means to develop "co-modality" between the different kinds of collective transport (train, metro, tram, bus, taxi) and individual transport (car,

motor, bike, walking)

Page 19: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

19

Towards a new mobility culture

Towards free-flowing towns and cities

– Lack of policy leads to cars searching for a parkingplace causing traffic congestion (1/3 of traffic

in downtown Brussels)– More and more cities in Belgium have introducedparking routing systems (dynamic guidance)

– Co-modality requires facilitating measuresfor free flowing public transport and biking routes andmeasures to manage (i.e. in most areas limiting ) the accessibility by car (= number of parking places, tariff and parking duration)The ‘City parking in Europe project’ shows that parking policy can

be a leverage instrument for a new mobility culture that is in the hands of the cities themselves

Towards a new mobility culture

Towards greener towns and cities

– Greening of the car fleet will lead to drastic decrease of emissions

– Growing understanding on the impact of traffic on health leads tointroduction of LEZs in several EU countries (e.g. 34 in Germany)

– Limiting of car traffic in urbanised areas is not only preliminary in expectation of cleaner cars: noise hindrance and occupation of space constitute structural problem for quality of city life

The ‘City parking in Europe project’ shows that parking policy can be a leverage instrument for a new mobility culture that is in the

hands of the cities themselves

Page 20: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

20

Towards a new mobility culture

Towards greener towns and cities

– Bologna is a best practice example of implementation of a restricted accessibility area in combination with parkingrestrictions (introduction in 1989, since 2005 with tele-monitoring)

– Good practice in European cities (Wien, Amsterdam, ….)shows the effectiveness of parking policy ‘an sich’ reductionof car traffic with 20% à 30% is feasible in downtown areas

The ‘City parking in Europe project’ shows that parking policy can be a leverage instrument for a new mobility culture that is in the

hands of the cities themselves

Towards a new mobility culture

Towards smarter urban transport

– Parking is a trendsetter for the introduction of innovative technologies (e.g. SMS payment has been successfully introduced for parking in Antwerp, the public transport company followedwith a pilot project for SMS payment of tram tickets)– Dialectics of progress: SMS payment in Sofia was introduced one

year later than Antwerp but it has a larger market share and Sofia could skip the investment in P&D machines

The ‘City parking in Europe project’ shows that parking policy can be a leverage instrument for a new mobility culture that is in

the hands of the cities themselves

Page 21: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

21

Towards a new mobility culture

Towards accessible urban transport

– Parking policy is a key element for implementationtarget groups oriented = selective access of cities and

neighbourhoods

The ‘City parking in Europe project’ shows that parking policy can be a leverage instrument for a new mobility culture that is in

the hands of the cities themselves

Towards new mobility principles

Sustainable mobility requires targeted implementation of four policy principles

1. Making the best use of technology ( including investmentin technology in transport modes, information systems and in the

transportsystem itself)2. Regulation and pricing (means that the external costs oftransport should be reflected in the actual costs of travel)3 Land-use development, including planning and regulations (needs

to be integrated with mobility policy to support shorter travel distances)4 Clearly targeted personal information ( including socialpressure and awareness raising)Source : Banister, D., 2009.

Fundamental reflection is necessary regarding the dilemmas to obtain sustainable urban mobility

Page 22: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

22

Towards new mobility principles

Parking policy as a linking pin between transport modes but also between mobility and urban development

Parking policy is an essential part of sustainable mobility policy and can a leverage instrument for it

shopping

living

leisure

working

parking A

parking Bparking

&mobility

shopping

working

living leisure

parking C

parking D

FROM TO

car traffic

publictransport

biking

walking

parking

parking&

intermodality

car traffic

publictransport

walking biking

FROM T O

Towards new mobility principles

Integrated parking policy requires a area based balance regarding quantity and type of parking facilities

1. Balance for different uses/functions in the city and for the public domain (urban master planning and management)

2. Balance for different transport modes respecting the co-modality principle (mobility planning and management)

3.Demand –supply ratio for parking(=main issue for parking planning and management)

Parking policy is an essential part of sustainable mobility policy and can a leverage instrument for it

Page 23: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

23

Towards new mobility principles

Different approaches to find demand-supply balance are related to policy approach:

1.Demand following policy: surveys and /or fixed parking standards

---static deterministic balance2.Steering policy approach: differentiated parking standards related to public transport service and/or+

frozen number of parking places (e.g. stand still principle in FlandersRegion in

Belgium)---static voluntaristicbalance

3. Integrated policy--- dynamic balance

Parking policy is an essential part of sustainable mobility policy and can a leverage instrument for it

demand

activ

ityfig

ure

parking supp ly

garag

estr

eets

place

s

parkingbalance

Towards new mobility principles

Parking policy and social acceptance development

- Key success factor for urban parking policy is starting a mentality change -of a changing attitude towards mobility (‘a new mobility culture’)

- Desired changed attitude of the user is therefore more than avoid parking offenses

- Combination of control – enforcement and communication appears to be most effective

- Step by step (i.e. area by area) introduction of (new) parking policy appears to be successful in a lot of cities

Parking policy is an essential part of sustainable mobility policy and can a leverage instrument for it

Page 24: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

24

ConclusionsGood practice of parking policy in European cities shows that parking policy is the largest single management tool in modern urban mobility management that cities have in their own hands.

Cities can use parking policy as a leverage instrument to fostersustainable urban mobility development. Further development of the concept of urban sustainable mobility by research and practice will allow to clarify the adapted policy contents and instruments.

[email protected] 475 6565 20

Page 25: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

25

䅀䇐䅐䊀䇐䆀䈠䅐 䄐䊠䆰䄰䄀䈀䈐䆠䆀 䄰䈀䄀䅀䇠䄠䅐: 䇰䈀䇠䈐䈠䈀䄀䇐䈐䈠䄠䅐䇐䆀 䈠䈀䄀䇐䈐䉀䇠䈀䇀䄀䉠䆀䆀 䆀 䇰䈀䅐䅀䆀䅰䄠䆀䆠䄀䈠䅐䆰䈐䈠䄠䄀 䇐䄀

䇀䇠䄐䆀䆰䇐䇠䈐䈠䈠䄀䅐.䅀䎀䏀䎀䐠䐀䏠䌠䌀1

䄠䒠䌠䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀䍐䈐䒠䌰䎰䌀䐐䏐䏠 䇐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䈀

䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 2007-2013 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀 䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏐䏠 䏠䌐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䎀䐠䍐, 䏐䌀䐐䏠䑰䍐䏐䎀 䎠䒠䏀 䍰䌀䐐䎀䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䐀䌀䍰䑠䌠䍐䐠 䎀 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀; 䏰䏠䍀䎠䐀䍐䏰䌀 䍰䌀 䐀䌀䌠䏐䏠䏰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀, 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏰䐀䎀䏠䌐䒐䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䏐䏠䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀; 䍰䌀䒐䎀䐠䌀 䎀 䏰䏠䍀䏠䌐䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀; 䏰䏠䍀䏠䌐䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䑰䐀䍐䍰 䎀䍰䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐 䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐. 䇠䐠䑰䍐䐠䍐䏐䏠 䍐, 䑰䍐 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䌠䒠䌠 䎀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䌰䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀 (䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䏰䏠䍀䏰䏠䏀䏠䌰䏐䌀䐠 䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䌀 䍀䏠 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䐰䍀䌀 䎀 䍀䌀 䍰䌀䐐䎀䎰䓰䐠 䍀䎀䏐䌀䏀䎀䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䎀 䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䏐䎀䓰 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠); 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠; 䐀䍐䌰䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀; 䏠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐.

䇀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍐 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䌀 䏠䐠䎰䎀䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䌀. 䈠䓰 䎀䏀䌀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䏐䎀 䎀䍰䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐䎀䓰 - 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀, 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀, 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䍐䎠䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䎀, 䎀 䍐 䍠䎀䍰䏐䍐䏐䏠䌠䌀䍠䍐䏐 䑀䌀䎠䐠䏠䐀 䍰䌀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 - 䑰䐀䍐䍰 䐰䏰䐀䌀䍠䏐䓰䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰䐠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀 䏐䌀䐠䎀䐐䎠, 䏐䏠 䎀 䑰䐀䍐䍰 䐐䒠䍰䍀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䍰䌀 䏰䏠-䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䏠 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠䌀. 䆀䏀䌀 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀䏐䎀䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀, 䑰䍐 䐰䐐䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䐐 䏠䌐䒐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 䌠 䐐䒠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐, 䌠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䎀䏀䌀 䎀 䐐䌠䏠䎀䐠䍐 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䑀䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏠䐐䏠䌐䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䌀. 䄠 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䏐 䏰䎰䌀䏐 䐠䐀䎀 䌀䐐䏰䍐䎠䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䎠䎀 䍰䌀 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀䏐䎀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䎀䓰: (1) 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䎀䐐䐠䎀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀; (2) 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䏠䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䏐䎀 䎀䍰䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀; (3) 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䐐䏰䐀䓰䏀䏠 䑠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠䐠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐.

䄰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䎀 䌠 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䅀䏐䍐䐐 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏠 76% 䏠䐠 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䈀 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䍠䎀䌠䍐䍐 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 – 䌠 䐐䐠䏠䎰䎀䑠䌀䐠䌀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 䐐 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀䍀 1 䏀䎀䎰䎀䏠䏐 䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀; 6 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀 䐐 䏰䏠 䏐䌀䍀 100 000 䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 (䇰䎰䏠䌠䍀䎀䌠, 䄠䌀䐀䏐䌀, 䄐䐰䐀䌰䌀䐐, 䈀䐰䐐䍐, 䇰䎰䍐䌠䍐䏐, 䈐䐠䌀䐀䌀 䅰䌀䌰䏠䐀䌀); 27 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀 䐐 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏠䐠 30 䑐䎀䎰䓰䍀䎀 䍀䏠 100 䑐䎀䎰䓰䍀䎀 䍀䐰䒀䎀 䎀 174 䏀䌀䎰䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀 䐐 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏠䐠 10 䑐䎀䎰䓰䍀䎀 䍀䏠 30 䑐䎀䎰䓰䍀䎀 䍀䐰䒀䎀 (䑀䎀䌰.1). 䄠 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䎀䍀䍐䏐䐠䎀䑀䎀䑠䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 36 䌀䌰䎰䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀 䌀䐀䍐䌀䎰䌀 (䎠䏠䏐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀

1 䅀䏠䑠. 䍀-䐀 䌀䐀䑐. 䅐䎰䍐䏐䌀 䅀䎀䏀䎀䐠䐀䏠䌠䌀, 䎠䌀䐠䍐䍀䐀䌀 “䄰䐀䌀䍀䏠䐰䐐䐠䐀䏠䎐䐐䐠䌠䏠”, 䄀䐀䑐䎀䐠䍐䎠䐠䐰䐀䍐䏐 䑀䌀䎠䐰䎰䐠䍐䐠 䏰䐀䎀 䈰䏐䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀 䏰䏠 䌀䐀䑐䎀䐠䍐䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀, 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠 䎀 䌰䍐䏠䍀䍐䍰䎀䓰, 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰, 䍰䌀 䎠䏠䏐䐠䌀䎠䐠: [email protected]

Page 26: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

26

䏠䎠䏠䎰䏠 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䎀䎰䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐) 䐐 䏠䌐䒐䌀 䏰䎰䏠䒐 47 457.3 䎠䌠. 䎠䏀 (43.29% 䏠䐠 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀) 䎀 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏠5.8 䏀䎀䎰䎀䏠䏐䌀 䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 (75.91% 䏠䐠 䏠䌐䒐䎀䓰 䌐䐀䏠䎐 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠).

䉀䎀䌰. 1. 䈀䌀䍰䏰䏠䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䈀 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 (䎀䍰䐠䏠䑰䏐䎀䎠: 䇐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀 䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀 䍰䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠

䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 2007-2013)

䅀䍐䏀䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠 䏠䌐䒐䏠 䏐䌀䏀䌀䎰䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 - 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䏠 䍰䌀䐐䐠䌀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎀 䏰䏠-䌐䒠䐀䍰䏠 䏐䌀䏀䌀䎰䓰䌠䌀䒐 䌐䐀䏠䎐 䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䌠 䏀䌀䎰䎠䎀䐠䍐 䐐䍐䎰䎀䒐䌀 䎀 䐰䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐䏠 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䐐䌀䏀䏠 䌠 䏐䌀䎐-䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 (䐠䌀䌐䎰. 1).

䈠䌀䌐䎰䎀䑠䌀. 1. 䅀䆀䇐䄀䇀䆀䆠䄀 䇐䄀 䇐䄀䈐䅐䆰䅐䇐䆀䅐䈠䇠 䄠 䈀 䄐䊠䆰䄰䄀䈀䆀䋰 䄠 䇰䅐䈀䆀䇠䅀䄀 2001-2005 (䎀䍰䐠䏠䑰䏐䎀䎠: 䇐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀 䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀 䍰䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 2007-2013)

䈰䐐䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䐐 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠-䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䎀 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䐰䐐䎰䏠䌠䎀䓰 䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀䐠 䏰䐀䎀䑰䎀䏐䌀 䍰䌀 䏀䌀䒐䌀䌐䏐䏠 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏠䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠, 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䏠 䐐 䏠䐠䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䏐䎀 䎀 䌠䒠䍰䏐䎀䎠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䌠䎀 䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀. 䈠䌀䎠䌀, 䌠䒠䏰䐀䍐䎠䎀 䏠䌐䒐䏠 䏐䌀䏀䌀䎰䓰䌠䌀䒐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐, 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䐐䍐 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䐠 䍰䌀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䐐 䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐

Page 27: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

27

䏐䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠. 䈰䐐䌠䏠䓰䌠䌀䐠 䐐䍐 䎠䐀䌀䎐䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䍐䐀䍐䏐䎀 䍰䌀 䏐䏠䌠䎀 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䌀, 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䎀 䌐䎀䍰䏐䍐䐐 䏰䎰䏠䒐䎀, 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀

䇠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䌀 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䎀䐐䐠䎀䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䏀䏐䏠䍰䎀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䍀䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 20 䌠䍐䎠 䍐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䌀䎠䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐀䌀䍀䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠-䎠䐀䒠䌰䏠䌠䌀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䐐 䎀䍰䓰䌠䍐䏐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀, 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䎀䎰 䏰䐀䎀䐠䍐䌰䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䎀 䐐䎀䎰䌀 䍰䌀 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰. 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䍐 䏠䐠䎰䎀䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䍀䎀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䓰 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀, 䑰䎀䓰䐠䏠 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䌠䎰䍐䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䐐䍐 䎠䏠䐀䍐䏐䎀 䌠 䌐䎰䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐰䐐䎰䐰䌰䎀 䎀 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䌠 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀, 䏰䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䎀 䐐䏀䍐䐐䍐䏐䌀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀 䐰䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䌀 䏐䌀 䍰䍐䏀䓰䐠䌀 䎀 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏀䐀䍐䍠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠 – 䏠䐠 䐀䌀䍀䎀䌀䎰䏐䌀 (䏐䌀䐐䎰䍐䍀䍐䏐䌀 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䍐䍀-䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀) 䍀䏠 䐀䌀䍀䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠-䎠䐀䒠䌰䏠䌠䌀 (䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䌠䐠䏠䐀䌀䐠䌀 䏰䏠䎰䏠䌠䎀䏐䌀 䏐䌀 20䐠䎀 䌠䍐䎠).

䇰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 (1945-1989) 䍐 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䍀䎀䎠䌀䎰䏐䌀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏐䌀䏀䍐䐐䌀, 䏠䐐䏠䌐䍐䏐䏠 䌠 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐, 䏠䐠䎠䎰䎀䎠䌠䌀䒐䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䐰䍠䍀䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䌐䐰䐀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏐䍀䐰䐐䐠䐀䎀䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀, 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䏐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐 䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䏐䑠䎀䏰䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䇀䏠䍀䍐䐀䏐䎀䍰䏀䌀. 䋰䐐䏐䏠 䌠䎀䍀䎀䏀䎀 䐐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎠䒠䏀 䏐䍐䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䏐䏠 䎀 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䌠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䏠䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 1939-1985 䌰䏠䍀䎀䏐䌀 (䑀䎀䌰.2).

䈀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䌐䍐䎰䍐䍠䎀 䏰䏠䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐䏐䏠 䏰䐀䍐䏀䎀䏐䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏠䐠 䑠䓰䎰䏠䐐䐠䏐䏠 䏰䏠䍀䏀䍐䏐䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䐰䌠䌀䒐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䐠䒠䎠䌀䏐 䌠 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䎠䒠䏀 䑀䏠䎠䐰䐐 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏠䌐䏠䌰䌀䐠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䏰䏠䓰䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䌠䎀 䎀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䐰䌠䌀䒐䎀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䎀 䐐 䌀䎠䑠䍐䏐䐠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䏠䐠䏠 䎀䏀 䏠䌐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䎠䒠䏀 䏰䐀䍐䏠䐠䎠䐀䎀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䐐䐠䏠䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀䐐䎰䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠 䍰䌀 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䍀䍐䏐䐠䎀䑰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐. 䄠 䎠䐀䌀䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 (䏰䐀䍐䍰 1980䐠䍐) 䐐䌀 䏰䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䏐䌀䐠䎀 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䐰䐐䏰䍐䑐䎀 䌠 䌀䍀䌀䏰䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䍐 䏠䒐䍐 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑰䌀䐐䐠䎀 䎠䒠䏀 䐀䎀䐠䒠䏀䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䎀䓰 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠, 䐀䍐䌀䌐䎀䎰䎀䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐰䎰䎀䑰䏐䏠-䎠䌠䌀䐀䐠䌀䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀, 䌠 䐠䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䑰䏠䌠䍐䒀䎠䎀䓰 䏀䌀䒐䌀䌐 䎀 䏠䌐䏠䐐䏠䌐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌀䐠䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀 䏰䍐䒀䍐䑐䏠䍀䏐䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐..

Page 28: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

28

1939 1954

1965 1985

1939 1954

1965 1985

䉀䎀䌰.2. 䉐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 1939-1985 (䌀䍀䌀䏰䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠,䄰䍐䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䎀 䌀䐠䎰䌀䐐 䏐䌀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 䎀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䎐䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䌀䌰䎰䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰, 1993)

䆀 䍀䏠 䍀䏐䍐䐐 䌠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䐐䌀 䌠䎀䍀䎀䏀䎀 䎀 䏐䍐䏰䐀䍐䏠䍀䏠䎰䍐䏐䎀 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䏠䐠 䏐䍐䌰䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䎀䐐䐠䎀䎠䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀: (䌀) 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䏰䏠 䐀䌀䍰䏀䍐䐀䎀 䎀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䎀䐠䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏰䌀䏐䍐䎰䏐䎀 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䏐䎀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䎀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰 (䐐 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䑐䏐䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰 䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠 䎀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䍐 䏰䏠-䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀 䐐䌰䐀䌀䍀䎀 , 䐠.䍐. 䏰䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䍐 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䎀䐠䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䌠䐐䍐 䏰䏠-䏐䌀䌠䒠䏐 䏠䐠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀); (䌐) 䏐䍐䏐䏠䐀䏀䌀䎰䏐䏠 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䏰䏠 䐀䌀䍰䏀䍐䐀䎀 (䍀䏐䍐䐐 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀) 䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䒀䎰䍐䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌠 䌐䎰䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠 䍀䏠 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀; (䌠) 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀/ 䏐䍐䍀䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰 䏐䌀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䎀 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䒐䎀 䏰䎰䏠䒐䎀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀; (䌰) 䐐䎰䌀䌐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䌀 䎀 䏐䍐䍀䏠䌐䐀䍐 䏰䏠䍀䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䏐䌀 䐠䍐䑐䏐䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䏐䍐 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䎀䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀䐠䌀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀.

䇠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠-䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎀 䌠 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䍀䍐䐐䍐䐠䎀䎰䍐䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 20 䌠䍐䎠 䐐䌀 䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌀䏐䎀 䏠䐠 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䎀 䍀䍐䏀䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䌀 䎠䐀䎀䍰䌀, 䏐䏠 䎀 䏠䐠 䍀䒠䎰䌐䏠䎠䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀 䎀 䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䏐䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䎀, 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䓰䐠 䐐䍐 䑠䍐䏐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐, 䏐䌀䑰䎀䏐䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠 䎀 䏐䌀䑰䎀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䍀䌠䎀䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 (䐠䌀䌐䎰. 2), 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䎠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍀䌠䍐 䍀䍐䐐䍐䐠䎀䎰䍐䐠䎀䓰 䏰䐀䏠䐠䎀䑰䌀䐠 䍀䌠䍐 䐰䐐䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀 䎀 䍀䒠䎰䌐䏠䎠䎀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䏐䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䎀: (䌀) 䏠䐠 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䌀 䎠䒠䏀 䍀䍐䏀䏠䎠䐀䌀䐠䎀䑰䏐䌀 䎀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䏠-䏠䐀䎀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀; (䌐) 䏠䐠 䍰䌀䐠䌠䏠䐀䍐䏐䌀 䎠䒠䏀 䏠䐠䌠䏠䐀䍐䏐䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䎰䏠䌐䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀.

䈠䌀䌐䎰䎀䑠䌀 1: 䈠䅐䇐䅀䅐䇐䉠䆀䆀 䄠 䄰䈀䄀䅀䈐䆠䇠䈠䇠 䈀䄀䅰䄠䆀䈠䆀䅐 䄠 䇰䇠䈐䈠-

Page 29: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

29

䈐䇠䉠䆀䄀䆰䆀䈐䈠䆀䉰䅐䈐䆠䆀䋰 䇰䅐䈀䆀䇠䅀䈐䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀 䇰䏠䍰䎀䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀 䐠䍐䏐䍀䍐䏐䑠䎀䎀 䇐䍐䌰䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀 䐠䍐䏐䍀䍐䏐䑠䎀䎀

䄰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐-䏐䎀䍐

䌠䒠䍰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䏠䌐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠 䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䍰䍐䏀䓰䐠䌀;䍀䍐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䌠䎰䌀䐐䐠䐠䌀;䍰䌀䐐䎀䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠;䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䒐䌀 䐀䏠䎰䓰 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䎀 䏐䍐䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䐐䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀;

䏠䐠䐠䍐䌰䎰䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䐐䐠䎀䐠䐰䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀 䎠䏠䏠䐀䍀䎀䏐䌀䑠䎀䓰, 䏐䌀䏀䌀䎰䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䏠䌐䎰䌀䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䌠 䏰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䌠䌀䐠䌀 䎀 䏐䏠䐀䏀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀 䌐䌀䍰䌀

䄰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀

䐀䌀䍰䑰䐰䏰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䏐䏠䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䏀䏠䍀䍐䎰 䎀 䍀䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䑀䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䏐䏠䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀;䐐䒠䍠䎀䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䎀 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀 䎠䌠䌀䐀䐠䌀䎰䎀;䏰䏠䍀䏠䌐䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐠䌀䏐䍀䌀䐀䐠䎀.

䑐䌀䏠䐠䎀䑰䏐䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐;䐀䌀䍰䐐䐠䎀䎰䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐;䏠䌐䍐䍰䎰䓠䍀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐, 䏰䏠䓰䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䒀䎰䍐䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀, 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠;

䇰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐

䍰䌀䐐䎀䎰䌠䌀䒐䏠 䐐䍐 䌠䏐䎀䏀䌀䏐䎀䍐 䎠䒠䏀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐;䏐䌀䌠䎰䎀䍰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䏠䏰䎀䐠.

䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䏰䎀䐠 䌠 䏠䌐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䏰䎀䐠 䌠 䎠䏠䏠䐀䍀䎀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䐐 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䏠 䑀䎀䏐䌀䏐䐐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐.

䄰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䏐䌀䑰䎀䏐 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠

䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䍀䎀䌠䎀䍀䐰䌀䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐠䌀䏐䍀䌀䐀䐠䎀 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠 䏐䌀 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀 䌰䐀䐰䏰䎀;䐀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䎀䍰䌐䏠䐀;䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䍀䍐䎰䌀 䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䏠䌐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䌀䐠䌀;䐀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏐䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䎀䍰䌐䏠䐀;䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠.

䏰䏠䏐䎀䍠䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䎀䓰 䐐䐠䌀䏐䍀䌀䐀䐠 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠 䌠 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䎀;䍰䌀䌰䐰䌐䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䐠䎠䐀䎀䐠䎀 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䌀;䏰䏠䏐䎀䍠䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐;䏰䐀䎀䌠䌀䐠䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䐐䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀;䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䍀䐀䒠䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䒀䐰䏀䏠䌠䏠 䍰䌀䏀䒠䐀䐐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐;䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䎀䑀䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䓰 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䌀 䐐䍐䌰䐀䍐䌰䌀䑠䎀䓰;

Page 30: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

30

䈐䐀䍐䍀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏠䐐䏠䌐䍐䏐䏠 䌠䌀䍠䏐䎀 䐐 䏠䌰䎰䍐䍀 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䎠䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䐠 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䌀:

Ø 䅰䌀䌠䐀䒠䒐䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䎠䒠䏀 ‘䏰䐀䍐䍀-䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰’ 䏀䐰 䌠䎀䍀 - 䐀䌀䍰䏰䏠䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䑀䎀䐐䎀, 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䏠䌐䍐䎠䐠䎀, 䑐䏠䐠䍐䎰䎀 䎀 䐠.䏐., 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䐐䌀 䌠䐐䍐 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䏐䌀䐐䏠䑰䍐䏐䎀 䎠䒠䏀 䐠䐰䐀䎀䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐, 䌀 䏐䍐 䎠䒠䏀 䏐䐰䍠䍀䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀;

Ø 䇰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䌀䌠䌀䒐䌀䐠䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 – 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏰䏠䎠䐀䌀䎐 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌀䐀䐠䍐䐀䎀䎀; 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䑀䎀䐐 䎀 䌐䌀䏐䎠䏠䌠䎀 䐐䌰䐀䌀䍀䎀 䎀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䎀, 䏐䏠 䐐䒠䒐䏠 䎀 䏐䏠䌠䎀 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䏐䎀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䎀 (䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䌀䐀䓰䒐䎀 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䏐䎀 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䍰䌀䌠䎀䒀䍐䏐䎀 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䎠䒠䏀 䐐䐠䌀䏐䍀䌀䐀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠 䎀 䎠䒠䏀 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀䓰 䏰䐀䏠䍀䐰䎠䐠);

Ø 䈀䍐䌠䎀䐠䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑰䌀䐐䐠䎀 – 䏐䍐䐀䌀䌠䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐, 䏐䏠 䏠䐐䍐䍰䌀䍐䏀䏠 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䌀䐀䓰䒐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䒠䏠䌐䐀䌀䍠䍐䏐䎀䓰; 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐 䍐 䏐䌀䎐-䌠䍐䑰䍐 䐐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䎀 䐐 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䌐䒠䐀䍰䏠 䎀 䐰䍀䏠䌐䏐䏠 䏰䐀䎀䍀䌠䎀䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎠䒠䏀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀;

䅀䍐-䎀䏐䍀䐰䐐䐠䐀䎀䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䏰䏠䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀 ‘䌠䒠䐠䐀䍐䒀䏐䎀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䎀’ 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䐠䒠䎠䌀䏐; 䏐䌀䌐䎰䓠䍀䌀䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䒐䏠䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䌐䒠䐀䍰䏠 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䅠䇰 䌀䐀䍐䌀䎰䎀䐠䍐 (䍰䌀䍐䏀䌀䒐䎀 䏠䌐䒀䎀䐀䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌠 䌐䎰䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠 䍀䏠 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀).

䇰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䅰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌐䐀䏠䓰 䏐䌀 䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䍐 䐠䐀䌀䎐䏐䌀

䐠䍐䏐䍀䍐䏐䑠䎀䓰 䌠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 (䑀䎀䌰.3). 䄐䐀䏠䓰䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䐠䍐䍠䌀䌠䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䎀 䐠䍐䏀䏰䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏀䐰 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 2006-2008 䐐䌀 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䏐䏠 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䌠 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀 䍀䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䌀䐠 䌠䏐䐰䒀䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䐐䐠䏠䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䌠 䐐䐠䏠䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀. – 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐. 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䏠䐠䐀䌀䍰䓰䌠䌀䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䐐䐠䌀䏐䍀䌀䐀䐠 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䒐䎀䐠䍐 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䍐䏐 䎀䍰䌐䏠䐀 䌠 䏐䌀䑰䎀䏐䌀 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠 䎀 䏰䐀䎀䍀䌠䎀䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐. 䇰䏠䌠䎀䒀䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 (䏰䐀䎀 䌐䐰䐀䏐䏠 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䒐 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䍀䎀䌠䎀䍀䐰䌀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䏀䏠䐠䏠䐀䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠) 䍐 䐐䐀䍐䍀 䌠䌀䍠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀 䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䏠䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䏠䐠䎰䎀䎠䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䐐䐠-䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐, 䏐䏠 䐠䏠 䎀䍰䏰䐀䌀䌠䓰 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䓰䌠䌀䒐䎀, 䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䎀 䍐䎠䐐䏰䍐䐀䐠䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀 䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀䎀䑠䌀 䏠䐠 䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏠䏠䌐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䌀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䍐䍠䍐䍀䏐䍐䌠䎀䍐.

Page 31: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

31

䉀䎀䌰.3. 䈠䍐䏀䏰䏠䌠䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌐䐀䏠䓰 䏐䌀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䈀 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䏰䏠 䏠䌐䎰䌀䐐䐠䎀 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 2006-2008 (䏰䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䏠䐠 䇐䈐䆀)

䈰䐐䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐠䎀䑰䌀䒐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 䌠 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀䌀 䎀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀 䑰䍐䐐䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䏠䎠䌀䍰䌠䌀䐠 䏰䌀䐀䌀䍀䏠䎠䐐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䌠䌀䒐䎀 䐐䍐 䍐䍀䎀䏐 䍀䐀䐰䌰 䏰䐀䎀 䑀䏠䐀䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䐰䍀䏐䎀 䍰䌀 䐀䍐䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䍀䎀䎰䍐䏀䎀. 䇐䍐䍰䌀䍀䏠䌠䏠䎰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䍀䒠䑐䌠䌀䒐䎀䓰 䐐䍐 䏀䌀䐐䏠䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠 䍐 䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䑰䎀䏐䌀 䍰䌀 䒀䎀䐀䏠䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䏰䐀䎀 䍐䍠䍐䍀䏐䍐䌠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䐀䐰䍀䏠䌠䎀 䏰䒠䐠䐰䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑀䎀䓰䏐䑠䎀 (䐐䏐.1), 䏐䏠 䌠䏠䍀䎀 䍀䏠 䏠䐠䏐䍐䏀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䌀 䏠䐠 䏰䍐䒀䍐䑐䏠䍀䑠䎀䐠䍐 (䐐䏐.2) 䎀 䏰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䓰 䏰䏠䍀 䌠䒠䏰䐀䏠䐐 䐐䏰䏠䐐䏠䌐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䎀 䍀䌀 䏠䏰䌀䍰䎀䏀 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䌠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䏠䐠䍀䎀䑐 䎀 䎠䏠䏐䐠䌀䎠䐠 (䐐䏐.3). 䌀 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䎀䍠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䌀 䌠 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䎀 䏐䍐 䐐䌀䏀䏠 䐐䍐 䏠䎠䌀䍰䌠䌀䐠 䏐䍐䐰䍀䏠䌐䏐䎀 䎀 䍰䌀 䏰䍐䒀䍐䑐䏠䍀䍐䑠䌀, 䎀 䍰䌀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䌀, 䏐䏠 䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀䐠 䑰䌀䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䍐䍠䍐䍀䏐䍐䌠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䎀, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀䏀䍐 䍰䌀 䏐䍐䎀䍰䌐䍐䍠䏐䌀 䎀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀䏀䍐 䍀䌀 䍰䌀䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌠䌀䏀䍐. 䄠 䏐䍐䏰䐀䍐䐐䍐䎠䌠䌀䒐䎀䐠䍐 䌀䌰䐀䍐䐐䎀䌠䏐䎀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䐀䍐䎠䎰䌀䏀䎀 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䍐 䏰䏠-䏀䏠䒐䏐䎀 䏐䏠䌠䎀 䏀䏠䍀䍐䎰䎀 䌠 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䌠 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 䏀䏠䍠䍐䏀 䍀䌀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䎀䏀 䏐䌀䐠䎀䐐䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䑀䏠䐀䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䑠䍐䏐䏐䏠䐐䐠䏐䌀 䐐䎠䌀䎰䌀, 䌠 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䏰䐀䎀䐠䍐䍠䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䎰䎀䑰䍐䏐 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰 䍐 䌠䌀䍠䍐䏐 䍰䏐䌀䎠 䍰䌀 䍠䎀䐠䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䐰䐐䏰䍐䑐 䎀 䌰䌀䐀䌀䏐䑠䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䎀䍠 (䈐䏐.4).

Page 32: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

32

䈐䏐. 1. 䄀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䍐䏐 䏰䏠䐠䏠䎠, 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰, 䌐䐰䎰. 䉠䌀䐀 䇠䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䎀䐠䍐䎰, 䑰䌀䐐-䏰䎀䎠

䈐䏐. 2 䅀䏠䌐䐀䎀䑰, 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䏰䍐䒀䍐䑐䏠䍀䏐䌀 䍰䏠䏐䌀, 䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䑰䍐䏐 䍀䍐䏐, 2004

䈐䏐.3. 䇐䍐䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀 - 䅠䆠

“䇀䎰䌀䍀䏠䐐䐠”

䈐䏐. 4. . 䄀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䒠䐠 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䑠䍐䏐䏐䏠䐐䐠 - 䐀䍐䎠䎰䌀䏀䌀, 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰, 䏰䎰䏠䒐䌀䍀 䈐䌠. 䇐䍐䍀䍐䎰䓰

䇐䌀䌠䎰䎀䍰䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䌀 䌠 䍐䍠䍐䍀䏐䍐䌠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䍠䎀䌠䏠䐠 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀 䐐䒠䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䍐䒀䍐䑐䏠䍀䑠䎀 䎀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 (䐐䏐. 5), 䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠 䏐䌀 䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏠䏠䐠䏐䏠䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀 (䐐䏐.6), 䏐䏠 䎀 䎀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䌠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䌀 䐰 䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䎀, 䍐䎠䐐䏰䍐䐀䐠䎀, 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䓰䌠䌀䒐䎀 (䐐䏐.7 䎀 8).

䇠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎀 䎀䏀䌀䐠 䌠䎀䍀䎀䏀 䏠䐠䏰䍐䑰䌀䐠䒠䎠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䌀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐠䎀䑰䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠䐠䏠䑠䎀, 䏐䏠 䐠䍐 䏐䌀䏀䎀䐀䌀䐠 䐐䌠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䏐䏠 䏠䐠䐀䌀䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐 䎀 䌠䒠䌠 䑀䎀䎰䏠䐐䏠䑀䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䍀䐰䐀䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐. 䄠 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 ‘䏰䐀䍐䑐䏠䍀䌀’ 䏰䐀䍐䍰 1990-䐠䍐䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀䏀䌀 䏐䎀䐐䒠䎠 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䏰䐀䎀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐠 (䌠 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䌀 䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐 䎀 䐐 䏐䌀䐠䐀䐰䏰䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䍐䌰䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑀䍐䐐䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䏐䌀䌰䎰䌀䐐䎀 䐐䏰䐀䓰䏀䏠 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐), 䏐䌀䌐䎰䓠䍀䌀䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀

Page 33: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

33

䈐䏐5. 䄀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䎀 䑐䏠䐀䌀 -䐐䏰䏠䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠, 䇐䍐䐐䍐䌐䒠䐀,

2007

䈐䏐. 6. 䄀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䎀 䑐䏠䐀䌀 - 䐐䏰䏠䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠, 䌐䐰䎰 䈀䐰䐐䎠䎀, 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰

䈐䏐. 7. 䄀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䎀 䑐䏠䐀䌀 –䐐䒠䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䌀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠

䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠

䈐䏐. 8. 䄀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䎀 䑐䏠䐀䌀 - 䑰䎀䍐 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠?

䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䌠䎀䍰䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䎀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠 – 䏐䏠 䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䏐䌀䌰䎰䌀䐐䌀 䎀 䏀䏠䐠䎀䌠䌀䑠䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䏰䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎐; 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀䐠 䐐䍐 䑐䌀䏠䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䓰 䎀 䏐䍐䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䍐䏐 䎠䏠䏐䐠䐀䏠䎰 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䎀䏐䌠䍐䐐䐠䎀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䓰 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐; 䏐䌀䏰䐀䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䌀 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀 䏠䏰䎀䐠䎀 䍰䌀 䌀䎠䐠䐰䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䐀䌀䎰䏐䏠 䏠䐐䐠䌀䐀䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䏠䌠䌀 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐. 䈐䐀䍐䍀䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 1990-䐠䍐 䌰䏠䍀䎀䏐䎀 䌐䍐䎰䍐䍠䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䒠䐀䌠䎀 䐐䐠䒠䏰䎠䎀 䎠䒠䏀 䐀䍐䑀䏠䐀䏀䎀 䌠 䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䎀䍰䏀䍐䏐䍐䏐䎀䓰 䌠 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䌠䌀䐠䌀 䌐䌀䍰䌀; 䏐䌀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䐐䎠䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠 䍰䌀 䏰䒠䐀䌠䎀 䏰䒠䐠 䐐䎰䍐䍀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䓰䌠䓰䌠䌀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䍐䐐 䎠䒠䏀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐. 䆀䍰䐀䌀䍰 䏐䌀 䐠䌀䍰䎀 䐠䍐䏐䍀䍐䏐䑠䎀䓰 䍐 䏠䌐䓰䌠䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠 䎠䏠䏐䎠䐰䐀䐐 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䏀䌀 “䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 䎀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䌰䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰”, 䌠 䑰䎀䍐䐠䏠 䍰䌀䍀䌀䏐䎀䍐 䏰䐀䎀䐐䒠䐐䐠䌠䌀䐠 䎀 䐐䒠䏠䌐䐀䌀䍠䍐䏐䎀䓰, 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䐐 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀.

Page 34: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

34

䇰䏠䎰䏠䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䌀 䎠䒠䏀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠 䏀䎀䐐䎰䍐䏐䍐 䌠 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䒐䏠䐠䏠 䍀䍐䐐䍐䐠䎀䎰䍐䐠䎀䍐䐠䏠 (䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䇠䈰䇰 䏐䌀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 䎀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䎐䐐䎠䌀 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䌀) 䍐 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䏠 䐐 䑠䓰䎰䏠䐐䐠䏐䎀䓰 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠-䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䎠䏠䏐䐠䍐䎠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐰䐐䎀䎰䎀䓰 䌠 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏰䐀䎀䐐䒠䍐䍀䎀䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐 䎀 䐐 䏐䌀䌠䎰䎀䍰䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䎀 䎀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䐐䎠䎀 䏠䏰䎀䐠.

䈐䒠䒐䍐䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䏠 䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䎀䍰䏐䌀䍐, 䑰䍐 䌠䒠䏰䐀䍐䎠䎀 䏠䐠䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌀䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀䏰䐀䍐䍀䒠䎠, 䍀䏐䍐䐐 䌠䐐䍐 䏠䒐䍐 䌠 䏰䏠䎰䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䎀 䏰䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䎠䌀 䒀䎀䐀䏠䎠䏠 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䐠 䐠䍐䑐䏐䏠䎠䐀䌀䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀. 䇰䐀䌀䌠䓰䐠 䐐䍐 䏠䏰䎀䐠䎀 䍰䌀 䏀䍐䑐䌀䏐䎀䑰䏐䏠 䏰䐀䍐䏐䌀䐐䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䐐䑐䍐䏀䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䍀䐰䐀䎀 䌐䍐䍰 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䑀䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䍐䏐 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䍐䏐 䎀 䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䍐䏐 䎠䏠䏐䐠䍐䎠䐐䐠; 䏐䍐 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀 䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏠䐠 䍰䌀䍀䒠䎰䌐䏠䑰䍐䏐䎀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䎀 䏐䍐 䐐䍐 䏠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䐠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䍰䌀 䐠䓰䑐; 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍰䐀䌀䑰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐; 䏐䍐䍀䏠䎠䌀䍰䌀䏐䎀 (䏐䏠 䎀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䏠䐀䍐䏐䎀) 䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀䐠 䏰䏠䍀䏠䍰䐀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䎠䏠䐀䐰䏰䑠䎀䓰 䎀 䏐䍐䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏐䎀 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䓰, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏰䏠䍀䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䐠 䌀䐠䏀䏠䐐䑀䍐䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍰䌀 䎀䏐䌠䍐䐐䐠䎀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐䎀䓰; 䑀䌀䎠䐠 䍐 䎀 䏐䍐䍀䏠䌐䐀䏠䐠䏠 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䏠-䏠䐀䎀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏰䐀䎀 䌠䍰䎀䏀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰. 䇐䌀䍀䍐䍠䍀䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䓰䏐䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐䏀 䍀䌀 䏠䐠䎠䐀䎀䍐䏀 䌠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䌠䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀 䏰䏠 “䈰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䒠䏀” (䌐䌀䎠䌀䎰䌀䌠䒠䐀䐐䎠䌀 䎀 䏀䌀䌰䎀䐐䐠䒠䐀䐐䎠䌀 䏠䌐䐀䌀䍰䏠䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠-䎠䌠䌀䎰䎀䑀䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䌀 䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐) 䌠 䈰䄀䈐䄰, 䐰䐐䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䐐 䍀䏠䌐䌀䌠䓰䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䌠 䇐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎠䎰䌀䐐䎀䑀䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䍀䎰䒠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐; 䌠 䌰䎰䌀䐐䐰䌠䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎀 䌠 䅰䌀䎠䏠䏐䌀 䍰䌀 䆠䌀䏀䌀䐀䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌀䐀䑐䎀䐠䍐䎠䐠䎀䐠䍐, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠 䏐䌀䍰䐀䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎠䐀䒠䌰䌀 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䏠䑀䍐䐐䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䍐䐠䍐䏐䐠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䏐䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏠䐠 䑠䓰䎰䏠䐐䐠䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䓰䏐䌀 䌠 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀䐠䍐 䎠䒠䏀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐, 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐.

䄀 䐰䐠䐀䍐 䏐䌀䎠䒠䍀䍐?䅀䏐䍐䐐 䌠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䐐䌀 䏰䏠䌠䐐䍐䏀䍐䐐䐠䏐䏠 䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䐠䐀䐰䍀䏐䎀 䍰䌀

䏰䐀䍐䏠䍀䏠䎰䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀, 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䐐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀, 䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䌀. 䄠䒠䍰䏐䎀䎠䌠䌀 䌠䒠䏰䐀䏠䐐䒠䐠 䍀䏠 䎠䌀䎠䌠䌀 䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌠䌀䒐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䌠 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䍀䏐䍐䐐 䍐 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䏐䏠 䏰䐀䏠䓰䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䏠-䏠䌐䒐䎀 䐐䌠䍐䐠䏠䌠䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 䌠 䐐䒠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐, 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䎰䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀 䏰䏠䌰䐀䍐䒀䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䒀䏐䎀 䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䎀, 䏐䌀 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䌀䍀䍐䎠䌠䌀䐠䏐䎀 䑀䎀䏐䌀䏐䐐䏠䌠䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䍰䌀 䏠䐐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䎀䎰䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䌰䐀䍐䒀䏐䎀 䏐䌀䐐䏠䎠䎀 䌠 䎰䏠䎠䌀䎰䏐䌀 䎀 䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀.

䇠䌐䏀䍐䏐䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䌠 䐀䌀䏀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 PlanetCense (䇀䐀䍐䍠䌀 䏐䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䎀 䓠䌰䏠䎀䍰䐠䏠䑰䏐䌀 䅐䌠䐀䏠䏰䌀, www.planet-cense.net) 䍀䌀䌠䌀 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䎀䍰䌠䏠䍀䌀, 䑰䍐 䉠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䎀 䋠䌰䏠䎀䍰䐠䏠䑰䏐䌀 䅐䌠䐀䏠䏰䌀 (䉠䆀䅐)“䍀䍐䏀䏠䏐䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀 䏰䏠-䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䍐䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䎀䑰䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䌠 䐐䐀䌀䌠䏐䍐䏐䎀䍐 䐐䒠䐐 䐐䐠䌀䐀䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䎀-䑰䎰䍐䏐䎠䎀 䏐䌀 䈐䒠䓠䍰䌀, 䏰䏠䏐䍐 䒐䏠 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䏐䌀䐐䓰 䍀䏠 䏀䏠䐀䑀䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀”. 䇰䐀䏠䍐䎠䐠䒠䐠 RIMED(INTERREG III-CADSES) 䍀䏠䎠䎰䌀䍀䌠䌀 䍰䌀 䐠䐀䎀 䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏐䏠 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䌀 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀: 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䒐䏠 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠 䏐䍐䐀䌀䌠䍐䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠, 䌰䍐䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䌀 䎀 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䑀䐀䌀䌰䏀䍐䏐䐠䌀䑠䎀䓰, 䏐䍐䌐䌀䎰䌀䏐䐐䎀䐀䌀䏐 䌀䏐䌀䐀䑐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䏐 䐀䌀䐐䐠䍐䍠, 䌠䏠䍀䍐䒐 䍀䏠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䌀 䎠䏠䏐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀, 䐀䌀䍰䐀䐰䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀

Page 35: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

35

䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䐐䍐䌰䐀䍐䌰䌀䑠䎀䓰. 䄠䒠䏰䐀䍐䎠䎀 䑰䍐 䍐 䐐䌀䏀䏠 䑰䌀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䏠 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䏠 䌠 䐀䌀䏀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䋠䌰䏠䎀䍰䐠䏠䑰䏐䌀 䅐䌠䐀䏠䏰䌀, 䏠䒐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䍰 2003 䓰䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 / 䐀䌀䍰䐐䐠䎀䎰䌀䏐䍐 (urban sprawl) 䌠 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀 䐐䍐 䎠䏠䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䎠䐀䎀䍐䒐䏠 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䐀䎀䐐䎠䏠䌠䍐 – 䎠䌀䎠䐠䏠 䏰䏠䐀䌀䍀䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐠䎀䑰䌀䒐䎀䐠䍐 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀, 䐠䌀䎠䌀 䎀 䌠䒠䌠 䌠䐀䒠䍰䎠䌀 䐐 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䌠䍐䐐䐠䎀䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䑀䏠䏐䍀䏠䌠䍐 (Nuisl, 2003). 䇠䐠䏰䐀䌀䌠䓰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䏰䏠䐀䒠䎠䎀 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䍐䏠䍀䏠䎰䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䏀䏠䍀䍐䎰 䏰䐀䎀 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䍀䐰䑐 䏐䌀 䆀䅐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀䐠 䐠䐀䎀 䏰䐀䎀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀: (1) 䏰䏠䍀䎠䐀䍐䏰䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䍐䑐䌀䏐䎀䍰䏀䎀 䏰䐀䎀 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀䐠䌀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀; (2) 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䍀䍐䏐䐠䎀䑰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䎀 䍰䌀䐐䎀䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䍠䎀䍰䏐䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀䌀 䑰䐀䍐䍰 䐀䌀䍰䏰䏠䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䎀䍠䏐䎀 䐰䐐䎰䐰䌰䎀 䎀 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䏠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䐠 䍀䏠䏀䎀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䏐䏠䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䎀䑰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀; 䍀䏠䏰䐰䐐䎠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䎀, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䌐䎀 䌰䌀䐀䌀䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䎰䏠 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠 䎀 䏐䌀䏀䌀䎰䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䌠䍐䐐䐠䎀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀䐠䎀䐐䎠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀, (3) 䏰䏠䌠䐠䏠䐀䏐䏠 䐰䐐䌠䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐/ 䐐䒠䍠䎀䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䒀䎰䍐䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌐䎰䎀䍰䏠 䍀䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐 - 䏰䐀䍐䏀䌀䑐䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䏀䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠䑰䌠䍐䏐䎀 䐐䎰䏠䍐䌠䍐 䎀 䎀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䌀 䐠䍐䑐䏐䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀.

䇠䐐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠 䍰䌀 䑠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䇠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀 “䈀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 2007-2013” SWOT 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䒠䐐䐠䏠䓰䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀 䐐䎀䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䎀䐠䐰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䌠 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䏀䏠䏀䍐䏐䐠䌀: (䌀)䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䍀䍐䏀䏠䏐䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀䐠 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠 䎀 䏰䏠䐠䍐䏐䑠䎀䌀䎰 䍀䌀 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䌀䐠 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䍀䌠䎀䌰䌀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䌀䌐䎀䎰䍐䏐 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䐀䌀䐐䐠䍐䍠; (䌐)䐀䌀䍰䏰䏠䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀 䐐䌀 䐐䐀䌀䌠䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐀䌀䌠䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䏐䏠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀; (䌠) 䏐䌀䎰䎀䑠䍐 䍐 䐐䎀䎰䏐䏠 䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䍐䏐䏠 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䌠 䌀䌰䎰䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐. 䈐䐀䍐䍀 䐐䎰䌀䌐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䎀 䐐䌀 䎀䍰䐠䒠䎠䏐䌀䐠䎀 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍐䎠䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䎀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 – 䎰䏠䒀䏠 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䌠䒠䍰䍀䐰䑐䌀, 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀 䏐䎀䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀䐠䏠䌠䌀䐀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀䍀䐀䒠䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰, 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䒀䐰䏀䏠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䍰䌀䏀䒠䐀䐐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䏐䎀䐐䎠䏠 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䐐䐠䐀䏠䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀; 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀, 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䐐䐠䎀䎰䌀䏐䍐, 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䌰䍐䏐䍐䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌐䎀䐠䏠䌠䎀 䏠䐠䏰䌀䍀䒠䑠䎀 䎀 䏠䐠䏰䌀䍀䏐䎀 䌠䏠䍀䎀; 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䌠䎰䍐䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠, 䏠䐐䐠䌀䐀䓰䎰 䎀 䏐䍐䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠 䏰䏠 䏠䐠䏐䏠䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䏰䏠䍀䌠䎀䍠䏐䎀䓰 䎀 䏰䏠䍀䌠䎀䍠䏐䎀䓰 䐐䒠䐐䐠䌀䌠; 䏐䍐䍀䏠䐐䐠䌀䐠䒠䑰䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䐠䏐䓀䏠䐀䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䌠䏀䍐䐐䐠䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䍐䎠䐠䎀.

䈐 䏠䌰䎰䍐䍀 䏐䌀 䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䏐䍀䍐䏐䑠䎀䎀, 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䍐䐐 䏰䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌀䌠䎰䓰䌠䌀䐠 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䏠䌠䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀 䐐䐀䌀䌠䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀 䏠䐠 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䌠䍐䐠䌀, 䌠䒠䍰 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䏠䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠, 䑰䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䉠䆀䅐 䐐䌀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䑰䏐䏠 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䏰䏠 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䎀 䏰䏠 䍀䍐䎠䎰䌀䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䑠䍐䎰䎀 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䌠䎀䐠䍐 䐐䎀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐, 䏀䌀䎠䌀䐀 䎀 䍀䌀 䐐䌀 䏐䌀䎰䎀䑠䍐 䏠䐐䐠䌀䐠䒠䑠䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 (Bertaud, 2004). 䈀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏰䐀䎀䎰䎀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐, 䐐䐀䌀䌠䏐䍐䏐䎀 䏰䏠 䑰䍐䐠䎀䐀䎀 䎀䏐䍀䎀䎠䌀䐠䏠䐀䌀 (䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠, 䏰䐀䏠䑀䎀䎰 䏐䌀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀䐠䌀; 䏰䐀䏠䑀䎀䎰 䏐䌀 䑠䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䍰䍐䏀䓰䐠䌀; 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䒀䎰䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏠䐠 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰) 䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䓰䌠䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䎀䓰, 䎠䌀䎠䐠䏠 䎀

Page 36: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

36

䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䑀䎀䎠䎀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏐䍐 䐐䍐 䌠䎰䎀䓰䓰䐠 䏠䐠 䐠䎀䏰䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠. 䈐䎰䍐䍀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䍐 䏐䌀䌐䎰䓠䍀䌀䌠䌀 䏰䏠䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐䏐䏠 䏐䏠䐀䏀䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀䐠䍐 –䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀 䏐䌀䍐䏀䎀 䌠 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐, 䏰䏠-䏐䎀䐐䎠䎀 䏐䌀䍐䏀䎀 䌠 䏰䌀䏐䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䎀, 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䍀䍐䎰䌀 䏐䌀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏠䑀䎀䐐 䏰䎰䏠䒐䎀 䌠 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀䌀 䍰䌀 䐐䏀䍐䐠䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䎰䏠䒐䎀. 䄠 䐐䒠䒐䏠䐠䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䌠䏐䍐䍰䌀䏰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌐䐀䏠䓰 䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀 䏰䐀䎀䑰䎀䏐䌀 䍰䌀 䏠䌰䐀䏠䏀䏐䏠 䍰䌀䏀䒠䐀䐐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䍰䌀䍀䐀䒠䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰. 䄠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀䓰䐠 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䒀䎰䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䍐 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䏐䌀 䑰䍐䐀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䐐䐠-䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 (䆰䏠䏐䍀䏠䏐 – 4.7%, 䇰䌀䐀䎀䍠 – 5.2%, 䇰䐀䌀䌰䌀 – 13.4%, 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 - 27.1%, 䆰䓠䌐䎰䓰䏐䌀 – 27.4%). 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䍀䏠䎠䌀䍰䌠䌀 䎀 䐐䏰䍐䒀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䎠䏠䏐䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䒀䎰䍐䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 - 䍰䌀䌐䌀䌠䓰䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎐 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌠䌀 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏠䐠 䐠䎀䏰䌀 ‘leap frog’ (‘䏰䐀䍐䐐䎠䌀䑰䌀䏐䍐’ 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀), 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀 䐀䌀䍰䑐䏠䍀䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠 䎀 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䏐䏠 䎀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐.

䆀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍀䏐䍐䐐 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䉠䆀䅐 䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䓰䌠䌀, 䑰䍐 䏠䌐䒐䌀 䍐 䐠䍐䏐䍀䍐䏐䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䏀䎀䏐䌀䌠䌀 䏠䐠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䐰䐐䐠䐀䏠䎐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐 (master plans) 䎠䒠䏀 䌰䍐䏐䍐䐀䌀䎰䏐䎀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐 䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 (general development plans). 䇐䌀 䏰䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䎠䌀, 䏠䌐䌀䑰䍐, 䑰䍐䐐䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䌠䒠䍰䏰䐀䏠䎀䍰䌠䍐䍠䍀䌀䐠 䐐䐠䌀䐀䎀 䌰䐀䍐䒀䎠䎀, 䍰䌀䒐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䏠䌠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䎰䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䎀䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䐠 䎠䒠䏀 䏐䌀䐐䎰䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀䐠䍐, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏐䍐 䐐䍐 䍀䒠䎰䍠䌀䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䏠 䐠䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䍐, 䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀 䎀䍰䌠䒠䐀䒀䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠 ‘䏠䐠䐀䍐䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐’ 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䍐䏐䎀 (Musil, 2005). 䈀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌠 䏰䏠䐐䐠䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䄠䌀䐀䒀䌀䌠䌀 䍀䍐䏀䏠䏐䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䍰䌀 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐰䎰䍐䐐䏐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐. 䈠䌀䏀 䐐䌀 䍀䍐䑀䎀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䐠䐀䎀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀:(1) 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䏠 䏠䐀䎀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 (48% 䏠䐠 䏠䌐䒐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䎰䏠䒐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䌀䐠䌀), 䐐 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䎀 䏐䌀 䎀䏀䏠䐠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏐䌀䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䎀 䌰䒠䐐䐠䏠䐠䎀, 䎀 䍀䏠䏰䐰䐐䐠䎀䏀䎀 䌠䐐䓰䎠䌀䎠䌠䎀 䎠䏠䏀䌐䎀䏐䌀䑠䎀䎀 䏐䌀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䎀 䏰䐀䎀 䏐䌀䎰䎀䑰䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䏐䏠 䐠䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䍐; (2) 䍰䌀 䏐䍐䍰䍀䐀䌀䌠䏠䐐䎰䏠䌠䏐䎀/ 䌠䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 (14%); (3) 䍰䌀䒐䎀䐠䍐䏐䎀 (37%) –䎀䐐䐠䏠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀, 䐰䏐䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䐠䍐䐠䐐䎠䎀, 䍰䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀 䏰䎰䏠䒐䎀.

䆀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐰䐐䏰䍐䒀䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䎀 䌠 䏰䏠䎰䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 (䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䑰䌀䐐䐠䏐䏠䐐䐠) 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀 䏠䌐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䐐 䑰䍐䐠䎀䐀䎀 䐠䍐䏀䎀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐: 䍀䌠䎀䍠䍐䒐䎀 䐐䎀䎰䎀; 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀; 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀䎀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䎠䌀; 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䐀䍐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐.

䇰䐀䍐䌰䎰䍐䍀䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䌐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䌠䌀 䎀 䏐䏠䐀䏀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀 䐀䌀䏀䎠䌀 䌠 䏠䌐䎰䌀䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䌀 䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䓰䌠䌀 䏐䌀䎰䎀䑰䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䏐䏠䍠䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䎀 䎀 䏰䏠䍀䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䌠䎀 䌀䎠䐠䏠䌠䍐, 䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䒐䎀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䌀䐐䏰䍐䎠䐠䎀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䎀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䎀䐠䍐 䎐 䍐䎰䍐䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀 (䈠䌀䌐䎰.2).

䈠䌀䌐䎰䎀䑠䌀 2: 䅰䄀䆠䇠䇐䇠䄠䄀 䆀 䇐䇠䈀䇀䄀䈠䆀䄠䇐䄀 䄐䄀䅰䄀 䄠 䈀 䄐䊠䆰䄰䄀䈀䆀䋰 䈐 䇠䈠䇐䇠䊀䅐䇐䆀䅐 䆠䊠䇀 䄰䈀䄀䅀䈐䆠䄀䈠䄀 䇀䇠䄐䆀䆰䇐䇠䈐䈠

䅰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䌀 䎀 䍀䌠䎀䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䌠 䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䍐䏐 䏀䌀䒐䌀䌐

Page 37: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

37

䅰䌀䎠䏠䏐 䍰䌀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠

䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀 䍰䌀䍀䒠䎰䍠䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍀䌀 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䓰䐠 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀 䐐䑐䍐䏀䎀

䅰䌀䎠䏠䏐 䍰䌀 䏰䒠䐠䎀䒐䌀䐠䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠 䎀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䏰䏠䍀䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䒠䐠䎀䒐䌀䐠䌀

䅰䌀䎠䏠䏐 䍰䌀 䍀䌠䎀䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏰䏠 䏰䒠䐠䎀䒐䌀䐠䌀

䅰䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䎀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䌠 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䅰䌀䎠䏠䏐 䍰䌀 䐰䐐䐠䐀䏠䎐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀

‘䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䏐䍐䐀䌀䍰䍀䍐䎰䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䐰䐐䐠䐀䏠䎐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䎀 䐠䓰䑐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䍰䌀䐐䐠䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐.’

䅰䌀䎠䏠䏐 䍰䌀 䐐䏠䌐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䅰䌀䎠䏠䏐 䍰䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐

䇰䏠䍀䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䌠䎀 䌀䎠䐠䏠䌠䍐䇐䌀䐀䍐䍀䌐䌀 2/15.03.2002 䍰䌀 䐰䐐䎰䏠䌠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䎀 䐀䍐䍀䌀 䍰䌀 䐰䐠䌠䒠䐀䍠䍀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀

䐐䑐䍐䏀䎀 䎀 䍰䌀 䏠䐐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䒠䐠䏐䎀䑠䎀 䐐 䌀䌠䐠䏠䌐䐰䐐䎀 䎀 䎰䍐䎠䎀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀.

䇐䌀䐀䍐䍀䌐䌀 2/29.06.2004 䍰䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䍐䎠䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䏀䐰䏐䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䏠-䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀 䏐䌀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 -䐀䍐䌰䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䎀䓰 䌐䐀䏠䎐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䌰䌀䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䇀䇰䈐 䌠 䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䍐䎠䐠䎀䐠䍐

䄠䒠䏰䐀䍐䎠䎀 䍀䍐䎠䎰䌀䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐠䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀 䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䎀 䏐䍐䍀䏠䐐䐠䌀䐠䒠䑠䎀 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䎀䏀䐰䎰䎀 䍰䌀 䐠䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䒠䌠䎠䌀䌠䎀 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏰䏠 䏠䐠䏐䏠䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䑀䏠䐀䏀䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䐠䏐䓀䏠䐀䐐䐠䌠䏠. 䇠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀 䐐䍐 䎀 䏐䌀䎰䎀䑰䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䍐䐀䎀䏠䍰䏐䎀 䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏠䌠䎀 䌐䌀䐀䎀䍐䐀䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀 䏰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䏠䌠䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀, 䍀䏠䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䍐䌰䐰䎰䌀䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐, 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䐐䒠䐐 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 (䌐䐀䏠䓰䐠 䍰䌀䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䏠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䏰䐀䎀 䏰䏠䎰䐰䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䍰䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䍰䌀 䏐䏠䌠䏠 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠) 䎀䍰䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀 䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䎀 䏐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏰䏠䎰䌀䌰䌀 䐐䒠䍰䍀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰䎀/ 䌰䌀䐀䌀䍠䎀 䍰䌀 䌠䍐䎰䏠䐐䎀䏰䍐䍀䎀. 䈐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䏰䐀䏠䏰䐰䐐䎠 䍐 䎀 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠, 䎠䏠䎐䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䏐䏠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠 䐐 䏠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䍐䏐 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠. (䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䍐䎠䐠 ADD HOME – “䈰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䌠 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䏐䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀”, 䐰䑰䌀䐐䐠䏐䎀䑠䎀 䏠䐠 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰, 䄰䍐䐀䏀䌀䏐䎀䓰, 䆀䐠䌀䎰䎀䓰, 䄀䌠䐐䐠䐀䎀䓰 䎀 䈐䎰䏠䌠䍐䏐䎀䓰).

䅐䍀䎀䏐 䏠䐠 䐐䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐 䐐 䌐䐰䐀䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䌠 䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䍀䍐䐐䍐䐠䎀䎰䍐䐠䎀䍐, 䎠䏠䎐䐠䏠 䍀䏠䌐䐀䍐 䎀䎰䓠䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䑀䎀䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 䌠 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀, 䏐䏠 䎀 䐐䎰䏠䍠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏀 䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏠䏠䌐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䏠䐐䐠 䐐 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䅰䌀䏰䌀䍀䏐䌀 䅐䌠䐀䏠䏰䌀, 䍐 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䎀䓰䐠䌀. 䅀䍐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䐰䐐䎰䐰䌰䎀 䍐 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䏐䌀 䍰䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䎀, 䏐䏠 䌠 䉠䆀䅐 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䒠䐠 䐐䍐 䑐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀 䐐 䎀䍰䎠䎰䓠䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䌀 䍀䎀䏐䌀䏀䎀䎠䌀. 䇠䐐䌠䍐䏐 䑰䍐 䎀䏀䌀 䍀䒠䎰䌐䏠䎠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䎀䎠䏠䏐䏠䏀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䎀䑠䎀, 䐠䏠䎐 䏠䎠䌀䍰䌠䌀 䌠䎰䎀䓰䏐䎀䍐 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䏀䏠䍀䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䍀䌠䎀䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䌠䒠䌠 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䎀䍰䐠䏠䑰䏐䏠䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐.

Page 38: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

38

䇰䐀䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䍰䏀䌀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀䓰䐠 䐐䍐䎠䐠䏠䐀 䍐 䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䌠䏐䌀 䐐䏠䌐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠; 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐 (䉠䈰䇀, 䄰䈰䇀, 䈀䈰䇀) 䐐䍐 䐀䌀䍰䏰䏠䎰䌀䌰䌀䐠 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䎀䎰䎀 䌠 䐀䌀䎐䏠䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䏠䌠䍐, 䍀䏠䌐䐀䍐 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䍐䏐䎀 䏠䐠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䐀䍐䍠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠. 䇰䐀䎀䌠䌀䐠䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䎀 䍀䍐-䎠䏠䏐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䌐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䌠 䉠䆀䅐 䏰䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏐䌀 ‘䏰䐀䍐䑐䏠䍀䌀’ 䎀 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䏠䎠䐰䏰䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䌀 䐐䏰䏠䐐䏠䌐䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䎀 䌰䐀䐰䏰䎀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䐐䒠䌠䏰䌀䍀䌀 䐐 䐠䐀䐰䍀䍐䏐 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䏐䌀 䅰䌀䏰䌀䍀, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐠䏠䑰䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䌀䐐䎀䒐䌀䏐䍐, 䌀 䎀䏀䌀 䎀 䐀䍐䌰䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䐠䌀䌠䌀䏐䎀 䏐䌀 䍀䏠䏰䐰䐐䐠䎀䏀䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐. 䈠䌀䎠䌀, 䏠䐠 䎠䐀䌀䓰 䏐䌀 1990䐠䍐 䐐䍐 䏐䌀䌐䎰䓠䍀䌀䌠䌀 䌐䒠䐀䍰䏠 䏐䌀䌠䎰䎀䍰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䑰䐰䍠䍀䎀 䎠䌀䏰䎀䐠䌀䎰䎀, 䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䌀䏐䎀䎀 䎀 䏠䌐䍐䎠䐠䎀 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䍰䍐䏀䍐䍀䍐䎰䐐䎠䌀 䍰䍐䏀䓰 䏰䏠䎠䐀䌀䎐 䏀䌀䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䎰䎀䐠䍐. 䈐䐀䍐䍀 䑀䌀䎠䐠䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐, 䐰䎰䍐䐐䏐䓰䌠䌀䒐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䌀 䌠 䉠䆀䅐, 䐐䌀 䐐䎰䌀䌐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏰䐀䍐䏀䌀䑐䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 (䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䍐䐐䐠䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䐠䌀䎠䏠䌠䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐); 䐠䐀䐰䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐀䍐䌰䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䍰䍐䏀䓰䐠䌀 䎀 䒀䎀䐀䏠䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䐀䐰䏰䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀 䐐䑐䍐䏀䎀; 䐐䎀䏀䌠䏠䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䌠䎀䐠䍐 䏀䏠䍀䍐䐀䏐䎀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䏠䌐䍐䎠䐠䎀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀䐠 䐐䎀䏐䏠䏐䎀䏀䎀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀䍐 䎀 䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䌐䏠䐀䌀. 䇠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䎀 䐐䒠䐐 䅰䌀䏰䌀䍀䏐䌀 䅐䌠䐀䏠䏰䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䓰䌠䌀䐠 䌠 䐠䏠䌠䌀, 䑰䍐 䍀䍐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䐰䐐䎰䐰䌰䎀 (䌀) 䐐䍐 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌠䌀 䌐䒠䐀䍰䏠, 䌠 䐀䌀䏀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䍀䍐䐐䍐䐠䎀䎰䍐䐠䎀䍐 (䏰䐀䍐䍰 1995 䌠 䉠䆀䅐 䎀䏀䌀 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䏀䏠䎰䌀, 䏰䐀䍐䍰 2005 䐠䍐 䐐䌀 500); (䌐) 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䍀䎀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䏠 䎠䏠䏀䏰䌀䎠䐠䏐䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐, 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䏐䎀 䏠䐠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠; (䌠) 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䍀䍐䎠䏠䏐䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰, 䌀 䏐䍐 䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀 䌠䍐䑰䍐 䐐䒠䍰䍀䌀䍀䍐䏐䎀 䐐䒠䐐䐀䍐䍀䏠䐠䏠䑰䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䌀 䎀 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䐠.䍐. 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀 䎠䎰䎀䍐䏐䐠䎀, 䎀䍀䌠䌀䒐䎀 䏠䐠䍀䌀䎰䍐䑰䍐 䎀 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䎀䓰 䏰䏠䐠䏠䎠; (䍀) 䏠䌐䍐䎠䐠䎀䐠䍐 䐐䌀 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䏠 䐐䏠䌐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䌠䍐䐀䎀䌰䎀 䐐 䏠䌰䐀䏠䏀䏐䎀 䌰䏠䍀䎀䒀䏐䎀 䏰䍐䑰䌀䎰䌐䎀, 䌐䎰䎀䍰䎠䎀 䍀䏠 䎀䎰䎀 䍀䏠䐀䎀 䏐䌀䍀䑐䌠䒠䐀䎰䓰䒐䎀 䌐䐀䐰䐠䏐䎀䓰 䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䍐䏐 䏰䐀䏠䍀䐰䎠䐠 䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 ‘䌠 䏰䐀䍐䑐䏠䍀’2. 䄠䒠䌠 䄠䍐䎰䎀䎠䏠䌐䐀䎀䐠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䒠䐠 䍐 䍰䌀䏰䏠䑰䏐䌀䎰 䏠䐠 1970-䐠䍐 䎀 䎀䏀䌀 䌠䎀䍀䎀䏀䎀 䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䎀䑠䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 1980-䐠䍐, 䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 1990䐠䍐 䍐 䏰䏠䍀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䌰䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏰䏠䐀䌀䍀䎀 䏠䐠䑰䍐䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䏐䎀 䌠䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䎀䑠䎀 (䍰䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀; 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䍐䏀䎀; 䍀䎀䐐䎠䐀䎀䏀䎀䏐䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䏀䏠䐠䏠䐀䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐; 䍰䌀䏀䒠䐀䐐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䏰䐀䎀䑰䎀䏐䍐䏐䏠 䏠䐠 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䒠䐠䐰䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰. 䄠 䇰䐀䌀䌰䌀 䎀 䄠䌀䐀䒀䌀䌠䌀 䍐䍀䌠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 2001 䐐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌠䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀 䏠䐠 䑰䌀䐐䐠䏐䎀 䑀䎀䐀䏀䎀 䑰䌀䐐䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐰䑰䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏰䐀䎀 䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䐰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐠.䏐. 䄠 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠 䐐䌀 䏐䌀䏰䐀䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀 䎀䍰䌠䏠䍀䎀 䍰䌀 䏐䌀䐠䎀䐐䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䏐䍐䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䑀䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䐰䐐䌠䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䒀䎰䍐䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀 䎀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏠䐠 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䎀 䏠䑠䍐䏐䎠䎀 䏐䌀 䌠䒠䍰䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䎀䓰䐠䌀 (retail impact assessment) 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀 䏰䏠䌠䏠䍀 䍀䌀 䌐䒠䍀䍐 䏰䏠䌠䍀䎀䌰䏐䌀䐠 䎀 䌠䒠䏰䐀䏠䐐䒠䐠 䍰䌀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏠䐠 ‘䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏐䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䌰䐀䐰䏰䎀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠’,

2 䐐䒠䌰䎰䌀䐐䏐䏠 䑠䎀䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䉐䌀䐀䌠䌀䐀䍀 䍰䌀 2000䌰. (Musil, 2005) 䌠䍐䐀䎀䌰䌀䐠䌀 Carrefour 䎀䏀䌀 䏰䐀䎀䑐䏠䍀 52 䏀䎰䐀䍀. $, 䍀䏠䎠䌀䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䐐䒠䒐䎀䓰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䄐䇐䇰 䏐䌀 䉰䍐䑐䎀䓰 䍐 56.4, 䈰䏐䌰䌀䐀䎀䓰 - 48.4; 䈀䐰䏀䒠䏐䎀䓰 – 33.7; 䈐䎰䏠䌠䌀䎠䎀䓰 – 19.3 䏀䎰䐀䍀. $.

Page 39: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

39

䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䏠䐠䐐䐠䏠䓰䌠䌀䐠 䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䐐䏰䌀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䎀䏐䍐䏐 䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠 䍰䌀 䍰䌀䒐䎀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䐀䏠䍀䌀䐠䌀 䎀 䏐䌀 䑰䏠䌠䍐䒀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏠䌐䒐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䌠䒠䌠 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䍐䌠䐀䏠䏰䍐䎐䐐䎠䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐 (Garb&Dybicz, 2006).

䅰䌀 䐐䒠䍠䌀䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䐰 䏐䌀䐐 䐠䌀䎠䎀䌠䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䌠䐐䍐 䏠䒐䍐 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌠䌀䐠. 䈀䌀䍰䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠 䏰䒠䐀䌠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䍐䎠䐠 䏐䌀 䈀䌀䏀䎠䏠䌠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䇠䈰䇰 䏐䌀 䈐䐠䏠䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䏰䐰䐐䏐䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀䐀䌀 䑠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䏀䐰 䏰䏠 䏠䐠䏐䏠䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䓰䑐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏠䌐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䏠䐐䐠 䎀 䐐䒠䏠䐠䏐䏠䐐䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠; 䍀䌀 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀 䏰䐀䎀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐠䎀䐠䍐, 䌀䎠䐠䓀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䐀䍐䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䌠䒠䌠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䍀䌀 䏠䐠䎠䐀䏠䎀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䎀䐠䍐 䑐䏠䐀䎀䍰䏠䏐䐠䌀䎰䏐䎀 䎀 䌠䍐䐀䐠䎀䎠䌀䎰䏐䎀 䌠䐀䒠䍰䎠䎀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍐䎰䍐䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀/ 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䏰䏠 䐀䍐䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 –䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌐䌀䐀䎀䍐䐀䎀/ 䎠䏠䏐䑀䎰䎀䎠䐠䎀 䎀 䏐䍐䐐䒠䏠䐠䌠䍐䐠䐐䐠䌠䎀䓰 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䎀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐠䎀, 䏐䏠 䎀 䏰䏠䐠䍐䏐䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀/ 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䌠䌀䒐䎀 䐐䍐 䐐䒠䐠䐀䐰䍀䏐䎀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䌀/ 䏰䌀䐀䐠䏐䓀䏠䐀䐐䐠䌠䌀. 䄀 䏠䒐䍐 䏐䍐䏐䌀䐰䑰䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍀䏠 䍀䏐䍐䐐 䐰䐀䏠䑠䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀 䎀 䐐䏠䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䐰䐐䐠䐀䏠䎐䐐䐠䌠䏠 䐐䌀 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䐐 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐐䐀䌀䌠䏐䓰䐠 䏰䐀䏠䎠䎰䌀䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䏠䐀䏀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䎀 䎠䏠䏐䑠䍐䏰䑠䎀䎀 䐐 䏠䐐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐀䍐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䎀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䐠 䑀䌀䎠䐠䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐, 䏰䐀䎀䑰䎀䏐䎀䎰䎀 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䐀䌀䍰䏀䎀䏐䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐.

䅰䌀䎠䎰䓠䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐䄐䒠䎰䌰䌀䐀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䎀 䍀䏐䍐䐐 䐐䌀 䏠䑰䍐䌠䎀䍀䏐䏠 䎀䍰䏰䐀䌀䌠䍐䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀 䍰䏐䌀䑰䎀䏀䎀 䎀

䏐䍐䏠䐠䎰䏠䍠䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䍰䌠䎀䎠䌀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐. 䈐䐀䍐䍀 䐠䓰䑐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䎀䏀䌀䐠 䏰䐀䎀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐠䏐䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䎀 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀䐠 䌰䒠䌠䎠䌀䌠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑀䍐䐐䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰, 䑰䐰䌠䐐䐠䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䎠䒠䏀 䎀䍰䏀䍐䏐䓰䒐䎀 䐐䍐 䐰䐐䎰䏠䌠䎀䓰 䎀 䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀, 䏐䏠 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䏐䎀 䐐䏰䐀䓰䏀䏠 䍀䒠䎰䌰䏠䐐䐀䏠䑰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䎀䑠䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䐐䎠䎀 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀. 䄠 䏰䐀䏠䐠䎀䌠䍐䏐 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌀䎐 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䌀䌠䌀䒐䏠 䍰䌀䐐䎀䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䏠䐠䏠䐀䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䒐䍐 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀 䍀䌀 䐐䐠䎀䏀䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䐰䌐䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰, 䍀䌀 䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䑐䏠䍀䌠䌀 䏐䍐䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䌠䎀, 䏀䌀䐠䍐䐀䎀䌀䎰䍐䏐 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䐀䍐䐐䐰䐀䐐, 䍀䌀 䏀䌀䐀䌰䎀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䓰 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䎀 䍀䌀 䐀䌀䍰䐀䐰䒀䌀䌠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䐠䒠䎠䌀䏐 䎀 䎠䐰䎰䐠䐰䐀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䍀䍐䏐䐠䎀䑰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐. 䅰䌀䍀䒠䎰䌐䏠䑰䍐䏐䏠 䏠䐐䏀䎀䐐䎰䓰䏐䍐 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀 䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏠䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䎀䍀䍐䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏰䐀䌀䌰䏀䌀䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠; 䍰䌀 䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䌠 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 –䏠䐐䒠䍰䏐䌀䌠 䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䑰䍐 䐐䏰䏠䏐䐠䌀䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 䌠䎀䏐䌀䌰䎀 䏰䐀䏠䏀䍐䏐䓰䐠 䏐䌀䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䑠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䍐䎠䐐䏰䍐䐀䐠䎀䐠䍐-䐰䐀䌐䌀䏐䎀䐐䐠䎀, 䏐䏠 䎀 䏠䐐䒠䍰䏐䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏠䐠 䎀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䎀䏐䏐䌀 䌠䎀䍰䎀䓰 䎀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䎀 䏠䐠 䎀䏐䐠䍐䌰䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䎀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠 䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏠䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䑠䓰䎰䏠䐐䐠䏐䏠䐠䏠 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐.

䆰䎀䐠䍐䐀䌀䐠䐰䐀䌀:Bertaud, A. (2004) The Spatial Structures of Central and Eastern European cities: more

European than Socialist? International symposium on post-communist cities, The Russian and East European Center (REEC), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, June 17-19,

Page 40: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

40

Garb, Y., T. Dybicz (2006). The retail revolution in post-socialist Central Europe and its lessons. In Tsenkova, S. & Z. Nedovic-Budic (eds) The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe. Space, Institutions and Policy.

EEA (2002). Towards an urban atlas. Assessment of spatial data on 25 European cities and urban areas, Environmental issue report No 30, Copenhagen

Nuissl, H., D.Rink (2003). Urban Sprawl and Post-socialist Transformation. The Case of Leipzig(Germany), UFZ-Bericht 4/2003, UFZ Centre for Environmental Research, Dept. of Economics, Sociology and Law.

Musil, J. (2005). Why socialist and post-socialist cities are important for forward-looking urban studies. Paper presented at Forward look on urban Science conference, Helsinki, 26-28 May.

UITP (International Association of Public Transport) (2005) Mobility in Cities. www.uitp.com䇀䈀䈀䄐 (2007) 䇠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀 “䈀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐” 2007-2013. 䄰䎰䌀䌠䏐䌀

䍀䎀䐀䍐䎠䑠䎀䓰 “䇰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐”, 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰. http://www.europa.bg

Page 41: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

41

䅐䇀䆀䆰 䇰䅐䈠䈀䇠䄠䈀䒠䎠䏠䌠䏠䍀䎀䐠䍐䎰䅐䎰䍐䎠䐠䐀䏠䏐䏐䎀 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䎠䎀

“䉠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䍰䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠” 䅐䇠䇠䅀䇰䏠䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐“䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠”

䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰05.10.2009䌰.

䄠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䎀 䏰䏠䐠䍐䏐䑠䎀䌀䎰 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐䍰䌀

䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀 䌠 䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰

䄰䍐䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐䆀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䈐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀 (䄰䆀䈐)

n 䈐䏰䍐䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀 䍰䌀䐐䒠䌐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐, 䏠䌐䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䎠䌀, 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰

䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀(䌰䍐䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䎀) 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䎀

䌰䍐䏐䍐䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䍐䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䌀䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰.

Page 42: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

42

䆠䏠䏀䏰䏠䏐䍐䏐䐠䎀 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐n 䄰䍐䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䎀䐠䍐 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䎀 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀䐠 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠

䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䎀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䏠䏐䍐䏐䐠䎀:

䄰䆀䈐 䌐䌀䍰䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀

n 䄰䆀䈐 䌐䌀䍰䌀䐠䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌀䌠䎰䓰䌠䌀 䏠䐀䌰䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䌀䐐䒠䌠䎠䐰䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏰䏠 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䌀䎰䍐䏐 䏐䌀䑰䎀䏐䌠䍰䌀䎀䏀䏐䏠 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䌰䍐䏠䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀.

n 䈐䒠䍰䍀䌀䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䐠䌀䎠䌀, 䑰䍐 䍀䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䌐䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䌠䌀䐠 䎀䏰䏠䍀䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䐠 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀 䏀䌀䐐䎀䌠䎀 䎀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐䎀䍰䌠䎰䎀䑰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䏐䏠䏠䌐䐀䌀䍰䏐䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏰䐀䎀䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䄰䆀䈐 䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䓰.

Page 43: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

43

䈠䍐䏀䌀䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䐐䎰䏠䍐䌠䍐

n 䅀䌀䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䄰䆀䈐 䐐䌀 䏠䐀䌰䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䌠䒠䌠 䐐䒠䌠䎠䐰䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠䏠䐠 䐠䍐䏀䌀䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䐐䎰䏠䍐䌠e.

䈀䍐䎰䍐䑀 䅰䍐䏀䍐䏰䏠䎰. 䄠䏠䍀䎀 䇰䒠䐠䎀䒐䌀 䄀䍀䏀䎀䏐.

䇰䐀䍐䍀䎀䏀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䎀䎰䎀 䍰䌀䒐䏠 䍀䌀䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏀䍐 䄰䆀䈐

§ 䄰䆀䈐 䐠䍐䑐䏐䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰䐠䌀䍐 䑠䍐䏐䏐䌀 䐐 䐠䏠䌠䌀, 䑰䍐 䏰䏠䍰䌠䏠䎰䓰䌠䌀:

§ 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠䎀, 䐠䍐䏐䍀䍐䏐䑠䎀䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀

§ 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䏰䐀䍐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䏐䎀 䐐䎀䐠䐰䌀䑠䎀䎀

§ 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䌀 䐐 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䏠䌐䍐䏀䎀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀

§ 䏰䐀䍐䍀䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䓰䏐䍐䏐䌀 䌰䍐䏠䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀䎀 䐰䐐䎰䐰䌰䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䆀䏐䐠䍐䐀䏐䍐䐠

§ 䌠䍰䎀䏀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䏠-䍀䏠䌐䐀䎀 䎀 䌀䍀䍐䎠䌠䌀䐠䏐䎀 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰

Page 44: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

44

§ 䄰䍐䏠䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䍀䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䐠 䏰䏠-䎰䍐䐐䏐䏠 䌠 䐐䐠䌀䏐䍀䌀䐀䐠䍐䏐 䄰䆀䈐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䐠.

§ 䅀䌀䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䑠䎀䑀䐀䏠䌠 䌠䎀䍀 䏰䏠-䎰䍐䐐䏐䏠 䐐䍐 䐀䍐䍀䌀䎠䐠䎀䐀䌀䐠 䎀 䌀䎠䐠䐰䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䐠.

§ 䈠䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䏐䌀䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䌠䎀䍰䐰䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䌠 䄰䆀䈐䍐 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䏰䏠-䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠.

n 䈐䒠䍰䍀䌀䍀䍐䏐䎀䓰䐠 䎠䐀䌀䍐䏐 䏰䐀䏠䍀䐰䎠䐠 䐐 䄰䆀䈐 䍐 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䏰䏠-䏰䏠䎰䍐䍰䍐䏐 䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䏐䎀 䑠䍐䎰䎀.

䇰䐀䍐䍀䎀䏀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䎀䎰䎀 䍰䌀䒐䏠 䍀䌀䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏀䍐 䄰䆀䈐

n 䈐 䏰䏠䏀䏠䒐䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎰䍐䐐䏐䏠 䐐䍐 䏠䌐䏀䍐䏐䓰䐠䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀.

n 䇀䐀䍐䍠䏠䌠䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䑐䏐䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䎀 䏰䏠䍰䌠䏠䎰䓰䌠䌀䐠 䍐䍀䏐䏠䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䏠 䍀䌀 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䓰䐠 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䐐 䍐䍀䏐䎀 䎀 䐐䒠䒐䎀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䌠 䄰䆀䈐 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀.

n 䈐 䄰䆀䈐 䐀䓰䍰䎠䏠 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䎀䍰䌠䏠䍀䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䐰䍀䌀, 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䐐䏰䍐䐐䐠䓰䌠䌀䐠䑀䎀䏐䌀䏐䐐䏠䌠䎀䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀, 䐠䐀䐰䍀 䎀 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐.

䇰䐀䍐䍀䎀䏀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䎀䎰䎀 䍰䌀䒐䏠 䍀䌀䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏀䍐 䄰䆀䈐

Page 45: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

45

䆠䌀䎠䌠䏠 䏀䏠䍠䍐䏀 䍀䌀 䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䏀 䐐 䄰䆀䈐?

n 䅀䌀 䐐䒠䌐䎀䐀䌀䏀䍐, 䏠䌐䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䌠䌀䏀䍐 䎀 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏀䍐 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 (䌰䍐䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䎀) 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䎀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰.

n 䅀䌀 䐐䒠䍰䍀䌀䌠䌀䏀䍐 䎠䌀䐀䐠䎀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䏀䏠䍀䍐䎰䎀 䍰䌀 䍀䌀䍀䍐䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰.

n 䅀䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏀䍐 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䌀䎰䏐䎀䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠䎀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰䏠䌐䍐䎠䐠䎀䐠䍐 䌠 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠.

n 䅀䌀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䓰䌠䌀䏀䍐 䐐䎰䏠䍠䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠 - 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䌠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䎀 (䎠䌀䐠䏠䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䎀 䍀䐀.).

n 䅀䌀 䏰䐀䏠䎀䌰䐀䌀䌠䌀䏀䍐 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䎀 䐐䑠䍐䏐䌀䐀䎀䎀䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐.

n 䆀 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀...

䄰䆀䈐 䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠䍰䌀 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀” 䌠 䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰

§ 䆀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠䏐䌀 䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䏰䏠䐀䏠䍀䍐䏐䏠 䏠䐠 䐠䒠䐀䐐䍐䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀 䏐䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䎀:

§ 䇰䒠䎰䏐䌀 䎀䏐䌠䍐䏐䐠䌀䐀䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀䎀 䍰䏐䌀䎠䏠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐠䏠䏰䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠 - 䎠䒠䍀䍐, 䎠䌀䎠䌠䎀 䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠?

§ 䇐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠 䏰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䐐 䑠䍐䎰 䏠䏰䐠䎀䏀䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀䏐䌀 䍰䌠䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀” .

§ 䈐 䏰䏠䏀䏠䒐䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䎀䑰䏐䎀 䌰䍐䏠䏀䌀䐀䎠䍐䐠䎀䏐䌰䏠䌠䎀䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰, 䌐䌀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏐䌀䑠䍐䎰䍐䌠䌀䐠䌀 䄰䆀䈐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䍀䏠䌐䐀䎀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䏐䌀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䌀䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀.

Page 46: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

46

䄰䆀䈐 䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

§ 䄰䆀䈐 䐀䌀䍰䏰䏠䎰䌀䌰䌀䐐 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䏠

䐀䌀䍰䏐䏠䏠䌐䐀䌀䍰䎀䍐 䏠䐠䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䓰,

䑰䐀䍐䍰 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠“䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”䏰䏠䎰䐰䑰䌀䌠䌀 䐐䌠䏠䓰䐠䌀

䏐䏠䌠䌀䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀

䌠䎀䍰䎀䓰.

䈠䓰 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䎀䐠䍐䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䎀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䏠䏐䍐䏐䐠䎀:

§ 䈰䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏀䐀䍐䍠䌀

§ 䅰䌀䐐䐠䐀䏠䍐䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀

§ 䈐䌰䐀䌀䍀䍐䏐 䑀䏠䏐䍀

§ 䇰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀

§ 䅰䏐䌀䎠䏠䌠䏠 䐐䐠䏠䏰䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠

䈐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐 䌐䌀䍰䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䌠“䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

Page 47: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

47

䈐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐 䌐䌀䍰䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䌠“䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

n 䈰䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏀䐀䍐䍠䌀, 䍰䌀䐐䐠䐀䏠䍐䏐䎀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䎀, 䐐䌰䐀䌀䍀䍐䏐 䑀䏠䏐䍀:

§ 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䍐 䌐䌀䍰䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠䐐䍐 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䌠䌀 䎀

䏠䐀䌰䌀䏐䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀 䄰䆀䈐䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䍰䌀“䈐䆀䇐䋰䅰䇠䇐䄀” 䌠

䌰䐀.䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰.

§ 䄐䎰䌀䌰䏠䍀䌀䐀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䓰䑐䐐䍐 䎰䏠䎠䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀

䐠䏠䑰䏐䏠䐠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䏠䏰䏠䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀

䍰䏐䌀䎠䏠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐠䏠䏰䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䏠

䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐.

§ 䇰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䎀 䍰䏐䌀䎠䏠䌠䏠 䐐䐠䏠䏰䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠:

§ 䈀䌀䌐䏠䐠䌀 䐐 䐠䓰䑐 䍐䎀䍰䎠䎰䓠䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠

䍀䎀䏐䌀䏀䎀䑰䏐䌀, 䎠䌀䐠䏠䏰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀䐠䌀 䏰䏠䍰䌠䏠䎰䓰

䏰䏠䐐䐠䏠䓰䏐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䎀䏀䐀䍐䍀䌀䎠䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀䏠䌐䏐䏠䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐.

䈐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐 䌐䌀䍰䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䌠“䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

Page 48: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

48

䄰䆀䈐 䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”§ 䄰䆀䈐 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎰䌀䌰䌀

䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍀䌀䐐䍐 䏰䐀䌀䌠䓰䐠

䍰䌀䏰䎀䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䎠䒠䏀䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐“䐐䎰䏠䍐䌠䍐”.

§ 䅰䌀䏰䎀䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀(䐐䏰䐀䌀䌠䎠䎀䐠䍐)

䍀䌀䌠䌀䐠䐐䌠䏠䍐䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䌀䐐䐠䌀䐠䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䌀䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 .

䄰䆀䈐 䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

§ 䇀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐䏰䐀䌀䌠䓰䐠

䍰䌀䏰䎀䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀䐠䏠䌠䌀 䎠䒠䍀䍐 䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠

䏐䌀 䌐䐀䏠䎐 䐐䌀䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌠䎀䍀䏠䌠䍐

䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰䅰䇠䇐䄀”.

Page 49: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

49

䄰䆀䈐 䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

§䇰䏠䍀䏠䌐䏐䌀 䍐䐐䎀䐠䐰䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䍐 䐐

䌠䎀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐.

䇰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䄐䐀䏠䎐䈐䎀䏐䓰䍰䏠䏐䌀 24

䆀䏐䌠䌀䎰䎀䍀䏐䎀䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 2

䄰䆀䈐 䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

§ 䄰䆀䈐䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠

䐰䐐䏰䍐䒀䏐䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䓰䌠䌀䍰䏐䌀䎠䏠䌠䏠䐠䏠䐐䐠䏠䏰䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䏠

䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰䅰䇠䇐䄀”.

Page 50: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

50

䄰䆀䈐 䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”

§ 䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏰䏠 䏰䏠䐐䐠䏠䓰䏐䍐䏐 䌀䍀䐀䍐䐐䑰䐀䍐䍰 䌠䎀䏐䍐䐠䏐䎀 䐐䐠䎀䎠䍐䐀䎀 䐐䒠䒐䏠 䐐䍐䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀 䏠䐠 䍀䍐䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐.

“䉠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䍰䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠” - 䏐䏠䌠䎀䏐䐰䍠䍀䎀 䏐䌀䎰䌀䌰䌀䒐䎀 䐀䌀䍰䌠䎀䐠䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䄰䆀䈐

䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠

n 䇐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠 䍐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䎰䍐䎠䐐䏐䏠 䐀䍐䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐䐐 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀 䌠䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰 䌠 䍐䍀䎀䏐䏐䌀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䌰䐀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀 – 䄰䆀䈐.

n 䇰䐀䎀䎰䌀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䏠 - 䐠䍐䑐䏐䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䎀䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀 䎀䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䑠䎀䎀 䌠 䏠䏰䍐䐀䌀䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䐠䍐䌰䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䌀.

n 䇐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠 䍐 䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌠䍰䍐䏀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䓰.

n 䇠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰 䍀䏠 䌠䌀䍠䏐䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰.

Page 51: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

51

䆠䌀䎠䌠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䎀䍠䍀䌀䏀䍐?

n 䆀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䑠䓰䎰䏠䐐䐠䏐䏠 䄰䆀䈐 䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐䍰䌀 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀 䌠 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰.

n 䆀䏐䐠䍐䌰䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀 䐀䍐䐐䐰䐀䐐䎀, 䎀䏀䌀䒐䎀䏠䐠䏐䏠䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䎠䒠䏀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀 -䍀䍐䏀䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䌀䌐䌀䍰䌀, 䐰䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏀䐀䍐䍠䌀, 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠, “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀”, 䐐䌠䍐䐠䏠䑀䌀䐀䏐䎀 䐰䐀䍐䍀䌐䎀 䎀 䍀䐀.

䆠䌀䎠䌠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䎀䍠䍀䌀䏀䍐?

n 䇠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䏐䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀 䍰䌀 䏀䏠䏐䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䏐䌰, 䎠䏠䏐䐠䐀䏠䎰 䎀䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀.

n 䇠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䎀䌠䍐䏐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰 䍀䏠 䌠䌀䍠䏐䌀 䍰䌀䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰- 䍰䌀䍀䐀䒠䐐䐠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰, 䐀䍐䏀䏠䏐䐠䎀, 䏐䎀䌠䏠 䏐䌀䍰䌀䏰䒠䎰䏐䓰䍐䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀䌠 “䈐䆀䇐䋰 䅰䇠䇐䄀” 䎀 䍀䐀.

Page 52: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

52

䇰䒠䎰䏐䌀 䎀䏐䌠䍐䏐䐠䌀䐀䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀 䎀 䑀䌀䎠䐠䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠

䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀

§䈐䒠䐐䐠䏠䓰䏐䎀䍐䎀䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䏐䌀 䐰䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀䐠䌀䏀䐀䍐䍠䌀

§䈐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䍰䌀 䎠䏠䏐䐠䐀䏠䎰䎀 䐀䍐䌰䐰䎰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䌀䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䌀

§䆰䎀䏐䎀䎀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䎀䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠

§䈐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀䍰䌀䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐

§䇐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐

§䄐䎀䍰䏐䍐䐐 䎀 䍀䐀.

䇀䏠䍀䍐䎰䎀 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠

§ 䆀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀䏀䏠䍀䍐䎰䎀 䍰䌀

䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀

䌐䌀䍰䌀䐠䌀 䌀䎠䐠䐰䌀䎰䏐䌀䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䍰䌀䏠䌐䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䎠䌀䐠䌀 䌠

䌰䐀䌀䍀䌀.

* 䈠䏠䍰䎀 䏰䐀䎀䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐 䏀䏠䍀䍐䎰 䏰䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌀䌠䓰䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䐠䏠䍰䌀 䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䍀䏠 䈐䐠䏠䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䇠䌐䒐䎀䏐䌀.

Page 53: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

53

䄀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀 䍰䌀 䏠䏰䐠䎀䏀䎀䍰䌀䑠䎀䓰䏐䌀䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䏐䌀 䈐䏠䑀䎀䓰

§ 䄰䍐䏠䍀䍐䏀䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䎀䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀

§ 䈐䒠䐐䐠䏠䓰䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀䐠䌀

§ 䇰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䏐䎀䐰䑰䌀䐐䐠䒠䑠䎀 䎀䍀䐀.

䆀䍰䌰䐀䌀䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䑠䓰䎰䏠䐐䐠䏐䏠䄰䆀䈐䐐䒠䐀䌠䒠䐀䏐䏠䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐

§ 䆀䏐䐠䍐䌰䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䏰䏠䐀䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀䐐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䌠 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏰䐀䎀䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐.

§ 䇠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍀䎀䏐䌀䏀䎀䑰䏐䌀䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀 䍰䌀 䏠䌐䏀䍐䏐 䏐䌀䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 -䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䍰䌠䍐䏐䌀 䏐䌀 “䉠䄰䇀” 䅐䇠䇠䅀, 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䑐䏠䐀䌀䐠䌀 “䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䍐䏐”.

§ 䇠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐰䌐䎰䎀䑰䍐䏐䍀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰 䍀䏠 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䑰䐀䍐䍰䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䏐䍐䐠.

Page 54: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

54

KMS - 䅀䏠䐐䐠䒠䏰䏐䏠䐐䐠䍀䏠 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䑰䐀䍐䍰䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䏐䍐䐠

§ 䈐䎀䐐䐠䍐䏀䌀 䍰䌀䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䐐䒠䌐䎀䐠䎀䓰,

䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䎀 䐐 䏰䒠䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀䏠䌐䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䎠䌀 䏐䌀

䈐䐠䏠䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀䓰 䌰䐀䌀䍀.

䄐䎰䌀䌰䏠䍀䌀䐀䓰 䍰䌀 䄠䌀䒀䍐䐠䏠䌠䏐䎀䏀䌀䏐䎀䍐!

䅐䇀䆀䆰 䇰䅐䈠䈀䇠䄠GSM: +359 885 108 119

䐠䍐䎰. +359 2 801 52 15e-mail: [email protected]

Page 55: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

55

Parking surveys

Introduction – traffic surveys• 1. Analysis of the problem

– Problem definition: – Is there a problem? – Size of the problem? Location? At which moments?– Cause of the problem?– Do we need to know more about the situation? What?

• 2. Type of survey– Which relevant data is available?– Need to collect additionaldata? What data? How?

• 3. Data collection:– Execution of the survey

• 4. Analysis of the data• 5. Conclusions: possible solutions

Page 56: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

56

Introduction – traffic surveys• 1. Analysis of the problem

– Problem definition: – Is there a problem? – Size of the problem? Location? At which moments?– Causeof the problem?– Do we need to know more about the situation? What?

• 2. Type of survey– Which relevant data is available?– Need to collect additional data? What data? How?

• 3. Data collection:– Execution of the survey

• 4. Analysis of the data• 5. Conclusions: possible solutions

2. Types of surveys– Traffic counts

• Traffic counts• Junction counts• Origin-Destination-survey

– Traffic flow surveys• Speed survey• Queue length• Delay time• Travel time

– Parking survey• Parking capacity• Parking occupancy• Parking duration• Parking survey (motives)

– Cyclists / pedestrians• Counts• Traffic barrier (street

crossing)– Public transport survey

• Travel time• Bus stop use• Origin–destination survey

Page 57: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

57

2. Parking surveys• Parking capacity

• Parking occupancy• Parking duration• Parking motives

2.1 Parking capacity survey• Number of available (legal) parking places

per street (area)• Distinction per parking regime:

– Free parking– Payed parking– Blue zone (restricted parking duration)– Parking allowance(inhabitants, …)– Reserved places (taxi, handicapped, goods, …)

• To be compared to parking demand

Page 58: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

58

2.2 Parking occupancy survey• Number of parked cars per street (area)

– Including cars parked incorrectly (no ticket, ticket passedout, …)

– Including illegally parked cars (bus stop, double parking, …)

• Parking occupancy– Percentage of occupied parking places

= Parked carsCapacity

Parking problem if occupation > 85 %• Surveys for several moments

– Evolution during the day (bv. every 1 or 2 hours)– For working day, Saturday, Sunday, market day, …

2.2 Parking occupancy survey• Examples

Page 59: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

59

2.2 Parking occupancy survey• Example: daily evolution on weekday and

weekend days

2.3 Parking duration survey• Indicators:

– Average parking duration– Distribution of parking duration:

• share of short parking vs. long parking– Turn-over: average number of parked cars on one

parking place during a certain period• = number of cars parkedduring period

parking capacity• Indicator for efficient use of parking capacity, combining parking

occupancy and parking duration– 1 inhabitant parking his car during 9hà occupancy = 100% ; turn-over = 1

– 6 shoppingvisitors parking during 1,5hà occupancy = 100% ; turn-over = 6

– 3 shoppingvisitors parking during 1,5hà occupancy = 50% ; turn-over = 3

Page 60: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

60

2.3 Parking duration survey• Way of working:

– Survey in a selection of “ representative streets”– At fixed timings (every 15 or 30 minutes) for each parking place the

license plate number of the parkeed vehicle is noted. – The number of consecutive notations of the same license plate is a

measure for the parking duration– For the analysis, specifiedsoftware is available (e.g. Parkero)– Correctionshould be made because a part of the short parking is

missed

2.3 Parking duration survey• Results:

Parkeerduurverdeling weekdag

00,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,9

1

Meir

Grote M

arkt

Oudaan

Midden

Leien

Nation

alestr

aat -

Kloo

sterst

raat

Paarde

nmark

t

Steen -

Sint-P

aulus

Station

Zuid bi

nnen

Leien

Alle zo

nes

%

> 8uur4 -8 uur2 - 4 uur< 2 uur

Page 61: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

61

2.4 Parking motive survey• Why do people park their car?• For a rough estimation: “6-9-12-survey”:

– Parking occupationis measured at three moments– Occupation gives an idea of the major motives:

- at 6h: only inhabitants- at 9h: only employees- at 12h: employees + visitors (shops, recreation,)

• Parking interview – Ask people why they park here:

• Shopping, work, …– Additionalquestions possible:

• Expected parking duration• Opinion about parking problems, parking tariffs, …

3. Execution of the survey• Define what you want to measure. AND WHAT NOT!

– Surveyarea? Surveyperiod? …– More measurements= more work = highercosts!– But too little measurements= unrepairable!

• Clear methodology: – Use standardisedforms: date, hour, name, location, …– What if paper get messed up?

• Practical organisation:– Who stands where, counting what, …? – Starting time, end time? – Reserve people to give people a rest?

• Preparation is crucial !– Workloadfor the surveyors must be realistic !– If needed: short test in advance

Page 62: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

62

4. Analysis of the data– How is current parking behaviour?– Where does it differ from the desired behaviour?– How to force parking behaviour into right

direction?• In general: first optimise use of current capacity

(increase turn-over)• Only then add new parking capacity

– See parking survey in Veliko Tarnovo forpractical example

Page 63: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

63

䆀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䌰䐀. 䄠䍐䎰䎀䎠䏠 䈠䒠䐀䏐䏠䌠䏠䎀䏐䍠. 䇐䎀䎠䏠䎰䌀䎐 䇐䌀䎐䍀䍐䏐䏠䌠

䈰䏐䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䐠䍐䐠 䏰䏠 䌀䐀䑐䎀䐠䍐䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀, 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠 䎀 䌰䍐䏠䍀䍐䍰䎀䓰,䄰䍐䏠䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䍐䏐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䏰䏠 䎀䏐䑀䐀䌀䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䐰䐀䏐䏠 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠

䎀䏐䍠䍐䏐䍐䐀䐐䐠䌠䏠

1. 䉐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䎀䐐䐠䎀䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐠䏠䍀䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰䐠䌀䅰䌀 䑠䍐䎰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌐䍐 䐀䌀䍰䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䍐䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐠䏠䍀䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠

䏐䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䎠䏠 䎠䌀䍰䌀䏐䏠, 䏰䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌀䌠䎰䓰䌠䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠: 䍰䌀 䌠䐐䓰䎠䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䌀䐀䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䍀䍐䑀䎀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍰䏠䏐䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐰䐐䐠䌀䏐䏠䌠䎀 䍐䐐䐠䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠, 䑰䍐䐐䐠䏠䐠䌀䐠䌀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏀䐰. 䇰䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䍐䍀䎀䏐 䎀䎰䎀 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䏐䌀 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䏰䒠䐠䎀, 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏠䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䎀 䏰䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䌀䐀䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 䏠䌐䑐䏠䍠䍀䌀䐠 䏰䍐䒀䌀. 䇰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰 䐀䌀䍰䏰䏠䍰䏐䌀䌠䌀 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀 䎀 䍰䌀䏰䎀䐐䌠䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀. 䄀䎠䏠 䍐 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠, 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏐䌀䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀 䐀䌀䍰䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 (䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䍐䏐, 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐 䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐, 䐐䎰䐰䍠䍐䌐䍐䏐 䌀䌐䏠䏐䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠) 䈐䒠䒐䏠 䐠䌀䎠䌀, 䌰䐀䍐䒀䏐䏠 䎀/䎀䎰䎀 䏐䍐䍰䌀䎠䏠䏐䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀, 䏀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀䐠 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䏠.䇰䏠䐐䎰䍐, 䐐䎰䍐䍀 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰 䏐䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䎀, 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䍀䒠䎰䌰䏠 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠 䍐 䌐䎀䎰䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠, 䎠䌀䎠䒠䌠 䌐䐀䏠䎐 䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䐐䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䒠䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䎰䎀 䏠䐠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠.

䇀䍐䐠䏠䍀䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰䐠䌀 䍐 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䓰䒐䌀 䍰䌀 䐐䒠䌐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰:

• 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠; • 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐰䎰䎀䑠䌀䐠䌀• 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐;• 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䏐䌀 䑠䎀䎠䒠䎰䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐• 䏠䌐䒐䎀䓰䐠 䌐䐀䏠䎐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䌠 䍐䍀䎀䏐 䐀䌀䎐䏠䏐 䏰䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐

䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏀䍐䐀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠,• 䏰䐀䏠䏀䓰䏐䌀 䎀 䎰䏠䎠䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀

Page 64: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

64

• 䐰䏀䍐䐐䐠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀. 䉰䐀䍐䍰 䏀䍐䐠䏠䍀䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏐䌀䏰䐀䌀䌠䓰䐠 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀

䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀 䍰䌀:• 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐠䏠 䏰䏠

䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰;• 䎠䌀䎠 䐐䍐 䍀䌠䎀䍠䎀 䐠䐀䍐䏐䍀䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䍀䍐䏐䓰;• 䎠䌀䐀䐠䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰;• 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䒠䏠䐀䒠䍠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䒐䎀

䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠; • 䏰䐀䎀䐀䏠䍀䌀䐠䌀, 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䎀 䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐䐠䌀 䏐䌀

䏐䍐䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰䎀• 䏠䏰䍐䍀䍐䎰䓰䏐䍐 䎀䎰䎀 䐐䏀䓰䏐䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䎀 䌠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍰䏠䏐䌀䐠䌀;• 䇰䏠䍀䌰䏠䐠䏠䌠䎠䌀 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䍐䎠䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䌠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎀䎰䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌰䎰䍐䍀 䏐䌀

䐐䒠䒐䌀䐐䐠䌠䐰䌠䌀䒐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰.

2. 䇠䏰䎀䐐䌀䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐠䏠䍀䏠䎰䏠䌰䎀䓰䐠䌀

2.1 䇠䌐䑐䌠䌀䐠 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠䅰䌀 䄠䍐䎰䎀䎠䏠 䈠䒠䐀䏐䏠䌠䏠, 䑠䍐䎰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䌐䍐䒀䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐

䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌀䐠䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠, 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䒐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䏀䏐䏠 䌀䍀䏀䎀䏐䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䏠䌐䐀䌀䍰䏠䌠䌀䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䌐䎀䍰䏐䍐䐐䌀, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䍀䍐䏐䓰 䐐䍐 䐐䐠䐀䐰䏰䌠䌀䐠 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀 䌐䐀䏠䎐 䏰䐀䎀䑐䏠䍀䓰䒐䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎀, 䌠 䐀䌀䏀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䏐䎀䓰 䍀䍐䏐 䎀 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䎀䓰 䌀䐀䍐䌀䎰 䏐䌀 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䑀䎀䐀䏀䌀 „䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰䎀 䎀 䌰䌀䐀䌀䍠䎀”. 䇠䐠 䐠䐰䎠 䐐䍐 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䎀 䎀 䏠䌐䑐䌠䌀䐠䌀, 䏰䏠䎠䌀䍰䌀䏐 䏐䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀:

Page 65: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

65

䇰䏠 䏰䐀䎀䏐䑠䎀䏰, 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䐀䒠䑰䌠䌀䐠 䐠䌀䎠䎀䌠䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䎀 䑠䍐䎰䎀 䎀 䐐䒠䏠䐠䌠䍐䐠䏐䏠 䏠䌐䑐䌠䌀䐠 - 䍐䍀䎀䏐 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䍐䏐 䎠䌠䌀䐀䐠䌀䎰, 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䎀䎰䎀 䌐䎀䍰䏐䍐䐐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀, 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐 䏰䌀䎠䎀䏐䌰, 䌰䌀䐀䏠䌠䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䐐䐠䌠䌀, 䏰䐀䏠䍐䎠䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌐䒠䍀䍐䒐䎀 „䐐䎀䏐䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀” 䐠䐰䐀䎀䐐䐠䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀, 䏀䌀䐐䏠䌠䏠 䏰䏠䐐䍐䒐䌀䌠䌀䏐䎀 (䉠䌀䐀䍐䌠䍐䑠). 䈀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䓰䒐䎀 䍰䌀 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䏠䌠䍐, 䎠䏠䌰䌀䐠䏠 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䍰䍐䏀䌀 䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䍰䌀 䐐䏀䓰䏐䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䐰䏰䌀 䏠䐠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 – 䏠䐠 䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䍀䌀 䏰䐀䍐䏀䎀䏐䌀䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䏠 䎀䎰䎀 䏠䌐䐀䌀䐠䏐䏠䐠䏠.

2.2. 䆠䌀䐀䐠䏐䌀 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀䅰䌀䍀䒠䎰䍠䍐䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䍐 䏠䐐䎀䌰䐰䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䍀䑐䏠䍀䓰䒐䌀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䏐䌀 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀,

䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䒐䍐 䏰䏠䐐䎰䐰䍠䎀 䍰䌀 䏐䌀䏐䌀䐐䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䓰䎠䏠 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠, 䏐䍐䌰䏠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏐䌀䎐-䌠䌀䍠䏐䏠䐠䏠: 䍀䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰 䏐䌀 䌰䏠 䎀䍀䍐䏐䐠䎀䑀䎀䑠䎀䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠. 䄠 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌀䓰 䍐 䐰䍀䏠䌐䏐䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀 䎠䌀䍀䌀䐐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䏰䎰䌀䏐 䏐䌀 䄠. 䈠䒠䐀䏐䏠䌠䏠 䌠 䏀䌀䒐䌀䌐 1:1000 䌠 䑠䎀䑀䐀䏠䌠 䌠䎀䍀. 䇐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䌀 䍐 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䌀 䏠䌐䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䎠䌀, 䍰䌀 䍀䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䌀䐀䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䐀䍐 䏠䏰䎀䐐䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐀䎀䎀:

• 䈀䌀䍰䌰䐀䌀䌠䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎰䎀䐐䐠䌀 䐐 䎠䐀䎀䐠䍐䐀䎀䎀: 䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䐠 䄀4 (䐰䍀䏠䌐䍐䏐 䍰䌀 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏠䐠 䌠䒠䐀䌠䓰䒐 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰, 䇀 1:000

Page 66: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

66

• 䈰䍀䍐䌐䍐䎰䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀䏀䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐰䎰䎀䑠䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䎠䏠䏰䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐, 䐠䌀䎠䌀 䑰䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䎀䍠䍀䌀䐠 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䍐䎠䎀 䎰䎀䐐䐠 䄀4,

• 䇰䐀䍐䏀䌀䑐䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䎀䍰䎰䎀䒀䏐䎀 䍐䎰䍐䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀, 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䏀䏠䐠䎀, 䑐䏠䐀䎀䍰䏠䏐䐠䌀䎰䎀, 䏐䌀䍀䏰䎀䐐䎀 䎀 䍀䐀䐰䌰䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䍰䌀䐠䐀䐰䍀䏐䓰䌠䌀 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䓰;

• 䅰䌀䏰䌀䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䏠䏰䏠䌰䐀䌀䑀䐐䎠䎀 䍐䎰䍐䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀, 䏰䏠䏀䌀䌰䌀䒐䎀 䏐䌀 䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠䍐䎰䓰 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䐀䎀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀 䏐䌀 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠, 䎠䌀䐠䏠: 䒀䌀䑐䐠䎀, 䍀䒠䐀䌠䍐䐠䌀, 䍐䎰䍐䎠䐠䐀䎀䑰䍐䐐䎠䎀 䐐䐠䒠䎰䌐䏠䌠䍐, 䐰䎰䎀䑰䏐䏠 䏠䐐䌠䍐䐠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐.

• 䇠䑠䌠䍐䐠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏐䌀䍀䏰䎀䐐䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䐐䌰䐀䌀䍀䎀: 䐐䒠䍀, 䐠䍐䌀䐠䒠䐀, 䏠䌐䒐䎀䏐䌀, 䌰䌀䎰䍐䐀䎀䓰, 䌐䎀䍰䏐䍐䐐 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀, 䏰䌀䏀䍐䐠䏐䎀䎠, 䌐䏠䎰䎀䏐䎀䑠䌀, 䍰䌀䌠䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䏠䌐䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠 䑐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䍐 䎀 䍀䐀.

• 䅰䏐䌀䎠 䍰䌀 䐐䍐䌠䍐䐀䇐䌀䏐䌀䐐䓰䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䌠䒠䐀䒀䌠䌀, 䑰䐀䍐䍰

䏠䌐䑐䏠䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀, 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌠䌀䐠 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䎰䍐䐠䎠䎀䐠䍐, 䏐䌀䑰䎀䏐䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 (䐰䐐䏰䍐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠, 䏐䌀䏰䐀䍐䑰䏐䏠 䎀䎰䎀 䐀䎀䌐䍐䏐䌀 䎠䏠䐐䐠) 䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 (䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䍐䏐, 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐 䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐, 䐐䎰䐰䍠䍐䌐䍐䏐 䌀䌐䏠䏐䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠), 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䍰䌀䌐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䏠, 䏐䏠 䐐䌀 䐐䏰䐀䍐䎰䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀.

䇐䏠䏀䍐䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䌠䒠䐀䒀䎀 䌐䒠䐀䍰䏠 䎀 䎰䍐䐐䏐䏠 䐐 䏰䏠䏀䏠䒐䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䏐䐐䐠䐀䐰䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䎀 䌠 䄰䆀䈐, 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䎀 䑰䎀䐠䌀䍐䏀䏠䐐䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀 䌠 䎠䎰䍐䐠䎠䌀䐠䌀 䎀 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏠䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀.

2.3. 䇠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䌠䎀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰 䎀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀䇰䎰䌀䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀䐠䍐 䍐 䍐䍀䏐䌀 䏠䐠 䏐䌀䎐-䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎀

䐠䐀䐰䍀䏠䍐䏀䎠䎀 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䎀 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀䒐䎀 䏠䏰䎀䐠. 䄠䌀䍠䍐䏐 䏰䌀䐀䌀䏀䍐䐠䒠䐀 䍐 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䎠䌀䎠䒠䌠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䌠䎀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰 䏠䐠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䒐䍐 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䌠䒠䐀䒀䌠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 (15 䏀䎀䏐., ½ 䑰䌀䐐, 1 䑰䌀䐐 䎀 䐠.䏐.). 䄠䐀䍐䏀䍐䌠䎀䓰 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰 䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀 䏠䐠 䑠䍐䎰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠. 䅰䌀 䏰䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䏠-䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䏰䏠䐀䒠䑰䌠䌀 䐠䏠䎐 䍀䌀 䍐 䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠 䏠䐠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀䓰 (䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀䓰) 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䌀䐠䌀.

䇰䐀䍐䍀䏰䏠䎰䌀䌰䌀 䐐䍐, 䑰䍐 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䑰䎀䐐䎰䎀 䌠䒠䍰 䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 (䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䐰䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䍠䎀䎰䎀䒐䌀, 䎀 䐠.䏐.) 䎀䎰䎀 䏠䐠 䏰䏠-䐀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䎀䍰䏀䍐䐀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰. 䆀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 [Haringsma, 1988] 䏰䏠䎠䌀䍰䌠䌀, 䑰䍐 䌠䐀䒠䍰䎠䌀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䎀䍰䌐䐀䌀䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀

Page 67: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

67

䏐䌀䌐䎰䓠䍀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰 䏠䐠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐, 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䏐䐠䌀 䏐䌀 "䏰䐀䏠䏰䐰䐐䎠䌀". 䆠䏠䌰䌀䐠䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䌠䎀䓰 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰 䍰䌀 䏐䌀䌐䎰䓠䍀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䍐 䐀䌀䌠䍐䏐 䏐䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠 (䐀䍐䌀䎰䏐䏠) 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䌠 䐐䒠䏠䐠䏐䏠䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 1:1, 䏰䐀䎀䌐䎰䎀䍰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 37% 䏀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䌐䒠䍀䌀䐠 䏰䐀䏠䏰䐰䐐䏐䌀䐠䎀. 䆠䏠䌰䌀䐠䏠 䌠䐀䒠䍰䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䏰䐀䎀䍐䐠䎀䓰 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰 䎀 䍀䍐䎐䐐䐠䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䍐 1:2, 䐠䏠 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䏐䐠䌀 䍐 䏰䐀䎀䌐䎰䎀䍰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 21%. 䄀䎠䏠 䐐䍐 䐐䐠䐀䍐䏀䎀䏀 䎠䒠䏀 䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䏐䐠 䏰䏠䍀 10% 䐠䏠 䐐䒠䏠䐠䏐䏠䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䍐 1:5.

䅐䐐䐠䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠, 䏐䌀䎐 䍀䏠䌐䐀䎀䓰 䌠䌀䐀䎀䌀䏐䐠 䍐, 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌠䌀 䏐䍐䏰䐀䍐䎠䒠䐐䏐䌀䐠䏠, 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀 䌠䐐䓰䎠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䎠䌀 䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䌀䐠䌀 䏐䍐䏠䌐䏠䐐䏐䏠䌠䌀䏐䏠 䐐䎠䒠䏰䌀. 䄠 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䏰䏠䐀䌀䍀䎀 䑀䎀䏐䌀䐐䏠䌠䎀 䏠䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑰䍐䏐䎀䓰 䎀 䑀䌀䎠䐠䌀, 䑰䍐 䍀䍐䎰䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䌀䍀䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䌐䎀䎰䍐䐠䎀 䍰䌀 䍐䍀䏐䏠䑰䌀䐐䏠䌠 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䍐 䏐䌀䎐-䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀, 䎀䍰䌐䐀䌀䑐䏀䍐 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䌠䒠䒀䌠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 1 䑰䌀䐐.

䇰䏠 䏰䐀䍐䏰䏠䐀䒠䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䎰䍐䌰䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 䐰䏐䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀 䌠 䄰䍐䏐䐠, 䄐䍐䎰䌰䎀䓰, 䍀䍐䏰䌀䐀䐠䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠 䏰䏠 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠, 䏐䏠䐀䏀䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏠䌐䑐䏠䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 䍰䌀 1 䑰䌀䐐 䍐 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏠 1 䎠䏀. 䇰䏠䐀䌀䍀䎀 䍀䍐䎰䏠䎠䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐, 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀 䍀䍐䏐䎀䌠䍐䎰䌀䑠䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀 䎀 䏐䍐䏠䏰䎀䐠䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 (䎠䌀䎠䐠䏠 䎀 䐠䌀䍰䎀 䏐䌀 䐀䒠䎠䏠䌠䏠䍀䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䏐䎀 䍰䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠), 䐀䍐䒀䎀䑐䏀䍐 䍀䌀 䏐䍐 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䍐䏀䌀䐠 䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀 䐀䎀䐐䎠䏠䌠䍐 䎀 䐐䎠䒠䐐䎀䑐䏀䍐 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀䐠䍐 䍀䏠 500 – 750 䏀. 䈠䌀䎠䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䑀䏠䐀䏀䎀䑐䌀 12 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䌀 䐐 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䐐䐠䍐䏰䍐䏐 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䐰䍀䏐䏠䐐䐠 (䏰䏠-䍀䒠䎰䌰䎀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀 䎀䎰䎀 䏰䏠-䎀䏐䐠䍐䏐䍰䎀䌠䏐䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀). 䄀䎠䏠 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀 䐐䌀 䎠䏠䏀䏰䌀䎠䐠䏐䎀, 䏐䌀䏰䐀䎀䏀䍐䐀, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䐐 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䐀䍐䍀䌀, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏠䐠 䍀䌠䍐䐠䍐 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏐䌀 䐰䎰䎀䑠䌀䐠䌀, 䎀䎰䎀 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䍀䒠䎰䌰䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀 䏰䏠 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐰䎰䎀䑠䌀, 䐠䏠 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䒠䌠䍐䍀䌀䐠 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐐䍐䎠䑠䎀䎀, 䍰䌀 䏰䏠-䎰䍐䐐䏐䏠 䏠䐀䎀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰. 䇐䌀䏰䐀䎀䏀䍐䐀, 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 10, 䐐䍐䎠䑠䎀䓰 1, 䐐䍐䎠䑠䎀䓰 2 䎀 䐠.䏐.

䅰䌀 䌠䐐䍐䎠䎀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䌰䏠䐠䌠䎀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀 䎀 䑀䏠䐀䏀䐰䎰䓰䐀 䍰䌀 䏰䏠䏰䒠䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐

Page 68: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

68

䇐䌀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏠䐠䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌀䏐䎀 䐠䏠䑰䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀, 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏀, 䎠䌀䎠䐠䏠 䎀 䐠䏠䑰䏐䎀䓰 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 (䐐 䍀䍐䌐䍐䎰䌀 䎰䎀䏐䎀䓰, 䐐䐠䐀䍐䎰䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䏠䐐䏠䎠䌀, 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠 䎀 䎠䐀䌀䎐), 䎠䏠䎐䐠䏠 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䏀䎀䏐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰 䍰䌀 1 䑰䌀䐐.

䄠䒠䌠 䑀䏠䐀䏀䐰䎰䓰䐀䌀, 䍀䌀䍀䍐䏐 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䍐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰, 䎀䏀䌀 䎀䏀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐰䎰䎀䑠䌀䐠䌀, 䎀䍀䍐䏐䐠䎀䑀䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠, 䎠䏠䎐䐠䏠 䏐䌀䎐-䍀䏠䌐䐀䍐 䍐 䍀䌀 䌐䒠䍀䍐 䐰䏐䎀䎠䌀䎰䍐䏐 䍰䌀 䏐䌀䐐䍐䎰䍐䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠, 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䑰䌀䐐 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䍐䎠䎀 䑠䎀䎠䒠䎰 䎀 䏰䐀䌀䍰䏐䌀 䎠䎰䍐䐠䎠䌀, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰 䏰䏠䏰䒠䎰䌠䌀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠.

Page 69: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

69

䇰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䎠䌀䎠䐠䏠 䎀 䍀䍐䏐䓰, 䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀 䏠䐠 䎠䏠䏐䎠䐀䍐䐠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䑠䍐䎰. 䇐䌀䏰䐀䎀䏀䍐䐀 䍰䌀 䐠䒠䐀䌰䏠䌠䐐䎠䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䒠䐀 䍐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䌀䐠䒠䑰䏐䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䏠䌠䍐䍀䍐 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 15 䎀 18 䑰䌀䐐䌀, 䏐䏠 䎀 䌠 䏰䍐䐠䒠䎠 䎀 䌠 䐐䒠䌐䏠䐠䌀, 䏐䏠 䐐䐀䌀䐠䒠䎠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䌠䎀 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰 (15.䏀䎀䏐). 䄠 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌀䓰 䏐䌀 䐠䌀䍰䎀 䏰䏠䐀䒠䑰䎠䌀 䎀 䌠 䐠䏠䍰䎀 䏠䌐䑐䌠䌀䐠 䍐 䐰䍀䌀䑰䏐䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䌐䍐䐀䍐 䏐䏠䐀䏀䌀䎰䍐䏐 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䍐䏐 䍀䍐䏐, 䏐䌀䏰䐀䎀䏀䍐䐀 䌠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䍐䍀䏀䎀䑠䌀䐠䌀. 䅰䌀 䏰䏠䎰䐰䑰䎀䏀 䍀䏠䐐䐠䏠䌠䍐䐀䏐䎀 䎀 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䎀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀 䌐䍐䒀䍐 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䌠䌀䍠䏐䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䍰䌀䏰䏠䑰䏐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䏐䎀䓰 䍀䍐䏐 䎀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䍰䌀䌠䒠䐀䒀䎀 䌠 䎠䐀䌀䓰䐠 䏀䐰. 䅐䐐䐠䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䏠 䌐䎀 䌐䎀䎰䏠 䍀䏠䌐䐀䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀 䎀 䌠䒠䌠 䌠䍐䑰䍐䐀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䑰䌀䐐䏠䌠䍐, 䎠䏠䌰䌀䐠䏠 䎀䍀䌠䌀 䌠䐠䏠䐀䌀 䌠䒠䎰䏐䌀 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䎀䑐䏠䍀䓰䒐䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎀 䐐 䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀 䑠䍐䎰䎀 (䏰䌀䍰䌀䐀䐰䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䍰䌀䌠䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀䓰, 䎠䎀䏐䌀 䎀 䐠䍐䌀䐠䐀䎀). 䄠 䐐䎰䐰䑰䌀䓰, 䏰䏠䐀䌀䍀䎀 䏠䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑰䍐䏐䎀 䐀䍐䐐䐰䐀䐐䎀, 䐠䌀䍰䎀 䌰䐀䐰䏰䌀 䒐䍐 䏠䐠䏰䌀䍀䏐䍐 䏠䐠 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀.

䆀䍰䑰䍐䐀䐠䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䍐 䏠䐠 䏠䐐䏠䌐䍐䏐䌀 䌠䌀䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠, 䍰䌀䒐䏠䐠䏠 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀 䌀䌠䐠䏠䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䎀 䎀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌠䌀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠.

䆠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐐䍐 䎠䎰䌀䐐䎀䑀䎀䑠䎀䐀䌀䐠䌀

䐠䌀䎠䌀:

• 䌐䍐䍰䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 - 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀, 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀 䌐䍐䍰 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䍰䌀䏰䎰䌀䒐䌀

• 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 - 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䐐 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䐠䌀䎰䏠䏐䎀, 䌐䎀䎰䍐䐠䎀 䎀䎰䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐠䐀䎀

• 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䎀䐠䍐䍠䌀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䏐䌀 䐀䌀䍰䐀䍐䒀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䏰䎀䐀䌀䐠 䏐䌀 䐠䓰䑐 (䐐䎰䐰䍠䍐䌐䍐䏐 䌀䌐䏠䏐䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠)

• 䍰䌀䏰䌀䍰䍐䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏠䌐䏠䍰䏐䌀䑰䏐䎀 䐐䒠䐐 䍰䏐䌀䑠䎀, 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䓰䐐䏐䏠 䍐 䏰䏠䐐䏠䑰䍐䏐䏠 䎠䏠䎀 䐐䌀 䐀䍐䍰䍐䐀䌠䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䎀 䍰䌀 䎠䏠䎀 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䎀 - 䐠䌀䎠䐐䎀䐠䌀, 䎰䍐䎠䌀䐀䎀, 䑐䏠䐀䌀 䐐 䐰䌠䐀䍐䍠䍀䌀䏐䎀䓰 䎀䎰䎀 䍰䌀 䐠䏠䌠䌀䐀䍐䏐䍐/ 䐀䌀䍰䐠䏠䌠䌀䐀䌠䌀䏐䍐.

• 䍰䌀䌐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏠䌐䏠䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀 䐐䒠䐐 䐐䒠䏠䐠䌠䍐䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䏐䌀䑠䎀 䎀䎰䎀 䐰䎰䎀䑰䏐䌀 䏀䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䏠䌠䎠䌀

• 䏐䍐䐀䍐䌰䎰䌀䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 – 䐠䌀䎠䎀䌠䌀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏐䍐 䐐䌀 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䌀䎰䏐䏠 䍰䌀䌐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䏐䍐 䐐䌀 䏠䌐䏠䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀, 䏐䏠 䎀䏀䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎀, 䏐䌀䏰䐀䎀䏀䍐䐀: 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎀, 䏠䐠 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐐䌀 䐀䌀䍰䑰䍐䐀䐠䌀䏐䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䎰䍐䐠䎠䎀, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䍀 䌰䌀䐀䌀䍠䏐䎀 䎠䎰䍐䐠䎠䎀, 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䐐䏀䍐䐠䏠䐐䒠䌐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐, 䏰䐀䍐䍀 䌠䑐䏠䍀/䎀䍰䑐䏠䍀, 䌀䌠䐠䏠䌐䐰䐐䏐䎀 䐐䏰䎀䐀䎠䎀, 䏐䌀 䐠䐀䏠䐠䏠䌀䐀䌀, 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䍰䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀 䏰䎰䏠䒐䎀 䎀 䍀䐀.

Page 70: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

70

䅰䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐰䎰䍐䐐䏐䎀 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐, 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䏠䏰䒠䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠䏐䏠䐐䏐䏠 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䍀䌀䎰䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠 䍐 䐐䏰䐀䓰䎰䏠 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䌐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䏠/䏐䍐䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䎰䏐䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䐐䌀 䐐䏰䍐䐐䐠䍐䏐䎀. 䅰䌀䐠䏠䌠䌀 䏠䒐䍐 䏰䐀䎀 䐀䌀䍰䑰䍐䐀䐠䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀, 䐠䍐 䐐䌀 䎠䎰䌀䐐䎀䑀䎀䑠䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏰䏠 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰, 䌠 䑠䎀䑀䐀䏠䌠䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䌀, 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䐐䌀 䏐䌀䑰䍐䐀䐠䌀䏐䎀, 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䎀 䏠䐠䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌀䏐䎀 䌠䒠䌠 䑀䏠䐀䏀䐰䎰䓰䐀䌀 䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀, 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏐䍐 䌐䎀 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀䎰䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀, 䏐䏠 䌠䒠䏰䐀䍐䎠䎀 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䐠. 䈠䌀䎠䌀, 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰 䏠䐐䐠䌀䌠䌀 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䌀䐠䌀, 䏰䐀䏠䐐䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䍰䌀䏰䎀䒀䍐 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀䓰 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠, 䌐䍐䍰 䍀䌀 䎀䏀䌀 䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䎰䏐䏠 䎰䎀 䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䏠 䎀䎰䎀 䏐䍐. 䇰䏠䐐䎰䍐 䌠 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀䐠䍐 䐠䍐䍰䎀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀 䏀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䍐 䐐䍐 䐐䍐䎰䍐䎠䐠䎀䐀䌀䐠 䐐䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䎀䏀 䎀 䐐䒠䏠䐠䌠䍐䐠䏐䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䍰䎀䏀䌀䐠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䎀䍀 䎀䎰䎀 䏐䍐. 䈐䒠䒐䏠 䐠䌀䎠䌀, 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䎀䍀䎀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰, 䌀䎠䏠 䌠䎀䍀䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䏠 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠 䏐䌀 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䏐䍐 䍐 䏠䐠䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌀䏐䏠 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀, 䍀䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䐠䌐䍐䎰䍐䍠䎀 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䎀 䐐䍐 䐐䍐 䌠䏰䎀䒀䍐 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䌠 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀 䏰䏠 䏐䓰䎠䌀䎠䒠䌠 䐀䍐䍰䍐䐀䌠䍐䏐 䎀䍀䍐䏐䐠䎀䑀䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䍐䏐 䎠䏠䍀.

2.4. 䇰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䈀䌀䏐䏐䎀䓰 䑰䌀䐐 (7.00) 䌐䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐 䍰䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䒠䎠 䎀䏐䐐䐠䐀䐰䎠䐠䌀䍠 䏐䌀

䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀 䏐䌀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䌀 䍰䌀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䐐 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䏠䐠 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 (3-䏀䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌀䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䏐䌀 䐰䏐䎀䌠䍐䐀䐐䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀 䏰䏠 䌀䐀䑐䎀䐠䍐䎠䐠䐰䐀䌀 䐐䐠䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䐐䐠䌠䏠 䎀 䌰䍐䏠䍀䍐䍰䎀䓰 䎀 3-䏀䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌀䌠䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀 䏠䐠 䑀䎀䐀䏀䌀 „䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰䎀 䎀 䌰䌀䐀䌀䍠䎀”). 䇐䌀䎐 - 䐠䐀䐰䍀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䌀 䎀 䐐䒠䒐䍐䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䏐䏐䏠 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䌠䌀䍠䏐䌀 䍰䌀 䎠䌀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀 䍐, 䍀䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰 䍀䌀 „䏰䐀䍐䏐䍐䐐䍐”, 䐀䌀䍰䏰䏠䍰䏐䌀䍐 䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䎰䏐䏠 䎰䏠䎠䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀䑠䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䒠䏠䐠䌠䍐䐠䏠䐠䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䏠䐠 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䐀䍐䌀䎰䏐䎀䓰 䐠䍐䐀䍐䏐 䎀 䐐䒠䏠䐠䌠䍐䐠䏠 䍀䌀 䌰䏠 䌠䏰䎀䒀䍐 䌠䒠䌠 䑀䏠䐀䏀䐰䎰䓰䐀䌀. 䅰䌀䐠䏠䌠䌀 䍐 䏐䍐䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䎀䏀䏠 䎠䐀䌀䐠䎠䏠 䏠䌐䐰䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䎠䌀䎠䌠䎀 䏠䐀䎀䍐䏐䐠䎀䐀䎀 䏠䐠 䎠䌀䐀䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰 (䍐䎰. 䐐䐠䒠䎰䌐䏠䌠䍐, 䏰䏠䐀䍐䍀䍐䏐 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀, 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠 䏐䌀 䎠䐀䒠䐐䐠䏠䌠䎀䒐䍐, 䍐䏀䌐䎰䍐䏀䌀䐠䎀䑰䏐䎀 䐐䌰䐀䌀䍀䎀 䎀 䍀䐀.), 䍀䌀 䏀䐰 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䐐䏠䑰䎀 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䎠䐀䌀䓰 䏐䌀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䌀, 䍀䌀 䏀䐰 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䍀䑰䍐䐀䐠䌀䍐 䌠䌀䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䌀䐠, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䎀䍰䏰䒠䎰䏐䓰䌠䌀 䎀 䑰䌀䐐䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䏰䐀䎀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䐠䌀䐀䐠䎀䐀䌀 䏠䌐䑐䏠䍀䌀.

䇠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䏐䎀䑠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䎀䏀䌀䐠 䍰䌀䍀䌀䑰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䏠䌐䎀䎠䌀䎰䓰䐠 䏰䏠 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀, 䍀䌀 䐀䌀䍰䓰䐐䏐䓰䌠䌀䐠 䏀䌀䐠䍐䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䎀 䍀䌀 䎠䏠䏐䐠䐀䏠䎰䎀䐀䌀䐠

Page 71: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

71

䏰䐀䏠䑠䍐䐐䌀. 䈐䎰䍐䍀 䏰䐀䎀䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䏠䐠䌰䏠䌠䏠䐀䏐䎀䎠䌀 䐐䒠䌐䎀䐀䌀 䏀䌀䐠䍐䐀䎀䌀䎰䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 䌠䐐䍐䎠䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰 䎀 䏠䌐䐐䒠䍠䍀䌀 䍰䌀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䏐䌀䏐䍐䐐䍐䏐䎀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䎀䎰䎀 䌠䒠䍰䏐䎀䎠䏐䌀䎰䎀 䌠䒠䏰䐀䐐䎀.

2.5. 䇠䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑰䍐䏐䎀䓰 • 䆠䌀䐠䏠 䑠䓰䎰䏠, 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䐠䌀䎠䏠䌠䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀䍰䎀䐐䎠䌠䌀 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䐀䍐䐐䐰䐀䐐䎀

䍰䌀 䏰䏠䍀䌰䏠䐠䏠䌠䎠䌀, 䎀䍰䏰䒠䎰䏐䍐䏐䎀䍐 䎀 䏠䌐䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀䐠䍐.• 䆀䏐䐠䍐䐀䌠䌀䎰䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠, 䏠䌐䑐䏠䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䎀䏐

䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 䍰䌀 1 䑰䌀䐐 䍐 䎠䏠䏀䏰䐀䏠䏀䎀䐐䍐䏐, 䐠䒠䎐 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏐䍐䐠䏠䑰䏐䎀. 䇰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䐠 䎀 䐐䎀 䐠䐀䒠䌰䌠䌀䐠 䌠 䐀䌀䏀䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐, 䎀䏀䌀 䏠䏰䌀䐐䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍀䌀 䌐䒠䍀䌀䐠 䏰䐀䏠䏰䐰䐐䏐䌀䐠䎀 䏠䐠 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䎀䐠䍐䎰䓰, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䌠䏠䍀䎀 䍀䏠 䏰䏠䍀䑠䍐䏐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䌀 䎀 䏐䌀䍀䑠䍐䏐䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐䐠䏠

3. 䄀䇐䄀䆰䆀䅰 䇐䄀 䈀䅐䅰䈰䆰䈠䄀䈠䆀䈠䅐䈐䎰䍐䍀 䐐䒠䌐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌀䏐䎠䍐䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎠䌀䐀䐠䎀 䍰䌀䏰䏠䑰䌠䌀 䏠䌐䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䎠䌀 䏐䌀

䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀䐠䍐. 䅰䌀 䑠䍐䎰䐠䌀 䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐 䐐䏰䍐䑠䎀䌀䎰䎀䍰䎀䐀䌀䏐 䐐䏠䑀䐠䐰䍐䐀 Parcero, 䏐䌀 䑐䏠䎰䌀䏐䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䑀䎀䐀䏀䌀 Trenso. 䇰䏠䍀䌰䏠䐠䌠䓰 䐐䍐 䌠䑐䏠䍀䍐䏐 䐠䍐䎠䐐䐠䏠䌠䎀 䑀䌀䎐䎰 䐐 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䐐䒠䌐䐀䌀䏐䌀 䏠䐠 䌀䏐䎠䍐䐠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎠䌀䐀䐠䎀. 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䎠䌀䍰䌀 䏐䌀䎐-䐠䐀䐰䍀䏠䍐䏀䎠䌀䐠䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠 - 䐀䒠䑰䏐䏠 䏐䌀䌐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䍰䌀䏰䎀䐐䌀䏐䎀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䏠䏐䏐䎀 䏐䏠䏀䍐䐀䌀, 䏠䏰䐀䌀䌠䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䍐䒀䎠䎀 䏠䐠 䏐䍐䏰䐀䌀䌠䎀䎰䏐䏠 䏰䏠䏰䒠䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䐐䏀䓰䏐䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠 䎀 䐠.䏐.

䇰䐀䏠䌰䐀䌀䏀䌀䐠䌀 䎀䏀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍀䌀 䌰䍐䏐䍐䐀䎀䐀䌀 䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䎀 䎀 䐠䌀䌐䎰䎀䑠䎀 䐐 䏠䌐䏠䌐䒐䍐䏐䎀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䎀䏀䌀 䌠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏐䌀䏰䐀䓰䌠䌀䓰 䎀䍰䌠䏠䍀䎀 䏠䐠䏐䏠䐐䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀 䎀 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍰䏠䏐䌀䐠䌀:

Page 72: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

72

3.1 䇰䄀䈀䆠䆀䇐䄰 䆠䄀䇰䄀䉠䆀䈠䅐䈠

䆠䌀䐀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰 䐐䒠䐐 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䏠䏐䎀/䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠:

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀

䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰

䇐䏠䏀䍐䐀 䏐䌀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䍰䌀䌐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䎀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 Grand total

1 65 3 682 67 673 97 1 984 96 7 1035 88 886 91 14 1057 77 5 828 11 134 1459 62 6 76 144

10 23 52 7511 79 6 26 11112 18 1 91 110

Grand Total

774 16 406 1196

Page 73: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

73

䆀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍰䏠䏐䌀 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀 1180 䎰䍐䌰䌀䎰䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀16 䍰䌀䌐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䎀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䌐䓰䑐䌀 䑰䍐䐐䐠䏠 䍰䌀䍐䐠䎀 䏰䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌐䐀䏠䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠.

䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䓰䇐䏠䏀䍐䐀 䏐䌀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䍰䌀䌐䐀䌀䏐䍐䏐䎀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 Grand Total

1 96% 4% 0% 100%2 100% 0% 0% 100%3 99% 0% 1% 100%4 93% 0% 7% 100%5 100% 0% 0% 100%6 87% 0% 13% 100%7 94% 0% 6% 100%8 8% 0% 92% 100%9 43% 4% 53% 100%

10 31% 0% 69% 100%11 71% 5% 23% 100%12 16% 1% 83% 100%

Grand Total 65% 1% 34% 100%

䆠䌀䐠䏠 䏠䌐䒐䏠, 䍀䌠䍐 䐠䐀䍐䐠䎀 䏠䐠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀 䌠 䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑠䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰 䐐䌀 䌐䍐䍰䏰䎰䌀䐠䏐䎀, 䌀 䍐䍀䏐䌀 䐠䐀䍐䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀. 䅰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 1 䍀䏠 7, 䏐䌀䎐-䌠䍐䑰䍐, 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀䐠 䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䌐䍐䍰 䏐䎀䎠䌀䎠䌠䎀 䐀䍐䐐䐠䐀䎀䎠䑠䎀䎀. 䅰䏠䏐䌀 8 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䌠䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎀䏀䏐䏠 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀, 䌀 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 9 䍀䏠 12 䐐䒠䍀䒠䐀䍠䌀䐠 䐐䏀䍐䐐䍐䏐䎀 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䎀 - 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀.

Page 74: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

74

䆠䌀䐀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀 䏰䏠 䍰䏠䏐䎀

䆠䌀䐀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䌠䎀䍀䏠䌠䍐䐠䍐 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀

Page 75: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

75

4. 䇰䄀䈀䆠䆀䇐䄰 䇰䇠䄠䅐䅀䅐䇐䆀䅐

4.1. 䅰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䆠䌀䐠䏠 䑠䓰䎰䏠, 䍰䌀 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䍰䏠䏐䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䍰䌀 䑠䍐䎰䎀䓰 䏰䍐䐀䏠䎀䍀 䏐䌀

䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䏀䌀䎰䎠䏠 䏐䌀䍀 䏐䍐䌰䏠, 78% 䏠䐠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䍰䌀䍐䐠䎀. 䄠䒠䏰䐀䍐䎠䎀, 䑰䍐 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䍐 䏰䏠䍀 䏰䐀䎀䍐䐠䎀䓰 䏰䐀䌀䌰 䏠䐠 85%, 䐠䌀䍰䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀 䐐䐠䏠䎐䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍐 䏰䏠-䐐䎠䏠䐀䏠 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䌀 䎀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䍀䏠䏰䐰䐐䏐䍐, 䑰䍐 䍰䌀 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀 䏀䏠䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀 䎀 䍰䌀 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀 䐠䏠䍰䎀 䏰䐀䌀䌰 䒐䍐 䌐䒠䍀䍐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䎠䏠䑰䍐䏐.

Average occupation (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Study area - total Study area - free places Study area - payed places

䅰䌀䌐䍐䎰䍐䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䎀䍰䌠䏠䍀 䏠䐠 䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀䐠䌀 䍐, 䑰䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䍰䎰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍐 䏰䏠䑰䐠䎀 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䎀 䐐䒠䒐䏠. 䅰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍐 䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䎠䌀 (73%), 䏠䐠 䐠䌀䍰䎀 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 (79%), 䏐䏠 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䍐 䐠䏠䎰䎠䏠䌠䌀 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀, 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠䐠䏠 䌐䎀 䏀䏠䌰䎰䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀.

Page 76: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

76

Average occupation (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

route 1 route 2 route 3 route 4 route 5 route 6 route 7 route 8 route 9 route 10 route 11 route 12

䇐䌀䌐䎰䓠䍀䌀䌠䌀䎐䎠䎀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䏠䏐䎀, 䐐䍐 䍰䌀䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌠䌀䐠 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䎰䏠䎠䌀䎰䏐䎀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䎀. 䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍐 䏐䌀䎐-䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䌀 䏰䐀䎀 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 䎀 11, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䑠䍐䎰䎀䓰 䍀䍐䏐 䍐 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏠 80%, 䎀䎰䎀 䏰䏠-䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䌀. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 6 䎀 9 䐐䍐 䏰䐀䏠䓰䌠䓰䌠䌀䐠 䏐䌀䎐-䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀 䐐 䍀䏐䍐䌠䏐䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠 䏠䐠 85%.

K䌀䐀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏰䏠 䍰䏠䏐䎀

Page 77: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

77

Average occupation (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Route 9 10 11 Total Route 9 10 11 Free Route 9 10 11 Payed

䅐䑀䍐䎠䐠䒠䐠 䏠䐠 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍐 䏐䌀䎐-䌠䎀䍀䎀䏀 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 9,10 䎀 11, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䒀䏠䑀䓀䏠䐀䎀䐠䍐 䎀䏀䌀䐠 䎀䍰䌐䏠䐀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐. 䆀 䐠䌀䎠䌀, 䎀䏀䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䌀 䌠 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䍀䌠䍐䐠䍐 䎠䌀䐠䍐䌰䏠䐀䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀, 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀, 䏐䏠 䏐䍐 䍐 䐠䏠䎰䎠䏠䌠䌀 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀, 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀䒀䍐. 䇀䌀䎠䌀䐀, 䑰䍐 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍀䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䏐䍐 䍐 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䌀䐠䎀䑰䏐䌀 (83%), 䐠䏠 66% 䏠䐠 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䍰䌀䍐䐠䎀.

4.2. 䅰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠 䌠 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䍀䍐䏐䓰䇰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䍀䍐䐠䌀䎐䎰䎀 䏀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䎰䐰䑰䌀䐠, 䌀䎠䏠 䐐䍐 䌠䎠䎰䓠䑰䌀䐠 䑰䌀䐐䏠䌠䎀䐠䍐

䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䎀 䌠 䏠䌐䐀䌀䌐䏠䐠䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䐀䍐䍰䐰䎰䐠䌀䐠䎀䐠䍐.

Rou

te/h

8-9

9-10

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

13-1

4

14-1

5

15-1

6

16-1

7

1718

Tota

l

1 60% 74% 85% 83% 85% 65% 69% 80% 85%72% 76%2 76% 78% 73% 84% 76% 73% 84% 72% 69%81% 76%3 66% 73% 90% 89% 85% 87% 86% 78% 85%76% 81%4 66% 72% 65% 64% 67% 68% 64% 67% 66%67% 67%5 59% 82% 82% 89% 82% 81% 73% 78% 88%85% 80%6 70% 85% 90% 90% 86% 89% 91% 87% 90%78% 85%7 59% 82% 73% 78% 77% 82% 78% 82% 74%62% 75%8 33% 67% 83% 91% 93% 96% 92% 88% 86%78% 81%

Page 78: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

78

9 67% 88% 93% 93% 89% 87% 83% 83% 86%77% 85%10 51% 57% 65% 56% 77% 71% 69% 68% 63%56% 63%11 70% 70% 73% 79% 84% 83% 84% 87% 81%81% 79%12 51% 67% 78% 83% 84% 87% 76% 77% 81%78% 76%

total 60% 75% 80% 83% 83% 82% 80% 80% 80%75% 78%

䇰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䐐䌀 䌠 䏐䌀䎐-䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䍰䏠䏐䎀 3, 6, 8 䎀 9, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䍀䏠䏰䐰䐐䐠䎀䏀䎀䓰 䎰䎀䏀䎀䐠 䏠䐠 85% 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠, 䍐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䎠䏠䑰䍐䏐 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䑠䍐䎰䎀䓰 䍀䍐䏐. 䈐䒠䒐䏠, 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 5, 11 䎀 12, 䍰䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍐 䌐䎰䎀䍰䎠䌀 䍀䏠 䎰䎀䏀䎀䐠䌀, 䌀 䏰䏠䏐䓰䎠䏠䌰䌀 䌰䏠 䏐䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䑰䌀. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 2, 4, 7 䎀 10 䏐䍐 䐐䍐 䍰䌀䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌠䌀䐠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0800-0900

0900-1000

1000-1100

1100-1200

1200-1300

1300-1400

1400-1500

1500-1600

1600-1700

1700-1800

route 1route 2route 3route 4route 5route 6

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0800-0900

0900-1000

1000-1100

1100-1200

1200-1300

1300-1400

1400-1500

1500-1600

1600-1700

1700-1800

route 7route 8route 9route 10route 11route 12

Page 79: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

79

4.3. 䇰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰䈐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䒐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䐠䒠䏰䎠䌀 䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䍰䍐䏀䍐 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䎀䍀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀

䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀 䌠䒠䐀䑐䐰 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠. 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䍐 䍐䍀䎀䏐 䌠䌀䍠䍐䏐 䎀䏐䍀䎀䎠䌀䐠䏠䐀 䏰䐀䎀 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰䌀 䏐䌀 䍀䌀䏐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䎀 䍀䏠䌐䌀䌠䓰 䍀䐀䐰䌰䏠 䎀䍰䏀䍐䐀䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀. 䇠䐠 䌰䎰䍐䍀䏐䌀 䐠䏠䑰䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀, 䎀䏀䌀 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䌀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䐠䏠䌠䌀, 䍀䌀䎰䎀 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠 䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䏠 䍰䌀 䍐䍀䎀䏐 䑰䌀䐐 䎀 䐐䎰䍐䍀 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䏠䐐䌠䏠䌐䏠䍠䍀䌀䌠䌀 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䒐 䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰, 䎀䎰䎀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰䌠䌀 䑠䓰䎰 䍀䍐䏐 䎀 䌐䎰䏠䎠䎀䐀䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䍀䒠䎰䒠䌰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀, 䌐䍐䍰 䍀䌀 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀 䏠䐠 䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀.

4.3.1. 䈐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰.䆠䌀䐠䏠 䏐䌀䑰䌀䎰䏠, 䍰䌀 䍀䌀 䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䎀䏀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰 䏐䌀

䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀, 䐠䐀䓰䌐䌠䌀 䍀䌀 䎀䍰䑰䎀䐐䎰䎀䏀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀䓰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䍰䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀. 䅰䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰, 䍐䍀䏐䌀 䎠䏠䎰䌀, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䍰䌀 䏀䌀䎰䎠䏠 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䏠䐠 䍀䌠䌀 䑰䌀䐐䌀 (129 䏀䎀䏐䐰䐠䎀). 䈐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䍰䌀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍐 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䏠 (140 䏀䎀䏐䐰䐠䎀), 䏠䐠 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 (112 䏀䎀䏐䐰䐠䎀), 䌠䒠䏰䐀䍐䎠䎀, 䑰䍐 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏠䐠䏐䏠䐐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䍐 䏀䌀䎰䎠䌀.

䆠䌀䎠䐠䏠 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䎀䍀䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䒐䌀䐠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀, 䎀䏀䌀 䓰䐐䏐䌀 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䎠䌀 䏀䍐䍠䍀䐰 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐:

0

50

100

150

200

250

route 1 route 2 route 3 route 4 route 5 route 6 route 7 route 8 route 9 route 10 route 11 route 12

Page 80: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

80

䆠䌀䐀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䌀䎠䐀䎀䌀䏐䍐 䏰䏠 䍰䏠䏐䎀

䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏠䐠 1 䍀䏠 7, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰 䍐 䏰䏠-䐐䎠䏠䐀䏠 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 8 䎀 12, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䐐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀, 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䍐 䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䎠䌀, 䏐䏠 䏐䍐 䐠䌀䎠䌀 䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠, 䏠䐠䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠䐠䏠 䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀䐠䍐 䍰䏠䏐䎀.

䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐 9 䎀 11 (䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䎠䏠 䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䍐䏐䏠 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䌀 10), 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䍐 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀, 䌠 䐐䐀䌀䌠䏐䍐䏐䎀䍐 䐐 䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀䐠䍐. 䇠䐠 䍐䍀䏐䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䍐 䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䏠, 䏰䏠䐀䌀䍀䎀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䏠䏰䏠䎰䏠䍠䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䐠䍐䍰䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀, 䏐䏠 䏠䐠 䍀䐀䐰䌰䌀, 䍐 䌠 䏰䐀䏠䐠䎀䌠䏠䐀䍐䑰䎀䍐 䐐 䑀䌀䎠䐠䌀, 䑰䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䌠 䐠䍐䍰䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀.

4.3.2. 䈀䌀䍰䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰.

䅀䐀䐰䌰 䎀䏐䍀䎀䎠䌀䐠䏠䐀, 䎠䏠䎐䐠䏠 䏰䏠䎠䌀䍰䌠䌀 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䍀䍐䐠䌀䎐䎰䎀, 䏠䐠 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠, 䍐 䐀䌀䍰䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰: 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䎠䏠䎰䎀 䐐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀 䍰䌀 䍐䍀䎀䏐䌀 䑰䌀䐐, 䍀䌠䌀 䑰䌀䐐䌀, 䐠䐀䎀 䑰䌀䐐䌀 䎀 䐠.䏐.? 䄠 䐠䏠䍰䎀 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰, 䎠䏠䎰䎀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䐐䌀 䌐䎀䎰䎀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䍐䍀䎀䏐 䏰䒠䐠 䐐䍐 䐐䏀䓰䐠䌀䐠 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䍰䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䒠䎠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀, 䎠䏠䎰䎀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䐐䌀 䐀䌀䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䎀䐀䌀䏐䎀 䏠䐠 䍀䌠䌀 䍀䏠 䑰䍐䐠䎀䐀䎀 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏠䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䏰䒠䐠䎀 䐐䍐 䐐䑰䎀䐠䌀 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䍐䏐 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎀 䐐䌀 䏰䍐䐠 䎀 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏠䌠䌀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䐀䍐䌰䎀䐐䐠䐀䌀䑠䎀䎀 䐐䍐 䐐䑰䎀䐠䌀䐠 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐.

Page 81: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

81

䅰䌀 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍰䏠䏐䌀, 䏠䎠䏠䎰䏠 65% 䏠䐠 䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䐐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀 䍰䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䒠䎠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 (䐐䌀䏀䏠 1 䑰䌀䐐 䎀䎰䎀 䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䎠䏠 䏠䐠 1 䑰䌀䐐). 25% 䐐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀 䎠䏠䎰䎀䐠䍐 䐐䎀 䍀䏠 4 䑰䌀䐐䌀 䎀 䐐䌀䏀䏠 10%, 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䏠䐠 䏰䏠䎰䌠䎀䏐 䍀䍐䏐. 䅐䑀䍐䎠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍐 䏰䏠-䐐䎠䏠䐀䏠 䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠 䎀 䍐 䏠䐠 䍰䏐䌀䑰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䍰䌀 䑐䏠䐀䌀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䐠 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Study area - total Study area - free places Study area - payedplaces

long durationmedium durationshort duration

䅰䌀 䏠䐠䍀䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䌀䐀䒀䐀䐰䐠䎀, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䓰䐐䏐䏠 䐐䍐 䍰䌀䌐䍐䎰䓰䍰䌠䌀 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀, 䏰䏠䌠䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍐 䐀䌀䍰䎰䎀䑰䏐䏠 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

route1

route2

route3

route4

route5

route6

route7

route8

route9

route10

route11

route12

long durationmedium durationshort duration

Page 82: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

82

䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 1 䎀 2, 䍀䍐䎰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰 䍐 䐐䒠䒐䎀䓰, 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䍰䏠䏐䌀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 3 䎀 6 䎀䏀䌀 䍰䌀䌐䍐䎰䍐䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠 䏐䎀䐐䒠䎠 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎀 䎀 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䎀䑠䌀 䏠䐠 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䍀䒠䎰䌰䎀䓰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 4, 5 䎀 7, 䏠䐠 䍀䐀䐰䌰䌀 䐐䐠䐀䌀䏐䌀, 䎀䏀䌀 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎀 䎀 䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠 䍀䓰䎰 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎀. 䈐䒠䒐䏠, 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䌀 8, 䍀䍐䎰䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎀 䍐 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䏠, 䎠䏠䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䎀䏀䌀 䏰䐀䍐䍀䌠䎀䍀, 䑰䍐 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐䐠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䌠䒠䍰䏰䐀䍐䏰䓰䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀, 䎀䎰䎀 䏐䌀䎐-䏀䌀䎰䎠䏠䐠䍐 䍐 䏐䍐䌀䐠䐀䌀䎠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 9, 10 䎀 11, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏰䐀䍐䍀䎰䌀䌰䌀䐠 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀, 䍀䍐䎰䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䎠䐀䌀䐠䎠䎀䐠䍐 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䍐 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠. 䆠䌀䎠䐠䏠 䏀䏠䍠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䎀䍀䎀 䏐䌀 䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䒐䌀䐠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䑀䎀䎠䌀, 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䏐䌀䎐-䑰䍐䐐䐠䏠 䍐 䏰䐀䎀䑰䎀䏐䍐䏐䏠, 䍰䌀䒐䏠䐠䏠 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䏰䐀䎀䌠䎰䎀䑰䌀䐠 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀 䍀䓰䎰 (䏐䌀䍀 30%) 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䐐 䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐.

Page 83: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

83

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Route 9 10 11 Total Route 9 10 11 Free Route 9 10 11 Payed

long durationmedium durationshort duration

䇐䌀䎠䐀䌀䓰, 䍰䏠䏐䌀 12 䎀䏀䌀 䏰䏠-䐐䎠䏠䐀䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䏠䌠䍐䍀䍐䏐䎀䍐, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䍐 䎀䍰䏐䍐䏐䌀䍀䌀, 䍰䌀䒐䏠䐠䏠 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐䐠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䎀 䐐䍐 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀 䍀䍐䎰䌀 䏐䌀 䍀䍐䎰䌰䎀䓰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䎐 䍀䌀 䍐 䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠.

4.4. 䇰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䇠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䒠䐠 䍐 䎠䏠䎰䎀䑰䍐䐐䐠䌠䍐䏐䌀 䎀䏐䍀䎀䎠䌀䑠䎀䓰 䍰䌀 䐠䏠䌠䌀, 䎠䏠䎰䎠䏠 䍐 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠䐠䏠

䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䏠䏰䐀䍐䍀䍐䎰䍐䏐 䏰䌀䐀䎀䏠䍀. 䆠䌀䐠䏠 䑠䓰䎰䏠, 䏰䏠-䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠, 䏠䍰䏐䌀䑰䌀䌠䌀 䏰䏠-䍀䏠䌐䐀䏠 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀: 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䎠䏠䎰䎀 䒐䍐 䌐䒠䍀䌀䐠 䏠䌐䐐䎰䐰䍠䌠䌀䏐䎀 䍰䌀 䐐䒠䒐䎀䓰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠.

䇠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䒠䐠 䍐 䌠 䎠䏠䏀䌐䎀䏐䌀䑠䎀䓰 䐐 䍀䐀䐰䌰䎀䐠䍐 䏰䏠䎠䌀䍰䌀䐠䍐䎰䎀 - 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䎀 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐. 䄀䎠䏠 䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䍐 䏰䏠-䌠䎀䐐䏠䎠䌀, 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䎠䏠䎰䎀 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䐠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀, 䏠䍰䏐䌀䑰䌀䌠䌀 䎀 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䌀䌠䌀. 䄀䎠䏠 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰 䏐䌀䏀䌀䎰䓰䌠䌀, 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐 䎠䏠䎰䎀 䏀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䐠 䍐䍀䏐䏠 䎀 䐐䒠䒐䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䎀 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䌀 䒐䍐 䐐䍐 䏰䏠䌠䎀䒀䎀.

䄠 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐, 䐐䐀䍐䍀䏐䎀䓰 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠 䍐 䐀䌀䌠䍐䏐 䏐䌀 3.6. 䇰䐀䍐䍰 䑠䓰䎰䎀䓰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐 (䏠䐠 8.00 䑰. 䅀䏠 18.00 䑰.), 䌠䐐䓰䎠䏠 䏰䌀䐀䎠䏠 䏀䓰䐐䐠䏠 䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䏠 䏠䐠 3.6 䏰䐀䍐䌠䏠䍰䏐䎀 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䌀. 䇠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䒠䐠 䍐 䏀䌀䎰䎠䏠 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀 䏰䐀䎀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 (3.9), 䏰䐀䏠䐠䎀䌠䏐䏠 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 (3.4).

Page 84: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

84

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

Study area - total Study area - free places Study area - payed places

䇐䌀䎐-䌰䏠䎰䍐䏀䎀䓰 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠 䐐䍐 䏐䌀䏀䎀䐀䌀 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䌀 8, 䎠䏠䍐䐠䏠 䎰䏠䌰䎀䑰䏐䏠, 䐠䒠䎐 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䌠 䐠䌀䍰䎀 䍰䏠䏐䌀, 䏰䏠䌠䍐䑰䍐䐠䏠 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䐐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䌀 12, 䏠䌐䌀䑰䍐, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䍐 䐐䒠䒐䏠 䐐 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀, 䐠䏠䌠䌀 䏐䍐 䍐 䐠䏠䎰䎠䏠䌠䌀 䓰䐐䏐䏠 䎀䍰䐀䌀䍰䍐䏐䏠. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 9, 10 䎀 11, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䐐䒠䒐䏠 䐐䌀 䏠䐠䑰䌀䐐䐠䎀 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐 䐀䍐䍠䎀䏀, 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䒠䐠 䍀䏠䐀䎀 䍐 䏐䌀䎐-䏐䎀䐐䒠䎠 䏠䐠 䑠䓰䎰䌀䐠䌀 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䌀 䐠䍐䐀䎀䐠䏠䐀䎀䓰. 䇠䐐䏐䏠䌠䏐䏠䐠䏠 䏠䌐䓰䐐䏐䍐䏐䎀䍐 䌠䍐䐀䏠䓰䐠䏐䏠, 䍐 䑰䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䍰䌀 䍀䒠䎰䒠䌰 䏰䍐䐀䎀䏠䍀 䍐 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐䏠 䐐 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䑠䍐䏐䐠䐀䌀䎰䏐䌀䐠䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

route 1 route 2 route 3 route 4 route 5 route 6 route 7 route 8 route 9 route 10 route 11 route 12

䆀 䐠䌀䎠䌀, 䍐䑀䍐䎠䐠䒠䐠 䏠䐠 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䓰 䐀䍐䍠䎀䏀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 9, 10 䎀 11 䍐 䏠䑰䍐䌠䎀䍀䍐䏐, 䏐䏠 䍐 䏰䏠-䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠 䏠䐠 䏠䑰䌀䎠䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰. 䇰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䎀䏀䌀䐠 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠 䏠䐠 2.9, 䍀䏠䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀 䍐2.2.

Page 85: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

85

5. 䆀䅰䄠䇠䅀䆀䇰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀䐠䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䐐䌀 䓰䐐䏐䎀 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䎀䐠䍐 3, 6, 8 䎀 9, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠

䍰䌀䍐䐠䏠䐐䐠䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏀䍐䐐䐠䌀䐠䌀 䍐 䏐䌀䍀 䍀䏠䏰䐰䐐䐠䎀䏀䏠䐠䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠 䏠䐠 85%, 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䏰䏠-䌰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀䐠䌀 䑰䌀䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䍀䍐䏐䓰.

䉐䌀䐀䌀䎠䐠䍐䐀䏐䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䎀 䐐䍐 䐐䐀䍐䒐䌀䐠 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 1, 5, 11 䎀 12, 䎠䒠䍀䍐䐠䏠 䌠 䏐䓰䎠䏠䎀 䏀䏠䏀䍐䏐䐠䎀 䏰䐀䍐䍰 䍀䍐䏐䓰, 䏠䌐䒐䏠 䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䎰䎀䌠䏠䐠䏠 䏐䎀䌠䏠 䍐 䍀䏠䐐䐠䎀䌰䏐䌀䐠䏠.

䇰䐀䏠䌐䎰䍐䏀䒠䐠 䍐 䐠䓰䐐䏐䏠 䐐䌠䒠䐀䍰䌀䏐 䐐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰, 䎠䏠䎐䐠䏠 䍐 䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䍀䒠䎰䒠䌰, 䏠䐐䏠䌐䍐䏐䏠 䌠 䍰䏠䏐䎀 3, 6, 9 䎀 11. 䄠 䍰䏠䏐䌀 8, 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰 䍐 䏰䏠-䐐䎠䏠䐀䏠 䎠䐀䌀䐠䒠䎠, 䐠䌀䎠䌀 䑰䍐 䐠䌀䏀 䒐䍐 䎀䏀䌀 䏐䐰䍠䍀䌀 䏠䐠 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䎀 䏰䐀䏠䐰䑰䌠䌀䏐䎀䓰.

䄰䏠䎰䓰䏀䌀䐠䌀 䏰䐀䏠䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀䐠䍐䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀䍰䌰䎰䍐䍠䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䍀䒠䎰䍠䎀 䏐䌀 䏐䍐䐀䍐䍀䏐䏠䐐䐠䎀 䌠䒠䌠 䑀䐰䏐䎠䑠䎀䏠䏐䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䍰䏠䏐䎀. 䄠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䎀 䏰䐀䎀䑰䎀䏐䎀 䐐䌀 䑠䍐䏐䌀䐠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐, 䎠䏠䓰䐠䏠 䐐䍐 䌠䒠䍰䏰䐀䎀䍐䏀䌀 䏠䐠 䏰䏠䐠䐀䍐䌐䎀䐠䍐䎰䎀䐠䍐 䎠䌀䐠䏠 䏐䎀䐐䎠䌀, 䎀䎰䎀, 䏐䌀䎐-䌠䍐䐀䏠䓰䐠䏐䏠, 䎰䎀䏰䐐䌀䐠䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䏐䐠䐀䏠䎰, 䏰䏠䏠䒐䐀䓰䌠䌀 䑐䏠䐀䌀䐠䌀 䍀䌀 䏐䍐 䏰䎰䌀䒐䌀䐠 䍰䌀 䑠䓰䎰䏠䐠䏠 䌠䐀䍐䏀䍐. 䄐䎀 䌐䎀䎰䏠 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䍐䐐䏐䏠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䎀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎀䍰䐐䎰䍐䍀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䐐 䍀䏠䏰䒠䎰䏐䎀䐠䍐䎰䍐䏐 䌀䏐䌀䎰䎀䍰 䏐䌀

Page 86: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

86

䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䍐䐠䍐 䍰䏠䏐䎀: 䎠䌀䎠䒠䌠 䍐 䍀䍐䎰䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䎰䎀䐠䍐 䎠䏠䎰䎀, 䍰䌀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䍐 䎠䏠䐀䍐䎠䐠䏐䏠 䍰䌀䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䏠, 䎠䌀䎠䒠䌠 䍐 䍀䍐䎰䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䎰䎀䐠䍐, 䍰䌀 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䍐 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䏠 䏰䏠-䏐䍐䎠䏠䐀䍐䎠䐠䍐䏐 䏐䌀䑰䎀䏐, 䌐䍐䍰䏠䐠䑰䍐䐠䏐䏠 (䏀䏐䏠䌰䏠 䏀䌀䎰䒠䎠), 䎠䌀䎠䒠䌠 䍐 䍀䍐䎰䒠䐠 䏐䌀 䎀䍰䏠䌐䒐䏠 䏐䍐 䏰䎰䌀䐠䎀䎰䎀䐠䍐. 䈠䏠䌠䌀 䌐䎀 䏀䏠䌰䎰䏠 䍀䌀䍀䍐 䎀䏐䐠䍐䐀䍐䐐䏐䌀 䎀䏐䑀䏠䐀䏀䌀䑠䎀䓰 䌠 䏰䏠䐐䏠䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䏰䏠䍀䏠䌐䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䏠䏐䎀.

䄠䒠䍰䏀䏠䍠䏐䎀 䏀䍐䐀䎠䎀, 䎠䏠䎀䐠䏠 䏀䏠䌰䌀䐠 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䌠䍰䍐䏀䌀䐠䌀, 䌠 䍰䌀䌠䎀䐐䎀䏀䏠䐐䐠 䏠䐠 䍰䏠䏐䌀䐠䌀 䐐䌀:

• 䇰䐀䍐䏀䎀䏐䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐 䐀䍐䍠䎀䏀 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䍰䌀 䌠䐐䎀䑰䎠䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀;

• 䈐䒠䒐䍐䐐䐠䌠䐰䌠䌀䒐䎀䓰 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐 䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䎀䍰䏰䏠䎰䍰䌠䌀 䏰䏠-䍀䏠䌐䐀䍐 (䍀䌀 䐐䍐 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䎀 䏠䌐䏠䐀䏠䐠䌀), 䏰䏠䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠䏀 䐀䌀䍰䒀䎀䐀䓰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䎰䌀䐠䍐䏐䎀䐠䍐 䍰䏠䏐䎀 䎀䎰䎀 䌠䒠䌠䍐䍠䍀䌀䏐䍐䐠䏠 䏐䌀 䐐䎀䏐䎀 䍰䏠䏐䎀 (䏠䌰䐀䌀䏐䎀䑰䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䏰䐀䍐䐐䐠䏠䓰);

• 䆠䌀䐠䏠 䏰䏠䐐䎰䍐䍀䏐䏠 䐐䐀䍐䍀䐐䐠䌠䏠, 䐰䌠䍐䎰䎀䑰䌀䌠䌀䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䏐䌰 䎠䌀䏰䌀䑠䎀䐠䍐䐠䌀.

Page 87: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

87

Page 88: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

88

Page 89: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

89

Page 90: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

90

Page 91: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

91

Page 92: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

92

Page 93: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

93

Page 94: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

94

Page 95: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

95

Page 96: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

96

Page 97: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

97

Page 98: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

98

Page 99: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

99

Page 100: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

100

Page 101: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

101

Page 102: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

102

Page 103: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

103

Page 104: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

104

Page 105: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

105

Page 106: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

106

Page 107: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

107

Mott MacDonald Group

Managing Urban Mobility Successfully - the UK ExperienceAndrew Walsh

ITS Associate DirectorMott MacDonald Ltd

Intelligent Transport Systems and Traffic Control

Page 108: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

108

Contents

• Managing Urban Networks• Managing Inter-Urban Networks

• Network Information Provision

• Achieving Integrated Networks

Setting the Scene in UK

• English Strategic Road (inter-urban) road network operated and managed by the Highways Agency

– Mixture of Motorway and Trunk roads

– National Control Centre for England

– 7 Regional Control Centres

• Urban road network operated by Local Authorities at a City level

• Both sets of organisations separately funded and monitored in different ways

Page 109: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

109

Managing Urban Networks

Some of the available tools used by network managers:

• Urban Traffic Management and Control – SCATS, SCOOT, MOTION etc.

• Bus Priority – improving journey time reliability• Congestion Charging – influencing driver behaviour

• Urban Route Guidance – providing driver choice• Trip Information provision – influence modal change• Schemes Management – reducing potential for congestion

Managing Urban Networks

Urban Traffic Management and Control (UTMC)• Ability to automatically adjust signal timings• Strategies to mitigate unplanned events

• Able to adjust cycle times on diversion routes in event of long term incident• Provides data which can be analysed to improve overall road network

performance

Page 110: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

110

Bus Priority• Late running and full buses

get priority

• Dedicated bus lane to improve journey times

• Arrival times provided at stop

• On-bus information also provided

• Vehicle tracking allows better analysis of running times

Managing Urban Networks

Congestion Charging

• Mixed benefits and benefits decay over time

• Trialling of added value services to compensate for paying congestion charges

• Information on special events and traffic conditions within the zone via hands free phone.

• Reminder if the charge is still due and on payment options.

Managing Urban Networks

Page 111: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

111

Managing Urban Networks

Urban Route Guidance

• Car Park management

• Advance notification of Events

• Park and Ride facilities

• Incident management support information

• Corridor Management

Managing Urban Networks

Provision of Trip Information

• Available in the home, office or in hand

Page 112: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

112

Managing Urban Networks

Schemes Management

• Managing road space bookings

• Use of Technology to ensure that planned events have a minimal impact

• Alternative routes are kept free of road works

• All infrastructure and utility companies co-ordinate their activities

Page 113: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

113

Contents

• Managing Urban Networks

• Managing Inter-Urban Networks• Network Information Provision

• Achieving Integrated Networks

Managing Inter-Urban Networks

Some of the available tools:

• Incident Management Systems – co-ordinated responses to unplanned events

• Active Traffic Management – Using available road space

• Controlled Motorway – Enforced speed control

• Road Tolling – Influencing route choice

• High Occupancy Lanes – Reducing number of cars

• Pre-trip information provision – influencing mode & time of travel

• Strategic Route Guidance – Reducing delays

Page 114: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

114

Managing Inter-Urban Networks

Active Traffic Management• Use of Hard Shoulder to increase

available capacity• Speed enforcement• Requires lane discipline• Variable Speeds dependent on

road conditions• Automatic operation

Managing Inter-Urban Networks

Controlled Motorways

• Uses existing road surface

• Improves throughput by maintaining constant speed

• More reliable journey times

• Only used in periods of high occupancy

Page 115: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

115

Managing Inter-Urban Networks

Road Tolling• Fixed Tolls – ANPR enforcement• Contactless Tolling – Tag and

Beacon solutions• Black-box Satellite Vehicle

tracking – Pay as You Go• High Occupancy Lanes – Pay to

Use

Managing Inter-Urban Networks

High Occupancy Lanes• Minimum number of

occupant depending on the number of lanes

• Hybrid vehicles also use lane

• If other lanes are congested pay extra to use

• Being considered for UK use

Page 116: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

116

Managing Inter-Urban Networks

Pre-Trip Information• Modal Choice – use alternative mode of

transport• Vary Route – avoid know problem

areas• Vary time of departure – ease

congestion• Predictive journey time based on

historic data – providing driver with information

• Access to real-time bus, train and ferry timetables and the current journey times – make informed choice

Contents

• Managing Urban Networks

• Managing Inter-Urban Networks

• Network Information Provision• Achieving Integrated Networks

Page 117: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

117

Network Information Provision

Some of the available tools:• General Information Prior to Departure

• Personalised Information During Journeys

• Predictive Information Based on Historic Information

• Use of Roadside Displays

• In-Car Guidance Systems using Real-Time data Feeds

Network Information Provision

General Information Prior to Departure

• Know where the traveller is intending to go – register journey in advance

• Provide real time information in the home - use TV, Radio, Internet

• Provide journey times for comparable alternatives – based on real time and historic data

• Provide advance notice of potential disruptions – allow alternative plans to be made

Page 118: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

118

Network Information Provision

Personalised Information During Journeys

• Ability to register journeys at a personal level

• Select the method by which information is then sent to traveller

• Establish a revenue model to pay for service (push technology more expensive to operate)

• Make this a multi-modal service to encourage modal shift

Network Information Provision

Predictive Information Based on Historic Data

• Ensure travel networks are adequately instrumented

• Collect all data and store in data warehouse

• Use historic data to analyse changes in travel patterns over time

• Determine, by modelling responses to cycle timings changes, the optimum settings

Database Real-TimeDatabase

MessageService

CurrentService

NotificationService

ReportingService

DataWarehouse

Information Services

Real-TimeServicesPlatform

Real-TimeServicesPlatform

CurrentService

NotificationService

OTAPService

SFSService

Page 119: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

119

Network Information Provision

Roadside Displays

• Provide information to the public when and where they need it

• Provide information on all mode of transport

• Provide information on planned events

• Show alternative routes to avoid disruption

Network Information Provision

In-Car Guidance• Provide real time data inputs to in-car satellite navigation systems

• Provide satellite navigation tools with set of preferred alternative routes• Upload regular journeys to enable personalisedjourneys to be monitored• Develop multi-modal satellite navigation with all modes of transport

available

Page 120: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

120

Contents

• Managing Urban Networks

• Managing Inter-Urban Networks

• Network Information Provision

• Achieving Integrated Networks

Achieving Integrated Networks

Some of the available tools:

• Incident Management Systems

• Integrated Control Rooms

• Better Information Provision

• All Stakeholders Share a Common Goal

• Provide Alternatives to the Car

• Flexibility by Employers and Employees

Page 121: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

121

Managing Inter-Urban Networks

Incident Management Systems• Intelligent, central system supported by human operators that recommend the

appropriate actions to take in event of unplanned incident occurring• Only effective if alternative routes are fully instrumented and data available in

real time

• Requires effective means of informing drivers in their vehicles

• Drivers need to be able to trust the system before they will obey instructions• Needs to be integrated with in car navigation devices to be effective

• Needs a co-ordinated approach across a region

Achieving Integrated Networks

Integrated Control Rooms• Overview of all ITS systems with single workstation access to all native

systems• Access to all CCTV Images• Improved Planned Event Management

• Active Fault and Asset Management• Active deployment of automated strategies to improve network

efficiency

Page 122: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

122

Achieving Integrated Networks

Better Information Provision• Provide all stakeholders with

all the available information in a tailored way

• Provide the data in real time• Ensure travellers get

information in the format they can understand at a location they require

• Use detection solutions that minimise disruption to road space for repair / maintenance

• Ensure adequate response procedures to unplanned events exist and are trialled

Achieving Integrated Networks

All Stakeholders Share a Common Goal• Understand the organisational needs of stakeholders• Co-Location of operational staff• Joint funding of facilities• Regular consultation with Stakeholders• Get political buy-in at senior level• Operate on a regional and multi-modal basis• Exercise emergency response plans together then

improve them

Page 123: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

123

Achieving Integrated Networks

Provide Alternatives to the car• Integrate the car with alternative travel modes, bus, train,

metro, tram, ferry• Provide secure Park & Ride facilities• Influence travel patterns through use of charging

mechanisms

• Encourage car sharing, high occupancy vehicles• Promote less polluting types of vehicles• Tell drivers how quick alternative options are to encourage

modal shift

• Manage the travel networks in a co-ordinated way

Achieving Integrated Networks

Flexibility by Employers & Employees

• Adjust start/end times for different employers at high density industrial estates

• Vary start time of colleges / schools

• Maintain a high degree of security for travellers at all times

Page 124: Urban Mobility

䇰䏠䎰䎀䐠䎀䎠䌀 䍰䌀 䏰䌀䐀䎠䎀䐀䌀䏐䍐 䎀 䐰䐐䐠䏠䎐䑰䎀䌠䏠 䐰䏰䐀䌀䌠䎰䍐䏐䎀䍐 䏐䌀 䌰䐀䌀䍀䐐䎠䌀䐠䌀 䏀䏠䌐䎀䎰䏐䏠䐐䐠

124

Achieving Integrated Networks

In Summary• IMS is achieved through data integration but at a cost of

instrumentation• In the UK we can’t build our way out of congestion• We need to ensure that each different agency works in a co-

ordinated way• We need to be able to directly influence travel patterns • We need to use technology for the benefit of the travelling

public• We need to provide real alternatives to the car

The above will enable us to manage our road networks better

www.mottmac.comwww.cdmf.info

www.halogenonline.co.uk

*䈐䏐䎀䏀䎠䌀 䏐䌀 䎠䏠䐀䎀䑠䌀䐠䌀 䎀 䐐䒠䐐䐠䌀䌠䓰䏐䍐 䏐䌀 䐐䌐䏠䐀䏐䎀䎠䌀 – 䉐䐀䎀䐐䐠䏠 䇐䎀䎠䏠䎰䏠䌠