1
On Wed, April 29, 2009 10:46 pm, [email protected] wrote: > In a message dated 4/29/2009 3:38:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > As you know, the Divorce Judgment dictates a M-W-F from 9 – 4 schedule. > If you are now demanding that we comply with that schedule explicitly, > please let me know and I will immediately address the issue with Lori. > What kind of a response is this? Neither party has ever had any real interest > in the particular schedule set out by the Court. From the beginning, > we tried to craft a schedule that was convenient for the parties, and > that honored the 21 hours required by the Court. However, from the > beginning you and Lori have refused to permit Igor to enjoy his > daughter for any more than 18 hours. At first, you said it was just > part of the transitional period. But time after time when we have> asked/demanded/implored/begged for the additional 3 hours you have > essentially told us to go pound sand. If we want the additional 3 > hours > -- your refrain has been -- then it will only be according to the > Court's inconvenient schedule, explicitly. We have proposed a number > of ways to achieve the 21 hours just by tweaking our agreed-to > schedule. You and Lori have never agreed, or even been willing to > discuss it. You two seem to think that you hold all the cards, so why > should you give us the time of day? That is what I mean by telling > you that your behavior has been shameful. It has been. As you know, > it continues to be our intention to follow the dictates of the Judgment explicitly. Are you serious? Come on counselor, is that a joke? Lori has clearly demonstrated her intention to freeze Igor out > of Mila's life as much as possible at every turn, and with your > assistance, she has achieved some successes. I want you and Lori to > understand that I have every intention of staying in this case . . . > as long as it takes. Further, I have no compunction investing not > only my time, but my resources, and the very substantial resources of my family, if necessary. But also rest assured that THIS time, I am > confident the judge will grant me my attorney fees when he hears > about how horrendous Lori and you have made this situation, how you > have worked in tandem to deny a loving father his parental rights. I > have never felt so strongly about a case in my life. This is > personal for me at this point. You see, I care about Mila. For me, this is not a game. >

Waxman email

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Waxman email

On Wed, April 29, 2009 10:46 pm, [email protected] wrote:

> In a message dated 4/29/2009 3:38:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes:>> As you know, the Divorce Judgment dictates a M-W-F from 9 – 4 schedule.> If you are now demanding that we comply with that schedule explicitly, > please let me know and I will immediately address the issue with Lori.> What kind of a response is this? Neither party has ever had any real interest > in the particular schedule set out by the Court. From the beginning, > we tried to craft a schedule that was convenient for the parties, and > that honored the 21 hours required by the Court. However, from the > beginning you and Lori have refused to permit Igor to enjoy his > daughter for any more than 18 hours. At first, you said it was just > part of the transitional period. But time after time when we have> asked/demanded/implored/begged for the additional 3 hours you have > essentially told us to go pound sand. If we want the additional 3 > hours > -- your refrain has been -- then it will only be according to the > Court's inconvenient schedule, explicitly. We have proposed a number > of ways to achieve the 21 hours just by tweaking our agreed-to > schedule. You and Lori have never agreed, or even been willing to > discuss it. You two seem to think that you hold all the cards, so why > should you give us the time of day? That is what I mean by telling > you that your behavior has been shameful. It has been. As you know, > it continues to be our intention to follow the dictates of the Judgment explicitly. Are you serious? Come on counselor, is that a joke?

Lori has clearly demonstrated her intention to freeze Igor out > of Mila's life as much as possible at every turn, and with your > assistance, she has achieved some successes. I want you and Lori to > understand that I have every intention of staying in this case . . .> as long as it takes. Further, I have no compunction investing not > only my time, but my resources, and the very substantial resources of my family, if necessary. But also rest assured that THIS time, I am > confident the judge will grant me my attorney fees when he hears > about how horrendous Lori and you have made this situation, how you > have worked in tandem to deny a loving father his parental rights. I > have never felt so strongly about a case in my life. This is > personal for me at this point. You see, I care about Mila. For me, this is not a game.>