Upload
jin-sung-kim
View
1.447
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to Dose Algorithm for Scanning Beam.
Citation preview
Dose Modeling?
• 우리가 가진 방사선원에 대한 특징을 • 정확히 모사할 수 있는 Simulation Tool! !
• 일반적으로 MC가 가장 정확하다고 알려져있지만, • 속도에 대한 부분이 해결이 어렵기 때문에 • 필요한 가정(!!)들을 포함하여 • 간단+정확한 모델로 만들어서 • 환자 체내의 선량을 계산해 내는 수식(?) 만들기! • 필요에 따라 변수들 조절
2
3
Proton Dose!
4
SMC NozzleQuadrupole
magnet
Wobbling magnet
Dose monitor 2D monitor
MLC
Block
He gas duct
Quadrupole magnet
Wobbling magnet
Dose monitor 2D monitor Dose monitor
2D monitor
Quadrupole magnet
Scanning magnet
Scatterer
Ridge filter
MLC
Block
Compensator Block
Wobbling (scattering) Scanning Scanning
MultiPurpose Nozzle (G1)
PBS dedicated Nozzle (G2)
Proton Dose Modeling• Passive Scattering • Scanning • Monte-Carlo Simulation
6http://vimeo.com/aapm/343
Reference• Hong L, Goitein M, Bucciolini M, Comiskey R, Gottschalk B, Rosenthal S, Serago C
and Urie M 1996 A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations Phys. Med. Biol. 41 1305–30
• B. Schaffner, E. Pedroni, and A. Lomax, “Dose calculation models for pro- ton treatment planning using a dynamic beam delivery system: An attempt to include density heterogeneity effects in the analytical dose calculation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 27–41 (1999)
• M. Soukup, M. Fippel, and M. Alber, “A pencil beam algorithm for in- tensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 5089–5104 (2005)
• Kimstrand P, Traneus E, Ahnesjo ̈A, Grusell E, Glimelius B and Tilly N 2007 A beam source model for scanned proton beams Phys. Med. Biol. 52 3151–68
• Y. Li, X. R. Zhu, N. Sahoo, A. Anand, and X. Zhang, “Beyond Gaussians: A study of single-spot modeling for scanning proton dose calculation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 983–997 (2012)
• Zhu XR1, Poenisch F, Lii M, Sawakuchi GO, “Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system,” Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041723.
7
8
Proton Scanning Modeling
Pencil Beam Algorithm
• Fluence(x,y,z) of Ek x Beamlet (x,y,d(z))
10Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041723
Pencil Beam’s Beamlet
• Interactions • Primary Proton
• elastic interaction with electron
• elastic proton-nucleus scattering
• Secondary Proton • nonelastic nuclear interaction
• secondary proton, other fragments
11Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041723
12
• Stopping Power • Lateral distribution • Klat,pp : Multiple Coulomb Scattering • Molière theory
• is approximated by the sum of two Gaussian functions representing the scattering angles probability
• 2nd Gaussian describes the tail of the scattering distribution due to large angle scattering, which accounts for only 4% of the contributions
• Klat,sp : “Halo” dose • lateral dose distribution of the 2nd particles for the beamlet
and is represented by the 3rd Gaussian functionMed Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041723
13
Sigma?
Definition of Sigma!
• 68-95-99.7 rule?
14
15
2D Gaussian
16
17
Double Gaussian Tuning!
• A, B, C for1st Gaussian • Sigma + Fitting
• A, B, C for 2nd Gaussian • Empirical
1. increase w2 to improve the agreements between measured and calculated FSFs for 3E (Low, Intermediate, High E)
2.A, B, C adjustment to match FSFs for 3E at 2 depth (2cm, proximal)
3.w2 was linearly interpolated for 17E & step 2 was repeated 4.w2 & A, B, C were linearly interpolated for 74E
• Not large enough to predict the FSFs18
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041723
What’s Double Gaussian?
19
• Y. Li, X. R. Zhu, N. Sahoo, A. Anand, and X. Zhang, “Beyond Gaussians: A study of single-spot modeling for scanning proton dose calculation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 983–997 (2012)
20
• Y. Li, X. R. Zhu, N. Sahoo, A. Anand, and X. Zhang, “Beyond Gaussians: A study of single-spot modeling for scanning proton dose calculation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 983–997 (2012)
Lateral profiles of individual scanning spots modeled at various depths using the double- Gaussian functions and Cauchy–Lorentz component (solid lines) and double-Gaussian functions only (dashed lines). The measured lateral profiles at shallow, medium and deep depths are indicated by the circle, triangle and square markers, respectively. In the top plot (221.8 MeV), the red (gray) circles, green (gray) triangles, blue (dark) squares and the corresponding solid and dashed lines correspond to depths of 2, 19 and 30 cm, respectively. In the middle plot (181.1 MeV), the red circles, green triangles, blue squares and the corresponding lines correspond to depths of 2, 10 and 20 cm, respectively. In the bottom plot (72.5 MeV), the red circles, blue squares and the corresponding solid and dashed lines represent depths of 2 and 4 cm, respectively
PBS’s Beam Data ComparisonXio RayStation
IDDCs Min-Max 5~10 MeV step
Min-Max 1-2cm spacing
MUDose @ E same as IDDCs
2cm depth FS 10x10 (8x8), 2.5mm spacing
Dose @ E same as IDDCs Depth is between 1cm and one half
of the bragg peak max
VSAD Profiles @ least 3 planes
Spot 2D array or film In air, for E same as IDDCs
In air 5 planes recommendation(min:3)Profiles @ isocenter plane
Divergence @ isocenter, +-10 cm
With beam modifiers
Range shifter, ridge filter @ 3 planes (min, middle, max)
X
RayStation’s PBS
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
To Be Continue
오늘은 여기까지…
30