17
Marriage: South Carolina’s No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Children and Three Steps to Reverse the Damage A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • 2012 Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society

Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Marriage:South Carolina’s No. 1

Weapon AgainstChildhood Poverty

How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Childrenand Three Steps to Reverse the Damage

A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • 2012

Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society

Page 2: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Growth of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in South Carolina, 1929–2010

PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK Throughout most of South Carolina’s history, out-of-wedlock childbearing was rare.

When the federal government’s War on Poverty began in 1964, only 12.8 percent of children in South Carolina were born out of wedlock. However, over the next four decades, the number rose rapidly. By 2010, 47.5 percent of births in South Carolina occurred outside of marriage.

Note: Initiated by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964, the War on Poverty led to the creation of more than three dozen welfare programs to aid poor persons. Government has spent $16.7 trillion on means-tested aid to the poor since 1964.

Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health Statistics.

heritage.orgChart 1 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

47.5%

Page 3: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Death of Marriage in South Carolina, 1929–2010

PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN TO MARRIED COUPLESThe marital birth rate—the percentage of all births that occur to married parents—is the flip side of the out-of-wedlock birth rate.

Through most of the 20th cen-tury, marital births were the norm in South Carolina. In 1964, over 87 percent of births occurred to married couples.

However, in the mid-1960s, the marital birth rate began to fall steadily. By 2010, only 52.5 per-cent of births in South Carolina occurred to married couples.

Note: In any given year, the sum of the out-of-wedlock birth rate (Chart 1) and the marital birth rate (Chart 2) equals 100 percent of all births.

Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health Statistics.

heritage.orgChart 2 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

40%

60%

80%

100%

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

52.5%

Page 4: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

In South Carolina, Marriage Drops the Probability of Child Poverty by 82 Percent

The rapid rise in out-of-wedlock childbearing is a major cause of high levels of child poverty in South Carolina.

Some 40.9 percent of single mothers with children are poor compared to 7.2 percent of mar-ried couples with children.

Single-parent families with children are nearly six times more likely to be poor than families in which the parents are married.

The higher poverty rate among single-mother families is due both to the lower education levels of the mothers and the lower income due to the absence of the father.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

heritage.orgChart 3 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Single-Parent, Female-Headed

Families

Married, Two-Parent Families

40.9%

7.2%

Page 5: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Nearly Four in Ten of All Families with Children in South Carolina Are Not MarriedOverall, married couples head about six in ten families with children in South Carolina. Over 39 percent are single-parent families.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

heritage.orgChart 4 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

Unmarried Families

Married Families

39.1%

60.9%

Page 6: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

In South Carolina, 77 Percent of Poor Families with Children Are Not Married

Among poor families with children in South Carolina, more than three-quarters are not married. By contrast, only 23.3 percent of poor families with children are headed by married couples.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

heritage.org

Unmarried Families

Married Families23.3%

76.7%

Chart 5 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

Page 7: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

In South Carolina Few Unwed Births Occur to Teenagers

Out-of-wedlock births are often confused erroneously with teen births, but only 8.3 percent of out-of-wedlock births in South Carolina occur to girls under age 18.

By contrast, some 78 percent of out-of-wedlock births occur to young adult women between the ages of 18 and 29.

Note: Figures have been rounded.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data.

heritage.orgChart 6 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS BY AGE OF MOTHER

Age18–19:16.7%

Age20–24:39.8%

Age25–29:21.9%

Age30–54:13.3%

UnderAge 18:8.3%

Page 8: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Less Educated Women Are More Likely to Give Birth Outside of Marriage Unwed childbearing occurs most frequently among the women who will have the greatest difficulty supporting children by themselves: those with low levels of education. In South Carolina, among women who are high school drop-outs, about 73.8 percent of all births occur outside marriage. Among women who have only a high school diploma, over 62 percent of all births occur outside marriage. By contrast, among women with at least a college degree, only 9.7 percent of births are out of wedlock.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data.

heritage.orgChart 7 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE MARITAL OR OUT OF WEDLOCK

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

High School Dropout

(0–11Years)

High School Graduate

(12Years)

SomeCollege(13–15Years)

College Graduate

(16+Years)

73.8%

62.1%

43.6%

9.7%

26.2%

37.9%

56.4%

90.3%

Mother’s education level

Unmarried Mothers

Married Mothers

Page 9: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Both Marriage and Education Are Highly Effective in Reducing Child Poverty in South Carolina

The poverty rate of married couples with children is dramati-cally lower than the rate for house-holds headed by single parents. This is true even when the married couple is compared to single par-ents with the same education level.

For example, in South Carolina, the poverty rate for a single mother who has only a high school diploma is 42.7 percent, but the poverty rate for a married couple family headed by an indi-vidual who, similarly, has only a high school degree is far lower at 9.4 percent.

On average, marriage drops the poverty rate by about 79 percent among families with the same education level.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005–2009 data.

heritage.orgChart 8 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

High School Dropout

High School Graduate

SomeCollege

College Graduate

67.1%

23.5%

42.7%

9.4%

31.6%

4.7%

12.4%

1.7%

Note: Virtually none of the heads of families in the chart who are high school dropouts are minor teenagers.

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR

Poverty Rate of Families by Education and Marital Status of the Head of Household

Single Married

Page 10: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Unwed Birth Rates Vary Strongly by Race in South Carolina

Out-of-wedlock childbearing varies considerably by race.

In 2008, 47.8 percent of births in South Carolina occurred out-side marriage. The rate was lowest among non-Hispanic whites at about three in ten births (30.1 percent). Among Hispanics, about half of births were out of wedlock. Among blacks, almost eight in ten births were to unmarried women (78 percent).

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data.

heritage.orgChart 9 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

PERCENT OF BIRTHS THAT ARE OUT OF WEDLOCK

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

All Races White Non-

Hispanic

Hispanic BlackNon-

Hispanic

47.8%

30.1%

49.8%

78.0%

8.3%

Page 11: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Growth of Unwed Childbearing by Race in South Carolina, 1934–2008

PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCKHistorically, out-of-wedlock childbearing has been somewhat more frequent among blacks than among whites. However, prior to the onset of the federal government’s War on Poverty in 1964, the rates for both whites and blacks were comparatively low.

In 1964, around one in forty (2.4 percent) white children were born outside marriage. By 2008, the number had risen to over three in ten (30.1 percent).

In 1964, about one in four black children (27.4 percent) were born outside marriage. By 2008, the number had risen to over three in four (78 percent).

Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health Statistics.

heritage.orgChart 10 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

Hispanic49.8%

White Non-Hispanic30.1%

Black Non-Hispanic78.0%

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 20080%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Page 12: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Racial Composition of All Births and Out-of-Wedlock Births in South Carolina

ALL BIRTHS OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHSIn South Carolina in 2008, some 55 percent of all births occurred to non-Hispanic whites, 32.7 percent occurred to non-Hispanic blacks, and 9.9 percent occurred to His-panics.

Because blacks and Hispanics are more likely to have children without being married, they account for disproportionately larger shares of all out-of-wedlock births.

In South Carolina in 2008, 34.6 percent of all non-marital births were to non-Hispanic whites, 53.4 percent were to black non-Hispanic women, and 10.3 percent were to Hispanics.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data.

heritage.orgChart 11 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

Note: Figures have been rounded.

55% White Non-Hispanic

Asian/Other

Black Non-Hispanic

Hispanic9.9%

32.7%

2.4%

34.6%

10.3%

53.4%

1.7%

Page 13: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Non-Married White Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor in South Carolina

Marriage leads to lower poverty rates for whites, blacks, and His-panics.

For example, in 2009, the poverty rate for married white families in South Carolina was 3.8 percent. But the poverty rate for non-married white families was more than six times higher at 24 percent.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

heritage.orgChart 12 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Married Families Non-Married Families

3.8%

24%

Page 14: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Non-Married Black Families Are Four Times More Likely to Be Poor in South Carolina

In 2009, the poverty rate for married black couples in South Carolina was 9 percent, while the poverty rate for non-married black families was four times higher at 38.6 percent.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

heritage.orgChart 13 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Married Families Non-Married Families

9%

38.6%

Page 15: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Non-Married Hispanic Families Are About Three Times More Likely to Be Poor in South Carolina

In 2009, the poverty rate for Hispanic married families in South Carolina was 18.4 percent, while the poverty rate among non-married families was almost three times higher at 49.9 percent.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

heritage.orgChart 14 • Marriage and Poverty in South Carolina

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Married Families Non-Married Families

18.4%

49.9%

Page 16: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

Three Steps to Reduce Child Poverty through Marriage

1) Provide information on the benefits of marriage in reducing child poverty and improving child well-being.

2) Reduce anti-marriage penalties in means-tested welfare programs.

3) Promote life-goal-planning, marriage-strengthening, and divorce-reduction programs to increase healthy marriages and reduce divorce and separation.

Marriage is a highly effective institution which greatly decreases parental and child poverty while improving long-term outcomes for children. Conversely, the absence of marriage greatly increases welfare costs and imposes added burdens on taxpayers.

Unfortunately, almost no information on these topics is available in low-income communities. This information deficit should be corrected in the following manner:

• Explain the benefits of marriage in middle and high schools with a high proportion of at-risk youth;

• Create public education campaigns in low-income communities on the benefits of marriage; and,

• Require federally funded birth control clinics to provide information on the benefits of marriage and the skills needed to develop stable families to interested low-income clients.

Page 17: Marriage Poverty - South Carolina

The Family & Religion Initiative is one of 10 Transformational Initiatives making up The Heritage Foundation’s Leadership for America campaign. For more products and information related to this initiative or to learn more about the Leadership for America campaign, please visit heritage.org.

The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited gov-ernment, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.

Our vision is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish. As conservatives, we believe the values and ideas that motivated our Founding Fathers are worth conserving. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and values.

214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org