View
592
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Osteo-artrose, zijn er nieuwe behandelingsmogelijkheden?
• Prof Dr Willem F Lems, VUmc en Reade • IWO, 3 october 2012
Osteo-arthrose (OA)
• Inleiding Felson: in VS 20 miljoen patienten met OA, in 2020 naar verwachting 40 miljoen!
• Hoe is dat in Nederland?
Cooper et al, BMJ 2011
Standardised Mortality: 1.55, (95% c.i. 1.41-1.70)
Metabolic Bone Changes in Rheumatic Diseases
Lories, Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005
Clinical update: treating osteoarthritis.
Lohmander S, Lancet 2007
Lancet 2011
Lancet 2011
Hoekstenen behandeling osteo-artrose
• Voorlichting, leefregels ; • Fysiotherapie; • Paracetamol; • NSAIDs/Coxibs, cave side effects; • Locale injecties met Glucocorticoiden; • Chrirurgische Interventies; • Experimentele therapie (anti Nerve Growth
factor, kraakbeentransplantatie; anti/osteoporose drugs)
Finish!
Controverse 1: Glucosaminen effectief?
• Glucosamine: Studies using a non-Rotta preparation failed to show a benefit in pain, while those with Rotta….show that glucosamine was superior to placebo” (Towheed, Cochrane 2005)
Joint Space Narrowing: -0,031 mm (placebo) versus -0,06 mm (verum): 0,24 mm (p=0,043)
Rates of a Primary Response in the Five Groups at 4 and 24 Weeks
Clegg, D. et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:795-808
Maar,
• Glucosamine-hydrochloride ipv glucosamine sulfaat; • Forse placebo-response; • Niet-optimale patienten-groep?
• Conclusie: wat betreft de primaire uitkomstmaat zijn de resultaten van de GAIT-trial negatief;
• Een korte proefbehandeling van 3 maanden kan zinvol zijn.
Lems en Bijlsma Ned Tijdschr Geneeskunde mei 2006
Ann Int Med 2008; 268-277
Controverse II: Chondrotoine, Not Recommended by NICE
• Chondrotoine (meta-analysis): Large-scale, methodologically sound trials indicate that the symptomatic benefit of chondrotoin is minimal or non-existent” (Reichenbach, Ann Int Med 2007);
Ann Int Med 2012
Controverse III: zijn alle voedingssupplementen veilig?
•
Seminar Arthritis Rheum 2009
“”NGF is overexpressed in may inflammatory and degenerative rheumatic diseases”
EULAR 2010: tanezumab reduces OA-knee pain (WOMAC).
0123456789
10
baseline 32 weeks
placebo2,5 mg5 mg10 mg
Brown et al, EULAR OP 157
* * **
*: p<0.05; **: p<0.01
GEN news highlights: June 24, 2010 Trials Halted as Pfizer's Tanezumab Shown to Worsen Osteoarthritis
• “”The clinical hold requested by FDA follows what Pfizer describes as a small number of reports that osteoarthritis patients receiving the mAb candidate experienced worsening of their disease and needed joint replacements””
• “As a result of the clinical hold all patients in the ongoing Phase III osteoarthritis program for tanezumab will have their treatment with the active drug stopped, and no new patients will be enrolled.
What about anti-osteoporotic drugs?
Strontium ranelate – Rationale in OA in vitro results
* Henro(n et al. JBMR 2001;16: 299-‐308
Proteoglycan produc0on (RIA)
Ü p < 0.001
• In normal and OA human chondrocytes cultures, Strontium ranelate (10-3 M) demonstrated a potential structure modifying effect: – Increases type II collagen synthesis – Increases high molecular weight proteoglycan synthesis
– Enhance IGF1-stimulated proteoglycan synthesis
Stron(um ranelate
Normal OA 0
400
800
1200
ng/µg DN
A
Ü p = 0.02
Control
12 weeks
A 16-‐week osteoarthri(s interven(on study in the dog ACL model
4 weeks
Anterior Cruciate Ligament sec(on (right knee)
Treatment ini0a0on
These effects are associated with a decrease in subchondral bone sclerosis.
N=40 dogs: 25, 50, 75 mg/kg/day of SrRan orally versus placebo.
* Osteoporosis Interna3onal 2012. Jean-‐Pierre Pelle(er et al.
Strontium ranelate – Rationale in OA In vivo results
• Positive effect of Strontium Ranelate on: – Macroscopic lesions of femoral condyles and tibial plateaus
– Subchondral bone thickness – COLLAGEN
Reduction of urinary CTX II in post menopausal women
* Alexandersen et al. Bone 2007 (40:219-‐222)
• Postmenopausal women phase I study – After 6 and 12 weeks of treatment with strontium ranelate 2 g/day a significant
decrease (around 40%) on the urinary CTX II levels compared to baseline was observed in 36 healthy volunteers.
• TROPOS phase III study – In 2,617 patients treated for 3 years with strontium ranelate 2 g/d or placebo*
a 15-20% urinary CTX II decrease was observed in the strontium ranelate group compared with placebo.
24 36 Months
U-‐CTX II
(% / mmol creat.)
Ü
Ü
Ü Ü Ü
0 3 6 12
90
100
110 Placebo
Stron(um ranelate 2 g
* p<0.001
Canada (259)
Australia (66)
Russia (94) UK (169)
France (73) Portugal (14)
Spain (185) Italy (103)
Belgium (115)
Germany (40)
Denmark (241) Poland (142)
Austria (57)
Estonia (29) Lithuania (9)
Romania (27)
Czech republic (44)
NETHERLANDS (16)
First Visit First Pa(ent: April 2006 Last Visit Last Pa(ent: February 2011 Study dura(on: 3 years
Worldwide study 98 centres, 18 countries - 1,683 patients included
Objec0ve: Efficacy and safety of two doses of stron(um ranelate (1 g and 2 g per day) versus placebo in reducing radiological progression of knee osteoarthri(s over 3 years
M12 M18 M24 Visits (months) M0 M6 M30 M36
Design: Interna(onal (18 countries, 98 centres), double-‐blind, placebo-‐controlled, randomised 3-‐year study
Placebo
Stron0um ranelate 2 g/day
Randomisa(on
Selec0on
N=558
N=566
N=559
Double blind treatment period
Stron0um ranelate 1 g/day
N=1683
SEKOIA study Design
Cooper et al. CMRO 2012 (28:231-‐239)
Main inclusion criteria
Caucasian males or females
Aged 50 years or over Ambulatory (able to walk unassisted)
Primary knee osteoarthri(s based on Clinical criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (Altman et al, 1986)
• Knee pain on most days of the previous month (1/2 days)
• Intensity of at least 40 mm on a VAS
• At least 3 of the followings: age >50 years, s(ffness <30 minutes, crepitus, bony tenderness, bony enlargement, no palpable warmth.
Cooper et al. CMRO 2012 (28:231-‐239)
Placebo
Stron(um ranelate 1 g
Stron(um ranelate 2 g
Stron(um ranelate 1 g -‐ placebo = 0,14 (0.04) -‐ 95%CI [0.05; 0.23] Stron(um ranelate 2 g -‐ placebo = 0,10 (0.04) -‐ 95%CI [0.02; 0.19]
-‐0.45
-‐0.40
-‐0.35
-‐0.30
-‐0.25
-‐0.20
-‐0.15
-‐0.10
-‐0.05
0
p=0.018
p<0.001
NS
(mm)
-‐0.37
-‐0.23 -‐0.27
Significantly lower JSN in both strontium ranelate groups compared with placebo
ITT = 1371 Reginster et al. Osteoporos Int (2012) 23 (Suppl 2):S57–S84, OC3
ITT N=1371
Stron0um ranelate 1 g -‐ placebo = -‐1,3 (4.0) mm Stron0um ranelate 2 g -‐ placebo = -‐8.0 (4.0) mm
-‐41
-‐52
-‐65
-‐55
-‐45
-‐35
p=0.045
NS
Placebo Stron0um ranelate 2 g
(mm)
Improvement of total WOMAC for strontium ranelate compared with placebo
-‐42
NS
Stron0um ranelate 1 g
Reginster et al. Osteoporos Int (2012) 23 (Suppl 2):S57–S84, OC3
Osteo-artrose
• Epidemiologie: grote patienten-aantallen; • Diagnostiek: discrepantie radiologie en
klachten; • Therapie: vooral symptomatisch;
• Onderzoek naar osteo-artrose is een noodzaak en een uitdaging!
Dank voor uw aandacht!
Radiological inclusion criteria
Kellgren and Lawrence grade II or III
Predominant osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee
Joint space width between 2.5 mm and 5 mm
Main exclusion criteria • Predominant osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee
• Knee prosthesis (or planned within 1 year)
• Previous surgical operation of the knee
• Secondary osteoarthritis of the knee
• Medical history of venous thrombolic events (VTE) or patients at high risk of VTE
• Progressive major illnesses
• Previous treatments likely to have an action on cartilage and bone metabolism – BPs <1 year prior to selection – Diacerein, chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine (all forms, ≥1500 mg/day),
avocado/soybean <3 months prior to selection – Treatment with anti MMPs inhibitory properties – Glucocorticoids (oral, inhaled >1500 µg/day; or intra-articular <3 months prior
to selection) Cooper et al. CMRO 2012 (28:231-‐239)
BMJ 2001
* Gensburger D, Arlot M, Sornay-‐Rendu E, Roux JP, Delmas P., Arthri3s Rheum 2009; 61(3):336-‐343
15 mm
10 mm
Automated lines
Primary endpoint for structure modifying treatment
• Radiological Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) of the medial tibio-femoral compartment of the target joint
• Central reading in Pr. R. Chapurlat center (Lyon, France) • Semi-automated validated method* • Second independent reading Pr. JY Reginster (Liège, Belgium, same method)
The key-question:
• RNG 475 (Servier): phase 2 • ANG-antibody (Amgen): phase 1 • PG 110 (Abbott): phase 1 • … Astra Zeneca