Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
(except logo’s)
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication How can libraries support changing research workflows?
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman presentatie WEB&Z, 8 december 2015
@MsPhelps@jeroenbosman
Simple cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests• replication & reproducibility• meaningful assessment• effective quality checks• credit where it is due• no fraud, plagiarism
• connected tools & platforms• no publ. size restrictions• null result publishing• speed of publication• (web)standards, IDs• semantic discovery• re-useability• versioning
open peer review •open (lab)notes •
plain language •open drafting •
open access •CC-0/BY •
good
efficient open
technical changes & standards
research governance
changes
economic & copyright
changes
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
Charters, manifestos and declarations
2003: Berlin Declaration
2012: San Francisco DORA
2015: Leiden Manifesto
2015: The Hague Declaration
2005
2010
Discovery
Analysis
WritingPublication
Out
reac
h
Assessm
ent
Database(s): scholarly communication tools
http://innoscholcomm.silk.co http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list
Survey: scholarly communication tools
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
Survey: scholarly communication tools
Survey results: Researcher profiles
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481)
Survey results: Researcher profiles
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481) Librarians (n=638)
Survey results: Altmetrics’ share
Example research workflows: traditional to experimental
Example research workflows: traditional to experimental
Add no functionality compared to print era, except online accessibility
Represent radical change, with sometimes uncertain technologies and outcomes; still under development
Use scale and linking possibilities of the internet to increase speed and efficiency
Actually change ‘the way it’s always been done’ – e.g. user-driven, different business models, changes in the sequence of research activities, shifting stakeholder roles
Compare yourself to your peer group
Open Science
y y y y yElsevier
Example research workflows:company silos / open science
Support of Open Access / Open ScienceDo you support the goal of Open Access ? Do you support the goal of Open Science ?
Yes
No
Don't know
79 %
5 %1%
17 %10 %
89 %Yes
No
Don’t know
88 %
3 %1%
9 %4 %
95 %
Medical researchers (807)
Medical librarians (313)
www.openlibmed.org
How can libraries support researchers ?
Utrecht University Library The Netherlands
Custom URL - get data from your institution
• Keuze van tools bij informatievaardigheden-onderwijs
• Ondersteunen beslissingen t.a.v. licenties
• Voorbereiden presentaties voor groepen onderzoekers
• Vergelijken eigen instelling vs. landelijk / wereldwijd
• Houding eigen onderzoekers t.a.v. Open Access/Open Science
Laat zien dat je als bibliotheek met onderzoekers meedenkt,
en niet vóór hen denkt
101innovations.wordpress.com
