Upload
stephen-graham
View
476
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Mapping Cybergeographies
Stephen Graham Newcastle University
The Myth of the “End of Geography”
• 60s-90s: Pervasive rhetoric of “death of distance”, “end of geography”, “end of cities”
• Apparently limitless and infinite mobilities • Bill Gates “Friction-free capitalism” • Virilio “Urbanization of real time” • Substitutionist and deterministic assumptions: “anything-anywhere-anytime dream”
• Dematerialisation, withdrawal from physical world: body-city-geography
• And yet a new age of cartography is emerging centred on revealing the lie to these myths:
• 1. Visualizations of Cyberspace • 2. Visualizing Cyberspace
Topologies and Flows • 3. Visualizing Cyberspace
Materialities • 4. Mapping Uneven Geographies • 5. A Geolocated World:
Animating Geographies Through GPS/Mobile/Satellites/Ubiquitous Computing
• Highly charged politics of mapping cybergeographies
1. Visualizations of Cyberspace
• Cartographic techniques which help make informational domains legible, navigable, memorable
• Widespread use of geographical and urban metaphors
• Increasing blurring of cyberspace/real space boundary
Classic ‘Virtual Reality’ Paradigm: Immersive, 3D: Marginalize the Body
Also Imaginary Geographies of Virtual Worlds
Alphaworld Virtual ‘City’
SimCity
Video Game Urban Simulations
Using Familiar Urban Cartography to Structure Online Content
Geographical Metaphors to Structure Complex Online Content
Amsterdam ‘Digital City’
Sometimes utilise
national maps
2. Visualizing Cyberspace Topologies and Flows
• Capture the connectivities of ICT systems and how the topological connections and flows of data are constructed to benefit certain interests and/or geographical areas
• Exposes extraordinarily stark and uneven geographies and hidden biases of connectivity
Online position: informational space
Topological Map of the Internet
Alt.discussion groups
Hierarchical mapping
The UK JANET Academic Backbone
Mapping 24hr Global Flows
Trace Routing
3. Visualizing Cyberspace Materialities
• Material infrastructures supporting ‘cyberspace’ generally neglected or ignored (until they fail)
• Physical and cultural invisibility • And yet they have highly uneven and important
geographies at all spatial scales: global to the urban • E.g. Manhattan has more optic fibre than Africa • Such patterns do much to reveal political, economic and
cultural geographies of power
Evolution of ARPANET
Transnational Optic Fibre Networks
Triumvirate of Dominant Capitalist Heartland Regions: N Am, Eur, E Asia
New Fibre Corridors and E-Peripheries
International Phone Traffic
and Bypassed
Zones
Satellite ‘Footprints’
Highly Uneven Urban and Regional ‘Dot.Com Geographies’: UK ‘Spikes’
Matt Zook’s US ‘Dot.Com’ Map
Zook’s Bay Area
Down Town San Francisco
Dodge’s IP Address Density Surface in London
WiFi ‘Hot Spots’
Revealing Fibre for Local Economic Promotion e.g. San Diego
Digitised Urban Simulacra
Virtual Los Angeles
Webcams: Cyberspace as Prosthetic Eyes
4. Mapping Uneven Geographies
• Mapping cybergeographies can act as proxies to reveal and visualise uneven development, divisions of labour, and geographies of social polarisation at all geographical scales: From technogeopolitics to urban social geographies
• An Examples: Technogeopolitics-- Global N-S relations
Technogeopolitics: Contrasts Global Population Density and Internet Router Density
Main Concentrations of Domain Names
Postcolonial Techno Geopolitics of Connectivity
Cartograms to Demonstrate Who Dominates Web Growth: 2007
2015 (projected)
5. Geolocated Worlds: Animating
Geographies Through GPS/
Mobile/ Ubiquitous Computing
• Eg Amsterdam Realtime project 2002
• Seehttp://www.interactivearchitecture.org/amsterdam-realtime-waag-society.html
Google Earth/Google Maps: Covergence of Geolocation/ Remote Sensing/ Virtual reality/ Photography/Navigation
Produces Active Mash-Ups as “New Spatial Media”
These Co-exist With Growing Sophistication and Commercialisation of Parallel, Online Worlds
Conclusions • New age of cartography revealing the lie of cyberutopian
or dystopian rhetoric of the death of geography or distance through real-time
• Shift from geographical metaphors to help make cyberspace navigable, to sophisticated mapping of the geographical bases and materialities that sustain ‘cyberspace’
• Blurring real/virtual boundaries • As with all cartography, these representations biased and
politicised, but very revealing • Shit towards dynamic, animated, cartographies generated
by everyday mobilities