Upload
comms-connect
View
472
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Historically, professional two-way radio has dealt with the problem of congested spectrum/channels by narrowing the channel spacing, i.e. 50 kHz -> 25 kHz -> 12.5 kHz -> 6.25 kHz, but with new technologies emerging and vast advancements in spectral efficiency Paul Daigneault asks if this is really necessary and, more importantly, is there still room for linking narrowband PMR sites in the digital world? This presentation considers the narrowband two-way radio technologies at present and weighs up options of the old FDMA analog network versus its newer digital 'successor'. Paul Daigneault, CEO, MiMOMax Wireless
Citation preview
www.mimomax.com 1
Presentation Title: Is there still room for linking narrowband PMR sites in the digital world? Speaker: Paul Daigneault
@CommsConnectAus #comms2014 COMMS CONNECT 2014
www.mimomax.com 2
Ø IP: The Very Basics Ø The Problem Space Ø Uncovering the Myths about PMR Linking Ø Examples of What Can be Achieved Ø Summary & Conclusion
Presentation Outline UHF PMR Linking ?
www.mimomax.com 3
Interfacing at Audio Level
Traditional Analogue Remote PMR Linking
4 wire E+M
Link Radio UHF
PMR Radio VHF
4 wire E+M
Link Radio UHF
PMR Radio VHF
STA 4800- Or Other Audio Mux
4 wire E+M
1200 bd Modem RS232
www.mimomax.com 4
Why The Golden Spectrum
Power Density Inversely Proportional to Distance
Path Loss Inversely Proportional to Frequency
Dp α 1/r2
www.mimomax.com 5
Golden Spectrum
Golden Spectrum
Everyone Wants it !
www.mimomax.com 6
Why The Golden Spectrum
Advantage of UHF Path Loss Propagation Characteristics Compact Antennas
(Relatively Wide Beam Widths)
• Relatively Low – Rain Fade, Cloud Cover – Foliage
• Direct & Some ( N-Los) – Reflected / Refracted – Diffracted – Scattered
• Relatively Compact – Towers Often Not Required – Low Install & Maint. Costs – Less Sites
www.mimomax.com 7
Very Non Line of Sight UHF Path
7
www.mimomax.com 8
Then Came Digital PMR
Digital PMR Promised: Ø Better Clearer Audio Ø Security ( Encryption Options) Ø Coverage Improvements ( For Some)
Ø Spectrally Efficiency Improvements
www.mimomax.com 9
Digital PMR Standards/Segments
Markets
Public Safety Mission Critical
Professional Business Critical
Commercial & Light Industrial
Vertical Market Segments
Emergency Services Public Transportation Public Services Airports/ Ports Local Govt Transportation Mining Petro-Chemical Public Utilities Manufacturing Taxi/Hire Car Construction Event Mangmt Private Security Warehousing Retail Agriculture Hospitality Recreational
Digital Radio Standards
ETSI TIA Tetra APCO P25 Licensed Licensed Trunked Conv &Trunked ETSI DMR Tier 3 Licensed -Trunked DMR Tier 2 Licensed Conventional ETSI Other On-Site DMR Tier 1 Unlicensed dPMR Tier 1 Unlicensed
PD /2007
www.mimomax.com 10
The Internet Protocol (IP)
Ø From: IP over Everything Ø To: Everything over IP
(including linking of PMR sites)
– IP Very Basics : IP Delivers Datagrams ( Packets) from Host to Destination across one or more IP networks. For this purpose IP defines an Addressing Scheme that has two purposes; (IPV4) – Identifying Hosts – Providing a Logical Location Service
www.mimomax.com 11
The Internet Protocol (IP)
Each datagram has two components, a Header and a Payload IP header is tagged with the source IP address, destination IP address, and other meta-data needed to route and deliver the datagram The payload is the data to be transported
www.mimomax.com 12
IP Reliability? • Network Infrastructure is Inherently Classed as Unreliable at any
Element with No Central Monitoring. The Internet Protocol only Provides Best Effort Delivery!
• The Lack of Reliability Permits Various Error Conditions, Such as Data Corruption, Packet loss and Duplication, as Well as “out-of-order Packet Delivery.
• Intelligence in the Network is Purposely mostly Located in the End Nodes. (End to End Principle.. build reliable networks from unreliable parts)
• Requires Boundary Buffers to Absorb short term Arrival Fluctuations
• Upper Layer Protocols are Responsible for Resolving Reliability Issues
www.mimomax.com 13
The Problem ?
The Nesting of Data Payloads in a Packet with a Header is called Encapsulation.
Typical P25 Voice Payload Ethernet Encapsulated.
Dramatic Perceived Increase in Bandwidth Requirement
www.mimomax.com 14
Some Typical Examples?
Manufacturer – Tait – Motorola – DAMM – Hytera
Throughput + Management
• 600kb/s 5 Channels P25/DMR • 625kb/s 5 Channels P25/DMR • Typ 780kb/s For 7+1Tetra • 250kb/s for 4 Channels DMR
Typical Throughput Requirements of 80-125kb/ Channel incl Management However not unusual to see B/W requirements over specified x 5-10 times.
www.mimomax.com 15
Critical Attributes of PMR Linking
Issues for Management Ø Delay (Latency) Ø Variation in Delay (Jitter) Ø Packet Loss Ø Late Packet Arrival Ø Availability / Reliability Ø Low Throughput
www.mimomax.com 16
P25 System Latency
End to End Latency <150ms
Ethernet Ethernet
Call Set up & Vocoder Latency
Max Linking Latency <40ms
Base Station Latency
Network Latency Conventional
Simulcast Trunked TIA102CAAB-C
P25 CAI
www.mimomax.com 17
17
The Problem / P25/ DMR Payload
Issues • Latency
• Jitter
• Dropped Packets
• Out of Order Delivery
• Errors
• Low Throughput
Impacts on PMR • Shoot /Don’t Shoot
• Audio Quality
• Audio or Call Set Up
• Discarded so Delay
• Some Audio Quality
• Audio Quality
www.mimomax.com 18
18
The Problem / P25/ DMR Payload PMR Traffic Considerations • System Architecture • Voice Traffic • SIP Traffic • Syslog Traffic/ Alarms • FTP • Reports and Etc…..
• All Competing for the Same Highway!
www.mimomax.com 19
Two Philosophies ? 1. More Is Better Throughput Focus
• Big Fat Pipes ! (For RF this Means B/W) – Lowers Latency ! – Spectrum is Wasted! ( But Cheap?) – Delivery Still Not Guaranteed !
• Big Boundary Buffers – Excessive Delay, Complex AQM Systems.
• Complex FEC Schemes – Loss of Capacity
• Interleaving and Blind Resending – Excessive Delay Packet Loss and Packet Late Arrival
www.mimomax.com 20
20
Wide Band IP Pipe ?
More is Better?
Voice ( DATA) Packets
Reports Software Upgrades
SIP FTP Syslog Logs Misc
Generously over-provisioning a network so that capacity is based on peak traffic load estimates
64k-100Kb/s per Audio Channel?
+ 100k-200Kb/s System
Management
Rule of Thumb From PMR
Manufacturers
Contingency 50% to 200%
+100Kb/s Logs Reports etc
Assumed Result: A Wide Band Radio Pipe is Required for Reliable Low Latency Communications
Say 800kb/s -1.5Mb/s for 5+1 Trunked
Channels
www.mimomax.com 21
21
Key Message !
“Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction”
• Telecoms:- Complexity Must not Reduce Reliability • Design:- Better is the Enemy of Good • Quality:- Fit for Purpose
Back to the 3C’s Cost Coverage and Capacity
www.mimomax.com 22
2) Be Smart
……Fat Pipes Means Basics are Often Forgotten ! ………One of the Big Advantages of Digital Radio was
……………..Spectral Efficiency
a) Radio Throughput b) Capacity Accelerators c) Traffic Management
• Spectrum • Spectral Efficiency • Spatial Efficiency
• Header Duplication • Payload Duplication • Latency Focus
• Efficient FEC • Fragmented QoS • Traffic Classification
www.mimomax.com 23
a) Radio Throughput • Spectrum (Licensed) • Spectral Efficiency • Spatial Efficiency
Modulation
12.5 kHz (Est)
25 kHz (Actual)
50 kHz (Est)
QPSK 80 kbps 160 kb/s 320 kbps 16 - QAM 160 kbps 320 kb/s 640 kbps 64 - QAM 240 kbps 480 kb/s 960 kbps
256 - QAM 320 kbps 640 kb/s 1280 kbps
Full Duplex Aggregate MiMO Raw Data Rate
• High Order QAM • Full FDD Duplex • MiMO 2 x2
• Use as Little as Possible • Match to Application • Use Spatial Diversity
www.mimomax.com 24
24
M-DAP - MiMOMax Phase I P25 Coding
• Digital voice, 4400 bits/sec
• Channel signaling, 2400 bits/sec
• Error correction, 2800 bits/sec
Composite signal, 9600 b/s
www.mimomax.com 25
25
M-DAP – P25 I & II / DMR Voice Coding
This Phase II represents a 2-to-1 improvement in capacity over the
existing 7200 bps Full-Rate IMBE™
Digital Radio
Vocoder FEC Total Voice
+Channel Signalling
Total
Phase I 4400bps 2800bps 7200bps 2400bps 9600bps Phase II DMR
2450bps 1150bps 3600bps 2400bps 1200bps
6000bps 4800bps
Two Slot TDMA so 12kb/s / 9k6b/s P25/DMR / Base Station
www.mimomax.com 26
b) Capacity Accelerators • Eliminate Duplication in Header
• Eliminate Duplication in Payload • Do it Damn Fast
• Header Duplication • Payload Duplication • Latency Focus
Ethernet IP UDP RTP Voice CRC
14 bytes 24 bytes 8 bytes 14 bytes ~20 bytes 4 bytes
Becomes:
Compression header
Voice payload CRC
3 bytes ~ 20 bytes 4 bytes
Voice Payload Already Heavily Compressed.
www.mimomax.com 27
c) Smart Network for PMR
……Fat Pipes Means Basics are Being Forgotten ! ………To Fine Tune and Control a (Wireless) Network Delay, Jitter, Packet Loss & Bandwidth Requirements need to be Understood for Each and Every Protocol and Service. Eg Control Class Service Type Delay Jitter Pkt Loss Bandwidth Control, Call Set Up 10ms <1ms <1% 5kb/s Real time, Voice and Data X X X 4k8-9k6 Priority, Data X X X X Best Effort, Reports & Logs 2mins N/A <5% X
www.mimomax.com 28
28
By Understanding How to Prioritize Network Traffic Based on Class of Service (CoS) it is Possible to “Right Size” and Provide Superior End to End Connectivity
Managed IP Pipe Un Managed
Voice ( DATA) Packets
Reports Software Upgrades
SIP FTP Syslog Logs Misc Priority 2
Priority 1
High
Best Efforts
Managed
www.mimomax.com 29
1.5Mb/s Link 500kHz B/W Managed Data
SW Down Load
www.mimomax.com 30
M-DAP
SW Down Load
25kHz QAM16 MiMOMax M-DAP
www.mimomax.com 31
What Seriously Smart Technology Can Do?
www.mimomax.com 32
UHF MiMO Path 320kb/s Aggregate
32
www.mimomax.com 35
Summary? • Narrowband Licensed Smart Radios have a Unique Place in PMR
Linking. By Using;
• A) Ultra Spectrally Efficient Radios – Provides Right Bandwidth for Application
• B ) Capacity Accelerators – Intelligent Compression Schemes
• C) Traffic Management – Control of Delay, Packet Loss and Packet Late Arrival – Very Small Boundary Buffers Simple AQM Systems
• Spectrum Use is Optimised! – UHF is Very Viable for Long Path Med Density Digital PMR. – Costs are Minimised
www.mimomax.com 36
The Plug (IP Linking with MiMOMax)
– All Moving to IP Linking Schemes
“Operating the links at 16QAM, we managed to achieve data throughput in excess of 129 Kbps The customer was very excited about and network latency through multiple link hops which was well under our expected results. The demonstration of the MDAP feature was particularly important. We tested the link at maximum capacity and all P25 traffic was transported without any packet loss or artefacts of any kind. I will certainly be recommending MiMOMax as a fast, reliable and easy linking solution and hope to work with you again in the near future.” Kind regards Ryan McCabe Tait Customer Engineer
www.mimomax.com 37
Questions?
www.mimomax.com 38
www.comms-connect.com.au
Conference materials available soon at
COMMS CONNECT 2014 @CommsConnectAus #comms2014