48
MEMBANGUN INDUSTRI PROBIOTIK : PROSPEKTIF PROBIOTIK SEBAGAI FEED ADDITIVES PADA INDUSTRI PETERNAKAN DI INDONESIA PUSAT TEKNOLOGI AGROINDUSTRI BPPT 2016

Presentasi Prospektif Probiotik KTN 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

MEMBANGUN INDUSTRI PROBIOTIK :

PROSPEKTIF PROBIOTIK SEBAGAI FEED ADDITIVES

PADA INDUSTRI PETERNAKAN DI INDONESIA

PUSAT TEKNOLOGI AGROINDUSTRI – BPPT

2016

OUTLINES

Peta Industri Peternakan

Prospek Probiotik

Market challange

Konsep probiotik

Teknologi produksi probiotik

Produk dan aplikasi probiotik BPPT

Business plan C-Xanthoprobiotik

Penutup

Sumber : Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan 2015 http://ditjennak.pertanian.go.id

Peta Industri Peternakan

Budi Tangendjaja, 2015

AMIS - IRIAP

1,09

2,04

Budi Tangendjaja, 2015

AMIS - IRIAP

Seminar: “Potret Bisnis Unggas 2015

dan Prediksi Bisnis Tahun 2016”

Jakarta, 18 November 2016

87,5 T

Thom Wright and Sugiarti M.

USDA Staff

Indonesia Grain and Annual Feed Report, 2016

Grain Report Number ID1610

3,4

6kg/h

Ban AGP UEA 2006

Ban AGP USA 2010

Ban AGP Ind 20…?

Alternatif Ab

Konsep Probiotik

Probiotik luar negeri :

• Yea Sac : Alltech USA

• CYC : Korea

• Lactosan : Austria

• Diamond : Inggris

• Trillac : Australia

Probiotik Produk BPPT 2006 :

• PSC-G2 : sapi potong

• PSC-G21 : sapi perah

• Mikrosil : pembuatan silase

• Prochick : ayam pedaging

• Komposil : pengolah limbah

UU No 18/2009 ps 22

PP No ...? April / 20...?

Prospek Probiotik

Market challange

Drh. Endah Widiastuti dan Usman Ali

PELARANGAN PENGGUNAAN HORMON TERTENTUDAN/ATAU

ANTIBIOTIK SEBAGAI IMBUHAN PAKAN

Senin, 15 Desember 2014

DIREKTORAT PAKAN TERNAK

Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan

Kementerian Pertanian Indonesia

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Quantity Value

Additive

Rice Bran

PMM

Fish Meal

MBM

SBM

Corn

Seminar: “Potret Bisnis Unggas 2015

dan diolah lebih lanjut

Feed : 14,580,000,000 kg

3 % : 437,400,000 kg

10 % : 43,740,000 kg

1 kg : 50,000 IDR Rp/kg

AGP : 2,187,000,000,000 IDR Rp Prob GP 30 % : 656,000,000,000 IDR Rp

Konsep Probiotik

1974 : Parker

“ Organisms and substances which contribute to intestinal

microbial balance”

1989 : Fuller

“ Live microbial food/feed supplement which beneficially

affects the host by improving its intestinal microbial balance”

Probiotics mean “for life” and are defined as : “ living microorganisms which upon ingestion in certain numbers exert health benefits in humans and animals beyond inherent basic nutrition ”

2002 : FAO / WHO

M. Elie Metchnikoff

Nobel Prize winner

1845 - 1916

Henry Tissier

1906

Diare anak miskin Bifido

Anak sehat kaya Bifido

Bacillus bifidus communis

Rekomendasi terapi Bifido

Alfred Nissle 1917

Escherichia coli galur

Nissle 1917

Petani Bulagria susu yoghurt – umur panjang

Keracunan mikrobiota usus “replacing with LAB”

Eksperimen susu fermentasi Bacillus bulgaria

The prolongation of life 1907 Nobel Prize

Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus

The scientific rationale for the health benefit of LAB

Lactobacillus casei Shirota

Minoru Shirota

1921

Probiotics mean “for life” and are defined as : “ living microorganisms which upon ingestion in certain numbers exert health benefits in humans and animals beyond inherent basic nutrition ”

2002 : FAO / WHO

Probiotics Health benefits are derived from specific strains of

bacteria with proven clinical efficacy

Studies are showing the health status of the host is as important to

probiotic efficacy as the microbial strain

Combination of different probiotics strains reduces the ability of

potentially pathogenic bacteria to adhere to and colonize the gut

more than single strains, thus reducing risk of infection

Gambar. 2. (a) mikrograf elektron

Scanning dinding dinding usus halus ayam menunjukkan lactobacilli

menempel ke permukaan

(b) Scanning mikrografi elektron

wilayah oesophagus dari lambung

babi menunjukkan streptokokus dan

lactobacilli melekat pada sel epitel

Gambar. 3. (a) mikrograf elektron Scanning potongan dinding usus

halus ayam menunjukkan lactobacilli menempel ke permukaan

(b) Scanning mikrografi

Bagan saluran pH bakteri

pencernaan ayam

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Nov. 2003, p. 6816–6824 Vol. 69, No. 11

Our studies showed that the feed additive S. cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 may accelerate the development

of the functionality of the rumen ecosystem, by creating more favourable ecological conditions for

earlier establishment of cellulolytic bacteria and ciliate protozoa in the rumen of newborn lambs. Other

studies including more animals should be undertaken to conŽrm this tendency. If so, this microbial additive

could be a useful tool to optimize the rumen function of young ruminants and to avoid digestive

disorders during weaning. This work also demonstrated that an allochtonous microorganism, such as a

probiotic yeast can affect the development and the activities of autochtonous microbes in a complex

ecosystem.

Teknologi Produksi Probiotik

500 T Y-1

62,50 T M-1

4 1 %

16 Run M-1

2 D R-1

TAHUN 2005 2006 2018 2017 2016 2007

RISET DAN

PENGEM -

BANGAN

TEKNOLOGI

PRODUK

PASAR

INDUSTRI PROBIOTIK DAN PETERNAKAN

PSc

G1

PSc G1,2,3 = Probiotik Ruminansia ; ProChick = Probiotik Unggas

MIKROBA PROBIOTIK PSc DAN ProChick

HASIL REKOMBINAN DNA

SELEKSI

GALUR

MIKROBA

END

TRAPING FREEZE

DRYING

OPTIMASI MEDIA DAN

FORMULASI PRODUK

SPRAY

DRYING

PEMULIAAN GALUR

MIKROBA

TRANSFORMASI GEN, UJI

INVITRO & INVIVO

ISOLASI GEN

POTENSIAL

TEKNOLOGI

REKOMBINAN DNA

PSc

G4

PSc

G2

PSc

G3

TAHUN 2005 2006 2007

RISET DAN

PENGEM -

BANGAN

TEKNOLOGI

PRODUK

PASAR

INDUSTRI PROBIOTIK DAN PETERNAKAN INDUSTRI PROBIOTIK DAN PETERNAKAN

PSc

G1

PSc

G1

PSc G1,2,3 = Probiotik Ruminansia ; ProChick = Probiotik Unggas PSc G1,2,3 = Probiotik Ruminansia ; ProChick = Probiotik Unggas

MIKROBA PROBIOTIK PSc DAN ProChick

HASIL REKOMBINAN DNA

MIKROBA PROBIOTIK PSc DAN ProChick

HASIL REKOMBINAN DNA

SELEKSI

GALUR

MIKROBA

END

TRAPING

END

TRAPING FREEZE

DRYING

FREEZE

DRYING

OPTIMASI MEDIA DAN

FORMULASI PRODUK

OPTIMASI MEDIA DAN

FORMULASI PRODUK

SPRAY

DRYING

SPRAY

DRYING

PEMULIAAN GALUR

MIKROBA

TRANSFORMASI GEN, UJI

INVITRO & INVIVO

ISOLASI GEN

POTENSIAL

TEKNOLOGI

REKOMBINAN DNA

TEKNOLOGI

REKOMBINAN DNA

PSc

G4

PSc

G4

PSc

G2

PSc

G2

PSc

G3

PSc

G3

Produk dan Aplikasi Probiotik BPPT

1 2

3 4

Mikrosil

Probiotik PSc Fermentasi Harvesting

Uji In-Vivo

Uji In-Vitro

Mikroba Probiotik Produksi Silase

Konsentrat - Probiotik PSc

Total mikroba hidup* ……………… tidak kurang dari ………………1,25 x 1012 CFU/gram(*Saccharomyces cerevisiae dan Bifidobacterium bifidum)

MANFAAT: Menciptakan keseimbangan mikroflora dalam saluran pencernaansehingga meningkatkan proses pencernaan bahan pakan, penyerapan zat nutrisi, daya tahan infeksi saluran pencernaan, dan meningkatkan produksi daging

KANDUNGAN BAHAN: Sukrosa, susu skim, produk kering fermentasi Saccharomycescerevisiae dan Bifidobacterium bifidum, Soybean meal, vitamin dan mineral

DOSIS:Sapi/Kerbau : 0,5 gram per ekor per hariKambing/domba : 0,1 gram per ekor per hari

PETUNJUK PEMAKAIAN:

Larutkan 0,5 gram atau satu sendok takar PSc JiTu ke dalam 20 ml larutan gula

cair/molases 0,5% dan campurkan larutan ke dalam 2 kg bahan pakan konsentrat(polard, dedak atau onggok), aduk hingga merata, kemudian campurkan ke dalam

pakan konsentrat keseluruhan.

PENYIMPANAN: Tutup rapat kemasan, simpan ditempat yang sejuk dan kering,

hindarkan dari panas sinar matahari langsung.

PSc JiTuProbiotik Ruminansia

BERAT BERSIH: 250 GRAM

Diproduksi Oleh:

Balai Pengkajian Bioteknologi BPPT, Kawasan PUSPIPTEK, Tangerang

Telp: 021-7560562 ext. 1549,1542 Fax: 021-7560208

E-mail: [email protected]

PRODUK PROBIOTIK - BPPT

PSc (untuk sapi, kambing)

MikroSIL (pembuatan Silase)

ProCHICK (untuk ayam)

Probiotik PSc G1

Probiotik PSc G2

APLIKASI PROBIOTIK PSc

DATA HASIL UJI PROBIOTIK PERIODE TAHUN 2005 - 2006

No Sampel Sapi Uji

ADG

(gram/ekor/hari) Delta

(gr/hr)

Hari

DOF

Jml

sapi

Benefit

(kg)

Waktu

Pengujian

PSc Kontrol

1 Sapi PO I 770 780 -10 120

200 -120

Maret-Juni

2005

2 Sapi PO II 740 710 30 120

560

1.008

Okt 2005 -

Jan 2006

3 Sapi Australia CC I 1660 1710 -50 70

400 -700

Juli – Agst

2005

4 Sapi Australia CC II 1470 1410 60 70

600

1.260

Juni-Juli

2006

5 Sapi Australia CC III 1500 1420 80 70

990

2.772

Juni-Juli

2006

97.6% 423.7 gr/ekor

94.3% 534.1 gr/ekor

97.6% 433.9 gr/ekor 1.5

2.1

Perlakuan

Jumlah (ekor) Mortalitas

(%)

Total konsumsi pakan (kg)

Rata-rata konsumsi

pakan (kg/ekor)

Rata-rata berat

badan (kg/ekor)

FCR (Feed

Convertion Ratio)

awal mati akhir

Kontrol 2.500 133 2.367 5,32 6.984 2,95 1,53 1,93

Prochick 2.500 78 2.422 3,12 6.515 2,69 1,65 1,63

Gb. 10. kandang sistem litter kapasitas kandang 3000 ekor; Gb. 11. Sekam ayam organik

tidak berbau; Gb.12. Karkas ayam organik, rendah lemak dan kholesterol

2016

2017

2018

• Pengembangan produksi prob cur-

x liquid skala pilot plan 75 – 500 L

• Trial field prob cur-x skala

komersial

• Fasilitas produksi

komersial probiotik cur-

x dan ayam probiotik

• Pengembangan produksi prob

cur-x liquid skala pilot plan 2500 L

• Pengembangan produksi prob

cur-x powder skala pilot plan 75 –

500 kg

Inovasi Probiotik Cur-x Trial produksi prob cur-x Trial field prob cur-x Development prob cur-x

Investasi

Business Plan Probiotik Cur-x

2009 - 2014

160 kL

16 T 16 T Y-1

2 T M-1

0,2 1 %

10 Run M-1

3 D R-1

160 KL Y-1

20 KL M-1

10 eq 2 K L

10 Run M-1

3 D R-1

Forcast Market share Probiotik dari Populasi Ternak di Indonesia

Jenis Ternak Tahun Real Closed Feed Duration T-Feed Dosis Revenue 25 %

Revenue

(ribuan) 2015 1,000 Kg Hari Kg 0.03% 1,000 25%

S. Perah 525 525 3 90 141,750 43 42,525 10,631

S. Potong 15,494 15,494 6 90 8,366,760 2,510 2,510,028 627,507

Kambing 18,880 18,880 0.5 90 849,600 255 254,880 63,720

Domba 16,510 16,510 0.5 90 742,950 223 222,885 55,721

Babi 8,044 8,044 1 90 723,960 217 217,188 54,297

A.Buras 285,021 285,021 0.2 18 1,026,076 308 307,823 76,956

A. Petelur 151,419 151,419 0.2 18 545,108 164 163,533 40,883

A. Pedaging 1,497,626 1,497,626 0.2 18 5,391,454 1,617 1,617,436 404,359

Itik 46,875 46,875 0.2 18 168,750 51 50,625 12,656

0.1% 17,956,408 5,387 5,386,922 1,346,731

17,956 5.39 5,386,922 1,346,731

ton ton Ribu

Rupiah

Ribu

Rupiah

Forcast market share Probiotik from Feedmill Industry

Feedmill Ind. Thousand ton Closed

0.10% Ton 0.03%

Poultry 13,680 13.680 13,680 4.10

Ruminan 152 0.152 152 0.05

Swine 304 0.304 304 0.09

4.24 Ton

Rev. 4,240.80 M

30 % Rev. 1,272.24 M

Total Market Size :

99,938 L

Rp.4,996,900,000

Forecast Market Probiotik Liquid

Probiotik/kg 1,052,622 F-2500

Probiotik/ton pakan 315,787 pakan/ton F-2500

Probiotik/kg pakan 316 pakan/kg F-2500

Probiotik/kg pakan 91 pakan/kg F-10.000

Perbandingan harga Probiotik/kg skala pilot dan industri

Harga AGP : 50 – 150 rupiah

Rp15.79/dosis

126

6.32

Rp4.55/dosis

Perah Potong Domba Unggas Biaya/hr B/C

5 632 5.70

8 1,011 4.75

0.5 63 29.69

0.2 25 23.75

Daily Feed

Rasion (Kg/day)

Rp.126/kg

Perah Potong Domba Unggas Biaya/hr B/C5 1,579 2.28

8 2,526 1.90

0.5 158 11.88

0.2 63 9.50

Daily Feed

Rasion (Kg/day)

Rp.316/kg

•Y-Generation

•Pemerintah

•Lembaga Riset

•Masyarakat

Feed mill

Feed additive

Food industri

Farm industri

Stake Holder Industri Probiotik

Probiotik telah dipelajari secara intensif dan dieksplorasi komersial

dalam beragam produk yang berbeda

Probiotik mempunyai efek menguntungkan untuk kesehatan ternak

Peran probiotik mencegah diare, terapi antibiotic, dan terapi immun/alergi/

Imflamasi dengan cara kolonisasi resisten mikroba pathogen dan

menekan pertumbuhannya serta memodulasi sistem immun pencernaan

Probiotik utama : Lactobacillus dan Bifidobacterium, probiotik

potensial : Enterococcus, Propionibacterium, Saccharomyces,

Streptococcus thermophilus, Pediococcus dan Lactococcus

Perkembangan teknologi memperluas aplikasi probiotik dalam

industri feed additive untuk peternakan dan dapat untuk substitusi

antibiotic growth promoter (AGP)

Penutup

Daftar Pustaka

1. Bruno Biavati. Probiotics and Prebiotics. Traditional food in combating foodborne pathogens. Department of

Agro-environmental Science and Technologies, Fac. Of Agriculture. University of Bologna, Italy. 2011

2. C.A. Patterson, PhD, Pag. Probiotics Benefits beyond basic nutrition August 2008. Agriculture and Agri-Food

Canada. 1341 Baseline Rd., Tower 5, 2nd Floor. Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C5.

3. Camila Boaventura, Rafael Azevedo, Ana Uetanabaro, Jacques Nicoli and Luis Gustavo Braga. The Benefits of

Probiotics in Human and Animal Nutrition. New Advances in the Basic and Clinical Gastroenterology.

www.intechopen.com

4. Carlos Ricardo Soccol, Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe, Michele Rigon Spier, Adriane Bianchi Pedroni

Medeiros, Caroline Tiemi Yamaguishi, Juliano De Dea Lindner, Ashok Pandey and Vanete Thomaz-Soccol. The

Potential of Probiotics: A Review. C.R. SOCCOL et al.: The Potential of Probiotics, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 48

(4) 413–434 (2010)

5. Francisco Guarner (Chair, Spain), Aamir G. Khan (Pakistan), James Garisch (South Africa), Rami Eliakim

(Israel), Alfred Gangl (Austria), Alan Thomson (Canada), Justus Krabshuis (France), dan Ton Le Mair (The

Netherlands). Probiotics and prebiotics. World Gastroenterology Organisation Practice Guideline. 2008 May.

6. H. Tissier, The treatment of intestinal infections by the method of transformation of bacterial intestinal flora, C.

R. Soc. Biol. 60 (1906) 359–361 (in French).

7. Hesham A. El Enshasy . Industrial Platform Design for Large Scale Production of Probiotic Yeast. Institute of

Bioproduct Development (IBD), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru, Malaysia

8. http://www.customprobiotics.com/about_probiotics_continued.htm

9. Nicolae Corcionivoschi, Dan Drinceanu, Ioan Mircea, Deirdre Stack, Lavinia Ştef, Călin Julean, Billy Bourke.

REVIEW : The Effect of Probiotics on Animal Health. Corcionivoschi N. et. Al./Scientific Papers: Animal Science

and Biotechnologies, 2010, 43 (1)

10. R. FULLER. A Review Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 1989, 66, 365-378

11. S.C. Ng., MRCP., A.L. Hart, PhD, M.A. Kamm, MD, A.J. Stagg, PhD, and S.C. Knight, PhD. BASIC SCIENCE

REVIEW : Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics: Recent Advances. Inflamm Bowel Dis. Volume 15, Number 2,

February 2009

PROBIOTICS: Probiotics are defined as ‘living micro–organism that, upon ingestion in certain numbers, exerts health benefits beyond inherent basic nutrition’ [12]. Their use as powder or granulate formulations is linked to proven efficacy on the gastrointestinal microflora. This positive effect on the gastrointestinal flora results not only in an improved health status, especially in young animals, but also in improved animal performance, including growth rate and/or feed conversion efficiency. There are different categories of probiotic feed preparations: Additives containing about 1010 CFU g–1, premixes containing 108 CFU g–1, and feeds, meals or pellets containing about 106 CFU g–1 [13]. Microorganisms that are used in animal feeds in the EU are mainly Gram–positive bacteria belonging to the families Bacillus (B. cereus var toyoi, B. licheniformis; B. subtilis), Enterocococcus (E. faecium), Lactobacillus (L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. farciminis, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus), Pediococcus (P. acidilactici), Streptococcus (S. infantarius). Lactic acid–producing bacteria are used in a large variety of fermented feed applications.

Probiotics strain Dose and design research Result References

Bactocell probiotic

Pediococcus acidilactici

109 cfu g-1

Dosis 0,8 g , 1 g , 1,6 g per kg

feed rasion

800 DOC Ross broiler chicks

42 days, PCV Blood, Hb, total

protein, albumin, total lipid, ,

cholesterol

PCV, Hb, TP, TL, albumin no significant

change Cholesterol significant

decrease BW and DWG significant

increase (3-6 W)

1 & 0,8 g kg-1 FR higher BW (6 W)

Alkhalf, A. et al.

Saudi Journal of Biological

Sciences (2010) 17, 219–225

www.ksu.edu.sa

www.sciencedirect.com

Probiotic

Enterococcus faecium,

Lactobacillus casei and

Lactobacillus plantarum

Bacillus subtilis

106 - 108 cfu g-1

Fertilized eggs

10 mg probiotic solution in water

Probiotic in diet DOC Chicks

Challenged with Salmonella

enteritis at hatching

Probiotic provided caecum reduction

of Salmonella enteritidis from the

second week of life.

The probiotic promoted elimination of

Salmonella enteritidis in the crop and in

the caecum of the chicks at 7 and 21

days of age.

Leandro, N.S.M., et al.

R. Bras. Zootec., v.39, n.7,

p.1509-1516, 2010

S. cereviseae 103 cfu kg-1, 105 cfu kg-1

107 cfu kg-1 feed diet

Percent weight gain (PWG) and

Feeding efficiency (FE) of

Epinephelus coioides

S. cereviseae 107 cfu kg-1 had

significantly higher survival rates than

those fed the 103 cfu kg-1, S. cereviseae

diet and control diet after challenge

with Streptococcus sp and iridovirus,

with increased survival rates of 26,6 %

and 36,6 %, respectively, compare to

the challenge control group.

S. cereviseae 107 cfu kg-1 had

significantly increased PWG and FE

which were 211,6 % and 1,2.

Chiu-Hsia Chiu, et al.

Fish & Shellfish Immunology 29

(2010) 1053-1059 ELSEVIER

ScienceDirect

www.elsevier.com/locate/fsi

S.cereviseae and Lactid acid

bacteria

S.cereviseae and Lactid acid

bacteria as potensial mycotoxin

decontaminating agents

S.cereviseae action was binding

mycotoxin

Shetty, P.H. and Jespersen, L.

Trends in Food Science &

Technology 17 (2006) 48-55

Effect of Cyclodextrin

Complexation of

Curcumin on its Solubility

and Antiangiogenic and

Anti-inflammatory

Activity in Rat Colitis

Model

Solubility, phase

solubility, and in vitro

dissolution studies

showed that curcumin

has higher affinity for

hydroxypropyl-β-CD

(HPβCD) than other CDs.

HPβCD complex of

curcumin was further

investigated for its

antiangiogenic and anti-

inflammatory activity

using chick embryo and

rat colitis model.

HPβCD complex of

curcumin proved to be a

potent angioinhibitory

compound, as

demonstrated by

inhibition of angiogenesis

in chorioallantoic

membrane assay.

Curcumin- and HPβCD-

treated rats showed a

faster weight gain

compared to dextran

sulfate solution (DSS)

controls.

Yadav, V.R., et al.

AAPS PharmSciTech, Vol.

10, No. 3, September

2009

Nutrition Research Reviews (2000),

13, 279-299

Antibiotic use in animal feed and

its impact on human health :

Lincomycin, Virginiamycin

Erythromycin, tylosin, kitasamycin,

oleandomycin, spiramycin

Monensin, lasolocid, narasin,

salinomycin

Bacitracin,

Carbadox, olaquindox

Inhibit protein synthesis in Gram-

positive bacteria

Inhibit protein synthesis, principally

in Gram-positive bacteria

Affect bacterial cell permeability;

active against Gram-positive

bacteria

Gram-positive cell-wall synthesis,

Inhibit bacterial DNA synthesis and

denature pre-existing DNA; active

against anaerobes

Antibiotic-resistant human

pathogens are a major challenge

in human medicine (Collignon,

1997; Turnidge, 1998; Williams &

Heymann, 1998; Guillemot, 1999).

There is some risk that excessive

attention to transfer of antibiotic-

resistant bacteria or genes from

animals to man will divert attention

from the need to address problems

inherent in the medical use of

antibiotics. Antibiotic-resistance

problems in human medicine

include those of MRSA, VRE,

multiresistant Mycobacterium

tuberculosis, penicillin-resistant

pneumococci, multiresistant

Gram-negative organisms and

extended-spectrum b-lactamase-

producing Gram-negative

bacteria (Gold & Moellering, 1996;

Collignon, 1997).

Centrifugal cells separator