Citation preview
()
,
. : (, 2019) .
.
2019 .
3.1 ‘’ ‘’()
1910 ( 1920 ) ()
: , , , 1920.
73 3.1
1. ‘’
3.1
.
, ‘’ 3.1
.
‘’
‘’
. ‘’
.
‘’(, ) .
.
1970
.1
,
. ‘ ’
.
. ()
.
(colonizer) (the colonized)
.
.
1 ‘’ , , 8, 1976, 23; , , 15, 1978, 117~124 .
74 21
.
.
.
, ‘’, ‘ ’
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
‘
’ .
() .
.
. ‘ ’
.2
2 . ,
: , , 2004, 3~4.
75 3.1
3.1
.
.
.
.3
. ()
,
.
.
2000 .
()
. , ,
.
.4
3 1910
.
.
4 Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in
Korea, 1876~1945, Harvard University Asia Center, 2011.
76 21
3.1
(Peter Duus) .
.5
‘() ’(Settler colonialism) .
‘() ’
.
.
,
.6
‘
’ .
.
. ‘ ’
. 3.1 . ,
‘() ’
5 Peter Duus, The Abacus and the Sword: the Japanese Penetration of
Korea, 1895~1910, University of California Press, 1995.
6 Settler colonialism Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire, p. 18;
Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen, “Introduction,” Caroline Elkins
and Susan Pedersen eds., Settler Colonialism in the Twentieth
Century: Projects, Practices, Legacies, New York: Routledge, 2005
.
77 3.1
.7
. 3.1 100
3.1
.8
1920
.
.
3.1
.9 1920
‘’(
) .
.
3.1 .
3.1
.10
3.1 1
7 ‘() ’
,
. , ,
. ‘(
) ’ . Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen, “Introduction”, p.
18.
8 3.1 3.1
. 31100 , 3.1
100, , 2019. 9 , , 92, , 2005.
10 , “ ” (1920~1929), 19, 2018; 3.1 100 4, 2019.
78 21
.11 3.1
1 .
3.1
.
.
. 3.1
. 3.1
.
3.1
‘’() .
‘’ 3.1
‘’()
.12 ‘’
‘’ .
.
3.1 “
” .
‘’
. ‘
’ 3.1
11 3.1 .
, 3.1 1919 , 39,
2015. 12 ‘’ , : 1910~1945, , 1984,
3 .
.
? 30~40
.
, ‘’()
.
‘’
.13 ‘’ “
,
, ‘’ ” , “
‘’
” .
‘’ .
‘’
. ‘’
.14
‘ ’ .
‘’ “
” .15
13 , : , , 1987, 275~276.
14 , : , , 1990, 42~45.
15 , , , 2012, 85.
80 21
.
. . ‘’
.16 ‘
’
.17 ‘’
‘’
.18
3.1 ‘’
. 1870
1910 ‘’ 17
.
16 , : , , 2008, 48~49.
17 .
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
18 ‘’ , : , , 2019 .
81 3.1
.19 3.1
‘’ .
(1919 3 4) 5 ‘’
,
. 3.1
‘’
.
3.1
() .20 3 1
3.1 . 2
() ()
.21
3.1
3 6.
‘’() 3 . ‘
1 ( )
’
19 1910 1920 .
‘’
, 2
.
20
. 1919 12 .
21 , , 1919 3 2().
82 21
) “
”
.22
,
.
3
.23 3.1 ‘’(), ‘’(), ‘’()
‘’(), ‘’(), ‘’, ‘
’() . ‘’()
‘’()
.
“ ”, “
”, “ 20 ”(3 6 ), “()
”, “ ”(3 7 ), “ :
”(3 8), “
1 ”(3 8 ), “ ”, “
”(3 10 ), “ ”(3 12
), “ ”(3 13 ), “ ”(3 14 ), “
”, “ 3 ”, “
22 , , 1919 3 6().
23 .
< 1> 1919 3 6()
83 3.1
”(3 16 ), “ 2 ”(3
27) .
. (
) 3
. 24
60 .25
.
.
2
.26 () ()
280 .27
3
.
.
.
, ,
.
.
.
24 , , 1919 3 6().
25 , , 1919 3 7().
26 , , 1919 3 6().
27 , , 1919 3 7(); ,
, 1919 3 8.
.28
.29
‘’
. 50
,
()
.30
.31
32 33
.
. ()
()
() .34
28 . ,
3.1(), 2014; ,
3.1(), 2015. 29 , , 1919 3 16().
30 , , 1919 4, 13~14.
31 : , , 1919 3 8().
32 ……, , 1919 4 2().
33 , 3.1(), 2014, 47.
34 , , 1919 3 12; : , , 1919 3 12().
85 3.1
.35
.
.36
3.1
.
37
.38
.
.39 3 1 “
”
.40
3 5
,
.41 ‘’
.
3.1 .
‘ ’() ‘ ’(
) ‘’ .42
35 , , 1919 3 19(); , , 1919 3 28.
36 , 3.1(), 2015, 52.
37 () .
38 .
. ()
“ ”
. , , 1919 3 10().
39 (), 1919 3 1, 3 5, 4 10, 7 1.
40 (), 1919 3 1.
41 , 1919 3 5.
42 , , 1919 4; , , 1919 4; , , 1919 5; .
86 21
.43
.
‘’
‘’ . ()
() “
. []
.”
.44 3 27
“ ” .45
()
“ ” ()
.46
() . ()
“ ”
“ ”()
.47 “
”,
.
3.1
.
‘’
43 , , 1919 3 20.
44 , 2.
46 , 59.
?
.
. ()
.48
1
.
1910 ‘’ “
() ”
.
“ ” , “ ”
.49
‘’ .
.
()
3.1 .50 ()
.51
.
.
. (
48 , , 1919 3 6.
49 , , 1919 3 7.
50 , , 1919 3 12().
51 , , 1919 3 14().
88 21
”
.53
.54 3.1
.
.
() () (
) ‘’()
“ [] .
”
.55
() . 3.1
“[
]
”
.56 ‘’
“
” .
52 , , 1919 3 12.
53 , 1919 3 11(), () 3 18 .
54 : , 73, 1919 4, 2~6.
55 , , 1919 3 17.
56 , , 1919 3 17(). , , 1919 4, 23~24 .
89 3.1
.
.
() “
”
“
” .57
‘’
.
.
()
‘’
. ‘ ’
.
. 10
.
…
.
.
.58
,
57 , 225, 1919 4, 22.
58 , , 1919 4, 16.
90 21
3.1
.
.
“ ”
.59 ‘’
‘’
“[]
” .60
‘’ ‘’
.
()
.61
. ‘’ ()
.
. 1919 9 ()
‘’ .
59 , 16~17.
91 3.1
‘’
.
5 ‘’
. ()
“ ()
” ,
3.1
.62
.
. ()
‘’
.63
.
.64
‘’
. 3.1
.
‘’
62 , , 1919 6, 3.
63 , , 1919 6, 32~33.
64
, . , 2~10.
92 21
,
.65
‘’
. ‘’
.
‘’ .66
.
() () “
[3.1] ” .67
‘’ .
‘’(,
) .
() “
” .68
. “()
” “
() ” .69
65 1920 8~10
. , , , 1920 .
66 , 2~10 , , 1919 7, 5~7 .
67 (), 77, 1919
8, 60.
69 , 3.
.
“ ‘’
” ‘’
.71
.
, 3
,
.72
.
, ,
.73
. ‘’
‘’ “
” , “
, , ” ‘’
.74 ‘’
70 : , , 1919 5, 28.
71 , 59.
72 , 8.
73 , 8.
74 , 7.
94 21
.
10 ‘’(
) .75
‘’
.76
.77
3.1
.
“
” .
‘’ ‘’
. (
)
“ ‘’
” .78
.
. “
” “
” “ ()
” .79
75 , , , 1920. 76 , 14~15; , , 133~135.
77 , 4.
79 , 29, 31.
.
“
” .80
“ ”
“ , 150
” .81 3.1
‘’ .
3.1 1
. ‘’
‘’
. ‘’ ‘
’
. ‘’()
. (),
(), ()
.82
‘’
.83 3.1
5 6
,
80 , 52.
83 () 1( )
8 , ()(1), , 1964 .
96 21
.
.
. 20
.
‘’
. “
”
.
‘’
.
.
“ ” “
” . ()
.
.
5.
3.1 ‘’
.
‘’
.
3.1 ‘’
‘’ .
97 3.1
. ‘’
.
. ‘’
.
.
.
3.1 ‘’
.
‘’ .
,
.
‘’ ‘’
.
‘’
.
3.1 ,
.
307
, , 4, , 1969.
, (1929), 2, , 1963.
, , , 1983.
, , , 1990.
, , , 1921.
3.1: ‘’ ‘’()
|
, “ ” (1920~1929), 19, 2018.
, 3.1(I), 2014.
, 3.1(II), 2015.
, , , 1920.
, : , , 2019.
, ·, 92,
, 2005.
, , , 1920.
()1~4( ).
, , 1928.
Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in
Korea, 1876~1945, Harvard University
Asia Center, 2011.
, : ,
27, 2010.
, 3.1 , 62, , 2003.
, · (1914.8~1918.6) , 87, 2016.
, 1910~1945, , 1984.
312 21
, .
,
.
,
, .
: , , , , ,
3.1: ‘’ ‘’()
|
: 2019. 6. 8 | : 2019. 6. 20 | : 2019. 7. 8
, ‘’
3.1 . 3.1 ‘’
.
‘ ’ .
3.1 ‘’ ‘‘
.
. ’‘
. ‘’
. ‘’
.
.
3.1 ‘’
. ‘’ ‘
’ . ‘’
.
3.1
.
() 3.1 |
: 2019. 5. 22 | : 2019. 6. 9 | : 2019. 7. 3
3.1 .
,
. , 3.1
3.1
.
316 21
colonialism of Chosun and Taiwan. They emphasized the need of
policies in consideration of the interests of Chosun and Taiwan,
while insisting on stopping assimilationism and employing autonomy
as a governance policy. Their interest was naturally directed
toward the expansion of the two colonies’ self-governance, but they
showed deviations in the extent of self-governance that should be
allowed in its implementation. Also with regard to representative
institutions, they all acknowledged that the establishment of
colonial parliament is more valid than having colonial
representatives participate in the Imperial Diet, but they differed
in the timing and regional feasibility of the establishment of the
Chosun Parliament and the Taiwan Parliament. • Keywords: colonial
policy studies, assimilationism, autonomy, Yamamoto Miono, Izumi
Akira,
Yanaihara Tadao
the March First Movement and Japanese settlers in colonial
Korea
| YEE Donghoon This article examines how Japanese settlers reacted
to and perceived the March First Movement. To consider Japanese
settlers’ perception towards the March First Movement, the paper
analyzes the initial reaction and the fixed perception after time
lapse. This study also focuses on Japanese settlers’ consciousness
which had been cultivated and shared in the Japanese
community.
Just after the March First Movement, most Japanese settlers looked
down on and ridiculed the independence movement. They believed that
Korean rioters misunderstood the national self-determination
principle due to their ignorance about international affairs.
Regarding the causes of the incident, they did not consider the
cruel military government rule in the 1910s and Japanese settlers’
discriminatory behavior.
For the perception towards the March First Movement, a difference
between Japanese in homeland and settlers in colonial Korea is
recognized. Contrary to Japanese in homeland, Japanese settlers’
consciousness had been formed by encountering and contacting with
the colonized. Therefore, Japanese settlers’ perception on Koreans
was exclusive and closed towards Korean society. On the basis of
this chauvinism, Japanese settlers insisted on imposing strong
measures against Koreans after the March First Movement. •
Keywords: the March First Movement, Japanese settler, colonizer,
settler colonialism
the March First Movement in the Kokumin shinbun | PARK Eun-Young
The March First Movement was an event that aroused the attention of
the Japanese media community, which had been indifferent to Chosun
for a long time. Most of the newspapers at that time were dragged
into the situation by reporting the announcements of the government
and the military, or posting editorials of the same purpose.
Instead of conveying the reality of Chosun enough, the articles of
exciting titles decorated the pages. This article focuses on the
media characteristics that were not of interest in previous studies
and examines
3. 1
3. 2
3. 3
3. 4