A Distributed Security Framework for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks Presented by Drew...

A Distributed Security Framework for

Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks

Presented by Drew Wichmann

Paper by Himali Saxena, Chunyu Ai, Marco Valero,

Yingshu Li, Raheem Beyah

1

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) Security

• Applications

• Attacks– Sinkhole– Wormhole– DoS– Jamming– Sybil– Hello Flood

• Defense Mechanisms2

Memory Constraints

• Mica2 mote– 4KB RAM– 128KB program memory

• 60KB for Operating System• 45.26KB Code Dissemination Tool• 7.2KB Link Layer Security

• 88% of memory consumed

3

Proposal

• Distributed Security Framework (DSF) which can detect and defend against all known attacks efficiently

• A warning mechanism can inform other clusters to install defense mechanisms for potential attacks in advance, thus reducing the impact caused by attacks

• The security framework is modular and scalable, thus defense mechanisms for new or future attacks can be easily added

4

Assumptions

• Base station and Gateway nodes tamper proof

• Attacker has regular node capabilities

• Those within transmission range are at higher risk

• Gateway Nodes have enough memory to store all defense schemes

• No false positives

5

Network Model

• Heterogeneous Network– Gateway Nodes– Regular Nodes

• Divide into clusters

• Communication– Gateway nodes

require only single hop

– Regular nodes use multi-hop to communicate with gateway nodes

6

Threat Model

• Two scenarios for attack

– Single cluster

– Multiple clusters

• The attacker can change position

• A compromised node has all material available

7

Problem Definition

• Goal– Significantly reduce an attack’s effectiveness

• There are a set of attacks, A = {A1 , A2 , … , An }• For every attack Ai , there exists a defense scheme Di• For every defense scheme Di , the program size is Pi• Each regular node has an available program memory of

– Can only store a subset S of D8

n

iiR PP

1

Problem Definition (continued)

• Assign weight Wji to an attack Ai for a gateway node Gj• Wji represents the possibility of the attack Ai occurring in Gj• Knapsack Problem:

9

DSwherePPtoSubject

W

RSDi

Sji

i

,

MaximizeiD

DSF ARCHITECTURE

The security framework to efficiently defend against all known attacks

10

Routing Protocol

• Gateway nodes calculate routes for each pair

• Regular nodes periodically send current state

• If reports are not received on time, then the regular node is assumed dead

• Gateway level uses Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV)

11

Choosing the Defense Mechanism Subset

12

DSwherePPtoSubject

W

RSDi

Sji

i

,

MaximizeiD

Warning Messages

• When an attack is detected, send a warning Wk• Wk = { Ai , Gs , WWk , Tk }• Each gateway node maintains a received warning list Lj• Keeps one entry per (Ai , Gs)• Then the likelihood of each attack is calculated

13

ijk ALW kcjs

kji TTGGD

WWW

isattack and ,

Propagate the subset

• Solve:

• Send the new defense mechanism images for S• Use Seluge to transmit the images

• Protects this cluster from new attacks

• With the warning system, can enable defense of future attacks in other clusters

14

DSwherePPtoSubject

W

RSDi

Sji

i

,

MaximizeiD

Security Framework Workings

15

Performance Analysis

• Parameters:

• Metrics– Success Rate– Energy Consumption

16

Performance Analysis

• Three schemes– Distributed Security Framework (DSF)– One Security Scheme (OSS)– Multiple Security Schemes (MSS)

17

Success Rate

18

Success Rate

19

Energy Use

20

Energy Use

21

Effect of Mobile Attacker Speed

22

Conclusion

• Dynamically use available memory to provide security from multiple attacks

• Warning scheme can enable prevention of future attacks

• Simulation results confirm DSF performs well

• Future work– Individual sensor subsets– Gateway node compromising– False positives and negatives– Implementation on real sensors– Thrashing Attacks

23

Questions?