View
61
Download
5
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
seepage through dam seminar report
Citation preview
1
1. INTRODUCTION
As water can flow easily through interconnected pores in soil media, soil is
permeable. Flow occurs from high energy point to low energy point. Depending on
the pore size the flow may be steady or unsteady, laminar or turbulent. For simplicity
the flow is generally considered as laminar and steady flow. The study of flow of
water through soil is necessary for estimating the quantity of underground seepage
under various hydraulic conditions, for investigating problems involving the pumping
of water for underground construction, for obtaining the amount of seepage or
leakage below the dam, the uplift pressure caused by the water on the base of the
concrete dam, and the possibility of danger of a quick or liquefaction condition at
points where seepage water comes to the ground surface.
1.1 Bernoulli’s Equation
According to Bernoulli’s Equation the total head (energy per unit weight) at a point in
water under motion can be given by the following equation-
where = total head ; = pressure ; v = velocity ; = gravitational acceleration ; =
unit weight of water ; = elevation of a point above or below the datum level.
Generally seepage velocity is very
small such that its contribution to the
total head is very less or negligible.
Hence total head may be presented
as –
Now as per the fig the head loss
between A and B may be written as-
1.2 Darcy’s Law
The pores of most soils are so small that flow of water through them is laminar.
However in coarse soils flow of water may be turbulent. The pore channels of a soil
mass are so narrow and tortuous, so irregular in cross section that exact analysis of
the flow through individual pores is very cumbersome. But flow through the individual
pores is not our interest. Instead we are interested in combined or overall flow
2
through all pores of an
element of volume which is
sufficiently large to give a
typical representation of the
soil mass as a whole.
Consider an element with
cross section and length
, the element is inclined at an angle to the horizontal; inflows and outflows only
occurs at two ends. The following forces are acting on the element-
1. Force on the left hand face and the right hand face due to water pressure.
2. Gravitational force equal to times the volume of water.
3. Frictional force due to viscosity.
Resolving the forces in the direction of L,
Where, is effective porosity.Substituting
and rearranging
Darcy’s experiments showed that for low velocities, the resisting force is proportional
to the velocity ; for mathematical convenience this is written as
, where
is dynamic viscosity, is the intrinsic permeability of the porous material. Hence,
, where k is the hydraulic conductivity defined as
.
This equation is known as Darcy’s law. In soil mechanics the word permeability is
often used as an alternative of hydraulic conductivity.
Now discharge,
. Here in the previous equation is total cross-sectional
area of the soil mass,across which the discharge occurs and is the superficial
velocity or apparent velocity. Hence careful distinction between the superficial
velocity and the seepage velocity vs is important. The discharge may be written as
, where area of void , porosity.
The range of validity of Darcy’s Law has been studied by several investigators.
Arough but satisfactory criterion of the limit of applicability of Darcy’s Law, given by
3
Fancher, Lewis, and Barnes is
i.e. Reynolds number 1
Where, = superficial velocity ; diameter of the sphere which has a volume equal
to the quotient of the volume of solids of a sample and the number of grains in the
sample.
1.3 Stream function & velocity potential
An element of fluid (control volume) is shown in the above figure. At the centre of the
element the density is , and the velocity has components , and . Now we are
considering the flow in each direction separately. represents the x-component of
mass rate of flow per unit area at the centre of the element. Hence on the right face
and on the left face
Here we are neglecting the higher order terms of Taylor series expansion. Now net
rate of mass outflow in the x direction
Similarly net ret mass outflow in y direction
andin z direction
Now change of mass of the control volume due to change in the density=
4
Now from the above discussion we can conclude that the differential equation of
conservation of mass is
Here we concern with steady flow (i.e.
) and incompressible flow (i.e. =
constant). Hence the above equation simplifies to the following equation
The above equation is applicable for both steady and unsteady flow of
incompressible fluid. Now for two dimensional flow the equation becomes
Now we have two variables, u and v, to deal with. Now if we define a function ψ(x,y),
called the stream function which relates the two components of velocity as shown
below
and
then the continuity equation is identically satisfied. In this way we have simplified the
analysis by having to determine only one unknown function, , rather than the
two functions, and .
If we move from a point to neighborhood point , the change in
the value of is as follows
Along a line of constant we have , so that v.dx + u.dy = 0 and, therefore,
along a line of constant ,
,which is the defining equation for a streamline.
5
Thus we can conclude that lines along which is
constant are streamlines. Hence if we know the
function , we can plot lines of constant to
provide the family of streamlines that are helpful in
visualizing the pattern of flow.
Consider two closely spaced streamlines, shown in the
figure of previous page. Let represents the volume
rate of flow (per unit width perpendicular to the x-y
plane) passing between the two stream lines. From
conservation of mass we can conclude that
Thus volume rate of flow, q, between two streamlines such as , can be
determined as
Hence the relative value of with respect to determines the direction of flow as
shown in the figure at right to the page.
Now many flows have negligible or zero vorticity and are called irrotational flow.
For threedimensional irrotational flow curlV = 0.
Now if we define a scalar function such that
so
that the above equations are identically satisfied. Here φ is called the velocity
potential which is applicable for irrotational flow only.
Now along a constant φ line for two dimensional flow
. Hence
From the above equations we can conclude that equipotential lines (φ lines) are
orthogonal to the stream lines( lines). For any potential flow field a “flow net ” can
be drawn that consists of a family of streamlines and equipotential lines.
1.4 Khosla’s Theory
Bligh’s theory states that water creeps along the bottom contour of the structure
which fails to describe actual phenomenon of seepage. Khosla’s theory, a more
6
appropriate theory, can be
summarized as follows
a) Water seeps
through subsoil
along a set of
stream lines. This
steady seepage in
a vertical plane for
an isotropic soil
can be expressed
by Laplacian
equation which will
be discussed in
section 2.1.3.the first streamline follows the bottom contour of the structure as
stated in Bligh’s theory. The remaining streamlines follows smooth transition
curves as shown in the above figure by deep firm line. The dotted lines are
equipotential lines.
b) The seepage water exerts force at each point in the direction of flow and
tangential to the flow. This force has an upward component where the
streamlines turn upward. For the soil grains to remain stable the upward force
must be nullified by the submerged weight of soil grains. Since the direction of
streamline at the exit is vertical, the force has maximum disturbing tendency
at the exit. The disturbing force at any point is proportional to the gradient of
total head or rate of head loss. The gradient of total head of water at the exit
is known as exit gradient. The exit gradient should be below a typical limit
such that the upward force will be nullified by the submerged weight of soil.
2. FUNDAMENTALS OF SEEPAGE
In general flow through an earth mass is a three dimensional phenomenon. To
simplify the analysis it can best be shown by using the simple two dimensional case.
Two assumptions made in seepage analysis are that Darcy’s law is valid and that the
soil is homogeneous.
2.1 Concept of flow-net
Flow net is a graphical representation of flow through soil. The path which a water
particle follows during seepage through a saturated soil mass is called flow line or
stream line which has been already discussed in the earlier section. Now we will
discuss various aspects of flow nets.
2.1.1 Boundary conditions
7
If fixed conditions is retained at all points of the boundary of a typical cross sections
of a soil mass, the flow net is uniquely determined, i.e. one and only one solution can
exists. If the boundary conditions were to be slightly disturbed or changed, a certain
time would be required for flow to readjust itself to a steady state. A long interval of
time may be elapsed before a steady state is attained if the soil is highly impervious
and very compressible. The expression of boundary conditions consists of statement
of head or flow conditions at all boundary points. The following figure illustrate this
concept:
The boundary conditions of the above figure are completely defined by four following
statements:
1. Line AB is an equi-potential line along which head equals ht.
2. Line CD is an equi-potential line along which head equals zero if we take CD
as datum level.
3. From point A, which touches the piling at the surface of the soil, a line
following the impervious surface of the pile down one side to E and then up on
the other side to C is a flow line.
4. The line FG, including its extension to both right and left is a flow line.
2.1.2 Square figures
Previous figure shows that the figures formed by adjacent pairs of flow and
equipotential lines, figure J1K1M1N1 for example, and resemble squares. All four
corners of each such figure form right angles and the mean distances between
opposite faces are alike.Although this does not constitute a square according to the
strict meaning of the word, it may be noted that if such a figure is subdivided into four
figures and then is further subdivided, there is an approach toward true squares.
Thus the use of a very large number of closely spaced lines would truly give
7
8
squares, and in flow net analysis the term square figures has come into common use
for figures of the sizes commonly used.The significance behind the use of square
figures is very important, and it will now be demonstrated.
For two-dimensional flow Darcy’s law may be written as
Where, y is the dimension of the soil mass in the direction normal to the section.
Designating
by q and by b, and defining q as the discharge per running
meter (i.e. per meter normal to the section) and b as the trace of the area gives the
form
This equation may be used to express the discharge through any figure of a flow net.
In the section 2.1.1 the figures J1K1M1N1 and J2K2M2N2 are arbitrarily chosen as any
two figures of the net, and J’K’M’N’, which is bounded by same flow lines as the first
figure and by the same equipotential lines as the second figure, is used as an
auxiliary figure. Darcy’s law for the discharge through any figure may be written
Where represents the head loss in crossing the figure, and dimensions b and
are illustrated in the figure of section 2.1.1. The expressions in this form for each
three figures under consideration are
The value of k is the same for all figures and, since the three figures which are being
analyzed are squares, the ratios,
,
and
are all equal to unity.Since the auxiliary
square has thesame flow line boundaries as the first square, . Since it has
the same equipotential boundaries as the second square, . Hence from
the previous three equations we can write that and .
Thus it is seen that when all figures are squares there must be the same quantity of
flow through each figure and the same head drop in crossing each figure. It follows
9
that flows between adjacent pairs of flow lines are alike throughout and potential
differences between successive equipotential lines are alike throughout.
2.1.3 The Laplace Equations
From Darcy’s law we can write
and
.From continuity
equation in two dimensional flow we can write
. No combining these
three equation we can write
Now for isotropic soil, , which results the following conclusion
For square figure, , which results the following conclusion
These above to equations are the Laplacians of conjugate variables, and
.These equations present the fundamental relationships for steady flow based on
Darcy’s Law in isotropic soils, and states simply that the sum of the components of
space rates of gradient change must be zero. In other words, gradient changes in
the x direction must be balanced by gradient changes of opposite sign in the z
direction if the volume is to remain constant.
2.1.4 Scale transformation in account to stratification
However in many practical situations stratification exists. The demonstration which
follows shows that the use of a simple scale transformation leads to a distorted plot
on which the flow net principles can be applied in case of stratification. In the
previous section we have derived the following relationship
This equation may be written as
If is defined as a new coordinate variable, measured in the same direction as x
and equal to x multiplied by a constant, as expressed by
10
then it can be written as
This equation is a Laplacian in the coordinate variables and . Thus, if a cross
section through stratified soil is drawn to distorted scale, the true z scale and the
transformed scale being used for coordinates, the flow net may be sketched on it.
It should be noted that, in the above treatment, the direction is defined as the
direction of maximum permeability. In the majority of cases this direction will be
horizontal, but when the maximum permeability is in a diagonal direction the axis
and the transformed or axis must be taken in this diagonal direction.
2.2 Determination of Quantity of Seepage
The quantity of seepage may easily be determined once the flow net is available.
The expression of discharge through any square is
The number of flow paths and the number of equipotential dropsalong each path
may be counted on any flow net; these numbers will be designated, respectively, by
and .Since all paths have same amount of flow and all potential drops are equal,
total seepage, and total head dissipated, .The substitution of
these two expressions into that above leads to
The seepage for any given cross section equals the product of three quantities - a
constant which depends only on the geometry of the crosssection, the effective
permeability of the soil, and the head dissipated in passing through the section.
11
Now if the section is
transformed as discussed in
the section 2.1.4, when the
above equation is used for a
transformed section, the
value that applies for
permeability may be
explained by the following
simple demonstration.
Let be the effective permeability for the transformed section. Now flow through the
transformed square shown in the figure is
.
But in case of natural scale flow through the second figure is
.Now
equating the two expressions we can conclude that effective permeability for the
transformed figure, .
Hence the rate of seepage per unit width can be calculated from the following
equation
3. SEEPAGETHROUGH DAM
The main purpose of dam is to reserve water for irrigation, water supply,
hydroelectric power generation, flood control etc. An initial classification of dams
based on the construction material is shown as follows-
Embankment dams are older and simpler in structural concept than early masonry
dams. It utilizes locally available materials. But concrete dams are more demanding
in relation to the foundation condition though advanced and expensive construction
Dams
Embankment dams
Earth fill Rock fill
Concrete dams (including masonry dams)
Gravity Arch Buttress Multiple arch
12
skills are required.The effect of seepage is to be considered properly to avoid poor
design. Generally the boundary conditions related to the seepage through the
pervious soil strata beneath the dam structure. But in case of earth fill dam seepage
also occurs through the dam and the uppermost flow line is not readily found out,
thus introducing complication. This upper flow line is free water surface which is
known as line of seepage.
3.1 General considerations of earthen dam
For simplicity we are considering a homogeneous earthen dam as shown in the
above figure. In this case the top flow line or the line of seepage is the flow line
connecting the point B and rock toe. We will discuss how to find out this top flow
line in the next section. The top flow line must obey the following three conditions-
a) As the top flow line is at atmospheric pressure the only type of head can exist
along it is elevation head. Hence, from the properties of square figures as
discussed in section 2.1.2 we can say that there must be constant elevation
drop between the points at which successive equipotentials meet the top flow
line as shown below.
b) Upstream slope( AB) is an equipotential line. So the top flow line must be
normal to the upstream slope at the starting point as shown below.In the second
figure the coarse material at the upstream is so pervious that it does not offer
appreciable resistance to flow. Hence the upstreamequipotential line is the
downstream boundary of coarse material. The top flow
12
13
line cannot be normal to the equipotential line as it cannot rise.
c) In the downstream end the top flow line tends to follow the direction of gravity as
shown below.
The second figure shows a vertical exit condition into a rockfill toe.
3.2 Solution of horizontal under-drainage or Parabolic case
The constituents of flow net i.e. flow lines and equipotential lines are curves resulted
from two conjugate functions - and
. These conjugate functions can be
represented by nests of confocal parabolas. The following figure (a) shows the
general properties of any parabola.
14
In figure (b) all curves are parabolas with the common focus F. A cross section for
which such a flow net holds rigorously is given in figure (c).
Here BC and DF are flow lines, and BD and FC are equipotential lines. The
upstream equipotential line is unusual for a homogeneous dam with underdrainage
filter.
The commonest case of upstream equipotential boundary is shown in figure (d). The
flow net for this section will not consist of true parabolas, but there will be close
similarity with them in the downstream portion. The top flow line is close to parabola
except for a short distance of reversed curvature near point B. If we extend this
parabola to the upstream water surface it will intersect the surface at point A.Arthur
Casagrande found that AB equals approximately times BE for dams with
reasonably flat upstream slopes. Here F is the common focus for all parabolas. The
short section of reversed curvature starting at point B may be sketched by eye. Let
focal distance FA be . From figure (a) for any point on the parabola D having co-
ordinate , , which implies the following relation
15
Now for point A of figure (d), and , which leads to the following
relationship
The distance can be obtained by graphical construction. From the properties of
parabola we can say that FC = and FG = KJ = . Now when the points C,G,A,B
are located the top flow line can be easily traced out. As FG = , head at G is equal to
. Now the flow net of the region GCFH has and total head, . From
the expression of quantity of total seepage discussed in the section 2.2 we can say
that
3.3 Correction to parabolic case for sloping discharge face
Here the slope of discharge face is designated as α, measured clockwise from
horizontal. Thus the underdrainage case is defined by an α of 180 degrees. The
sketches of flow nets for the downstream portions of dams with α values of
and are shown below.
Here the intersection of bottom flow line with the discharge face has been used as
focus to give the parabolas shown by the dotted lines in these above figures. In each
sketch the top flow line is in close agreement with the parabola except for a short
final portion of its path. Here is the distance between the parabola and the actual
breakout point measured along the discharge face. The distance between actual
breakout point and focus is designated as . The values of /( ) are noted
oneach figure. Figure (d) is based on these values and other values from flow nets
not shown. In the figure (d) the value of /( ) for any slope of or more.
16
Now to determine the top flow line graphically for homogeneous dam resting on an
impervious foundation the following steps are to be followed-
a) The section should be drawn in with proper scale factor.
b) Sketch the top flow line parabola with its focus at the breakout point of the
bottom flow line as discussed in the section 3.2.
c) For dams with flat slopes, this parabola will be correct for the central portion of
the top flow line. The portion of the top flow line at entry is sketched visually to
meet the boundary condition there i.e., the perpendicularity with the upstream
face,which is a boundary equipotential and the tangentiality with the base
parabola.
d) The ratio /( ) can be found out from the graph by knowing the slope
of discharge face.
e) The necessary correction at the downstream end may be made by knowing
the values of and ( ).
3.4 The L. Cassagrande solution for a triangular dam
For triangular dams on impervious foundations with discharge faces at 90° or less to
the horizontal L. Casagrandegives a simple and reasonably accurate solution for the
top flow line as shown in the following discussions.
In the following figure the top flow line actually starts at B. Applying the entrance
correction as discussed in section 3.2 we have found the point A as an
assumedinitial point. We have to find the distance of break out point C of top flow
line which is designated as . Here is the vertical distance from the foundation level
and is thedistance measured along the top flow line. As along the top flow line the
only head isthe elevation head, gradient at any point is
16
17
The followings are the two assumptions made in this method –
a) The distance GH is equal to its vertical projection i.e. the coordinate of point
G.
b) Gradient at point G of top flow line i.e. is the average gradient for
all points of equipotential line GH.
No flow per unit width across the equipotential line GH is
At point C the gradient equal , and equals . Thus flow through
equipotential line CF becomes
Now equating above two equations we get
Now at point A, is equal to and is assumed to be zero. The distance along top
flow line from A to D is designated as in the figure. Thus at point C is equal to
and is equal to Now integrating the above equation from A to C we
can get
17
18
By substituting the approximate value of i.e. we can get the final equation
Once the value of has been determined the discharge, q can be easily determined
from the equation This theory can give good result for varies from
to For angle the error occurs due to the assumptions becomes
large and this method is not normally used.
3.5 Schaffernak and Iterson’s solution
If downstream slope, the distance can be found out using Schaffernak and
Iterson’s method as shown below.
Shcaffernak and Iterson (1917) assumed the energy gradient as or
Now flow per unit width through vertical section EJ is given by
But and .
So,
Now integrating between the limits to and to
19
Once the value of has been determined the discharge, q can be easily determined
from the equation
3.6 Flow net patterns for concrete dams
Some flow net patterns are shown below for a concrete dam resting on an isotropic
soil with or without cut-off wall. The first one is with no cut-off walls, the second with
cut-off wall at the heel as well as at the toe,the third with cut off-wall at the heel only,
the fourth with cut-off wall at the toe only and thefifth is with upstream impervious
blanket. It is to be noted that the effect of cut-off walls is to reduce the under
seepage, the uplift pressure on the underside of thedam and also the hydraulic
gradient at the exit, called the exit gradient as discussed in section 1.4.
20
4. FILTER REQUIREMENTS
Due to seepage the fine particles are washed out i.e. erosion occurs and the pores
of coarse grains are clogged due to which seepage force is increased. Hence coarse
material of proper size is required which is called filter material such that these
problems can be eliminated. So the filter material should fulfill the following
conditions- (a) the size of the voids in the filter material should be small enough to
hold the larger particles of the protected material in place, and (b) the filter material
should have a high hydraulic conductivity to prevent large seepage forces and
hydraulic pressure in the filters.
21
Terzaghi and Peck (1948) provided the following to satisfy the first condition
And to satisfy the second condition i.e. condition (b) they gave the following condition
Where diameter through which 15% of filter material will pass;
diameter through which 15% of soil to be protected will pass;
diameter through which 85% of soil to be protected will pass.
The figure shown below simplifies the use of these two equations. Let the material
used in construction of earth dam has the grain size distribution curve . From the
curve we can determine and and plot them as shown in the figure.
The acceptable grain-size distribution of the filter material will have to lie in the
shaded zone.
5. DRAINAGE GALLERY
Seepage exists within every dam. We can only control and direct it. In embankment
dams it is controlled by suitably located pervious zones as discussed in the section
4. In case of concrete dam vertical drains are formed inside the upstream face, and
seepage pressure is relieved into an internal gallery or outlet drain. In the case of
22
arch dams, seepage pressures in the rock
abutments are frequently relieved by
systems of bored drains and tunnels.
Water seeping through the dam is directed
from several small collectors into main
drainage gallery. The gallery also serves to
give access for inspection purposes, to
monitor the behavior of dam, to carry out the
remedial work if required.
6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
Seepage has very bad effect like erosion, piping failure, instability of structures etc.
But we cannot eleminate seepage. We can only direct it by providing easiest path so
that it cannot harm the structure. There are various methods available to measure
the seepage analytically and empirically. We have to choose the suitable method.
23
7. REFERENCES
1. Das, B. M., and Sobhan, K. (2014). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering.
2. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., Mesri, G. (1996). Soil Mechanics in Engineering
Practice.
3. Casagrande, A. (1937). Seepage Through Dams.
4. Munson, B., R., Okiishi, T., H., Huebsch, W., W., Rothmayer, A., P., (2013).
Fundamentals Of Fluid Mechanics.
5. Novak, P., Moffat, A., I., B., Nalluri, C., Narayanan, R., (2007). Hydraulic
structures.
6. Garg, S., K., (2013), Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulic Structures.
7. Knappett, J., A., Craig, R., F., (2012). Craig’s Soil Mechanics.
8. Taylor, D., W., (1948). Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics.
9. Arora, K., R., (2004). Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
10. Venkatramaiah, C., (2006). Geotechnical Engineering.
Recommended