325
Науковий журнал В В І І С С Н Н И И К К Х Х м м е е л л ь ь н н и и ц ц ь ь к к о о г г о о н н а а ц ц і і о о н н а а л л ь ь н н о о г г о о у у н н і і в в е е р р с с и и т т е е т т у у Е Е к к о о н н о о м м і і ч ч н н і і н н а а у у к к и и Т Т о о м м 2 2 Хмельницький 2011

Вісник ХНУ №5, Т.2., 2011

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Вісник ХНУ №5, Т.2., 2011.

Citation preview

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    1

    22

    2011

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    2

    19.01.2006 2-05/1 (. 22006 .)

    1997 . 6

    , 2011, 5, . 2 (180)

    : ( 2005 . , . )

    . ., , . . ., , , ,

    . ., . . ., ,

    . ., , . . ., , , , , -

    . .,

    . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . .

    : . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . - . .

    , 1 30.08.2011

    :

    , 29016, . , . , 11,

    (03822) 2-51-08

    e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

    web: http://library.tup.km.ua/visnyk_tup.htm http://visniktup.narod.ru http://vestnik.ho.com.ua

    .

    9721 29 2005 ()

    , 2011

    , 2011

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    3

    -

    . . , . .

    ......... 7

    . .

    ....................................................................................................................................................... 10

    . . , . . , . .

    ................................... 15

    . .

    , ...................... 19

    . . , . .

    ................................................................................................................... 21

    . . , . .

    : ................................................................................................ 25

    . . , . .

    : , - .............................. 29

    . .

    ............................................................................................................ 32

    . .

    ............................................... 36

    . . , . .

    ................................................................................................................................... 39

    . .

    ................................................................................................................................................... 44

    . .

    ........................................................................................................................ 48

    . .

    ............................................................................................................................ 52

    . .

    ........................................................................................................................................................... 56

    . . , . .

    .................................................................................. 59

    . .

    ...................................................................................................................................... 62

    . .

    ...................................................................................................................................................... 65

    . .

    CRM-C .............................................................. 69

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    4

    . .

    ............................................................................................................... 76

    . .

    : .................................................... 83

    . . , . . , . .

    .......................................................................................................... 87

    . .

    - - ...................................................................................................................... 92

    . .

    ................................................................................. 97

    . . , . .

    ............................................. 102

    . .

    ....................................................................................... 106

    . . , . .

    ........................................................................................................... 110

    . .

    ........................................................................................................ 113

    . . , . .

    .............. 117

    . . , . .

    - .................................................................................................................... 121

    . .

    ................................................................................................... 129

    . .

    ........................................................................................................................................................... 133

    . .

    ............................................. 136

    . .

    ............................................................................................................................................... 139

    . .

    ............................................................................................... 143

    . .

    ............................... 146

    . .

    ........................................................................................................................................ 149

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    5

    . . , . . , . .

    .......................................................................................................................................................... 152

    . .

    .................................................................................................................................. 157

    . .

    ......................................................................................................................... 160

    . .

    ............................................................................................................................................................. 166

    . .

    ... 171

    .

    .................................................................................................................................................... 174

    ,

    . . , . . , . .

    .......... 181

    . .

    .................................................. 185

    . . , . . , . .

    ........................................................... 190

    . .

    .............................................................................................................................................. 192

    . . , . .

    .................................... 196

    . .

    ................................................................................................................................................. 199

    . .

    ...................................................................................................................................................... 208

    . . , . .

    ......................................................................................................................................... 213

    . .

    ................................................................................ 216

    . .

    : ............................................................................................................................. 221

    . .

    .................... 225

    . . , . .

    FOREX ........................................... 229

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    6

    . .

    .................................................. 235

    . .

    ................................................................................................................................................................ 241

    . . , . . , . .

    ........................................................................................................ 245

    . .

    : ................................ 253

    . . , . .

    , , , .............................................................................. 258

    . .

    .................................................................................................................... 264

    . . , . .

    ................................................................................................................................... 273

    . . , . .

    ................. 277

    . .

    ........................................................................................................................... 282

    . .

    ................................................. 286

    . .

    ............................................................................................................................................................... 291

    . . , . .

    - ( ) ................................................................................................... 295

    . . , . .

    ................. 299

    . . , . .

    .................................................................................................................................. 303

    . .

    ............................................................................................................................ 309

    . . , . .

    : ........................................................................................................................................................... 313

    . .

    ........................................................ 320

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    7

    -

    658.14/17 (477) . . , . .

    . . .

    The article examined the financial mechanism as the concept of process management finance business under market conditions. Scope of financial resources and financial mechanism in this review expressed their purpose in the business. From the standpoint of this concept is considered problems of the financial mechanism to sustain the competitiveness of machine-building enterprise.

    : , , .

    . . . .. , " , " [1]. , , , .

    . .. : " . " [1].

    , , , . . , ( ), , . . , ' , .

    , , . , , .. - . , " ' ' , . " [1]. , .. , , . .. , " " [1], , . , .

    . , , : , , , , , , , , . . ' , .

    - , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    8

    , . ' . '- -, .

    .., , : " - , " [1]. , , :

    1) ; 2) , ; 3) (, , , , ). (. 1) ',

    .

    , ,

    . 1.

    , , .

    " ". , : ( , ); (, , ) ( ). , ' , , ' , , '.

    , " " IAS 32: " - , ' ".

    : ; -

    ;

    ; .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    9

    ' : ;

    (, ). , ,

    : ) ; ) (). , , ,

    , , , , , ', , , .

    , .

    JI.H. , .

    . , , . , , , , . , , , , , ..

    . , .., , :

    1) ; 2) ; 3) . . , .. , , , , : 1) , ; 2) ; 3) ; 4) . , .. , ' ' - . , , , , :

    , , , ;

    , ;

    , ' .

    .., , , :

    ' ; ; ; ' ; . , .. :

    () ; () ; ; ; ; .

    , ... , ,: 1) ( , ), ' , , , , ; 2) , ; 3) ; 4) .

    , , , .. , .. , .. , .. , . , .. , , .

    . ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    10

    . ', , . , . .

    : ; - ; , ; .

    . , , . , , , . , . .

    . : ' , , . ' , .

    1. .. . / .. ., 2002. 260 .

    2. .. / .. ., 2002. 240 . 3. . : : 2 . / . , . ; [

    . / . .. ]. . : , 2000. 669 .

    14.08.2011

    658.8:303.4(477) . .

    . . -

    . In the article an author is examine the levels of architecture of the strategic marketing and the constituents of its

    methodological and informative support are determined. : , , , .

    . , . , , . , . . , . . , . .

    , , .

    . .

    . , , . :

    ' , ;

    ' , ',

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    11

    , , ; (-

    ), , ;

    , , ;

    , ', .

    , (, , ), , , , , , , ' [1].

    Gartner, : , ,

    , , , '; , , , , ,

    [2 , . 38].

    ( , ) (framework), .

    : , . , , , , .

    . (-) , , , , [ 3].

    . : , , , .

    . .

    . , , .

    , , , . , ' , . , .

    .

    , .

    . ( , ) , . . . .

    () , .

    . , : , , , .

    , , ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    12

    , .

    . .

    , .

    ().

    , , .

    , : ; ; ; ; ; ; ; .

    , , , , , , , , , , .

    , .

    , . , ' ( ), ( ). , , ( ) ( ). , , ( ), , , ( ).

    : - ; - .

    . , , .

    : ; ; ; ; .

    : , , , , ; , , ; : , ; ( ).

    : ; ; : , ; - ; ( '); , ; ; , , , , .

    : SWOT-; ; ; McKincey .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    13

    .

    , : PIMS; BCG; McKinsey 7S; ( ADL/LC); ', LOTS .

    .

    , , , . : SWOT-.

    , . , . , . , . . , . .

    , . , , , , . : , . - , . : .

    , , . , , . . , . , . , , , , .

    : , . , , . , . - . , . , , , , .

    , ' , . , . : , , .

    , : , . , . . , . , . , , , . , , (, ). , (). ' . : , , [4, . 126187].

    : , (. 1).

    - , ( ).

    , . ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    14

    , [5].

    . 1.

    , . , (. 1).

    1

    1 , ,

    ,

    2

    (SWOT-) ,

    3

    , , , , ,

    ,

    4 , ,

    ,

    5

    ( )

    6

    , ' ; ,

    7

    ,

    . , , ' , : , .

    ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    15

    . : ; .

    .

    1. . . [ ] / . ., . ., . . : http://bigc.ru/theory/innovations/ innovations.php

    2. Gartner What Is an Architecture Style? Gartner, 2002. 289 . 3. . [ ] / .

    -: , 2007. : http://bookz.ru/authors/va4eslav-kondrat_ev.html 4. . . :

    / ., ., . -: , 2001. 336 . 5. [

    ]. : http://www.stplan.ru/

    15.08.2011

    657 . . , . . , . .

    - .

    . The article deals with problems of accounting and analytical support effective business activity. An address them through

    the harmonization of tax and accounting. : , , , .

    . - . , - . , , , . , , . , .

    . - , : . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . , , , , , , . . .

    . .

    . , , , ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    16

    . .

    . 1997 , [1]. , . , , . , , . , , , , , . , . , , . , , .

    , , , . , 181 183 , . 182 , 183 . ' () 135, . 657 [2]. , , , , . 30 % , . 9 , 1 . 20092010 , . 14, 84 [2]. , .

    , ' ( , , , ' ) 0,7 % .

    ' . , , , . , , 2010 [3]. , , .

    ' , 01 2011 , . , :

    , ;

    ;

    ' ;

    , , , ' , ..

    , . , :

    - -, , ( . 1- . 2-), '

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    17

    , , , , , , - , ' , , , ' , , ', ' , 25 ; ' ;

    - -, ' ( . 1- . 2-): ' , , 154.6 . 154 III , . , , (), :

    1) ; 2)

    () , , , , , :

    1 2011 ; , (

    , ), , , 20 ;

    (, , ) 50 .

    , . 154.6 , , , ; , , / ; , - ; [3].

    , , , () 25 , [5]. ' , , , , . , , , . . , .

    . , , . .

    , , , , . 157. , . 157 . , , , , , . 157.11 [3]. , , , , ' . .

    , , . , , , . 4 . 13 [6].

    ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    18

    .

    , , .

    20072015 , [7]. ( ) , , .

    , . , / .

    , , . . , . . () , , .

    , , . , .

    2011 . . , : , , ; . , , .

    , , .

    . , , , ' .

    , . , - . , . , , , .

    , - .

    1. : 28.12.1994 334/94- // . 1995. 4. . 51.

    2. http://www.doingbusiness.org/reports/doing-business/doing-business-2011.2.

    3. 02.12.2010 2755-VI // .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    19

    2011. 13-14. . 556. 4. : 16.07.1999 996-

    XIV // . 1999. 40. 5. ' : ()

    25 25.02.2000 39 // 2000. 11. . 296. 6. : ; i 08.07.2010 2456-VI

    [ ]. : http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=2456-17. 7.

    2007-2015 : 16.01.2007 34 [ ]. : http://www.minfin.gov.ua.

    8. [ ]. : http://www.minfin.gov.ua

    9. : ; i 05.01.2011 2 [ ]. : http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=z0144-11

    15.08.2011

    336.761 . .

    ,

    , ,

    : , - , , .

    The factors that determine the liquidity of derivatives which are grouped by the following classification attributes: feature underlying asset, the state's regulation and taxation, structural features, the degree of internationalization.

    : , , - , , .

    . . , . , . , , , . , , . , , . , ,

    , , , .

    . , : . .. [3]; : . [1], . [6]. , . [2], . [5] .

    . . , , . , , .

    . , , , () . , , ; ; . , , , , \ .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    20

    . -, , . -, , , , , . , , , . , , . , , , , , . , . , , . , , .

    , , . , - . , : , , [2, .22]. , , , . , , , .

    , , , , , . , , , ; ; ; , , , -, . , , . , - -. ( ) [3, .619]. , . , , . . , , , , . , , , . , , . , , . , , . , , , .

    , , , , . , , . - . , [4, .278]. , , . ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    21

    . , .

    . , , . , , . . , . , , , , .

    1. . . / . . . . : , 2000. 386 .

    2. . / . // . 2004. 56. . 2124.

    3. .., .. : / . . , . . ; [. .]. . : -., 1998. 784 .

    4. . . / . . . . : , 2010. 504 .

    5. . . : [] / . . . : -, . : , 2008. 632 c.

    6. . . / . . . . : , 2003. 241 .

    7. . ( Reuters ) ; [. .]. . : , 2002. 208 .

    8. () [ ] : 11.05.2010 6376. : http zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgibin/laws/main.cgi.

    9. [ ] : 22 1997 283/97- 27.04.2010 . : http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/.

    10. [ ] : , 2856-VI (2856-17) 23.12.2010. : http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/.

    10.08.2011

    657.03 . . , . .

    -

    . .

    This article contains research on the peculiarities of the knowledge base to draw up a contract for production of goods made on commission. The author clarifies the basic concepts and presents the main features of assembly tolling agreements to improve operations.

    : , , , .

    . , , . . , , , , .

    - , , . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    22

    . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . . . , . . , . . . , , , .

    .

    " " . : ; , , , ; . , , [1].

    - . , , .

    , , .

    , , , , :

    1. , , , .

    2. .

    3. - . ,

    . ,

    , . , . , . , . , , , . . , , . . .

    .. , , , , . - [2, . 37].

    . , , , . , , . , , [3, . 85]. , . . . , .

    , , . , , . " " , . , ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    23

    , . ,

    .. , , [4, . 133].

    " - (, ) , , , , , , () () [5, . 85]. , .

    , , , , .

    . , .

    , . . .

    , , , . .

    , , , . , , , . . , , , . , , . , . . , .

    , , , , , ( 2 61 ) [6].

    , . , . " ", " () ", . , .

    , , , () . , , , .

    , , , , , . .

    , . (. 611): , , ; ; ; . , . .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    24

    , , , , . . , .

    , , , , , , , -. - , . - , , . - [7].

    , , :

    1. , , . - , .

    2. , , .

    3. , (, ), , .

    4. , , .

    . , , , , , ( ) , .

    5. , . , , , .

    ( , ), , .

    6. , . , , . .

    7. , .

    8. , , .

    9. .

    1. . . : . . . . . : . 12.00.03 ; ; / . . . , 2006. 26 .

    2. . . / . . . : . , 1975. 880 . 3. . .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    25

    ( 1/1731 1970. ) / . . // - . .5. ., 1972. . 129136.

    4. ., ., . - / . , . , . // . 1996. 9. . 8587.

    5. . . : . . . .. : . 25.00.02 / . . . , 2007. 22 .

    6. : - . 2 . ; . . . . . . : " " ", 2004. .2. 896 .

    7. . . - : . . . . . : . 08.06.04. , / . . . , 2001. 19 .

    10.08.2011

    336.227.8 . . , . .

    :

    , , , , , .

    In the article are analyzed the patterns of functioning and development of the tax systems in the economic developed countries of the world, are reflected their failings and advantages, influence on development of country, activity of subjects of menage and welfare of citizens, and also are adduced the comparative description of the tax system of Ukraine and the systems of taxation of leading countries of the world.

    : , , , , , .

    . , , . . , , , . , . [1], , , . , .

    . , . . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . : ., . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . .

    . : , ; ; .

    . , , , , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    26

    [2]. . . , , (.1).

    , , , , . : , .

    . , , , .

    39,3

    26,9 28,3

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    . 1. , [3]

    , , (, , , , ). , - , , . , . , .

    , - . , . , , . , .

    , , , , , , . . .

    (. 1), , , . . , , . ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    27

    , . , , , , [4]. . , , , , .

    1

    , [3]

    , %

    , %

    , %

    2009 . 2010 . 2009 . 2010 . 2009 . 2010 .

    20,0 20,0 50,0 50,0 25,0 25,0

    21,0 21,0 53,7 53,7 34,0 34,0

    20,0 20,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0

    15,0 17,5 40,0 50,0 28,0 28,0

    19,0 23,0 40,0 45,0 25,0 24,0

    25,0 25,0 59,0 51,5 25,0 25,0

    16,0 18,0 43,0 43,0 30,0 30,0

    20,0 20,0 45,2 45,2 31,4 31,4

    15,0 15,0 30,0 30,0 10,0 10,0

    21,0 21,0 23,0 26,0 15,0 15,0

    19,0 21,0 15,0 15,0 20,0 15,0

    15,0 15,0 39,0 39,0 28,6 28,6

    18,0 18,0 35,0 35,0 35,0 35,0

    19,0 19,0 52,0 52,0 25,5 25,5

    19,0 19,0 47,5 47,5 29,8 29,8

    22,0 22,0 32,0 32,0 19,0 19,0

    19,0 19,0 16,0 16,0 16,0 16,0

    25,0 25,0 40,0 40,6 21,3 20,6

    20,0 20,0 15,0 15,0 25,0 25,0

    19,6 19,6 45,8 45,8 34,4 34,4

    25,0 25,0 56,4 56,4 26,3 26,3

    , [5]. , [6, . 299]. , , , [7]. , . .

    80% . , , , , , . , , . , , , , , [8, . 115].

    , , [6, . 299]. , , - . , . , [9]. , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    28

    , . , . , ' - . , [10, c. 127128].

    , . , ( ) . , , . , , , "" . [8, . 122].

    . - , , , . . 12 [9].

    , , . , , .

    . , , , , . , , , , , . , . , , . 16%, , , . - . , , . . , , , . , , , , .

    1. : 23.12.2010 2856-VI [ ]. : www.rada.gov.ua.

    2. . . [ ] / . . : http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/PSPE/2008-3/Volkov_308.htm.

    3. Taxation trends in the European Union // European Commission. Taxation trends in the European Union

    [ ]. 2010. : http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_ customs/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_structures/index_en.htm.

    4. . / . // . 2006. 2. . 23.

    5. . : / . , . , . // . 2003. 5. . 1219.

    6. . . - : [] / . . . : -, 2005. 371 .

    7. . . : -

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    29

    : . . . . : . 12.00.07 / . . ; - . . ., 2007. 20 .

    8. / [ . . . ]. . : " ", 2004. 240 .

    9. [ ]. : http://www.sta.gov.ua/control/uk.

    10. . . : [. .] / . . , . . . . : , 2004. 208 .

    12.08.2011

    330.14: 658.15 . . , . .

    -

    : , -

    ;

    ; , .

    The article reviews the definitions of economic essence and generalization of current assets; the authors definitions are given; the essential features of the "current assets" main categories such as working funds and "working capital are distinguished.

    : , , .

    . , () . .

    .

    . , , , . ., . ., . ., . ., . ., . ., . . , .

    . , , , . , . , .

    . , , . , ( ) , . , ( ) [1, . 78].

    . ( , ), , , , . , , , , .

    (. 1.1), , - , ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    30

    ( , , ) [2, . 65].

    1

    ,

    , , ,

    .

    () 2 [3]

    () ,

    , , - .

    . ., . ., . .,

    .. [4, 189]

    ,

    .

    . . [5, .203]

    , ,

    .

    . ., . .,

    . . [6, .74]

    - - , ,

    (, , , ).

    . ., . .,

    . . [7, .115]

    ,

    . . . [8, .94]

    , .

    . . [9, .67]

    : , - , .

    , : , .

    , , , : , , . . , , , , , . , . ; [2, .67].

    , , . 1.

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    31

    . 1.

    :

    - 1. (1)

    () , (), (), (), , (1). , , .

    , , , :

    1. , . , , , , , . , ( )

    2. , , .

    3. . .

    . , , , , .

    1. . . / . . // 2009. . 2. . 7682.

    2. . . / . . // . 2010. 7 (110). . 6470.

    3. () 2 , 31.03.99 . 87, 21.06. 99 . 396/3689 .

    4. , : [. . . . . , . . , . . ]. . : , 2008. . 189191.

    5. . . : [. ]. . : , 2008. . 203204. 6. . . - : [

    . . . . , . . , . . ]. : , 2001. . 7475.

    7. : [. . . . ]. 2- ., . : " 2006", 2008. . 115119.

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    32

    8. . . : : [. ] / . . . . : -, 2002. . 9498.

    9. . . : [. ] / . . . . : , 2004. . 6769.

    21.08.2011

    65:338.242 . .

    .

    . In article structural elements of the economic mechanism of operation of business are allocated. Features of their

    transformation are designated at formation of the economic mechanism of adaptation of the enterprise to crisis conditions. : , , , .

    . , . , , . , . . .

    . .

    . , . [1], . [2], .., .. . .., .. [3], .. - ; ; ; - . - .. , .. . .. [4] , - . , , , . . , , .

    . , , :

    , ;

    .

    . , .

    (, , , , ), , (, , , ).

    , - , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    33

    : , ; ( ,

    ), ; (, ,

    ); , ; ,

    .

    : , ; , , ,

    , ;

    , , ;

    c, .

    , , , . , , .

    , , , : , , , , .

    , , . , , , .

    , : , , . . . , , , () . , , , . , , , , . , . , , .

    .

    , : , , , . , , . , . , , . ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    34

    . , . , , , .

    , : , ; ; . , , .

    , . : , , ( ). , , , .

    , , , . , : , , , .

    , : , , , . . . , . . , . , . .

    (): , , , (), , , , , (), , , , . .

    : , , , , , , , .

    , , :

    , , , ;

    , , , , ;

    , , , ;

    ;

    , ;

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    35

    , ;

    - , , - .

    , , .

    , , , .

    , , , .

    , . 1.

    (, , , )

    (, ,

    , , , , ,

    , ,)

    (, , ,

    , , , , , ,

    , , )

    (, , ,

    , , , , )

    (, ,

    , )

    (; ; ; ,

    , )

    (, , ,

    , , )

    . 1.

    . , , :

    ; (, ,

    );

    ; ; ; ; ;

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    36

    , .

    .

    1. . / . ; [. .]. . : , 1982. 236 . 2. . / . . . . . . ; [. .

    .]. . : , 1989. 498 . 3. . . : .

    . ... . . . : 08.06.01 / . . . -. ., 2002. 18 . 4. . . - /

    . . . : - , 1994. 283 .

    18.08.2011

    656.613.003.2 . .

    ,

    . , .

    We have revealed the main factors which calculation is necessary when forming price policy of the multimodal operator. The criteria influencing the decision making as to the price low bottom for his services have been determined.

    : , , , .

    . . , () , , , , .

    . , .

    . .. [1], .. [2]. . , .. [3], . [4]. , .., ..[5]. , , , , , , .

    . , , :

    , ; , ; , . .

    , , , / [6].

    ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    37

    : ( ,

    , , , ; , , , , );

    ( , , ..);

    . , , , , [7]. , ( ) .

    . , . , (, ), .

    , , , [3], , , .

    , , :

    ; ; , .. (,

    , ..).

    [1]. , , , .

    , - (, , ), ( , , ). , .

    1.

    1

    ,

    1

    ;

    n

    j pj j pj

    j

    p k p k F

    Fz zz pz pz

    z

    K Tp k k

    x

    j pjFz zz pz pz Ez

    z Ej

    p kK Tp k k t

    x t

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    38

    :

    1

    1

    max;

    ( 1,....., );

    ( 1,..... );

    0( 1,....., )

    j

    n

    j n j

    j

    n

    i ij j

    j

    H j

    j

    D p k x

    T t x i n

    x x j m

    x m

    pj - j- ; kpj - j- ; F - ; pz - ; kpz - ; kpz - , (,

    ); Fz - ,

    ( ); z - , ; xi - ; pj - j- ,

    ; kpj - j- ; tEj - j- ; tEz - ; D - ( ); xj - j; Ti - i- ; tij - i j; x Hj - j.

    , :

    , / ; , /; / ; , /. . ,

    , , . , , .

    1. . . / . . , . . . : , 1990. . 14.

    2. . . / .. ., .. . : , 1985. . 205.

    3. . . / . . , . . . . : , 2001. . 299.

    4. . . / .. . . : , 2001. . 291

    5. . , / . , . // - . , 2010. . 188.

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    39

    6. / [. . , . . , . . .] ; . .. . . : , 2002. C. 279.

    7. . . / . . , . . // : . - , . . . . . , 2006.

    18.08.2011

    336.22:004.9 . . , . .

    . , , .

    The article is considered consept of electronic tax reporting system efficiency, as information systems based on the integral index. Analysis of tasks and functions of the STA, which allows automated information system. System of benchmarks to measure performance was worked out.

    : , , .

    . . - , , , . , , : , , 20072015 , .

    49.4 , ' , , , , , [4]. . : , , , , , , . , , , , , .

    . () , .. , .. .. , .. , .. , . . , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , . , (), , .

    . , .. , .. . , . , .

    , [10]:

    1. (Return n Investment, Total Cost of Ownership, Economic Value Added);

    2. (Real Options Valuation, Applied Information Economics); 3. (Balanced Scorecard, Information Economics).

    ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    40

    . ( , .) : , . ( ) , . . (, , ) . ( , ). () . ' .

    . , .

    . (), , , . (.1), .

    ,

    . 1.

    , , , . , . , , , . .

    : , , , . (. 1)..

    , : , , , .

    , , .

    , , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    41

    1

    , , ( )

    , .

    , ,

    () ,

    ,

    , , ,

    ,

    , .

    ( ) ,

    ,

    , , , , .

    , , , . (. 2).

    2

    dK

    chK

    pK

    o

    K

    eK

    . newK

    erK

    () dC

    bC

    iC

    pC

    sC

    aF

    plF

    tF

    iP

    kP

    , , . , () :

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    42

    chmin, min, min, max, min,

    max, min, min, min, min,min, min, max, min, max,

    max, max

    d p o e

    new er d b i

    p s a pl t

    i k

    K K K K K

    K K C C CC C F F F

    P P

    (1)

    , :

    . . , . .

    [1]:

    1

    0 0 0

    1

    1 min

    n

    i i

    i

    Y y y

    , (2)

    i = 1n ;

    0i ( , ,

    );

    0iy . (2)

    (1).

    ,

    .

    11 1 1 1

    0 0ch 0ch 0 0 0 0 0 01 1

    0 0 0 0

    1 1 1 1 1

    1 1 min

    od d p p o o e e

    new new er er

    K F F F F F

    F F

    11 1 1 1

    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 1 1 1 mind d b ob i i p p s sC C C C C C

    (3)

    11 1

    0 0 0 0 0 01 1 1 mina a pl pl t tF F F F

    1 1

    0 0 0 01 1 mini i k kP P P

    (2), (3), ( , ) [3]:

    10 0,max (1 max )max

    i i

    LL L L

    L

    , (4)

    L , , ,K C F P ;

    max iL ;

    0,1...0,3 , .

    , :

    1 1 1 1

    0 0 0 01 1 1 1k c f pEff K C F P

    . (5)

    . (5) :

    0 1max

    EffEff

    Eff

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    43

    1 1 1

    0 0 01

    0

    max 1 max 1 max 1 max

    1 max .

    k c f

    p

    Eff K C F

    P

    (6)

    . . : , .

    ,

    ( iL iL ).

    iL , (

    Eff iL ) ( Eff iL ).

    dstL , (1):

    ch, , , , , , , , , ,dst d p e er d b i p s plL K K K K K C C C C C F . (7)

    :

    / / / / / / /

    ch

    ch

    / / /

    1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, , , , , , , ,

    1 1 1, , .

    d p e er d b i

    d p e er d b i

    p s pl

    p s pl

    K K K K K C C CK K K K K C C C

    C C FC C F

    (8)

    . .. [7]:

    , 0;1i i

    i i

    i i

    L Lz z

    L L

    . (9)

    iz 1,

    0, , . :

    1/ 2

    2

    1

    (1 ) min

    m

    i iEff z

    . (10)

    , . , . , , .

    . , , , , . , ; , , .

    , , . , ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    44

    . . , . .

    1. : /[. . , . . , . . , . . ]. . : , 1997. 240 .

    2. . . : , , : [] / . . , . . , . . . : , 2004. 320 .

    3. . . / . . // . 2010. 3. . 117123.

    4. 20.04.2011 . 2755-17 . 5. . : / . //

    . 2008. 10. . 43. 6. .

    / . // . 2008. 10. . 35. 7. . . / . ., . . . :

    -, 1996. 327 . 8. . . / . . . :

    , 2002. 256 . : . 9. . . / . . //

    . 2002. 2. . 1320 [ ]. : http://www.library.dgtu.donetsk.ua/fem/vip97/97_03.pdf.

    10. [ ] : http://www.osp.ru/os/2004/ 07/184997/

    19.08.2011

    658.15:336.58(447) . .

    ,

    . , : , , , .

    n this article the questions, related to the necessity of forming the valuing criteria of financial mechanism the enterprise cost management effectiveness are lighted. In connection with this aim is suggested to use four valuing coefficients, corresponding the basic financial categories, which cost management effectiveness characterize: quality, cost, profitableness, innovations.

    : , , , .

    . , , , . . , . , , . .

    . , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    45

    . , .

    . , , . .. , .., , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. . , , , , .

    . , , , , .

    . , . , , , .

    , , . , , , . , . , , . , .

    , , . , . , , , , . .

    , / , [1, . 38]. , , , .

    (, , , ) (, ), , . , , . , .

    , , . , , , , , , ; , , .; , , ; , .

    , .

    [2, . 12]. , , , . , , , . , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    46

    :

    ( ):2

    , (1)

    ;

    ;

    ;

    .

    , , . . , , , . :

    , (2)

    ;

    ;

    .

    , . . - . , :

    , (3)

    ;

    ;

    .

    , . . , . :

    , (4)

    ;

    ;

    . ,

    ( 5).

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    max;K min;

    K min;

    K max.

    (5)

    , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    47

    , , , , (. 1).

    1

    , ( )

    1

    . 170 (. 2)

    2

    . 280 . 3 (. 1)

    3

    . 280 . 4 (. 1)

    4 , . 24

    5 , . 23

    6 . 040 (. 2)

    7

    . 010 (. 2)

    8

    . 710 + . 720 (. 1-)

    9 . 040 + . 070 + . 080 + . 090 + . 140 + . 150

    + . 160 (. 2)

    . , , , . , . ( , , ) , (, , , ).

    , , , , , .

    1. . . / . . , . . // . 2009. 4. . 3740.

    2. . . : . . . . . : . 08.00.10 , / . . . , 2008. 20 .

    10.08.2011

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    48

    [336.77:334.722-022.51] (477) . .

    ,

    . , .

    In the article the analysis of small business credit, given the risks and goals of bank lending. The main factors reducing lending and outlines solutions to the problems of credit for small businesses.

    : , , , , .

    . , , . , 10%, 50%. . , . . , .

    . , , .

    . , . , . , . , . . , , , .

    . , , . . , .

    . , , [1, . 122123]: ( , , , , ); ( ); ( ). .

    , , , [1, . 123], :

    - , : , ; , , ;

    - , : , , ; ; .

    , , , , . . , , .

    - , , , 2030%. , , [2, . 52];

    . , , ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    49

    . , , .

    - , , , , ;

    - , "start up" [2, . 52]; . : 1)

    : ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ( , ); ) " "; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; 2) : ) ; ) ; ) (); ) [3, . 132].

    , , , , . , , .

    .. , , , , [4, . 205]. .1.

    1. . 2. . 3. .4. . 5. . 6. .

    1. . 2. . 3. . 4. . 5. . 6. . 7. .

    . 1. [2, . 205]

    , . - (), , - . USAID, EU [5].

    , , , , . , 2008 , , , .

    , , , : - . , ,

    , , , , ;

    - . , ;

    - ; - .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    50

    , , , , 2008 , , 12,9 19,4% 2008 (. 2).

    . 2. , ( ) 20082010 [6]

    2009 - , . , , 22,0 17,3% 2009 . 2010 . , , , 15,8 12,3% 2010 .

    , 2008 , , , 15,5% 2008- , 17,7 2009 13,8 2010 ( 2010 ) (. 3).

    , , , , 2009 2010 , , , .

    2008 , , ( ) 19,4% 2008 13,4% 2007 .

    2008 15,5% 13,0% 2007 , 17,6 13,9% [6, . 6869].

    . 3. ( ) 20022010 [6]

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    51

    , [7, . 55] :

    - () ;

    - ; -

    ; - , ,

    ; -

    , ; - , ; - , ; - , ,

    , ; -

    . . , ,

    , : 1) , , ; 2) , , , ; 3) ; 4) ( . , ( , , ) ); 5) ; 6) ; 7) start up ( " ") .

    1. . / . // . 2008. 6 (21). . 121130.

    2. . / . // . 2010. 1. . 5253.

    3. . / . // . 2008. 3 (18). . 131135.

    4. . . / .. // . 2009. 3 (6). . 203207.

    5. [ ] / - . : www.microcredit.com.ua.

    6. 2009 / . , 2009. 206 . 7. : , , / [ . ., . .,

    . . .] ; . . . . . . : , 2009. 142 .

    10.08.2011

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    52

    658.5(075.8) . .

    . . .

    The article considers the items devoted to management of the enterpriser's value using the methods based on profit. The methods which concern the flows of funds and the residual income are described. The concept of economic added value is analyzed as one of the means of business value management.

    : , , .

    . , , , , , . , . , , , .

    , . , , . , .

    , , .

    . . , . , . , . . , .. , .. .

    , , - . , , .

    . , , , , , .

    [15] ( ) :

    1. . (, , ), , , . . .

    2. . , , , , . .

    3. . ( , ) . , . .

    4. . , . , , . . .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    53

    , , .

    5. , ( , ). . , . , . [1] , . , , . .

    . , - , , .

    , , , , , . [3]:

    1. , : Free Cash Flows (FCF), Eguity Cash Flows (ECF), Capital Cash Flows (CCF).

    2. , : Economic Value Added (EVA), Shareholder Value Added (SVA), Market Value Added (MVA), CVA.

    3. , EBO. [1, 4]: = +

    +/ - / . , ,

    , 80- 20 (DCF method). , () , ( ).

    : (CF), .

    , , () . , () (, ) . , , . , [1, 2].

    (FCF) , , , [5].

    (EVA), , , . 1890 . , , ( ), [6].

    , , , , :

    (ROA) (ROE). , , , . , NOPAT , .

    : , .. , ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    54

    . , , , . , -. , , , -, , . VA , . , , . , , .

    , , EVA , , , , .

    , , , , - , , . , , , SVA. , . , .

    , , , , , . , , , , .

    , , , .

    (market value added - MVA), . . , MVA , , , , . , MVA , - [1, 3, 5].

    , , , . , , , .

    , , .. (

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    55

    ), , , .

    (Edwards-Bell-Ohlson valuation model, EBO). .

    . - ( ).

    , , , . . [7]

    , , , , , , , , .

    , , , .

    , . , , , , , , .

    . , , , . , - . , . . , .

    1. . : / ., ., . . : -, 2002. 565 .

    2. . . / . . . : -, 2008. 720 .

    3. . / ., . . . : , 2001. 465 .

    4. . . [ ]. : www.cfin.ru

    5. . : / ., . ., 2007. 457 .

    6. . : 3 . / . . : -, 1993. 1078 .

    7. www.publichi-audit.ru

    19.08.2011

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    56

    658.15 . .

    .

    . .

    The place of leasing in the effective management of working capital. The features of the operations unit and indirect leasing. Approaches to the classification of species and forms of leasing. The perspectives of application of leasing hardware manufacturers

    : , , , .

    . . . - , "-", . , .

    . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . , . , , , .

    . , .

    . .

    . :

    - -, , ;

    - -, .

    , , . , ' .

    , , . , , , .

    , . .

    [1, . 7273]: 1) , ,

    ( ). , , , .

    2) , .

    3) , , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    57

    4) , .

    . , . , .

    , , [2]. . , , . . - . , , . . , , , ' .

    , , , .

    , () , , .

    , ' , , , -, , 11.12.2003 . 1381-IV (1381-15).

    [3, . 28]: 1) ,

    ; 2)

    , , (. 1).

    100 %

    80 %

    . 1. [ : 1, . 4754; 3, . 3745]

    , .

    . . (. 1).

    , . . 2.

    / , , , () . , , .

    . , . , , , . , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    58

    1

    [1, . 2735; 3, . 2528]

    1.

    , -

    2. ,

    -

    3.

    , -

    ,

    Tail-Ser vice-leasing

    -

    Full-Service-leasing

    4. '

    (-)

    - Finance Leasing

    90 %

    Operati ve Leasing

    ()

    5.

    (hiring)

    (renting)

    6. ()

    -, ,

    7.

    8. First Hand

    leasing

    -

    Second Hand leasing

    9.

    Leveraged leasing

    10.

    -

    . 2. [ : 1, . 7374, 3, . 5660]

    . ' . , , , , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    59

    .

    1. . . : [] / . . , . . . : , 2002. 143 .

    2. ' . . : . - . . . . ; . 08.04.01. , / ' . . . : - . .. , 2000. 18 .

    3. . . : [] / . . . : , 2000. 158 .

    15.08.2011

    339.178.3:339.187.6:631.11 . . , . .

    .

    , . .

    The article exposed the clearing of farms. An description of these kinds of calculations farms as factoring and leasing. The main problems of the factoring and leasing services.

    : , , , .

    . , . . .

    . , .

    . . . , . , . , . , . . , .. , .. .

    . : ; ; -

    ; ,

    ; . . .

    (, , ). , .

    . , . , , . . [7].

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    60

    , , , .

    , () . , , . , , , , , , .

    2010 . 2010 . , . ( 2835% ). 2010 80 [2].

    , , , . -, (. 1, ).

    1

    1. 2.

    3.

    4. 5. -

    6. -

    1.

    2.

    3. 4.

    5. ,

    , , (. 1) [5].

    . 1.

    . - . [3].

    , , - .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    61

    5053 . , 910 . , 2,02,1 . , 3,54 . , 1,51,6 . , . 126 , . 80 %, 92 % [1].

    - (. 2).

    12%

    33%

    28%

    7%

    20%

    . 2. 2010 ( )

    .

    , . .

    / , [4].

    , , 100 , , 260 , 160 .

    160 : 2 ; ; - ; ; , . , 100

    : 54,45 ; 4 75 . 129,45 . C : 1520 ,

    2,5 ; 910 ,

    , , 2,5 . ,

    [6]. . ,

    . . .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    62

    , . - , ' .

    1. . . / . . , . . // . 2010. 10. . 103108.

    2. . . : / . . // . 2010. 9. . 2023.

    3. . . / . . // . 2010. 6. . 4952.

    4. . . / . . // 2010. 2010. 1. . 59.

    5. . / . . , . . // . 2010. 6. . 100107.

    6. . . / . . // . 2010. 4. . 9699.

    7. . / . // . 2010. 17. . 3544.

    16.08.2011

    336.66 . .

    -

    . ' ,

    Various problems and approaches to the management of industrial enterprises as an open economic system. The relation of the results of businesses from opening their economies, criteria and elements of its classification

    : , , , .

    . , ' . , , .

    . , . , .

    . .

    . .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    63

    . , , . ' , , , [1, . 229230]. , , , .

    , . , . , , , . ", () " [2].

    , , , , ' . - ' . , , , . , .

    , (). , . / , ' .

    , :

    - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ,

    ; - . ,

    , . ', , . . , .

    , , , . , . , . . :

    - , , ; - , ; - ; : - ; - ;

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    64

    - ; - . , ,

    , . (. 1).

    /

    , , ,

    ,

    ' ,

    '

    ' ,

    , ,

    ,

    . 1. [ : 2; 3, . 3335]

    , '. , , , :

    - ( , , ); - ( ).

    ' ' . . , ' .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    65

    , ' . . .

    , , , . , , . , , .

    . , ' . , .

    , .

    ' , , , .

    1. . . / . . // . . . 2010. 6. . 3. . 228231.

    2. ( ) [ ]. : http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/

    3. . . / . . // . . : , 1999. . 86. . 3236.

    16.08.2011

    65 . .

    .

    , - .

    General list of events marketing optimization industry. Grounded optimizing marketing strategies and marketing policies in terms of dynamic changes in target markets, the formation of industrial-technological and industrial potential springs.

    : , , , .

    . , , , , ' , , . ', .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    66

    . , , , .

    . , , . : . . , . , . . . . , . . , . . , . , . , . , . , . . . , . , . , . , . , . , , .

    . - , .

    . .

    . , . , , , . , , . , . .

    , , . , , .

    , , , , , , .

    ', [1, . 124126; 2, . 345]:

    - ; - ; - -; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - . ,

    . , , .

    , . . , , , .

    [2, . 426]: - ; - ; - (

    );

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    67

    - ; - ; - - ; - . ,

    , , , , . , McKincey General Electric, Arthur D. Little, , (PIMS).

    , , .

    , ', : .

    , , , , , , . , [3, . 192193]:

    1. (, , , - , , ).

    2. , , , . 3. , . 4. , . ,

    . , , , -, , (. 1).

    -

    -

    , ,

    (, )

    . 1.

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    68

    , . , , . , . , , - . .

    " ".

    , [4, . 241]:

    - ; - '; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - ; - . ,

    , , , ' , .

    . , , , , , , , , , , , .

    , .

    .

    1. . . / . . . . : , 2002. 245 . 2. . / . [. . . . . , . .

    , . . ]. : "", 1999. 896 . 3. . . / . . [ .. ]. . :

    , 1989. 519 . 4. . . : / . . , . .

    . . : ", 2004. 288 .

    10.08.2011

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    69

    658:004.9 . .

    -

    CRM-C .

    - . The article presents research on the formation models of customer management. The question of economic and

    mathematical models and the formation of a number of models using computer simulation. : , - , .

    - , ., ., ., ., ., C ., . . , , , , , , . , .

    , CRM , . CRM- , . CRM , , . . . . . - , , . , , , .

    . (CRM) ()

    , . CRM , , . CRM- , , , .

    1 RM . CRM ,

    , , .

    1

    RM-

    : ACT, GoldMine, Maximaizer, Sales Expert.

    : Clientele, Onyx, Sales Logix. : Oracle, SAP, Siebel, AAN, ,

    1: CRM, Brio,

    Business Objects, Broadbase, E. Piphany, Hyperion, MicroStrategy, SAS, Marketing

    analytic, Terasoft,

    Intranet Solutions, Plumtree, Symon, Vignette, Aspect, Broadvision, Cisco

    CRM : ; ; ; , ; ; . CRM - .

    , CRM- 11 . ( ISM Inc, CRM-) [1, c.134]. :

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    70

    ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; . CRM-

    , , , . ,

    .

    CRM. :

    . CRM. -. - . RM . (, ,

    ). - RM-. . . . CRM

    (. 2). , ' .

    ' ' [2, c. 207].

    CRM- , , . , , , CRM-, .

    1. . CRM- , , , .

    2. , . , .

    3. ' .

    4. . CRM- , .

    , CRM- .

    : Gartner, CRM- 2009 9150

    ., 12,5% 2008 (8,13 .). ,

    . - , . , .

    CRM : , , -

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    71

    . , , , , , , . , , CRM, [4, c. 69]. , .

    2

    RM RM

    ', WAP, SMS - .

    - -

    ,

    ,

    , '

    ' CRM-, , ERP-

    , , 3.

    ( 3) , , , , . . . , : , . .

    , , .

    : 1. ,

    - . 2.

    . .

    3. , . , , , .

    4. . ( , , ) ( , , ).

    5. .

    3

    RM CRM

    ,

    (.)

    ,

    (%),

    (%), (.)

    , CRM

    (%), (%)

    , , . , , . , ', , , , , .

    ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    72

    , . ? ? ? , , , , - , . , ' , .

    (Customer Relationship Management, CRM), , (call-center), , . . , , . , , , , . . , data-mining, , .

    . CRM- , , , .

    , , OLAP ( ) , data mining . , , . , , , .

    ? CRM [4]: , , .

    1) CRM- . . , Web- , , , . , -, .. .

    , , , . , . , , . .

    2) , ', , data-mining . , ; , : , , , ; , ; ; , , . .

    , .

    3) -. , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    73

    , . , , , . . , , (, , lifetime value), , , . , , :

    , ; , CRM-

    .

    . , , , , .

    4) CRM-, , . , , , CRM- . , , . ( , ). . , , , . - , , . : .

    A. .

    ( ) . (, ). .

    : = (X, Y, S, F(y), G, PRfn, tf, = {x1,... xr} i

    ; = {1,...,n} . S={s0,...,sr} ; s0=s{t0), sr=s(tr)

    ; sj=s(tj) - ti; F={f1,.. fm} , ; f(y) (f(y); X*S Y); G , , '; PRfn - f; tf f (. 1).

    X

    Y

    . 1.

    .

    CRM-, . , :

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    74

    - ; - ; - ; - - ; - ; - ; - , ; - .

    S2(t2)

    PRf2 = Y2 S3(t2)

    Sn(t2)

    Z

    PRf1 = Y1

    S1(t1)

    PRfn

    t1 t2 t

    . 2. t1 t2

    Z Y; (t1,t2) tf. ,

    , , ' , . , , , .

    - CRM-, - , , . AllFusion Process Modeler v7.1 IDEF0 DFD [5].

    . 3 IDEF0. , CRM-.

    . 3. IDEF0

    . 4. , - -

    : , , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    75

    , -, , .

    - . 4, -.

    . 4. IDEF0

    . 5 - IDEF0. , , , , .

    . 5. - IDEF0

    , .

    . , . .

    . , .

    Terasoft , ( ) Terasoft. ,

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    76

    -.

    : . ,

    . : 1. .

    . 2. . 3. -. 4. , . 5. . , CRM

    , , , , .

    1. ., . 8 / . , . . 2006. 340 .

    2. . . : [. ] / . ., . ., . . . : , 2007. 462 .

    3. http://www.gartner.com/technology/analysts.jsp

    4. . . . / . ., . ., . . . : , 2005. 340.

    5. . . - : / . . , ., . : , 2006. 176 .

    10.08.2011

    338.312 . .

    -

    . , , .

    The article presents research on the formation of economic and mathematical models of information system of higher education institution. Graphs, matrix and information models can form a clear communication flow between the automated working places users to define efficient algorithms for formation of the actions and output document management system.

    : , - , .

    . , .. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , , , . - , . . .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    77

    - .

    .

    [1] ( ) , . : ; ; ; ; - WEB-; ; ; ; ; ; ; - .

    - .

    , , , , - , () [3].

    (, , ), .

    ' (, ),

    ( 1, , 1, ),ijC

    ijx i n j m

    (, , , , , ',

    ), ijC .

    : , .

    - Z0. (1) (24).

    01 1

    n m

    ij ij

    i j

    Z C x

    ; (1)

    1

    m

    ij i

    j

    x r

    ; (2)

    1

    n

    ij i

    i

    x p

    ; (3)

    0ijx ; (4)

    1, ; 1, .i n j m

    (2) ; (3) ; (3) .

    Xij (), - ' ( ) . '- , , , , , , () , ' .

    ' (), (, , , , ) ', , , .

    , , . .

    ( ) , : ; , ; ; ; ;

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    78

    ; ', ; () () ; ; ; , , , , , , , , , .

    : , , , .

    - , , . , , , , . . - , ( ) .

    ( ) . . .

    .

    [4, 5]. 1 , .

    . , . - . , ( ), , , , , , , , . , , . IDEF. ICAM Definition Method, ICAM Integrated Computer Aided Manufacturing, - . IDEF ( , ) [6].

    1

    k1 k2 k3 k4

    d1 -

    r1

    d2

    -

    - r2

    d

    -

    d4

    - -

    IDEF : IDEF0 ; IDEF1 ,

    ; IDEF1X (IDEF1 Extended) ( ),

    (ER Entity-Relationship) , , ;

    IDEF2 ( , );

    IDEF3 ; IDEF4 - ,

    , - ;

    IDEF5 ( ).

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    79

    , DFD (Data Flow Diagram ) WFD (Work Flow Diagram ). , -. . , [3].

    IDEF0 BPwin (Business Process for Windows). . - , , , - .

    BPWin , , . BPWin Model report (. 1), .

    , (), .

    (. 1), .

    4 : . . . . , ,

    . . .

    . 1. ,

    . , . , BPWin , , .

    (. 2). .

    , . . , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    80

    . 2.

    .

    , , .

    , , , , .

    . , , . , . .

    , , (. 3).

    . 3.

    , . . , , , , . , . - , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    81

    , , . , , . , . , , . , 4 , , .

    , , .

    , . , , . . , . . , , , .

    , . , , . .

    , (. 4). , . , . . , -, , , , , . - , . .

    .

    . , , , , , . .

    . 4.

    , - , . . .

    , . , , . - - .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    82

    2

    4 1 , . 2 , .

    / 5 30

    55 60

    - / 5 40

    0 30

    4

    / 0 30

    - / 5 30

    70 220

    . , , .

    , , (. 2).

    (. 4).

    0 50 100 150 200 250

    12

    .

    /

    /

    / /

    . 5.

    . , .

    , - , .

    .

    ( ) - .

    1. http://www.vsau.vin.ua

    2. http://vsau.vin.ua/b06093/library/sofia.php?action=

    3. . . : : [ ] / . . . : , 2005. 432 .

    4. . . / . . , . . // . : 2010. . 7781.

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    83

    5. . . / . . , . . // - -2011. 1719 2011 . : 2011 . 238242.

    6. . ., .. - IDEF0, DFD, IDEF3 / . . , . . // . 2006. 12.

    16.08.2011

    650.18 . .

    :

    , , . .

    In the article was proved the importance of studying the essence of financial results and their formation from the period when the first results of human activity were appeared, not from the first period of appearance economic schools, as adopted in modern economic science. Investigated the views of thinkers of antiquity and the Middle Ages to the substance and the formation of financial results.

    : , , .

    . , , , . , .

    . , .

    . , , , , , . . ., . ., . ., . ., . ., . . .

    . , , , .

    , . . , , . [1, . 40].

    . . -, [2].

    . , , [3, . 120], . , .

    , , . . . . , , , . , .-. [4, . 187].

    . , , , , , . , , . , . , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    84

    . , . , , [5, . 58].

    , , - , , , .

    , , , . , , , , . , , .

    . , . , , . , , , .

    , , . , , . . , , .

    , , , . , , , . , , , . .

    , , (. 1).

    , , , .

    . .

    1.

    2.

    3. ( )

    4. -

    5.

    . 1.

    . , .

    -. .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    85

    . , , . , , . , , . .

    , , .

    , , . , , .

    :

    : :

    >

    <

    . 2.

    , , . , . . , . , , [6].

    , , , , .

    , . , . . , .

    , , , , , , .

    , , , , , . () , , .

    . . , , () , , , . , , , .

    , , , . , , , : , , , , . . 3.

    , , ( ), .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    86

    ()

    , (

    )

    : - ;

    -

    ,

    ,

    . 3.

    , , , , , , , . . . , , , [7, . 21]. , , .

    , , , ; , .

    , . , , , . -. , , -, , [8, . 33].

    , , - . , , . , . () .

    . , , . , , . , , , . , , , . , , .

    , , , . , , . , , ( ), .

    . , , () . , , , .

    1. . . / . . // . . 2010. 17. . 37 44.

    2. - . . - / . . - // . 2010. 10 12. . 85 94.

    3. . . / . . // . 2010. 5/1. . 120 123.

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    87

    4. . . / . . , . . // . 2006. 16.2. . 186 190.

    5. . . / . . // . 2009. 4. . 58 60.

    6. . [ ]. : http://www.philosophy.ru/library/ aristotle/polit/index.html

    7. / , , , . : ; : . 358 .

    8. . . . .: - , 1940. 484 .

    21.08.2011

    677.11.021 . . , . . , . .

    ,

    . , 37 854 411,04 .

    The article is devoted to the economic ground of expediency of processing of oilseed flax stems on the south of Ukraine, namely in the Kherson region. Economic calculations, that an income from processing of oilseed flax stems will fold 37 854 411,04 hrn.s is proved.

    : , , , .

    . . 70% . , , (, , , , , ) (, , , , , , (, , ). , , , [1]. . , 2002 2010 . 9,35 . 60,22 . (. 1) [2].

    9,3512,97 13,95

    25,07

    49,7

    45,3

    50,1

    55,94

    60,22

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    ,

    .

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    . 1. 20022010 .

    - . , 48% , 1624 % , , -3 -6, , , , . ( , , .), ( , , - , , .), ( , , ) - ( , , , .) [1].

    2530 . ./, 35 . ./, .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    88

    . , . . , , . , , , , , . , .

    , 10,61 . . (. 2).

    0,04

    0,05

    0,07

    0,15

    0,17

    0,27

    0,38

    0,49

    0,7

    0,74 1,08

    3,19

    3,28

    0 0,25 0,5 0,75 1 1,25 1,5 1,75 2 2,25 2,5 2,75 3 3,25 3,5

    , .

    . 2. 2011 .

    1520 /. , , , .

    , 2011 , : 10,61 . , .

    . , , [3]. , Charle. , , , , .

    , -101, , , 19 , . Charle, , Charle, .

    28-30%, . , , -600- -4. . 3.

    , , .

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    89

    , 2011 20 /, [4], 10,61 . :

    . 3.

    = S, (1)

    S , . ; , /; , . . = 10,6120 = 21 220 . .

    (. 3), -600- -4 225 /, , 2 240 :

    Q = 2, (2)

    2 ; , /; ; , . Q = 22258240 = 864 000 / , ,

    :

    =O/Q , (3)

    , ; Q , / =21 220 /864 = 24 ,

    24 . . ,

    , 11 35 %, , :

    = (O B)/100 , (4)

  • 2011, 5, T. 2

    90

    , ; , ; , %. = (21 220 11)/100 = 2 334, 2 . , 1 1750 :

    = , (5)