질적 자료 분석 방법으로서 매트릭스 분석(Matrix Analysis)의 이해 민성은* 진주교육대학교 질적탐구 Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 2016, 제2권 제2호, pp.161~191 본 연구에서는 질적 자료 분석의 한 방법으로서 매트릭스 분석의 개념과 특징, 적용 방법에 대 해 알아보고자 하였다. 매트릭스(matrix)는 행과 열로 이루어진 두 목록들을 교차시킴으로써 자료를 시각화시키는 데이터 디스플레이(data display) 방법 이다. 매트릭스 분석은 자료 수집 과 자료 분석이 순환적으로 이루어지는 질적 연구 과정 중에서 연구자로 하여금 연구 문제에 적합한 자료 수집을 가능하게 할 뿐 아니라, 독자로 하여금 광범위한 질적 자료들을 효과적으 로 이해할 수 있도록 돕는다. 이에 이 글에서는 질적 자료 분석에 있어서 대표적으로 활용할 수 있는 해던 매트릭스, SWOT 매트릭스, 시간 중심 매트릭스, 역할 중심 매트릭스 등을 소개 하면서 각 방법의 특징에 대하여 논의하고자 하였다. 또한, 실제적인 매트릭스 분석과정을 소 개함으로써 어떻게 매트릭스가 질적 연구 과정에 있어 활용될 수 있는지 논의하였다. 이를 통 하여 우리나라에 심층적으로 소개 되지 않았던 매트릭스 분석의 의미, 가능성 그리고 한계에 대하여 살펴보고자 하였다. 주제어: 질적자료분석, 매트릭스 분석, 질적연구 요약 * 교신저자. Email: minsungeun@naver.com 접수일(2016년 8월 31일), 수정일(2016년 10월 12일), 게재확정일(2016년 10월 15일)
(2015). . , 1(2), 99-122.
(2014). . , 147,
377-405.
, , (2015). .
, 54(4), 621-638.
.
, , , , , , , , ,
(2004). . : .
.
(2000). . , 18, 359-374.
, (2014). :
. , 12(1), 159-184.
(2015). . 2015
.
, , (2016). . , 2(1), 127-
155.
(2010) Mass Gathering Haddon Matrix
. , 10(2), 167-203.
Agnes, M. (2000). Webster’s new world college dictionary. Foster
City, CA: IDG Books
Worldwide.
Altschuld, J. W., & Witkin, B. R. (2000). From needs assessment
to action:
Transforming needs into solution strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1983). Ethnography: Principles
in practice.
188 2 2
London: Routledge.
Averill, J. B. (2002). Matrix analysis as complementary analytic
strategy in
qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 12(6),
855-866.
Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice
research. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cleveland, W. S. (1985). The elements of graphing data. Belmont,
CA: Wadsworth.
Crandall, D. P., Loucks-Horsley, S., Bauchner, J. E., Schmidt, W.
B., Eiseman, J.
W., Cox, P. L., Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Taylor, B. L.,
Goldberg,
J. A., Shive, G., Thompson, C. L., & Taylor, J. A. (1983).
People, policies
and practice: Examining the chain of school improvement. Maynard,
MA: The
Network, Inc.
Crotty, M. (1996). Phenomenology and nursing research. (, ,
2001). . : .
Dalin, P., Ayono, T., Biazen, A., & Dibaba, B. (1992). How
schools improve:
International report. Oslo, Norway: IMTEC.
Deljavan, R., Sadeghi-Bazargani, H., Fouladi, N., Arshi, S., &
Mohammadi, R.
(2012). Application of Haddon’s matrix in qualitative research
methodology:
An experience in burns epidemiology. International Journal of
General
Medicine, 5, 621-627.
Dollard, J. (1935). Criteria for the life history: With analyses of
six notable documents.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Giorgi, A., Fischer, W. F., & Eckartsberg, R. V. (1971).
Duquesne studies in
phenomenological psychology. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University
Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA:
Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of
grounded theory. Chicago,
IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Haddon, W. (1970). On the escape of tigers: An ecologic note.
American Journal of
Public Health, 60, 29–34.
Huberman, A. M. (1981). School-university collaboration supporting
school
| (Matrix Analysis) 189
improvement. Washington, DC: American University, Knowledge
Transfer
Institute.
Huberman, A. M. (1986). Engagements in educational change through
out the teaching
career. Geneva, Switzerland: University of Geneva.
Huberman, A. M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers.
Teachers College
Record, 91(1), 31-57.
Huberman, A. M. (1993). The lives of teachers. London:
Cassell.
Huberman, A. M. & Gather T. M. (1991). De la recherche la
pratique. Berne,
Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social
settings: A guide to qualitative
observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing
Company.
Mandelbaum, D. G. (1973). The study of life history: Ghandi.
Current
Anthropology, 14, 177-207.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Confirmatory factor analysis of
multitrait-multidehod data:
The construct validation of multidimensional self-concept
responses. Journal
of Personality, 58, 661-692.
Meadows, L. M., & Morse, J. M. (2001). Constructing evidence
within the
qualitative project. In J. M. Morse, J. M. Swanson, & A. J.
Kuzel (Eds.),
The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 187–200). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data
analysis. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles B. M., Huberman A. M., & Saldana J. (1994). Qualitative
data analysis. A
methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mostakas. C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
190 2 2
Nursing & Health, 23, 246-255.
Schatzman, L. (1991). Dimensional analysis: Note on an alternative
approach to
the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In D. R. Maines
(Ed.), Social
organization and socail process (pp. 303-314). Hawthorne, NY:
Aldine De
Gruyter.
medicalexecutivepost.com/2015/12/05/haddon-matrix-for-health-place-
injury-prevention/.
Smith, J. A., Flower P., & Larkin. M. (2009). Interpretative
phenomenological
analysis: Theory, method and research. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Srivastava, P. K., Kulshreshtha, K., Mohanty, C. S., Pushpangadan,
P., & Singh,
A. (2005). Stakeholder-based SWOT analysis for successful municipal
solid
waste management in Lucknow, India. Waste Management, 25(5),
531-537.
Straub, D. W., & Welke, R. J. (1998). Coping with systems risk:
Security planning
models for management decision-making. MIS Quarterly, 22(4),
441-469.
Strauss. A., & Corbin J. M. (1990) Grounded theory research:
Procedures, canons,
and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
van Kaam, A. L. (1966). Existential Foundations of Psychology.
Pittsburgh, PA:
Duquesne University Press.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. (, ,
1994).
. : .
Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Wertz, F. J. (2011). A phenomenological psychological approach to
trauma and resilience:
Five ways of doing qualitative analysis. Elmsford, NY: The Guilford
Press.
Yassine, A., Falkenburg, D. R., & Chelst, K. (1999).
Engineering design management:
An information structure approach. International Journal of
production research,
37(13), 2957-2975.
| (Matrix Analysis) 191
ABSTRACT
Sung-Eun Min Jinju National University of Education
This research is designed to define the concept, features, and
application
methodologies of Matrix Analysis. A matrix is defined as “a set of
numbers or terms
arranged in rows and columns; within which, or within and from
which, something
is originated, takes form, or develops”. It is used to identify
mutual relationship of
interaction among more than two major dimensions. Data analysis
consists of data
reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. As a
matrix is one of the
data display methods to facilitate data analysis with circular
procedures of data collection
and data analysis, it enables researchers to collect proper set of
data and also helps
readers understand extensive range of qualitative data more
efficiently. This research
also introduced the representative forms of matrix, including
Haddon Matrix, SWOT
Matrix, time-centered matrix, and theme-centered matrix, reviewing
features of each
method. The discussion also covered how matrix can be utilized in
qualitative studies,
by introducing the procedures of matrix analysis. With these
efforts, meaning, potentials
and restrictions of matrix analysis were reviewed, to provide
in-depth insights on the
topic that has not been covered much in previous researches.
Keywords: qualitative data analysis, matrix analysis, qualitative
research