14
㸯㸬ᗎㄽ ⌧௦࠸࠾ᬑ㐢ⓗ⏝୰ᚰⓗࡉ࡞ ᴫᛕࡦࠋࡁࡢࡘ᭷ຊೃ⿵⏤⌮ࠕࠊࡣreason 1 ࡤ࠼㐨ᚨ㛵ᐇᅾㄽ㸭ᐇᅾㄽࠊࡀ࠸ࡢࡃሙ㐨ᚨⓗ⌮⏤ Ꮡᅾㄽ࠺࠸ᙧ⩻ヂ㆟ㄽࡄࡍࠊࡣ⏤⌮ࠊᬑ㐢ⓗ ᴫᛕ⨨⌮◊✲⪅ࡕࡓ␚⏝ 2 ࡢࡇࠋ࡞࠺ࡓࠊࡣࠊࡤ࠼㇟ࡃつ⠊ⓗࡢࡢつ⠊ᛶ㸦normativityࡍࡣࡑࠊ࠸ࡀ ⌮⏤࠸ࡣ࠸⌮⏤ᥦ౪࠸ࡣ࠸ ᙧ⌮⏤⤖࠸ࡘࡧ࠺࠸ⅬᏑᶒጾ㐨ᚨつ⠊ᛶ⪃ࡇࠋ࠺つ⠊ᛶࠊࡣ࠶ࡀࡢ✀࡞⏤⌮ࡢ࠺࠸ṇᙜᶒጾⓎ ⏤⌮ࡣ࠺࠸ࡋࡑࠊ㐨ᚨⓗ⪃៖㡯ጇᙜ⏤⌮࡞ ࠺࠸つ⠊ᛶㄝ✲ࡣᴟⓗ ⏤⌮ࠊࡇࡓࡗ࠸࠺⏤⌮ࡓ 㛵㐃ࡓࡋࡢ࡞Raz 1999, 354-53 つ⠊ᛶ⏤⌮ࡣࡢࡇ࠺࠸࡞࠺௬ㄝ⌧ࠊࡣ ࡢࡇࡀࡔࠋ௬ㄝ⮬యጇᙜᛶㄽᮏ✏┠ࡢࠋ࠸࡞ࡣᮏ✏ၥ㢟ࡢ⏤⌮ࡣࡢᴫᛕⓗᬑ㐢 㸬㸬 ࢸ࠺࠸ࠊࡃ࡞ࡣ㑏ඖ 㸬㸬 㸬㸬 ࢸ࠺࠸ࡔࢮࡢࡇࠋࡀࡘ⊂❧ ࡔ࠸࡞࠸ ࠋ࠺ࡢࢬ❧࡞࠺ࡓࡀࡔࡢࡓࡗࡇࡢࡑ⮬యࡀ⏤⌮ࡣᴫᛕᇶ♏ⓗ㑏ඖ࠸࡞ࡁᴫᛕࡇ࠺࠸ࡋࡎࡑ⏤⌮ࠋ࠸࡞ࡣ⮬యᴫᛕ ศᯒຍࠊࡣࡗ࠶ ࠋ࠸࡞ࡣࡃࡋࡀ࡞ࡋᐇ㝿ࠊࡣつ⠊ᛶ㆟ㄽ࠸࠾⌮⏤୰ᚰࡃ࠾ㄽ⪅ ࡕࡓ東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度) pp.130 143

0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

reason 1

2

normativity

Raz 1999, 354-5 3

東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度)pp.130-143

Page 2: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

Scanlon 1998 Dancy 2003

Parfit 2011

normative reason justifying reason4

5

reasons that explain why

explanatory reason

131規範理由は還元不能な概念なのか

Page 3: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

6

making-it-the-case relation

cf. Alvarez 2010,

32-7

7

counts in favour of

132 東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度)

Page 4: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

Scanlon 1998, 17

R P R P

Dancy 2003, 101

8

133規範理由は還元不能な概念なのか

Page 5: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

Smith 1994

Dancy 2000 9

134 東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度)

Page 6: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

value goodness

R P R P

value-first Way 2013, 28

Brunero 2012;

Way 2013

10

evaluative

deontic

rightness

e.g. Dancy 2000; Smith 2005;

Schroeder 2009; Tappolet 2014 11

1

135規範理由は還元不能な概念なのか

Page 7: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

2

3

12

13

P P

cf. Streumer 2007

14

consideration

you

136 東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度)

Page 8: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

have to be able to reason with reasons Searle 2001, 104 15

Generalized Internalism

Requirement

Kolodny 2005, 548-549

P R

Brunero 2012, 822

R P R P

Broome 2003, 2013

137規範理由は還元不能な概念なのか

Page 9: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

P

ought truths

Broome 2003, 31

R P

16

cf. Finlay 2007; Parfit 201117

18

outweigh

138 東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度)

Page 10: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

Broome 2013, 53 19

R P R P

P P

weighing explanation for- role

20

pro toto pro tanto Broome 2013, 50-3

pro tanto

139規範理由は還元不能な概念なのか

Page 11: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

pro toto

cf. Brunero

2012, 809-12 21

Kearns and Star 2008, 42-4

Broome 2013,

54 R

R

R P R P

140 東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度)

Page 12: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

1 Reason

2 The Possibility of Altruism Nagel 19703 2011 Raz 2011, 5-64 good reason e.g. Dancy2000

5

6

7

Smith 19948

141規範理由は還元不能な概念なのか

Page 13: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

9

10 Brunero 2012, 820-1

11

cf. Schroeder 2011

12 4 thickdeterminate 5

61 3

13

bluff / brow-beating

Williams 1979, 87 95-96; cf. Williams 1995, 39-4014

15

16

cf. Schroeder 200817

e.g.Blackburn 199818

19

20

21 Dancy 2003, 95

Alvarez, Maria. 2010. Kinds of Reasons, Oxford University Press.Blackburn, Simon. 1998. Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford University Press.

142 東京大学哲学研究室『論集』33号(2014年度)

Page 14: 0d ( #. #ä c 4O Y + ^ + Õ ^ b · 2016. 4. 27. · 6 " Mb ¦ @6 9 b>&6 8c Mb>' P1ß_ PKZ0d (#.#äí1 Â#.#ä g b z m ÝSMG\v \! 6~: S\

Broome, John. 2003. “Reasons.” In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz,Jay R. Wallace, Philip Pettit, Samuel Scheffler, and Michael Smith (eds.), 28–55. Oxford University Press.

. 2013. Rationality Through Reasoning, Blackwell.Brunero, John. 2012. “Reasons as Explanations,” Philosophical Studies 165, 805–24.Dancy, Jonathan. 2000. Practical Reality, Oxford University Press.

. 2003. “What Do Reasons Do?” The Southern Journal of Philosophy XLI, 95–113.Finlay, Stephen. 2007. “Four Faces of Moral Realism,” Philosophy Compass 2, 820–49.Kearns, Stephen, and Daniel Star. 2008. “Reasons: Explanations or Evidence?” Ethics 119, 31–56.Kolodny, Niko. 2005. “Why Be Rational?” Mind 114, 509–63.Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism, Princeton University Press.Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters, Oxford University Press.Raz, Joseph. 1999. “Explaining Normativity: On Rationality and the Justification of Reason,” Ratio 12,

354–79.———. 2011. From Normativity to Responsibility, Oxford University Press.Scanlon, Thomas M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other, Harvard University Press.Schroeder, Mark. 2008. Being For, Oxford University Press.

. 2011. “Ought, Agents, and Actions.” Philosophical Review 120, 1–41.Schroeder, Scott Andrew. 2009. “Divorcing the Good and the Right,” Harvard University. (Ph. D.

Dissertation).Searle, John R. 2001. Rationality in Action, The MIT Press.Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem, Blackwell.

. 2005. “Meta-Ethics,” In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Frank Jackson and Michael Smith (eds.), 3–30. Oxford University Press.

Streumer, Bart. 2007. “Reasons and Impossibility,” Philosophical Studies 136, 351–84.Tappolet, Christine. 2014. “The Normativity of Evaluative Concepts.” In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics.

Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan, Volume 2, Anne Reboul (ed.), Springer-Verlag, 39–54..

Way, Jonathan. 2013. “Value and Reasons to Favour,” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics vol.8, Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford University Press, 27-49.

Williams, Bernard. 1979. “Internal and External Reasons, with Postscript ” In Varieties of Practical Reasoning, Elijah Millgram (ed.), The MIT Press, 77–97.

. 1995. “Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame,” In Making Sense of Humanity, Cambridge University Press, 35–45.

143規範理由は還元不能な概念なのか