1

Chaiyaphum province, Chaiyaphum province, The 3The 3rd rd Happiness city in Happiness city in Thailand.Thailand.

21.ทิ�วทิ�ศน์�สวย (อุ�ทิยาน์แห่�งชาติ�ป่�าห่�น์งาม อุ.เทิพสถิ�ติย� จั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�

31.ทิ�วทิ�ศน์�สวย (อุ�ทิยาน์แห่�งชาติ�ป่�าห่�น์งาม อุ.เทิพสถิ�ติย� จั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�

42 .รวยป่�าให่ญ่� (หิ�นเจดี�ย์ , หิ�นโขลงช้�าง อุ�ทย์านแหิ�งช้าติ�ภู�แลนคา อุ�าเภูอุเมื�อุงจั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�

53 .ม!ช"างห่ลาย (แหิ�รอุบบ�านนาคานหิ ก อุ. หินอุงบ วแดีง จั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�)

64 . ดีอุกไมื�งามื (ท��งดีอุกกระเจ�ย์ว อุ$าเภูอุเทิพสถิ�ติย� จั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�

75 .ล%อุน์ามว!ระบุ�ร�ษ (อุน์�สาวร!ย�เจั"าพ�อุพญ่าแล ผู้�"สร"างเม%อุงช�ยภู�ม� อุ.เม%อุง จั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�)

86 .ส�ดยอุกผู้"าไห่ม (ผู้"าไห่ม อุ.บุ"าน์เขว"า จั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�)

97 .พระให่ญ่�ทิราวด! (ห่ลวงพ�อุให่ญ่�ใบุเสมา ว�ดคอุน์สวรรค� จั�งห่ว�ดช�ยภู�ม�)

10

By Surin Cortong and Sirinan By Surin Cortong and Sirinan ThanudcaThanudca

The Result Using of Google Drive The Result Using of Google Drive & Weblog and Traditional Method & Weblog and Traditional Method

Learning on the Information Learning on the Information Technology for life Subject forTechnology for life Subject for

EnhancingEnhancing the System the System ThinkingThinking of Undergraduate Students in of Undergraduate Students in

Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University. Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University.

11

IntroductionIntroduction::

- The information age. ICT and knowledge has expandedhas expanded. - The importance of education reformeducation reform.

- Teaching using innovative innovative technology technology and educational media and learning activities- The National Education Act 1999, Section 65Section 65: to encourage the students encourage the students to use technology : Acquired knowledge and knowledge and skills skills and also with the pursuit of knowledge. Section 66Section 66: to encourage students to develop : to use technology to use technology to educationeducation.

12

- Rajabhat University Act Act 2004:22004:2), the mission of the Rajabhat University was an institution of higher education for local education for local developmentdevelopment, close contact with the community the community advantage. "People People UniversityUniversity“- learning Conditions and problems of education in problems of education in higher educationhigher education.

13

Research ObjectivesResearch Objectives

1.To compare the learning compare the learning achievement achievement by using Google drive&weblog lesson and the traditional method learning on the Information technology for life subject.

2.To study the satisfaction of study the satisfaction of students students after studying the Google drives&weblog lesson.

3) To study the students’ opinions study the students’ opinions through the systems thinking on Google drive& weblog lesson.

14

3.1 Population:3.1 Population:      Include undergraduate student who were enrollment of information technology for life in second semester of academic year 2013 at Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University. 30 students department of law, 30 students of interdisciplinary for local development programs and general science 60 people, including 120 students. .

15

3.2) The samples:3.2) The samples: - 30 students (IDLD) , enrollment of ICT for life subject in second semester of academic year 2013 were classified as the control group control group learn by traditional method.

- The experimental group experimental group were program law of 30 students taught by Google drives &weblogs.

- The third group 30 students of general science program selected by purposive sampling used for tryouttryout of effectiveness index effectiveness index process.

16

3.3) Variables:3.3) Variables:

1) The independent variables    1) The Google drives and weblogs lesson   2) The traditional method learning. 2) The dependent variables 1) Learning achievement          2)The satisfaction in learning.          3)The opinion on systems thinking. 3) Duration for data collection within 1 semester.

4)The contents for Google drives 4)The contents for Google drives &weblogs eight lessons: &weblogs eight lessons:

1. ICT Basic knowledge 2. Computer systems. 3.Computer network. 4. Database management. 5.Computer software. 6.Using Microsoft office Word 7. Using Microsoft office Excel 8. Using Google drive &weblog.

17

Research framework Research framework

18

1. 1. Google drive and weblogs lesson.

2. The traditional learning method.

Independent Independent variablesvariables

Dependent Dependent variablesvariables

1. Learning achievement. 2. Students’ satisfaction. 3.The opinion on system thinking.

The Analysis state: The Analysis state: 1) On the Google drive & weblog lessons of IT for Life subject.2) On the lessons of traditional method of IT for Life subject. 3)The learning achievement test before and after classes multiple choices of 50 items. 4) Questionnaires of learners satisfaction towards using of weblogs rating scale 5 levels.5) The opinion for systems thinking test. rating scale 5 levels..

19

5.2 Research Tools: 5.2 Research Tools:

1.Analysis2.Design3.Development4.Implementation5.Evaluation

20

1.Identify problem 2.Objectives3.Constraints4.State alternative5 .Selection6.Implementation7 .Evaluation8 .Modification5.2 Research planning

The Design state: The Design state:

Yes

No

21

2.Objectives

3.Constrains

4.State alternative

5.Selection6.Implementa

tion7.Evaluation

Start

Introduction

PretestMain MenuSub

menu1-8Exercises

Finish

Posttest8.Modificati

on

1.Identify problem

Confirm

Exit

Exit

Learning process

System thinkin

gADDIE

The development state: The development state:

1.) Generated contents on the topic of the presentation 8 folders. 2.) Each folder of 1-8 generated content (Spreadsheet) 8 folders. 3.) Learning as a motion picture or video to add (Upload) on Google plus on the URL. youtube.com such as a group of ICT for life. 4.) Creating a quiz at the end of a lesson to all 8 chapters and each chapter 10 items and create a pretest and posttest total of 50 items.

22

5.) The 3 experts to verify 3 experts to verify on the contents of Google drive.

6.) The effectiveness index test (Try out) effectiveness index test (Try out) 3 steps and results of E1/E2 85.14/87.66.

7.)The 3 experts to verify again 3 experts to verify again prior to treat 16 hrs. and then make treatmenttreatment to experiments group(law students) and control group (interdisciplinary of local development students)

23

The Implementation stateThe Implementation state::

1.) Evaluation of the learning learning achievement pretest and posttest.achievement pretest and posttest.

2.) Evaluation of the satisfaction of the satisfaction of the students students on the Google drive&weblog lesson.

3.) Evaluation of students’ opinion test students’ opinion test on the systems thinking of the lesson.

24

The Evaluation stateThe Evaluation state::

25

Assessment items M S.D. Result

1.Contents and management 4.75 0.44 Highest

2.Image, Language, Sound 4.47 0.51 High

3. Contents and management on alphabet and color

4.48 0.55 High

4.Learning achievement test 4.74 0.41 Highest

5. Learning management 4.73 0.45 Highest

6. Manual for using learning lesson 4.46 0.50 High

Total mean 4.61 0.45 Highest

Detailed for contents quality Detailed for contents quality E.I.try outE.I.try out

Lesson design quality Lesson design quality E.I.testE.I.test

26

Assessment items M S.D. Result

1.Part 1: Content 4.53 0.21 Excellent

2.Introduction 4.55 0.31 Excellent

3.Contents part 4.45 0.42 Good

4.Summary part 4.63 0.32 Excellent

5.Part 2: Graphic and design 4.50 0.42 Excellent

6.Part 3: Technical 4.48 0.10 Good

Total mean 4.52 0.30 Excellent

The learning achievement The learning achievement pretest for the experimental pretest for the experimental and the control group and the control group

27

Group test M S.D t p

Control Group 37.90 6.22 .28 .78

Experimental Group 38.33 5.59 2.42

Table 3 the mean scores of pretest the control group the mean score at 37.90 (SD. 6.22) the experimental group. Mean score at 38.33 (SD.5.59) t.value equal to 0.28 for p. value equal to 0.78, which is the p-value the p-value greater than 0.05 greater than 0.05 indicates that the assumptions it. Thats’ mean scores pretest of the control group and the experimental group no differenceno difference.

28

The comparison of learning The comparison of learning achievement posttest scores achievement posttest scores

Group test M S.D t p

Control Group 42.77 3.89 6.64 .00**

Experimental Group 47.50 o.98

Table 4 the mean scores of posttest the control group the mean score at 42.77 (SD. 3.89) the experimental group. Mean score at 47.50 (SD.0.98) t.value at 6.64 and p. value equal to 0.00, which is the p-value the p-value lesser than lesser than 0.05 0.05 it is hypothesized that the mean it is hypothesized that the mean posttest scores on after learning posttest scores on after learning between the control group and the between the control group and the experimental group experimental group difference were difference were significant at the 0.05 significant at the 0.05 level. level.

The satisfaction of 1st year law The satisfaction of 1st year law student on Google drive lessonstudent on Google drive lesson. . (15 (15 items)items)

29

Assessment items M S.D. Result1.Content, easy to understand. 4.40 0.63 high

2.The learner enjoy on the lesson. 4.55 0.31 highest

3. The learner can select any lesson to learn for sequence.

4.45 0.42 high

13.The image, animation are clarify and suitable to the lesson.

4.53 0.55 highest

14.The co-responding suitable to learner.

4.53 0.72 highest

15.Display the learner progressive.

4.48 0.60 high

Total mean 4.58 0.57 highest

30

Assessment items M S.D. Result1.Systems thinking are useful. 4.48 0.25 high2.Systems thinking person make a good vision and problem solving.

4.53 0.15 highest

3.Systems thinking person make advance correlation logical thinking

4.38 0.48 high

13.Systems thinking make clarify communication.

4.40 0.33 high

14.I always look forward in various way.

4.45 0.44 high

15.I always think from the cause to

the reason.4.60 0.45 highest

Total mean 4.50 0.38 highest

The opinions for systems thinking on The opinions for systems thinking on the Google the Google

Summary and discussion Summary and discussion

31

6.1) Learning achievement of learner on Google drives&weblog, posttest posttest higher than pretest higher than pretest statistically significant at the 0.05 level significant at the 0.05 level consistent with the research of the Kanchana phaukkhongsri et al (2012) Nathapon Buaurai (2010). Yupavilai Watheepetch (2010) Srisakun Srisarakham (2011).

Satisfaction 1st year of law student program, the total mean was at the at the highest levelhighest level(M=4.58) (SD=0.57) that based on the assumptions.

Sub-items were found to be satisfactory at 4.37 to 4.68, indicating that the students were the students were satisfiedsatisfied with lessons to learn on the Google drive&weblogs. Due to Due to learning tools for the modern. learning tools for the modern.

32

Summary and discussion Summary and discussion

33

6.3) The opinion of 1st year students in the field of law towards a systems thinking learning on the Google drive&weblogs, a total total mean was at the highest levelmean was at the highest level (M=(M= 4.50, SD=0.38).

Summary and discussion Summary and discussion

Suggestions on the Ed.Tech& Suggestions on the Ed.Tech& Comm Comm fieldfield. .

6.4.1) There were also various other forms of technology. Application of optimal design can be used in teaching social media, or lessons on a network drive, such as lessons on others of Google apps.

34

35

Suggestions for teachingSuggestions for teaching::

6.4.2.1)The social media or lessons on the network such as Google drive&weblog tutorials on this blog. To create a portfolio of learners, the self-knowledge through materials, technology for creating conditions of learning. The teachers must have the The teachers must have the more time to constructmore time to construct thethe interactive interactive lesson lesson over computer network on the web and encourage learners to curiosity encourage learners to curiosity and search and search for self-knowledgefor self-knowledge.

36

Suggestions for teaching: Suggestions for teaching:

6.4.2.2) Teaching on social media. or lessons on a network drive, such as lessons on Google&weblogs. Teachers Teachers should be prepared should be prepared and the students the students are ready. And learning process process should be flexible with the timingshould be flexible with the timing. To construct knowledge, self-potential.

37

Suggestions for teachingSuggestions for teaching::

6.4.2.3) Navigating the class should be on social media or lessons on a network drive, such as lessons on others of Google apps lessons on others of Google apps to apply to the other subjectsother subjects. That depends on the nature of the material itself. To adjust the thought adjust the thought process of the students to construct knowledge process of the students to construct knowledge for themselves.

6.5.1) The Development on Google drive, should take care for the different level of intelligence of the studentsintelligence of the students.

6.5.2) Should drive through development on Google&weblogs courses that have the people learn or I do not the people learn or I do not understand understand from studying normal. Students will learn to supplement lesson online through social media.

38

Suggestions for the next Suggestions for the next thesisthesis::

39

6.5.3) Lessons on Google drives&weblogs, should be used in a course where the instructor wants the students to practice wants the students to practice their skillstheir skills. Prior to the actual practice. And subjects at risk of harm in the practice.

**********************************

Suggestions for the next Suggestions for the next thesisthesis::

Sample e-Learning on IT for Sample e-Learning on IT for Life subjectLife subject

40

e-Portfolio e-Portfolio

41

e-Portfolio (1e-Portfolio (1stst IDLD IDLD students)students)

42

e-Portfolio (1e-Portfolio (1stst Law Law students)students)

43

e-Portfolioe-Portfolio

44

PretestPretest

45

Google drive lesson 1Google drive lesson 1

46

Google drive lesson 2Google drive lesson 2

47

PosttestPosttest

48

49

By Surin Cortong and Sirinan By Surin Cortong and Sirinan ThanudcaThanudca

The Result Using of Google The Result Using of Google Drive&Weblog and Traditional Drive&Weblog and Traditional

Method Learning on the Method Learning on the Information Technology for life Information Technology for life

Subject forSubject for EnhancingEnhancing the System the System ThinkingThinking of Undergraduate of Undergraduate

Students in Students in Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University. Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University.