1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    1/11

    cin de una idea, como anticipo, el si-guiente estudio

    Se iniciaba entonces, una aproxi-macin al dibujo versus arquitecturade los siguientes arquitectos: Mies vander Rohe, Le Corbusier, Oscar Nie-meyer, Alejandro de la Sota y FrankLloyd Wright.

    Vamos a explorar ms a fondo aho-ra la obra del maestro brasileo, Os-car Niemeyer, a travs de su dibujo.Partimos de la afirmacin de que po-cos arquitectos han sido tan militan-tes en cuanto a valorar la importanciadel dibujo en su creacin arquitect-

    nica, como podremos comprobar acontinuacin, y no slo por la ingen-te cantidad de testimonios grficos, si-no por sus reflexiones acerca del di-bujo como medio creativo.

    En ste sentido, considero un privi-legio haber sido testigo de una expre-sin plstica-comunicativa sin prece-

    El siguiente estudio es continuaciny desarrollo de la comunicacin pre-sentada al Congreso Internacional deExpresin Grfica Arquitectnica deMadrid de 2008, con el ttulo:

    88

    En esa comunicacin se pretenda res-ponder a la pregunta del ttulo, es decir,existe una relacin biunvoca, entreel dibujo del arquitecto y su obra ar-quitectnica?, o, por el contrario, pue-de haber una arquitectura sencilla y undibujo de proyecto barroco, preciosistay en consecuencia contradictorio?.

    El texto continuaba diciendo:

    De la misma manera cabe preguntarse side una arquitectura con gusto por el de-talle elaborado, el adorno, etc, se infiereun dibujo tambin complejo, arabesque,sobredibujado.Los objetivos iniciales de esta comunica-cin eran muy ambiciosos, a saber: se pre-tenda explorar la idea globalmente. Enseguida se vio que el campo era inmenso,que haba material mas que suficiente pa-ra desarrollar una tesis doctoral. Aco-tamos el objeto de estudio/ campo a unospocos maestros de la arquitectura, de elec-cin subjetiva, dejando para mas adelan-te los arquitectos en un principio inclui-dos en el resumen de sta comunicacin.Sirva como ejemplo pues, como explora-

    1. Fotografa del autor.

    ACERCA DEL DIBUJO DE OSCAR NIEMEYER

    Manuel Franco Taboada

    Dibujo sencillo, versus, arquitectura sencilla?

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    2/11

    dentes en la historia de la arquitectu-ra, como ha sido la extraordinaria oca-sin que tuve de conocer a Oscar Nie-meyer, asistiendo en directo a laexplicacin pormenorizada de su con-cepto arquitectnico, de su obra, de sulegado, a travs del dibujo.

    Llegamos a su casa-estudio de Co-pacabana, en Ro de Janeiro, tempra-

    no por la maana, cuando el contaba92 aos Hoy tiene 101, y fue sor-prendente percibir su enorme energa,que difunda con clara nitidez. Fu-mando un cigarro y con las manos enlos tirantes, nos acompa al interiorde su despacho el mismo que se veen la fotografa tomada el ao pasa-do, junto a Alvaro Siza, y en la queera omnipresente la preciosa fotogra-fa del fondo, de la cual comentar al-go ms adelante.

    Ver a Niemeyer dibujar de arqui-tectura, en directo y a sus 92 aos, essin duda un privilegio, una oportuni-dad nica que la casualidad, la suerte,me permiti disfrutar. Y digo dibujarde arquitectura y no hablar de ar-quitectura, porque Niemeyer no sabecomunicarse, expresar lo ms profun-do de su pensamiento arquitectnicosin la asistencia del dibujo, sin el re-curso de la mano, del rotulador negrosobre el papel blanco.

    Negro sobre blanco.

    El contraste mas puro, la verdadsin tapujos, sin sombras, sin recurriral artificio.

    Blanco y negro.La forma pura expresada en lneas

    que refleja la idea matriz, eso que de-fine tan bien su arquitectura, la lneaes la forma: es la arquitectura.

    1/ NIEMEYER, Oscar, Meu Sosia e eu. 1992, pg. 33.2/ dem, pp. 35.3/ dem, pp. 33.

    La relacin entre DIBUJO yARQUITECTURA

    A Arquitectura se exibe desde o primeirotrao.

    Arquitectura que busca la belleza a travsde la imaginacin, sin caer en pequeosdetalles, actuando sobre la estructura, enla cual se sumerge y exhibe desde el pri-mer trazo. 1

    Cuando Niemeyer dice que su arqui-tectura se sumerge y exhibe en la es-tructura, nas quais se insere e se exi-be desde o primeiro trao, nos esthablando no slo de los primeros pasosde la construccin, sino de los primerostrazos del dibujo. En el primer momen-to de la concepcin, su dibujo directo,mnimo, define la estructura que ser alfinal, la esencia de la propia arquitec-tura. Se examinarem o Congreso deBrasilia ou os palcios nela realizados

    vero que, terminadas sus estruturas, aarquitetura ja estava presente. 2Para Niemeyer, la belleza de su ar-

    quitectura, frente a la arquitectura fun-cionalista, reside en la libertad de lasformas, en la levedad, variedad y cre-atividad que les confiere mediante eluso del hormign, y que sus dibujosexpresan a la perfeccin. Cita a Bau-delaire cuando dice: Linattendu,lirrgularit , la surprise et letonne-ment sont una partie essentielle et unecaractristique de la beaut. 3

    i examinamos por ejemplo, el dibu-jo para la sede de Mondadori, a la vezque el propio edificio, o su fotografacannica, observamos una definicincasi total del mismo; el dibujo repre-senta mediante una lnea fina, sinsombras la pureza de formas del edi-ficio, en el cual los detalles apenas exis-ten y, si existen, carecen de relevancia.

    3 y 4

    2

    5 y 6

    2. Fotografa del libro: 100 por 100 Niemeyer.3 y 4. Plaza de los tres poderes, Brasilia, 1955-60.5 y 6. Sede de Mondadori, 1974.

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    3/11

    que desprecia el dibujo tcnico, hastaconsiderarlo prescindible. Intentar en-contrar documentacin exhaustiva desus proyectos, planos de definicinconstructiva, es una tarea ardua. Pa-rece como que no hubiera paso inter-medio, entre los dibujos de figuraciny la obra construida

    Niemeyer sostiene que muchas ve-

    ces resuelve un proyecto slo pensan-do, sin dibujar (como deca Sota, quel haca), pensando, imaginando comoes, como debe ser, pero que otras ve-ces lo hace dibujando: La base de laarquitectura son el dibujo y la cabeza.Cuando llego a una solucin, con losdibujos ya definidos, empiezo a escri-bir un texto explicando la arquitec-tura, y si no encuentro argumentos alleer el texto, vuelvo al tablero porquefalta algo. 6

    do que la libertad y el dibujo, son fun-damentales en la vida del hombre. 4

    Cuando habla del dibujo, desenho,Niemeyer defiende la necesidad depracticar el dibujo figurativo, de la fi-gura humana, argumentando que ledar la habilidad manual del dibujo amano alzada:

    Ah, como mgico ver surgir na folhabranca de papel um palcio, um museu,

    uma bela figura de mulher! Como as des-ejo e gosto de desenh-las! Como as sin-to nas curvas da minha arquitectura! 5

    Y constantemente en sus libros nospresenta al lado de fotografas, dibu-jos de naturaleza libre.

    Podramos decir que el dibujo a ma-no alzada es tan importante para l,

    Las lneas del dibujo son las aristas dela futura forma estructural.

    Arquitectura tambin sencilla, sindetalles, estructural, monumental.

    La importancia del DibujoEl dibujo resulta esencial para el arqui-tecto, incluyendo el dibujo figurativo, quese ha reemplazado en las escuelas desdehace algn tiempo por la tcnica y los or-

    denadores. Un nio con talento hace unosdibujos fantsticos a los ocho o diez aos,que una mala enseanza y el conoci-miento de los clsicos van a vulgarizar deforma definitiva.

    El dibujo es fantstico. Sirve para casi to-do. Ver dibujar a un nio es siempre bo-nito porque hay libertad. No tiene nadaen la cabeza, es algo espontneo. De mo-

    4/ NIEMEYER, Oscar, 100 Aos de Arquitectura. (Oh, cun mgi-co es ver que salen en hoja de papel blanco, un palacio, unmuseo, una bella figura de mujer! Como el deseo y el gusto dedibujo, como el sentir de las curvas de mi arquitectura!).5/ arquia/documental 1/disco 1. Oscar NIEMEYER. Un arquitectocomprometido. Blgica, 2000; Brasil, 2003.6/ dem anterior.

    90

    7. Dibujo de Niemeyer. 8. Detalle del dibujo realizado para el autor.9. Fotografa de la Catedral de Brasilia.

    8

    9

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    4/11

    La influencia del paisaje y dela forma femenina en su obra

    En Minha Arquitectura, Niemeyerescribe:

    No o ngulo recto que me atrai, nema linha recta, dura e inflexvel, criada pe-lo homem. O que me atrai a curva li-vre e sensual, a curva que encontro nasmontanhas do meu pas, no curso si-nuoso dos seus rios, nas ondas do mar,no corpo da mulher preferida. De cur-vas feito todo o universo, o universocurvo de Einstein.

    Son muchos los dibujos de Niemeyersobre mujeres, sobre las curvas de lasmujeres podramos decir; y muchos losdibujos de edificios que son tratados conla misma sinuosidad y que nos recuer-dan enseguida la forma femenina.

    En una ocasin, Le Corbusier le di-jo a Niemeyer que tena dentro de slas montaas de Ro.

    Niemeyer replica a esto que escierto en parte, que el ambiente enel que viva es el culpable, pero noslo las montaas de Ro sino suaspraias brancas, suas montanhas mo-numentais, suas velhas igrejas ba-rrocas, suas belas mulheres bronce-

    adas Tudo que me emocionava..De hecho, la fotografa de su despa-cho, juega con la indefinicin, con elequvoco de unas formas que no sesabe si son montanhas o mulheresbronceadas. 7

    Esa indefinicin, sin duda premedi-tada, la vemos tambin en ste dibu-

    jo, que seala la relacin formal entrepaisaje y forma femenina:

    Tambin nos atrae la mujer. De modo quemi arquitectura no es lo que deca Le Cor-busier, sino lo que deca Malraux, que te-na un museo particular donde guardabatodo lo que haba visto y amado en la vida.

    Sin querer pienso que ese que est dentrode m (su sosia) es ms canalla que yo, so-lo piensa en canalladas, as que tiene lasideas ms absurdas. Y a veces quiere quehaga cosas que no son posibles. Hay quecontenerse. As que l me lleva hacia la ar-quitectura, le gustan las curvas, le gusta lamujer, le gustan las cosas ms fascinantes,no?. Creo que es eso, y creo que es la ba-se de la vida. Soy un bicho como otro cual-quiera. Slo pienso en eso. Sin mujer elhombre, no tiene ninguna razn para vi-vir. Es inevitable. La mujer es la compa-era del hombre, es indispensable. Es lareina de los hombres. Fantstica, no?.

    A pesar de la enorme importancia

    que para Niemeyer tiene la belleza fe-menina, y quiz en segundo lugar, laarquitectura, debemos colocar sin sa-ber si antes o despus, su preocupa-cin por los desfavorecidos, los olvi-dados por los acaudalados, expresadocon sus propias palabras.

    En una ocasin declar ante losalumnos de una escuela de arquitec-tura, que el incluira tres objetivos ensu formacin: su preparacin para es-cribir y con ello poder explicar sus pro-yectos; su capacidad para dibujar y as

    poder realizar sus proyectos, y su pre-ocupacin por alcanzar mayor igual-dad social. sta es una verdadera pre-ocupacin existencial para Niemeyer;el da que lo visit en su estudio, di-jo: La arquitectura es importante, pe-ro lo ms importante es la vida y la jus-ticia social para las personas.

    7/ NIEMEYER, Oscar. As Curvas do Tempo. Editora Revan, Rio deJaneiro, 2000.

    10. Dibujo del Catlogo de la Exposicin: Niemeyer,Fundacin Telefnica. 2007.

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    5/11

    92

    11. Dibujo realizado para el autor por Oscar Niemeyeren su estudio de Ro.12. Ministerio del Ejrcito (Brasilia).13. Teatro Popular en Niteri.14. Detalle, retocado de dibujo de Niemeyer.15. Fotografa que preside su despacho en Copacabana.16. Dibujo de Niemeyer.17. Dibujo de Niemeyer (Meu sosia e eu).

    11

    15

    16 17

    14

    13

    12

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    6/11

    La arquitectura brasilea de los aos40, 50 y 60 es acusada por los crticoscomo M. Bill de formalista, alejndo-se de los conceptos arquetpicos de laarquitectura racional, tomando los ele-mentos formales que le interesan, perousndolos como frmulas convencio-nales, como recetas estticas, simplifi-cando el repertorio racionalista, empo-breciendo el resultado.

    La discusin se centra en si la ex-periencia brasilea, es autnticamentemoderna o por el contrario se ha trans-formado en una interpretacin sui ge-neris mezclada con lo vernculo o au-tctono. La casa de Niemeyer en Ro,de 1953, es para Benvolo una gigan-tesca moldura decorativa.

    Josep M Botey, en el libro de GGsobre Niemeyer cuenta la ancdota deque Mies, visitando la casa, comentes una construccin pequea, muybonita , pero irrepetible, exclamacinque divirti mucho a Niemeyer quedeclar: Pero cmo puede ser repe-tible una casa que tiene un entornoconcreto, unas curvas de nivel dondeasentarse, una luz, un paisaje...? C-mo puede ser repetible?. En ste sen-tido, Niemeyer se coloca muy por de-lante de su tiempo, anticipndose a laarquitectura que respeta el lugar, ar-quitectura para la que el sitio, el ge-nius loci, es fundamental.

    Para Manfredo Tafuri, la arquitec-tura de Niemeyer o Costa debe englo-barse dentro del expresionismo, cali-ficndola de escenogrfica y afirmando

    que en Brasilia demuestra los lmitesde su potica, terminando en s mismay repitindose hasta la nusea. Las des-

    tructivas palabras del crtico contin-an calificando el plano de Brasilia deinfantil y la arquitectura de Niemeyerdonde lo gratuito se tie de sofisti-cacin ciertamente espectacular, perode veleidad superflua. 8

    ParaJ. M. Montaner la arquitectu-ra latinoamericana, lleg a la moder-nidad por su propia cuenta, y a pesarde que la impronta de LC est muypresente en obras de las primeras van-guardias, los paradigmas formales deLC, estn tomados con total libertad

    e incluso pervertidos totalmente.9

    En esta pequea seleccin historio-grfica de la obra brasilea, desde elBenvolo de 1974-87, pasando por elTafuri de 1976 hasta el Montaner de1999, vemos como la opinin que so-bre el fenmeno se ha dado, ha idomodificndose y dulcificndose en eltiempo, hasta la actual de Montaner,menos rgida y ms liberalizadora.

    Montaner, en el libro arriba citado,afirma que Niemeyer, inmediatamen-te despus de las vanguardias, es unode los primeros arquitectos que des-de una actitud renovadora y progre-sista, pone totalmente en duda los prin-cipios del estricto funcionalismo enarquitectura. Su obra es ante todo es-cultrica y expresiva.

    Realmente se adelant a su tiempo,a corrientes posteriores que los crti-cos han denominado brutalistas y ex-

    8/ TAFURI, m. Dal Co, F. Arquitectura Contempornea. Aguilar.Madrid 1978.9/ MONTANER, Josep Mara. Despus del MM. Arquitectura de lasegunda mitad del siglo XX. GG. Barc. 1999.

    Breve resea historiogrfica de la obra de Niemeyer

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    7/11

    Oscar Niemeyer ha tenido una influenciaprofunda y duradera en mi obra. He visi-tado muchas de sus obras en Brasil, y hetenido tambin el privilegio de habermereunido con l en varias ocasiones.Creo que su originalidad, su sensibilidadespacial y su talento virtuoso son absolu-tamente nicos y no superados. Su obrame inspir y me anim a seguir mi propiocamino en la arquitectura y a seguirle a len la bsqueda de una fluidez total en to-

    das las escalas. 10

    Para Alvaro Siza, Niemeyer apo-y la reconquista de la libertad cre-ativa, la conjuncin de tradicin ymodernidad, y rememora la fasci-nacin que producan en su genera-cin los diseos del brasileo: Pila-res como puntos, paredes como finaslneas ondulantes, casi disuelta la for-ma, con todo tan ntida y tan nuevay tan evocadora. 11

    Renzo Piano record que Niemeyerestaba en el jurado del concurso don-

    de le asignaron a l y al ingls RichardRogers la construccin del centro Pom-pidou de Pars.

    Agreg que el brasileo encuentrala armona en las formas de las cur-vas y lo describi como un hombrelleno de irona que se inspira en lamujer, la biologa o la naturaleza.Arquitectura alegre que no es vaca,recalc, porque detrs hay un papelpoltico, el de hacer arquitectura paraque la gente la goce y para que la ciu-dad sea un lugar de felicidad.

    Podramos continuar citando aotros arquitectos, como Legorreta,Gae Aulenti, Francisco Lpez Guerra,Teodoro Gonzlez de Len, RichardMeier o Richard Rogers, pero termi-naremos citando aJuan Herreros, elcual resume los comentarios vertidosanteriormente acerca de los cambios

    presionistas, y a las que pertenecen lasarquitecturas de Saarinen, Scharoun,Tange, Candela, Nervi, Utzon o el pro-pio Le Corbusier, y que a pesar de serun paquete muy amplio, tienen comonexo el inters por el contexto, por lanaturaleza, por lo vernculo, la ex-presividad o la escultura y funda-mentalmente la monumentalidad.

    Termina Montaner sealando quese ha hablado de la gran influenciade LC, en la arquitectura, pero hu-biese sido posible Ronchamp sin laaportacin del carcter de las formascurvas en Oscar Niemeyer o el espa-cio ondulado de Alvar Aalto, arqui-tectos ms jvenes que LC?. Induda-blemente no.

    Es curioso cmo determinada crti-ca, se ha encargado de demonizar laarquitectura de Niemeyer, o la del LCde Ronchamp, a pesar de que cuan-

    do ha sido necesario ilustrar la arqui-tectura moderna del siglo XX, por par-te de profanos, que no incultos, se hayaescogido siempre a Ronchamp.

    Es llamativo tambin como popu-larmente en Brasil, Niemeyer es una es-pecie de padre de la patria, considera-do no ya el mejor arquitecto de Brasil,sino el mayor artista plstico del mun-do, por encima incluso de Picasso.

    La idea de la simplificacin forma-lista de la arquitectura Brasilea, se ex-tiende desde el plano de la ciudad de

    Costa, hasta los edificios proyectadospor Niemeyer, y que siempre respon-den a un esbozo formal muy simple.

    Recientemente, Zaha Zadid, conmotivo del centenario del maestro enun homenaje promovido por la agen-cia EFE, alababa la obra de Niemeyersin ambages:

    10/ Siza, Hadid, Rogers, Meier, Piano, Legorreta y Aulenti, home-najean al maestro Niemeyer.Terra.es. 14.12.07http://www.proyectoasistido.com/internacional/siza-hadid-ro-gers-meier-piano-legorreta-y-aulenti-homenajean-al-maestro-nie-meyer-2.html11/ arquia/documental 1/disco 1. Oscar NIEMEYER. Un arquitec-to comprometido. Blgica, 2000; Brasil, 2003.

    94

    Casa de Niemeyer , 1953.

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    8/11

    apreciados en la crtica de la obra deNiemeyer a travs del tiempo, y queadems conecta frontalmente con elhilo conductor del presente trabajo,la relacin entre el dibujo de Nieme-yer y su arquitectura:

    Oscar Niemeyer representa para los ar-quitectos la confianza en la forma. Aun-que su repertorio figurativo correspondaa una esttica y unas tcnicas no vigenteshoy, su trabajo trascender todas las po-cas pues nadie puede sustraerse a la fas-cinacin que produce una obra gestadadesde la seguridad de que imagen, siluetay experiencia espacial son elementos fun-damentales de la arquitectura.En cierto modo, Oscar Niemeyer emite unmensaje de sencillez a pesar de la volup-tuosidad de su trabajo pues la reduccina unos pocos materiales, unas organiza-ciones elementales y una facilidad casi in-genua en la comprensin y el uso de susedificios, le confiere un cariz mitolgicopor su relacin entre idea original, trazoprimero y construccin, como si no que-

    dara rastro del camino recorrido por elproyecto y tantos pasos intermedios nece-sarios para llevar cada obra a cabo.La puesta en valor de la belleza como in-grediente funcional es seguramente su le-gado ms frtil y til para la arquitectura.La obra de Oscar Niemeyer es ahora msapreciada que nunca y lo ser en el futu-ro prximo porque la crtica de formalis-ta ha perdido peso.Efectivamente, ya no cabe el menoscabode antifuncionalista o despilfarrador delespacio pues es la fusin de los dos con-ceptos belleza y funcin lo que hacegrande su trabajo no por atender a la ac-tividad programada con actitud minucio-sa sino por considerar que el uso expe-riencial del espacio y la percepcin sonfunciones tan importante o ms que cual-quier otra. Esta actitud convierte en su-perfluo el sinfn de exigencias y pormeno-res que tantas veces ahogan a los proyectoslastrando y perturbando hasta el deterio-ro irreversible lo que podra ser un tra-bajo limpio, intenso y hermoso. 12

    12/ arquia/documental 1/disco 1. Oscar N IEMEYER. Un arquitectocomprometido.

    Bibliografa especfica

    BIBLIOGRAFA ESPECFICA

    NIEMEYER , O100 Aos de Arquitectura. 2007.100 por 100 Niemeyer. Catlogo de la exposicin. Fun-dacin Telefnica. Madrid. 2009. http://www.skyscra-percity.com/archive/index.php/t-558920.htmlAs Curvas do Tempo. Editora Revan, Rio de Janeiro, 2000.Meu Ssia e eu. Campo das letras,Porto 1999. Niemeyer.1992.

    Minha Arquitetura- 1937-2004 - Editora Revan, Rio deJaneiro, 2004.

    BIBLIOGRAFA GENERAL

    TAFURI, m. Dal Co, F. Arquitectura Contempornea. Agui-lar. Madrid 1978

    MONTANER, Josep Mara. Despus del MM. Arquitectu-ra de la segunda mitad del siglo XX. GG. Barc. 1999

    LAMPUGNANI, V. M. Enciclopedia de la arquitectura delsiglo XX. G.G Barc. 1989

    BENVOLO, Leonardo. Historia de la arquitectura moder-na. GG. Barcelona 1987

    BOESIGER/ H. GIRSBERGER. Le Corbusier 1910-65. GG. Bar-celona 1978-98

    CURTIS, Wiliam. J.R. La arquitectura moderna desde 1900.Blume. Madrid 1986.

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    9/11

    The importance of DrawingDrawing, including figurative drawing, is essentialfor an architect, but in schools it was replaced bytechnical drawing and computers a long time ago. Atalented child does some fantastic drawings at eightor ten years old, which bad teaching and knowledgeof the classics is going to permanently vulgarize.Drawing is fantastic. It serves for almost everything.Seeing a childs drawing is always nice because thereis freedom. The child doesnt have anything in itshead, it is something spontaneous. So freedom anddrawing are essential parts of the life of man. 4

    When talking about desenho drawing, Niemeyerdefends the need for figurative drawing, of the hu-man figure, arguing that it provides the manual abil-ity to draw freehand:Ah, como mgico ver surgir na folha branca depapel um palcio, um museu, uma bela figura de mul-her! Como as desejo e gosto de desenh-las! Comoas sinto nas curvas da minha arquitectura! 5

    In addition, all through his books he presents us withfreehand drawings next to the photographs.We could say that freehand drawing is so importantto him that he re jects technical drawing, to such apoint that he considers it expendable. To try and findexhaustive documentation on his projects, plans thatdefine the construction, is an arduous task. It is al-most as if there was no intermediate step betweenthe figurative drawing and the constructed work.Niemeyer says that he has often come up with the

    solution for a project by just thinking about it, with-out drawing (as Sota says he did), imagining how itis, how it should be, but at other times he arrives atthe solution through drawing: The basis for archi-tecture is drawing and the mind. When a solution isfound, and once the drawings are defined, I start towrite a text explaining the architecture, and if on read-ing the text I do not find arguments I go back to thedrawing board because something is missing. 6

    The influence of the landscape and the feminine formon his workIn Minha Arquitectura, Niemeyer writes: No ongulo recto que me atrai, nem a linha recta, dura einflexvel, criada pelo homem. O que me atrai a cur-va livre e sensual, a curva que encontro nas montan-has do meu pas, no curso sinuoso dos seus rios, nas

    ondas do mar, no corpo da mulher preferida. De cur-vas feito todo o universo, o universo curvo de Ein-stein.Many of Niemeyers drawings are of women, or, per-haps more accurately, of womens curves; and manyof the drawings of buildings are equally curvaceousand immediately bring to mind the feminine form.On one occasion, Le Corbusier told Niemeyer that hehad the Rio mountains within him.Niemeyer replied that this was partly true, that theenvironment in which he was living was to blame, but

    Siza, in which the beautiful photograph at the backwas omnipresent, but more of that later.To see Niemeyer drawing architecture in personand at 92 years old is without doubt a privilege, aunique opportunity that chance, or luck, allowedme to enjoy. I am saying drawing architecture nottalking about architecture because Niemeyerdoes not know how to communicate, to express thedepth of his architectural thinking, without the aidof drawing, without using his hand to put black penon white paper.Black on white.

    The purest contrast, the truth without beating aboutthe bush, without shades of grey, without resortingto artifice.White and black.The pure form expressed in lines that reflect the mainidea, the idea that defines his architecture so well,that the line is the shape: it is architecture.

    The relationship between DRAWING andARCHITECTUREA Arquitectura se exibe desde o primeiro trao.Architecture which seeks out beauty through theimagination, without worrying about small details,working on the structure, which is created and ex-hibited with the first line1

    When Niemeyer says that his architecture is insert-ed and exhibited in the structure, nas quais se in-sere e se exibe desde o primeiro trao, he is talkingnot only about the first stages of construction, but al-so the first linesof the drawing. From the first mo-ment of conception, his direct and minimalist draw-ing defines the structure which will be, in the end,the essence of the archi tectu re i tself . Se exam-inarem o Congreso de Brasilia ou os palcios nelarealizados vero que, terminadas sus estruturas, aarquitetura ja estava presente. 2

    For Niemeyer, the beauty of his architecture, in con-trast to functionalist architecture, resides in the free-dom of the forms, in the lightness, variety and cre-ativity that he gives them through the use of concrete,and which is perfectly expressed by his drawings. Hequotes Baudelaire when he says: Linattendu, lir-rgularit , la surprise et letonnement sont una par-tie essentielle et une caractristique de la beaut.3

    If, for example, we examine the drawing of the Mon-dadori headquarters at the same time as we look atthe building, or at its canonic photograph, we can seean almost complete definition of the building; thedrawing represents, through fine lines and withoutshading, the purity of the form of the building, a draw-ing in which details scarcely exist and, where theydo exist, are unimportant. The lines of the drawingcreate the outline of the future structural form.Architecture which is also simple, without details,structural, monumental.

    ABOUT THE DRAWINGS OF OSCAR

    NIEMEYER

    by Manuel Franco Taboada

    This paper is a continuation and development of thework presented to the International ArchitecturalGraphic Expression Congress in Madrid in 2008, underthe title: Simple drawing versus simple architecture.In that paper we intended to answer the conundrumin the title. In other words, is there a direct link be-tween an architects drawings and his or her architec-ture? Or, on the contrary, is it possible to have simplearchitecture with project drawings that are baroqueand highly detailed, and therefore contradictory?The text went on to say:In the same way, one can ask if from architecturewith a taste for elaborate details or decoration onecan infer that the drawing is also complex, arabesque,over-drawn.The initial aim of that paper was therefore very am-bitious: the intention was to explore the concept asa whole. It soon became clear that the field is im-mense, that there is more than enough material for adoctoral thesis. We therefore delimited the objectiveof the study/field to a few masters of architecture,chosen subjectively, leaving for later the architectsinitially included in the summary of the paper.It was therefore an introduction, the exploration ofan idea, a taste of the work to come.Work therefore began to test the relationship betweendrawing and architecture for the following architects:Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer,Alejandro de la Sota and Frank Lloyd Wright.In this paper we are going to explore the work of theBrazilian master Oscar Niemeyer in more depth,through his drawing. We are starting f rom the viewthat, as we will explore below, few architects havebeen as militant in terms of valuing the importanceof drawing in architecture, something that we cansee not only from the huge number of graphic testi-monies, but also from his reflections about drawingas a creative medium.I consider it a privilege to have been witness to a plas-tic-communicative expression, unprecedented in thehistory of architecture, during the extraordinary op-portunity I had to meet Oscar Niemeyer, experiencingin person a detailed explanation of his architecturalconcept, his works, and his legacy, through drawing.We arrived at the studio in his house in Copacabana,Rio de Janeiro, early in the morning. Today he is 101years old, but at that time he was 92 years old and itwas surprising to see how enormously energetic hewas, something that he communicated clearly. Smok-ing a cigarette and with his hands on his braces, heshowed us into his office, the same one that you cansee in the photograph taken last year with Alvaro

    1/ OSCAR NIEMEYER, Meu Sosia e eu. 1992, Page. 33.2/ Idem, p.35.3/ Idem, p.33.

    4/ OSCAR NIEMEYER, 100 years of Architecture(Oh, howmagical it is to see what appears on a sheet of white paper,a palace, a museum, the beautiful figure of a woman! Likedesire and the enjoyment of drawing, like the feeling fromthe curves of my architecture! ).5/ arquia/documental 1/disc 1. Oscar Niemeyer. Unarquitecto comprometido. Belgium, 2000; Brazil, 2003.6/ Idem previous.

    00

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    10/11

    7/ NIEMEYER , O. As Curvas do Tempo- Publisher Revan, Riode Janeiro, 20008/ TAFURI, M. DAL CO, F. Arquitectura Contempornea.Aguilar. Madrid 1978.

    9/ MONTANER, JOSEP MARA. Despus del MM. Arquitecturade la segunda mitad del siglo XX. GG. Barc. 1999.10/ Siza, Hadid, Rogers, Meier, Piano, Legorreta y Aulenti,homenajean al maestro Niemeyer.Terra.es. 14.12.07.http://www.proyectoasistido.com/internacional/siza-hadid-rogers-meier-piano-legorreta-y-aulenti-homenajean-al-maes-tro-niemeyer-2.html.

    Niemeyer, and that of LCs Ronchamp, despite thefact that when it is necessary to illustrate the mod-ern architecture of the 20th century, for laymen, butcultured ones, he always chooses Ronchamp.It is also interesting to note that in Brazil, Niemeyeris seen as a type of father figure in the country, con-sidered as not just the best architect in Brazil, but al-so the best plastic artist in the world, better even thanPicasso.The idea of the formalist simplification of Brazilianarchitecture extends from Costas plan for the city tothe buildings constructed by Niemeyer, and always

    involves a very simple outline of the shape.Recently, Zaha Zadid, in a tribute to the master, pro-moted by the EFE agency, to celebrate him reach-ing 100 years old, praised the work of Niemeyer with-out beating about the bush:Oscar Niemeyer has had a profound and lasting in-fluence on my work. I have visited many of his worksin Brazil and I have also had the privilege to have methim on several occasions.I believe that his originality, his spatial sensitivity andhis virtuoso talent are absolutely unique and unsur-passed. His work inspired me and encouraged me tofollow my own path in architecture and to follow himin the search for total fluidity on all scales. 9

    For Alvaro Siza, Niemeyer supported the recoveryof creative freedom, the combination of tradition andmodernity and he recalls the fascination that this

    produced in his generation of Brazilian designers:Pillars as points, walls as fine undulating lines, theform almost broken up, with everything so clear, sonew and so evocative10.Renzo Piano recalled that Niemeyer was on the ju-ry for a competition which assigned the constructionof the Pompidou centre in Paris to him and to the Eng-lish architect Richard Rogers.He added that the Brazilian found harmony in the formof the curves and described him as a man full of ironywho was inspired by women, biology and nature.Cheerful architecture which is not empty he saysbecause behind it is a political role, that of makingarchitecture for people to enjoy, so that the city canbe a place for happiness.We could continue quoting other architects such asLegorreta, Gae Aulenti, Francisco Lpez Guerra,

    Teodoro Gonzlez de Len, Richard Meier andRichard Rogers, but instead we will finish by quotingJuan Herreros, who summarises the comments setout above about the notable changes in the criticalview of the work of Niemeyer over time, and also con-nects directly with the thread running through thispaper, the relationship between Niemeyers draw-ings and his architecture:For architects, Oscar Niemeyer represents confi-dence in the form. Although his figurative repertoireinvolves an aesthetic and techniques which are no

    Niemeyers House in Rio, from 1953, is a giant dec-orative moulding.Josep M Botey, in the book about Niemeyer by GG,tells the anecdote that Mies, visiting the house, com-mented that it is a small construction, very pretty,but not repeatable, an exclamation which greatlyamused Niemeyer who declared: But how can ahouse be repeatable when it has a particular sur-rounding, contours lines to sit on, a light, a land-scape.? How can it be repeated?. In this sense,Niemeyer was far ahead of his time, anticipating anarchitecture that would respect the location, an ar-

    chitecture for which the location, the genius loci,would be fundamental.For Manfredo Tafuri, the architecture of Niemeyerand Costa can be included in expressionism, clas-sifying it as scenographic, and stating that in Brazilit demonstrates the limits of is poetics, terminating initself and repeating itself ad nauseum. The destruc-tive words of the critic continue, classifying the planfor Brasilia as infantile, and the architecture ofNiemeyer where the gratuitous is tinted with whatis certainly a spectacular sophistication, but of su-perfluous whimsicality.7

    For J. M. Montaner, Latin American architecture foundmodernity on its own, and despite LCs influence be-ing very notable in the works of the first vanguards,the formal paradigms of LC are being taken with com-plete freedom, and even completely perverted.8

    In this small historiographic section on the reactionto Brazilian works, from Benvolo in 1974-87, pass-ing through Tafuri in 1976 and up to Montaner in 1999,we see how opinions about the phenomenon havechanged and improved over time, up to the currentday Montaner, less rigid and more liberalising.Montaner, in the book quoted above, states thatNiemeyer, immediately after the vanguards, is one ofthe first architects to, from this renovat ing and pro-gressive attitude, completely put the principles ofstrict functionalism in architecture in doubt. His workis above all sculptural and expressive.He was really ahead of his time, ahead of the move-ments which the critics would later label as brutalistand expressionist, to which the architecture of Saari-nen, Scharoun, Tange, Candela, Nervi, Utzon and LeCorbusier himself belongs, and despite being a verywide group it has as its nexus an interest in context,nature, the vernacular, expressivity or sculpture,and fundamentally, monumentality.Montaner finished by saying that much has beensaid about the great influence of LC on the architec-ture. However, would Ronchamp have been possiblewithout the benefit of the curved forms of OscarNiemeyer or the undulating space of Alvar Aalto, ar-chitects younger than LC. Undoubtedly not.It is curious how, as a determined critic, he has tak-en it upon himself to demonise the architecture of

    not only the mountains of Rio, also suas praias bran-cas, suas montanhas monumentais, suas velhas igre-jas barrocas, suas belas mulheres bronceadas Tu-do que me emocionava.. In fact, the photograph inhis office plays with identification, with the confusionbetween shapes that could be montanhas or mul-heres bronceadas.This confusion, without doubt intentional, can alsobe seen in this drawing, which shows the relation-ship between the shape of the landscape and thefeminine form.Women also attract us. So my architecture is notwhat Le Corbusier was saying, but rather what Mal-raux was saying, that he had a private museumwhere he kept everything that he had seen andloved in his life.Without wanting to, I think that what I have insideme (my double) is more wicked than I am, he thinksonly wicked thoughts, and therefore has the mostabsurd ideas. At times he wants to do things thatare just not possible. He has to be contained. Hedraws me towards architecture, he likes curves, helikes women, he likes the most fascinating things,doesnt he? I think it is so, and I think it is the ba-sis for life. I am just like anyone else. I just thinkabout that. Without women, men have no reason tolive. It is inevitable. The woman is mans compan-ion, she is essential. She is the queen of the men.Fantastic, isnt it?Despite the huge importance to Niemeyer of femi-

    nine beauty, and architecture, although this may havetaken second place, we must add, without knowingif it comes before or after these other priorities, hisconcern for the less fortunate, those forgotten by theaffluent, expressed in his own words.On one occasion he told the students at a school ofarchitecture that he would include three objectivesin their education: prepare them for writing so theycan explain their projects; provide them with the ca-pacity to draw so they can prepare projects, and cre-ate concern about how to achieve greater socialequality. It is a real existential concern for Niemey-er; the day that I visited him in his studio he said: Ar-chitecture is important, but life and social justice forthe people are more important.

    Brief review of the works of Niemeyer

    In the 40s, 50s and 60s, the Brazilian architect wasaccused by critics such a M. Bill of formalism, mov-ing away from the archetypal concepts of rational ar-chitecture, taking the formal elements that interest-ed him but using them as conventional forms, asaesthetic recipes, simplifying the rationalist reper-toire and weakening the result.The argument centres on whether the Brazilianexperience is truly modern or, on the contrary, ithas turned into a sui generisinterpretation, mixedwith the vernacular or indigenous. For Benvolo,

  • 7/25/2019 1015-2197-1-SM.pdf

    11/11

    CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE AND

    COLOR OF THE LANDSCAPE: BETWEEN

    MIMICRY AND UNIQUENESS

    by Juan Serra

    IntroductionThis article reflects on the link between color dis-plays on contemporary architecture and its naturalor built context. Every architectural object establish-es a formal dialogue with the landscape in which itfits, which should take into account the characteris-

    tics of architecture and its counterpar t in the physi-cal environment: geometry, dimensions, materials,colors, etc. Architects usually describe the nature ofthese characteristics that often serve as a startingpoint and an inspiration source to unleash the cre-ative process of a building project. However, it is of-ten observed that the chromatic relat ionship of thenew building on its immediate context is studied withless intensity or even with an excess of disinterest.The reasons for this circumstance first responds tothe complex nature of the phenomenon being stud-ied. The color has too many variables that determineand affect its perception: colorimetric variables, pig-ments, light source (Lois Swirnoff), the extension ofthe surface (Karen Fridell), the distance of observa-tion (Andrers Hard), th e cesium (JL Caivano, A C .Hardy), the chromatic contrasts (J. Albers, etc.). Sec-

    ondly, there are methodological and procedural lim-itations: technical limitations of the equipment used(Zenna OConnor), criteria for selecting the colorranges that dominate the landscape (JP Lenclos), in-formation management, color terminology (GiovanniBrino, etc.). It is evident, therefore, a certain delay inthe assessment of the chromatic circumstances forthe project if compared to other architectural var i-ables traditionally well-attended, as the lines of theterritory or its formal logic, which is also due to a mod-ern tradition of low interest in architectural color.The conception of architecture as a constructed ob-ject located in an environment is governed by the Lawof Back-figure. This principle is basic to the percep-tion of space and was studied in depth both by RudolfArnheim and by the Danish psychologist Egar Rubin(1886-1951). As our perception is binary, we tend to

    perceive the geometry of objects like figures cut onsurrounding and unlimited surfaces perceived asbackground. In the perception of reality we do notonly recognize two levels of deepness but a succes-sion of levels which form a complex and organizeddistribution scheme. In 1915, Rubin identifies manyfactors that facilitate that a form is perceived as fig-ure instead of a background: its smaller size over theground, its closed contour, its most texture, its low-er position in the composition, the simplicity of its

    FIGURES1. Photograph of the author.2. Photograph from the book: 100 x 100 Niemeyer.3 and 4. Three Powers Square, Brasilia, 1955-60.5 and 6. Mondadori Headquarters, 1974.7. Drawing by Niemeyer.8 and 9. A drawing by Niemeyer (9). Photograph of BrasiliaCathedral.10. Drawing from an Exhibition Catalogue: Niemeyer, Tele-fnica Foundation. 2007.11. Drawing by Oscar Niemeyer for the author, completed inhis study in Rio.12. Detail from the previous drawing.13. Ministry of Defence (Brazilian Army), Brasilia.

    14. Popular Theatre in Niteroi.15. Detail, adjustments to the Niemeyer drawing.16. Photograph which presides over his office in Copaca-bana.17. Drawing by Niemeyer.18. Drawing by Niemeyer (Meu sosia e eu).

    Niemeyers House 1953

    longer in use, his work will transcend the generationsbecause nobody can take away the fascination pro-duced by a work created from the security that im-age, silhouette and spatial experience are fundamen-tal elements in architecture.In a certain way, Oscar Niemeyer emits a messageof simplicity despite the voluptuousness of his work.The reduction to a few materials, some elemental or-ganisations and an almost ingenious facility for the com-prehension and use of his buildings, confer him a mytho-logical image due to the relationship between theoriginal idea, the first line and the construction, as if no

    trace remains of the development of the project andthe many intermediary steps required to complete it.The emphasis on beauty as a functional ingredientmust be his most fertile and useful legacy for archi-tecture. The work of Oscar Niemeyer is more appre-ciated now than ever, and this will continue in thenear future because the criticism of formalism hasweakened.Indeed, there is no longer room to criticise his worksas anti-functionalist or extravagant with space, sinceit is the fusion of the two concepts of beauty andfunction which makes his work so good. Instead ofpaying meticulous attention to the programmed ac-tivity, he considers the experiential use of the spaceand perception as functions which are as important,or even more important, than any other. This attituderenders superfluous the various demands and detailswhich so often can drown a project, weighing it downand modifying it until there is an irreversible deteri-oration in what could have been a clean, intense andbeautiful work.11

    BIBLIOGRAPHYSpecific Bibliography:Niemeyer, O:100 Aos de Arquitectura. 2007100 x 100 Niemeyer. Exhibition catalogue. Telefnica Foun-dation. Madrid. 2009.http://www.skyscrapercity.com/archive/index.php/t-558920.htmlAs Curvas do Tempo- Publisher Revan, Rio de Janeiro, 2000Meu Ssia e eu. - Campo das letras Porto 1 999. Niemeyer.1992.Minha Arquitetura - 1937-2004 - Publisher Revan, Rio deJaneiro, 2004.

    General bibliography:

    Tafuri, m. Dal Co, F. Arquitectura Contempornea. Aguilar.Madrid 1978.Montaner, Josep Mara. Despus del MM. Arquitectura dela segunda mitad del siglo XX. GG. Barc. 1999.Lampugnani, V. M. Enciclopedia de la arquitectura del sigloXX. G.G Barc. 1989Benvolo, Leonardo. Historia de la arquitectura moderna.GG. Barcelona 1987.Boesiger / H. Girsberger. Le Corbusier 1910-65. GG.Barcelona 1978-98.Curtis, Wiliam. J.R. La arquitectura moderna desde 1900.Blume. Madrid 1986.

    11/ arquia/documental 1/disco 1. Oscar Niemeyer. Unarquitecto comprometido. Belgium, 2000; Brazil 2003.12/ arquia/documental 1/disco 1. Oscar Niemeyer. Unarquitecto comprometido. Belgium, 2000; Brazil 2003.

    02