Upload
duongxuyen
View
236
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ISSN 1342-0852
Proceedings of the Specialists' Meeting on
Effects of the Fukushima-1 Accident on Organisms around the Nuclear Power Plant Site
(August 3 - 4, 2016)
Edited by : Saito T. Fukumoto M. Imanaka T.
Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University
KURRI-EKR-15
i
2011 3
2 2014 40 12 2015 70 24 2016 8 3 4 2 74 23 2016 23 3
2016
5 2016
ii
Preface
The Fukushima-1 accident in March of 2011 released a large quantity of radioactive substances
and caused significant radioactive environmental contamination. The current research on the effects
of the radioactive contamination on humans has numerous problems, although it has been conducted
on a relatively large scale because of the great deal of interest in the topic. On the other hand,
systematic research on the effects of the radiation around the nuclear power plant site on organisms
exposed to a wide range of radiation from low to high doses compared to humans has apparently
lagged behind. Understanding the radiation effects on organisms around the nuclear power plant site
would provide important information for us to consider regarding the effects of the accident on
humans and their environments.
After the Fukushima-1 accident, many scientists voluntarily began studies and surveys to clarify
the effects of the accident and of the radioactive contamination on many types of organisms. Two
workshops were held as opportunities for the scientists conducting these studies and surveys to
discuss the issues. In these workshops, meaningful discussions ensued, about 40 participants attended
the 12 presentations in 2014, and more than 70 participants attended the 24 presentations in 2015.
Based on the outcomes of first two workshops, the third workshop, entitled Effects of the
Fukushima-1 Accident on Organisms around the Nuclear Power Plant Site, was held on August 3
and 4, 2016, at the Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University. There were 23 presentations and 74
participants at the third workshop. This paper reports the proceedings of the third workshop.
The three workshops were successful because a great deal of information was exchanged among
the various scientists and their understanding of other fields of research increased. Because of the
active discussions at the 2016 workshop, a consensus was developed on the future direction for this
research. It is truly meaningful that the 2016 workshop was a success because five years had passed
since the accident, making 2016 a milestone year as the early stage of research on the effects of the
accident.
Despite this progress, the effects of the accident on organisms around the nuclear power plant site
and the ecosystem are complex. Therefore, it is important to continue collecting, integrating, and
preserving phenomena, and it is vital to continue long-term research projects using these data; sharing
obtained results is extremely important. We hope that the 2016 workshop will contribute to the
development of future research.
December 2016
SAITO Takeshi
iii
1. 1
2.
13
3. 21
4.
33
5. 37
6. EGS5
47
7. EPMA 54
8.
65
9. 70
10. 20132015
77
11. Transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiling of low-level gamma irradiated rice at Iitate village, Fukushima
Randeep Rakwal 94
12. 119
iv
13.
130
14. 132
15.
134
16. 141
17.
157
18. 90Sr238Pu,239240Pu 1
172
19. 190
20.
195
21. 204
22. Cs
220
23. 233
1,2, 1 1,3 1
1 2 3
DNA
DNA
1
1
1,2, 1 1,3 14 5 G
1 2 3 4 5
2016.07.06 325 (20 + 5
3.6mSv/
2
203
4ICRP pub 41 (1984)
3
10-4 10-3 10-2 0.1 1 10 100 103 104 105
mSv/
Gy/
6 mGy/ *
1mSv/
1.8-3.7mSv/
20mSv/
10 200 4000400
4
0.05 mGy/ 20 mGy)1 mGy/ 400 mGy)20 mGy/ 8000 mGy) (Tanaka, S. et al., Radiat. Res. 160:376-9, 2003)
1
2
3,4
3,5
3,6
7
8,9
10
(-)3
1. Radiat Res 160: 376 (2003) 2. Radiat Res 167: 417 (2007) 3. Unpublished results4. Int J Radiat Biol 87:729 (2011)5. Radiat Res 173: 333 (2010)
6. Radiat Res 171: 290 (2009)7. Radiat Res 173: 138 (2010)8. Radiat Res 174: 611 (2010)9. J Radiat Res 50: 241 (2009)10. J Radiat Res 49: 661 (2008)
5
(238U, 232Th)
(222Rn)
(232Th)
(226, 228Ra)
(137Cs)131I
(Memorial University HP)
The Radium Girls
(Asahi-com.or.jp)
(224Ra)
239Pu)
(Harrison JD & Muirhead CR, Int J Radiat Biol 79:1, 2003; Brenner AV et al, Environ Health Perspect, 119:933, 2011.)
(134, 137Cs)
6
43.5 32.335.6 26.015.4 35.431.3 6.3
9.60.2
81.58.6
(%)
(Andersson M et al. Rad Res 1994)(Mori T et al. Ibid 1999)
11
12Preston, Radiat Res 2007Fukumoto M. Pathol Int 64:doi:10.1111/pin.121, 2014
20
7
8
1st hit
Mf
Yamamoto Y et al. Health Phys 99:388, 2010.80
16
9
134Cs 137Cs (mGy)
1 1960.7-1.2 0.4-0.6
3.9-4.42 0.8
2 3153.2-6.1 1.8-3.4
6.9-11.41.3 0.6
Yamashiro H et al. Sci Rep 8(3): 2850, 201317
0.1 Gy
18
MDA
SOD
H2O2
H2O
GPx
MDA Puthran et al, 20093.5mSv MDA Serhatlioglu et al, 2003
Klucinski et al, 2008
Urushihara et al PlosOne 2016
10
10
DNA / RNA 2D barcode tubes
(-80oC)
Electron Probe Microanalyzer
Lazar microdissection
/ (-
2016.02.24
11
2D barcode tubes
(-80oC)
Electron Probe Microanalyzer
Lazar microdissection
/ (-
2016.02.24
12
13
14
10 100 1000 10000
(Gy)
15
16
Lethal Zone
(4 km2)
Medium damage Zone
(120 km2)
Sublethal Zone
(38 km2)
Minor damage Zone
>80-100 Gy10-20 Gy4-5 Gy0.5-1.2 Gy
(
(
17
18
**
**
**
19
20
2011 3 11 1F
1F137Cs
2011 12 14 1F 20km16
1) ( ) 2011 122011 12 14 1F 20km 16
2) 2012 4 82012 4 7 8 43 1F20km 10 33
1
3) 2013 5 62013 5 61F 20km 7 2012
1F
50cm 101m2
1) ( ) 2011 122011 12 14 16
1 1
2) 2012 4 82012 4 8 43
1F P
30km1F
30km
3) 2013 5 62013 5 6
7 50cm1F
P
23
35.0 Sv/h 20.0 Sv/h
1.54 Sv/h
24
25
Cellana grata
T. clavigera
26
27
28
29
30
/
2012 4
2014 4
2015 4
31
P
P
32
2011 3 1F
30m2012 10 2013 1 2 3
2012 10 1F 30km 66
1F 10m, 20m, 30m2012 10 2013 1 7 9/10 2014 1 7 2015 1 7 30m
10m 20m
134Cs 137Cs15 20
2013 2015
2012 10 66 1F1,650 Bq/kg
TOC T-N2014 1 30m 10 30 Bq/kg
30 50 Bq/kg 500 100 Bq/kg 10 40 mBq/L 2013 7 230
57.6 100 Bq/kg wet137Cs 102
100A 10~20m
B 10m C 10m~20m D 20m 30m 4 A1F B
CD
B C D 20132014
33
34
35
36
2011
wIV 2011 2 6 27.3
2012 wV VI 2011 1 10
Dic ring
Dic ring Dic ring
ctg ctb csb
PLD
10cm
10cm
PLD
PLD 5%
37
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
38
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
November 2, 2014
39
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
40
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
Hirosaki
NamieFields
Distancefrom
F1-NPP(km)
Dose rate in the air ( Gy/h)
2011 2012 2013
Autumn Spring Autumn Spring
Namie
Tsushima 28.5 20.2 - - -
Akogi 22.8 29.1 28.9 26.9 15.2
Murohara 15.3 - 15.6 14.2 9.7Tatsuno 12.6 8.79 - - -
Tanashio 8.8 0.59 0.55 0.52 0.66
Ide 8.4 - 25.3 24.5 16.4
Ukedo 6.8 - 0.45 - -
Hirosaki
Owasawa 352.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 -
Sakamoto 349.2 0.06 0.06 0.06 -
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
41
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
FragmentDIC
Ring
Chromatid gap Chromatid break Chromosome break
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
42
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
43
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
44
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
45
Hirosaki University, Chromosome Research Group Tomisato Miura, Ph.D.
46
EGS5
ICRP 12
ICRPDerived Consideration
Reference Levels 0.1 mGy/dGarnier-Laplace
J, et. al. (2011) 30 3.9 mGy/dICRP
20112012 2014
Apodemus speciosus
EGS5ICRP
47
1
EGS5
2
3.9 mGy/day (1.4 Gy/year)
1.0 10 mGy/day :
30 Garnier-Laplace J, et. al. (2011)
48
3
International Commission of Radiological Protection and Environmental Protection. The Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants; Annals of ICRP; Publication 108;
0.1 1.0 mGy/day:
1.0 10 mGy/day :
0.01 0.1 mGy/day :
10 100 mGy/day :
100 1000 mGy/day :
>1000 mGy/day : 6-10 Gy LD50/30 1Gy LD50
5
( Sv/hr)
6
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
2012 2013 2014 2015
Sv/hr
year
50
Cs134 Cs137
7
0.0
100000.0
200000.0
300000.0
400000.0
500000.0
600000.0
700000.0
2012 2013 2014 2015
Bq/kg
(Bq/kg)
8
(Cs134 Cs137)
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
51
Cs137 Cs134
Cs137 CsCs1
Cs137 * EGS5** ***
* **Hirayama, Namito, Bielajew, Wilderman and Nelson (2005),SLAC-R-730/UC-407and KEK Report 2004-5 ***Cs137
9
HANDY SURVEYMETER Type NHE20CY3-131BY-S (Fuji Electric)
2012 n=27 15 12 2013 n=19 13 62014 n=16 10 6 2015n=11 8 3
(
30g * 20mm 122mm 23g 17mm 104mm
merge
(* (1980))
52
11
n=19 n=20 n=27 n=15 n=5 n=5
. .
100
53
54
EPMA
55
Kubota et al., J Environ Radioact 2015;142:12431.
24
http://www.env.go.jp/jishin/monitoring/results_wl_d130314.pdf
122 mGy/Year Okano et al., Scientific Reports, 6:23601, 2016
56
(EPMA)Cs
2012 11 2013 4 2016 4
57
Seq150 2012/5/29 2012/5/29 36.962721 2015/11/20 2015/11/20 34.15 2072811 2016/4/18 2016/4/18 42.75 223
Seq215 2012/11/6 2012/11/6 23.53 189 26.9 Gy/h
260 2013/4/19 2013/4/19 32.42 195 Gy/h572 2016/4/12 2016/4/12 36.21 202 12.3 Gy/h575 2016/4/13 2016/4/13 29.17 204 12.3 Gy/h
2016/4/14 2016/4/14 10.81 145 12.3 Gy/h594 2016/4/15 2016/4/15 28.08 215 12.3 Gy/h595 2016/4/16 2016/4/16 44.45 248 12.3 Gy/h257 2013/4/19 2013/4/19 30.2 295 16.4 Gy/h596 2016/4/14 2016/4/14 50.09 245 5.3 Gy/h597 2016/4/14 2016/4/14 43.52 223 5.3 Gy/h
3 mH E
EPMA
58
X
EPMA
Shimazdu EPMA 1720
Electron Probe Microanalysis :
www.ube ind.co.jp
59
1 8 2 1
Seq150 2012/5/29 2012/5/29 36.96
Seq215 2012/11/6 2012/11/6 23.53 189 26.9 Gy/h
260 2013/4/19 2013/4/19 32.42 195 Gy/h257 2013/4/19 2013/4/19 30.2 295 16.4 Gy/h
EPMA
150 ( )
Cs
NS NS
Cs
60
EPMA
Cs
S NNS
Cs
5
Seq2811 2016/4/18 2016/4/18 42.75 2232721 2015/11/20 2015/11/20 34.15 207
Seq572 2016/4/12 2016/4/12 36.21 202 12.3 Gy/h575 2016/4/12 2016/4/12 29.17 204 12.3 Gy/h
2016/4/13 2016/4/13 10.81 145 12.3 Gy/h594 2016/4/14 2016/4/14 28.08 215 12.3 Gy/h595 2016/4/14 2016/4/14 44.45 248 12.3 Gy/h596 2016/4/14 2016/4/14 50.09 245 5.3 Gy/h597 2016/4/14 2016/4/14 43.52 223 5.3 Gy/h
61
2 EPMA
S N
Cs
NS
Cs
EPMA
S N
Cs
NS
Cs
62
EPMA
Cs
S N
Cs
NS
EPMA
S N
Cs
NS
Cs
NS
Cs
63
HE
EPMA S N
EPMACs
1 2 5
Cs
64
2011
27km
3.6 Sv/hr 2011 10 70km
0.2 Sv/hr 12
29km
4.5 Sv/hr 2014 9 2015
9 11 80-120 3 4
2014
0-5cm
65
1 2 1 1 1
2016 8 3 4590 0494
66
3.6 uSv/hr2011
0.2uSv/hr2011
7 10 uSv/hr2012
67
Cs134+137
Cs137
Cs134
SE
Bq/kg
134137
2015
Bq/kg
Cs134+137
Cs137
Cs134
Cs134+137
Cs137
Cs134
SE
134137
2015
68
69
20132016 7 10
349
1/5
2013 20145 4
2013 9 18
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
2013 2014 8 9
1372013
MMC2014
2015 105
2014 20132015
MMC
3
1
77
2013-2015
1.5 2016.6.18.
78
2013 2014
134Cs + 137C Bq/m 2
TG13, 14KW14
NG14
MD13, 14
WD13
KM13MS14
2011 11 5
MD13, 14 KM13 WD13:NG14 MS14 KW14TG13,14:
79
4 5
May-Grunwald Giemsa
5 mH.E
NPO
80
uSvBq/kg 137Cs
Bq/kg134 137
2013
MD13 2.5 5 8200
KM13 2.5 4 53000
WD13 3.6 5 21000
TG13 0.04 4 55
2014
MD14 1.5 5 12000
NG14 3.3 5 57000/66000
MS14 0.9 4 38000
KW14 0.2 5 4100
TG14 0.03 5 - 11
Cs Cs Cs total
402 921 1323 731
1540 3493 5033 1157
1818 4168 5986 2619
3 10 13 5.5
100 328 438 214
306 1004 1310 532
243 815 1058 29421 69 90 42
6 6 1
81
T
MMCMMC
82
MMC
2013
83
2014
2014
3
BT T
TT
84
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
/mm3 /mm3
/mm3 /mm3
(Neutrophil)
(Basophil)
(Monocyte)
(Lymphocyte)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
1 10 100 1000 10000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
1 10 100 1000 10000137Cs Bq/kg
/mm
3
NG14WD13:MS14KM13MD13, 14KW14TG13,14:
2013
2014
2014
85
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
1 10 100 1000 10000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
1 10 100 1000 10000137Cs Bq/kg
/mm
3
NG14WD13:MS14KM13MD13, 14KW14TG13,14:
2013
2014
2014
0
500
1000
1500
2000
1 10 100 1000 10000
137Cs Bq/kg
/mm
3
NG14WD13:MS14KM13MD13, 14KW14TG13,14:
2013
0
500
1000
1500
2000
1 10 100 1000 10000
2014
2014
86
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
1 10 100 1000 10000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
1 10 100 1000 10000137Cs Bq/kg
/mm
3
NG14WD13:MS14KM13MD13, 14KW14TG13,14:
2013
2014
2014
2013
20132014
87
2015
88
89
137Cs 2015.10.7.
0
1000
2000
3000
0 10 20 30 40 50 600 10 20 30 40 50 60cm
3000
2000
1000
0
137Cs
Bq/k
g)
22013
Cs
90
91
1
92
1
2016 9 2
IISORA IISORA
NPONPO
93
Transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiling of low-level gamma irradiated rice at Iitate village, Fukushima Randeep Rakwal Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, and Tsukuba International Academy for Sport Studies (TIAS), University of Tsukuba
E-mail: [email protected]
We have been investigating the effects of low dose of gamma radiation in rice, following the 2011-3.11 Great Tohoku Earthquake and the subsequent nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. To do so, the contaminated Iitate Farm field (hereafter ITF) located in Iitate village, 31 km from the damaged nuclear power plant having an ambient radiation level of ~ 5 Sv/h, around 100 times higher than natural background radiation for Japan (~ 0.05 Sv/h), was used for investigating low-level gamma radiation experiments using Japonica-type rice (Oryza sativa L.) as a model system. Two experimental designs were used, first, a two-week-old seedling model for leaf, and second, growing rice in the contaminated soil till harvest for seeds. In experiment 1, the leaves were sampled at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h post-gamma irradiation at ITF, and rice whole genome 4x44K DNA microarray chip revealed differentially regulated 4481 (induced) and 3740 (suppressed) and 2291 (induced) and 1474 (suppressed) genes at 6 and 72 h, respectively. Gene expression profiles in DNA replication/repair, oxidative stress, photosynthesis, and defense/stress functions were validated by RT-PCR. Simultaneously, 2D-DIGE-based analysis at 72 h revealed 91 differentially expressed spots, whose MALDI-TOF and TOF/TOF mass spectrometry analyses identified 59 different (50 up-accumulated, 9 down-accumulated) proteins. These results unraveled the molecular responses at the level of the genome and proteome in vegetative leaf tissues. In experiment 2, we grew rice in the contaminated site (rice field) in ITF, till maturity and harvested the seeds. These seeds were compared with the seeds harvested from the rice grown in the clean soil in Minamisoma (Fukushima) at the level of the genome and metabolome under continuous gamma radiation exposure outside and inside the rice plant. An Agilent-based multi-omics workflow and analyses was used for the seed study to reveal the modulation of several metabolic and defense pathways related to the stress response of plants. It can be said that the rice plants grown in radionuclide-contaminated soil form seeds with an elevated defense capability against stress. Currently, we are investigating the rice seed proteome-wide changes using 1-DE shotgun approach in combination with mass spectrometry.
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
o
o
106
107
108
109
o
o
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
Mousseau et al. 2014, Oecologia 175: 429-437)
120
(
Mousseau et al. 2014)
Mousseau et al. 2014)
121
122
123
124
Control
Control
125
Control Radiation Control Radiation
Mixed model, glmer in Rradiation /control P=0.690
Mixed model, glmer in Rradiation /control P=0.254
126
127
(Gy)
(Gy)
128
129
1 1 2 1,2
2 http://w3.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/bcphunit/fukushimaproj.html
2 2011 5 Zizeeria maha5 3
3
10 10 12
GM
Cs134 Cs137 K40
100 100 260 cm
10 3
10
10 3
PCR EFI
COI
130
131
1 2 1, 2
1. 2.
(Zizeeria maha)
1
(Pieris rapae)
(2 ) 40.71 1.7K 6.2K 15K Bq / kg ND 15.2
6.9 107.9 Bq / kg
132
133
134
135
136
BLV
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
10 15 20 25
137
587 11,130 40.9 2009 122010 3
558 9,834 28.7 2010 122011 4
138
139
140
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of Cs in SD rats (2 weeks after the dose: CsCl(117mmol/kg=15mg/kg)) t1/2() hr T1/2() hr MRT hr F (bioavailability) %
IV 5.1 1.7 155 16 136 9 - PO 5.1 3.1 160 34 136 20 87 5
Vdss l/kg CLtot ml/min/kg CLr ml/min/kg Urinary recovery % IV 14.6 1.6 1.8 0.2 0.7 0.1 40 3 PO 14.4 3.1 2.0 0.2 0.8 0.2 41 9
Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters of Cs in SD rats (16 weeks after the dose: CsCl(117mol/kg=15mg/kg)) T1/2() hr T1/2() hr T1/2() hr MRT hr F (bioavailability) %
IV 2.11.2 5322 28929 27522 - PO 4.03.4 6831 34118 30847 9110
Vc l/kg Vdss l/kg Cltot ml/min/kg Clr ml/min/kg Urinary recovery % IV 6.52.7 27.02.9 1.70.3 1.00.2 634 PO 5.92.1 29.94.5 1.60.0 1.10.2 6311
141
Table 3. Elimination half lives of Cs in Wagyu Organs (14 weeks after the multiple dose of 137Cs (100kBq/day for 21days)
T1/2() day T1/2() day Muscles 14.03.1 60.87.9
Parenchymal organs
8.80.6 66.53.0
GI tract 7.21.6 63.77.4 Lymph node 7.13.6 82.827.7
Glands 9.92.9 70.83.9 CNS 26.36.3 - Blood 9.9 69.3 Urine 7.7 69.3
Days after the last Cs-137 intake in Wagyu
Blood
Muscles
Blood
Urine
Cs-
137
conc
entr
atio
n(B
q/kg
)
142
http://liffn.jp/
Cs
( )
( )
Cs Cs?
Cs
KaBioavailability
143
Days after Cs administration
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Cs
plasma
Dose CsCl 117 mol/kg po (15mg/kg)
RBCT1/2 160h
Bioavailability 87%
Days after Cs administration
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Cs
plasma
Dose CsCl 117 mol/kg po (15mg/kg)
RBC T1/2 300h
Vdc 6.5L/kgVdss 30L/kgCLtot 1.65ml/kg/h
Bioavailability 91%
144
Days after the first Cs administration
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
CsPB
Ctr
PBPB
Ctr
100
10
1
0.1
0.010 20 40 60 0 20 40 60
PBPB
T1/2 300hDose poCsCl 3.6 mol/kg/dayPB 500 mol/kg/day
145
Cs (Rat)
Cs
( )
( )
63%
PB PB Cs PB
Cs
PB
146
147
148
Total 129 kBq
81 kBq
Total 48 kBq
33 kBq33 kBq
1
10
100
1000
10000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
149
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9 T1/2( ): 69.3
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9
T1/2( ): 69.3
150
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9 T1/2( ): 69.3
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9T1/2( ): 69.3
151
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9
T1/2( ): 69.3
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9
T1/2( ): 69.3
152
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9
T1/2( ): 69.3
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9
T1/2( ): 69.3
T1/2( ): 7.7
T1/2( ): 69.3
153
Cs c
once
ntra
tion(
M)
Days after the last Cs administration
C(t)=A*exp(-t* )+B*exp(-t* )
T1/2( ): 9.9
T1/2( ): 69.3
CV CV14.0 3.1 22.3 60.8 7.9 12.9
8.8 0.6 6.4 66.5 3.0 4.5
7.2 1.6 21.6 63.7 7.4 11.6 7.1 3.6 50.1 82.8 27.7 33.5 9.9 2.9 28.9 70.8 3.9 5.5 26.3 6.2 23.6 4.6 3.1 67.8 33.1 17.2 52.0
T1/2( ): 9.9 T1/2( ): 69.3T1/2( ): 7.7 T1/2( ): 69.3
154
Cs
( )
( )
Cs Cs?
Cs
Bioavailability?
?
T1/2( ): 60-70
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
(90Sr 238Pu,239 240Pu)1
1) 2) 3) 1)
1) 1) 1)
1)2)3)
, 28 8 4
2
Prologue & Backgrouund
174
3
4
175
5
6
176
177
178
12
23
23 9 30
17000 Sr 895700 Sr 90(Bq/m2)Sr 89/Sr 901.9~6.5( 6,5)
179
13
0.55Pu 2380.66Pu 239+240(Bq/m2)Pu 238/Pu 239
0.02610.053
238,239+240,2412 24 8 21
14
502Bq/m2
3070Bq/m2
180
15
1.61Pu 2387.52Pu 239+240(Bq/m2)Pu 238/Pu 239
0,02610.214
16
181
90Sr 238Pu,239 240Pu
24 12
182
19
Q
1999 20091789
(2003 35 )2003 57
2003 452003 29
(2004 34 )(2004 54 )
2004 482004 18
1980 13
183
90Sr 238Pu, 239 240Pu
8 (TMF500,MORITA )
53mesh90Sr
238Pu 239+240Pu
238Pu239+240Pu:(
90Sr
9.6mBq/g H28.04
6.8m Bq/g H28.04
184
23
2004 (2016)7 mBq/g Ca
51 1970)35 1983)
28 1993)
17(2013)
1970 1985309
198010 mBq/g Ca
1971 1979
185
198010 mBq/g Ca
26http://www.kankyo hoshano.go.jp/01/0101flash/01011812_2.html
40
1965 36Bq 23Bq/day 632008 0.031Bq/day 1 1000
186
Sr90Sr 90 2004
(20 )
28
DM) M) P
28 4 11
187
29
Sr 90 7 mBq/g Ca
2004
188
2011
20
189
1 2 3 3 4 3 3 3
5 5 3 6 1, 7
1 2 3 45 6 7
NaI ( )1
1,158Bq/kg 6383
1
402 2
(1)
1 (2) 1
190
191
192
193
194
Dosimetry method of animals affected by Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant No.1 accident
1 1,2 1 3 4 1
( 1 2 3 4 )
( FNPP )
2011 8
FNPP 20km
2011 8 29 2013 3 7
204 Particle
and Heavy Ion Transport Code System ( PHITS )
Geo Information System ( GIS )
(Sato et al., 2012) FNPP
Te-132/I-132 I-131
Cs-134 Cs-137 (Imanaka et al., 2012)
Cs-134 Cs-137
20 Te-129m
Te-129m Te-132 14.5
Tagami et al.,
2013)
FNPP
ICRP
PHITS PHITS
( ICRP Pub.108 )
I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137
Te-129m
GIS
PHITS ICRP 8
200 Gy
30
0.47-
0.84
Te-132 / I-132
7 3
.
195
Figure 1
196
197
2011 3 15132 129m
14.5 : 1.00 (Tagami etal, 2013)
PHITS
GIS
198
Figure 2
Figure 2
PHITS/ICRP
199
Table 0
Table 1
200
Table 2
Figure 3
201
Table 3
Figure 4
202
Te 132 / I 132
73
203
[[ ]
1
127mTe 109129mTe 33.6
1
(IAEA)
[ ] 1.
(Te 1000, Wako)
(CsCl 99.9 %, Wako)
1 mg/dry-soil-kg
4
1 4 150 g 200 g
(Incu Tissue 7272100mm, SPL LIFE
SCIENCES) (Raphanus
sativus var. sativus) (Brassica rapa var.
perviridis) 1 1
1.5 2 cm
8 16 22
2 2
1.5 2cm
2.
1 3.
(CD.15S, ) 70 % HNO3
; 5 ml 30 % H2O2 ; 1.2 ml Topwave,
100 mg
100 mg
ICP-MS(HP-4500, Yokogawa, Japan)
204
[[ ] 1.
127mTe 129mTe
1.11015 Bq 3.31015 Bq
1)
127mTe 129mTe 1 3
2. 137Cs Saito 2011 6
14129mTe 137Cs
137Cs 129mTe2)
137Cs
129mTe
A B127mTe 129mTe
134Cs 137Cs Saito
3. IAEA Technical Report
Series 4723)
4.
ICRP Publication724)
127m Te, 129mTe, 137Cs, 134Cs
3 1 5 10 15
5. 1g
E()/g
E()/g = Ce()
C(Bq/g)
e()
1 g
E()/g
E()/g =C0 e() exp ( -T1/2 / t ) dt
C0
(Bq/g)
e()
T1/2 (days)
t (days)
t = 0 (day) t = 365 (days)
[ ] 1.
2.
(134+137Cs)
(127m+129mTe)
1
137Cs 134Cs
2
[ ]
pH
IAEA TRS 472 1
IAEA
100
12
205
1) ; IAEA
, Available
at:
http://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuclear/backdro
p/pdf/app-chap04-2.pdf 2016 2 1
2) K. Saito, I. Tanihata, M. Fujiwara, T. Saito, S.
Shimoura, T. Otsuka, Y. Onoda, M. Hoshi, Y.
Ikeuchi, F. Takahashi, N. Kinouchi, J. Saegusa, A.
Seki, H. Takemiya and T. Shibata; Detail
deposition density maps constructed by large-scale
soil sampling for gamma-ray emitting radioactive
nuclides from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear
power plant accident. J. Environ. Radioactiv. , 139,
308-319 (2015).
3) International Atomic Energy Agency; IAEA
Technical Report Series 472. Handbook of
parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide
transfer in terrestrial and freshwater environments,
Vienna (2010).
4) International Commission on Radiological
Protection; ICRP Publication 72, Ann. ICRP, 26,
26-27 (1995).
9.210-3 3.010-2 1.110-2 2.710-1
8.610-3 3.210-2 2.310-2 7.610-1
7.410-3 5.110-2 6.710-3 3.910-1
(Sv)
1 5 10 15
1
134+137Cs 15.3 12.4 23.9 34.7 38.5 127m+129mTe 3.5 1.8 1.8 1.2 1.0
(134+137Cs)+(127m+129mTe) 18.9 14.2 25.8 35.9 39.5
2
134+137Cs 283.0 228.3 442.4 641.2 711.1 127m+129mTe 9.8 5.0 5.0 3.2 2.7
(134+137Cs)+(127m+129mTe) 292.8 233.3 447.4 644.4 713.8
1
134+137Cs 11.1 8.9 13.9 18.3 22.0 127m+129mTe 2.4 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.5
(134+137Cs)+(127m+129mTe) 13.5 10.2 14.9 18.9 22.5
2
134+137Cs 60.7 49.0 76.1 100.5 120.8 127m+129mTe 2.5 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.6
(134+137Cs)+(127m+129mTe) 63.2 50.2 77.1 101.1 121.4
206
2016/8/4
2011 3
207
1
50 70
(ICRP) Publication 72 (Publ.72)
208
IAEA)Technical Report Series 472(TRS 472)
35 15
290 811 1
46683
1
/
100 50 50 10
134137
90
106
2012 4
1
1 mSv/year
[Bq/kg]
1
209
!
210
1mg/dry soil kg
1 4
8 1622
60 %
Soil 1:Soil 2Soil 3Soil 4
4
Soil pH(H2O)Ex.K Ex.Na Ex.Ca Ex.Mg Alo Feo Sio T C T N
cmolc/kg %1 5.4 9.39 1.63 24.82 19.91 17.08 1.92 11.07 14.12 0.562 7.6 0.99 0.19 24.94 2.51 0.69 1.52 0.31 2.72 0.273 5.7 0.81 0.11 14.03 4.84 2.56 2.87 0.20 1.32 0.104 6.4 1.75 0.04 2.55 0.43 34.13 11.45 14.73 3.88 0.36
pH(H2O)
Ex. K, Na, Ca, Mg
(Alo) (Feo) (Sio)
(T C) (T N)
4
211
I
III
IIIIII
I
II
III
I
ICP MS
Alo Feo
Soil 1,4
K
Soil 1,4
Alo Feo
212
Soil 2
Soil 1,4
Alo Feo
213
214
These data were measured and presented by Saito et al.
137Cs 129mTe
137Cs 129mTe
A B
A
B
129mTe
127mTe, 129mTe, 131mTe, 132Te
129mTe
3.
B129mTe : 137Cs = 0.71 : 1
2011/6/14A,B
134Cs : 137Cs = 0.91 : 1A
129mTe : 137Cs = 1.49 : 1
2011/3/11
127mTe : 129mTe1 : 3
Saito
127mTe: 109d129mTe: 33.6d131mTe: 30h132Te : 78.2h
127mTe
215
(TRS 472,
(134+137Cs)
(127m+129mTe)
2011/4/30
2011/10/30
216
(Bq/kg)134Cs 137Cs
A 60 59 2011/5/438 39 2011/5/14
B 2 1100 1100 2011/4/132 220 200 2011/3/30
134Cs 137Cs
137Cs
137Cs
2500Bq/kg
1 (g)3 1 5 10 15
*1 31.0 31.0 45.4 45.0 54.1*2 27.7 27.7 50.6 55.1 61.1
217
40
100
1.1 8.3
1.4 17.4
IAEA TRS 472
5.
218
219
2 Cs 90Sr
101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5
10-6
10-7
Cs
1,* , 2 1, 1, 1
1 2
1 Cs
100 m
220
221
222
223
224
225
100 m
226
227
100 m
228
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
0 2 4 6 8
Coun
ts
X ray energy (keV)
O
CNa
Mg
Al
Si
K
Ca
Ti Fe
Fe
104
103
102
101
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
0 2 4 6 8
Coun
ts
X ray energy (keV)
O
CNa
Mg
Al
Si
K
Ca
Ti Fe
Fe
104
103
102
101
229
230
231
232
1986 4
watching
1990
Krivolutsky
1986-1988(1999)
Krivolutsky
R(D+15) mR/h 15
rad
16 15 60 150 160
5 30 40 300 400 11 15 240 150 2500
14 51 15 60 150 600
26 10 60 100 600
2 30 80 500 1200
9 30 80 200 560 2 30 80 400 600
15 30 80 350 600
14 30 80 200 560
100rad Gy
233
187
8
D.A. KrivolutskyBioindication of Radioactive Contamination
NAUKAMoscow 1999 400
234
D.A. Krivolutsky Bioindication of Radioactive ContaminationNAUKA Moscow 1999 pp106-122.
235
236
(1988)
Kuzbov et el. 1991
237
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000 10000
137
100
Bq/m
2G
y h-
1
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000 10000
Gy
h-1
238
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 10 20 30
Cum
ulat
ive
expo
sure
at 1
m a
bove
gro
und
per
initi
al C
s137
dep
ositi
on o
f 1,0
00 k
Bq m
-2, m
Gy
Elapsed time after deposition, year
Total: ChernobylCs134+Cs137: ChernobylTotal: FukushimaCs134+Cs137: Fukushima
239
27
R(D+15) mR/h
15
rad
16 15 60 150 160
5 30 40 300 400 11 15 240 150 2500
14 51 15 60 150 600
26 10 60 100 600
2 30 80 500 1200 9 30 80 200 560
2 30 80 400 60015 30 80 350 600
14 30 80 200 560
100rad Gy
240
241
1986 7 1988 A.N.Severtsov
E.A.FyodorovFyodorov
1986 4 281986 9 1987
Krivolutsky etal 1988 1990; Krivolutsky 19941991
1986 1987
30km 1986 5 1986 1987 7 -8
Prister Shein 1979 1980KRB-G-1 RUP-1
G.N Shein
R(t) t mR/h RD+15 15 mR/h
7.5 RD+15 -0.75 e-3.51 10-3t
70-75 2 1986
30km 27 1
D.A. Krivolutsky Bioindication of Radioactive Contamination NAUKA Moscow 1999 pp106-122.
242
96
1986
mR/h cm-2 min-1 R
3km 86/7/18 49.7 2940
30km 86/7/18 6.1 916
3km 86/9/23 8.0 1.0 5.0 8600
30km 30km15 D+15
D+15 1mR/h 1 60287033
1986-1987
Krivolutsky 1983 IEMEZh225 cm 3cm 10
5cm2 25cm2
!!!!!!
km
1986 30
243
20cm
1987 4
1545
30 100.9 1.4mR/h
Dendrobaena octaedra Eisenia nordenskioldi 1988
krad
50 3 30
12
15
2 2.5 3km
1987 199350 1995
30km
1986 8
10km 1986 8 1
0.3krad 4krad
244
50
30km
30km
30km 45
30km
!!! !!!
(?) 1.5
10 (?)
245
(?)(???)
30km
134 137
246
(N
b95
Zr95
R
u103
R
u106
C
s134
C
s137
C
e141
C
e144
318
41
1 25
66
32
7694
0
3920
73
60
3070
63
16
33
1258
51
51
05
115
50
3057
45
59
021
600
4960
22
134
4503
10
76
3455
181
67
5 10
75
414
2808
0 71
20
9474
57
60
397
1200
114
5 28
3 11
680
1520
11
842
1579
181
67
5 10
472
414
2808
0 71
20
2529
2 57
60
397
1200
116
41
2396
18
13
049
760
1640
0 21
600
4979
5 14
210
2055
5 94
4 33
00
644
1
1 0
1920
19
59
1 28
138
2 58
4 20
7 0
6880
54
38
50
150
38 161
3 491
15
458
35
1434
54
7 10
69
567
1225
1 67.1
64
132
7 26
1 18
0 33
6 20
2 24
2 10
2 22
3 27
135
38
3 57
13
16
8 20
3 14
0 20
4 15
3 5
25
165
34
20
4280
42
10
3652
73
33
8000
85
96
6667
31
37
261
647
62
98
165
141
1070
7 76
94
2927
0 0
7352
0 20
080
3888
0
6479
5 29
240
3239
8 31
29
1246
247
137Cs 137Cs No.1 19.7 No.5 21.9
No.2 43.2 No.6 22.2 No.3 11.3 8.6 No.4 15.1
134 137 60
137 22pCi/kg !!! !!!
137
137137 0.76 0.56
0.86 Ci/kg137
137
0.12 1.0
0.3 2.0
0.3
0.5 0.2
1987 8 1 400rad 5000rad1987 1 1986 8 1
10 20 50 1986
1987 30km
1987
40
248
1987
1987 30km
33 120
1986 19871.5
40 1987
R(D+15) mR/h 15
rad
16 15 60 150 160
5 30 40 300 400 11 15 240 150 2500
14 51 15 60 150 600
26 10 60 100 600
2 30 80 500 1200
9 30 80 200 560 2 30 80 400 600
15 30 80 350 600
14 30 80 200 560
249
1986-19872-3
30km 13790
1986-1987 137 13 20
137 20 450Ci/ km 5km5 16137 0.6 Ci/kg 22kBq/kg 13.4 500kBq/kg 9.5
350kBq/kg 0.7 26kBq/kg 137 450Ci/ km137
15 20 137 20 35Ci/km 13 20 5km 137
0.23 3.8 Ci/kg 8.5 1400 kBq/kg
137 0.1 3.7 Ci/kg 3.7 140 kBq/kg137
5km137
137137
90 1.5 Ci/kg 56
kBq/kg 0.6 Ci/kg 22kBq/kg 2 Ci/kg 74kBq/kg
1986 9 5km
250
3.52 3
30km
Kn
90 137
90 137137 Kn 1.4 1.7
Kn 2 90 137
2km 5
270km 137 2kmKn 0.06 Kn 0.2 5km Kn 0.2 Kn
0.6 270km Kn 4.9 Kn 0.6
30km
30km
90 137
251
137
90
137 137Kn
1986 1987 19871988 1988
1987
10mR/h2 2.5
10mR/h 1989
1990 1988 1988 30km
1987 3 4
1988
252
1986 1987
1988 30km 1987
1988 1988
1986 1988 400 600mR/h
1991 30km
50 120rad
30km 80 95
70
40 60 10 20
30km
50
2016.7.20
253
2016 8 3 4
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. EGS5
7. EPMA
8.
9.
10. 2013 2015
11. Randeep Rakwal Transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiling of low-level gamma irradiated rice at Iitate village, Fukushima
254
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. 90Sr 238Pu,239 240Pu
1 19.
20.
21.
22.
Cs 23.
255
http://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/
KUR REPORT OF KYOTO UNIVERSITY RESEARCH
REACTOR INSTITUTE
28 12 2 TEL072451- 2300