Upload
addison
View
48
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Canadian Institute of Actuaries. L’Institut canadien des actuaires. 2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver. Standards of Practice for Public Personal Injury Compensation Plans (PPICP) Willard A Ramsey. 2007 Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle 2007. PD - 43. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007
Vancouver
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007
Vancouver
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
2 2
PD - 43
•Standards of Practice for Public Personal Injury Compensation Plans (PPICP)
–Willard A Ramsey
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
3 3
Topics
• The relationship of assets and liabilities for PPICP financial statements
• Best estimates for assumptions
• Dynamic capital adequacy
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
4 4
Assets and Liabilities
• Current practice, is not Canadian Asset Liability method (CALM)– is CALM an alternative?
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
• Committee on Workers’ Compensation (CWC) plans.
2007
Ann
ual M
eetin
g
Ass
embl
ée a
nnue
lle 2
007
2007
Ann
ual M
eetin
g
Ass
embl
ée a
nnue
lle 2
007
5 5
Current Practice
• Current method used for valuation of liabilities is the present value of future expected cash flows.
• The discount or valuation interest rate is typically a level rate and does not change from year to year.
• Hence, this method is not directly dependent on investment performance or funded status.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
6 6
CALM
• Should we consider adopting a method such as CALM (Canadian Asset Liability Method)?
• CALM would address the issue that assets and liabilities are not on a consistent basis.200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
7 7
CALM
• However, CALM presents several hurdles.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
8 8
CALM
• Shortage of, or at least not an abundance of, CALM expertise in those practicing in the PPICP field.
• Implementation would be costly and time consuming – would likely require extensive help from consulting firms.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
9 9
CALM
• Significant portion of invested assets are in equities.
• A few WC Boards are not fully funded – still building assets to support liabilities.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
10 10
IASB
• It appears at this point in time that the evolving International Standards are moving towards a liability value that does not depend on the value of the assets.
• If we did adopt CALM were adopted it could be for a relatively short period of time.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
11 11
CALM
• Conclusion of the CWC (Committee on Workers’ Compensation) is that CALM is not a viable option at this time.
• Perhaps an approach similar to CALM?200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
12 12
CWC Plans
• The CWC would like to clarify in the standards:
• A definition of the market value of liabilities.
• If the current approach is still appropriate.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
13 13
CWC Plans
• Outline ways to manage the current approach, e.g. allowing flexibility in the choice of discount rate derived from the fair value of assets.
• Issuance of a guidance note regarding the adjustment of the valuation discount rate.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
14 14
CWC Plans
• A plan to implement moving from current practice to tomorrow’s IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) methodology.
• Whether other methodologies need to be considered.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
15 15
Best Estimates For Assumptions
• Current standards consider:• Plan’s policy:
– pricing stability– smoothing of short term deviations– and equity among generations
• In addition:– ad hoc indexing– intermittence pattern of benefits due to
remission or relapse– Changes in claim practices or economic
conditions
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
16 16
Best Estimates For Assumptions
• The CWC is considering providing guidance on:– Areas where assumptions are
required.– Where it may be appropriate to
combine assumptions.– How to select best estimates.– Margins for adverse deviation – if or
when they may be appropriate.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
17 17
Dynamic Capital Adequacy
• Current environment– PPICP’s are not subject to solvency
standards.• Not regulated by OSFI.• No solvency requirements from
provincial governments.
– Entities can operate with unfunded liabilities.• All have plans to address excess
surpluses or deficits.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
18 18
Dynamic Capital Adequacy
• Actuaries are sometimes asked to provide advice on what is an appropriate level of capital for a PPICP.– Or, to provide sensitivity tests for
various risks and the impact on funding ratios (assets / liabilities) and premium rates.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
19 19
Dynamic Capital Adequacy
• CWC interest is in examining or defining what is adequate / appropriate capital for a PPICP. – Could be quite challenging as
different views are developing.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
20 20
Dynamic Capital Adequacy
• What type of guidance should be provided?– Change to standards or
educational note?
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
21 21
Dynamic Capital Adequacy
• Dependent on the funding policy of the PPICP.– The actuary must work within the
funding policy.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
22 22
Next Steps
• We have several interesting and challenging topics.
• Probably a lot of work ahead.• Look forward to your feedback
and input.
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7
200
7 A
nn
ual M
eeti
ng
Ass
em
blé
e a
nn
uelle
2
00
7