110
81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 )25 7+( ',675,&7 2) &2/80%,$ ,1 5( 0&&250,&. &203$1< ,1& 3(33(5 352'8&76 0$5.(7,1* $1' 6$/(6 35$&7,&(6 /,7,*$7,21 7KLV 'RFXPHQW 5HODWHV WR $// &21680(5 &$6(6 0'/ 'RFNHW 1R 0LVF 1R (6+ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'80 23,1,21 7$%/( 2) &217(176 %$&.*5281' , :+$7 ,6 ³121)81&7,21$/ 6/$&.),//´" $ )HGHUDO /DZ % 6WDWH /DZV & 6ODFN)LOO /LWLJDWLRQ ,, 7+( 35(6(17 /,7,*$7,21 $ )DFWXDO %DFNJURXQG % 3URFHGXUDO +LVWRU\ RI WKH 0XOWL'LVWULFW /LWLJDWLRQ & &XUUHQW 3ODLQWLIIV DQG 5HPDLQLQJ &ODLPV ,,, 027,21 )25 &/$66 &(57,),&$7,21 $ 3URSRVHG &ODVVHV &RQVXPHU 3URWHFWLRQ &ODLPV D 0XOWL6WDWH &RQVXPHU 3URWHFWLRQ &ODVV E 6LQJOH6WDWH &RQVXPHU 3URWHFWLRQ &ODVVHV 8QMXVW (QULFKPHQW &ODLPV D 0XOWL6WDWH 8QMXVW (QULFKPHQW &ODVVHV E 6LQJOH6WDWH 8QMXVW (QULFKPHQW &ODVVHV

)257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 2: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 3: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See In re McCormick

Page 4: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see also Misleading Containers; Nonfunctional Slack-

Fill

Page 5: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See Misleading Containers; Nonfunctional Slack-Fill

see see

See

See

See, e.g.filled see also

Page 6: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See also

Page 7: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See, e.g. Escobar v. Just Born, Inc.

See, e.g. Alce v. Wise Foods, Inc.

See Leonhart v. Nature’s Path Foods, Inc

See Cordes v. Boulder Brands USA, Inc.

See Stewart v. Riviana Foods, Inc.

See Buso v. Vigo Importing Co.

See Hendricks v. StarKist Co.

See Martin v. WM. Wrigley Jr. Co.

See, e.g. Miao Xin Hu v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc.

See Kamal v. Eden Creamery

Reider v. Immaculate Baking Co.

Barrere v. Trader Joe’s Co.

See, e.g. Bush v. Mondelez Int’l

See, e.g. Macaspac v. Henkel Corp.

Page 8: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Cordes Morrison v. Barcel USA, LLCappeal withdrawn

Benson v. Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc.appeal pending

Buso Daniel v. Tootsie Roll Indus.appeal voluntarily dismissed Macaspac

appeal voluntarily dismissed Miao Xin Hu appeal voluntarily withdrawn

AlceWurtzburger v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

Martin v. WM. Wrigley Jr. Co.Stewart Bautista v. CytoSport, Inc.

Bushappeal voluntarily dismissed

Fermin v. Pfizer Inc.

See Izquierdo v. Mondelez Int’l, Inc.

Bimont v. Unilever U.S., Inc.

O’Connor v. Henkel Corp. Gordon v. Tootsie Roll Indus.

See Waters v. Ferrara Candy Co.Smith v. Abbott Labs., Inc.,

Witte v. Gen. Nutrition Corp.

Ivie v. Kraft Foods Glob., Inc.

See Bratton v. Hershey Co.

Page 9: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See Trazo v. Nestle USA, Inc.Samet v.

Procter & Gamble Co.

see

See, e.g. Leonhart Thomas v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Hawkins v. Nestle U.S.A. Inc.Yee Ting Lau v. Pret A Manger (USA) Ltd.

Daniel v. Mondelez Int’l, Inc.Martinez-Leander v. Wellnx Life Sciences, Inc.

Waldman v. New Chapter, Inc.

See Escobar

See Berni v. Barilla G. e R. Fratelli, S.p.A.Hendricks v. StarKist Co

aff’d sub nom. Hendricks v. Ference

See Spacone v. Sanford, L.Pappeal voluntarily dismissed White v. Just

Born, Inc. White IIappeal voluntarily dismissed Turcios v.

Carma Labs., Inc. voluntarily dismissed

Page 10: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

see also

JC
Highlight
JC
Highlight
JC
Highlight
Page 11: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 12: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See

See

See

Page 13: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See

See

See

See

infra

See

See

See

Page 14: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 15: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 16: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See Watkins Inc. v. McCormick & Co.

Minneapolis Star Tribune Watkins

See Watkins sues spice giant McCormick & Co. over pepper tins

Wall Street Journal See

Same Package, Same Price, Less Product–It’s Called a ‘Weight-Out’ in the

Business–a Less Direct Way to Raise Prices for Consumers

see also McCormick Says It Is Not Deceiving Customers with Product

Labeling

See Dupler v. McCormick & Co.

Page 17: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Vladimirsky v.

McCormick & Co.

See

See In re McCormick & Co., Inc., Pepper Prods. Mktg. &

Sales Practices Litig.

See Bunting v. McCormick & Co. Esparza v. McCormick & Co. Ferreri v. McCormick & Co. Linker v. McCormick & Co.

Jung v. McCormick & Co.Bittle v. McCormick & Co.

Vladimirsky v. McCormick & Co.Marsh v. McCormick & Co. Pellitteri v. McCormick & Co. Barnes v. McCormick & Co.

Theis v. McCormick & Co.Thornton v. McCormick & Co.

Gerstnecker v. McCormick & Co.Marron v. McCormick & Co. Fernandez v.

McCormick & Co.

Page 18: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see supra Watkins

See

EsparzaBunting

WatkinsSee In re McCormick

Watkins, Inc. v. McCormick & Co.

Page 19: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See In re McCormick

See id.

Id

Id

Id

Id

In re McCormick

Page 20: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id

See

see In re McCormick

See

see also

See

Id

Page 21: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see also id

Page 22: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 23: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 24: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 25: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

Page 26: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

Page 27: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See

Page 28: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See

See

See

See

Page 29: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

Page 30: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

In re Lorazepam & Clorazepate

Antitrust Litig.

Amchem Prods.,

Inc. v. Windsor

Amchem.

Page 31: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Comcast Corp. v. Behrend Wal-

Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes

Id Wal-Mart

in fact

Id Wal-Mart

Comcast

Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Trust Funds

Id.

Hartman v. Duffey

See In re Korean Air Lines Disaster of Sept. 1,

1983 aff’d sub nom. Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.

Page 32: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See, e.g. In re Yasmin & Yaz (Drospirenone) Mktg., Sales Practices & Prod. Liab.

Litig.

In re Toys “R” Us-Delaware, Inc.-Fair

& Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) Litig.

See

See In re Korean Air Lines Disaster

Id.

In re Korean Air Lines Disaster

Page 33: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Walsh v. Ford Motor Co. In re School Asbestos

Litig.

materially

Klay v. Humana, Inc. abrogated in part on

other grounds by Bridge v. Phx. Bond & Indem. Co. see also Grandalski v.

Quest Diagnostics Inc.

Klay

Walsh see also Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer

Cos.

Page 34: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

In re U.S. Foodservice Inc. Pricing Litig.

sua sponte

See, e.g. Sacred Heart Health Sys., Inc. v. Humana Military

Healthcare Servs., Inc.

Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton

Co.

See, e.g. Mazza v. Am. Honda Motor Co.

Mullins v. Premier Nutrition Corp.

see also In re Bisphenol-A (BPA) Polycarbonate

Plastic Prods. Liab. Litig.

Page 35: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See, e.g.

Grandalski

In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price

Litig.

In re Telectronics Pacing Sys., Inc.

Hughes v. Ester C Co.

Rodriguez v. It's Just Lunch, Intern.

Johnson v. Nextel Commc’ns Inc.

Marshall v. H & R Block Tax Servs., Inc.

In re Rhone–Poulenc Rorer Inc.

Zinser v. Accufix

See

Page 36: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Research Inst., Inc. opinion amended on denial of reh’g

In re Am. Med. Sys., Inc.

In re 100% Grated

Parmesan Cheese Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.

see Amchem

In re Hyundai & Kia Fuel Econ. Litig.

In re Mexico Money Transfer Litig.

Page 37: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id. see also

See

Page 38: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Burden of proof

See

Scienter

see

See De Bouse v.

Bayer AG McKee v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

Graphic Commc’ns Local 1B Health &

Welfare Fund “A” v. CVS Caremark Corp.

See, e.g. Mazza

Page 39: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Definition of Deception

Fowler v. O’Hara

material to a reasonable consumer’s

decision to purchase

capacity or tendency to deceive consumers

See id

Page 40: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Saucier v. Countrywide

Home Loans

Laura v.

DaimlerChrysler Corp. Zine v. Chrysler

Corp.

City of Clinton v. Pilgrim’s

Pride Corp.

Lowell Gas Co. v. Attorney Gen.

Azar v. Prudential Ins. Co.

capacity Thornell v. Seattle Serv. Bureau, Inc.

Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title

Ins. Co.

Page 41: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Causation/Injury/Loss

Page 42: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Patrick v. Wells Fargo Bank

Hangman Ridge

Avery v. State

Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Fitzpatrick v. Gen. Mills, Inc.

See Jones v. Gen. Motors Corp.

Shaulis v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc.

Id

Bellerman v. Fitchburg Gas & Elec. Light Co.

Page 43: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 44: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see also

See

See, e.g. Mazza

In re ConAgra Peanut Butter Prod. Liab. Litig.

Thompson v. Bayer Corp. Mantiply v. Mantiply,

see In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer Litig.

See, e.g. Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

Page 45: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See, e.g. In re Abbott Labs. Norvir Anti-Trust Litig. In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litig.In re Thalomid & Revlimid Antitrust Litig.

See, e.g. Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Prods. Inc.Overka v. Am. Airlines, Inc.

Page 46: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

El Paso Prod. Co. v. Blanchard

Melat, Pressman

& Higbie, LLP v. Hannon Law Firm, LLC

Gagne v. Vaccaro,

Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Res. Recovery Auth.

HPI Health Care Servs., Inc.

v. Mt. Vernon Hosp., Inc.

Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. Wildenstein Paramount

Film Distrib. Corp. v. New York

Harvell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Page 47: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Realmark Developments, Inc. v. Ranson

see also

Alaska Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Millet

Peterson v. Cellco P’ship

Comet Theatre Enters. v. Cartwright

Hill v. Cross Country Settlements, LLC

Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Cotter Global Investors

Agent Corp. v. National Fire Ins. Co.

Howard

v. Turnbull Am. Std. Ins. Co. v. Bracht

Kellogg v. Shushereba

Page 48: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Gallipo v. Rutland

Mueller v. Mueller Legault v. Legault

See In re Gen. Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litig.Porter v. Hu Mosebach v.

Blythe Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.Mountain State Coll. v. Holsinger

Page 49: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Batman v. DeutschReed v. Zipcar, Inc.

EllisDon Constr., Inc. v. Clemson Univ.VCS, Inc. v. Utah Cmty. Bank Firey v. Orozco

See Alce

Bautista Izquierdo

See, e.g. Samiento v. World Yacht Inc. O’Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc.

See In re Santa Fe Nat. Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prod. Liab. Litig.

see also Firey

Page 50: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See In re Gen. MotorsIn re Aqua Dots Prods. Liab.

Litig. i.eis

See Porter

Mosebach v. Blythe

Mountain State Coll.

Batman

EllisDon Constr

VCS, Inc.

Page 51: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Comcast

See supra

See

Page 52: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Coleman v. District of Columbia

Gen. Tel. Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity

Comm’n see also Council of & for the Blind v. Regan

Coleman

See,

e.g. id

See

J.D. v. Azar

Wal-Mart

Wal-Mart see J.D.

see Hoyte v. District of ColumbiaSee

Robidoux v. Celani Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCHarik v. Cal. Teachers Ass’n

Page 53: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Wal-Mart

Id

See see

also e.g. Hendricks v. StarKist Co.

See

See Hilsley v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.

Alcantar v. Hobart Serv

See infra

Page 54: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

Broomfield v. Craft Brew Alliance, Inc.

See infra

See also, e.g., In re NJOY, Inc. Consumer Class Action Litig.

Mednick v. Precor, Inc.

White II

Randolph v. J.M. Smucker Co.

Page 55: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

J.D.

Id Gen. Tel.

Co. v. Falcon

Kifafi v. Hilton Hotels Ret. Plan,

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litig.

claims or defenses J.D.

Id

see also Wal-Mart

In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig.

Page 56: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

Page 57: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see also

See

See

See

See

Page 58: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see

Page 59: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id

Id

Id

Page 60: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

J.D.

Nat’l Ass’n of Regional Med. Programs, Inc. v. Mathews,

see also J.D.

Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia

See

infra

Page 61: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id

Id

See

See supra

infra

Page 62: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

J.D.

See Sandusky Wellness Ctr., LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc.

Id

See,

e.g. Mullins v. Direct Digital

In re Petrobras Sec.

Carrera v. Bayer Corp.

See Karhu v. Vital Pharm., Inc.

Karhu see

See, e.g. Fitzpatrick

Page 63: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See In re Korean Air Lines Disaster

See In re Korean Air

See Mullins v. Direct DigitalBriseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.

Sandusky Wellness Ctr., LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc.

see Rikos v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Compare In re Petrobras Sec.with Brecher v.

Republic of Argentina,

see also EQT Prod. Co. v. Adair

John v. Nat’l Sec Fire & Cas. Co.

Page 64: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Lines Disaster

Mullins v. Direct Digital

id

See id

Briseno v.

ConAgra Foods, Inc.

see Karhu See, e.g. Randolph

In re Korean Air Lines Disaster

see also supra

Carrera

See Briseno Mullins v. Direct Digital

Briseno Mullins v. Direct Digital

Page 65: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Comcast

Amchem

Tyson Foods, Inc. v.

Bouaphakeo

Id.

Page 66: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id.

Klay see also In re

Tropicana Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.

McKinney v. U.S. Postal Serv. see also In

re Vitamins

see also Butler v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Comcast Wal-Mart

Comcast

Page 67: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

et seq

et seq

et seq

Page 68: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see

See Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.

Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.PNR, Inc. v. Beacon Prop. Mgmt., Inc.

Mednick v. Precor, Inc.

Suchanek v. Sturm Foods, Inc. Webb v. Dr Pepper Snapple Grp., Inc.

Murphy v. Stonewall Kitchen, LLC

See, e.g. Bradach v. Pharmavite, LLC

Cold Stone Creamery, Inc. v. Lenora Foods I, LLC

Flynn v. FCA US LLC

Hawkins v. Nestle U.S.A. Inc.

Page 69: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see, e.g.

see

ee also Hawkins v. Nestle U.S.A. Inc.

see, e.g. Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC

Escobar v. Just Born Inc.

Stemm v. Tootsie

Roll Indus. Hawkins

Page 70: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Benson v. Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc.

See

capable see infra

see also

See

Page 71: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See

See, e.g. Hilsley

Alcantar

Page 72: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Comcast

Id

Id

Page 73: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig. see also In re

Neurontin Antitrust Litig.

Kleen Prods. LLC v. Int’l Paper Co.

Hoyte v. District of

Columbia McCarthy v. Kleindienst

Page 74: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See, e.g. Farar v. Bayer AG

Suchanek v. Sturm Foods, Inc.

In re ConAgra Foods, Inc.

aff’d sub nom. Briseno v. ConAgra

Foods, Inc. and Kumar v.

Salov N. Am. Corp.

Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.

See

Page 75: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see also

id

Compare Kumar

with Victor v. R.C.

Bigelow, Inc.

See

See, e.g.

Page 76: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See

See

See

Page 77: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see also

See, e.g. Kumar

Farar

Fitzhenry-Russell v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Grp.,

Inc.

Canada Dry is made with real ginger Martin

Page 78: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

v. Monsanto Co.

Mullins v. Premier Nutrition Corp.

See, e.g. In re 5-Hour Energy Mktg. & Sales

Practices Litig.

Cormier v. Carrier Corp.

consumer

Page 79: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Amgen Comcast

Amgen

Amgen

id

Id.

Id.

Comcast

Comcast

infra

See Bradach

Page 80: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

v. Pharmavite, LLC Hadley

Suchanek

See Suchanek Langendorf v. Skinnygirl Cocktails, LLC

Clark v. Bumbo Int’l Trust

must

See Hilsley

See also Hilsley Broomfield In re Arris Cable Modem Consumer Litig. Lewert v. Boiron, Inc. Escobar

Page 81: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Vioxx Class Cases

Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court In re Tobacco II

Cases see also Racies v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC

Amgen

no

See Kwikset

In re Tobacco II Cases

Page 82: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Werdebaugh v. Blue Diamond Growers

see also e.g. Hadley

Amgen

Bradach Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.

Bradach

See also Lewert v. Boiron, Mullins v. Premier Nutrition

Amgen id

Fitzhenry-Russell

Amgen Broomfield

Amgen Schneider v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Butler v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc.Hilsley

Page 83: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id

see also Escobar Bradach

Hadley

Amgen

Amgen

Bradach

See In

re 5-Hour Energy

Kosta v. Del

Monte Foods, Inc.

Page 84: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Jones v. ConAgra

how

Townsend v. Monster Beverage Corp.

In re 5-Hour Energy

see

also Jones v. ConAgra

See Alvarez v. NBTY, Inc.

Page 85: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Kosta

Kosta

Id Stearns v. Ticketmaster

Corp.

Bradach

Comcast

Amgen Tyson

See Brockey v. Moore

see also Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler

Corp.

Hadley

Page 86: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Grp., Inc.

Mullins v. Premier Nutrition

Colgan

See Fitzhenry-Russell

See Hadley

see also supra

see

see

see

Page 87: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

In re Tobacco II Cases Hadley

Id.

Id.

Steroid Hormone Prod. Cases

as modified on denial of reh'g

Engalla v. Permanente Medical Grp., Inc.

See

see

See, e.g.

Kwikset

Page 88: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Kumar Hinojos v. Kohl’s Corp.

but see Victor

De Bouse

Id

Clark v. Bumbo

Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co.

Connick see also Lateef v. Pharmavite LLC

Page 89: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Mednick

Pella Corp. v. Saltzman,

Oshana v. Coca-Cola

Co. see also Avery

Oliveira v. Amoco Oil Co.

See Siegel v. Shell Oil Co

See Clark v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

Walsh Chiropractic, Ltd. v. StrataCare, Inc.

Barbara’s

Sales, Inc. v. Intel Corp.

Page 90: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Suchanek

see also Pella Corp,

In re IKO Roofing Shingle Prods. Liab.

Litig. Pella

see

also Tyson Foods,

Amchem

Page 91: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Suchanek

Comcast

see supra

Cf Suchanek

not See

Page 92: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Suchanek

Suchanek

Suchanek

Suchanek see also Suchanek

Wall Street Journal Minneapolis Star Tribune

i.e.,Suchanek

Page 93: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Suchanek

Suchanek

Suchanek

Id.

Langendorf

Langendorf

no

Page 94: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id

Id

Clark v. Bumbo

Skinnygirl Bumbo Suchanek

Page 95: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

City First Mortg. Corp.

v. Barton Rollins, Inc. v. Butland

see also Carriuolo v. Gen. Motors Co.

Davis v. Powertel, Inc.

see supra

Fitzpatrick Carriuolo

see also State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Performance Orthapaedics &

Neurosurgery LLC

Carriuolo Rollins, Inc. v. Heller,

Page 96: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

State Farm

Amgen

Davis

See, e.g. Carriuolo

Fitzpatrick

Page 97: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Hasemann v. Gerber Prod. Co.

Nelson

v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.

Randolph v. J.M. Smucker Co.

Pop’s Pancakes, Inc. v. NuCO2, Inc.

See Bowe v. Pub. Storage

See also Miami Auto. Retail, Inc. v. Baldwin

Rollins v. Butland

Perisic v. Ashley Furniture Indus.,

Inc.

Hummel v. Tamko Bldg. Prods.

Page 98: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

See Carriuolo State Farm

Murphy v. Stonewall

Kitchen, LLC

see supra

Page 99: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Plubell v. Merck & Co. see also Murphy

Hawkins White v. Just Born, Inc.

White I Bratton v. Hershey Co.

Bratton I

Plubell

George v. Omega Flex, Inc.

Polk v. KV Pharm. Co.

see Hawkins White I

Bratton I

Murphy Plubell see also

Thompson v. Allergan USA, Inc.

Hawkins White I

Bratton I

Page 100: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

see, e.g. White I Hawkins

Bratton I

White v. Just Born

See White

White II

White II State ex rel. Coca-Cola Co.

v. Nixon

Nixon

Id.

Page 101: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Id. Nixon

Id. Craft

Id Craft v. Philip Morris Cos.

Craft

Nixon

see also Hope v. Nissan N.A. Inc

Nixon

Plubell

Craft Hope Plubell

Page 102: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Plubell

See

at the expense of another Lyles v. Sangadeo-Patel

Page 103: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

as between the two persons Ghirardo v. Antonioli

that the failure of payment

was to the plaintiffs’ detriment Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.

see also id.

it becomes necessary in any case where the benefit of the doctrine is claimed, to

examine the circumstances and the conduct of the parties

must be determined by the nature of the dealings between the recipient of the benefit and the

party seeking restitution, and those dealings will necessarily vary from one case to the next

4934, Inc. v. Distrist of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs

to the plaintiff’s detriment

HPI Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hosp., Inc.

as between the two

First Nat’l Bank of Md. v. Shpritz

if the parties receive what

Page 104: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

they intended to obtain Am. Std. Ins. Co

unique

factual circumstances Styer v. Hugo

aff’d

In re Tropicana Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.

In

re Tropicana

In re Dial Complete Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.

In re Dial

Id

Id

Page 105: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Lipton v. Chattem, Inc.

Lipton

Id

In re BPA

In re BPA

all

Page 106: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Amchem

Page 107: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

Amchem

Klay Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.

Amchem

Page 108: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21

supra

McKinney

See

Page 109: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21
Page 110: )257+(',675,&72)&2/80%,$ 5('$&7(' 0(025$1'8023,1,21